Go Pro

Thunder Power (AIEV) Competitors

Thunder Power logo
$0.16 -0.01 (-8.05%)
As of 09/28/2026 12:22 PM Eastern

AIEV vs. WKHS, ZEV, CENN, FFAI, and LOBO

Should you buy Thunder Power stock or one of its competitors? Thunder Power's main competitors and comparable companies include Workhorse Group (WKHS), Lightning eMotors (ZEV), Cenntro (CENN), Faraday Future Intelligent Electric (FFAI), and Lobo EV Technologies (LOBO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "automobiles" industry.

How does Thunder Power compare to Workhorse Group?

Thunder Power (NASDAQ:AIEV) and Workhorse Group (NASDAQ:WKHS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Thunder Power
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Workhorse Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Thunder Power has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Workhorse Group. Thunder Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workhorse Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thunder PowerN/AN/AN/A-$0.05N/A
Workhorse Group$21.21M1.49-$64.09M-$12.31N/A

In the previous week, Workhorse Group had 2 more articles in the media than Thunder Power. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Workhorse Group and 0 mentions for Thunder Power. Workhorse Group's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Thunder Power's score of 0.00 indicating that Workhorse Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thunder Power Neutral
Workhorse Group Positive

65.0% of Thunder Power shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.0% of Workhorse Group shares are held by institutional investors. 5.1% of Thunder Power shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Workhorse Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Thunder Power has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Workhorse Group has a beta of 2.61, meaning that its share price is 161% more volatile than the broader market.

Thunder Power has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Workhorse Group's net margin of -357.61%. Thunder Power's return on equity of 0.00% beat Workhorse Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thunder PowerN/A N/A N/A
Workhorse Group -357.61%-311.04%-75.40%

Summary

Thunder Power and Workhorse Group tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thunder Power compare to Lightning eMotors?

Thunder Power (NASDAQ:AIEV) and Lightning eMotors (NYSE:ZEV) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Lightning eMotors has higher revenue and earnings than Thunder Power. Thunder Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lightning eMotors, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thunder PowerN/AN/AN/A-$0.05N/A
Lightning eMotors$24.69M0.00$15.17M-$11.19N/A

In the previous week, Thunder Power's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lightning eMotors'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thunder Power Neutral
Lightning eMotors Neutral

Thunder Power has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lightning eMotors has a beta of 2.69, suggesting that its share price is 169% more volatile than the broader market.

Thunder Power has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Lightning eMotors' net margin of -221.51%. Thunder Power's return on equity of 0.00% beat Lightning eMotors' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thunder PowerN/A N/A N/A
Lightning eMotors -221.51%-221.78%-69.89%

65.0% of Thunder Power shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.2% of Lightning eMotors shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.1% of Thunder Power shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Lightning eMotors shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Thunder Power beats Lightning eMotors on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thunder Power compare to Cenntro?

Thunder Power (NASDAQ:AIEV) and Cenntro (NASDAQ:CENN) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Thunder Power
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Cenntro
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Cenntro had 1 more articles in the media than Thunder Power. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cenntro and 0 mentions for Thunder Power. Cenntro's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Thunder Power's score of 0.00 indicating that Cenntro is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thunder Power Neutral
Cenntro Very Positive

65.0% of Thunder Power shares are held by institutional investors. 5.1% of Thunder Power shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Cenntro shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Thunder Power has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cenntro has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

Thunder Power has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cenntro. Thunder Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cenntro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thunder PowerN/AN/AN/A-$0.05N/A
Cenntro$18.08M0.35-$72.98M-$14.26N/A

Thunder Power has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cenntro's net margin of -424.20%. Thunder Power's return on equity of 0.00% beat Cenntro's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thunder PowerN/A N/A N/A
Cenntro -424.20%-142.57%-81.57%

Summary

Cenntro beats Thunder Power on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thunder Power compare to Faraday Future Intelligent Electric?

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric (NASDAQ:FFAI) and Thunder Power (NASDAQ:AIEV) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Faraday Future Intelligent Electric had 11 more articles in the media than Thunder Power. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric and 0 mentions for Thunder Power. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Thunder Power's score of 0.00 indicating that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Positive
Thunder Power Neutral

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 5.65, meaning that its share price is 465% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thunder Power has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

71.7% of Faraday Future Intelligent Electric shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.0% of Thunder Power shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Faraday Future Intelligent Electric shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Thunder Power shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Thunder Power has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric. Thunder Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric$540K10.08-$390.70M-$223.10N/A
Thunder PowerN/AN/AN/A-$0.05N/A

Thunder Power has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net margin of -21,837.97%. Thunder Power's return on equity of 0.00% beat Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric-21,837.97% -2,531.03% -100.65%
Thunder Power N/A N/A N/A

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric presently has a consensus price target of $750.00, suggesting a potential upside of 53,091.49%. Given Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is more favorable than Thunder Power.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Thunder Power
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric beats Thunder Power on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thunder Power compare to Lobo EV Technologies?

Thunder Power (NASDAQ:AIEV) and Lobo EV Technologies (NASDAQ:LOBO) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

65.0% of Thunder Power shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.1% of Thunder Power shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Lobo EV Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Thunder Power. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Lobo EV Technologies and 0 mentions for Thunder Power. Lobo EV Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Thunder Power's score of 0.00 indicating that Lobo EV Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thunder Power Neutral
Lobo EV Technologies Positive

Thunder Power has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lobo EV Technologies.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thunder PowerN/AN/AN/A-$0.05N/A
Lobo EV Technologies$23.22M0.22-$5.48MN/AN/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Thunder Power
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Lobo EV Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Thunder Power has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lobo EV Technologies has a beta of 2.51, indicating that its share price is 151% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thunder PowerN/A N/A N/A
Lobo EV Technologies N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Lobo EV Technologies beats Thunder Power on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Thunder Power News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AIEV and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AIEV and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

AIEV vs. The Competition

MetricThunder PowerAutomobiles IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$8.12M$44.84B$12.46B$13.18B
Dividend YieldN/A2.98%64.44%14.03%
P/E Ratio-3.2011.0344.1825.59
Price / SalesN/A29.7393.5683.42
Price / CashN/A11.6718.4135.00
Price / BookN/A2.163.966.44
Net IncomeN/A$1.24B$446.19M$360.47M
7 Day Performance-3.90%-2.48%-1.02%-1.46%
1 Month Performance-15.75%-6.31%-4.93%-3.75%
1 Year Performance43.88%-23.16%-7.04%3.91%

Thunder Power Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
AIEV
Thunder Power
N/A$0.16
-8.0%
N/A+60.3%$8.12MN/AN/AN/A
WKHS
Workhorse Group
0.2732 of 5 stars
$2.87
-1.4%
N/A-77.6%$31.80M$21.21MN/A148
ZEV
Lightning eMotors
N/AN/AN/AN/A$10.53M$24.69MN/A200
CENN
Cenntro
0.5953 of 5 stars
$4.47
+0.9%
N/A-87.7%$6.49M$18.08MN/A155
FFAI
Faraday Future Intelligent Electric
2.713 of 5 stars
$1.61
+22.9%
$750.00
+46,483.9%
-99.3%$5.05M$540KN/A288

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:AIEV) was last updated on 9/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners