Go Pro

Twin Disc (TWIN) Competitors

Twin Disc logo
$23.54 -0.65 (-2.69%)
Closing price 06/29/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$23.62 +0.09 (+0.36%)
As of 06/29/2026 05:29 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

TWIN vs. LNN, PLOW, MLR, WNC, and TWI

Should you buy Twin Disc stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Twin Disc with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Twin Disc include Lindsay (LNN), Douglas Dynamics (PLOW), Miller Industries (MLR), Wabash National (WNC), and Titan International (TWI). These companies are all part of the "construction & farm machinery & heavy trucks" industry.

How does Twin Disc compare to Lindsay?

Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) and Lindsay (NYSE:LNN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

65.3% of Twin Disc shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.9% of Lindsay shares are held by institutional investors. 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Lindsay shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lindsay has a net margin of 9.25% compared to Twin Disc's net margin of 7.32%. Lindsay's return on equity of 11.28% beat Twin Disc's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Twin Disc7.32% 2.77% 1.29%
Lindsay 9.25%11.28%7.04%

Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Lindsay pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Twin Disc pays out 8.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lindsay pays out 27.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lindsay has raised its dividend for 22 consecutive years. Lindsay is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Lindsay has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lindsay, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Twin Disc$340.74M1.00-$1.89M$1.8412.79
Lindsay$676.37M1.92$74.05M$5.4622.81

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lindsay has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Lindsay has a consensus price target of $113.00, indicating a potential downside of 9.28%. Given Lindsay's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Lindsay is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Twin Disc
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Lindsay
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 2 more articles in the media than Lindsay. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Twin Disc and 2 mentions for Lindsay. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Lindsay's score of 0.00 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Twin Disc
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Lindsay
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Lindsay beats Twin Disc on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Douglas Dynamics?

Douglas Dynamics (NYSE:PLOW) and Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) are both small-cap construction & farm machinery & heavy trucks companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Douglas Dynamics presently has a consensus target price of $54.67, suggesting a potential upside of 0.81%. Given Douglas Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Douglas Dynamics is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Douglas Dynamics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.50
Twin Disc
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Douglas Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Douglas Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Douglas Dynamics$656.05M1.91$46.90M$2.2224.43
Twin Disc$340.74M1.00-$1.89M$1.8412.79

Douglas Dynamics has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Twin Disc's net margin of 7.32%. Douglas Dynamics' return on equity of 19.72% beat Twin Disc's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Douglas Dynamics7.83% 19.72% 8.34%
Twin Disc 7.32%2.77%1.29%

Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Twin Disc has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Douglas Dynamics pays an annual dividend of $1.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Douglas Dynamics pays out 53.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Twin Disc pays out 8.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 3 more articles in the media than Douglas Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Twin Disc and 1 mentions for Douglas Dynamics. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Douglas Dynamics' score of 1.05 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Douglas Dynamics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Twin Disc
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

91.9% of Douglas Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of Twin Disc shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Douglas Dynamics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Douglas Dynamics beats Twin Disc on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Miller Industries?

Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) and Miller Industries (NYSE:MLR) are both small-cap construction & farm machinery & heavy trucks companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

Miller Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Twin Disc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Miller Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Twin Disc$340.74M1.00-$1.89M$1.8412.79
Miller Industries$790.27M0.76$23.01M$1.3439.23

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Miller Industries has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

65.3% of Twin Disc shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.2% of Miller Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Miller Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Miller Industries has a consensus price target of $50.00, indicating a potential downside of 4.87%. Given Miller Industries' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Miller Industries is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Twin Disc
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Miller Industries
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 1 more articles in the media than Miller Industries. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Twin Disc and 3 mentions for Miller Industries. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Miller Industries' score of 0.31 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Twin Disc
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Miller Industries
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Miller Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Twin Disc pays out 8.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Miller Industries pays out 62.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Miller Industries has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Miller Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Twin Disc has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Miller Industries' net margin of 2.08%. Miller Industries' return on equity of 3.70% beat Twin Disc's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Twin Disc7.32% 2.77% 1.29%
Miller Industries 2.08%3.70%2.58%

Summary

Miller Industries beats Twin Disc on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Wabash National?

Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) and Wabash National (NYSE:WNC) are both small-cap construction & farm machinery & heavy trucks companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 3 more articles in the media than Wabash National. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Twin Disc and 1 mentions for Wabash National. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Wabash National's score of 1.14 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Twin Disc
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Wabash National
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Wabash National has higher revenue and earnings than Twin Disc. Wabash National is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Twin Disc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Twin Disc$340.74M1.00-$1.89M$1.8412.79
Wabash National$1.54B0.36$211.45M-$1.60N/A

Wabash National has a consensus price target of $14.50, suggesting a potential upside of 4.94%. Given Wabash National's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Wabash National is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Twin Disc
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Wabash National
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wabash National has a beta of 1.55, suggesting that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market.

Twin Disc pays an annual dividend of $0.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Wabash National pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Twin Disc pays out 8.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Wabash National pays out -20.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Wabash National is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Twin Disc has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Wabash National's net margin of -4.41%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 2.77% beat Wabash National's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Twin Disc7.32% 2.77% 1.29%
Wabash National -4.41%-30.16%-8.79%

65.3% of Twin Disc shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.1% of Wabash National shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Wabash National shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Twin Disc beats Wabash National on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Twin Disc compare to Titan International?

Twin Disc (NASDAQ:TWIN) and Titan International (NYSE:TWI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

65.3% of Twin Disc shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Titan International shares are held by institutional investors. 22.1% of Twin Disc shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Titan International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Twin Disc has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Titan International has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Twin Disc had 4 more articles in the media than Titan International. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Twin Disc and 0 mentions for Titan International. Twin Disc's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Titan International's score of -0.30 indicating that Twin Disc is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Twin Disc Positive
Titan International Neutral

Titan International has a consensus target price of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 66.54%. Given Titan International's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Titan International is more favorable than Twin Disc.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Twin Disc
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Titan International
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Twin Disc has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Titan International. Titan International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Twin Disc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Twin Disc$340.74M1.00-$1.89M$1.8412.79
Titan International$1.83B0.27-$63.49M-$1.37N/A

Twin Disc has a net margin of 7.32% compared to Titan International's net margin of -4.72%. Twin Disc's return on equity of 2.77% beat Titan International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Twin Disc7.32% 2.77% 1.29%
Titan International -4.72%-3.00%-0.95%

Summary

Twin Disc beats Titan International on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Twin Disc News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TWIN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TWIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TWIN vs. The Competition

MetricTwin DiscMACH IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$348.89M$15.89B$9.55B$12.20B
Dividend Yield0.66%1.27%3.54%6.22%
P/E Ratio12.7941.9725.6524.36
Price / Sales1.006.154,816.57102.43
Price / Cash26.3239.0027.3836.93
Price / Book2.035.044.616.49
Net Income-$1.89M$445.35M$791.01M$336.61M
7 Day Performance6.23%0.15%0.09%1.25%
1 Month Performance41.13%3.84%-1.23%0.24%
1 Year Performance166.59%32.83%21.09%30.16%

Twin Disc Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TWIN
Twin Disc
1.9412 of 5 stars
$23.54
-2.7%
N/A+154.8%$348.89M$340.74M12.79760
LNN
Lindsay
2.6925 of 5 stars
$116.91
+0.2%
$113.00
-3.3%
-12.6%$1.21B$676.37M21.411,275
PLOW
Douglas Dynamics
4.2942 of 5 stars
$49.46
-0.8%
$54.67
+10.5%
+87.0%$1.15B$656.05M22.281,764
MLR
Miller Industries
2.4541 of 5 stars
$49.78
+0.1%
$50.00
+0.4%
+18.3%$566.71M$790.27M37.151,535
WNC
Wabash National
1.6088 of 5 stars
$12.64
+4.8%
$14.50
+14.7%
+28.2%$490.53M$1.54BN/A4,700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:TWIN) was last updated on 6/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners