Go Pro

Caring Brands (CABR) Competitors

Caring Brands logo
$1.30 +0.02 (+1.56%)
Closing price 07/17/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.30 -0.01 (-0.38%)
As of 07/17/2026 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CABR vs. SLSN, PRPL, UG, NTZ, and ATER

Should you buy Caring Brands stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Caring Brands with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Caring Brands include Solesence (SLSN), Purple Innovation (PRPL), United-Guardian (UG), Natuzzi (NTZ), and Aterian (ATER). These companies are all part of the "consumer goods" industry.

How does Caring Brands compare to Solesence?

Solesence (NASDAQ:SLSN) and Caring Brands (NASDAQ:CABR) are both small-cap consumer goods companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Solesence
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Caring Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Solesence had 1 more articles in the media than Caring Brands. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Solesence and 2 mentions for Caring Brands. Caring Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat Solesence's score of 0.97 indicating that Caring Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Solesence
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Caring Brands
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Solesence has higher revenue and earnings than Caring Brands. Caring Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Solesence, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Solesence$60.40M0.91$1.79M$0.0177.50
Caring BrandsN/AN/A-$6.28M-$0.64N/A

Solesence has a net margin of 1.56% compared to Caring Brands' net margin of 0.00%. Solesence's return on equity of 5.39% beat Caring Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Solesence1.56% 5.39% 1.78%
Caring Brands N/A N/A N/A

70.2% of Solesence shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Solesence shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.6% of Caring Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Solesence beats Caring Brands on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Caring Brands compare to Purple Innovation?

Caring Brands (NASDAQ:CABR) and Purple Innovation (NASDAQ:PRPL) are both small-cap consumer goods companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

88.4% of Purple Innovation shares are held by institutional investors. 14.6% of Caring Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 54.0% of Purple Innovation shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Purple Innovation has a consensus target price of $0.65, suggesting a potential upside of 124.37%. Given Purple Innovation's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Purple Innovation is more favorable than Caring Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Caring Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Purple Innovation
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

Caring Brands has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Purple Innovation's net margin of -13.65%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Caring BrandsN/A N/A N/A
Purple Innovation -13.65%N/A -12.25%

In the previous week, Caring Brands and Caring Brands both had 2 articles in the media. Caring Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat Purple Innovation's score of 1.70 indicating that Caring Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Caring Brands
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Purple Innovation
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Caring Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Purple Innovation. Caring Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Purple Innovation, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Caring BrandsN/AN/A-$6.28M-$0.64N/A
Purple Innovation$468.73M0.07-$51.41M-$0.58N/A

Summary

Purple Innovation beats Caring Brands on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Caring Brands compare to United-Guardian?

Caring Brands (NASDAQ:CABR) and United-Guardian (NASDAQ:UG) are both small-cap consumer goods companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Caring Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
United-Guardian
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

United-Guardian has a net margin of 21.62% compared to Caring Brands' net margin of 0.00%. United-Guardian's return on equity of 21.40% beat Caring Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Caring BrandsN/A N/A N/A
United-Guardian 21.62%21.40%18.40%

In the previous week, United-Guardian had 1 more articles in the media than Caring Brands. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for United-Guardian and 2 mentions for Caring Brands. Caring Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat United-Guardian's score of 0.72 indicating that Caring Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Caring Brands
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
United-Guardian
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

United-Guardian has higher revenue and earnings than Caring Brands. Caring Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United-Guardian, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Caring BrandsN/AN/A-$6.28M-$0.64N/A
United-Guardian$10.55M3.28$2.11M$0.5214.52

23.2% of United-Guardian shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.6% of Caring Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 29.0% of United-Guardian shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

United-Guardian beats Caring Brands on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Caring Brands compare to Natuzzi?

Natuzzi (NYSE:NTZ) and Caring Brands (NASDAQ:CABR) are both small-cap consumer goods companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability and valuation.

6.1% of Natuzzi shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Natuzzi shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.6% of Caring Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Caring Brands has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Natuzzi's net margin of -9.71%. Caring Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Natuzzi's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Natuzzi-9.71% -76.40% -10.54%
Caring Brands N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Caring Brands had 1 more articles in the media than Natuzzi. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Caring Brands and 1 mentions for Natuzzi. Caring Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat Natuzzi's score of 0.99 indicating that Caring Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Natuzzi
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Caring Brands
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Caring Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Natuzzi.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Natuzzi$348.64M0.05-$33.87MN/AN/A
Caring BrandsN/AN/A-$6.28M-$0.64N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Natuzzi
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Caring Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Caring Brands beats Natuzzi on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Caring Brands compare to Aterian?

Caring Brands (NASDAQ:CABR) and Aterian (NASDAQ:ATER) are both small-cap consumer goods companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and profitability.

Caring Brands has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Aterian's net margin of -39.56%. Caring Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Aterian's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Caring BrandsN/A N/A N/A
Aterian -39.56%-82.05%-42.82%

7.0% of Aterian shares are held by institutional investors. 14.6% of Caring Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.5% of Aterian shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Caring Brands had 1 more articles in the media than Aterian. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Caring Brands and 1 mentions for Aterian. Caring Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat Aterian's score of 0.93 indicating that Caring Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Caring Brands
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Aterian
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Caring Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aterian. Caring Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aterian, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Caring BrandsN/AN/A-$6.28M-$0.64N/A
Aterian$68.97M0.20-$18.98M-$2.57N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Caring Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Aterian
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Caring Brands beats Aterian on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Caring Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CABR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CABR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CABR vs. The Competition

MetricCaring BrandsPerfumes, Cosmetics And Other Toilet Preparations IndustryManufacturing SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$11.64M$54.23M$4.41B$12.43B
Dividend YieldN/AN/A34.29%8.84%
P/E Ratio-2.03N/A23.7023.89
Price / SalesN/A4.57135.4690.49
Price / CashN/AN/A164.6360.07
Price / Book8.674.4712.186.18
Net Income-$6.28M-$37.24M$121.47M$331.73M
7 Day Performance-2.99%-1.54%-1.03%-2.04%
1 Month Performance8.33%-5.66%-2.53%-2.14%
1 Year PerformanceN/A461.81%9.97%17.28%

Caring Brands Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CABR
Caring Brands
0.5056 of 5 stars
$1.30
+1.6%
N/AN/A$11.64MN/AN/A4
SLSN
Solesence
1.0512 of 5 stars
$0.83
+29.8%
N/A-81.1%$45.21M$62.06M83.1660
PRPL
Purple Innovation
4.0644 of 5 stars
$0.32
+2.8%
$0.65
+101.9%
-55.4%$34.05M$468.73MN/A1,100
UG
United-Guardian
1.5718 of 5 stars
$7.28
+1.1%
N/A-17.6%$33.10M$10.55M14.0020
NTZ
Natuzzi
1.012 of 5 stars
$1.64
flat
N/A-46.0%$18.06M$348.64MN/A3,193

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CABR) was last updated on 7/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners