Free Trial

Tekcapital (TEK) Competitors

Tekcapital logo
GBX 6 +0.15 (+2.56%)
As of 12:02 PM Eastern

TEK vs. GHS, FEN, CRS, ESO, and AUGM

Should you buy Tekcapital stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Tekcapital with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Tekcapital include Gresham House Strategic (GHS), Frenkel Topping Group (FEN), Crystal Amber (CRS), EPE Special Opportunities (ESO), and Augmentum Fintech (AUGM). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does Tekcapital compare to Gresham House Strategic?

Gresham House Strategic (LON:GHS) and Tekcapital (LON:TEK) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

0.8% of Tekcapital shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.4% of Tekcapital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Gresham House Strategic's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tekcapital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gresham House Strategic Neutral
Tekcapital Neutral

Gresham House Strategic has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tekcapital's net margin of -272.31%. Gresham House Strategic's return on equity of 0.00% beat Tekcapital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gresham House StrategicN/A N/A N/A
Tekcapital -272.31%-25.94%14.01%

Tekcapital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gresham House Strategic. Gresham House Strategic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tekcapital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gresham House Strategic£20.59M0.00N/A£477.20N/A
Tekcapital£279.40K55.23£19.73M£3.002.00

Summary

Gresham House Strategic beats Tekcapital on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tekcapital compare to Frenkel Topping Group?

Tekcapital (LON:TEK) and Frenkel Topping Group (LON:FEN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Frenkel Topping Group has a net margin of 10.00% compared to Tekcapital's net margin of -272.31%. Frenkel Topping Group's return on equity of 9.45% beat Tekcapital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tekcapital-272.31% -25.94% 14.01%
Frenkel Topping Group 10.00%9.45%5.96%

Tekcapital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Frenkel Topping Group. Tekcapital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Frenkel Topping Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tekcapital£279.40K55.23£19.73M£3.002.00
Frenkel Topping Group£40.46M1.55£1.05M£3.1016.45

In the previous week, Frenkel Topping Group had 1 more articles in the media than Tekcapital. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Frenkel Topping Group and 0 mentions for Tekcapital. Tekcapital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Frenkel Topping Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tekcapital Neutral
Frenkel Topping Group Neutral

Tekcapital has a beta of 1.025, suggesting that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Frenkel Topping Group has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

0.8% of Tekcapital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.6% of Frenkel Topping Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.4% of Tekcapital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 48.8% of Frenkel Topping Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Frenkel Topping Group beats Tekcapital on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tekcapital compare to Crystal Amber?

Tekcapital (LON:TEK) and Crystal Amber (LON:CRS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

Crystal Amber has a net margin of -29.43% compared to Tekcapital's net margin of -272.31%. Crystal Amber's return on equity of -1.18% beat Tekcapital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tekcapital-272.31% -25.94% 14.01%
Crystal Amber -29.43%-1.18%5.45%

In the previous week, Tekcapital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Crystal Amber'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tekcapital Neutral
Crystal Amber Neutral

Tekcapital has a beta of 1.025, suggesting that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crystal Amber has a beta of 0.211, suggesting that its share price is 79% less volatile than the broader market.

0.8% of Tekcapital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.7% of Crystal Amber shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.4% of Tekcapital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Crystal Amber shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tekcapital has higher revenue and earnings than Crystal Amber. Crystal Amber is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tekcapital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tekcapital£279.40K55.23£19.73M£3.002.00
Crystal Amber-£4.61M-13.58£9.56M-£8.44N/A

Summary

Tekcapital beats Crystal Amber on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tekcapital compare to EPE Special Opportunities?

EPE Special Opportunities (LON:ESO) and Tekcapital (LON:TEK) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

In the previous week, EPE Special Opportunities had 9 more articles in the media than Tekcapital. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for EPE Special Opportunities and 0 mentions for Tekcapital. EPE Special Opportunities' average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Tekcapital's score of 0.00 indicating that EPE Special Opportunities is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
EPE Special Opportunities Very Positive
Tekcapital Neutral

EPE Special Opportunities has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tekcapital has a beta of 1.025, meaning that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

1.2% of EPE Special Opportunities shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of Tekcapital shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of EPE Special Opportunities shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Tekcapital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Tekcapital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than EPE Special Opportunities. Tekcapital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EPE Special Opportunities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EPE Special Opportunities£8.03M7.15£12.80M£22.6710.28
Tekcapital£279.40K55.23£19.73M£3.002.00

EPE Special Opportunities has a net margin of -10.57% compared to Tekcapital's net margin of -272.31%. EPE Special Opportunities' return on equity of -0.41% beat Tekcapital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EPE Special Opportunities-10.57% -0.41% 0.41%
Tekcapital -272.31%-25.94%14.01%

Summary

EPE Special Opportunities beats Tekcapital on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tekcapital compare to Augmentum Fintech?

Augmentum Fintech (LON:AUGM) and Tekcapital (LON:TEK) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk and valuation.

Augmentum Fintech has a beta of 1.230375, suggesting that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tekcapital has a beta of 1.025, suggesting that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Augmentum Fintech has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tekcapital. Augmentum Fintech is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tekcapital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Augmentum Fintech-£6.34M-9.22£178.09M-£7.20N/A
Tekcapital£279.40K55.23£19.73M£3.002.00

Augmentum Fintech has a net margin of 187.74% compared to Tekcapital's net margin of -272.31%. Augmentum Fintech's return on equity of -4.20% beat Tekcapital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Augmentum Fintech187.74% -4.20% N/A
Tekcapital -272.31%-25.94%14.01%

In the previous week, Augmentum Fintech's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tekcapital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Augmentum Fintech Neutral
Tekcapital Neutral

12.8% of Augmentum Fintech shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of Tekcapital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Augmentum Fintech shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of Tekcapital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Tekcapital beats Augmentum Fintech on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tekcapital News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TEK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TEK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TEK vs. The Competition

MetricTekcapitalAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£15.43M£2.44B£5.75B£2.78B
Dividend YieldN/A6.02%5.28%6.12%
P/E Ratio2.0025.8216.34364.57
Price / Sales55.232,108.861,111.2587,497.12
Price / Cash23.3160.1591.3227.85
Price / Book0.171.386.507.74
Net Income£19.73M£264.62M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-1.57%-0.12%0.31%0.23%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-30.46%-6.97%N/A
1 Year Performance-22.88%11.40%19.75%74.69%

Tekcapital Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TEK
Tekcapital
N/AGBX 6
+2.6%
N/A-25.4%£15.43M£279.40K2.006
GHS
Gresham House Strategic
N/AN/AN/AN/A£63.35M£20.59M2.924
FEN
Frenkel Topping Group
N/AGBX 48
-1.5%
N/A+5.3%£58.99M£40.46M15.48307
CRS
Crystal Amber
N/AGBX 98.16
+0.7%
N/A-19.4%£58.44M-£4.61MN/A4,100
ESO
EPE Special Opportunities
N/AGBX 237
+1.3%
N/AN/A£58.41M£8.03M10.45N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:TEK) was last updated on 6/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners