Do analysts rate CPS or CAAS?

Cooper-Standard currently has a consensus target price of $48.33, suggesting a potential upside of 78.58%. Given Cooper-Standard's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cooper-Standard is more favorable than China Automotive Systems. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Cooper-Standard 2 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.75 China Automotive Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media refer more to CPS or CAAS?

In the previous week, Cooper-Standard had 4 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Cooper-Standard and 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems. Cooper-Standard's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 0.37 indicating that Cooper-Standard is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cooper-Standard 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive China Automotive Systems 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate ECX or CAAS?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score ECARX 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 China Automotive Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media refer more to ECX or CAAS?

In the previous week, ECARX and ECARX both had 1 articles in the media. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat ECARX's score of 0.00 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ECARX 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral China Automotive Systems 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer HLLY or CAAS?

Holley currently has a consensus target price of $4.90, suggesting a potential upside of 60.66%. Given Holley's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Holley is more favorable than China Automotive Systems. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Holley 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.57 China Automotive Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media refer more to HLLY or CAAS?

In the previous week, Holley had 1 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Holley and 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems. Holley's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 0.37 indicating that Holley is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Holley 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive China Automotive Systems 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend CAAS or STRT?

Strattec Security has a consensus target price of $83.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.44%. Given Strattec Security's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Strattec Security is more favorable than China Automotive Systems. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score China Automotive Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Strattec Security 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75

Does the media prefer CAAS or STRT?

In the previous week, Strattec Security had 13 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Strattec Security and 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems. Strattec Security's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 0.37 indicating that Strattec Security is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment China Automotive Systems 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Strattec Security 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate MPAA or CAAS?

Motorcar Parts of America presently has a consensus price target of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 49.01%. Given Motorcar Parts of America's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Motorcar Parts of America is more favorable than China Automotive Systems. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Motorcar Parts of America 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25 China Automotive Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Does the media refer more to MPAA or CAAS?

In the previous week, Motorcar Parts of America had 1 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Motorcar Parts of America and 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems. Motorcar Parts of America's average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 0.37 indicating that Motorcar Parts of America is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Motorcar Parts of America 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive China Automotive Systems 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

China Automotive Systems (CAAS) Competitors

$5.40 -0.04 (-0.74%)

As of 09/4/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

CAAS vs. CPS, ECX, HLLY, STRT, and MPAA

Should you buy China Automotive Systems stock or one of its competitors? China Automotive Systems's main competitors and comparable companies include Cooper-Standard (CPS), ECARX (ECX), Holley (HLLY), Strattec Security (STRT), and Motorcar Parts of America (MPAA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "automotive parts & equipment" industry.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Cooper-Standard?

Cooper-Standard (NYSE:CPS) and China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Cooper-Standard has a beta of 2.01, indicating that its share price is 101% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

69.1% of Cooper-Standard shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 9.2% of Cooper-Standard shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cooper-Standard currently has a consensus target price of $48.33, suggesting a potential upside of 78.58%. Given Cooper-Standard's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cooper-Standard is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cooper-Standard	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.75
China Automotive Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Cooper-Standard had 4 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Cooper-Standard and 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems. Cooper-Standard's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 0.37 indicating that Cooper-Standard is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cooper-Standard	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
China Automotive Systems	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Cooper-Standard's net margin of -2.03%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Cooper-Standard's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cooper-Standard	-2.03%	N/A	-2.31%
China Automotive Systems	5.59%	10.58%	5.07%

China Automotive Systems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cooper-Standard. Cooper-Standard is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cooper-Standard	$91.38B	0.01	-$4.16M	-$3.14	N/A
China Automotive Systems	$765.74M	0.21	$42.84M	$1.42	3.80

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Cooper-Standard on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to ECARX?

ECARX (NASDAQ:ECX) and China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

ECARX has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 20.0% of ECARX shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ECARX and ECARX both had 1 articles in the media. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat ECARX's score of 0.00 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ECARX	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
China Automotive Systems	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to ECARX's net margin of -2.25%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat ECARX's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ECARX	-2.25%	N/A	-2.75%
China Automotive Systems	5.59%	10.58%	5.07%

China Automotive Systems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than ECARX. ECARX is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ECARX	$847.90M	0.44	-$66.04M	-$0.05	N/A
China Automotive Systems	$765.74M	0.21	$42.84M	$1.42	3.80

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ECARX	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
China Automotive Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats ECARX on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Holley?

Holley (NYSE:HLLY) and China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Holley has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

39.7% of Holley shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of Holley shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Holley currently has a consensus target price of $4.90, suggesting a potential upside of 60.66%. Given Holley's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Holley is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Holley	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
China Automotive Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, Holley had 1 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Holley and 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems. Holley's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 0.37 indicating that Holley is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Holley	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
China Automotive Systems	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Holley. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Holley, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Holley	$613.51M	0.60	$19.17M	$0.08	38.13
China Automotive Systems	$765.74M	0.21	$42.84M	$1.42	3.80

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Holley's net margin of 1.68%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Holley's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Holley	1.68%	8.41%	3.23%
China Automotive Systems	5.59%	10.58%	5.07%

Summary

Holley beats China Automotive Systems on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Strattec Security?

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Strattec Security (NASDAQ:STRT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and profitability.

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strattec Security has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Strattec Security had 13 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Strattec Security and 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems. Strattec Security's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 0.37 indicating that Strattec Security is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
China Automotive Systems	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Strattec Security	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Strattec Security. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Strattec Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems	$765.74M	0.21	$42.84M	$1.42	3.80
Strattec Security	$579.39M	0.52	$20.60M	$5.00	15.17

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Strattec Security's net margin of 3.56%. Strattec Security's return on equity of 10.79% beat China Automotive Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
China Automotive Systems	5.59%	10.58%	5.07%
Strattec Security	3.56%	10.79%	7.23%

Strattec Security has a consensus target price of $83.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.44%. Given Strattec Security's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Strattec Security is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
China Automotive Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Strattec Security	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.9% of Strattec Security shares are held by institutional investors. 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of Strattec Security shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Strattec Security beats China Automotive Systems on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Motorcar Parts of America?

Motorcar Parts of America (NASDAQ:MPAA) and China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

China Automotive Systems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Motorcar Parts of America. Motorcar Parts of America is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Motorcar Parts of America	$789.81M	0.29	$12.39M	-$0.31	N/A
China Automotive Systems	$765.74M	0.21	$42.84M	$1.42	3.80

In the previous week, Motorcar Parts of America had 1 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Motorcar Parts of America and 1 mentions for China Automotive Systems. Motorcar Parts of America's average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 0.37 indicating that Motorcar Parts of America is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Motorcar Parts of America	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
China Automotive Systems	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

83.5% of Motorcar Parts of America shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.4% of Motorcar Parts of America shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Motorcar Parts of America's net margin of -0.53%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Motorcar Parts of America	-0.53%	-0.57%	-0.15%
China Automotive Systems	5.59%	10.58%	5.07%

Motorcar Parts of America presently has a consensus price target of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 49.01%. Given Motorcar Parts of America's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Motorcar Parts of America is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Motorcar Parts of America	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
China Automotive Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Motorcar Parts of America and China Automotive Systems tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get China Automotive Systems News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CAAS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CAAS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	China Automotive Systems	Automobile Components Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$164.13M	$5.09B	$13.01B	$12.92B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.27%	50.94%	8.90%
P/E Ratio	3.80	11.13	46.24	25.42
Price / Sales	0.21	24.50	88.17	89.63
Price / Cash	3.27	10.97	28.90	52.28
Price / Book	0.42	1.83	5.82	6.17
Net Income	$42.84M	$72.31M	$445.07M	$349.50M
7 Day Performance	8.22%	1.37%	-0.60%	-0.15%
1 Month Performance	24.14%	0.37%	-2.00%	1.02%
1 Year Performance	21.62%	5.77%	-3.45%	14.50%

China Automotive Systems Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CAAS China Automotive Systems	1.6542 of 5 stars	$5.40 -0.7%	N/A	+21.1%	$164.13M	$765.74M	3.80	4,370
CPS Cooper-Standard	3.7191 of 5 stars	$26.80 +1.5%	$48.33 +80.3%	-30.6%	$473.37M	$91.38B	N/A	22,000
ECX ECARX	0.5929 of 5 stars	$1.05 -1.9%	N/A	-31.4%	$374.29M	$847.90M	N/A	1,432	Positive News
HLLY Holley	3.7893 of 5 stars	$2.92 -1.7%	$4.90 +67.8%	-23.1%	$354.00M	$613.15M	36.50	1,483	Positive News
STRT Strattec Security	4.0358 of 5 stars	$75.04 +6.8%	N/A	+11.2%	$313.58M	$579.39M	15.01	2,848

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CAAS) was last updated on 9/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

China Automotive Systems (CAAS) Competitors

CAAS vs. CPS, ECX, HLLY, STRT, and MPAA

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Cooper-Standard?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to ECARX?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Holley?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Strattec Security?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Motorcar Parts of America?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CAAS vs. The Competition

China Automotive Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

China Automotive Systems (CAAS) Competitors

CAAS vs. CPS, ECX, HLLY, STRT, and MPAA

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Cooper-Standard?

Which has more volatility and risk, CPS or CAAS?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of CPS or CAAS?

Do analysts rate CPS or CAAS?

Does the media refer more to CPS or CAAS?

Is CPS or CAAS more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CPS or CAAS?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to ECARX?

Which has more risk & volatility, ECX or CAAS?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of ECX or CAAS?

Does the media refer more to ECX or CAAS?

Is ECX or CAAS more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, ECX or CAAS?

Do analysts rate ECX or CAAS?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Holley?

Which has more risk and volatility, HLLY or CAAS?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of HLLY or CAAS?

Do analysts prefer HLLY or CAAS?

Does the media refer more to HLLY or CAAS?

Which has better valuation and earnings, HLLY or CAAS?

Is HLLY or CAAS more profitable?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Strattec Security?

Which has more volatility and risk, CAAS or STRT?

Does the media prefer CAAS or STRT?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, CAAS or STRT?

Is CAAS or STRT more profitable?

Do analysts recommend CAAS or STRT?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of CAAS or STRT?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Motorcar Parts of America?

Which has more volatility & risk, MPAA or CAAS?

Which has better earnings and valuation, MPAA or CAAS?

Does the media refer more to MPAA or CAAS?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MPAA or CAAS?

Is MPAA or CAAS more profitable?

Do analysts rate MPAA or CAAS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CAAS vs. The Competition

China Automotive Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools