Top 5 Stocks to Buy Now
→ Palantir just handed this company AI superpowers (From Monument Traders Alliance) (Ad)tc pixel Free SEC Stock Alerts

Strategic Equity Capital (SEC) Competitors

Strategic Equity Capital logo
GBX 371 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 06/25/2026 11:50 AM Eastern
Compare

SEC vs. POLN, JCH, AAIF, PAC, and NAIT

Should you buy Strategic Equity Capital stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Strategic Equity Capital with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Strategic Equity Capital include Pollen Street Group (POLN), JPMorgan Claverhouse (JCH), abrdn Asian Income Fund (AAIF), Pacific Assets (PAC), and North American Income Trust (NAIT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Strategic Equity Capital compare to Pollen Street Group?

Strategic Equity Capital (LON:SEC) and Pollen Street Group (LON:POLN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Strategic Equity Capital has a beta of 0.74126995, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pollen Street Group has a beta of 0.013, suggesting that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the broader market.

Pollen Street Group has higher revenue and earnings than Strategic Equity Capital. Pollen Street Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Strategic Equity Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Strategic Equity Capital£19.38M6.53£25.65M£38.249.70
Pollen Street Group£118.52M4.16£44.86M£93.708.86

Pollen Street Group has a net margin of 53.91% compared to Strategic Equity Capital's net margin of 33.47%. Strategic Equity Capital's return on equity of 10.95% beat Pollen Street Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Strategic Equity Capital33.47% 10.95% 10.64%
Pollen Street Group 53.91%9.58%5.32%

Pollen Street Group has a consensus target price of GBX 1,088.67, suggesting a potential upside of 31.16%. Given Pollen Street Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pollen Street Group is more favorable than Strategic Equity Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Strategic Equity Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Pollen Street Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Strategic Equity Capital and Strategic Equity Capital both had 1 articles in the media. Strategic Equity Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pollen Street Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Strategic Equity Capital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Pollen Street Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Strategic Equity Capital pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Pollen Street Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 54.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Strategic Equity Capital pays out 11.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pollen Street Group pays out 57.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

7.0% of Strategic Equity Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.4% of Pollen Street Group shares are held by institutional investors. 13.7% of Strategic Equity Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.3% of Pollen Street Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Pollen Street Group beats Strategic Equity Capital on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Equity Capital compare to JPMorgan Claverhouse?

Strategic Equity Capital (LON:SEC) and JPMorgan Claverhouse (LON:JCH) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Strategic Equity Capital had 1 more articles in the media than JPMorgan Claverhouse. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Strategic Equity Capital and 0 mentions for JPMorgan Claverhouse. Strategic Equity Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan Claverhouse'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Strategic Equity Capital Neutral
JPMorgan Claverhouse Neutral

7.0% of Strategic Equity Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.5% of JPMorgan Claverhouse shares are held by institutional investors. 13.7% of Strategic Equity Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of JPMorgan Claverhouse shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

JPMorgan Claverhouse has a net margin of 96.27% compared to Strategic Equity Capital's net margin of 33.47%. JPMorgan Claverhouse's return on equity of 23.65% beat Strategic Equity Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Strategic Equity Capital33.47% 10.95% 10.64%
JPMorgan Claverhouse 96.27%23.65%8.21%

JPMorgan Claverhouse has higher revenue and earnings than Strategic Equity Capital. JPMorgan Claverhouse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Strategic Equity Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Strategic Equity Capital£19.38M6.53£25.65M£38.249.70
JPMorgan Claverhouse£111.53M4.51£57.79M£200.584.61

Strategic Equity Capital has a beta of 0.74126995, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Claverhouse has a beta of 1.0011687, indicating that its stock price is 0% more volatile than the broader market.

Strategic Equity Capital pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. JPMorgan Claverhouse pays an annual dividend of GBX 35.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Strategic Equity Capital pays out 11.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan Claverhouse pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Strategic Equity Capital and JPMorgan Claverhouse tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Equity Capital compare to abrdn Asian Income Fund?

Strategic Equity Capital (LON:SEC) and abrdn Asian Income Fund (LON:AAIF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

abrdn Asian Income Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Strategic Equity Capital. abrdn Asian Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Strategic Equity Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Strategic Equity Capital£19.38M6.53£25.65M£38.249.70
abrdn Asian Income Fund£76.34M6.18£42.37M£50.956.50

Strategic Equity Capital has a beta of 0.74126995, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn Asian Income Fund has a beta of 0.696, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Strategic Equity Capital pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. abrdn Asian Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Strategic Equity Capital pays out 11.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. abrdn Asian Income Fund pays out 36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Strategic Equity Capital had 1 more articles in the media than abrdn Asian Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Strategic Equity Capital and 0 mentions for abrdn Asian Income Fund. Strategic Equity Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled abrdn Asian Income Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Strategic Equity Capital Neutral
abrdn Asian Income Fund Neutral

7.0% of Strategic Equity Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.9% of abrdn Asian Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.7% of Strategic Equity Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of abrdn Asian Income Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

abrdn Asian Income Fund has a net margin of 89.27% compared to Strategic Equity Capital's net margin of 33.47%. abrdn Asian Income Fund's return on equity of 19.40% beat Strategic Equity Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Strategic Equity Capital33.47% 10.95% 10.64%
abrdn Asian Income Fund 89.27%19.40%7.35%

Summary

Strategic Equity Capital beats abrdn Asian Income Fund on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Equity Capital compare to Pacific Assets?

Strategic Equity Capital (LON:SEC) and Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Strategic Equity Capital has a beta of 0.74126995, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.6644512, meaning that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Strategic Equity Capital pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Pacific Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Strategic Equity Capital pays out 11.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pacific Assets pays out -132.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pacific Assets is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Pacific Assets has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Strategic Equity Capital. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Strategic Equity Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Strategic Equity Capital£19.38M6.53£25.65M£38.249.70
Pacific Assets-£4.44M-108.35£42.65M-£3.70N/A

In the previous week, Strategic Equity Capital and Strategic Equity Capital both had 1 articles in the media. Pacific Assets' average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Strategic Equity Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that Pacific Assets is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Strategic Equity Capital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Pacific Assets
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

7.0% of Strategic Equity Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.5% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.7% of Strategic Equity Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Strategic Equity Capital has a net margin of 33.47% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. Strategic Equity Capital's return on equity of 10.95% beat Pacific Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Strategic Equity Capital33.47% 10.95% 10.64%
Pacific Assets -29.27%-0.93%0.07%

Summary

Strategic Equity Capital beats Pacific Assets on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Strategic Equity Capital compare to North American Income Trust?

Strategic Equity Capital (LON:SEC) and North American Income Trust (LON:NAIT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and institutional ownership.

7.0% of Strategic Equity Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.1% of North American Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 13.7% of Strategic Equity Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of North American Income Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Strategic Equity Capital had 1 more articles in the media than North American Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Strategic Equity Capital and 0 mentions for North American Income Trust. Strategic Equity Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled North American Income Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Strategic Equity Capital Neutral
North American Income Trust Neutral

North American Income Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Strategic Equity Capital. Strategic Equity Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Income Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Strategic Equity Capital£19.38M6.53£25.65M£38.249.70
North American Income Trust£37.87M12.97£49.67M£29.3414.59

Strategic Equity Capital pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. North American Income Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Strategic Equity Capital pays out 11.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. North American Income Trust pays out 42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Strategic Equity Capital has a beta of 0.74126995, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, North American Income Trust has a beta of 0.8846345, indicating that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

North American Income Trust has a net margin of 90.75% compared to Strategic Equity Capital's net margin of 33.47%. Strategic Equity Capital's return on equity of 10.95% beat North American Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Strategic Equity Capital33.47% 10.95% 10.64%
North American Income Trust 90.75%7.76%-0.86%

Summary

Strategic Equity Capital and North American Income Trust tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Strategic Equity Capital News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SEC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SEC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricStrategic Equity CapitalAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£126.64M£2.41B£6.02B£2.77B
Dividend Yield1.16%6.02%5.26%6.16%
P/E Ratio9.7059.7129.09366.67
Price / Sales6.532,053.281,087.8986,042.60
Price / Cash8.7060.3384.9827.87
Price / Book0.941.376.677.81
Net Income£25.65M£265.27M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.64%-0.57%-0.63%-0.68%
1 Month Performance-0.75%-0.60%0.12%-1.14%
1 Year Performance1.64%8.87%18.30%66.22%

Strategic Equity Capital Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SEC
Strategic Equity Capital
N/AGBX 371
flat		N/A+2.2%£126.64M£19.38M9.70N/A
POLN
Pollen Street Group
3.3711 of 5 stars		GBX 833
-0.6%		GBX 1,088.67
+30.7%		+5.2%£495.40M£118.52M8.8984
JCH
JPMorgan Claverhouse
N/AGBX 910
-0.2%		N/A+18.9%£495.14M£111.53M4.54N/A
AAIF
abrdn Asian Income Fund
N/AGBX 352
+1.7%		N/A+51.1%£493.10M£76.34M6.91N/A
PAC
Pacific Assets
N/AGBX 431
+0.2%		N/A+24.5%£491.33M-£4.44MN/A1,740

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:SEC) was last updated on 6/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
SpaceX IPO “cancelled”?
SpaceX is approaching what could be a $1.6 trillion IPO - potentially the largest in history. But Louis Navell...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Do NOT Buy SpaceX – Do This Instead
SpaceX just went public - and Whitney Tilson, Harvard MBA and 30-year Wall Street veteran, says buying in coul...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The EPA just put a kill switch on Elon’s empire
A federal EPA permit expires January 2, 2027 - and if Elon Musk's Colossus supercomputer loses power that day,...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Quick favor to ask you
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book at no charge - the same book that sells for $...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Millionaire trader who went 13-for-13 on Trump in 2025 now turns his attention to Elon.
Hedge fund trader Larry Benedict went 13-for-13 in Q1 2025 - not a single losing trade - and finished the year...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
A letter from Shannon Stansberry
Porter Stansberry nearly canceled the entire project. When he first saw the claimed returns - only one down ye...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel