Currys (CURY) Competitors

Currys presently has a consensus target price of GBX 174, suggesting a potential upside of 11.40%. Given Currys' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Currys is more favorable than Sports Direct International.

46.1% of Currys shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.4% of Currys shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Currys has higher revenue and earnings than Sports Direct International. Sports Direct International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Currys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Currys has a net margin of 1.46% compared to Sports Direct International's net margin of 0.00%. Currys' return on equity of 5.88% beat Sports Direct International's return on equity.

In the previous week, Currys had 24 more articles in the media than Sports Direct International. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Currys and 0 mentions for Sports Direct International. Currys' average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Sports Direct International's score of 0.00 indicating that Currys is being referred to more favorably in the media.

39.2% of Dunelm Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.1% of Currys shares are held by institutional investors. 34.2% of Dunelm Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.4% of Currys shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dunelm Group has a net margin of 8.29% compared to Currys' net margin of 1.46%. Dunelm Group's return on equity of 105.88% beat Currys' return on equity.

Dunelm Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 1,199.44, indicating a potential upside of 47.99%. Currys has a consensus target price of GBX 174, indicating a potential upside of 11.40%. Given Dunelm Group's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Dunelm Group is more favorable than Currys.

Currys has higher revenue and earnings than Dunelm Group. Dunelm Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Currys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dunelm Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 44.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Currys pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Dunelm Group pays out 60.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Currys pays out 12.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Dunelm Group has a beta of 0.963, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Currys has a beta of 1.273, suggesting that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Currys had 23 more articles in the media than Dunelm Group. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Currys and 1 mentions for Dunelm Group. Currys' average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Dunelm Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Currys is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Pets at Home Group has a net margin of 4.29% compared to Currys' net margin of 1.46%. Pets at Home Group's return on equity of 6.50% beat Currys' return on equity.

Currys has higher revenue and earnings than Pets at Home Group. Pets at Home Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Currys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Currys pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Pets at Home Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 13 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.4%. Currys pays out 12.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pets at Home Group pays out 95.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Currys had 23 more articles in the media than Pets at Home Group. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Currys and 1 mentions for Pets at Home Group. Currys' average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Pets at Home Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Currys is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Currys has a beta of 1.273, suggesting that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pets at Home Group has a beta of 1.083, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

46.1% of Currys shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.1% of Pets at Home Group shares are held by institutional investors. 15.4% of Currys shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Pets at Home Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Currys presently has a consensus price target of GBX 174, indicating a potential upside of 11.40%. Pets at Home Group has a consensus price target of GBX 240, indicating a potential upside of 37.35%. Given Pets at Home Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pets at Home Group is more favorable than Currys.

In the previous week, Currys had 24 more articles in the media than Moonpig Group. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Currys and 0 mentions for Moonpig Group. Currys' average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Moonpig Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Currys is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Moonpig Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 300.83, indicating a potential upside of 38.54%. Currys has a consensus target price of GBX 174, indicating a potential upside of 11.40%. Given Moonpig Group's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Moonpig Group is more favorable than Currys.

67.3% of Moonpig Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.1% of Currys shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of Moonpig Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.4% of Currys shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Moonpig Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Currys pays an annual dividend of GBX 1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Moonpig Group pays out 21.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Currys pays out 12.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Moonpig Group has a beta of 0.968, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Currys has a beta of 1.273, meaning that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Moonpig Group has a net margin of 13.10% compared to Currys' net margin of 1.46%. Currys' return on equity of 5.88% beat Moonpig Group's return on equity.

Currys has higher revenue and earnings than Moonpig Group. Currys is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Moonpig Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.