Go Pro

Minerva Neurosciences (NERV) Competitors

Minerva Neurosciences logo
$3.97 -0.01 (-0.25%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$3.96 -0.01 (-0.13%)
As of 04:19 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

NERV vs. SLDB, CYRX, ACRS, DSGN, and AURA

Should you buy Minerva Neurosciences stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Minerva Neurosciences with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Minerva Neurosciences include Solid Biosciences (SLDB), CryoPort (CYRX), Aclaris Therapeutics (ACRS), Design Therapeutics (DSGN), and Aura Biosciences (AURA).

How does Minerva Neurosciences compare to Solid Biosciences?

Solid Biosciences (NASDAQ:SLDB) and Minerva Neurosciences (NASDAQ:NERV) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Solid Biosciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Minerva Neurosciences, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Solid BiosciencesN/AN/A-$174.32M-$1.95N/A
Minerva NeurosciencesN/AN/A-$293.42M-$29.16N/A

Solid Biosciences presently has a consensus price target of $17.11, indicating a potential upside of 113.36%. Minerva Neurosciences has a consensus price target of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 164.48%. Given Minerva Neurosciences' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Minerva Neurosciences is more favorable than Solid Biosciences.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Solid Biosciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91
Minerva Neurosciences
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Solid Biosciences has a beta of 2.41, indicating that its share price is 141% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Minerva Neurosciences has a beta of -0.1, indicating that its share price is 110% less volatile than the broader market.

Minerva Neurosciences' return on equity of 0.00% beat Solid Biosciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Solid BiosciencesN/A -73.42% -61.13%
Minerva Neurosciences N/A N/A -32.63%

81.5% of Solid Biosciences shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.6% of Minerva Neurosciences shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Solid Biosciences shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Minerva Neurosciences shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Solid Biosciences had 2 more articles in the media than Minerva Neurosciences. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Solid Biosciences and 2 mentions for Minerva Neurosciences. Minerva Neurosciences' average media sentiment score of 1.75 beat Solid Biosciences' score of 1.28 indicating that Minerva Neurosciences is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Solid Biosciences
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Minerva Neurosciences
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

Solid Biosciences beats Minerva Neurosciences on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerva Neurosciences compare to CryoPort?

Minerva Neurosciences (NASDAQ:NERV) and CryoPort (NASDAQ:CYRX) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, CryoPort had 1 more articles in the media than Minerva Neurosciences. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for CryoPort and 2 mentions for Minerva Neurosciences. Minerva Neurosciences' average media sentiment score of 1.75 beat CryoPort's score of 0.60 indicating that Minerva Neurosciences is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Minerva Neurosciences
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
CryoPort
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

34.6% of Minerva Neurosciences shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.9% of CryoPort shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Minerva Neurosciences shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.5% of CryoPort shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Minerva Neurosciences has a beta of -0.1, meaning that its share price is 110% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CryoPort has a beta of 1.89, meaning that its share price is 89% more volatile than the broader market.

CryoPort has a net margin of 41.57% compared to Minerva Neurosciences' net margin of 0.00%. Minerva Neurosciences' return on equity of 0.00% beat CryoPort's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Minerva NeurosciencesN/A N/A -32.63%
CryoPort 41.57%-7.92%-4.79%

Minerva Neurosciences presently has a consensus price target of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 164.48%. CryoPort has a consensus price target of $16.38, indicating a potential upside of 5.71%. Given Minerva Neurosciences' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Minerva Neurosciences is more favorable than CryoPort.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Minerva Neurosciences
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
CryoPort
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

CryoPort has higher revenue and earnings than Minerva Neurosciences. Minerva Neurosciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CryoPort, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Minerva NeurosciencesN/AN/A-$293.42M-$29.16N/A
CryoPort$176.18M4.43$78.30M$1.3511.47

Summary

CryoPort beats Minerva Neurosciences on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerva Neurosciences compare to Aclaris Therapeutics?

Aclaris Therapeutics (NASDAQ:ACRS) and Minerva Neurosciences (NASDAQ:NERV) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

98.3% of Aclaris Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.6% of Minerva Neurosciences shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Aclaris Therapeutics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Minerva Neurosciences shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Aclaris Therapeutics had 1 more articles in the media than Minerva Neurosciences. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Aclaris Therapeutics and 2 mentions for Minerva Neurosciences. Minerva Neurosciences' average media sentiment score of 1.75 beat Aclaris Therapeutics' score of 1.24 indicating that Minerva Neurosciences is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Aclaris Therapeutics
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Minerva Neurosciences
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Aclaris Therapeutics currently has a consensus price target of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 107.96%. Minerva Neurosciences has a consensus price target of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 164.48%. Given Minerva Neurosciences' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Minerva Neurosciences is more favorable than Aclaris Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aclaris Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.13
Minerva Neurosciences
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Aclaris Therapeutics has higher revenue and earnings than Minerva Neurosciences. Aclaris Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Minerva Neurosciences, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aclaris Therapeutics$7.83M98.64-$64.92M-$0.56N/A
Minerva NeurosciencesN/AN/A-$293.42M-$29.16N/A

Aclaris Therapeutics has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Minerva Neurosciences has a beta of -0.1, suggesting that its share price is 110% less volatile than the broader market.

Minerva Neurosciences has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Aclaris Therapeutics' net margin of -832.58%. Minerva Neurosciences' return on equity of 0.00% beat Aclaris Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aclaris Therapeutics-832.58% -55.89% -38.49%
Minerva Neurosciences N/A N/A -32.63%

Summary

Aclaris Therapeutics beats Minerva Neurosciences on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerva Neurosciences compare to Design Therapeutics?

Minerva Neurosciences (NASDAQ:NERV) and Design Therapeutics (NASDAQ:DSGN) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk and media sentiment.

Minerva Neurosciences currently has a consensus price target of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 164.48%. Design Therapeutics has a consensus price target of $16.50, indicating a potential upside of 29.31%. Given Minerva Neurosciences' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Minerva Neurosciences is more favorable than Design Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Minerva Neurosciences
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Design Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88

34.6% of Minerva Neurosciences shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.6% of Design Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Minerva Neurosciences shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.1% of Design Therapeutics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Minerva Neurosciences' return on equity of 0.00% beat Design Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Minerva NeurosciencesN/A N/A -32.63%
Design Therapeutics N/A -33.07%-31.29%

Minerva Neurosciences has a beta of -0.1, indicating that its share price is 110% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Design Therapeutics has a beta of 1.63, indicating that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Design Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Minerva Neurosciences, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Minerva NeurosciencesN/AN/A-$293.42M-$29.16N/A
Design TherapeuticsN/AN/A-$69.79M-$1.20N/A

In the previous week, Design Therapeutics had 3 more articles in the media than Minerva Neurosciences. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Design Therapeutics and 2 mentions for Minerva Neurosciences. Minerva Neurosciences' average media sentiment score of 1.75 beat Design Therapeutics' score of 0.39 indicating that Minerva Neurosciences is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Minerva Neurosciences
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Design Therapeutics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Design Therapeutics beats Minerva Neurosciences on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Minerva Neurosciences compare to Aura Biosciences?

Aura Biosciences (NASDAQ:AURA) and Minerva Neurosciences (NASDAQ:NERV) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Minerva Neurosciences had 2 more articles in the media than Aura Biosciences. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Minerva Neurosciences and 0 mentions for Aura Biosciences. Minerva Neurosciences' average media sentiment score of 1.75 beat Aura Biosciences' score of 0.00 indicating that Minerva Neurosciences is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aura Biosciences Neutral
Minerva Neurosciences Very Positive

Minerva Neurosciences' return on equity of 0.00% beat Aura Biosciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aura BiosciencesN/A -78.12% -64.08%
Minerva Neurosciences N/A N/A -32.63%

Aura Biosciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Minerva Neurosciences, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aura BiosciencesN/AN/A-$106.19M-$1.74N/A
Minerva NeurosciencesN/AN/A-$293.42M-$29.16N/A

96.8% of Aura Biosciences shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.6% of Minerva Neurosciences shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Aura Biosciences shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Minerva Neurosciences shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Aura Biosciences presently has a consensus target price of $20.50, indicating a potential upside of 191.19%. Minerva Neurosciences has a consensus target price of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 164.48%. Given Aura Biosciences' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Aura Biosciences is more favorable than Minerva Neurosciences.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aura Biosciences
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Minerva Neurosciences
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Aura Biosciences has a beta of 0.4, suggesting that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Minerva Neurosciences has a beta of -0.1, suggesting that its stock price is 110% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Aura Biosciences beats Minerva Neurosciences on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Minerva Neurosciences News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NERV and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NERV and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NERV vs. The Competition

MetricMinerva NeurosciencesPharmaceuticals IndustryHealthcare SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$185.42M$11.63B$6.86B$12.45B
Dividend YieldN/A2.73%2.60%10.03%
P/E Ratio-0.14669.38223.7722.69
Price / SalesN/A731.49588.1092.16
Price / CashN/A14.8228.6434.82
Price / Book-1.2210.3911.026.21
Net Income-$293.42M$2.80B$3.48B$347.49M
7 Day Performance-5.48%0.30%0.56%0.89%
1 Month Performance-22.16%-3.70%-4.14%-3.60%
1 Year Performance106.23%156.59%63.23%20.46%

Minerva Neurosciences Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NERV
Minerva Neurosciences
1.7212 of 5 stars
$3.97
-0.3%
$10.50
+164.5%
+106.8%$185.42MN/AN/A9
SLDB
Solid Biosciences
2.5098 of 5 stars
$7.97
+1.0%
$17.11
+114.7%
+18.0%$776.77MN/AN/A100
CYRX
CryoPort
2.4344 of 5 stars
$15.17
+0.1%
$16.38
+7.9%
+107.6%$763.59M$176.18M11.241,186
ACRS
Aclaris Therapeutics
2.4223 of 5 stars
$5.33
-0.7%
$11.50
+115.8%
+239.9%$749.99M$7.83MN/A100
DSGN
Design Therapeutics
2.223 of 5 stars
$11.87
-0.1%
$16.50
+39.0%
+218.8%$741.99MN/AN/A40

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:NERV) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners