Go Pro

PMGC (ELAB) Competitors

PMGC logo
$1.12 -0.01 (-0.45%)
As of 01:32 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

ELAB vs. BGMS, CELZ, CUPR, ALZN, and FBLG

Should you buy PMGC stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares PMGC with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with PMGC include Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals (BGMS), Creative Medical Technology (CELZ), Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) (CUPR), Alzamend Neuro (ALZN), and FibroBiologics (FBLG). These companies are all part of the "pharmaceutical products" industry.

How does PMGC compare to Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals?

Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:BGMS) and PMGC (NASDAQ:ELAB) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation and profitability.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
PMGC
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

23.6% of Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.2% of PMGC shares are held by institutional investors. 23.8% of Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of PMGC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals' return on equity of -51.21% beat PMGC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cyclacel PharmaceuticalsN/A -51.21% -44.00%
PMGC N/A -117.82%-70.79%

Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals has a beta of -0.38, meaning that its share price is 138% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PMGC has a beta of -0.23, meaning that its share price is 123% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, PMGC had 4 more articles in the media than Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for PMGC and 2 mentions for Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals. Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals' average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat PMGC's score of 0.48 indicating that Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals Positive
PMGC Neutral

Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals has higher revenue and earnings than PMGC. Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PMGC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals$750K6.59-$3M-$4.54N/A
PMGC$590K2.19-$7.75M-$168.62N/A

Summary

Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals beats PMGC on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PMGC compare to Creative Medical Technology?

PMGC (NASDAQ:ELAB) and Creative Medical Technology (NASDAQ:CELZ) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, PMGC had 4 more articles in the media than Creative Medical Technology. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for PMGC and 2 mentions for Creative Medical Technology. PMGC's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Creative Medical Technology's score of 0.46 indicating that PMGC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PMGC Neutral
Creative Medical Technology Neutral

PMGC has a beta of -0.23, meaning that its share price is 123% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Creative Medical Technology has a beta of 1.89, meaning that its share price is 89% more volatile than the broader market.

22.2% of PMGC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.4% of Creative Medical Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of PMGC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Creative Medical Technology shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Creative Medical Technology has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PMGC. Creative Medical Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PMGC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PMGC$590K2.19-$7.75M-$168.62N/A
Creative Medical Technology$3K1,292.99-$5.99M-$2.14N/A

Creative Medical Technology's return on equity of -88.38% beat PMGC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PMGCN/A -117.82% -70.79%
Creative Medical Technology N/A -88.38%-84.71%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PMGC
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Creative Medical Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

Summary

Creative Medical Technology beats PMGC on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PMGC compare to Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)?

Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) (NASDAQ:CUPR) and PMGC (NASDAQ:ELAB) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) has a beta of -1.1, indicating that its stock price is 210% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PMGC has a beta of -0.23, indicating that its stock price is 123% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
PMGC
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)'s return on equity of 0.00% beat PMGC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)N/A N/A N/A
PMGC N/A -117.82%-70.79%

22.2% of PMGC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of PMGC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PMGC.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)$40K97.41-$3.63MN/AN/A
PMGC$590K2.19-$7.75M-$168.62N/A

In the previous week, PMGC had 4 more articles in the media than Cuprina Holdings (Cayman). MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for PMGC and 2 mentions for Cuprina Holdings (Cayman). Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)'s average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat PMGC's score of 0.48 indicating that Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) Positive
PMGC Neutral

Summary

Cuprina Holdings (Cayman) and PMGC tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PMGC compare to Alzamend Neuro?

PMGC (NASDAQ:ELAB) and Alzamend Neuro (NASDAQ:ALZN) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

PMGC's return on equity of -117.82% beat Alzamend Neuro's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PMGCN/A -117.82% -70.79%
Alzamend Neuro N/A -177.52%-140.41%

Alzamend Neuro has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PMGC. Alzamend Neuro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PMGC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PMGC$590K2.19-$7.75M-$168.62N/A
Alzamend NeuroN/AN/A-$4.51M-$2.16N/A

PMGC has a beta of -0.23, meaning that its stock price is 123% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alzamend Neuro has a beta of 0.14, meaning that its stock price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

22.2% of PMGC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.6% of Alzamend Neuro shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of PMGC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Alzamend Neuro shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, PMGC had 5 more articles in the media than Alzamend Neuro. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for PMGC and 1 mentions for Alzamend Neuro. Alzamend Neuro's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat PMGC's score of 0.48 indicating that Alzamend Neuro is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PMGC Neutral
Alzamend Neuro Very Positive

Alzamend Neuro has a consensus price target of $28.00, indicating a potential upside of 2,243.10%. Given Alzamend Neuro's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Alzamend Neuro is more favorable than PMGC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PMGC
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Alzamend Neuro
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Alzamend Neuro beats PMGC on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does PMGC compare to FibroBiologics?

FibroBiologics (NASDAQ:FBLG) and PMGC (NASDAQ:ELAB) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation, earnings and dividends.

PMGC has higher revenue and earnings than FibroBiologics. FibroBiologics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PMGC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FibroBiologicsN/AN/A-$18.65M-$6.93N/A
PMGC$590K2.19-$7.75M-$168.62N/A

FibroBiologics presently has a consensus price target of $74.00, indicating a potential upside of 8,425.35%. Given FibroBiologics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe FibroBiologics is more favorable than PMGC.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FibroBiologics
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
PMGC
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

PMGC's return on equity of -117.82% beat FibroBiologics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FibroBiologicsN/A -767.07% -195.56%
PMGC N/A -117.82%-70.79%

In the previous week, PMGC had 3 more articles in the media than FibroBiologics. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for PMGC and 3 mentions for FibroBiologics. FibroBiologics' average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat PMGC's score of 0.48 indicating that FibroBiologics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FibroBiologics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
PMGC
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

FibroBiologics has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PMGC has a beta of -0.23, meaning that its stock price is 123% less volatile than the broader market.

22.2% of PMGC shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.3% of FibroBiologics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of PMGC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

FibroBiologics and PMGC tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get PMGC News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ELAB and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ELAB and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ELAB vs. The Competition

MetricPMGCDIVERSIFIED OPS IndustryMulti-Sector SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.29M$17.17B$16.21B$12.59B
Dividend YieldN/A4.71%4.39%8.43%
P/E Ratio-0.0129.6525.4124.33
Price / Sales2.194.463.8892.04
Price / CashN/A49.4747.2959.39
Price / Book0.014.433.986.30
Net Income-$7.75M$910.50M$921.41M$331.45M
7 Day Performance5.19%-3.04%-2.65%-0.08%
1 Month Performance-23.63%-10.63%-9.25%-0.96%
1 Year Performance-99.42%5.33%4.04%19.89%

PMGC Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ELAB
PMGC
0.863 of 5 stars
$1.12
-0.4%
N/A-99.5%$1.29M$590KN/A18
BGMS
Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals
1.4257 of 5 stars
$0.87
-1.5%
N/AN/A$4.80M$750KN/A14
CELZ
Creative Medical Technology
0.5588 of 5 stars
$1.00
-8.3%
N/A-68.1%$4.74M$3KN/A5
CUPR
Cuprina Holdings (Cayman)
1.0932 of 5 stars
$5.09
-11.3%
N/AN/A$4.68M$40KN/A14
ALZN
Alzamend Neuro
2.7863 of 5 stars
$1.15
+0.9%
$28.00
+2,334.8%
-61.7%$4.37MN/AN/A4

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:ELAB) was last updated on 7/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners