Free Trial

China Automotive Systems (CAAS) Competitors

China Automotive Systems logo
$4.45 -0.01 (-0.22%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$4.43 -0.02 (-0.34%)
As of 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CAAS vs. HLLY, HYLN, STRT, NIU, and MPAA

Should you be buying China Automotive Systems stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of China Automotive Systems include Holley (HLLY), Hyliion (HYLN), Strattec Security (STRT), Niu Technologies (NIU), and Motorcar Parts of America (MPAA). These companies are all part of the "automobiles and trucks" industry.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Holley?

Holley (NYSE:HLLY) and China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Holley. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Holley, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Holley$613.51M0.64$19.17M$0.1521.75
China Automotive Systems$765.74M0.18$42.84M$1.423.13

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Holley's net margin of 3.13%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Holley's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Holley3.13% 4.84% 1.83%
China Automotive Systems 5.59%10.58%5.07%

Holley presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 53.28%. Given Holley's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Holley is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Holley
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

39.7% of Holley shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of Holley shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Holley has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Holley had 2 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Holley and 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems. Holley's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 0.00 indicating that Holley is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Holley
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
China Automotive Systems
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Holley beats China Automotive Systems on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Hyliion?

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Hyliion (NYSE:HYLN) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Hyliion has a consensus target price of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 116.45%. Given Hyliion's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hyliion is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Hyliion
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Hyliion's net margin of 0.00%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Hyliion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Automotive Systems5.59% 10.58% 5.07%
Hyliion N/A -19.83%-18.78%

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.8% of Hyliion shares are owned by institutional investors. 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 21.4% of Hyliion shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hyliion has a beta of 2.59, indicating that its stock price is 159% more volatile than the S&P 500.

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Hyliion. Hyliion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems$765.74M0.18$42.84M$1.423.13
Hyliion$3.48M118.20-$123.51M-$0.33N/A

In the previous week, Hyliion had 1 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Hyliion and 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Hyliion'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
China Automotive Systems
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Hyliion
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Hyliion on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Strattec Security?

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Strattec Security (NASDAQ:STRT) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability.

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Strattec Security. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Strattec Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems$765.74M0.18$42.84M$1.423.13
Strattec Security$586.03M0.53$18.68M$6.6011.20

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Strattec Security has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Strattec Security
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Strattec Security's net margin of 4.63%. Strattec Security's return on equity of 12.33% beat China Automotive Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Automotive Systems5.59% 10.58% 5.07%
Strattec Security 4.63%12.33%7.89%

In the previous week, Strattec Security had 3 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Strattec Security and 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems. Strattec Security's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 0.00 indicating that Strattec Security is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
China Automotive Systems
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Strattec Security
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.9% of Strattec Security shares are owned by institutional investors. 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Strattec Security shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Strattec Security beats China Automotive Systems on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Niu Technologies?

Niu Technologies (NASDAQ:NIU) and China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, China Automotive Systems had 1 more articles in the media than Niu Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems and 0 mentions for Niu Technologies. Niu Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled China Automotive Systems'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Niu Technologies Neutral
China Automotive Systems Neutral

Niu Technologies has a beta of -0.07, meaning that its share price is 107% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

China Automotive Systems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Niu Technologies. Niu Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Niu Technologies$4.31B0.06-$5.63M-$0.08N/A
China Automotive Systems$765.74M0.18$42.84M$1.423.13

Niu Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $3.50, indicating a potential upside of 13.27%. Given Niu Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Niu Technologies is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Niu Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Niu Technologies' net margin of -0.94%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Niu Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Niu Technologies-0.94% -4.37% -1.35%
China Automotive Systems 5.59%10.58%5.07%

75.1% of Niu Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.2% of Niu Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Niu Technologies on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Motorcar Parts of America?

Motorcar Parts of America (NASDAQ:MPAA) and China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Motorcar Parts of America's net margin of 0.25%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Motorcar Parts of America0.25% 3.68% 0.97%
China Automotive Systems 5.59%10.58%5.07%

Motorcar Parts of America currently has a consensus target price of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 67.40%. Given Motorcar Parts of America's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Motorcar Parts of America is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Motorcar Parts of America
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, China Automotive Systems had 1 more articles in the media than Motorcar Parts of America. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems and 0 mentions for Motorcar Parts of America. Motorcar Parts of America's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled China Automotive Systems'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Motorcar Parts of America Neutral
China Automotive Systems Neutral

Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

83.5% of Motorcar Parts of America shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of Motorcar Parts of America shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Motorcar Parts of America. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Motorcar Parts of America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Motorcar Parts of America$757.35M0.29-$19.47M$0.09126.11
China Automotive Systems$765.74M0.18$42.84M$1.423.13

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Motorcar Parts of America on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get China Automotive Systems News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CAAS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CAAS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CAAS vs. The Competition

MetricChina Automotive SystemsAUTO/TRUCK IndustryAuto SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$134.26M$5.82B$21.54B$11.87B
Dividend YieldN/A2.33%2.70%5.21%
P/E Ratio3.1326.3223.8828.47
Price / Sales0.1826.8416.5660.92
Price / Cash2.6611.8011.8336.52
Price / Book0.344.103.086.67
Net Income$42.84M$183.33M$426.71M$332.53M
7 Day Performance0.45%0.03%-0.33%2.03%
1 Month Performance6.46%8.45%4.59%9.23%
1 Year Performance15.89%30.69%9.43%39.62%

China Automotive Systems Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CAAS
China Automotive Systems
0.9454 of 5 stars
$4.45
-0.2%
N/AN/A$134.26M$765.74M3.134,370
HLLY
Holley
4.7911 of 5 stars
$3.09
-6.5%
$5.00
+62.1%
N/A$374.92M$613.51M20.571,483
HYLN
Hyliion
1.1789 of 5 stars
$2.04
+6.8%
$5.00
+145.1%
N/A$362.74M$3.48MN/A250
STRT
Strattec Security
2.444 of 5 stars
$72.60
-3.5%
N/AN/A$303.45M$565.07M11.002,848
NIU
Niu Technologies
0.9273 of 5 stars
$3.08
-0.6%
$3.50
+13.6%
N/A$240.94M$616.02MN/A700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CAAS) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners