NASDAQ:FCEL

FuelCell Energy Competitors

Followed 273 Times Searched 965 Times

$16.94

+0.56 (+3.42 %)

(As of 02/26/2021 12:00 AM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$15.76

Now: $16.94▼

$17.58

50-Day Range

$15.32

MA: $20.33▼

$27.96

52-Week Range

$1.00

Now: $16.94▼

$29.44

Volume28.37 million shs

Average Volume48.01 million shs

Market Capitalization$5.46 billion

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta5.33

FuelCell Energy (NASDAQ:FCEL) Vs. ETN, EMR, ROP, ROK, AME, and ENPH

Should you be buying FCEL stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "electrical components & equipment" are considered alternatives and competitors to FuelCell Energy, including Eaton (ETN), Emerson Electric (EMR), Roper Technologies (ROP), Rockwell Automation (ROK), AMETEK (AME), and Enphase Energy (ENPH).

FuelCell Energy vs. Eaton Stock

FuelCell Energy (NASDAQ:FCEL) and Eaton (NYSE:ETN) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FuelCell Energy and Eaton's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FuelCell Energy	$60.75 million	89.90	$-77,570,000.00	($1.30)	-13.03
Eaton	$21.39 billion	2.43	$2.21 billion	$5.67	22.96

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than FuelCell Energy. FuelCell Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eaton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

FuelCell Energy has a beta of 5.33, meaning that its share price is 433% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Eaton has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

33.7% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.9% of Eaton shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Eaton shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares FuelCell Energy and Eaton's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FuelCell Energy	-162.42%	-74.92%	-13.77%
Eaton	7.53%	11.94%	5.66%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for FuelCell Energy and Eaton, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FuelCell Energy	2	3	0	0	1.60
Eaton	0	7	10	0	2.59

FuelCell Energy currently has a consensus target price of $8.8333, indicating a potential downside of 47.86%. Eaton has a consensus target price of $119.2222, indicating a potential downside of 8.42%. Given Eaton's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Eaton is more favorable than FuelCell Energy.

Summary

Eaton beats FuelCell Energy on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

FuelCell Energy vs. Emerson Electric Stock

FuelCell Energy (NASDAQ:FCEL) and Emerson Electric (NYSE:EMR) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FuelCell Energy and Emerson Electric's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FuelCell Energy	$60.75 million	89.90	$-77,570,000.00	($1.30)	-13.03
Emerson Electric	$16.79 billion	3.07	$1.97 billion	$3.46	24.83

Emerson Electric has higher revenue and earnings than FuelCell Energy. FuelCell Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Emerson Electric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

FuelCell Energy has a beta of 5.33, meaning that its share price is 433% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Emerson Electric has a beta of 1.55, meaning that its share price is 55% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

33.7% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.6% of Emerson Electric shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Emerson Electric shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares FuelCell Energy and Emerson Electric's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FuelCell Energy	-162.42%	-74.92%	-13.77%
Emerson Electric	11.71%	25.98%	9.61%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for FuelCell Energy and Emerson Electric, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FuelCell Energy	2	3	0	0	1.60
Emerson Electric	0	4	11	0	2.73

FuelCell Energy currently has a consensus target price of $8.8333, indicating a potential downside of 47.86%. Emerson Electric has a consensus target price of $82.8571, indicating a potential downside of 3.54%. Given Emerson Electric's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Emerson Electric is more favorable than FuelCell Energy.

Summary

Emerson Electric beats FuelCell Energy on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

FuelCell Energy vs. Roper Technologies Stock

FuelCell Energy (NASDAQ:FCEL) and Roper Technologies (NYSE:ROP) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares FuelCell Energy and Roper Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FuelCell Energy	-162.42%	-74.92%	-13.77%
Roper Technologies	28.89%	13.53%	6.70%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for FuelCell Energy and Roper Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FuelCell Energy	2	3	0	0	1.60
Roper Technologies	2	2	4	0	2.25

FuelCell Energy currently has a consensus target price of $8.8333, indicating a potential downside of 47.86%. Roper Technologies has a consensus target price of $414.1250, indicating a potential upside of 9.67%. Given Roper Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Roper Technologies is more favorable than FuelCell Energy.

Risk and Volatility

FuelCell Energy has a beta of 5.33, meaning that its share price is 433% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Roper Technologies has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

33.7% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.7% of Roper Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Roper Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FuelCell Energy and Roper Technologies' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FuelCell Energy	$60.75 million	89.90	$-77,570,000.00	($1.30)	-13.03
Roper Technologies	$5.37 billion	7.38	$1.77 billion	$13.05	28.94

Roper Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than FuelCell Energy. FuelCell Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Roper Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Roper Technologies beats FuelCell Energy on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

FuelCell Energy vs. Rockwell Automation Stock

Rockwell Automation (NYSE:ROK) and FuelCell Energy (NASDAQ:FCEL) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Rockwell Automation and FuelCell Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Rockwell Automation	16.17%	81.39%	12.65%
FuelCell Energy	-162.42%	-74.92%	-13.77%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Rockwell Automation and FuelCell Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Rockwell Automation	3	9	8	0	2.25
FuelCell Energy	2	3	0	0	1.60

Rockwell Automation currently has a consensus price target of $234.4667, indicating a potential downside of 3.62%. FuelCell Energy has a consensus price target of $8.8333, indicating a potential downside of 47.86%. Given Rockwell Automation's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Rockwell Automation is more favorable than FuelCell Energy.

Volatility & Risk

Rockwell Automation has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FuelCell Energy has a beta of 5.33, indicating that its stock price is 433% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

76.2% of Rockwell Automation shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.7% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Rockwell Automation shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Rockwell Automation and FuelCell Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Rockwell Automation	$6.33 billion	4.46	$1.02 billion	$7.68	31.68
FuelCell Energy	$60.75 million	89.90	$-77,570,000.00	($1.30)	-13.03

Rockwell Automation has higher revenue and earnings than FuelCell Energy. FuelCell Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rockwell Automation, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Rockwell Automation beats FuelCell Energy on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

FuelCell Energy vs. AMETEK Stock

AMETEK (NYSE:AME) and FuelCell Energy (NASDAQ:FCEL) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares AMETEK and FuelCell Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
AMETEK	18.77%	16.29%	8.55%
FuelCell Energy	-162.42%	-74.92%	-13.77%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for AMETEK and FuelCell Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
AMETEK	0	2	8	0	2.80
FuelCell Energy	2	3	0	0	1.60

AMETEK currently has a consensus price target of $109.75, indicating a potential downside of 6.97%. FuelCell Energy has a consensus price target of $8.8333, indicating a potential downside of 47.86%. Given AMETEK's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe AMETEK is more favorable than FuelCell Energy.

Volatility & Risk

AMETEK has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FuelCell Energy has a beta of 5.33, indicating that its stock price is 433% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

85.7% of AMETEK shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.7% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of AMETEK shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares AMETEK and FuelCell Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
AMETEK	$5.16 billion	5.27	$861.30 million	$4.19	28.16
FuelCell Energy	$60.75 million	89.90	$-77,570,000.00	($1.30)	-13.03

AMETEK has higher revenue and earnings than FuelCell Energy. FuelCell Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AMETEK, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

AMETEK beats FuelCell Energy on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

FuelCell Energy vs. Enphase Energy Stock

Enphase Energy (NASDAQ:ENPH) and FuelCell Energy (NASDAQ:FCEL) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Enphase Energy and FuelCell Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Enphase Energy	$624.33 million	36.38	$161.15 million	$0.67	262.78
FuelCell Energy	$60.75 million	89.90	$-77,570,000.00	($1.30)	-13.03

Enphase Energy has higher revenue and earnings than FuelCell Energy. FuelCell Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enphase Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Enphase Energy and FuelCell Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Enphase Energy	24.69%	30.06%	10.78%
FuelCell Energy	-162.42%	-74.92%	-13.77%

Volatility & Risk

Enphase Energy has a beta of 1.44, indicating that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FuelCell Energy has a beta of 5.33, indicating that its stock price is 433% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Enphase Energy and FuelCell Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Enphase Energy	1	6	11	0	2.56
FuelCell Energy	2	3	0	0	1.60

Enphase Energy currently has a consensus price target of $177.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.53%. FuelCell Energy has a consensus price target of $8.8333, indicating a potential downside of 47.86%. Given Enphase Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Enphase Energy is more favorable than FuelCell Energy.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

72.8% of Enphase Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.7% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 7.1% of Enphase Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Enphase Energy beats FuelCell Energy on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.