Miller Industries (MLR) Competitors

Greenbrier Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Miller Industries. Greenbrier Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Miller Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Greenbrier Companies pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Miller Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Greenbrier Companies pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Miller Industries pays out 62.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Greenbrier Companies has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Miller Industries has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Greenbrier Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Miller Industries had 1 more articles in the media than Greenbrier Companies. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Miller Industries and 1 mentions for Greenbrier Companies. Miller Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Greenbrier Companies' score of 0.00 indicating that Miller Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Greenbrier Companies has a net margin of 5.12% compared to Miller Industries' net margin of 2.08%. Greenbrier Companies' return on equity of 8.94% beat Miller Industries' return on equity.

95.6% of Greenbrier Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.2% of Miller Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Greenbrier Companies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Miller Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Greenbrier Companies currently has a consensus target price of $49.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.06%. Miller Industries has a consensus target price of $50.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.49%. Given Miller Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Miller Industries is more favorable than Greenbrier Companies.

Greenbrier Companies has a beta of 1.44, indicating that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Miller Industries has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

79.2% of Miller Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Astec Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Miller Industries shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Astec Industries shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Miller Industries currently has a consensus target price of $50.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.49%. Given Miller Industries' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Miller Industries is more favorable than Astec Industries.

Astec Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Miller Industries. Miller Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Astec Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Miller Industries and Miller Industries both had 2 articles in the media. Miller Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Astec Industries' score of 0.29 indicating that Miller Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Miller Industries has a net margin of 2.08% compared to Astec Industries' net margin of 1.75%. Astec Industries' return on equity of 10.09% beat Miller Industries' return on equity.

Miller Industries has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Astec Industries has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

Miller Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Astec Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Miller Industries pays out 62.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Astec Industries pays out 46.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Miller Industries has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Miller Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Lindsay has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Miller Industries has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Lindsay has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Miller Industries. Lindsay is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Miller Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

89.9% of Lindsay shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.2% of Miller Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Lindsay shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Miller Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Miller Industries had 2 more articles in the media than Lindsay. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Miller Industries and 0 mentions for Lindsay. Miller Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Lindsay's score of -0.40 indicating that Miller Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Lindsay currently has a consensus target price of $113.00, suggesting a potential downside of 1.52%. Miller Industries has a consensus target price of $50.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.49%. Given Miller Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Miller Industries is more favorable than Lindsay.

Lindsay pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Miller Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Lindsay pays out 27.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Miller Industries pays out 62.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lindsay has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years and Miller Industries has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Lindsay has a net margin of 9.25% compared to Miller Industries' net margin of 2.08%. Lindsay's return on equity of 11.28% beat Miller Industries' return on equity.

Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Miller Industries has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Douglas Dynamics currently has a consensus target price of $54.67, suggesting a potential upside of 18.76%. Miller Industries has a consensus target price of $50.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.49%. Given Douglas Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Douglas Dynamics is more favorable than Miller Industries.

91.9% of Douglas Dynamics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.2% of Miller Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Douglas Dynamics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Miller Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Douglas Dynamics pays an annual dividend of $1.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Miller Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Douglas Dynamics pays out 53.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Miller Industries pays out 62.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Miller Industries has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Douglas Dynamics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Douglas Dynamics had 2 more articles in the media than Miller Industries. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Douglas Dynamics and 2 mentions for Miller Industries. Douglas Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Miller Industries' score of 0.30 indicating that Douglas Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Douglas Dynamics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Miller Industries. Douglas Dynamics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Miller Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Douglas Dynamics has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Miller Industries' net margin of 2.08%. Douglas Dynamics' return on equity of 19.72% beat Miller Industries' return on equity.