Does the media refer more to CCEC or GLNG?

In the previous week, Capital Clean Energy Carriers had 7 more articles in the media than Golar LNG. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Capital Clean Energy Carriers and 1 mentions for Golar LNG. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Golar LNG's score of -0.15 indicating that Capital Clean Energy Carriers is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Capital Clean Energy Carriers 7 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Golar LNG 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to HAFN or CCEC?

In the previous week, Hafnia had 1 more articles in the media than Capital Clean Energy Carriers. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Hafnia and 8 mentions for Capital Clean Energy Carriers. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Hafnia's score of 0.20 indicating that Capital Clean Energy Carriers is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hafnia 1 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Capital Clean Energy Carriers 7 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer STNG or CCEC?

In the previous week, Scorpio Tankers had 3 more articles in the media than Capital Clean Energy Carriers. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Scorpio Tankers and 8 mentions for Capital Clean Energy Carriers. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Scorpio Tankers' score of 0.68 indicating that Capital Clean Energy Carriers is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Scorpio Tankers 3 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Capital Clean Energy Carriers 7 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Capital Clean Energy Carriers (CCEC) Competitors

$20.99 -0.71 (-3.28%)

Closing price 03:58 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$20.99 +0.00 (+0.00%)

As of 04:10 PM Eastern

Compare

CCEC vs. GLNG, HAFN, STNG, TGS, and SUNC

Should you buy Capital Clean Energy Carriers stock or one of its competitors? Capital Clean Energy Carriers's main competitors and comparable companies include Golar LNG (GLNG), Hafnia (HAFN), Scorpio Tankers (STNG), Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B (TGS), and SunocoCorp (SUNC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas storage & transportation" industry.

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to Golar LNG?

Capital Clean Energy Carriers (NASDAQ:CCEC) and Golar LNG (NASDAQ:GLNG) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Golar LNG. Capital Clean Energy Carriers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golar LNG, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	$392.71M	3.13	$170.76M	$1.86	11.33
Golar LNG	$393.52M	12.48	$65.68M	$1.60	30.30

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golar LNG has a beta of 0.13, suggesting that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Golar LNG pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays out 32.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Golar LNG pays out 62.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Golar LNG has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Capital Clean Energy Carriers is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

92.2% of Golar LNG shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Golar LNG shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Capital Clean Energy Carriers had 7 more articles in the media than Golar LNG. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Capital Clean Energy Carriers and 1 mentions for Golar LNG. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Golar LNG's score of -0.15 indicating that Capital Clean Energy Carriers is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	7 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Golar LNG	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Capital Clean Energy Carriers currently has a consensus target price of $24.75, indicating a potential upside of 17.47%. Golar LNG has a consensus target price of $64.25, indicating a potential upside of 32.53%. Given Golar LNG's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Golar LNG is more favorable than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
Golar LNG	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

Golar LNG has a net margin of 31.27% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers' net margin of 27.73%. Golar LNG's return on equity of 8.91% beat Capital Clean Energy Carriers' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	27.73%	6.55%	2.30%
Golar LNG	31.27%	8.91%	3.75%

Summary

Golar LNG beats Capital Clean Energy Carriers on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to Hafnia?

Hafnia (NYSE:HAFN) and Capital Clean Energy Carriers (NASDAQ:CCEC) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Hafnia has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Clean Energy Carriers. Hafnia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hafnia	$955.87M	5.43	$339.68M	$1.32	7.67
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	$392.71M	3.13	$170.76M	$1.86	11.33

Hafnia has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Hafnia has a net margin of 56.72% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers' net margin of 27.73%. Hafnia's return on equity of 26.74% beat Capital Clean Energy Carriers' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hafnia	56.72%	26.74%	17.14%
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	27.73%	6.55%	2.30%

Hafnia presently has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 18.52%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus target price of $24.75, suggesting a potential upside of 17.47%. Given Hafnia's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Hafnia is more favorable than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hafnia	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60

In the previous week, Hafnia had 1 more articles in the media than Capital Clean Energy Carriers. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Hafnia and 8 mentions for Capital Clean Energy Carriers. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Hafnia's score of 0.20 indicating that Capital Clean Energy Carriers is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hafnia	1 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	7 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Hafnia pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.8%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Hafnia pays out 151.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays out 32.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Hafnia beats Capital Clean Energy Carriers on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to Scorpio Tankers?

Scorpio Tankers (NYSE:STNG) and Capital Clean Energy Carriers (NASDAQ:CCEC) are both energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and risk.

Scorpio Tankers pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Scorpio Tankers pays out 11.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays out 32.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Scorpio Tankers has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Scorpio Tankers has a beta of -0.17, meaning that its stock price is 117% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Scorpio Tankers has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Clean Energy Carriers. Scorpio Tankers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Scorpio Tankers	$938.22M	4.59	$344.29M	$16.01	5.34
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	$392.71M	3.13	$170.76M	$1.86	11.33

54.6% of Scorpio Tankers shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.3% of Scorpio Tankers shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Scorpio Tankers has a net margin of 67.16% compared to Capital Clean Energy Carriers' net margin of 27.73%. Scorpio Tankers' return on equity of 16.43% beat Capital Clean Energy Carriers' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Scorpio Tankers	67.16%	16.43%	13.14%
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	27.73%	6.55%	2.30%

In the previous week, Scorpio Tankers had 3 more articles in the media than Capital Clean Energy Carriers. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Scorpio Tankers and 8 mentions for Capital Clean Energy Carriers. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Scorpio Tankers' score of 0.68 indicating that Capital Clean Energy Carriers is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Scorpio Tankers	3 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	7 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Scorpio Tankers currently has a consensus price target of $91.57, indicating a potential upside of 7.12%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a consensus price target of $24.75, indicating a potential upside of 17.47%. Given Capital Clean Energy Carriers' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Capital Clean Energy Carriers is more favorable than Scorpio Tankers.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Scorpio Tankers	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.36
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60

Summary

Scorpio Tankers beats Capital Clean Energy Carriers on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B?

Capital Clean Energy Carriers (NASDAQ:CCEC) and Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B (NYSE:TGS) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a net margin of 27.73% compared to Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B's net margin of 27.38%. Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B's return on equity of 16.29% beat Capital Clean Energy Carriers' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	27.73%	6.55%	2.30%
Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B	27.38%	16.29%	10.07%

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B has higher revenue and earnings than Capital Clean Energy Carriers. Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	$392.71M	3.13	$170.76M	$1.86	11.33
Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B	$1.41B	2.67	$336.69M	$2.61	9.54

Capital Clean Energy Carriers presently has a consensus target price of $24.75, indicating a potential upside of 17.47%. Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B has a consensus target price of $39.00, indicating a potential upside of 56.58%. Given Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B is more favorable than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

In the previous week, Capital Clean Energy Carriers had 5 more articles in the media than Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Capital Clean Energy Carriers and 3 mentions for Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B's score of 0.88 indicating that Capital Clean Energy Carriers is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	7 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

3.3% of Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Capital Clean Energy Carriers beats Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to SunocoCorp?

Capital Clean Energy Carriers (NASDAQ:CCEC) and SunocoCorp (NYSE:SUNC) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. SunocoCorp pays an annual dividend of $4.01 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays out 32.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SunocoCorp pays out 138.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Capital Clean Energy Carriers had 8 more articles in the media than SunocoCorp. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Capital Clean Energy Carriers and 0 mentions for SunocoCorp. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat SunocoCorp's score of 0.00 indicating that Capital Clean Energy Carriers is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	Positive
SunocoCorp	Neutral

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has higher earnings, but lower revenue than SunocoCorp. Capital Clean Energy Carriers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SunocoCorp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	$392.71M	3.13	$170.76M	$1.86	11.33
SunocoCorp	$25.20B	0.15	-$5M	$2.89	26.16

Capital Clean Energy Carriers presently has a consensus price target of $24.75, indicating a potential upside of 17.47%. SunocoCorp has a consensus price target of $81.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.13%. Given Capital Clean Energy Carriers' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Capital Clean Energy Carriers is more favorable than SunocoCorp.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
SunocoCorp	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a net margin of 27.73% compared to SunocoCorp's net margin of 0.00%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers' return on equity of 6.55% beat SunocoCorp's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Capital Clean Energy Carriers	27.73%	6.55%	2.30%
SunocoCorp	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Capital Clean Energy Carriers beats SunocoCorp on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Capital Clean Energy Carriers News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CCEC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CCEC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Capital Clean Energy Carriers	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry	Energy Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$1.23B	$11.26B	$9.82B	$13.24B
Dividend Yield	3.20%	10.26%	10.71%	15.88%
P/E Ratio	11.28	17.28	20.30	26.05
Price / Sales	3.12	624.04	509.32	89.39
Price / Cash	4.83	40.92	36.93	51.25
Price / Book	0.82	4.44	4.01	6.31
Net Income	$170.76M	$5.28B	$4.35B	$361.43M
7 Day Performance	-2.96%	-1.14%	-1.15%	-1.67%
1 Month Performance	-7.33%	-3.48%	-3.65%	-3.94%
1 Year Performance	-3.76%	28.84%	29.53%	2.77%

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CCEC Capital Clean Energy Carriers	4.9873 of 5 stars	$20.99 -3.3%	$24.75 +17.9%	-1.6%	$1.23B	$392.71M	11.28	5,000	News Coverage Positive News
GLNG Golar LNG	2.9335 of 5 stars	$48.23 -1.1%	$64.25 +33.2%	+20.4%	$4.94B	$393.52M	30.14	1,700
HAFN Hafnia	4.1009 of 5 stars	$9.68 +6.0%	$12.00 +24.0%	+61.8%	$4.68B	$955.87M	7.33	4,876	Analyst Upgrade
STNG Scorpio Tankers	3.2982 of 5 stars	$83.63 +0.5%	$91.57 +9.5%	+51.6%	$4.19B	$1.22B	5.22	24
TGS Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B	4.1604 of 5 stars	$25.69 -0.7%	$39.00 +51.8%	+22.8%	$3.89B	$1.84T	9.84	1,187	Options Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CCEC) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Capital Clean Energy Carriers (CCEC) Competitors

CCEC vs. GLNG, HAFN, STNG, TGS, and SUNC

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to Golar LNG?

Summary

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to Hafnia?

Summary

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to Scorpio Tankers?

Summary

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B?

Summary

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to SunocoCorp?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CCEC vs. The Competition

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Capital Clean Energy Carriers (CCEC) Competitors

CCEC vs. GLNG, HAFN, STNG, TGS, and SUNC

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to Golar LNG?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, CCEC or GLNG?

Which has more volatility & risk, CCEC or GLNG?

Is CCEC or GLNG a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in CCEC or GLNG?

Does the media refer more to CCEC or GLNG?

Do analysts prefer CCEC or GLNG?

Is CCEC or GLNG more profitable?

Summary

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to Hafnia?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, HAFN or CCEC?

Which has more volatility and risk, HAFN or CCEC?

Is HAFN or CCEC more profitable?

Do analysts rate HAFN or CCEC?

Does the media refer more to HAFN or CCEC?

Is HAFN or CCEC a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to Scorpio Tankers?

Is STNG or CCEC a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, STNG or CCEC?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, STNG or CCEC?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in STNG or CCEC?

Is STNG or CCEC more profitable?

Does the media prefer STNG or CCEC?

Do analysts rate STNG or CCEC?

Summary

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to Transportadora De Gas Sa Ord B?

Is CCEC or TGS more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, CCEC or TGS?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, CCEC or TGS?

Do analysts recommend CCEC or TGS?

Does the media refer more to CCEC or TGS?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in CCEC or TGS?

Summary

How does Capital Clean Energy Carriers compare to SunocoCorp?

Is CCEC or SUNC a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor CCEC or SUNC?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CCEC or SUNC?

Do analysts prefer CCEC or SUNC?

Is CCEC or SUNC more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CCEC vs. The Competition

Capital Clean Energy Carriers Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools