Free Trial
Final Hours! Save $100 on MarketBeat All Access Before 11:59 PM
  • 0Days
  • 0Hours
  • 0Minutes
  • 0Seconds
Lock In $149 Tonight
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

China Automotive Systems (CAAS) Competitors

China Automotive Systems logo
$4.63 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 05/22/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$4.64 +0.00 (+0.11%)
As of 05/22/2026 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CAAS vs. CPS, HLLY, STRT, NIU, and MPAA

Should you buy China Automotive Systems stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares China Automotive Systems with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with China Automotive Systems include Cooper-Standard (CPS), Holley (HLLY), Strattec Security (STRT), Niu Technologies (NIU), and Motorcar Parts of America (MPAA). These companies are all part of the "automobiles and trucks" industry.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Cooper-Standard?

Cooper-Standard (NYSE:CPS) and China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Cooper-Standard has a beta of 2, indicating that its stock price is 100% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cooper-Standard and Cooper-Standard both had 1 articles in the media. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Cooper-Standard's score of 0.00 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cooper-Standard
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
China Automotive Systems
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Cooper-Standard's net margin of -1.41%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Cooper-Standard's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cooper-Standard-1.41% N/A -2.15%
China Automotive Systems 5.59%10.58%5.07%

China Automotive Systems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cooper-Standard. Cooper-Standard is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cooper-Standard$2.74B0.18-$4.16M-$2.18N/A
China Automotive Systems$765.74M0.18$42.84M$1.423.26

Cooper-Standard presently has a consensus price target of $49.33, indicating a potential upside of 73.00%. Given Cooper-Standard's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Cooper-Standard is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cooper-Standard
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

69.1% of Cooper-Standard shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 9.2% of Cooper-Standard shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Cooper-Standard on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Holley?

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Holley (NYSE:HLLY) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and dividends.

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Holley. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Holley, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems$765.74M0.18$42.84M$1.423.26
Holley$613.51M0.50$19.17M$0.1913.34

In the previous week, China Automotive Systems had 1 more articles in the media than Holley. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems and 0 mentions for Holley. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Holley's score of 0.00 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
China Automotive Systems Positive
Holley Neutral

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Holley's net margin of 3.89%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Holley's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Automotive Systems5.59% 10.58% 5.07%
Holley 3.89%5.46%2.09%

Holley has a consensus price target of $4.90, suggesting a potential upside of 93.29%. Given Holley's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Holley is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Holley
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.7% of Holley shares are held by institutional investors. 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of Holley shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Holley has a beta of 1.4, meaning that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Holley on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Strattec Security?

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Strattec Security (NASDAQ:STRT) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and risk.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Strattec Security's net margin of 4.31%. Strattec Security's return on equity of 11.00% beat China Automotive Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Automotive Systems5.59% 10.58% 5.07%
Strattec Security 4.31%11.00%7.22%

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strattec Security has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Strattec Security. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Strattec Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems$765.74M0.18$42.84M$1.423.26
Strattec Security$565.07M0.54$18.68M$6.0611.95

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Strattec Security
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, China Automotive Systems and China Automotive Systems both had 1 articles in the media. Strattec Security's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 0.53 indicating that Strattec Security is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
China Automotive Systems
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Strattec Security
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.9% of Strattec Security shares are held by institutional investors. 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Strattec Security shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Strattec Security beats China Automotive Systems on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Niu Technologies?

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Niu Technologies (NASDAQ:NIU) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Niu Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Niu Technologies and 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Niu Technologies' score of -0.14 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
China Automotive Systems
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Niu Technologies
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Niu Technologies. Niu Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems$765.74M0.18$42.84M$1.423.26
Niu Technologies$616.02M0.30-$5.63M-$0.18N/A

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Niu Technologies' net margin of -2.17%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Niu Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Automotive Systems5.59% 10.58% 5.07%
Niu Technologies -2.17%-10.85%-3.12%

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Niu Technologies has a beta of -0.07, indicating that its share price is 107% less volatile than the broader market.

Niu Technologies has a consensus price target of $3.50, indicating a potential upside of 45.83%. Given Niu Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Niu Technologies is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Niu Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.1% of Niu Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.2% of Niu Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Niu Technologies on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Motorcar Parts of America?

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Motorcar Parts of America (NASDAQ:MPAA) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, China Automotive Systems had 1 more articles in the media than Motorcar Parts of America. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems and 0 mentions for Motorcar Parts of America. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Motorcar Parts of America's score of 0.00 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
China Automotive Systems Positive
Motorcar Parts of America Neutral

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Motorcar Parts of America. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Motorcar Parts of America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems$765.74M0.18$42.84M$1.423.26
Motorcar Parts of America$757.35M0.28-$19.47M$0.09121.22

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Motorcar Parts of America's net margin of 0.25%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Automotive Systems5.59% 10.58% 5.07%
Motorcar Parts of America 0.25%3.68%0.97%

Motorcar Parts of America has a consensus target price of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 74.15%. Given Motorcar Parts of America's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Motorcar Parts of America is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Motorcar Parts of America
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.5% of Motorcar Parts of America shares are held by institutional investors. 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Motorcar Parts of America shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Motorcar Parts of America on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get China Automotive Systems News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CAAS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CAAS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CAAS vs. The Competition

MetricChina Automotive SystemsAUTO/TRUCK IndustryAuto SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$139.69M$5.92B$22.38B$12.34B
Dividend YieldN/A2.13%2.61%5.28%
P/E Ratio3.2622.3021.6625.65
Price / Sales0.1824.9019.1386.28
Price / Cash2.7811.3511.7556.67
Price / Book0.363.002.587.14
Net Income$42.84M$184.20M$333.18M$335.98M
7 Day Performance-1.70%3.09%2.62%3.56%
1 Month Performance3.58%-2.41%0.20%2.54%
1 Year Performance14.89%19.85%5.08%35.05%

China Automotive Systems Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CAAS
China Automotive Systems
1.4995 of 5 stars
$4.63
flat
N/A+14.9%$139.69M$765.74M3.264,370
CPS
Cooper-Standard
4.0319 of 5 stars
$26.87
-6.6%
$49.33
+83.6%
+29.8%$476.90M$88.28BN/A22,000
HLLY
Holley
4.5647 of 5 stars
$2.66
-2.4%
$4.90
+84.6%
+27.7%$320.66M$613.51M13.971,483
STRT
Strattec Security
2.8087 of 5 stars
$66.91
+3.9%
N/A+39.7%$279.60M$579.58M11.042,848
NIU
Niu Technologies
2.3889 of 5 stars
$2.84
+0.4%
$3.50
+23.2%
-40.7%$222.17M$4.31BN/A700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CAAS) was last updated on 5/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners