Go Pro

Taptica International (TAP) Competitors

Taptica International logo
GBX 1.26 +0.12 (+10.00%)
As of 08/21/2026 11:13 AM Eastern

TAP vs. QRTR, XLM, TMG, NAH, and ADF

Should you buy Taptica International stock or one of its competitors? Taptica International's main competitors and comparable companies include The Quarto Group (QRTR), XLMedia (XLM), The Mission Group (TMG), NAHL Group (NAH), and Facilities by ADF (ADF). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "media" industry.

How does Taptica International compare to The Quarto Group?

Taptica International (LON:TAP) and The Quarto Group (LON:QRTR) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

Taptica International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Quarto Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Taptica International£3.35M2.81N/A-£0.84N/A
The Quarto Group£126.28M0.00N/A£10.30N/A

1.3% of Taptica International shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Taptica InternationalN/A N/A N/A
The Quarto Group N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Taptica International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled The Quarto Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Taptica International Neutral
The Quarto Group Neutral

Summary

The Quarto Group beats Taptica International on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Taptica International compare to XLMedia?

XLMedia (LON:XLM) and Taptica International (LON:TAP) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

Taptica International has a net margin of 0.00% compared to XLMedia's net margin of -70.58%. Taptica International's return on equity of 0.00% beat XLMedia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
XLMedia-70.58% -26.53% 0.42%
Taptica International N/A N/A N/A

XLMedia pays an annual dividend of GBX 6 per share and has a dividend yield of 91.2%. Taptica International pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. XLMedia pays out -32.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Taptica International pays out -8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. XLMedia is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

7.8% of XLMedia shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of Taptica International shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.3% of XLMedia shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, XLMedia's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Taptica International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
XLMedia Neutral
Taptica International Neutral

Taptica International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than XLMedia. Taptica International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than XLMedia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
XLMedia£39.41M0.54-£74.65M-£18.47N/A
Taptica International£3.35M2.81N/A-£0.84N/A

Summary

XLMedia beats Taptica International on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Taptica International compare to The Mission Group?

The Mission Group (LON:TMG) and Taptica International (LON:TAP) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Taptica International has a net margin of 0.00% compared to The Mission Group's net margin of -11.89%. Taptica International's return on equity of 0.00% beat The Mission Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Mission Group-11.89% -28.86% 1.65%
Taptica International N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, The Mission Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Taptica International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Mission Group Neutral
Taptica International Neutral

Taptica International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than The Mission Group. Taptica International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Mission Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Mission Group£161.58M0.12-£12.03M-£21.30N/A
Taptica International£3.35M2.81N/A-£0.84N/A

The Mission Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 55, indicating a potential upside of 166.67%. Given The Mission Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe The Mission Group is more favorable than Taptica International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
The Mission Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Taptica International
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

30.4% of The Mission Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of Taptica International shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.1% of The Mission Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

The Mission Group beats Taptica International on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Taptica International compare to NAHL Group?

Taptica International (LON:TAP) and NAHL Group (LON:NAH) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

NAHL Group has higher revenue and earnings than Taptica International. Taptica International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NAHL Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Taptica International£3.35M2.81N/A-£0.84N/A
NAHL Group£40.04M0.38£813.06K£6.704.63

NAHL Group has a net margin of 8.13% compared to Taptica International's net margin of 0.00%. NAHL Group's return on equity of 15.04% beat Taptica International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Taptica InternationalN/A N/A N/A
NAHL Group 8.13%15.04%2.81%

In the previous week, NAHL Group had 1 more articles in the media than Taptica International. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for NAHL Group and 0 mentions for Taptica International. Taptica International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled NAHL Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Taptica International Neutral
NAHL Group Neutral

1.3% of Taptica International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.6% of NAHL Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of NAHL Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

NAHL Group beats Taptica International on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Taptica International compare to Facilities by ADF?

Facilities by ADF (LON:ADF) and Taptica International (LON:TAP) are both small-cap communication services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings and profitability.

6.8% of Facilities by ADF shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of Taptica International shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of Facilities by ADF shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Facilities by ADFN/A N/A -1.31%
Taptica International N/A N/A N/A

Facilities by ADF pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.0%. Taptica International pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Facilities by ADF pays out 9,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Taptica International pays out -8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Facilities by ADF's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Taptica International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Facilities by ADF Neutral
Taptica International Neutral

Taptica International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Facilities by ADF. Taptica International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Facilities by ADF, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Facilities by ADF£41.30M0.34-£3.25M£0.011,288.00
Taptica International£3.35M2.81N/A-£0.84N/A

Summary

Facilities by ADF beats Taptica International on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Taptica International News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TAP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TAP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TAP vs. The Competition

MetricTaptica InternationalMedia IndustryCommunication Services SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£9.31M£3.25B£33.00B£2.54B
Dividend Yield3.45%5.43%5.36%6.17%
P/E Ratio-1.5132.26232.34367.57
Price / Sales2.8128.2562.0683,481.74
Price / Cash2.5116.1620.7027.89
Price / Book0.018.9411.417.19
Net IncomeN/A-£45.77M£1.10B£5.89B
7 Day Performance15.31%-1.15%-1.15%0.30%
1 Month Performance4.89%5.16%2.43%3.31%
1 Year Performance35.29%8.45%0.05%22.13%

Taptica International Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TAP
Taptica International
N/AGBX 1.27
+10.0%
N/A+35.3%£9.31M£3.35MN/A16,600
QRTR
The Quarto Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£25.15M£126.28M5.97330
XLM
XLMedia
N/AGBX 6.58
flat
N/AN/A£21.21M£39.41MN/A100
TMG
The Mission Group
N/AGBX 20.55
-2.1%
GBX 55
+167.6%
-1.8%£18.62M£161.58MN/A1,100
NAH
NAHL Group
N/AGBX 33.60
+4.0%
N/A-40.4%£16.28M£40.04M5.01140

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TAP) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners