Does the media prefer GLNG or CCEC?

In the previous week, Golar LNG had 2 more articles in the media than Capital Clean Energy Carriers. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Golar LNG and 2 mentions for Capital Clean Energy Carriers. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Golar LNG's score of 0.63 indicating that Capital Clean Energy Carriers is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Golar LNG 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Capital Clean Energy Carriers 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Do analysts recommend PTLE or CCEC?

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $24.75, suggesting a potential upside of 9.46%. Given Capital Clean Energy Carriers' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Capital Clean Energy Carriers is more favorable than PTL. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score PTL 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Capital Clean Energy Carriers 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PTLE or CCEC?

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has higher revenue and earnings than PTL. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PTL $71.65M 54.00 -$1.18M N/A N/A Capital Clean Energy Carriers $396.86M 3.33 $170.76M $1.86 12.16

Does the media prefer PTLE or CCEC?

In the previous week, PTL and PTL both had 2 articles in the media. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat PTL's score of 0.73 indicating that Capital Clean Energy Carriers is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment PTL 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Capital Clean Energy Carriers 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Does the media refer more to PAGP or CCEC?

In the previous week, Plains GP had 1 more articles in the media than Capital Clean Energy Carriers. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Plains GP and 2 mentions for Capital Clean Energy Carriers. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Plains GP's score of 0.00 indicating that Capital Clean Energy Carriers is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Plains GP 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Capital Clean Energy Carriers 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Does the media prefer TGS or CCEC?

In the previous week, Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B and Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B both had 2 articles in the media. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B's score of 0.01 indicating that Capital Clean Energy Carriers is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Capital Clean Energy Carriers 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Capital Clean Energy Carriers (CCEC) Competitors

$22.61 -0.04 (-0.18%)

As of 08/21/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

CCEC vs. GLNG, PTLE, PAGP, INSW, and TGS

Should you buy Capital Clean Energy Carriers stock or one of its competitors? Capital Clean Energy Carriers's main competitors and comparable companies include Golar LNG (GLNG), PTL (PTLE), Plains GP (PAGP), International Seaways (INSW), and Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B (TGS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas storage & transportation" industry.

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to Golar LNG?

Golar LNG (NASDAQ:GLNG) and Capital Clean Energy Carriers (NASDAQ:CCEC) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Golar LNG has a beta of 0.05, indicating that its share price is 95% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Golar LNG presently has a consensus price target of $59.30, indicating a potential upside of 14.04%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $24.75, indicating a potential upside of 9.46%. Given Golar LNG's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Golar LNG is more favorable than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Golar LNG	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Golar LNG pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Golar LNG pays out 62.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays out 32.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Golar LNG has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Capital Clean Energy Carriers is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Golar LNG. Capital Clean Energy Carriers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golar LNG, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Golar LNG	$523.38M	10.07	$65.68M	$1.60	32.50
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	$396.86M	3.33	$170.76M	$1.86	12.16

Golar LNG has a net margin of 31.27% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers' net margin of 27.73%. Golar LNG's return on equity of 8.91% beat Capital Clean Energy Carriers' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Golar LNG	31.27%	8.91%	3.75%
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	27.73%	6.55%	2.30%

92.2% of Golar LNG shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Golar LNG shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Golar LNG had 2 more articles in the media than Capital Clean Energy Carriers. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Golar LNG and 2 mentions for Capital Clean Energy Carriers. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Golar LNG's score of 0.63 indicating that Capital Clean Energy Carriers is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Golar LNG	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Summary

Golar LNG beats Capital Clean Energy Carriers on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to PTL?

PTL (NASDAQ:PTLE) and Capital Clean Energy Carriers (NASDAQ:CCEC) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $24.75, suggesting a potential upside of 9.46%. Given Capital Clean Energy Carriers' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Capital Clean Energy Carriers is more favorable than PTL.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PTL	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a net margin of 27.73% compared to PTL's net margin of 0.00%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' return on equity of 6.55% beat PTL's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PTL	N/A	N/A	N/A
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	27.73%	6.55%	2.30%

PTL has a beta of -0.06, suggesting that its stock price is 106% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, PTL and PTL both had 2 articles in the media. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat PTL's score of 0.73 indicating that Capital Clean Energy Carriers is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
PTL	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has higher revenue and earnings than PTL.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PTL	$71.65M	54.00	-$1.18M	N/A	N/A
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	$396.86M	3.33	$170.76M	$1.86	12.16

Summary

Capital Clean Energy Carriers beats PTL on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to Plains GP?

Plains GP (NYSE:PAGP) and Capital Clean Energy Carriers (NASDAQ:CCEC) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Plains GP currently has a consensus target price of $23.55, suggesting a potential downside of 12.27%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus target price of $24.75, suggesting a potential upside of 9.46%. Given Capital Clean Energy Carriers' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Capital Clean Energy Carriers is more favorable than Plains GP.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Plains GP	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.31
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Plains GP pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Plains GP pays out 59.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays out 32.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a net margin of 27.73% compared to Plains GP's net margin of 0.21%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' return on equity of 6.55% beat Plains GP's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Plains GP	0.21%	0.70%	0.36%
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	27.73%	6.55%	2.30%

In the previous week, Plains GP had 1 more articles in the media than Capital Clean Energy Carriers. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Plains GP and 2 mentions for Capital Clean Energy Carriers. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Plains GP's score of 0.00 indicating that Capital Clean Energy Carriers is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Plains GP	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Plains GP. Plains GP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Plains GP	$52.31B	0.10	$103M	$2.79	9.62
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	$396.86M	3.33	$170.76M	$1.86	12.16

88.3% of Plains GP shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.9% of Plains GP shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Plains GP has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Capital Clean Energy Carriers beats Plains GP on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to International Seaways?

International Seaways (NYSE:INSW) and Capital Clean Energy Carriers (NASDAQ:CCEC) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings and institutional ownership.

International Seaways has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Clean Energy Carriers. International Seaways is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
International Seaways	$843.30M	5.83	$309.26M	$15.64	6.35
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	$396.86M	3.33	$170.76M	$1.86	12.16

International Seaways pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. International Seaways pays out 3.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays out 32.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

International Seaways has a net margin of 61.98% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers' net margin of 27.73%. International Seaways' return on equity of 31.75% beat Capital Clean Energy Carriers' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
International Seaways	61.98%	31.75%	23.54%
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	27.73%	6.55%	2.30%

International Seaways has a beta of -0.13, suggesting that its share price is 113% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

67.3% of International Seaways shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of International Seaways shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, International Seaways had 7 more articles in the media than Capital Clean Energy Carriers. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for International Seaways and 2 mentions for Capital Clean Energy Carriers. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat International Seaways' score of 1.01 indicating that Capital Clean Energy Carriers is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
International Seaways	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

International Seaways presently has a consensus target price of $88.00, indicating a potential downside of 11.39%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus target price of $24.75, indicating a potential upside of 9.46%. Given Capital Clean Energy Carriers' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Capital Clean Energy Carriers is more favorable than International Seaways.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
International Seaways	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

International Seaways beats Capital Clean Energy Carriers on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B?

Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B (NYSE:TGS) and Capital Clean Energy Carriers (NASDAQ:CCEC) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a net margin of 27.73% compared to Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B's net margin of 24.56%. Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B's return on equity of 14.03% beat Capital Clean Energy Carriers' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B	24.56%	14.03%	8.87%
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	27.73%	6.55%	2.30%

Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B presently has a consensus price target of $39.00, suggesting a potential upside of 38.69%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $24.75, suggesting a potential upside of 9.46%. Given Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B is more favorable than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B and Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B both had 2 articles in the media. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B's score of 0.01 indicating that Capital Clean Energy Carriers is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

3.3% of Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Clean Energy Carriers. Capital Clean Energy Carriers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B	$1.41B	3.01	$336.69M	$2.21	12.72
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	$396.86M	3.33	$170.76M	$1.86	12.16

Summary

Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B beats Capital Clean Energy Carriers on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Capital Clean Energy Carriers News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CCEC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CCEC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Capital Clean Energy Carriers	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry	Energy Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$1.32B	$11.47B	$10.02B	$12.77B
Dividend Yield	2.63%	11.46%	11.68%	11.08%
P/E Ratio	12.16	17.19	20.62	24.24
Price / Sales	3.33	467.05	383.42	129.21
Price / Cash	5.83	39.83	36.19	53.23
Price / Book	0.85	3.21	3.03	6.38
Net Income	$170.76M	$5.27B	$4.33B	$348.73M
7 Day Performance	N/A	2.69%	1.89%	0.08%
1 Month Performance	-0.24%	4.77%	4.25%	2.91%
1 Year Performance	4.72%	37.44%	38.88%	17.19%

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CCEC Capital Clean Energy Carriers	4.9354 of 5 stars	$22.61 -0.2%	$24.75 +9.5%	+7.1%	$1.32B	$396.86M	12.16	N/A	Positive News
GLNG Golar LNG	2.7377 of 5 stars	$50.84 +0.3%	$58.70 +15.5%	+20.2%	$5.14B	$393.52M	36.84	1,700
PTLE PTL	0.9425 of 5 stars	$8.90 -11.1%	N/A	-41.7%	$5.02B	$71.65M	N/A	N/A	Gap Down
PAGP Plains GP	1.8305 of 5 stars	$25.11 -0.2%	$23.36 -7.0%	+41.9%	$4.97B	$45.26B	47.38	4,100	Dividend Announcement Analyst Forecast
INSW International Seaways	3.1638 of 5 stars	$89.08 -1.5%	$86.00 -3.5%	+123.8%	$4.48B	$843.30M	5.70	2,763	Positive News Insider Trade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CCEC) was last updated on 8/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers (CCEC) Competitors

CCEC vs. GLNG, PTLE, PAGP, INSW, and TGS

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to Golar LNG?

Summary

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to PTL?

Summary

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to Plains GP?

Summary

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to International Seaways?

Summary

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CCEC vs. The Competition

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Capital Clean Energy Carriers (CCEC) Competitors

CCEC vs. GLNG, PTLE, PAGP, INSW, and TGS

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to Golar LNG?

Which has more risk & volatility, GLNG or CCEC?

Do analysts recommend GLNG or CCEC?

Is GLNG or CCEC a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, GLNG or CCEC?

Is GLNG or CCEC more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in GLNG or CCEC?

Does the media prefer GLNG or CCEC?

Summary

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to PTL?

Do analysts recommend PTLE or CCEC?

Is PTLE or CCEC more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, PTLE or CCEC?

Does the media prefer PTLE or CCEC?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PTLE or CCEC?

Summary

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to Plains GP?

Do analysts prefer PAGP or CCEC?

Is PAGP or CCEC a better dividend stock?

Is PAGP or CCEC more profitable?

Does the media refer more to PAGP or CCEC?

Which has better earnings & valuation, PAGP or CCEC?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of PAGP or CCEC?

Which has more volatility & risk, PAGP or CCEC?

Summary

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to International Seaways?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, INSW or CCEC?

Is INSW or CCEC a better dividend stock?

Is INSW or CCEC more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, INSW or CCEC?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in INSW or CCEC?

Does the media favor INSW or CCEC?

Do analysts rate INSW or CCEC?

Summary

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B?

Is TGS or CCEC more profitable?

Do analysts prefer TGS or CCEC?

Does the media prefer TGS or CCEC?

Which has more volatility & risk, TGS or CCEC?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of TGS or CCEC?

Which has better earnings & valuation, TGS or CCEC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CCEC vs. The Competition

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools