NASDAQ:CAAS

China Automotive Systems Competitors

$4.49
+0.05 (+1.13 %)
(As of 04/16/2021 04:00 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$4.27
Now: $4.49
$4.49
50-Day Range
$4.44
MA: $5.24
$6.33
52-Week Range
$1.61
Now: $4.49
$13.69
Volume74,772 shs
Average Volume256,016 shs
Market Capitalization$138.53 million
P/E Ratio449.00
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta3.28

Competitors

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) Vs. APTV, MGA, IEP, BWA, LEA, and GNTX

Should you be buying CAAS stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "motor vehicle parts & accessories" are considered alternatives and competitors to China Automotive Systems, including Aptiv (APTV), Magna International (MGA), Icahn Enterprises (IEP), BorgWarner (BWA), Lear (LEA), and Gentex (GNTX).

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Aptiv (NYSE:APTV) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

3.1% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of Aptiv shares are held by institutional investors. 63.3% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Aptiv shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares China Automotive Systems and Aptiv's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems$431.43 million0.32$9.96 million$0.3214.03
Aptiv$14.36 billion2.66$990 million$4.8029.39

Aptiv has higher revenue and earnings than China Automotive Systems. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aptiv, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 3.28, indicating that its stock price is 228% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Aptiv has a beta of 2.25, indicating that its stock price is 125% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for China Automotive Systems and Aptiv, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
China Automotive Systems01002.00
Aptiv241702.65

China Automotive Systems presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.36%. Aptiv has a consensus price target of $130.25, suggesting a potential downside of 7.66%. Given China Automotive Systems' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe China Automotive Systems is more favorable than Aptiv.

Profitability

This table compares China Automotive Systems and Aptiv's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
China Automotive SystemsN/AN/AN/A
Aptiv13.94%8.42%3.27%

Summary

Aptiv beats China Automotive Systems on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Magna International (NYSE:MGA) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

3.1% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.5% of Magna International shares are held by institutional investors. 63.3% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares China Automotive Systems and Magna International's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems$431.43 million0.32$9.96 million$0.3214.03
Magna International$39.43 billion0.73$1.77 billion$6.0515.79

Magna International has higher revenue and earnings than China Automotive Systems. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magna International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 3.28, indicating that its stock price is 228% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Magna International has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for China Automotive Systems and Magna International, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
China Automotive Systems01002.00
Magna International031002.77

China Automotive Systems presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.36%. Magna International has a consensus price target of $83.1429, suggesting a potential downside of 12.98%. Given China Automotive Systems' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe China Automotive Systems is more favorable than Magna International.

Profitability

This table compares China Automotive Systems and Magna International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
China Automotive SystemsN/AN/AN/A
Magna International1.46%7.31%3.02%

Summary

Magna International beats China Automotive Systems on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Icahn Enterprises (NASDAQ:IEP) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

3.1% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Icahn Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. 63.3% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 90.1% of Icahn Enterprises shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares China Automotive Systems and Icahn Enterprises' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems$431.43 million0.32$9.96 million$0.3214.03
Icahn Enterprises$8.99 billion1.53$-1,098,000,000.00($5.23)-10.91

China Automotive Systems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Icahn Enterprises. Icahn Enterprises is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 3.28, indicating that its stock price is 228% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Icahn Enterprises has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for China Automotive Systems and Icahn Enterprises, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
China Automotive Systems01002.00
Icahn Enterprises0000N/A

China Automotive Systems presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.36%. Given China Automotive Systems' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe China Automotive Systems is more favorable than Icahn Enterprises.

Profitability

This table compares China Automotive Systems and Icahn Enterprises' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
China Automotive SystemsN/AN/AN/A
Icahn Enterprises-24.19%-19.30%-7.90%

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Icahn Enterprises on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and BorgWarner (NYSE:BWA) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

3.1% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.3% of BorgWarner shares are held by institutional investors. 63.3% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of BorgWarner shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares China Automotive Systems and BorgWarner's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems$431.43 million0.32$9.96 million$0.3214.03
BorgWarner$10.17 billion1.15$746 million$4.1311.85

BorgWarner has higher revenue and earnings than China Automotive Systems. BorgWarner is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 3.28, indicating that its stock price is 228% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, BorgWarner has a beta of 1.76, indicating that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for China Automotive Systems and BorgWarner, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
China Automotive Systems01002.00
BorgWarner16702.43

China Automotive Systems presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.36%. BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $46.5333, suggesting a potential downside of 4.96%. Given China Automotive Systems' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe China Automotive Systems is more favorable than BorgWarner.

Profitability

This table compares China Automotive Systems and BorgWarner's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
China Automotive SystemsN/AN/AN/A
BorgWarner4.11%11.48%5.50%

Summary

BorgWarner beats China Automotive Systems on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Lear (NYSE:LEA) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares China Automotive Systems and Lear's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
China Automotive SystemsN/AN/AN/A
Lear0.50%6.17%2.06%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for China Automotive Systems and Lear, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
China Automotive Systems01002.00
Lear051202.71

China Automotive Systems presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.36%. Lear has a consensus price target of $172.3571, suggesting a potential downside of 5.43%. Given China Automotive Systems' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe China Automotive Systems is more favorable than Lear.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

3.1% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.8% of Lear shares are held by institutional investors. 63.3% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Lear shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 3.28, indicating that its stock price is 228% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lear has a beta of 1.62, indicating that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares China Automotive Systems and Lear's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems$431.43 million0.32$9.96 million$0.3214.03
Lear$19.81 billion0.55$753.60 million$13.9913.03

Lear has higher revenue and earnings than China Automotive Systems. Lear is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Lear beats China Automotive Systems on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Gentex (NASDAQ:GNTX) and China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Gentex and China Automotive Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Gentex18.96%16.59%14.42%
China Automotive SystemsN/AN/AN/A

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Gentex and China Automotive Systems, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Gentex12502.50
China Automotive Systems01002.00

Gentex currently has a consensus target price of $31.5714, suggesting a potential downside of 12.37%. China Automotive Systems has a consensus target price of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.36%. Given China Automotive Systems' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe China Automotive Systems is more favorable than Gentex.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

81.5% of Gentex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.1% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Gentex shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 63.3% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Gentex has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, China Automotive Systems has a beta of 3.28, indicating that its share price is 228% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Gentex and China Automotive Systems' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gentex$1.86 billion4.70$424.68 million$1.6621.70
China Automotive Systems$431.43 million0.32$9.96 million$0.3214.03

Gentex has higher revenue and earnings than China Automotive Systems. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gentex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Gentex beats China Automotive Systems on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


China Automotive Systems Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Aptiv logo
APTV
Aptiv
2.1$141.05+0.6%$38.15 billion$14.36 billion21.18
Magna International logo
MGA
Magna International
2.2$95.55+0.2%$28.84 billion$39.43 billion65.00Analyst Upgrade
Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
Icahn Enterprises logo
IEP
Icahn Enterprises
1.6$57.05+0.4%$13.77 billion$8.99 billion-6.44
BorgWarner logo
BWA
BorgWarner
2.2$48.96+2.2%$11.70 billion$10.17 billion27.98
Lear logo
LEA
Lear
2.2$182.25+0.3%$10.96 billion$19.81 billion103.55Analyst Downgrade
Gentex logo
GNTX
Gentex
2.2$36.03+0.5%$8.74 billion$1.86 billion29.53Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Autoliv logo
ALV
Autoliv
1.4$97.57+1.5%$8.53 billion$8.55 billion55.44Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
News Coverage
Luminar Technologies logo
LAZR
Luminar Technologies
1.3$17.67+2.2%$5.72 billionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
Luminar Technologies logo
LAZR
Luminar Technologies
1.3$17.67+2.2%$5.72 billionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
Allison Transmission logo
ALSN
Allison Transmission
2.2$44.80+0.9%$4.98 billion$2.70 billion15.03
Adient logo
ADNT
Adient
1.9$45.30+0.0%$4.27 billion$12.67 billion-7.78
Dana logo
DAN
Dana
1.8$26.70+0.2%$3.87 billion$8.62 billion-533.89Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
LCI Industries logo
LCII
LCI Industries
2.3$143.43+3.1%$3.62 billion$2.37 billion26.17Analyst Downgrade
Dorman Products logo
DORM
Dorman Products
1.4$107.20+0.6%$3.45 billion$991.33 million39.27
Visteon logo
VC
Visteon
1.2$120.20+0.9%$3.36 billion$2.95 billion-84.65Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Veoneer logo
VNE
Veoneer
0.9$25.78+0.5%$2.88 billion$1.90 billion-5.22Analyst Report
News Coverage
Gentherm logo
THRM
Gentherm
1.5$77.13+0.3%$2.55 billion$971.68 million70.76News Coverage
Patrick Industries logo
PATK
Patrick Industries
1.9$88.64+0.1%$2.11 billion$2.34 billion25.92News Coverage
Meritor logo
MTOR
Meritor
1.6$28.43+1.9%$2.06 billion$3.04 billion8.91News Coverage
Gap Down
Canoo logo
GOEV
Canoo
1.4$8.21+1.8%$1.95 billionN/A0.00
American Axle & Manufacturing logo
AXL
American Axle & Manufacturing
1.3$9.54+1.4%$1.09 billion$6.53 billion-1.02
Standard Motor Products logo
SMP
Standard Motor Products
2.1$43.19+0.6%$965.60 million$1.14 billion16.48News Coverage
Stoneridge logo
SRI
Stoneridge
1.2$31.82+1.5%$864.30 million$834.29 million-113.64News Coverage
Tenneco logo
TEN
Tenneco
1.3$10.82+0.6%$853.61 million$17.45 billion-0.44Insider Selling
Modine Manufacturing logo
MOD
Modine Manufacturing
1.4$15.54+0.1%$799.08 million$1.98 billion-141.27Increase in Short Interest
Lydall logo
LDL
Lydall
1.1$32.26+1.3%$581.45 million$837.40 million-3.87
Cooper-Standard logo
CPS
Cooper-Standard
1.2$32.33+3.7%$547.74 million$3.11 billion-1.77News Coverage
Motorcar Parts of America logo
MPAA
Motorcar Parts of America
1.2$22.76+2.7%$433.72 million$535.83 million151.73Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
Commercial Vehicle Group logo
CVGI
Commercial Vehicle Group
1.3$9.79+0.4%$318.30 million$901.24 million-7.47Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Horizon Global logo
HZN
Horizon Global
0.7$8.05+10.4%$216.71 million$690.45 million-3.25High Trading Volume
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Down
Strattec Security logo
STRT
Strattec Security
1.2$51.43+2.5%$198.98 million$385.30 million-197.80Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Superior Industries International logo
SUP
Superior Industries International
1.5$4.93+3.7%$126.17 million$1.37 billion-0.35
This page was last updated on 4/18/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.