China Automotive Systems Competitors

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Aptiv (NYSE:APTV) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

3.1% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of Aptiv shares are held by institutional investors. 63.3% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Aptiv shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares China Automotive Systems and Aptiv's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Aptiv has higher revenue and earnings than China Automotive Systems. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aptiv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 3.28, indicating that its stock price is 228% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Aptiv has a beta of 2.25, indicating that its stock price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for China Automotive Systems and Aptiv, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

China Automotive Systems presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.36%. Aptiv has a consensus price target of $130.25, suggesting a potential downside of 7.66%. Given China Automotive Systems' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe China Automotive Systems is more favorable than Aptiv.

Profitability

This table compares China Automotive Systems and Aptiv's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Aptiv beats China Automotive Systems on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Magna International (NYSE:MGA) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

3.1% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.5% of Magna International shares are held by institutional investors. 63.3% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares China Automotive Systems and Magna International's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Magna International has higher revenue and earnings than China Automotive Systems. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magna International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 3.28, indicating that its stock price is 228% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Magna International has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for China Automotive Systems and Magna International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

China Automotive Systems presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.36%. Magna International has a consensus price target of $83.1429, suggesting a potential downside of 12.98%. Given China Automotive Systems' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe China Automotive Systems is more favorable than Magna International.

Profitability

This table compares China Automotive Systems and Magna International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Magna International beats China Automotive Systems on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Icahn Enterprises (NASDAQ:IEP) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

3.1% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Icahn Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. 63.3% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 90.1% of Icahn Enterprises shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares China Automotive Systems and Icahn Enterprises' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

China Automotive Systems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Icahn Enterprises. Icahn Enterprises is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 3.28, indicating that its stock price is 228% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Icahn Enterprises has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for China Automotive Systems and Icahn Enterprises, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

China Automotive Systems presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.36%. Given China Automotive Systems' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe China Automotive Systems is more favorable than Icahn Enterprises.

Profitability

This table compares China Automotive Systems and Icahn Enterprises' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Icahn Enterprises on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and BorgWarner (NYSE:BWA) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

3.1% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.3% of BorgWarner shares are held by institutional investors. 63.3% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of BorgWarner shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares China Automotive Systems and BorgWarner's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

BorgWarner has higher revenue and earnings than China Automotive Systems. BorgWarner is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 3.28, indicating that its stock price is 228% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, BorgWarner has a beta of 1.76, indicating that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for China Automotive Systems and BorgWarner, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

China Automotive Systems presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.36%. BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $46.5333, suggesting a potential downside of 4.96%. Given China Automotive Systems' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe China Automotive Systems is more favorable than BorgWarner.

Profitability

This table compares China Automotive Systems and BorgWarner's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

BorgWarner beats China Automotive Systems on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Lear (NYSE:LEA) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares China Automotive Systems and Lear's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for China Automotive Systems and Lear, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

China Automotive Systems presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.36%. Lear has a consensus price target of $172.3571, suggesting a potential downside of 5.43%. Given China Automotive Systems' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe China Automotive Systems is more favorable than Lear.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

3.1% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.8% of Lear shares are held by institutional investors. 63.3% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Lear shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 3.28, indicating that its stock price is 228% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lear has a beta of 1.62, indicating that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares China Automotive Systems and Lear's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Lear has higher revenue and earnings than China Automotive Systems. Lear is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Lear beats China Automotive Systems on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Gentex (NASDAQ:GNTX) and China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Gentex and China Automotive Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Gentex and China Automotive Systems, as provided by MarketBeat.

Gentex currently has a consensus target price of $31.5714, suggesting a potential downside of 12.37%. China Automotive Systems has a consensus target price of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.36%. Given China Automotive Systems' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe China Automotive Systems is more favorable than Gentex.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

81.5% of Gentex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.1% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Gentex shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 63.3% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Gentex has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Automotive Systems has a beta of 3.28, indicating that its share price is 228% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Gentex and China Automotive Systems' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gentex has higher revenue and earnings than China Automotive Systems. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gentex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Gentex beats China Automotive Systems on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.