Sphere 3D Competitors

Park City Group (NASDAQ:PCYG) and Sphere 3D (NASDAQ:ANY) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

Volatility & Risk

Park City Group has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sphere 3D has a beta of 2.01, suggesting that its stock price is 101% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Park City Group and Sphere 3D, as reported by MarketBeat.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

33.1% of Park City Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.3% of Sphere 3D shares are owned by institutional investors. 43.0% of Park City Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Sphere 3D shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Park City Group and Sphere 3D's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Park City Group and Sphere 3D's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Park City Group has higher revenue and earnings than Sphere 3D.

Summary

Park City Group beats Sphere 3D on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sphere 3D (NASDAQ:ANY) and Fang (NYSE:SFUN) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Sphere 3D has a beta of 2.01, suggesting that its share price is 101% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fang has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Sphere 3D and Fang, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

1.3% of Sphere 3D shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.4% of Fang shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Sphere 3D shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Sphere 3D and Fang's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Sphere 3D and Fang's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Sphere 3D has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fang.

Summary

Sphere 3D beats Fang on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sphere 3D (NASDAQ:ANY) and Akerna (NASDAQ:KERN) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Sphere 3D has a beta of 2.01, suggesting that its share price is 101% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Akerna has a beta of 2.65, suggesting that its share price is 165% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Sphere 3D and Akerna, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Akerna has a consensus target price of $10.50, suggesting a potential upside of 157.35%. Given Akerna's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Akerna is more favorable than Sphere 3D.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

1.3% of Sphere 3D shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.1% of Akerna shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Sphere 3D shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.7% of Akerna shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Sphere 3D and Akerna's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Sphere 3D and Akerna's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Sphere 3D has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Akerna.

Summary

Akerna beats Sphere 3D on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sphere 3D (NASDAQ:ANY) and CooTek (Cayman) (NYSE:CTK) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Sphere 3D has a beta of 2.01, suggesting that its share price is 101% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CooTek (Cayman) has a beta of -0.02, suggesting that its share price is 102% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Sphere 3D and CooTek (Cayman), as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

1.3% of Sphere 3D shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.9% of CooTek (Cayman) shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Sphere 3D shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Sphere 3D and CooTek (Cayman)'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Sphere 3D and CooTek (Cayman)'s gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Sphere 3D has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CooTek (Cayman).

Sphere 3D (NASDAQ:ANY) and WISeKey International (NASDAQ:WKEY) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Sphere 3D has a beta of 2.01, suggesting that its share price is 101% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, WISeKey International has a beta of 2.14, suggesting that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Sphere 3D and WISeKey International, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

WISeKey International has a consensus target price of $11.00, suggesting a potential upside of 44.74%. Given WISeKey International's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe WISeKey International is more favorable than Sphere 3D.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

1.3% of Sphere 3D shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.0% of WISeKey International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Sphere 3D shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Sphere 3D and WISeKey International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Sphere 3D and WISeKey International's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Sphere 3D has higher earnings, but lower revenue than WISeKey International.

Summary

WISeKey International beats Sphere 3D on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sphere 3D (NASDAQ:ANY) and Phunware (NASDAQ:PHUN) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Sphere 3D has a beta of 2.01, suggesting that its share price is 101% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Phunware has a beta of 12.12, suggesting that its share price is 1,112% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Sphere 3D and Phunware, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Phunware has a consensus target price of $2.50, suggesting a potential upside of 103.25%. Given Phunware's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Phunware is more favorable than Sphere 3D.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

1.3% of Sphere 3D shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.7% of Phunware shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Sphere 3D shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.6% of Phunware shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Sphere 3D and Phunware's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Sphere 3D and Phunware's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Sphere 3D has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Phunware.

Summary

Phunware beats Sphere 3D on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.