Do analysts prefer CPS or CAAS?

Cooper-Standard currently has a consensus target price of $49.33, suggesting a potential upside of 77.88%. Given Cooper-Standard's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Cooper-Standard is more favorable than China Automotive Systems. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Cooper-Standard 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 China Automotive Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media refer more to CPS or CAAS?

In the previous week, Cooper-Standard and Cooper-Standard both had 1 articles in the media. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Cooper-Standard's score of 0.00 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cooper-Standard 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral China Automotive Systems 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate SERV or CAAS?

Serve Robotics presently has a consensus price target of $17.51, suggesting a potential upside of 244.09%. Given Serve Robotics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Serve Robotics is more favorable than China Automotive Systems. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Serve Robotics 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 7 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 China Automotive Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media refer more to SERV or CAAS?

In the previous week, Serve Robotics had 1 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Serve Robotics and 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems. Serve Robotics' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 0.82 indicating that Serve Robotics is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Serve Robotics 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive China Automotive Systems 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate CAAS or STRT?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score China Automotive Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Strattec Security 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media prefer CAAS or STRT?

In the previous week, Strattec Security had 1 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Strattec Security and 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems. Strattec Security's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 0.82 indicating that Strattec Security is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment China Automotive Systems 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Strattec Security 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate HLLY or CAAS?

Holley currently has a consensus target price of $4.90, suggesting a potential upside of 86.60%. Given Holley's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Holley is more favorable than China Automotive Systems. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Holley 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.71 China Automotive Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media favor HLLY or CAAS?

In the previous week, Holley had 1 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Holley and 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Holley's score of 0.20 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Holley 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral China Automotive Systems 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor MPAA or CAAS?

In the previous week, Motorcar Parts of America and Motorcar Parts of America both had 1 articles in the media. Motorcar Parts of America's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 0.82 indicating that Motorcar Parts of America is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Motorcar Parts of America 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive China Automotive Systems 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

China Automotive Systems (CAAS) Competitors

$4.39 +0.03 (+0.69%)

Closing price 07/17/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$4.40 +0.01 (+0.23%)

As of 07/17/2026 04:10 PM Eastern

Compare

CAAS vs. CPS, SERV, STRT, HLLY, and MPAA

Should you buy China Automotive Systems stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares China Automotive Systems with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with China Automotive Systems include Cooper-Standard (CPS), Serve Robotics (SERV), Strattec Security (STRT), Holley (HLLY), and Motorcar Parts of America (MPAA). These companies are all part of the "automobiles and trucks" industry.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Cooper-Standard?

Cooper-Standard (NYSE:CPS) and China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and dividends.

Cooper-Standard currently has a consensus target price of $49.33, suggesting a potential upside of 77.88%. Given Cooper-Standard's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Cooper-Standard is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cooper-Standard	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
China Automotive Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

China Automotive Systems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cooper-Standard. Cooper-Standard is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cooper-Standard	$2.74B	0.18	-$4.16M	-$2.18	N/A
China Automotive Systems	$765.74M	0.17	$42.84M	$1.42	3.09

Cooper-Standard has a beta of 1.99, indicating that its stock price is 99% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

69.1% of Cooper-Standard shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.2% of Cooper-Standard shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Cooper-Standard's net margin of -1.41%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Cooper-Standard's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cooper-Standard	-1.41%	N/A	-2.15%
China Automotive Systems	5.59%	10.58%	5.07%

In the previous week, Cooper-Standard and Cooper-Standard both had 1 articles in the media. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Cooper-Standard's score of 0.00 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cooper-Standard	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
China Automotive Systems	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Cooper-Standard on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Serve Robotics?

Serve Robotics (NASDAQ:SERV) and China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) are both small-cap automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Serve Robotics' net margin of -2,639.98%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Serve Robotics' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Serve Robotics	-2,639.98%	-47.31%	-44.89%
China Automotive Systems	5.59%	10.58%	5.07%

Serve Robotics presently has a consensus price target of $17.51, suggesting a potential upside of 244.09%. Given Serve Robotics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Serve Robotics is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Serve Robotics	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
China Automotive Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.0% of Serve Robotics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Serve Robotics. Serve Robotics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Serve Robotics	$5.20M	75.81	-$101.36M	-$2.01	N/A
China Automotive Systems	$765.74M	0.17	$42.84M	$1.42	3.09

Serve Robotics has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Serve Robotics had 1 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Serve Robotics and 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems. Serve Robotics' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 0.82 indicating that Serve Robotics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Serve Robotics	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
China Automotive Systems	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Serve Robotics on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Strattec Security?

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Strattec Security (NASDAQ:STRT) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Strattec Security's net margin of 4.31%. Strattec Security's return on equity of 11.00% beat China Automotive Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
China Automotive Systems	5.59%	10.58%	5.07%
Strattec Security	4.31%	11.00%	7.22%

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strattec Security has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.9% of Strattec Security shares are owned by institutional investors. 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Strattec Security shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Strattec Security. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Strattec Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems	$765.74M	0.17	$42.84M	$1.42	3.09
Strattec Security	$579.58M	0.59	$18.68M	$6.06	13.59

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
China Automotive Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Strattec Security	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Strattec Security had 1 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Strattec Security and 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems. Strattec Security's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 0.82 indicating that Strattec Security is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
China Automotive Systems	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Strattec Security	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Strattec Security beats China Automotive Systems on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Holley?

Holley (NYSE:HLLY) and China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Holley. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Holley, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Holley	$613.51M	0.52	$19.17M	$0.19	13.82
China Automotive Systems	$765.74M	0.17	$42.84M	$1.42	3.09

In the previous week, Holley had 1 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Holley and 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Holley's score of 0.20 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Holley	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
China Automotive Systems	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

39.7% of Holley shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 4.9% of Holley shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Holley currently has a consensus target price of $4.90, suggesting a potential upside of 86.60%. Given Holley's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Holley is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Holley	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
China Automotive Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Holley has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Holley's net margin of 3.89%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Holley's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Holley	3.89%	5.46%	2.09%
China Automotive Systems	5.59%	10.58%	5.07%

Summary

Holley beats China Automotive Systems on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Motorcar Parts of America?

Motorcar Parts of America (NASDAQ:MPAA) and China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

83.5% of Motorcar Parts of America shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of Motorcar Parts of America shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Motorcar Parts of America's net margin of 1.57%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Motorcar Parts of America	1.57%	5.53%	1.45%
China Automotive Systems	5.59%	10.58%	5.07%

Motorcar Parts of America currently has a consensus price target of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 35.71%. Given Motorcar Parts of America's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Motorcar Parts of America is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Motorcar Parts of America	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
China Automotive Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

China Automotive Systems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Motorcar Parts of America. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Motorcar Parts of America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Motorcar Parts of America	$789.81M	0.34	$12.39M	$0.55	25.45
China Automotive Systems	$765.74M	0.17	$42.84M	$1.42	3.09

In the previous week, Motorcar Parts of America and Motorcar Parts of America both had 1 articles in the media. Motorcar Parts of America's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 0.82 indicating that Motorcar Parts of America is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Motorcar Parts of America	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
China Automotive Systems	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Motorcar Parts of America beats China Automotive Systems on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get China Automotive Systems News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CAAS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CAAS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	China Automotive Systems	AUTO/TRUCK Industry	Auto Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$131.54M	$6.07B	$21.59B	$12.44B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.09%	2.54%	8.84%
P/E Ratio	3.09	21.50	18.51	23.91
Price / Sales	0.17	21.53	14.60	90.57
Price / Cash	2.62	11.30	11.73	60.07
Price / Book	0.34	4.07	2.99	6.18
Net Income	$42.84M	$183.89M	$335.31M	$331.95M
7 Day Performance	0.92%	-2.61%	-1.78%	-2.05%
1 Month Performance	-1.57%	-6.34%	-4.87%	-2.14%
1 Year Performance	4.03%	-3.79%	-8.93%	17.28%

China Automotive Systems Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CAAS China Automotive Systems	1.6965 of 5 stars	$4.39 +0.7%	N/A	+3.1%	$131.54M	$765.74M	3.09	4,370
CPS Cooper-Standard	2.7595 of 5 stars	$27.71 +1.4%	$49.33 +78.0%	+17.1%	$492.70M	$88.28B	N/A	22,000	Gap Down
SERV Serve Robotics	2.9105 of 5 stars	$5.92 -2.0%	$17.51 +195.8%	-57.9%	$458.05M	$5.20M	N/A	67	Gap Down
STRT Strattec Security	3.3053 of 5 stars	$78.28 +0.7%	N/A	+34.0%	$327.12M	$579.58M	12.92	2,848	News Coverage Positive News
HLLY Holley	4.4721 of 5 stars	$2.53 +1.0%	$4.90 +94.1%	+17.5%	$306.09M	$613.51M	13.29	1,483	News Coverage

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CAAS) was last updated on 7/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

China Automotive Systems (CAAS) Competitors

CAAS vs. CPS, SERV, STRT, HLLY, and MPAA

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Cooper-Standard?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Serve Robotics?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Strattec Security?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Holley?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Motorcar Parts of America?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CAAS vs. The Competition

China Automotive Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

China Automotive Systems (CAAS) Competitors

CAAS vs. CPS, SERV, STRT, HLLY, and MPAA

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Cooper-Standard?

Do analysts prefer CPS or CAAS?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CPS or CAAS?

Which has more risk & volatility, CPS or CAAS?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of CPS or CAAS?

Is CPS or CAAS more profitable?

Does the media refer more to CPS or CAAS?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Serve Robotics?

Is SERV or CAAS more profitable?

Do analysts rate SERV or CAAS?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of SERV or CAAS?

Which has better earnings & valuation, SERV or CAAS?

Which has more volatility & risk, SERV or CAAS?

Does the media refer more to SERV or CAAS?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Strattec Security?

Is CAAS or STRT more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, CAAS or STRT?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of CAAS or STRT?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CAAS or STRT?

Do analysts rate CAAS or STRT?

Does the media prefer CAAS or STRT?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Holley?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, HLLY or CAAS?

Does the media favor HLLY or CAAS?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of HLLY or CAAS?

Do analysts rate HLLY or CAAS?

Which has more risk and volatility, HLLY or CAAS?

Is HLLY or CAAS more profitable?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Motorcar Parts of America?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of MPAA or CAAS?

Is MPAA or CAAS more profitable?

Do analysts recommend MPAA or CAAS?

Which has more risk and volatility, MPAA or CAAS?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MPAA or CAAS?

Does the media favor MPAA or CAAS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CAAS vs. The Competition

China Automotive Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools