Do analysts rate LNN or TWIN?

Lindsay presently has a consensus price target of $113.00, indicating a potential downside of 9.28%. Given Lindsay's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Lindsay is more favorable than Twin Disc. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Lindsay 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Twin Disc 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Which has better valuation and earnings, LNN or TWIN?

Lindsay has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lindsay, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Lindsay $676.37M 1.92 $74.05M $5.46 22.81 Twin Disc $340.74M 1.00 -$1.89M $1.84 12.79

Is LNN or TWIN more profitable?

Lindsay has a net margin of 9.25% compared to Twin Disc's net margin of 7.32%. Lindsay's return on equity of 11.28% beat Twin Disc's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Lindsay 9.25% 11.28% 7.04% Twin Disc 7.32% 2.77% 1.29%

Does the media prefer LNN or TWIN?

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 2 more articles in the media than Lindsay. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Twin Disc and 2 mentions for Lindsay. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Lindsay's score of 0.00 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lindsay 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Twin Disc 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend PLOW or TWIN?

Douglas Dynamics presently has a consensus price target of $54.67, indicating a potential upside of 0.81%. Given Douglas Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Douglas Dynamics is more favorable than Twin Disc. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Douglas Dynamics 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 2 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.50 Twin Disc 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, PLOW or TWIN?

Douglas Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Douglas Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Douglas Dynamics $656.05M 1.91 $46.90M $2.22 24.43 Twin Disc $340.74M 1.00 -$1.89M $1.84 12.79

Does the media prefer PLOW or TWIN?

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 3 more articles in the media than Douglas Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Twin Disc and 1 mentions for Douglas Dynamics. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Douglas Dynamics' score of 1.05 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Douglas Dynamics 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Twin Disc 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate MLR or TWIN?

Miller Industries presently has a consensus target price of $50.00, indicating a potential downside of 4.87%. Given Miller Industries' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Miller Industries is more favorable than Twin Disc. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Miller Industries 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Twin Disc 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Which has better valuation and earnings, MLR or TWIN?

Miller Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Miller Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Miller Industries $790.27M 0.76 $23.01M $1.34 39.23 Twin Disc $340.74M 1.00 -$1.89M $1.84 12.79

Does the media favor MLR or TWIN?

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 1 more articles in the media than Miller Industries. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Twin Disc and 3 mentions for Miller Industries. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Miller Industries' score of 0.31 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Miller Industries 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Twin Disc 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate WNC or TWIN?

Wabash National currently has a consensus price target of $14.50, indicating a potential upside of 4.94%. Given Wabash National's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Wabash National is more favorable than Twin Disc. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Wabash National 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Twin Disc 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, WNC or TWIN?

Wabash National has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Wabash National is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Twin Disc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Wabash National $1.54B 0.36 $211.45M -$1.60 N/A Twin Disc $340.74M 1.00 -$1.89M $1.84 12.79

Does the media favor WNC or TWIN?

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 3 more articles in the media than Wabash National. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Twin Disc and 1 mentions for Wabash National. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Wabash National's score of 1.14 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Wabash National 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Twin Disc 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate TWIN or TWI?

Titan International has a consensus price target of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 66.54%. Given Titan International's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Titan International is more favorable than Twin Disc. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Twin Disc 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Titan International 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Twin Disc (TWIN) Competitors

$23.54 -0.65 (-2.69%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$23.62 +0.09 (+0.36%)

As of 05:29 PM Eastern

Compare

TWIN vs. LNN, PLOW, MLR, WNC, and TWI

Should you buy Twin Disc stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Twin Disc with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Twin Disc include Lindsay (LNN), Douglas Dynamics (PLOW), Miller Industries (MLR), Wabash National (WNC), and Titan International (TWI). These companies are all part of the "construction & farm machinery & heavy trucks" industry.

How does Twin Disc compare to Lindsay?

Lindsay (NYSE:LNN) and Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability and media sentiment.

Lindsay has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Twin Disc has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Lindsay pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Lindsay pays out 27.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 8.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lindsay has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years. Lindsay is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Lindsay has a net margin of 9.25% compared to Twin Disc's net margin of 7.32%. Lindsay's return on equity of 11.28% beat Twin Disc's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lindsay	9.25%	11.28%	7.04%
Twin Disc	7.32%	2.77%	1.29%

Lindsay has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lindsay, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lindsay	$676.37M	1.92	$74.05M	$5.46	22.81
Twin Disc	$340.74M	1.00	-$1.89M	$1.84	12.79

89.9% of Lindsay shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of Twin Disc shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Lindsay shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lindsay presently has a consensus price target of $113.00, indicating a potential downside of 9.28%. Given Lindsay's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Lindsay is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lindsay	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Twin Disc	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 2 more articles in the media than Lindsay. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Twin Disc and 2 mentions for Lindsay. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Lindsay's score of 0.00 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lindsay	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Twin Disc	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Lindsay beats Twin Disc on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Douglas Dynamics?

Douglas Dynamics (NYSE:PLOW) and Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) are both small-cap construction & farm machinery & heavy trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

91.9% of Douglas Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of Twin Disc shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Douglas Dynamics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 3 more articles in the media than Douglas Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Twin Disc and 1 mentions for Douglas Dynamics. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Douglas Dynamics' score of 1.05 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Douglas Dynamics	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Twin Disc	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Douglas Dynamics presently has a consensus price target of $54.67, indicating a potential upside of 0.81%. Given Douglas Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Douglas Dynamics is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Douglas Dynamics	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.50
Twin Disc	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Douglas Dynamics pays an annual dividend of $1.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Douglas Dynamics pays out 53.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 8.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Twin Disc has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Douglas Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Douglas Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Douglas Dynamics	$656.05M	1.91	$46.90M	$2.22	24.43
Twin Disc	$340.74M	1.00	-$1.89M	$1.84	12.79

Douglas Dynamics has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Twin Disc's net margin of 7.32%. Douglas Dynamics' return on equity of 19.72% beat Twin Disc's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Douglas Dynamics	7.83%	19.72%	8.34%
Twin Disc	7.32%	2.77%	1.29%

Summary

Douglas Dynamics beats Twin Disc on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Miller Industries?

Miller Industries (NYSE:MLR) and Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) are both small-cap construction & farm machinery & heavy trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk and media sentiment.

Miller Industries presently has a consensus target price of $50.00, indicating a potential downside of 4.87%. Given Miller Industries' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Miller Industries is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Miller Industries	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Twin Disc	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Miller Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Miller Industries pays out 62.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 8.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Miller Industries has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Miller Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

79.2% of Miller Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of Twin Disc shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Miller Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Twin Disc has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Miller Industries' net margin of 2.08%. Miller Industries' return on equity of 3.70% beat Twin Disc's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Miller Industries	2.08%	3.70%	2.58%
Twin Disc	7.32%	2.77%	1.29%

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 1 more articles in the media than Miller Industries. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Twin Disc and 3 mentions for Miller Industries. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Miller Industries' score of 0.31 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Miller Industries	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Twin Disc	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Miller Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Miller Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Miller Industries	$790.27M	0.76	$23.01M	$1.34	39.23
Twin Disc	$340.74M	1.00	-$1.89M	$1.84	12.79

Miller Industries has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Twin Disc has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Miller Industries beats Twin Disc on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Wabash National?

Wabash National (NYSE:WNC) and Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) are both small-cap construction & farm machinery & heavy trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Wabash National currently has a consensus price target of $14.50, indicating a potential upside of 4.94%. Given Wabash National's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Wabash National is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Wabash National	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Twin Disc	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 3 more articles in the media than Wabash National. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Twin Disc and 1 mentions for Wabash National. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Wabash National's score of 1.14 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Wabash National	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Twin Disc	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Twin Disc has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Wabash National's net margin of -4.41%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 2.77% beat Wabash National's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Wabash National	-4.41%	-30.16%	-8.79%
Twin Disc	7.32%	2.77%	1.29%

Wabash National pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Wabash National pays out -20.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 8.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Wabash National is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Wabash National has a beta of 1.55, indicating that its stock price is 55% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Twin Disc has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

97.1% of Wabash National shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of Twin Disc shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Wabash National shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Wabash National has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Wabash National is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Twin Disc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Wabash National	$1.54B	0.36	$211.45M	-$1.60	N/A
Twin Disc	$340.74M	1.00	-$1.89M	$1.84	12.79

Summary

Twin Disc beats Wabash National on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Titan International?

Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) and Titan International (NYSE:TWI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

Titan International has a consensus price target of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 66.54%. Given Titan International's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Titan International is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Twin Disc	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Titan International	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Twin Disc has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Titan International. Titan International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Twin Disc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Twin Disc	$340.74M	1.00	-$1.89M	$1.84	12.79
Titan International	$1.83B	0.27	-$63.49M	-$1.37	N/A

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Titan International has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 4 more articles in the media than Titan International. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Twin Disc and 0 mentions for Titan International. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Titan International's score of -0.30 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Twin Disc	Positive
Titan International	Neutral

65.3% of Twin Disc shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Titan International shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Titan International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Twin Disc has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Titan International's net margin of -4.72%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 2.77% beat Titan International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Twin Disc	7.32%	2.77%	1.29%
Titan International	-4.72%	-3.00%	-0.95%

Summary

Twin Disc beats Titan International on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Twin Disc News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TWIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TWIN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Twin Disc	MACH Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$348.89M	$15.89B	$9.55B	$12.20B
Dividend Yield	0.66%	1.27%	3.54%	6.22%
P/E Ratio	12.79	41.97	25.65	24.36
Price / Sales	1.00	6.15	4,816.57	103.01
Price / Cash	26.32	39.00	27.38	36.93
Price / Book	2.03	5.04	4.61	6.49
Net Income	-$1.89M	$445.35M	$791.01M	$336.61M
7 Day Performance	5.66%	-1.70%	-0.71%	0.90%
1 Month Performance	41.13%	3.84%	-1.25%	-0.36%
1 Year Performance	154.76%	32.17%	21.18%	31.26%

Twin Disc Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TWIN Twin Disc	1.9412 of 5 stars	$23.54 -2.7%	N/A	+161.8%	$348.89M	$340.74M	12.79	760	News Coverage Positive News
LNN Lindsay	2.6941 of 5 stars	$116.91 +0.2%	$113.00 -3.3%	-12.4%	$1.21B	$676.37M	21.41	1,275	News Coverage Upcoming Earnings
PLOW Douglas Dynamics	4.2942 of 5 stars	$49.46 -0.8%	$54.67 +10.5%	+85.2%	$1.15B	$656.05M	22.28	1,764	Positive News High Trading Volume
MLR Miller Industries	2.4541 of 5 stars	$49.78 +0.1%	$50.00 +0.4%	+18.4%	$566.71M	$790.27M	37.15	1,535
WNC Wabash National	1.6088 of 5 stars	$12.64 +4.8%	$14.50 +14.7%	+29.8%	$490.53M	$1.54B	N/A	4,700	Positive News Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:TWIN) was last updated on 6/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Twin Disc (TWIN) Competitors

TWIN vs. LNN, PLOW, MLR, WNC, and TWI

How does Twin Disc compare to Lindsay?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Douglas Dynamics?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Miller Industries?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Wabash National?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Titan International?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TWIN vs. The Competition

Twin Disc Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Twin Disc (TWIN) Competitors

TWIN vs. LNN, PLOW, MLR, WNC, and TWI

How does Twin Disc compare to Lindsay?

Which has more risk & volatility, LNN or TWIN?

Is LNN or TWIN a better dividend stock?

Is LNN or TWIN more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, LNN or TWIN?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in LNN or TWIN?

Do analysts rate LNN or TWIN?

Does the media prefer LNN or TWIN?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Douglas Dynamics?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of PLOW or TWIN?

Does the media prefer PLOW or TWIN?

Do analysts recommend PLOW or TWIN?

Is PLOW or TWIN a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, PLOW or TWIN?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, PLOW or TWIN?

Is PLOW or TWIN more profitable?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Miller Industries?

Do analysts rate MLR or TWIN?

Is MLR or TWIN a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in MLR or TWIN?

Is MLR or TWIN more profitable?

Does the media favor MLR or TWIN?

Which has better valuation and earnings, MLR or TWIN?

Which has more volatility and risk, MLR or TWIN?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Wabash National?

Do analysts rate WNC or TWIN?

Does the media favor WNC or TWIN?

Is WNC or TWIN more profitable?

Is WNC or TWIN a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, WNC or TWIN?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in WNC or TWIN?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, WNC or TWIN?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Titan International?

Do analysts rate TWIN or TWI?

Which has better valuation and earnings, TWIN or TWI?

Which has more risk and volatility, TWIN or TWI?

Does the media favor TWIN or TWI?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of TWIN or TWI?

Is TWIN or TWI more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TWIN vs. The Competition

Twin Disc Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools