Coca-Cola Consolidated Competitors

Molson Coors Beverage (NYSE:TAP) and Coca-Cola Consolidated (NASDAQ:COKE) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

40.0% of Molson Coors Beverage shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.2% of Coca-Cola Consolidated shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Molson Coors Beverage shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Molson Coors Beverage and Coca-Cola Consolidated's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Molson Coors Beverage has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Coca-Cola Consolidated has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Molson Coors Beverage and Coca-Cola Consolidated, as reported by MarketBeat.

Molson Coors Beverage presently has a consensus price target of $49.75, indicating a potential downside of 6.52%. Given Molson Coors Beverage's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Molson Coors Beverage is more favorable than Coca-Cola Consolidated.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Molson Coors Beverage and Coca-Cola Consolidated's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Molson Coors Beverage has higher revenue and earnings than Coca-Cola Consolidated.

Summary

Molson Coors Beverage beats Coca-Cola Consolidated on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Newell Brands (NASDAQ:NWL) and Coca-Cola Consolidated (NASDAQ:COKE) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Newell Brands and Coca-Cola Consolidated's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Newell Brands and Coca-Cola Consolidated's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Newell Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Coca-Cola Consolidated.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

86.5% of Newell Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.2% of Coca-Cola Consolidated shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Newell Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Newell Brands and Coca-Cola Consolidated, as reported by MarketBeat.

Newell Brands presently has a consensus price target of $22.60, indicating a potential downside of 16.30%. Given Newell Brands' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Newell Brands is more favorable than Coca-Cola Consolidated.

Risk and Volatility

Newell Brands has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Coca-Cola Consolidated has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Newell Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Coca-Cola Consolidated pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Newell Brands pays out 54.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Newell Brands has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Coca-Cola Consolidated has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Newell Brands beats Coca-Cola Consolidated on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Coca-Cola Consolidated (NASDAQ:COKE) and Darling Ingredients (NYSE:DAR) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Coca-Cola Consolidated and Darling Ingredients' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Coca-Cola Consolidated and Darling Ingredients' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Darling Ingredients has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Coca-Cola Consolidated.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

36.2% of Coca-Cola Consolidated shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Darling Ingredients shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of Darling Ingredients shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Coca-Cola Consolidated and Darling Ingredients, as provided by MarketBeat.

Darling Ingredients has a consensus target price of $68.90, indicating a potential downside of 1.98%. Given Darling Ingredients' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Darling Ingredients is more favorable than Coca-Cola Consolidated.

Volatility & Risk

Coca-Cola Consolidated has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Darling Ingredients has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Darling Ingredients beats Coca-Cola Consolidated on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Coca-Cola Consolidated (NASDAQ:COKE) and Coca-Cola FEMSA (NYSE:KOF) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Coca-Cola Consolidated and Coca-Cola FEMSA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Coca-Cola Consolidated and Coca-Cola FEMSA's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Coca-Cola FEMSA has higher revenue and earnings than Coca-Cola Consolidated.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

36.2% of Coca-Cola Consolidated shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.4% of Coca-Cola FEMSA shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Coca-Cola FEMSA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Coca-Cola Consolidated and Coca-Cola FEMSA, as provided by MarketBeat.

Coca-Cola FEMSA has a consensus target price of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.26%. Given Coca-Cola FEMSA's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Coca-Cola FEMSA is more favorable than Coca-Cola Consolidated.

Risk and Volatility

Coca-Cola Consolidated has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Coca-Cola FEMSA has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Coca-Cola Consolidated pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Coca-Cola FEMSA pays an annual dividend of $2.31 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Coca-Cola FEMSA pays out 77.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Coca-Cola Consolidated has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Coca-Cola Consolidated (NASDAQ:COKE) and Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Coca-Cola Consolidated and Aramark's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Coca-Cola Consolidated and Aramark's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Coca-Cola Consolidated has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aramark.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

36.2% of Coca-Cola Consolidated shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.5% of Aramark shares are held by institutional investors. 10.3% of Aramark shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Coca-Cola Consolidated and Aramark, as provided by MarketBeat.

Aramark has a consensus target price of $32.3077, indicating a potential downside of 16.43%. Given Aramark's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Aramark is more favorable than Coca-Cola Consolidated.

Risk and Volatility

Coca-Cola Consolidated has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.88, meaning that its stock price is 88% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Coca-Cola Consolidated pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Aramark pays out -258.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Coca-Cola Consolidated has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Aramark has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Aramark beats Coca-Cola Consolidated on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Coca-Cola Consolidated (NASDAQ:COKE) and Albertsons Companies (NYSE:ACI) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Dividends

Coca-Cola Consolidated pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Albertsons Companies pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Coca-Cola Consolidated has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Coca-Cola Consolidated and Albertsons Companies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Coca-Cola Consolidated and Albertsons Companies' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Albertsons Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Coca-Cola Consolidated.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Coca-Cola Consolidated and Albertsons Companies, as provided by MarketBeat.

Albertsons Companies has a consensus target price of $19.75, indicating a potential downside of 0.20%. Given Albertsons Companies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Albertsons Companies is more favorable than Coca-Cola Consolidated.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

36.2% of Coca-Cola Consolidated shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.6% of Albertsons Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Albertsons Companies beats Coca-Cola Consolidated on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.