Free Trial
Your Portfolio Deserves Better! MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
Upgrade Now
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Physiomics (PYC) Competitors

Physiomics logo
GBX 0.57 +0.02 (+2.90%)
As of 09:57 AM Eastern

PYC vs. GENF, SNG, BVX, OBD, and NFX

Should you buy Physiomics stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Physiomics with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Physiomics include Genflow Biosciences (GENF), Synairgen (SNG), BiVictriX Therapeutics (BVX), Oxford BioDynamics (OBD), and Nuformix (NFX). These companies are all part of the "biotechnology" industry.

How does Physiomics compare to Genflow Biosciences?

Physiomics (LON:PYC) and Genflow Biosciences (LON:GENF) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Physiomics had 1 more articles in the media than Genflow Biosciences. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Physiomics and 0 mentions for Genflow Biosciences. Physiomics' average media sentiment score of 0.26 beat Genflow Biosciences' score of 0.00 indicating that Physiomics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Physiomics Neutral
Genflow Biosciences Neutral

Genflow Biosciences has a net margin of 840.76% compared to Physiomics' net margin of -50.92%. Genflow Biosciences' return on equity of 377.33% beat Physiomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Physiomics-50.92% -89.43% -76.38%
Genflow Biosciences 840.76%377.33%-58.66%

Physiomics has higher revenue and earnings than Genflow Biosciences. Genflow Biosciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Physiomics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Physiomics£953.01K2.70-£922.82K-£0.15N/A
Genflow BiosciencesN/AN/A-£1.76M-£0.33N/A

Physiomics has a beta of 0.946, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Genflow Biosciences has a beta of 2.108, indicating that its stock price is 111% more volatile than the broader market.

0.8% of Physiomics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Genflow Biosciences shares are held by institutional investors. 4.9% of Physiomics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.5% of Genflow Biosciences shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Physiomics beats Genflow Biosciences on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Physiomics compare to Synairgen?

Synairgen (LON:SNG) and Physiomics (LON:PYC) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Synairgen has a beta of -2.23, suggesting that its share price is 323% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Physiomics has a beta of 0.946, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Physiomics had 1 more articles in the media than Synairgen. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Physiomics and 0 mentions for Synairgen. Physiomics' average media sentiment score of 0.26 beat Synairgen's score of 0.00 indicating that Physiomics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Synairgen Neutral
Physiomics Neutral

Physiomics has higher revenue and earnings than Synairgen. Physiomics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Synairgen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SynairgenN/AN/A-£15.86M-£1.66N/A
Physiomics£953.01K2.70-£922.82K-£0.15N/A

Synairgen has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Physiomics' net margin of -50.92%. Synairgen's return on equity of -51.06% beat Physiomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SynairgenN/A -51.06% -30.58%
Physiomics -50.92%-89.43%-76.38%

30.7% of Synairgen shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of Physiomics shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of Synairgen shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of Physiomics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Physiomics beats Synairgen on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Physiomics compare to BiVictriX Therapeutics?

Physiomics (LON:PYC) and BiVictriX Therapeutics (LON:BVX) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings and risk.

In the previous week, Physiomics had 1 more articles in the media than BiVictriX Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Physiomics and 0 mentions for BiVictriX Therapeutics. Physiomics' average media sentiment score of 0.26 beat BiVictriX Therapeutics' score of 0.00 indicating that Physiomics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Physiomics Neutral
BiVictriX Therapeutics Neutral

Physiomics has higher revenue and earnings than BiVictriX Therapeutics. Physiomics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BiVictriX Therapeutics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Physiomics£953.01K2.70-£922.82K-£0.15N/A
BiVictriX TherapeuticsN/AN/A-£2.67M-£0.04N/A

0.8% of Physiomics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.8% of BiVictriX Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of Physiomics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 42.6% of BiVictriX Therapeutics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

BiVictriX Therapeutics has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Physiomics' net margin of -50.92%. Physiomics' return on equity of -89.43% beat BiVictriX Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Physiomics-50.92% -89.43% -76.38%
BiVictriX Therapeutics N/A -103.99%-62.99%

Physiomics has a beta of 0.946, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BiVictriX Therapeutics has a beta of -0.73, indicating that its stock price is 173% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Physiomics beats BiVictriX Therapeutics on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Physiomics compare to Oxford BioDynamics?

Oxford BioDynamics (LON:OBD) and Physiomics (LON:PYC) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, valuation and media sentiment.

Physiomics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Oxford BioDynamics. Physiomics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford BioDynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oxford BioDynamics£1.10M7.68-£103.52M-£0.80N/A
Physiomics£953.01K2.70-£922.82K-£0.15N/A

Physiomics has a net margin of -50.92% compared to Oxford BioDynamics' net margin of -1,018.54%. Physiomics' return on equity of -89.43% beat Oxford BioDynamics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Oxford BioDynamics-1,018.54% -316.67% -56.23%
Physiomics -50.92%-89.43%-76.38%

In the previous week, Physiomics had 1 more articles in the media than Oxford BioDynamics. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Physiomics and 0 mentions for Oxford BioDynamics. Physiomics' average media sentiment score of 0.26 beat Oxford BioDynamics' score of 0.00 indicating that Physiomics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Oxford BioDynamics Neutral
Physiomics Neutral

Oxford BioDynamics has a beta of 0.42, meaning that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Physiomics has a beta of 0.946, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

25.4% of Oxford BioDynamics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of Physiomics shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.6% of Oxford BioDynamics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of Physiomics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Physiomics beats Oxford BioDynamics on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Physiomics compare to Nuformix?

Physiomics (LON:PYC) and Nuformix (LON:NFX) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Physiomics had 1 more articles in the media than Nuformix. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Physiomics and 0 mentions for Nuformix. Physiomics' average media sentiment score of 0.26 beat Nuformix's score of 0.00 indicating that Physiomics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Physiomics Neutral
Nuformix Neutral

Physiomics has a beta of 0.946, indicating that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nuformix has a beta of 1.545, indicating that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market.

0.8% of Physiomics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Nuformix shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of Physiomics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.3% of Nuformix shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Nuformix has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Physiomics' net margin of -50.92%. Nuformix's return on equity of -83.53% beat Physiomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Physiomics-50.92% -89.43% -76.38%
Nuformix N/A -83.53%-17.20%

Nuformix has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Physiomics. Nuformix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Physiomics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Physiomics£953.01K2.70-£922.82K-£0.15N/A
NuformixN/AN/A-£383.40K-£0.04N/A

Summary

Nuformix beats Physiomics on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Physiomics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PYC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PYC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PYC vs. The Competition

MetricPhysiomicsBiotechnology IndustryMedical SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£2.57M£462.13M£6.29B£2.77B
Dividend Yield6.20%3.86%2.80%6.15%
P/E Ratio-3.793.8020.62365.17
Price / Sales2.707,455.24545.5887,687.40
Price / Cash4.2113.1327.4827.89
Price / Book2.7284.129.737.65
Net Income-£922.82K-£96.07M£3.55B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-12.62%0.84%-1.86%0.12%
1 Month Performance20.85%0.12%-3.69%0.31%
1 Year Performance35.89%69.11%29.52%83.58%

Physiomics Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PYC
Physiomics
N/AGBX 0.57
+2.9%
N/A+37.6%£2.57M£953.01KN/A10
GENF
Genflow Biosciences
N/AGBX 2.20
-4.3%
N/A+118.8%£11.78MN/AN/A5
SNG
Synairgen
N/AN/AN/AN/A£9.04MN/AN/A34
BVX
BiVictriX Therapeutics
N/AN/AN/AN/A£8.25MN/AN/A17
OBD
Oxford BioDynamics
N/AGBX 0.19
+2.7%
N/A-51.7%£8.15M£1.10MN/A45

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:PYC) was last updated on 5/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners