Go Pro
→ The end may be near for these iconic stocks (From Chaikin Analytics) (Ad)tc pixel Free CAAS Stock Alerts

China Automotive Systems (CAAS) Competitors

China Automotive Systems logo
$4.96 -0.12 (-2.26%)
As of 02:58 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

CAAS vs. CPS, ECX, HLLY, STRT, and MPAA

Should you buy China Automotive Systems stock or one of its competitors? China Automotive Systems's main competitors and comparable companies include Cooper-Standard (CPS), ECARX (ECX), Holley (HLLY), Strattec Security (STRT), and Motorcar Parts of America (MPAA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "automotive parts & equipment" industry.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Cooper-Standard?

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Cooper-Standard (NYSE:CPS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cooper-Standard has a beta of 2.01, suggesting that its stock price is 101% more volatile than the broader market.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Cooper-Standard's net margin of -2.03%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Cooper-Standard's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Automotive Systems5.59% 10.58% 5.07%
Cooper-Standard -2.03%N/A -2.31%

China Automotive Systems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cooper-Standard. Cooper-Standard is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems$765.74M0.20$42.84M$1.423.50
Cooper-Standard$2.74B0.15-$4.16M-$3.14N/A

Cooper-Standard has a consensus target price of $48.33, indicating a potential upside of 114.22%. Given Cooper-Standard's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cooper-Standard is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Cooper-Standard
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.1% of Cooper-Standard shares are owned by institutional investors. 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.2% of Cooper-Standard shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Cooper-Standard had 1 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Cooper-Standard and 3 mentions for China Automotive Systems. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat Cooper-Standard's score of 1.11 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
China Automotive Systems
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cooper-Standard
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Cooper-Standard on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to ECARX?

ECARX (NASDAQ:ECX) and China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

China Automotive Systems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than ECARX. ECARX is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ECARX$847.90M0.46-$66.04M-$0.05N/A
China Automotive Systems$765.74M0.20$42.84M$1.423.50

ECARX has a beta of 1, indicating that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 20.0% of ECARX shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to ECARX's net margin of -2.25%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat ECARX's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ECARX-2.25% N/A -2.75%
China Automotive Systems 5.59%10.58%5.07%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ECARX
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, China Automotive Systems had 2 more articles in the media than ECARX. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for China Automotive Systems and 1 mentions for ECARX. ECARX's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 1.47 indicating that ECARX is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
ECARX Very Positive
China Automotive Systems Positive

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats ECARX on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Holley?

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Holley (NYSE:HLLY) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Holley has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market.

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.7% of Holley shares are owned by institutional investors. 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of Holley shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Holley's net margin of 1.68%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Holley's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Automotive Systems5.59% 10.58% 5.07%
Holley 1.68%8.41%3.23%

Holley has a consensus price target of $4.90, suggesting a potential upside of 97.18%. Given Holley's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Holley is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Holley
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

In the previous week, Holley had 2 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Holley and 3 mentions for China Automotive Systems. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat Holley's score of -0.14 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
China Automotive Systems
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Holley
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Holley. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Holley, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems$765.74M0.20$42.84M$1.423.50
Holley$613.51M0.49$19.17M$0.0831.06

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Holley on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Strattec Security?

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Strattec Security (NASDAQ:STRT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

Strattec Security has a consensus target price of $83.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.06%. Given Strattec Security's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Strattec Security is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Strattec Security
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Strattec Security. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Strattec Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems$765.74M0.20$42.84M$1.423.50
Strattec Security$579.39M0.46$20.60M$5.0013.38

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strattec Security has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, China Automotive Systems had 2 more articles in the media than Strattec Security. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for China Automotive Systems and 1 mentions for Strattec Security. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat Strattec Security's score of 0.42 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
China Automotive Systems Positive
Strattec Security Neutral

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Strattec Security's net margin of 3.56%. Strattec Security's return on equity of 10.79% beat China Automotive Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Automotive Systems5.59% 10.58% 5.07%
Strattec Security 3.56%10.79%7.23%

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.9% of Strattec Security shares are held by institutional investors. 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Strattec Security shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Strattec Security beats China Automotive Systems on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Motorcar Parts of America?

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Motorcar Parts of America (NASDAQ:MPAA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, China Automotive Systems had 2 more articles in the media than Motorcar Parts of America. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for China Automotive Systems and 1 mentions for Motorcar Parts of America. Motorcar Parts of America's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 1.47 indicating that Motorcar Parts of America is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
China Automotive Systems Positive
Motorcar Parts of America Very Positive

China Automotive Systems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Motorcar Parts of America. Motorcar Parts of America is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems$765.74M0.20$42.84M$1.423.50
Motorcar Parts of America$789.81M0.26$12.39M-$0.31N/A

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Motorcar Parts of America's net margin of -0.53%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Automotive Systems5.59% 10.58% 5.07%
Motorcar Parts of America -0.53%-0.57%-0.15%

Motorcar Parts of America has a consensus target price of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 68.86%. Given Motorcar Parts of America's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Motorcar Parts of America is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Motorcar Parts of America
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.5% of Motorcar Parts of America shares are owned by institutional investors. 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.4% of Motorcar Parts of America shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Motorcar Parts of America on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get China Automotive Systems News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CAAS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CAAS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CAAS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricChina Automotive SystemsAutomobile Components IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$149.79M$4.80B$12.36B$13.15B
Dividend YieldN/A2.31%60.55%12.57%
P/E Ratio3.5010.4444.1725.82
Price / Sales0.2040.3293.60110.71
Price / Cash3.0510.7328.5252.76
Price / Book0.381.633.946.32
Net Income$42.84M$70.95M$445.57M$359.77M
7 Day Performance-1.49%-1.57%-0.46%-0.10%
1 Month Performance-7.02%-5.47%-5.32%-4.01%
1 Year Performance0.91%-1.55%-7.23%6.23%

China Automotive Systems Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CAAS
China Automotive Systems
2.1957 of 5 stars		$4.97
-2.3%		N/A+4.5%$149.79M$765.74M3.504,370
CPS
Cooper-Standard
3.8778 of 5 stars		$22.84
+0.3%		$48.33
+111.6%		-40.8%$406.91M$91.38BN/A22,000
ECX
ECARX
0.7906 of 5 stars		$1.02
-3.3%		N/A-47.9%$363.60M$847.90MN/A1,432
HLLY
Holley
3.7131 of 5 stars		$2.56
-3.6%		$4.90
+91.8%		-24.6%$307.93M$613.51M31.941,483
STRT
Strattec Security
4.1682 of 5 stars		$67.58
-1.3%		$83.00
+22.8%		-4.4%$269.31M$579.39M13.522,654

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CAAS) was last updated on 9/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's New Dollar
Porter Stansberry says President Trump has signed an executive order initiating what he calls a full U.S. doll...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s Why Trump Won’t End The Iran War
Trump has called an Iran deal close 38 times since the war began, yet the fighting keeps flaring back up. O...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Bank of America: 'Digital Dollar Inevitable'
Bank of America just revealed your expiration date. In their Bloomberg interview, they didn't just predict the...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel