Free Trial

Frasers Group (FRAS) Competitors

Frasers Group logo
GBX 792 +13.00 (+1.67%)
As of 12:22 PM Eastern

FRAS vs. SPD, DNLM, CURY, PETS, and MOON

Should you buy Frasers Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Frasers Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Frasers Group include Sports Direct International (SPD), Dunelm Group (DNLM), Currys (CURY), Pets at Home Group (PETS), and Moonpig Group (MOON). These companies are all part of the "specialty retail" industry.

How does Frasers Group compare to Sports Direct International?

Frasers Group (LON:FRAS) and Sports Direct International (LON:SPD) are both mid-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Frasers Group has higher revenue and earnings than Sports Direct International. Sports Direct International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frasers Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frasers Group£5.05B0.68£365.76M£108.007.33
Sports Direct International£3.70B0.00N/A£21.50N/A

In the previous week, Frasers Group had 11 more articles in the media than Sports Direct International. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Frasers Group and 0 mentions for Sports Direct International. Sports Direct International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Frasers Group's score of -0.08 indicating that Sports Direct International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Frasers Group Neutral
Sports Direct International Neutral

Frasers Group has a net margin of 9.42% compared to Sports Direct International's net margin of 0.00%. Frasers Group's return on equity of 21.64% beat Sports Direct International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frasers Group9.42% 21.64% 7.43%
Sports Direct International N/A N/A N/A

10.6% of Frasers Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 76.2% of Frasers Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Frasers Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 950, indicating a potential upside of 19.95%. Given Frasers Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Frasers Group is more favorable than Sports Direct International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frasers Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Sports Direct International
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Frasers Group beats Sports Direct International on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frasers Group compare to Dunelm Group?

Frasers Group (LON:FRAS) and Dunelm Group (LON:DNLM) are both consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and earnings.

Frasers Group has higher revenue and earnings than Dunelm Group. Frasers Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dunelm Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frasers Group£5.05B0.68£365.76M£108.007.33
Dunelm Group£1.80B0.90£150.85M£73.5010.95

Frasers Group has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dunelm Group has a beta of 0.963, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Frasers Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 950, suggesting a potential upside of 19.95%. Dunelm Group has a consensus price target of GBX 1,199.44, suggesting a potential upside of 49.09%. Given Dunelm Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Dunelm Group is more favorable than Frasers Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frasers Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Dunelm Group
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, Frasers Group had 10 more articles in the media than Dunelm Group. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Frasers Group and 1 mentions for Dunelm Group. Dunelm Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Frasers Group's score of -0.08 indicating that Dunelm Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Frasers Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Dunelm Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Frasers Group has a net margin of 9.42% compared to Dunelm Group's net margin of 8.29%. Dunelm Group's return on equity of 105.88% beat Frasers Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frasers Group9.42% 21.64% 7.43%
Dunelm Group 8.29%105.88%19.34%

10.6% of Frasers Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.2% of Dunelm Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 76.2% of Frasers Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.2% of Dunelm Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Dunelm Group beats Frasers Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frasers Group compare to Currys?

Frasers Group (LON:FRAS) and Currys (LON:CURY) are both consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

Frasers Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Currys. Frasers Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Currys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frasers Group£5.05B0.68£365.76M£108.007.33
Currys£9.02B0.18£195.60M£11.6013.23

10.6% of Frasers Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.1% of Currys shares are owned by institutional investors. 76.2% of Frasers Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.4% of Currys shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Frasers Group has a net margin of 9.42% compared to Currys' net margin of 1.46%. Frasers Group's return on equity of 21.64% beat Currys' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frasers Group9.42% 21.64% 7.43%
Currys 1.46%5.88%1.54%

Frasers Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 950, suggesting a potential upside of 19.95%. Currys has a consensus target price of GBX 177, suggesting a potential upside of 15.31%. Given Frasers Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Frasers Group is more favorable than Currys.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frasers Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Currys
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Frasers Group has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Currys has a beta of 1.273, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Currys had 29 more articles in the media than Frasers Group. MarketBeat recorded 40 mentions for Currys and 11 mentions for Frasers Group. Currys' average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Frasers Group's score of -0.08 indicating that Currys is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Frasers Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Currys
8 Very Positive mention(s)
10 Positive mention(s)
19 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Frasers Group and Currys tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frasers Group compare to Pets at Home Group?

Pets at Home Group (LON:PETS) and Frasers Group (LON:FRAS) are both consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, Frasers Group had 11 more articles in the media than Pets at Home Group. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Frasers Group and 0 mentions for Pets at Home Group. Pets at Home Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Frasers Group's score of -0.08 indicating that Pets at Home Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pets at Home Group Neutral
Frasers Group Neutral

Frasers Group has higher revenue and earnings than Pets at Home Group. Frasers Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pets at Home Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pets at Home Group£1.47B0.57£75.43M£13.6013.88
Frasers Group£5.05B0.68£365.76M£108.007.33

Frasers Group has a net margin of 9.42% compared to Pets at Home Group's net margin of 4.29%. Frasers Group's return on equity of 21.64% beat Pets at Home Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pets at Home Group4.29% 6.50% 4.66%
Frasers Group 9.42%21.64%7.43%

59.1% of Pets at Home Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.6% of Frasers Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Pets at Home Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 76.2% of Frasers Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pets at Home Group has a beta of 1.083, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frasers Group has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Pets at Home Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 240, suggesting a potential upside of 27.19%. Frasers Group has a consensus price target of GBX 950, suggesting a potential upside of 19.95%. Given Pets at Home Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Pets at Home Group is more favorable than Frasers Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pets at Home Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Frasers Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Frasers Group beats Pets at Home Group on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Frasers Group compare to Moonpig Group?

Moonpig Group (LON:MOON) and Frasers Group (LON:FRAS) are both consumer cyclical companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

Moonpig Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 300.83, suggesting a potential upside of 33.66%. Frasers Group has a consensus target price of GBX 950, suggesting a potential upside of 19.95%. Given Moonpig Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Moonpig Group is more favorable than Frasers Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Moonpig Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Frasers Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Moonpig Group has a beta of 0.968, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frasers Group has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

67.3% of Moonpig Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.6% of Frasers Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of Moonpig Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 76.2% of Frasers Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Frasers Group had 9 more articles in the media than Moonpig Group. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Frasers Group and 2 mentions for Moonpig Group. Moonpig Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Frasers Group's score of -0.08 indicating that Moonpig Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Moonpig Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Frasers Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Moonpig Group has a net margin of 13.10% compared to Frasers Group's net margin of 9.42%. Frasers Group's return on equity of 21.64% beat Moonpig Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Moonpig Group13.10% -113.93% 15.92%
Frasers Group 9.42%21.64%7.43%

Frasers Group has higher revenue and earnings than Moonpig Group. Frasers Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Moonpig Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Moonpig Group£360.66M1.87£33.88M£13.8016.31
Frasers Group£5.05B0.68£365.76M£108.007.33

Summary

Moonpig Group beats Frasers Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Frasers Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FRAS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FRAS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FRAS vs. The Competition

MetricFrasers GroupSpecialty Retail IndustryCyclical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.41B£4.26B£3.96B£2.79B
Dividend Yield0.25%4.32%3.52%6.13%
P/E Ratio7.3317.1576.03366.76
Price / Sales0.6826.08323.1386,680.88
Price / Cash11.4414.6030.8027.87
Price / Book1.8510.913.347.84
Net Income£365.76M£141.85M£249.12M£5.89B
7 Day Performance6.24%-0.86%0.09%-0.05%
1 Month Performance16.39%2.37%1.70%2.05%
1 Year Performance10.54%-6.37%-0.04%75.16%

Frasers Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FRAS
Frasers Group
2.7665 of 5 stars
GBX 792
+1.7%
GBX 950
+19.9%
+8.6%£3.41B£5.05B7.3332,000
SPD
Sports Direct International
N/AN/AN/AN/A£2.45B£3.70B21.8626,500
DNLM
Dunelm Group
4.2854 of 5 stars
GBX 763.50
+0.9%
GBX 1,199.44
+57.1%
-32.4%£1.54B£1.80B10.3911,000
CURY
Currys
3.6974 of 5 stars
GBX 147.30
+0.2%
GBX 177
+20.2%
+23.0%£1.53B£9.02B12.7028,000
PETS
Pets at Home Group
3.3787 of 5 stars
GBX 186
-2.9%
GBX 240
+29.0%
-28.4%£822.32M£1.47B11.20210

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:FRAS) was last updated on 6/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners