Do analysts prefer CAAS or CPS?

Cooper-Standard has a consensus target price of $49.33, indicating a potential upside of 67.10%. Given Cooper-Standard's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cooper-Standard is more favorable than China Automotive Systems. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score China Automotive Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Cooper-Standard 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Do analysts rate STRT or CAAS?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Strattec Security 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 China Automotive Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media refer more to STRT or CAAS?

In the previous week, Strattec Security and Strattec Security both had 2 articles in the media. Strattec Security's average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 0.93 indicating that Strattec Security is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Strattec Security 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive China Automotive Systems 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate HLLY or CAAS?

Holley presently has a consensus price target of $4.90, suggesting a potential upside of 91.78%. Given Holley's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Holley is more favorable than China Automotive Systems. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Holley 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 China Automotive Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Do analysts prefer CAAS or MPAA?

Motorcar Parts of America has a consensus target price of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.91%. Given Motorcar Parts of America's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Motorcar Parts of America is more favorable than China Automotive Systems. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score China Automotive Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Motorcar Parts of America 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Does the media prefer CAAS or MPAA?

In the previous week, Motorcar Parts of America had 9 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Motorcar Parts of America and 2 mentions for China Automotive Systems. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Motorcar Parts of America's score of 0.60 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment China Automotive Systems 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Motorcar Parts of America 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer NIU or CAAS?

Niu Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $3.50, suggesting a potential upside of 52.17%. Given Niu Technologies' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Niu Technologies is more favorable than China Automotive Systems. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Niu Technologies 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 China Automotive Systems 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media refer more to NIU or CAAS?

In the previous week, Niu Technologies and Niu Technologies both had 2 articles in the media. Niu Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 0.93 indicating that Niu Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Niu Technologies 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive China Automotive Systems 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

China Automotive Systems (CAAS) Competitors

$4.62 0.00 (0.00%)

Closing price 06/12/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$4.56 -0.06 (-1.28%)

As of 06/12/2026 07:57 PM Eastern

Compare

CAAS vs. CPS, STRT, HLLY, MPAA, and NIU

Should you buy China Automotive Systems stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares China Automotive Systems with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with China Automotive Systems include Cooper-Standard (CPS), Strattec Security (STRT), Holley (HLLY), Motorcar Parts of America (MPAA), and Niu Technologies (NIU). These companies are all part of the "automobiles and trucks" industry.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Cooper-Standard?

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Cooper-Standard (NYSE:CPS) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation and analyst recommendations.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Cooper-Standard's net margin of -1.41%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Cooper-Standard's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
China Automotive Systems	5.59%	10.58%	5.07%
Cooper-Standard	-1.41%	N/A	-2.15%

China Automotive Systems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cooper-Standard. Cooper-Standard is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems	$765.74M	0.18	$42.84M	$1.42	3.25
Cooper-Standard	$2.74B	0.19	-$4.16M	-$2.18	N/A

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.1% of Cooper-Standard shares are owned by institutional investors. 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.2% of Cooper-Standard shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cooper-Standard has a beta of 1.97, meaning that its stock price is 97% more volatile than the broader market.

Cooper-Standard has a consensus target price of $49.33, indicating a potential upside of 67.10%. Given Cooper-Standard's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cooper-Standard is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
China Automotive Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Cooper-Standard	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, China Automotive Systems had 2 more articles in the media than Cooper-Standard. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for China Automotive Systems and 0 mentions for Cooper-Standard. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Cooper-Standard's score of 0.00 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
China Automotive Systems	Positive
Cooper-Standard	Neutral

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Cooper-Standard on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Strattec Security?

Strattec Security (NASDAQ:STRT) and China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Strattec Security. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Strattec Security, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Strattec Security	$565.07M	0.59	$18.68M	$6.06	13.12
China Automotive Systems	$765.74M	0.18	$42.84M	$1.42	3.25

In the previous week, Strattec Security and Strattec Security both had 2 articles in the media. Strattec Security's average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 0.93 indicating that Strattec Security is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Strattec Security	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
China Automotive Systems	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

68.9% of Strattec Security shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of Strattec Security shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Strattec Security has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Strattec Security's net margin of 4.31%. Strattec Security's return on equity of 11.00% beat China Automotive Systems' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Strattec Security	4.31%	11.00%	7.22%
China Automotive Systems	5.59%	10.58%	5.07%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Strattec Security	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
China Automotive Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Strattec Security beats China Automotive Systems on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Holley?

Holley (NYSE:HLLY) and China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Holley. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Holley, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Holley	$613.51M	0.51	$19.17M	$0.19	13.45
China Automotive Systems	$765.74M	0.18	$42.84M	$1.42	3.25

Holley has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, China Automotive Systems had 2 more articles in the media than Holley. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for China Automotive Systems and 0 mentions for Holley. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Holley's score of 0.00 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Holley	Neutral
China Automotive Systems	Positive

Holley presently has a consensus price target of $4.90, suggesting a potential upside of 91.78%. Given Holley's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Holley is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Holley	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
China Automotive Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Holley's net margin of 3.89%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Holley's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Holley	3.89%	5.46%	2.09%
China Automotive Systems	5.59%	10.58%	5.07%

39.7% of Holley shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 4.9% of Holley shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Holley on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Motorcar Parts of America?

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Motorcar Parts of America (NASDAQ:MPAA) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Motorcar Parts of America has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Motorcar Parts of America's net margin of 1.57%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Motorcar Parts of America's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
China Automotive Systems	5.59%	10.58%	5.07%
Motorcar Parts of America	1.57%	5.53%	1.45%

China Automotive Systems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Motorcar Parts of America. China Automotive Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Motorcar Parts of America, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems	$765.74M	0.18	$42.84M	$1.42	3.25
Motorcar Parts of America	$789.81M	0.36	$12.39M	$0.55	27.44

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.5% of Motorcar Parts of America shares are owned by institutional investors. 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Motorcar Parts of America shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Motorcar Parts of America has a consensus target price of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.91%. Given Motorcar Parts of America's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Motorcar Parts of America is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
China Automotive Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Motorcar Parts of America	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

In the previous week, Motorcar Parts of America had 9 more articles in the media than China Automotive Systems. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Motorcar Parts of America and 2 mentions for China Automotive Systems. China Automotive Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Motorcar Parts of America's score of 0.60 indicating that China Automotive Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
China Automotive Systems	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Motorcar Parts of America	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Motorcar Parts of America beats China Automotive Systems on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Niu Technologies?

Niu Technologies (NASDAQ:NIU) and China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) are both small-cap auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Niu Technologies has a beta of -0.15, meaning that its stock price is 115% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Niu Technologies. Niu Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Niu Technologies	$616.02M	0.29	-$5.63M	-$0.18	N/A
China Automotive Systems	$765.74M	0.18	$42.84M	$1.42	3.25

75.1% of Niu Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 10.2% of Niu Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Niu Technologies' net margin of -2.17%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Niu Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Niu Technologies	-2.17%	-10.85%	-3.12%
China Automotive Systems	5.59%	10.58%	5.07%

Niu Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $3.50, suggesting a potential upside of 52.17%. Given Niu Technologies' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Niu Technologies is more favorable than China Automotive Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Niu Technologies	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
China Automotive Systems	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Niu Technologies and Niu Technologies both had 2 articles in the media. Niu Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 0.93 indicating that Niu Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Niu Technologies	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
China Automotive Systems	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Niu Technologies on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get China Automotive Systems News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CAAS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CAAS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	China Automotive Systems	AUTO/TRUCK Industry	Auto Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$139.39M	$6.06B	$21.73B	$12.05B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.13%	2.48%	5.66%
P/E Ratio	3.25	22.61	19.43	24.42
Price / Sales	0.18	24.07	18.02	118.72
Price / Cash	2.78	11.61	11.94	37.92
Price / Book	0.36	4.98	3.45	6.82
Net Income	$42.84M	$182.59M	$335.50M	$337.56M
7 Day Performance	4.05%	0.28%	0.75%	1.16%
1 Month Performance	-2.33%	4.21%	2.35%	3.16%
1 Year Performance	6.94%	15.27%	3.98%	30.60%

China Automotive Systems Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CAAS China Automotive Systems	1.5282 of 5 stars	$4.62 flat	N/A	+6.9%	$139.39M	$765.74M	3.25	4,370	Gap Down High Trading Volume
CPS Cooper-Standard	2.5117 of 5 stars	$29.31 -5.1%	$49.33 +68.3%	+35.6%	$520.58M	$2.74B	N/A	22,000
STRT Strattec Security	2.9631 of 5 stars	$77.31 -3.0%	N/A	+37.1%	$323.06M	$565.07M	12.76	2,848	Positive News
HLLY Holley	4.416 of 5 stars	$2.57 -2.1%	$4.90 +91.0%	+23.7%	$312.16M	$613.51M	13.50	1,483
MPAA Motorcar Parts of America	4.0685 of 5 stars	$10.59 -0.7%	$19.00 +79.4%	+40.9%	$203.44M	$757.35M	117.67	5,700	Earnings Report Analyst Upgrade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:CAAS) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

China Automotive Systems (CAAS) Competitors

CAAS vs. CPS, STRT, HLLY, MPAA, and NIU

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Cooper-Standard?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Strattec Security?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Holley?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Motorcar Parts of America?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Niu Technologies?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CAAS vs. The Competition

China Automotive Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

China Automotive Systems (CAAS) Competitors

CAAS vs. CPS, STRT, HLLY, MPAA, and NIU

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Cooper-Standard?

Is CAAS or CPS more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CAAS or CPS?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in CAAS or CPS?

Which has more volatility and risk, CAAS or CPS?

Do analysts prefer CAAS or CPS?

Does the media prefer CAAS or CPS?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Strattec Security?

Which has better earnings & valuation, STRT or CAAS?

Does the media refer more to STRT or CAAS?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in STRT or CAAS?

Which has more risk and volatility, STRT or CAAS?

Is STRT or CAAS more profitable?

Do analysts rate STRT or CAAS?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Holley?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, HLLY or CAAS?

Which has more volatility and risk, HLLY or CAAS?

Does the media refer more to HLLY or CAAS?

Do analysts rate HLLY or CAAS?

Is HLLY or CAAS more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in HLLY or CAAS?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Motorcar Parts of America?

Which has more risk and volatility, CAAS or MPAA?

Is CAAS or MPAA more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, CAAS or MPAA?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of CAAS or MPAA?

Do analysts prefer CAAS or MPAA?

Does the media prefer CAAS or MPAA?

Summary

How does China Automotive Systems compare to Niu Technologies?

Which has more risk & volatility, NIU or CAAS?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, NIU or CAAS?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in NIU or CAAS?

Is NIU or CAAS more profitable?

Do analysts prefer NIU or CAAS?

Does the media refer more to NIU or CAAS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CAAS vs. The Competition

China Automotive Systems Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools