Commercial Vehicle Group (CVGI) Competitors

Commercial Vehicle Group currently has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.18%. Titan International has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 57.46%. Given Titan International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Titan International is more favorable than Commercial Vehicle Group.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Titan International has a beta of 1.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Commercial Vehicle Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Titan International. Commercial Vehicle Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Titan International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of -3.51% compared to Titan International's net margin of -4.72%. Titan International's return on equity of -3.00% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity.

In the previous week, Titan International had 26 more articles in the media than Commercial Vehicle Group. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Titan International and 6 mentions for Commercial Vehicle Group. Commercial Vehicle Group's average media sentiment score of 0.13 beat Titan International's score of -0.13 indicating that Commercial Vehicle Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

72.3% of Commercial Vehicle Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Titan International shares are held by institutional investors. 4.2% of Commercial Vehicle Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 32.5% of Titan International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Manitowoc has a net margin of 0.32% compared to Commercial Vehicle Group's net margin of -3.51%. Manitowoc's return on equity of 1.71% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity.

In the previous week, Commercial Vehicle Group had 4 more articles in the media than Manitowoc. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Commercial Vehicle Group and 2 mentions for Manitowoc. Commercial Vehicle Group's average media sentiment score of 0.13 beat Manitowoc's score of 0.00 indicating that Commercial Vehicle Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

72.3% of Commercial Vehicle Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.7% of Manitowoc shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.2% of Commercial Vehicle Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Manitowoc shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Manitowoc has a beta of 1.81, suggesting that its share price is 81% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Commercial Vehicle Group presently has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.18%. Manitowoc has a consensus target price of $10.50, suggesting a potential downside of 23.20%. Given Commercial Vehicle Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more favorable than Manitowoc.

Manitowoc has higher revenue and earnings than Commercial Vehicle Group. Commercial Vehicle Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Manitowoc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of -3.51% compared to Wabash National's net margin of -4.41%. Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -11.74% beat Wabash National's return on equity.

In the previous week, Wabash National had 7 more articles in the media than Commercial Vehicle Group. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Wabash National and 6 mentions for Commercial Vehicle Group. Commercial Vehicle Group's average media sentiment score of 0.13 beat Wabash National's score of -0.34 indicating that Commercial Vehicle Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

72.3% of Commercial Vehicle Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.1% of Wabash National shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.2% of Commercial Vehicle Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Wabash National shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Wabash National has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Commercial Vehicle Group presently has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.18%. Wabash National has a consensus target price of $8.75, suggesting a potential upside of 15.22%. Given Commercial Vehicle Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more favorable than Wabash National.

Wabash National has higher revenue and earnings than Commercial Vehicle Group. Commercial Vehicle Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wabash National, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Twin Disc has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Commercial Vehicle Group. Commercial Vehicle Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Twin Disc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.18%. Given Commercial Vehicle Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more favorable than Twin Disc.

65.3% of Twin Disc shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.3% of Commercial Vehicle Group shares are held by institutional investors. 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Commercial Vehicle Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Commercial Vehicle Group had 2 more articles in the media than Twin Disc. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Commercial Vehicle Group and 4 mentions for Twin Disc. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Commercial Vehicle Group's score of 0.13 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Twin Disc has a net margin of 6.26% compared to Commercial Vehicle Group's net margin of -3.51%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 0.02% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity.