Shearwater Group (SWG) Competitors

Shearwater Group logo
GBX 36.79 -0.21 (-0.57%)
As of 11:01 AM Eastern

SWG vs. PCIP, MMX, IOM, GLAN, and INSG

Should you buy Shearwater Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Shearwater Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Shearwater Group include PCI-PAL (PCIP), Minds and Machines Group (MMX), iomart Group (IOM), Glantus (GLAN), and Insig AI (INSG). These companies are all part of the "software - infrastructure" industry.

How does Shearwater Group compare to PCI-PAL?

Shearwater Group (LON:SWG) and PCI-PAL (LON:PCIP) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

Shearwater Group has a beta of 0.754, suggesting that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PCI-PAL has a beta of 0.598, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

PCI-PAL has a consensus price target of GBX 115, indicating a potential upside of 153.03%. Given PCI-PAL's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe PCI-PAL is more favorable than Shearwater Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Shearwater Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
PCI-PAL
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

PCI-PAL has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Shearwater Group. PCI-PAL is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shearwater Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shearwater Group£23.44M0.37-£2.17M-£12.10N/A
PCI-PAL£23.21M1.42-£1.18M-£0.68N/A

PCI-PAL has a net margin of -2.12% compared to Shearwater Group's net margin of -30.26%. PCI-PAL's return on equity of 31.19% beat Shearwater Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shearwater Group-30.26% -24.02% -3.06%
PCI-PAL -2.12%31.19%-10.01%

5.0% of Shearwater Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.0% of PCI-PAL shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Shearwater Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.4% of PCI-PAL shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Shearwater Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled PCI-PAL'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Shearwater Group Neutral
PCI-PAL Neutral

Summary

PCI-PAL beats Shearwater Group on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shearwater Group compare to Minds and Machines Group?

Minds and Machines Group (LON:MMX) and Shearwater Group (LON:SWG) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, Minds and Machines Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Shearwater Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Minds and Machines Group Neutral
Shearwater Group Neutral

5.0% of Shearwater Group shares are held by institutional investors. 5.6% of Shearwater Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Minds and Machines Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Shearwater Group. Shearwater Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Minds and Machines Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Minds and Machines Group£14.57M0.00N/A£0.30N/A
Shearwater Group£23.44M0.37-£2.17M-£12.10N/A

Minds and Machines Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Shearwater Group's net margin of -30.26%. Minds and Machines Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Shearwater Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Minds and Machines GroupN/A N/A N/A
Shearwater Group -30.26%-24.02%-3.06%

Summary

Minds and Machines Group beats Shearwater Group on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shearwater Group compare to iomart Group?

iomart Group (LON:IOM) and Shearwater Group (LON:SWG) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

Shearwater Group has a net margin of -30.26% compared to iomart Group's net margin of -38.03%. Shearwater Group's return on equity of -24.02% beat iomart Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iomart Group-38.03% -99.34% 3.90%
Shearwater Group -30.26%-24.02%-3.06%

iomart Group has higher revenue and earnings than Shearwater Group. Shearwater Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than iomart Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iomart Group£159.26M0.10£6.79M-£53.80N/A
Shearwater Group£23.44M0.37-£2.17M-£12.10N/A

iomart Group has a beta of 0.854, indicating that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shearwater Group has a beta of 0.754, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

26.4% of iomart Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.0% of Shearwater Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.4% of iomart Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Shearwater Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
iomart Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Shearwater Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, iomart Group had 3 more articles in the media than Shearwater Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for iomart Group and 0 mentions for Shearwater Group. iomart Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Shearwater Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
iomart Group Neutral
Shearwater Group Neutral

Summary

iomart Group beats Shearwater Group on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shearwater Group compare to Glantus?

Shearwater Group (LON:SWG) and Glantus (LON:GLAN) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

Shearwater Group has a net margin of -30.26% compared to Glantus' net margin of -63.48%. Shearwater Group's return on equity of -24.02% beat Glantus' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shearwater Group-30.26% -24.02% -3.06%
Glantus -63.48%-101.18%-9.00%

5.0% of Shearwater Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.7% of Glantus shares are held by institutional investors. 5.6% of Shearwater Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 62.3% of Glantus shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Shearwater Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Glantus'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Shearwater Group Neutral
Glantus Neutral

Shearwater Group has a beta of 0.754, suggesting that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Glantus has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Shearwater Group has higher revenue and earnings than Glantus. Shearwater Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Glantus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shearwater Group£23.44M0.37-£2.17M-£12.10N/A
Glantus£9.72M0.00-£6.17M-£0.14N/A

Summary

Shearwater Group beats Glantus on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shearwater Group compare to Insig AI?

Insig AI (LON:INSG) and Shearwater Group (LON:SWG) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

0.4% of Insig AI shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.0% of Shearwater Group shares are held by institutional investors. 25.8% of Insig AI shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Shearwater Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Shearwater Group has a net margin of -30.26% compared to Insig AI's net margin of -525.23%. Insig AI's return on equity of 252.30% beat Shearwater Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Insig AI-525.23% 252.30% -11.07%
Shearwater Group -30.26%-24.02%-3.06%

Shearwater Group has higher revenue and earnings than Insig AI. Insig AI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shearwater Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Insig AI£801.53K21.26-£18.73M-£1.15N/A
Shearwater Group£23.44M0.37-£2.17M-£12.10N/A

Insig AI has a beta of -0.57, meaning that its share price is 157% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shearwater Group has a beta of 0.754, meaning that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Insig AI's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Shearwater Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Insig AI Neutral
Shearwater Group Neutral

Summary

Shearwater Group beats Insig AI on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Shearwater Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SWG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SWG vs. The Competition

MetricShearwater GroupSoftware IndustryComputer SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£8.77M£684.95M£38.08B£2.78B
Dividend Yield2.50%4.21%3.26%6.16%
P/E Ratio-3.04667.0179.39365.72
Price / Sales0.3716,280.80615.8386,253.69
Price / Cash29.4615.4648.3327.85
Price / Book0.196.399.647.92
Net Income-£2.17M-£18.69M£1.07B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.91%-0.79%-1.41%-0.87%
1 Month Performance-4.44%2.12%0.99%-0.76%
1 Year Performance-21.39%-6.78%159.21%70.67%

Shearwater Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SWG
Shearwater Group
N/AGBX 36.79
-0.6%
N/A-22.8%£8.77M£23.44MN/A94
PCIP
PCI-PAL
N/AGBX 45.86
+0.6%
GBX 115
+150.7%
-13.5%£33.91M£23.21MN/A121
MMX
Minds and Machines Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£23.60M£14.57M29.009,400
IOM
iomart Group
N/AGBX 17.75
-1.4%
N/A-40.2%£20.45M£159.26MN/A480
GLAN
Glantus
N/AN/AN/AN/A£17.13M£9.72MN/A106

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:SWG) was last updated on 6/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners