Twin Disc (TWIN) Competitors

$17.08 -0.39 (-2.23%)

Closing price 05/18/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$17.06 -0.02 (-0.15%)

As of 05/18/2026 04:10 PM Eastern

TWIN vs. PLOW, MLR, TWI, MTW, and WNC

Should you buy Twin Disc stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Twin Disc with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Twin Disc include Douglas Dynamics (PLOW), Miller Industries (MLR), Titan International (TWI), Manitowoc (MTW), and Wabash National (WNC). These companies are all part of the "construction & farm machinery & heavy trucks" industry.

How does Twin Disc compare to Douglas Dynamics?

Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) and Douglas Dynamics (NYSE:PLOW) are both small-cap construction & farm machinery & heavy trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, risk and valuation.

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Douglas Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Douglas Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Twin Disc	$340.74M	0.72	-$1.89M	$1.84	9.28
Douglas Dynamics	$656.05M	1.56	$46.90M	$2.22	19.90

Douglas Dynamics has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Twin Disc's net margin of 7.32%. Douglas Dynamics' return on equity of 19.72% beat Twin Disc's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Twin Disc	7.32%	2.77%	1.29%
Douglas Dynamics	7.83%	19.72%	8.34%

Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Douglas Dynamics pays an annual dividend of $1.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Twin Disc pays out 8.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Douglas Dynamics pays out 53.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Douglas Dynamics has a consensus price target of $54.67, indicating a potential upside of 23.76%. Given Douglas Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Douglas Dynamics is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Twin Disc	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Douglas Dynamics	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

In the previous week, Douglas Dynamics had 6 more articles in the media than Twin Disc. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Douglas Dynamics and 0 mentions for Twin Disc. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Douglas Dynamics' score of 1.22 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Twin Disc	Very Positive
Douglas Dynamics	Positive

65.3% of Twin Disc shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.9% of Douglas Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Douglas Dynamics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Douglas Dynamics beats Twin Disc on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Miller Industries?

Miller Industries (NYSE:MLR) and Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) are both small-cap construction & farm machinery & heavy trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Miller Industries has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Twin Disc has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Miller Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Miller Industries pays out 62.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 8.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Miller Industries has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Miller Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Miller Industries currently has a consensus target price of $50.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.45%. Given Miller Industries' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Miller Industries is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Miller Industries	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Twin Disc	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Twin Disc has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Miller Industries' net margin of 2.08%. Miller Industries' return on equity of 3.70% beat Twin Disc's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Miller Industries	2.08%	3.70%	2.58%
Twin Disc	7.32%	2.77%	1.29%

79.2% of Miller Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of Twin Disc shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Miller Industries shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Miller Industries had 2 more articles in the media than Twin Disc. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Miller Industries and 0 mentions for Twin Disc. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Miller Industries' score of 0.39 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Miller Industries	Neutral
Twin Disc	Very Positive

Miller Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Miller Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Miller Industries	$790.27M	0.68	$23.01M	$1.34	35.05
Twin Disc	$340.74M	0.72	-$1.89M	$1.84	9.28

Summary

Miller Industries beats Twin Disc on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Titan International?

Titan International (NYSE:TWI) and Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Titan International's score of 0.00 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Titan International	Neutral
Twin Disc	Very Positive

Titan International has a beta of 1.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Twin Disc has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Twin Disc has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Titan International. Titan International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Twin Disc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Titan International	$1.83B	0.26	-$63.49M	-$1.37	N/A
Twin Disc	$340.74M	0.72	-$1.89M	$1.84	9.28

80.4% of Titan International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of Twin Disc shares are held by institutional investors. 6.1% of Titan International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Titan International currently has a consensus target price of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 61.62%. Given Titan International's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Titan International is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Titan International	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Twin Disc	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Twin Disc has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Titan International's net margin of -4.72%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 2.77% beat Titan International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Titan International	-4.72%	-3.00%	-0.95%
Twin Disc	7.32%	2.77%	1.29%

Summary

Twin Disc beats Titan International on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Manitowoc?

Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) and Manitowoc (NYSE:MTW) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Manitowoc has a beta of 1.81, indicating that its share price is 81% more volatile than the broader market.

Twin Disc has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Manitowoc's net margin of 0.33%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 2.77% beat Manitowoc's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Twin Disc	7.32%	2.77%	1.29%
Manitowoc	0.33%	1.85%	0.68%

In the previous week, Manitowoc had 2 more articles in the media than Twin Disc. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Manitowoc and 0 mentions for Twin Disc. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Manitowoc's score of 1.11 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Twin Disc	Very Positive
Manitowoc	Positive

Manitowoc has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Manitowoc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Twin Disc	$340.74M	0.72	-$1.89M	$1.84	9.28
Manitowoc	$2.24B	0.19	$7.20M	$0.20	59.35

Manitowoc has a consensus price target of $10.33, indicating a potential downside of 12.95%. Given Manitowoc's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Manitowoc is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Twin Disc	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Manitowoc	3 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.25

65.3% of Twin Disc shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.7% of Manitowoc shares are held by institutional investors. 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Manitowoc shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Twin Disc beats Manitowoc on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Wabash National?

Wabash National (NYSE:WNC) and Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) are both small-cap construction & farm machinery & heavy trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

97.1% of Wabash National shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of Twin Disc shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Wabash National shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Wabash National pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Wabash National pays out -20.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 8.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Wabash National is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Wabash National has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Wabash National is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Twin Disc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Wabash National	$1.47B	0.19	$211.45M	-$1.60	N/A
Twin Disc	$340.74M	0.72	-$1.89M	$1.84	9.28

Wabash National currently has a consensus target price of $8.75, indicating a potential upside of 28.39%. Given Wabash National's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Wabash National is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Wabash National	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
Twin Disc	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

In the previous week, Wabash National had 5 more articles in the media than Twin Disc. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Wabash National and 0 mentions for Twin Disc. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Wabash National's score of 0.22 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Wabash National	Neutral
Twin Disc	Very Positive

Twin Disc has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Wabash National's net margin of -4.41%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 2.77% beat Wabash National's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Wabash National	-4.41%	-30.16%	-8.79%
Twin Disc	7.32%	2.77%	1.29%

Wabash National has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Twin Disc has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Twin Disc beats Wabash National on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Twin Disc News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TWIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TWIN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Twin Disc	MACH Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$251.97M	$15.40B	$9.28B	$12.29B
Dividend Yield	0.92%	1.35%	3.59%	5.30%
P/E Ratio	9.28	43.35	25.07	25.23
Price / Sales	0.72	6.61	4,451.16	74.46
Price / Cash	19.00	36.59	27.40	37.30
Price / Book	1.47	5.00	4.80	6.63
Net Income	-$1.89M	$444.52M	$794.33M	$335.59M
7 Day Performance	-8.12%	-3.14%	-0.94%	-1.20%
1 Month Performance	-3.17%	0.90%	0.65%	-1.16%
1 Year Performance	139.89%	32.03%	33.72%	28.10%

Twin Disc Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TWIN Twin Disc	1.8329 of 5 stars	$17.08 -2.2%	N/A	+129.6%	$251.97M	$340.74M	9.28	760	Positive News
PLOW Douglas Dynamics	4.9565 of 5 stars	$44.95 -1.8%	$54.67 +21.6%	+52.9%	$1.06B	$656.05M	20.25	1,764	Analyst Upgrade
MLR Miller Industries	3.4677 of 5 stars	$46.82 -2.5%	$50.00 +6.8%	+1.3%	$547.22M	$790.27M	34.94	1,535
TWI Titan International	3.0739 of 5 stars	$7.59 -1.1%	$12.00 +58.2%	-1.3%	$493.73M	$1.83B	N/A	8,200
MTW Manitowoc	0.9033 of 5 stars	$12.85 -1.3%	$10.50 -18.3%	+0.9%	$467.54M	$2.24B	64.23	4,700

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:TWIN) was last updated on 5/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Twin Disc (TWIN) Competitors

TWIN vs. PLOW, MLR, TWI, MTW, and WNC

How does Twin Disc compare to Douglas Dynamics?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Miller Industries?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Titan International?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Manitowoc?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Wabash National?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TWIN vs. The Competition

Twin Disc Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Twin Disc (TWIN) Competitors

TWIN vs. PLOW, MLR, TWI, MTW, and WNC

How does Twin Disc compare to Douglas Dynamics?

Which has more volatility & risk, TWIN or PLOW?

Which has better valuation & earnings, TWIN or PLOW?

Is TWIN or PLOW more profitable?

Is TWIN or PLOW a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer TWIN or PLOW?

Does the media favor TWIN or PLOW?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of TWIN or PLOW?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Miller Industries?

Which has more risk and volatility, MLR or TWIN?

Is MLR or TWIN a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate MLR or TWIN?

Is MLR or TWIN more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MLR or TWIN?

Does the media favor MLR or TWIN?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, MLR or TWIN?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Titan International?

Does the media refer more to TWI or TWIN?

Which has more volatility and risk, TWI or TWIN?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, TWI or TWIN?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in TWI or TWIN?

Do analysts prefer TWI or TWIN?

Is TWI or TWIN more profitable?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Manitowoc?

Which has more volatility & risk, TWIN or MTW?

Is TWIN or MTW more profitable?

Does the media favor TWIN or MTW?

Which has better earnings and valuation, TWIN or MTW?

Do analysts prefer TWIN or MTW?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in TWIN or MTW?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Wabash National?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in WNC or TWIN?

Is WNC or TWIN a better dividend stock?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, WNC or TWIN?

Do analysts recommend WNC or TWIN?

Does the media favor WNC or TWIN?

Is WNC or TWIN more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, WNC or TWIN?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TWIN vs. The Competition

Twin Disc Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools