Go Pro

PMGC (ELAB) Competitors

PMGC logo
$1.14 +0.02 (+1.34%)
As of 11:20 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

ELAB vs. BGMS, CELZ, CUPR, ALZN, and FBLG

Should you buy PMGC stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares PMGC with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with PMGC include Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals (BGMS), Creative Medical Technology (CELZ), Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) (CUPR), Alzamend Neuro (ALZN), and FibroBiologics (FBLG). These companies are all part of the "pharmaceutical products" industry.

How does PMGC compare to Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals?

PMGC (NASDAQ:ELAB) and Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:BGMS) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, PMGC had 4 more articles in the media than Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for PMGC and 2 mentions for Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals. Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals' average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat PMGC's score of 0.48 indicating that Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PMGC Neutral
Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals Positive

22.2% of PMGC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.6% of Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of PMGC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.8% of Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PMGC
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

PMGC has a beta of -0.23, indicating that its stock price is 123% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals has a beta of -0.38, indicating that its stock price is 138% less volatile than the broader market.

Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals' return on equity of -51.21% beat PMGC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PMGCN/A -117.82% -70.79%
Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals N/A -51.21%-44.00%

Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals has higher revenue and earnings than PMGC. Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PMGC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PMGC$590K2.23-$7.75M-$168.62N/A
Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals$750K6.58-$3M-$4.54N/A

Summary

Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals beats PMGC on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PMGC compare to Creative Medical Technology?

Creative Medical Technology (NASDAQ:CELZ) and PMGC (NASDAQ:ELAB) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, PMGC had 4 more articles in the media than Creative Medical Technology. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for PMGC and 2 mentions for Creative Medical Technology. PMGC's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Creative Medical Technology's score of 0.46 indicating that PMGC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Creative Medical Technology Neutral
PMGC Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Creative Medical Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
PMGC
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Creative Medical Technology has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PMGC. Creative Medical Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PMGC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Creative Medical Technology$3K1,321.44-$5.99M-$2.14N/A
PMGC$590K2.23-$7.75M-$168.62N/A

1.4% of Creative Medical Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.2% of PMGC shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Creative Medical Technology shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of PMGC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Creative Medical Technology's return on equity of -88.38% beat PMGC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Creative Medical TechnologyN/A -88.38% -84.71%
PMGC N/A -117.82%-70.79%

Creative Medical Technology has a beta of 1.89, indicating that its stock price is 89% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PMGC has a beta of -0.23, indicating that its stock price is 123% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Creative Medical Technology beats PMGC on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PMGC compare to Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)?

Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) (NASDAQ:CUPR) and PMGC (NASDAQ:ELAB) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

In the previous week, PMGC had 4 more articles in the media than Cuprina Holdings (Cayman). MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for PMGC and 2 mentions for Cuprina Holdings (Cayman). Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)'s average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat PMGC's score of 0.48 indicating that Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) Positive
PMGC Neutral

Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat PMGC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)N/A N/A N/A
PMGC N/A -117.82%-70.79%

22.2% of PMGC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of PMGC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
PMGC
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PMGC.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)$40K94.76-$3.63MN/AN/A
PMGC$590K2.23-$7.75M-$168.62N/A

Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) has a beta of -1.1, indicating that its share price is 210% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PMGC has a beta of -0.23, indicating that its share price is 123% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) and PMGC tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PMGC compare to Alzamend Neuro?

Alzamend Neuro (NASDAQ:ALZN) and PMGC (NASDAQ:ELAB) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, PMGC had 5 more articles in the media than Alzamend Neuro. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for PMGC and 1 mentions for Alzamend Neuro. Alzamend Neuro's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat PMGC's score of 0.48 indicating that Alzamend Neuro is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Alzamend Neuro Very Positive
PMGC Neutral

PMGC's return on equity of -117.82% beat Alzamend Neuro's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Alzamend NeuroN/A -177.52% -140.41%
PMGC N/A -117.82%-70.79%

Alzamend Neuro presently has a consensus target price of $28.00, indicating a potential upside of 2,282.98%. Given Alzamend Neuro's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Alzamend Neuro is more favorable than PMGC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Alzamend Neuro
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
PMGC
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Alzamend Neuro has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PMGC. Alzamend Neuro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PMGC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Alzamend NeuroN/AN/A-$4.51M-$2.16N/A
PMGC$590K2.23-$7.75M-$168.62N/A

Alzamend Neuro has a beta of 0.14, suggesting that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PMGC has a beta of -0.23, suggesting that its stock price is 123% less volatile than the broader market.

49.6% of Alzamend Neuro shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.2% of PMGC shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Alzamend Neuro shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of PMGC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Alzamend Neuro beats PMGC on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PMGC compare to FibroBiologics?

PMGC (NASDAQ:ELAB) and FibroBiologics (NASDAQ:FBLG) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and profitability.

FibroBiologics has a consensus target price of $74.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8,405.75%. Given FibroBiologics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe FibroBiologics is more favorable than PMGC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PMGC
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
FibroBiologics
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

PMGC has a beta of -0.23, suggesting that its share price is 123% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FibroBiologics has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

PMGC's return on equity of -117.82% beat FibroBiologics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PMGCN/A -117.82% -70.79%
FibroBiologics N/A -767.07%-195.56%

22.2% of PMGC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of PMGC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.3% of FibroBiologics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

PMGC has higher revenue and earnings than FibroBiologics. FibroBiologics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PMGC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PMGC$590K2.23-$7.75M-$168.62N/A
FibroBiologicsN/AN/A-$18.65M-$6.93N/A

In the previous week, PMGC had 3 more articles in the media than FibroBiologics. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for PMGC and 3 mentions for FibroBiologics. FibroBiologics' average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat PMGC's score of 0.48 indicating that FibroBiologics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PMGC
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
FibroBiologics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

PMGC and FibroBiologics tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PMGC News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ELAB and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ELAB and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ELAB vs. The Competition

MetricPMGCDIVERSIFIED OPS IndustryMulti-Sector SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.32M$17.30B$16.31B$12.59B
Dividend YieldN/A4.71%4.39%8.42%
P/E Ratio-0.0129.7325.4924.43
Price / Sales2.234.704.0891.44
Price / CashN/A49.4747.2959.36
Price / Book0.014.403.966.33
Net Income-$7.75M$910.50M$921.41M$331.13M
7 Day Performance7.08%-2.46%-2.14%0.39%
1 Month Performance-22.26%-10.11%-8.80%-0.53%
1 Year Performance-99.41%5.72%4.37%20.45%

PMGC Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ELAB
PMGC
0.863 of 5 stars
$1.14
+1.3%
N/A-99.5%$1.32M$590KN/A18
BGMS
Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals
1.4222 of 5 stars
$0.87
-1.5%
N/AN/A$4.80M$750KN/A14
CELZ
Creative Medical Technology
0.5588 of 5 stars
$1.00
-8.3%
N/A-68.1%$4.74M$3KN/A5
CUPR
Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)
1.092 of 5 stars
$5.09
-11.3%
N/AN/A$4.68M$40KN/A14
ALZN
Alzamend Neuro
2.7863 of 5 stars
$1.15
+0.9%
$28.00
+2,334.8%
-61.7%$4.37MN/AN/A4

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:ELAB) was last updated on 7/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners