Free Trial

Twin Disc (TWIN) Competitors

Twin Disc logo
$19.40 -0.51 (-2.54%)
As of 02:17 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

TWIN vs. MLR, TWI, MTW, WNC, and CVGI

Should you buy Twin Disc stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Twin Disc with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Twin Disc include Miller Industries (MLR), Titan International (TWI), Manitowoc (MTW), Wabash National (WNC), and Commercial Vehicle Group (CVGI). These companies are all part of the "construction & farm machinery & heavy trucks" industry.

How does Twin Disc compare to Miller Industries?

Miller Industries (NYSE:MLR) and Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) are both small-cap construction & farm machinery & heavy trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Twin Disc has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Miller Industries' net margin of 2.08%. Miller Industries' return on equity of 3.70% beat Twin Disc's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Miller Industries2.08% 3.70% 2.58%
Twin Disc 7.32%2.77%1.29%

Miller Industries presently has a consensus price target of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.00%. Given Miller Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Miller Industries is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Miller Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Twin Disc
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Miller Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Miller Industries pays out 62.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 8.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Miller Industries has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Miller Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

79.2% of Miller Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of Twin Disc shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Miller Industries shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Miller Industries and Miller Industries both had 4 articles in the media. Miller Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat Twin Disc's score of 0.17 indicating that Miller Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Miller Industries
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Twin Disc
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Miller Industries has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Twin Disc has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Miller Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Miller Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Miller Industries$790.27M0.70$23.01M$1.3436.23
Twin Disc$340.74M0.82-$1.89M$1.8410.58

Summary

Miller Industries beats Twin Disc on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Titan International?

Titan International (NYSE:TWI) and Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Titan International pays an annual dividend of $0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Titan International pays out -1.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 8.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Titan International has a beta of 1.45, meaning that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Twin Disc has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Titan International currently has a consensus target price of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 73.94%. Given Titan International's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Titan International is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Titan International
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Twin Disc
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Titan International and Titan International both had 4 articles in the media. Titan International's average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Twin Disc's score of 0.17 indicating that Titan International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Titan International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Twin Disc
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Twin Disc has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Titan International. Titan International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Twin Disc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Titan International$1.84B0.26-$63.49M-$1.37N/A
Twin Disc$340.74M0.82-$1.89M$1.8410.58

80.4% of Titan International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of Twin Disc shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.1% of Titan International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Twin Disc has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Titan International's net margin of -4.72%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 2.77% beat Titan International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Titan International-4.72% -3.00% -0.95%
Twin Disc 7.32%2.77%1.29%

Summary

Twin Disc beats Titan International on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Manitowoc?

Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) and Manitowoc (NYSE:MTW) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

65.3% of Twin Disc shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.7% of Manitowoc shares are held by institutional investors. 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Manitowoc shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 4 more articles in the media than Manitowoc. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Twin Disc and 0 mentions for Manitowoc. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat Manitowoc's score of 0.00 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Twin Disc Neutral
Manitowoc Neutral

Manitowoc has a consensus price target of $10.33, suggesting a potential downside of 13.67%. Given Manitowoc's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Manitowoc is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Twin Disc
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Manitowoc
3 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.25

Twin Disc has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Manitowoc's net margin of 0.33%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 2.77% beat Manitowoc's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Twin Disc7.32% 2.77% 1.29%
Manitowoc 0.33%1.85%0.68%

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Manitowoc has a beta of 1.75, indicating that its share price is 75% more volatile than the broader market.

Manitowoc has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Manitowoc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Twin Disc$340.74M0.82-$1.89M$1.8410.58
Manitowoc$2.24B0.19$7.20M$0.2059.85

Summary

Twin Disc beats Manitowoc on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Wabash National?

Wabash National (NYSE:WNC) and Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) are both small-cap construction & farm machinery & heavy trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Twin Disc has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Wabash National's net margin of -4.41%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 2.77% beat Wabash National's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wabash National-4.41% -30.16% -8.79%
Twin Disc 7.32%2.77%1.29%

Wabash National presently has a consensus target price of $8.75, indicating a potential upside of 11.46%. Given Wabash National's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Wabash National is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Wabash National
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Twin Disc
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Wabash National pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Wabash National pays out -20.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 8.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Wabash National is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Wabash National has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Wabash National is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Twin Disc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wabash National$1.54B0.21$211.45M-$1.60N/A
Twin Disc$340.74M0.82-$1.89M$1.8410.58

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 4 more articles in the media than Wabash National. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Twin Disc and 0 mentions for Wabash National. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 0.17 beat Wabash National's score of 0.00 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wabash National Neutral
Twin Disc Neutral

97.1% of Wabash National shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of Twin Disc shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Wabash National shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Wabash National has a beta of 1.55, meaning that its stock price is 55% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Twin Disc has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Twin Disc beats Wabash National on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Commercial Vehicle Group?

Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) and Commercial Vehicle Group (NASDAQ:CVGI) are both small-cap construction & farm machinery & heavy trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Twin Disc has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Commercial Vehicle Group's net margin of -2.70%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 2.77% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Twin Disc7.32% 2.77% 1.29%
Commercial Vehicle Group -2.70%-12.47%-4.15%

Twin Disc has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Commercial Vehicle Group. Commercial Vehicle Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Twin Disc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Twin Disc$340.74M0.82-$1.89M$1.8410.58
Commercial Vehicle Group$650.70M0.28-$22.78M-$0.52N/A

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 2 more articles in the media than Commercial Vehicle Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Twin Disc and 2 mentions for Commercial Vehicle Group. Commercial Vehicle Group's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Twin Disc's score of 0.17 indicating that Commercial Vehicle Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Twin Disc
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Commercial Vehicle Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

65.3% of Twin Disc shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.3% of Commercial Vehicle Group shares are held by institutional investors. 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.6% of Commercial Vehicle Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Commercial Vehicle Group has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.31%. Given Commercial Vehicle Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Twin Disc
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Commercial Vehicle Group
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Summary

Twin Disc beats Commercial Vehicle Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Twin Disc News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TWIN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TWIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TWIN vs. The Competition

MetricTwin DiscMACH IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$282.49M$15.13B$9.43B$12.11B
Dividend Yield0.80%1.30%3.54%5.56%
P/E Ratio10.6540.6725.0923.78
Price / Sales0.826.404,976.6686.80
Price / Cash21.6635.5627.3737.25
Price / Book1.684.884.806.74
Net Income-$1.89M$445.83M$793.53M$337.72M
7 Day Performance15.24%0.16%1.98%-2.91%
1 Month Performance1.22%-3.27%2,657.74%1.65%
1 Year Performance163.03%31.56%30.02%26.91%

Twin Disc Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TWIN
Twin Disc
1.8998 of 5 stars
$19.46
-2.2%
N/A+169.1%$282.49M$340.74M10.65760
MLR
Miller Industries
3.5951 of 5 stars
$48.62
+3.2%
$50.00
+2.8%
+4.7%$536.97M$790.27M36.291,535
TWI
Titan International
3.152 of 5 stars
$7.73
+5.8%
$12.00
+55.3%
-10.6%$469.92M$1.83BN/A8,200
MTW
Manitowoc
1.0645 of 5 stars
$12.24
+5.5%
$10.33
-15.6%
+7.7%$416.55M$2.24B61.204,700
WNC
Wabash National
1.7944 of 5 stars
$7.78
+1.8%
$8.75
+12.5%
-21.7%$310.75M$1.54BN/A4,700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:TWIN) was last updated on 6/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners