Go Pro
→ Your book attached (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free CAAS Stock Alerts

China Automotive Systems (CAAS) Competitors

China Automotive Systems logo
$4.72 +0.02 (+0.43%)
Closing price 08/14/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$4.70 -0.01 (-0.32%)
As of 08/14/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

CAAS vs. ECX, HLLY, STRT, MPAA, and SRI

Should you buy China Automotive Systems stock or one of its competitors? China Automotive Systems's main competitors and comparable companies include ECARX (ECX), Holley (HLLY), Strattec Security (STRT), Motorcar Parts of America (MPAA), and Stoneridge (SRI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "automotive parts & equipment" industry.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to ECARX?

ECARX (NASDAQ:ECX) and China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ECARX
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

China Automotive Systems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than ECARX. ECARX is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ECARX$847.90M0.45-$66.04M-$0.05N/A
China Automotive Systems$834.86M0.17$42.84M$1.423.32

In the previous week, ECARX had 3 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for ECARX and 7 mentions for China Automotive Systems. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat ECARX's score of 0.70 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ECARX
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
China Automotive Systems
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

ECARX has a beta of 1, suggesting that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to ECARX's net margin of -2.25%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat ECARX's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ECARX-2.25% N/A -2.75%
China Automotive Systems 5.59%10.58%5.07%

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.0% of ECARX shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats ECARX on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Holley?

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Holley (NYSE:HLLY) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

Holley has a consensus price target of $4.90, suggesting a potential upside of 57.81%. Given Holley's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Holley is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Holley
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

In the previous week, Holley had 1 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Holley and 7 mentions for China Automotive Systems. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Holley's score of 0.76 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
China Automotive Systems
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Holley
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Holley has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its share price is 31% more volatile than the broader market.

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.7% of Holley shares are owned by institutional investors. 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of Holley shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Holley. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Holley, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems$834.86M0.17$42.84M$1.423.32
Holley$613.15M0.61$19.17M$0.0838.81

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Holley's net margin of 1.68%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Holley's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Automotive Systems5.59% 10.58% 5.07%
Holley 1.68%8.41%3.23%

Summary

Holley beats China Automotive Systems on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Strattec Security?

Strattec Security (NASDAQ:STRT) and China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Strattec Security's net margin of 4.31%. Strattec Security's return on equity of 11.00% beat China Automotive Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Strattec Security4.31% 11.00% 7.22%
China Automotive Systems 5.59%10.58%5.07%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Strattec Security
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, China Automotive Systems had 4 more articles in the media than Strattec Security. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for China Automotive Systems and 3 mentions for Strattec Security. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Strattec Security's score of 0.64 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Strattec Security
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
China Automotive Systems
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Strattec Security. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Strattec Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Strattec Security$565.07M0.62$18.68M$6.0613.75
China Automotive Systems$834.86M0.17$42.84M$1.423.32

68.9% of Strattec Security shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of Strattec Security shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Strattec Security has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Strattec Security beats China Automotive Systems on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Motorcar Parts of America?

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Motorcar Parts of America (NASDAQ:MPAA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.5% of Motorcar Parts of America shares are owned by institutional investors. 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.4% of Motorcar Parts of America shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Motorcar Parts of America's net margin of -0.53%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Automotive Systems5.59% 10.58% 5.07%
Motorcar Parts of America -0.53%-0.57%-0.15%

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Motorcar Parts of America. Motorcar Parts of America is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems$834.86M0.17$42.84M$1.423.32
Motorcar Parts of America$789.81M0.30$12.39M-$0.31N/A

In the previous week, Motorcar Parts of America had 6 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Motorcar Parts of America and 7 mentions for China Automotive Systems. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Motorcar Parts of America's score of 0.04 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
China Automotive Systems
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Motorcar Parts of America
0 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Motorcar Parts of America has a consensus price target of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 52.49%. Given Motorcar Parts of America's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Motorcar Parts of America is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Motorcar Parts of America
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Motorcar Parts of America on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Stoneridge?

Stoneridge (NYSE:SRI) and China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

98.1% of Stoneridge shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 11.0% of Stoneridge shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Stoneridge currently has a consensus price target of $16.00, indicating a potential upside of 122.22%. Given Stoneridge's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Stoneridge is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Stoneridge
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

China Automotive Systems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Stoneridge. Stoneridge is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Stoneridge$861.26M0.24-$102.83M-$4.26N/A
China Automotive Systems$834.86M0.17$42.84M$1.423.32

Stoneridge has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Stoneridge's net margin of -15.64%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Stoneridge's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Stoneridge-15.64% -24.91% -8.33%
China Automotive Systems 5.59%10.58%5.07%

In the previous week, Stoneridge and Stoneridge both had 7 articles in the media. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Stoneridge's score of 0.92 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Stoneridge
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
China Automotive Systems
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Stoneridge on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get China Automotive Systems News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CAAS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CAAS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CAAS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricChina Automotive SystemsAutomobile Components IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$142.41M$5.10B$13.19B$13.07B
Dividend YieldN/A2.23%54.81%10.45%
P/E Ratio3.3211.3746.9525.33
Price / Sales0.1723.6590.5776.83
Price / Cash2.8311.0326.4050.90
Price / Book0.371.844.336.25
Net Income$42.84M$72.28M$444.06M$347.82M
7 Day Performance6.79%0.63%-0.42%1.08%
1 Month Performance6.55%2.73%1.54%0.82%
1 Year Performance16.26%8.49%0.71%20.99%

China Automotive Systems Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CAAS
China Automotive Systems
1.9283 of 5 stars		$4.72
+0.4%		N/A+14.6%$142.41M$834.86M3.324,370
ECX
ECARX
0.3573 of 5 stars		$1.10
flat		N/A-32.7%$392.11M$847.90MN/A1,432
HLLY
Holley
3.8361 of 5 stars		$3.18
+5.5%		$4.90
+54.3%		-14.3%$385.04M$613.15M39.691,483
STRT
Strattec Security
1.9144 of 5 stars		$86.39
-0.5%		N/A+10.6%$361.01M$565.07M14.262,848
MPAA
Motorcar Parts of America
3.0186 of 5 stars		$13.63
+0.2%		$19.00
+39.4%		-12.3%$258.06M$789.81M24.785,600

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CAAS) was last updated on 8/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel