Free Trial

Twin Disc (TWIN) Competitors

Twin Disc logo
$26.26 +0.24 (+0.92%)
Closing price 10/9/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$26.56 +0.30 (+1.16%)
As of 10/9/2026 05:14 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

TWIN vs. GBX, CYD, ASTE, PLOW, and AEBI

Should you buy Twin Disc stock or one of its competitors? Twin Disc's main competitors and comparable companies include Greenbrier Companies (GBX), China Yuchai International (CYD), Astec Industries (ASTE), Douglas Dynamics (PLOW), and Aebi Schmidt (AEBI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "construction machinery & heavy transportation equipment" industry.

How does Twin Disc compare to Greenbrier Companies?

Greenbrier Companies (NYSE:GBX) and Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and dividends.

95.6% of Greenbrier Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of Twin Disc shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Greenbrier Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.1% of Twin Disc shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Greenbrier Companies currently has a consensus price target of $45.00, indicating a potential upside of 16.87%. Twin Disc has a consensus price target of $30.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.24%. Given Greenbrier Companies' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Greenbrier Companies is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Greenbrier Companies
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Twin Disc
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Twin Disc has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Greenbrier Companies' net margin of 4.07%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 6.78% beat Greenbrier Companies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Greenbrier Companies4.07% 6.49% 2.55%
Twin Disc 9.06%6.78%3.31%

Greenbrier Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greenbrier Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Greenbrier Companies$3.24B0.37$204.10M$3.3711.43
Twin Disc$381.27M1.00$27.08M$2.3811.03

Greenbrier Companies pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Greenbrier Companies pays out 40.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Greenbrier Companies has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Greenbrier Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Greenbrier Companies had 3 more articles in the media than Twin Disc. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Greenbrier Companies and 3 mentions for Twin Disc. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Greenbrier Companies' score of -0.05 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Greenbrier Companies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Twin Disc
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Greenbrier Companies has a beta of 1.45, meaning that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Twin Disc has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Greenbrier Companies beats Twin Disc on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to China Yuchai International?

Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) and China Yuchai International (NYSE:CYD) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings and profitability.

Twin Disc presently has a consensus price target of $30.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.24%. China Yuchai International has a consensus price target of $60.00, indicating a potential upside of 101.50%. Given China Yuchai International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe China Yuchai International is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Twin Disc
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
China Yuchai International
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Twin Disc has a net margin of 9.06% compared to China Yuchai International's net margin of 0.00%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 6.78% beat China Yuchai International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Twin Disc9.06% 6.78% 3.31%
China Yuchai International N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, China Yuchai International had 1 more articles in the media than Twin Disc. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for China Yuchai International and 3 mentions for Twin Disc. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat China Yuchai International's score of 0.21 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Twin Disc
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
China Yuchai International
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

65.3% of Twin Disc shares are held by institutional investors. 21.1% of Twin Disc shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. China Yuchai International pays an annual dividend of $0.87 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Twin Disc pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. China Yuchai International has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. China Yuchai International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

China Yuchai International has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Twin Disc$381.27M1.00$27.08M$2.3811.03
China Yuchai International$3.51B0.32$77.63MN/AN/A

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Yuchai International has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

China Yuchai International beats Twin Disc on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Astec Industries?

Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) and Astec Industries (NASDAQ:ASTE) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

65.3% of Twin Disc shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Astec Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.1% of Twin Disc shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Astec Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Astec Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Astec Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Twin Disc$381.27M1.00$27.08M$2.3811.03
Astec Industries$1.41B0.63$38.80M$0.8545.54

Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Astec Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Twin Disc pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Astec Industries pays out 61.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Astec Industries has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Twin Disc presently has a consensus target price of $30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.24%. Given Twin Disc's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Twin Disc is more favorable than Astec Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Twin Disc
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Astec Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Twin Disc has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Astec Industries' net margin of 1.26%. Astec Industries' return on equity of 10.26% beat Twin Disc's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Twin Disc9.06% 6.78% 3.31%
Astec Industries 1.26%10.26%5.01%

In the previous week, Astec Industries had 4 more articles in the media than Twin Disc. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Astec Industries and 3 mentions for Twin Disc. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Astec Industries' score of 0.25 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Twin Disc
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Astec Industries
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Astec Industries beats Twin Disc on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Douglas Dynamics?

Douglas Dynamics (NYSE:PLOW) and Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Douglas Dynamics currently has a consensus target price of $51.67, indicating a potential upside of 31.82%. Twin Disc has a consensus target price of $30.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.24%. Given Douglas Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Douglas Dynamics is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Douglas Dynamics
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Twin Disc
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Douglas Dynamics pays an annual dividend of $1.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Douglas Dynamics pays out 53.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

91.9% of Douglas Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of Twin Disc shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Douglas Dynamics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 21.1% of Twin Disc shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Twin Disc has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Douglas Dynamics' net margin of 7.52%. Douglas Dynamics' return on equity of 19.03% beat Twin Disc's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Douglas Dynamics7.52% 19.03% 8.07%
Twin Disc 9.06%6.78%3.31%

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 3 more articles in the media than Douglas Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Twin Disc and 0 mentions for Douglas Dynamics. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Douglas Dynamics' score of 0.00 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Douglas Dynamics Neutral
Twin Disc Positive

Douglas Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Douglas Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Douglas Dynamics$656.05M1.38$46.90M$2.2017.82
Twin Disc$381.27M1.00$27.08M$2.3811.03

Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Twin Disc has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Douglas Dynamics beats Twin Disc on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Aebi Schmidt?

Aebi Schmidt (NASDAQ:AEBI) and Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 1 more articles in the media than Aebi Schmidt. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Twin Disc and 2 mentions for Aebi Schmidt. Aebi Schmidt's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Twin Disc's score of 0.84 indicating that Aebi Schmidt is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Aebi Schmidt
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Twin Disc
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Twin Disc has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Aebi Schmidt's net margin of 1.09%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 6.78% beat Aebi Schmidt's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aebi Schmidt1.09% 2.59% 1.04%
Twin Disc 9.06%6.78%3.31%

Aebi Schmidt pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Aebi Schmidt pays out 31.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Aebi Schmidt presently has a consensus target price of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 54.26%. Twin Disc has a consensus target price of $30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.24%. Given Aebi Schmidt's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Aebi Schmidt is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aebi Schmidt
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Twin Disc
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

65.3% of Twin Disc shares are owned by institutional investors. 39.1% of Aebi Schmidt shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 21.1% of Twin Disc shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Aebi Schmidt has a beta of 2.59, indicating that its stock price is 159% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Twin Disc has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Twin Disc has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aebi Schmidt. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aebi Schmidt, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aebi Schmidt$1.53B0.56$9.74M$0.3234.44
Twin Disc$381.27M1.00$27.08M$2.3811.03

Summary

Twin Disc beats Aebi Schmidt on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Twin Disc News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TWIN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TWIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TWIN vs. The Competition

MetricTwin DiscMachinery IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$381.79M$10.85B$10.18B$13.30B
Dividend Yield0.76%2.33%96.65%22.58%
P/E Ratio11.0320.8926.7626.14
Price / Sales1.0056.56275.2087.84
Price / Cash14.1223.0723.9653.71
Price / Book1.724.274.776.33
Net Income$27.08M$377.33M$616.42M$382.15M
7 Day Performance-7.86%-1.09%-1.15%-1.40%
1 Month Performance7.01%-1.90%-2.56%-3.35%
1 Year Performance84.41%5.54%3.62%1.49%

Twin Disc Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TWIN
Twin Disc
3.129 of 5 stars
$26.26
+0.9%
$30.00
+14.2%
+84.4%$381.79M$381.27M11.031,087
GBX
Greenbrier Companies
4.0144 of 5 stars
$41.17
-2.2%
$45.00
+9.3%
-12.3%$1.30B$3.24B12.2211,000
CYD
China Yuchai International
4.9178 of 5 stars
$32.61
+0.5%
$60.00
+84.0%
-15.7%$1.22B$3.51BN/A9,189
ASTE
Astec Industries
2.7864 of 5 stars
$40.69
-1.0%
N/A-12.5%$946.57M$1.41B47.874,468
PLOW
Douglas Dynamics
4.2595 of 5 stars
$39.79
+0.6%
$51.67
+29.8%
+32.0%$912.47M$656.05M18.091,764

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:TWIN) was last updated on 10/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners