Go Pro

Twin Disc (TWIN) Competitors

Twin Disc logo
$22.11 -0.48 (-2.12%)
Closing price 07/20/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$21.54 -0.56 (-2.56%)
As of 07/20/2026 07:58 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

TWIN vs. LNN, PLOW, MLR, WNC, and TWI

Should you buy Twin Disc stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Twin Disc with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Twin Disc include Lindsay (LNN), Douglas Dynamics (PLOW), Miller Industries (MLR), Wabash National (WNC), and Titan International (TWI). These companies are all part of the "construction & farm machinery & heavy trucks" industry.

How does Twin Disc compare to Lindsay?

Lindsay (NYSE:LNN) and Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and earnings.

89.9% of Lindsay shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of Twin Disc shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Lindsay shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lindsay currently has a consensus price target of $113.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Twin Disc has a consensus price target of $30.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.69%. Given Twin Disc's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Twin Disc is more favorable than Lindsay.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lindsay
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Twin Disc
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Lindsay has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Twin Disc has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Lindsay had 4 more articles in the media than Twin Disc. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Lindsay and 0 mentions for Twin Disc. Lindsay's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Twin Disc's score of 0.00 indicating that Lindsay is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lindsay Neutral
Twin Disc Neutral

Lindsay pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Lindsay pays out 28.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 8.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lindsay has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years. Lindsay is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Lindsay has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lindsay, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lindsay$676.37M1.70$74.05M$5.2121.69
Twin Disc$340.74M0.94-$1.89M$1.8412.02

Lindsay has a net margin of 8.79% compared to Twin Disc's net margin of 7.32%. Lindsay's return on equity of 10.73% beat Twin Disc's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lindsay8.79% 10.73% 6.63%
Twin Disc 7.32%2.77%1.29%

Summary

Lindsay beats Twin Disc on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Douglas Dynamics?

Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) and Douglas Dynamics (NYSE:PLOW) are both small-cap construction & farm machinery & heavy trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Twin Disc currently has a consensus target price of $30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.69%. Douglas Dynamics has a consensus target price of $54.67, suggesting a potential upside of 18.17%. Given Twin Disc's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Twin Disc is more favorable than Douglas Dynamics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Twin Disc
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Douglas Dynamics
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Douglas Dynamics had 5 more articles in the media than Twin Disc. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Douglas Dynamics and 0 mentions for Twin Disc. Douglas Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Twin Disc's score of 0.00 indicating that Douglas Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Twin Disc Neutral
Douglas Dynamics Very Positive

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.64, meaning that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Douglas Dynamics has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Twin Disc's net margin of 7.32%. Douglas Dynamics' return on equity of 19.72% beat Twin Disc's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Twin Disc7.32% 2.77% 1.29%
Douglas Dynamics 7.83%19.72%8.34%

65.3% of Twin Disc shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.9% of Douglas Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Douglas Dynamics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Douglas Dynamics pays an annual dividend of $1.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Twin Disc pays out 8.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Douglas Dynamics pays out 53.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Douglas Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Douglas Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Twin Disc$340.74M0.94-$1.89M$1.8412.02
Douglas Dynamics$656.05M1.63$46.90M$2.2220.84

Summary

Douglas Dynamics beats Twin Disc on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Miller Industries?

Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) and Miller Industries (NYSE:MLR) are both small-cap construction & farm machinery & heavy trucks companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Miller Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Twin Disc pays out 8.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Miller Industries pays out 62.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Miller Industries has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Miller Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Miller Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Miller Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Twin Disc$340.74M0.94-$1.89M$1.8412.02
Miller Industries$790.27M0.72$23.01M$1.3436.99

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Miller Industries has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

Twin Disc has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Miller Industries' net margin of 2.08%. Miller Industries' return on equity of 3.70% beat Twin Disc's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Twin Disc7.32% 2.77% 1.29%
Miller Industries 2.08%3.70%2.58%

In the previous week, Miller Industries had 3 more articles in the media than Twin Disc. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Miller Industries and 0 mentions for Twin Disc. Miller Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Twin Disc's score of 0.00 indicating that Miller Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Twin Disc Neutral
Miller Industries Positive

65.3% of Twin Disc shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.2% of Miller Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Miller Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Twin Disc currently has a consensus price target of $30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.69%. Miller Industries has a consensus price target of $50.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.87%. Given Twin Disc's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Twin Disc is more favorable than Miller Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Twin Disc
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Miller Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Miller Industries beats Twin Disc on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Wabash National?

Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) and Wabash National (NYSE:WNC) are both small-cap construction & farm machinery & heavy trucks companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wabash National has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Twin Disc currently has a consensus price target of $30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.69%. Wabash National has a consensus price target of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.51%. Given Twin Disc's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Twin Disc is more favorable than Wabash National.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Twin Disc
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Wabash National
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Wabash National pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Twin Disc pays out 8.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Wabash National pays out -20.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Wabash National is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Twin Disc has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Wabash National's net margin of -4.41%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 2.77% beat Wabash National's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Twin Disc7.32% 2.77% 1.29%
Wabash National -4.41%-30.16%-8.79%

65.3% of Twin Disc shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.1% of Wabash National shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Wabash National shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Wabash National had 12 more articles in the media than Twin Disc. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Wabash National and 0 mentions for Twin Disc. Wabash National's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Twin Disc's score of 0.00 indicating that Wabash National is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Twin Disc Neutral
Wabash National Neutral

Wabash National has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Wabash National is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Twin Disc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Twin Disc$340.74M0.94-$1.89M$1.8412.02
Wabash National$1.54B0.35$211.45M-$1.60N/A

Summary

Twin Disc beats Wabash National on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Titan International?

Titan International (NYSE:TWI) and Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Titan International has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Twin Disc has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

Twin Disc has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Titan International's net margin of -4.72%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 2.77% beat Titan International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Titan International-4.72% -3.00% -0.95%
Twin Disc 7.32%2.77%1.29%

80.4% of Titan International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of Twin Disc shares are held by institutional investors. 6.1% of Titan International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Titan International had 2 more articles in the media than Twin Disc. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Titan International and 0 mentions for Twin Disc. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Titan International's score of -0.49 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Titan International Neutral
Twin Disc Neutral

Twin Disc has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Titan International. Titan International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Twin Disc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Titan International$1.83B0.27-$63.49M-$1.37N/A
Twin Disc$340.74M0.94-$1.89M$1.8412.02

Titan International currently has a consensus price target of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 72.25%. Twin Disc has a consensus price target of $30.00, indicating a potential upside of 35.69%. Given Titan International's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Titan International is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Titan International
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Twin Disc
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Summary

Twin Disc beats Titan International on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Twin Disc News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TWIN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TWIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TWIN vs. The Competition

MetricTwin DiscMACH IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$325.81M$15.36B$9.36B$12.28B
Dividend Yield0.71%1.33%3.51%9.39%
P/E Ratio12.0225.8626.7923.94
Price / Sales0.944.481,975.3990.30
Price / Cash24.5839.2627.2647.25
Price / Book1.904.684.406.14
Net Income-$1.89M$463.77M$792.80M$331.74M
7 Day Performance-2.86%-1.06%-0.07%-1.81%
1 Month Performance1.14%-5.43%0.52%-1.44%
1 Year Performance160.12%24.26%14.19%16.33%

Twin Disc Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TWIN
Twin Disc
3.0846 of 5 stars
$22.11
-2.1%
$30.00
+35.7%
+157.4%$325.81M$340.74M12.02760
LNN
Lindsay
2.8871 of 5 stars
$115.74
+0.7%
$113.00
-2.4%
-17.5%$1.17B$676.37M22.221,275
PLOW
Douglas Dynamics
4.3853 of 5 stars
$43.43
+0.8%
$54.67
+25.9%
+60.9%$996.23M$656.05M19.561,764
MLR
Miller Industries
3.4706 of 5 stars
$48.92
+0.3%
$50.00
+2.2%
+16.8%$556.11M$790.27M36.511,535
WNC
Wabash National
3.4007 of 5 stars
$13.47
+3.4%
$14.50
+7.7%
+36.9%$529.98M$1.54BN/A4,700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:TWIN) was last updated on 7/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners