Go Pro

RC365 (RCGH) Competitors

RC365 logo
GBX 2.59 +0.09 (+3.60%)
As of 04:38 AM Eastern

RCGH vs. CKT, CRTA, ZOO, GLAN, and ALT

Should you buy RC365 stock or one of its competitors? RC365's main competitors and comparable companies include Checkit (CKT), Cirata (CRTA), ZOO Digital Group (ZOO), Glantus (GLAN), and Altitude Group (ALT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "software" industry.

How does RC365 compare to Checkit?

RC365 (LON:RCGH) and Checkit (LON:CKT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, RC365's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Checkit'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
RC365 Neutral
Checkit Neutral

Checkit has lower revenue, but higher earnings than RC365. Checkit is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RC365, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RC365£19.92M0.27-£382.65M-£8.56N/A
Checkit£13.70M1.72-£4.70M-£2.60N/A

RC365 has a beta of 0.763, indicating that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Checkit has a beta of 0.228, indicating that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

Checkit has a net margin of -20.44% compared to RC365's net margin of -58.19%. RC365's return on equity of 481.17% beat Checkit's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RC365-58.19% 481.17% -4.91%
Checkit -20.44%-32.00%-12.31%

8.2% of Checkit shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.3% of RC365 shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 27.5% of Checkit shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Checkit beats RC365 on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does RC365 compare to Cirata?

RC365 (LON:RCGH) and Cirata (LON:CRTA) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

0.9% of Cirata shares are held by institutional investors. 17.3% of RC365 shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.6% of Cirata shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cirata has a consensus target price of GBX 44, suggesting a potential upside of 298.19%. Given Cirata's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cirata is more favorable than RC365.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
RC365
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Cirata
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

RC365 has a net margin of -58.19% compared to Cirata's net margin of -58.41%. RC365's return on equity of 481.17% beat Cirata's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RC365-58.19% 481.17% -4.91%
Cirata -58.41%-90.39%-126.55%

RC365 has a beta of 0.763, suggesting that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cirata has a beta of 1.606, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, RC365's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Cirata'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
RC365 Neutral
Cirata Neutral

Cirata has lower revenue, but higher earnings than RC365. Cirata is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RC365, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RC365£19.92M0.27-£382.65M-£8.56N/A
Cirata£11.87M1.49-£44.87M-£6.00N/A

Summary

Cirata beats RC365 on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does RC365 compare to ZOO Digital Group?

ZOO Digital Group (LON:ZOO) and RC365 (LON:RCGH) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

ZOO Digital Group has higher revenue and earnings than RC365. ZOO Digital Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RC365, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ZOO Digital Group£42.34M0.37-£27.37M-£3.80N/A
RC365£19.92M0.27-£382.65M-£8.56N/A

ZOO Digital Group has a net margin of -8.68% compared to RC365's net margin of -58.19%. RC365's return on equity of 481.17% beat ZOO Digital Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ZOO Digital Group-8.68% -21.37% -21.28%
RC365 -58.19%481.17%-4.91%

In the previous week, ZOO Digital Group had 1 more articles in the media than RC365. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ZOO Digital Group and 0 mentions for RC365. ZOO Digital Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled RC365'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
ZOO Digital Group Neutral
RC365 Neutral

ZOO Digital Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 22, indicating a potential upside of 37.50%. Given ZOO Digital Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe ZOO Digital Group is more favorable than RC365.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ZOO Digital Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
RC365
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

ZOO Digital Group has a beta of 0.966, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RC365 has a beta of 0.763, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

14.4% of ZOO Digital Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.1% of ZOO Digital Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.3% of RC365 shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

ZOO Digital Group beats RC365 on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does RC365 compare to Glantus?

Glantus (LON:GLAN) and RC365 (LON:RCGH) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

Glantus has higher earnings, but lower revenue than RC365. RC365 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Glantus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Glantus£9.72M0.00-£6.17M-£0.14N/A
RC365£19.92M0.27-£382.65M-£8.56N/A

Glantus has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RC365 has a beta of 0.763, suggesting that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

15.7% of Glantus shares are owned by institutional investors. 62.3% of Glantus shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.3% of RC365 shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Glantus' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled RC365'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Glantus Neutral
RC365 Neutral

RC365 has a net margin of -58.19% compared to Glantus' net margin of -63.48%. RC365's return on equity of 481.17% beat Glantus' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Glantus-63.48% -101.18% -9.00%
RC365 -58.19%481.17%-4.91%

Summary

RC365 beats Glantus on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does RC365 compare to Altitude Group?

Altitude Group (LON:ALT) and RC365 (LON:RCGH) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Altitude Group has a beta of 0.591, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RC365 has a beta of 0.763, suggesting that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Altitude Group has higher revenue and earnings than RC365. Altitude Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RC365, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Altitude Group£44.43M0.38£682.34K-£0.33N/A
RC365£19.92M0.27-£382.65M-£8.56N/A

In the previous week, Altitude Group had 1 more articles in the media than RC365. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Altitude Group and 0 mentions for RC365. Altitude Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled RC365'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Altitude Group Neutral
RC365 Neutral

Altitude Group has a net margin of -1.59% compared to RC365's net margin of -58.19%. RC365's return on equity of 481.17% beat Altitude Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Altitude Group-1.59% -4.69% 1.65%
RC365 -58.19%481.17%-4.91%

6.4% of Altitude Group shares are held by institutional investors. 39.1% of Altitude Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.3% of RC365 shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Altitude Group beats RC365 on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get RC365 News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RCGH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RCGH vs. The Competition

MetricRC365Software IndustryTechnology SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£5.47M£15.72B£29.51B£2.91B
Dividend YieldN/A3.40%2.73%6.18%
P/E Ratio-0.30139.9475.78366.73
Price / Sales0.271,296.40591.9383,698.00
Price / CashN/A45.8947.3227.89
Price / Book0.117.469.306.85
Net Income-£382.65M£437.25M£678.51M£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.90%-0.60%-0.81%5.79%
1 Month Performance-4.78%1.96%-0.99%2.49%
1 Year Performance159.00%5.39%185.90%22.13%

RC365 Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RCGH
RC365
N/AGBX 2.59
+3.6%
N/A+154.8%£5.47M£19.92MN/A11
CKT
Checkit
N/AGBX 19.53
-2.4%
N/A+29.4%£21.09M£13.70MN/A160
CRTA
Cirata
N/AGBX 12.75
-1.9%
GBX 44
+245.1%
-26.4%£20.48M£11.87MN/A112
ZOO
ZOO Digital Group
2.0787 of 5 stars
GBX 17.52
-4.0%
GBX 22
+25.6%
+23.1%£17.94M£42.34MN/A624
GLAN
Glantus
N/AN/AN/AN/A£17.13M£9.72MN/A106

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:RCGH) was last updated on 9/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners