Free Trial

Shearwater Group (SWG) Competitors

Shearwater Group logo
GBX 38.10 -0.90 (-2.31%)
As of 07:15 AM Eastern

SWG vs. PCIP, MMX, IOM, INSG, and GLAN

Should you buy Shearwater Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Shearwater Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Shearwater Group include PCI-PAL (PCIP), Minds and Machines Group (MMX), iomart Group (IOM), Insig AI (INSG), and Glantus (GLAN). These companies are all part of the "software - infrastructure" industry.

How does Shearwater Group compare to PCI-PAL?

PCI-PAL (LON:PCIP) and Shearwater Group (LON:SWG) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

PCI-PAL presently has a consensus price target of GBX 115, indicating a potential upside of 134.69%. Given PCI-PAL's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe PCI-PAL is more favorable than Shearwater Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PCI-PAL
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Shearwater Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

PCI-PAL has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Shearwater Group. PCI-PAL is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shearwater Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PCI-PAL£23.21M1.53-£1.18M-£0.68N/A
Shearwater Group£23.44M0.39-£2.17M-£12.10N/A

PCI-PAL has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shearwater Group has a beta of 0.832, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

PCI-PAL has a net margin of -2.12% compared to Shearwater Group's net margin of -30.26%. PCI-PAL's return on equity of 31.19% beat Shearwater Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PCI-PAL-2.12% 31.19% -10.01%
Shearwater Group -30.26%-24.02%-3.06%

23.1% of PCI-PAL shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.0% of Shearwater Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.4% of PCI-PAL shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Shearwater Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, PCI-PAL's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Shearwater Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
PCI-PAL Neutral
Shearwater Group Neutral

Summary

PCI-PAL beats Shearwater Group on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shearwater Group compare to Minds and Machines Group?

Minds and Machines Group (LON:MMX) and Shearwater Group (LON:SWG) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

5.0% of Shearwater Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Shearwater Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Minds and Machines Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Shearwater Group. Shearwater Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Minds and Machines Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Minds and Machines Group£14.57M0.00N/A£0.30N/A
Shearwater Group£23.44M0.39-£2.17M-£12.10N/A

Minds and Machines Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Shearwater Group's net margin of -30.26%. Minds and Machines Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Shearwater Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Minds and Machines GroupN/A N/A N/A
Shearwater Group -30.26%-24.02%-3.06%

In the previous week, Minds and Machines Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Shearwater Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Minds and Machines Group Neutral
Shearwater Group Neutral

Summary

Minds and Machines Group beats Shearwater Group on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shearwater Group compare to iomart Group?

iomart Group (LON:IOM) and Shearwater Group (LON:SWG) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, iomart Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Shearwater Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
iomart Group Neutral
Shearwater Group Neutral

26.4% of iomart Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.0% of Shearwater Group shares are held by institutional investors. 23.4% of iomart Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Shearwater Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

iomart Group has a beta of 0.876, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shearwater Group has a beta of 0.832, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
iomart Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Shearwater Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

iomart Group has higher revenue and earnings than Shearwater Group. Shearwater Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than iomart Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iomart Group£159.26M0.17£6.79M-£53.80N/A
Shearwater Group£23.44M0.39-£2.17M-£12.10N/A

Shearwater Group has a net margin of -30.26% compared to iomart Group's net margin of -38.03%. Shearwater Group's return on equity of -24.02% beat iomart Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iomart Group-38.03% -99.34% 3.90%
Shearwater Group -30.26%-24.02%-3.06%

Summary

iomart Group beats Shearwater Group on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shearwater Group compare to Insig AI?

Shearwater Group (LON:SWG) and Insig AI (LON:INSG) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Shearwater Group has higher revenue and earnings than Insig AI. Insig AI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shearwater Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shearwater Group£23.44M0.39-£2.17M-£12.10N/A
Insig AI£801.53K22.83-£18.73M-£1.15N/A

Shearwater Group has a beta of 0.832, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Insig AI has a beta of -0.57, meaning that its stock price is 157% less volatile than the broader market.

5.0% of Shearwater Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of Insig AI shares are held by institutional investors. 5.6% of Shearwater Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.8% of Insig AI shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Shearwater Group has a net margin of -30.26% compared to Insig AI's net margin of -525.23%. Insig AI's return on equity of 252.30% beat Shearwater Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shearwater Group-30.26% -24.02% -3.06%
Insig AI -525.23%252.30%-11.07%

In the previous week, Shearwater Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Insig AI'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Shearwater Group Neutral
Insig AI Neutral

Summary

Shearwater Group beats Insig AI on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Shearwater Group compare to Glantus?

Shearwater Group (LON:SWG) and Glantus (LON:GLAN) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

5.0% of Shearwater Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.7% of Glantus shares are held by institutional investors. 5.6% of Shearwater Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 62.3% of Glantus shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Shearwater Group has a beta of 0.832, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Glantus has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Shearwater Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Glantus'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Shearwater Group Neutral
Glantus Neutral

Shearwater Group has higher revenue and earnings than Glantus. Shearwater Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Glantus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shearwater Group£23.44M0.39-£2.17M-£12.10N/A
Glantus£9.72M0.00-£6.17M-£0.14N/A

Shearwater Group has a net margin of -30.26% compared to Glantus' net margin of -63.48%. Shearwater Group's return on equity of -24.02% beat Glantus' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shearwater Group-30.26% -24.02% -3.06%
Glantus -63.48%-101.18%-9.00%

Summary

Shearwater Group beats Glantus on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Shearwater Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SWG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SWG vs. The Competition

MetricShearwater GroupSoftware IndustryComputer SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£9.08M£724.02M£38.87B£2.79B
Dividend Yield2.50%4.01%3.20%6.09%
P/E Ratio-3.15666.13164.47365.97
Price / Sales0.3916,860.91627.7388,465.78
Price / Cash29.4615.4647.8227.89
Price / Book0.207.069.477.71
Net Income-£2.17M-£18.69M£1.03B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-9.29%1.08%-0.01%0.51%
1 Month Performance-3.13%3.80%9.16%2.49%
1 Year Performance2.07%-5.24%163.88%87.54%

Shearwater Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SWG
Shearwater Group
N/AGBX 38.10
-2.3%
N/A+8.6%£9.08M£23.44MN/A94
PCIP
PCI-PAL
N/AGBX 49
flat
GBX 115
+134.7%
+3.1%£35.50M£23.21MN/A121
MMX
Minds and Machines Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£23.60M£14.57M29.009,400
IOM
iomart Group
N/AGBX 20.20
+0.5%
N/A-17.0%£22.94M£159.26MN/A480
INSG
Insig AI
N/AGBX 15.25
+1.7%
N/A-60.8%£19.25M£801.53KN/A410

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:SWG) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners