Miller Industries (MLR) Competitors

In the previous week, Greenbrier Companies had 1 more articles in the media than Miller Industries. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Greenbrier Companies and 2 mentions for Miller Industries. Miller Industries' average media sentiment score of -0.14 beat Greenbrier Companies' score of -0.50 indicating that Miller Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

95.6% of Greenbrier Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.2% of Miller Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Greenbrier Companies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Miller Industries shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Greenbrier Companies has a net margin of 5.12% compared to Miller Industries' net margin of 2.08%. Greenbrier Companies' return on equity of 8.94% beat Miller Industries' return on equity.

Greenbrier Companies has a beta of 1.44, suggesting that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Miller Industries has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Greenbrier Companies currently has a consensus price target of $49.00, indicating a potential downside of 0.31%. Miller Industries has a consensus price target of $50.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.75%. Given Greenbrier Companies' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Greenbrier Companies is more favorable than Miller Industries.

Greenbrier Companies pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Miller Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Greenbrier Companies pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Miller Industries pays out 62.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Greenbrier Companies has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Miller Industries has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Greenbrier Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Greenbrier Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Miller Industries. Greenbrier Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Miller Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Astec Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Miller Industries. Miller Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Astec Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Miller Industries presently has a consensus target price of $50.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.75%. Given Miller Industries' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Miller Industries is more favorable than Astec Industries.

In the previous week, Astec Industries had 2 more articles in the media than Miller Industries. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Astec Industries and 2 mentions for Miller Industries. Astec Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Miller Industries' score of -0.14 indicating that Astec Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Miller Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Astec Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Miller Industries pays out 62.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Astec Industries pays out 46.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Miller Industries has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Miller Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Miller Industries has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Astec Industries has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

79.2% of Miller Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Astec Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Miller Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Astec Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Miller Industries has a net margin of 2.08% compared to Astec Industries' net margin of 1.75%. Astec Industries' return on equity of 10.09% beat Miller Industries' return on equity.

Miller Industries currently has a consensus price target of $50.00, suggesting a potential downside of 1.75%. Lindsay has a consensus price target of $113.00, suggesting a potential downside of 8.69%. Given Miller Industries' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Miller Industries is more favorable than Lindsay.

Miller Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Lindsay pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Miller Industries pays out 62.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lindsay pays out 27.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Miller Industries has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Lindsay has increased its dividend for 22 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Miller Industries and Miller Industries both had 2 articles in the media. Lindsay's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Miller Industries' score of -0.14 indicating that Lindsay is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

79.2% of Miller Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.9% of Lindsay shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Miller Industries shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Lindsay shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lindsay has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Miller Industries. Lindsay is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Miller Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Lindsay has a net margin of 9.25% compared to Miller Industries' net margin of 2.08%. Lindsay's return on equity of 11.28% beat Miller Industries' return on equity.

Miller Industries has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lindsay has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Douglas Dynamics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Miller Industries. Douglas Dynamics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Miller Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

91.9% of Douglas Dynamics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.2% of Miller Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Douglas Dynamics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Miller Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Douglas Dynamics presently has a consensus price target of $54.67, indicating a potential upside of 1.36%. Miller Industries has a consensus price target of $50.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.75%. Given Douglas Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Douglas Dynamics is more favorable than Miller Industries.

Douglas Dynamics has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Miller Industries' net margin of 2.08%. Douglas Dynamics' return on equity of 19.72% beat Miller Industries' return on equity.

Douglas Dynamics pays an annual dividend of $1.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Miller Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Douglas Dynamics pays out 53.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Miller Industries pays out 62.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Miller Industries has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Douglas Dynamics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Miller Industries had 1 more articles in the media than Douglas Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Miller Industries and 1 mentions for Douglas Dynamics. Douglas Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Miller Industries' score of -0.14 indicating that Douglas Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Douglas Dynamics has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Miller Industries has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.