Currys (CURY) Competitors

In the previous week, Currys had 12 more articles in the media than Sports Direct International. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Currys and 0 mentions for Sports Direct International. Currys' average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat Sports Direct International's score of 0.00 indicating that Currys is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Currys has higher revenue and earnings than Sports Direct International. Sports Direct International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Currys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

46.1% of Currys shares are held by institutional investors. 15.4% of Currys shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Currys has a consensus target price of GBX 178.50, suggesting a potential upside of 8.64%. Given Currys' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Currys is more favorable than Sports Direct International.

Currys has a net margin of 1.78% compared to Sports Direct International's net margin of 0.00%. Currys' return on equity of 7.10% beat Sports Direct International's return on equity.

In the previous week, Currys had 12 more articles in the media than Dunelm Group. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Currys and 0 mentions for Dunelm Group. Currys' average media sentiment score of 0.04 beat Dunelm Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Currys is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Dunelm Group has a beta of 0.961, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Currys has a beta of 1.265, suggesting that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

39.8% of Dunelm Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.1% of Currys shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.2% of Dunelm Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.4% of Currys shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dunelm Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,177.22, suggesting a potential upside of 32.42%. Currys has a consensus price target of GBX 178.50, suggesting a potential upside of 8.64%. Given Dunelm Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Dunelm Group is more favorable than Currys.

Currys has higher revenue and earnings than Dunelm Group. Currys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dunelm Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dunelm Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 44.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Currys pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Dunelm Group pays out 60.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Currys pays out 15.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Dunelm Group has a net margin of 8.29% compared to Currys' net margin of 1.78%. Dunelm Group's return on equity of 105.88% beat Currys' return on equity.

Pets at Home Group has a beta of 1.094, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Currys has a beta of 1.265, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Currys had 6 more articles in the media than Pets at Home Group. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Currys and 6 mentions for Pets at Home Group. Pets at Home Group's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Currys' score of 0.04 indicating that Pets at Home Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Pets at Home Group presently has a consensus price target of GBX 240, suggesting a potential upside of 11.96%. Currys has a consensus price target of GBX 178.50, suggesting a potential upside of 8.64%. Given Pets at Home Group's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Pets at Home Group is more favorable than Currys.

57.8% of Pets at Home Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.1% of Currys shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Pets at Home Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.4% of Currys shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Pets at Home Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 13 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.1%. Currys pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Pets at Home Group pays out 95.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Currys pays out 15.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Pets at Home Group has a net margin of 4.29% compared to Currys' net margin of 1.78%. Currys' return on equity of 7.10% beat Pets at Home Group's return on equity.

Currys has higher revenue and earnings than Pets at Home Group. Currys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pets at Home Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Currys had 9 more articles in the media than Moonpig Group. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Currys and 3 mentions for Moonpig Group. Moonpig Group's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Currys' score of 0.04 indicating that Moonpig Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Currys has a beta of 1.265, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Moonpig Group has a beta of 0.953, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

46.1% of Currys shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.2% of Moonpig Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.4% of Currys shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Moonpig Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Currys has higher revenue and earnings than Moonpig Group. Currys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Moonpig Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Currys currently has a consensus price target of GBX 178.50, indicating a potential upside of 8.64%. Moonpig Group has a consensus price target of GBX 299.29, indicating a potential upside of 7.84%. Given Currys' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Currys is more favorable than Moonpig Group.

Moonpig Group has a net margin of 13.87% compared to Currys' net margin of 1.78%. Currys' return on equity of 7.10% beat Moonpig Group's return on equity.

Currys pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Moonpig Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Currys pays out 15.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Moonpig Group pays out 20.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Currys is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.