Do analysts recommend ASTE or TWIN?

Twin Disc has a consensus price target of $30.00, indicating a potential upside of 30.04%. Given Twin Disc's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Twin Disc is more favorable than Astec Industries. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Astec Industries 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 2 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75 Twin Disc 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, ASTE or TWIN?

Astec Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Astec Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Astec Industries $1.56B 0.63 $38.80M $0.85 50.32 Twin Disc $381.27M 0.87 $27.08M $2.38 9.69

Does the media refer more to ASTE or TWIN?

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 2 more articles in the media than Astec Industries. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Twin Disc and 5 mentions for Astec Industries. Astec Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Twin Disc's score of 1.42 indicating that Astec Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Astec Industries 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Twin Disc 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PLOW or TWIN?

Douglas Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Douglas Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Douglas Dynamics $699.10M 1.36 $46.90M $2.20 18.73 Twin Disc $381.27M 0.87 $27.08M $2.38 9.69

Does the media refer more to PLOW or TWIN?

In the previous week, Douglas Dynamics and Douglas Dynamics both had 7 articles in the media. Douglas Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat Twin Disc's score of 1.42 indicating that Douglas Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Douglas Dynamics 7 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Twin Disc 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is TWIN or AEBI more profitable?

Twin Disc has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Aebi Schmidt's net margin of 1.09%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 7.19% beat Aebi Schmidt's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Twin Disc 9.06% 7.19% 3.36% Aebi Schmidt 1.09% 2.59% 1.04%

Does the media favor TWIN or AEBI?

In the previous week, Twin Disc and Twin Disc both had 7 articles in the media. Aebi Schmidt's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Twin Disc's score of 1.42 indicating that Aebi Schmidt is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Twin Disc 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Aebi Schmidt 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Which has better earnings & valuation, MTW or TWIN?

Twin Disc has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Manitowoc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Manitowoc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Manitowoc $2.32B 0.30 $7.20M $0.55 35.29 Twin Disc $381.27M 0.87 $27.08M $2.38 9.69

Is MTW or TWIN more profitable?

Twin Disc has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Manitowoc's net margin of 0.87%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 7.19% beat Manitowoc's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Manitowoc 0.87% 3.86% 1.43% Twin Disc 9.06% 7.19% 3.36%

Does the media refer more to MTW or TWIN?

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 4 more articles in the media than Manitowoc. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Twin Disc and 3 mentions for Manitowoc. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Manitowoc's score of 0.63 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Manitowoc 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Twin Disc 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to MLR or TWIN?

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 1 more articles in the media than Miller Industries. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Twin Disc and 6 mentions for Miller Industries. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Miller Industries' score of 0.27 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Miller Industries 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Twin Disc 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Twin Disc (TWIN) Competitors

$23.07 -0.05 (-0.22%)

As of 03:51 PM Eastern

Compare

TWIN vs. ASTE, PLOW, AEBI, MTW, and MLR

Should you buy Twin Disc stock or one of its competitors? Twin Disc's main competitors and comparable companies include Astec Industries (ASTE), Douglas Dynamics (PLOW), Aebi Schmidt (AEBI), Manitowoc (MTW), and Miller Industries (MLR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "construction machinery & heavy transportation equipment" industry.

How does Twin Disc compare to Astec Industries?

Astec Industries (NASDAQ:ASTE) and Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Astec Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Astec Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Astec Industries	$1.56B	0.63	$38.80M	$0.85	50.32
Twin Disc	$381.27M	0.87	$27.08M	$2.38	9.69

Astec Industries has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Twin Disc has a beta of 0.64, meaning that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

Twin Disc has a consensus price target of $30.00, indicating a potential upside of 30.04%. Given Twin Disc's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Twin Disc is more favorable than Astec Industries.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Astec Industries	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Twin Disc	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Twin Disc has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Astec Industries' net margin of 1.26%. Astec Industries' return on equity of 10.26% beat Twin Disc's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Astec Industries	1.26%	10.26%	5.01%
Twin Disc	9.06%	7.19%	3.36%

93.2% of Astec Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of Twin Disc shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Astec Industries shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 2 more articles in the media than Astec Industries. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Twin Disc and 5 mentions for Astec Industries. Astec Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Twin Disc's score of 1.42 indicating that Astec Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Astec Industries	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Twin Disc	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Astec Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Astec Industries pays out 61.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Astec Industries beats Twin Disc on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Douglas Dynamics?

Douglas Dynamics (NYSE:PLOW) and Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

Douglas Dynamics currently has a consensus target price of $51.67, indicating a potential upside of 25.40%. Twin Disc has a consensus target price of $30.00, indicating a potential upside of 30.04%. Given Twin Disc's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Twin Disc is more favorable than Douglas Dynamics.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Douglas Dynamics	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
Twin Disc	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Twin Disc has a beta of 0.64, meaning that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

91.8% of Douglas Dynamics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of Twin Disc shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Douglas Dynamics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Douglas Dynamics pays an annual dividend of $1.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Douglas Dynamics pays out 53.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Twin Disc has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Douglas Dynamics' net margin of 7.52%. Douglas Dynamics' return on equity of 19.03% beat Twin Disc's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Douglas Dynamics	7.52%	19.03%	8.07%
Twin Disc	9.06%	7.19%	3.36%

Douglas Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Douglas Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Douglas Dynamics	$699.10M	1.36	$46.90M	$2.20	18.73
Twin Disc	$381.27M	0.87	$27.08M	$2.38	9.69

In the previous week, Douglas Dynamics and Douglas Dynamics both had 7 articles in the media. Douglas Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat Twin Disc's score of 1.42 indicating that Douglas Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Douglas Dynamics	7 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Twin Disc	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Douglas Dynamics beats Twin Disc on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Aebi Schmidt?

Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) and Aebi Schmidt (NASDAQ:AEBI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Twin Disc and Twin Disc both had 7 articles in the media. Aebi Schmidt's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Twin Disc's score of 1.42 indicating that Aebi Schmidt is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Twin Disc	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Aebi Schmidt	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Twin Disc has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aebi Schmidt. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aebi Schmidt, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Twin Disc	$381.27M	0.87	$27.08M	$2.38	9.69
Aebi Schmidt	$1.53B	0.64	$9.74M	$0.32	39.38

Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Aebi Schmidt pays an annual dividend of $0.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Twin Disc pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Aebi Schmidt pays out 31.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Twin Disc is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

65.3% of Twin Disc shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 39.1% of Aebi Schmidt shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Twin Disc has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Aebi Schmidt's net margin of 1.09%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 7.19% beat Aebi Schmidt's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Twin Disc	9.06%	7.19%	3.36%
Aebi Schmidt	1.09%	2.59%	1.04%

Twin Disc currently has a consensus price target of $30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 30.04%. Aebi Schmidt has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 34.92%. Given Aebi Schmidt's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Aebi Schmidt is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Twin Disc	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Aebi Schmidt	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Summary

Twin Disc beats Aebi Schmidt on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Manitowoc?

Manitowoc (NYSE:MTW) and Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 4 more articles in the media than Manitowoc. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Twin Disc and 3 mentions for Manitowoc. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Manitowoc's score of 0.63 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Manitowoc	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Twin Disc	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Manitowoc has a beta of 1.72, indicating that its share price is 72% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Twin Disc has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

Twin Disc has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Manitowoc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Manitowoc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Manitowoc	$2.32B	0.30	$7.20M	$0.55	35.29
Twin Disc	$381.27M	0.87	$27.08M	$2.38	9.69

78.7% of Manitowoc shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of Twin Disc shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of Manitowoc shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Manitowoc currently has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential downside of 27.87%. Twin Disc has a consensus target price of $30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 30.04%. Given Twin Disc's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Twin Disc is more favorable than Manitowoc.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Manitowoc	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.33
Twin Disc	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Twin Disc has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Manitowoc's net margin of 0.87%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 7.19% beat Manitowoc's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Manitowoc	0.87%	3.86%	1.43%
Twin Disc	9.06%	7.19%	3.36%

Manitowoc pays an annual dividend of $0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Manitowoc pays out 14.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Twin Disc is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Twin Disc beats Manitowoc on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Miller Industries?

Miller Industries (NYSE:MLR) and Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and valuation.

Miller Industries has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Twin Disc has a beta of 0.64, meaning that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

79.2% of Miller Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of Twin Disc shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Miller Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Miller Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Miller Industries pays out 67.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Miller Industries has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Miller Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Twin Disc has a net margin of 9.06% compared to Miller Industries' net margin of 1.86%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 7.19% beat Miller Industries' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Miller Industries	1.86%	3.41%	2.40%
Twin Disc	9.06%	7.19%	3.36%

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 1 more articles in the media than Miller Industries. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Twin Disc and 6 mentions for Miller Industries. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Miller Industries' score of 0.27 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Miller Industries	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Twin Disc	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Miller Industries currently has a consensus price target of $54.00, indicating a potential downside of 3.91%. Twin Disc has a consensus price target of $30.00, indicating a potential upside of 30.04%. Given Twin Disc's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Twin Disc is more favorable than Miller Industries.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Miller Industries	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Twin Disc	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Twin Disc has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Miller Industries. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Miller Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Miller Industries	$790.27M	0.81	$23.01M	$1.24	45.32
Twin Disc	$381.27M	0.87	$27.08M	$2.38	9.69

Summary

Twin Disc beats Miller Industries on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Twin Disc News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TWIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TWIN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Twin Disc	Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$332.67M	$11.40B	$10.49B	$12.83B
Dividend Yield	0.87%	2.19%	97.24%	11.27%
P/E Ratio	9.69	20.58	26.24	25.51
Price / Sales	0.87	67.90	370.23	122.84
Price / Cash	25.15	23.04	24.21	36.03
Price / Book	1.99	4.37	4.99	6.33
Net Income	$27.08M	$357.78M	$610.96M	$349.45M
7 Day Performance	1.99%	-0.10%	-0.82%	-0.09%
1 Month Performance	1.14%	1.69%	1.56%	4.37%
1 Year Performance	82.52%	10.74%	10.58%	14.79%

Twin Disc Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TWIN Twin Disc	3.6486 of 5 stars	$23.07 -0.2%	$30.00 +30.0%	+82.9%	$332.67M	$381.27M	9.69	760	Positive News
ASTE Astec Industries	2.8313 of 5 stars	$43.80 +0.5%	N/A	-6.3%	$1.00B	$1.41B	51.53	4,468	Positive News
PLOW Douglas Dynamics	4.897 of 5 stars	$41.67 +0.1%	$51.67 +24.0%	+23.7%	$960.93M	$656.05M	18.94	1,764	Positive News
AEBI Aebi Schmidt	4.7095 of 5 stars	$12.36 +1.2%	$17.00 +37.5%	N/A	$947.54M	$1.53B	38.63	5,700	Positive News
MTW Manitowoc	1.8013 of 5 stars	$19.57 -0.6%	$14.00 -28.5%	+97.3%	$709.70M	$2.24B	35.58	4,700

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:TWIN) was last updated on 8/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Twin Disc (TWIN) Competitors

TWIN vs. ASTE, PLOW, AEBI, MTW, and MLR

How does Twin Disc compare to Astec Industries?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Douglas Dynamics?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Aebi Schmidt?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Manitowoc?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Miller Industries?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TWIN vs. The Competition

Twin Disc Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Twin Disc (TWIN) Competitors

TWIN vs. ASTE, PLOW, AEBI, MTW, and MLR

How does Twin Disc compare to Astec Industries?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, ASTE or TWIN?

Which has more risk and volatility, ASTE or TWIN?

Do analysts recommend ASTE or TWIN?

Is ASTE or TWIN more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in ASTE or TWIN?

Does the media refer more to ASTE or TWIN?

Is ASTE or TWIN a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Douglas Dynamics?

Do analysts prefer PLOW or TWIN?

Which has more risk and volatility, PLOW or TWIN?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in PLOW or TWIN?

Is PLOW or TWIN a better dividend stock?

Is PLOW or TWIN more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PLOW or TWIN?

Does the media refer more to PLOW or TWIN?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Aebi Schmidt?

Does the media favor TWIN or AEBI?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, TWIN or AEBI?

Is TWIN or AEBI a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in TWIN or AEBI?

Is TWIN or AEBI more profitable?

Do analysts rate TWIN or AEBI?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Manitowoc?

Does the media refer more to MTW or TWIN?

Which has more risk and volatility, MTW or TWIN?

Which has better earnings & valuation, MTW or TWIN?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in MTW or TWIN?

Do analysts recommend MTW or TWIN?

Is MTW or TWIN more profitable?

Is MTW or TWIN a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Twin Disc compare to Miller Industries?

Which has more risk & volatility, MLR or TWIN?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MLR or TWIN?

Is MLR or TWIN a better dividend stock?

Is MLR or TWIN more profitable?

Does the media refer more to MLR or TWIN?

Do analysts recommend MLR or TWIN?

Which has better valuation & earnings, MLR or TWIN?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TWIN vs. The Competition

Twin Disc Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools