S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
pixel
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
pixel
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
pixel
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
pixel
Log in
NASDAQ:FCEL

FuelCell Energy Competitors

$16.94
+0.56 (+3.42 %)
(As of 02/26/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$15.76
Now: $16.94
$17.58
50-Day Range
$15.32
MA: $20.33
$27.96
52-Week Range
$1.00
Now: $16.94
$29.44
Volume28.37 million shs
Average Volume48.01 million shs
Market Capitalization$5.46 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta5.33

Competitors

FuelCell Energy (NASDAQ:FCEL) Vs. ETN, EMR, ROP, ROK, AME, and ENPH

Should you be buying FCEL stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "electrical components & equipment" are considered alternatives and competitors to FuelCell Energy, including Eaton (ETN), Emerson Electric (EMR), Roper Technologies (ROP), Rockwell Automation (ROK), AMETEK (AME), and Enphase Energy (ENPH).

FuelCell Energy (NASDAQ:FCEL) and Eaton (NYSE:ETN) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FuelCell Energy and Eaton's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FuelCell Energy$60.75 million89.90$-77,570,000.00($1.30)-13.03
Eaton$21.39 billion2.43$2.21 billion$5.6722.96

Eaton has higher revenue and earnings than FuelCell Energy. FuelCell Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eaton, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

FuelCell Energy has a beta of 5.33, meaning that its share price is 433% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Eaton has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

33.7% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.9% of Eaton shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Eaton shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares FuelCell Energy and Eaton's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FuelCell Energy-162.42%-74.92%-13.77%
Eaton7.53%11.94%5.66%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for FuelCell Energy and Eaton, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FuelCell Energy23001.60
Eaton071002.59

FuelCell Energy currently has a consensus target price of $8.8333, indicating a potential downside of 47.86%. Eaton has a consensus target price of $119.2222, indicating a potential downside of 8.42%. Given Eaton's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Eaton is more favorable than FuelCell Energy.

Summary

Eaton beats FuelCell Energy on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

FuelCell Energy (NASDAQ:FCEL) and Emerson Electric (NYSE:EMR) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FuelCell Energy and Emerson Electric's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FuelCell Energy$60.75 million89.90$-77,570,000.00($1.30)-13.03
Emerson Electric$16.79 billion3.07$1.97 billion$3.4624.83

Emerson Electric has higher revenue and earnings than FuelCell Energy. FuelCell Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Emerson Electric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

FuelCell Energy has a beta of 5.33, meaning that its share price is 433% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Emerson Electric has a beta of 1.55, meaning that its share price is 55% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

33.7% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.6% of Emerson Electric shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Emerson Electric shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares FuelCell Energy and Emerson Electric's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FuelCell Energy-162.42%-74.92%-13.77%
Emerson Electric11.71%25.98%9.61%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for FuelCell Energy and Emerson Electric, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FuelCell Energy23001.60
Emerson Electric041102.73

FuelCell Energy currently has a consensus target price of $8.8333, indicating a potential downside of 47.86%. Emerson Electric has a consensus target price of $82.8571, indicating a potential downside of 3.54%. Given Emerson Electric's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Emerson Electric is more favorable than FuelCell Energy.

Summary

Emerson Electric beats FuelCell Energy on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

FuelCell Energy (NASDAQ:FCEL) and Roper Technologies (NYSE:ROP) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares FuelCell Energy and Roper Technologies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
FuelCell Energy-162.42%-74.92%-13.77%
Roper Technologies28.89%13.53%6.70%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for FuelCell Energy and Roper Technologies, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
FuelCell Energy23001.60
Roper Technologies22402.25

FuelCell Energy currently has a consensus target price of $8.8333, indicating a potential downside of 47.86%. Roper Technologies has a consensus target price of $414.1250, indicating a potential upside of 9.67%. Given Roper Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Roper Technologies is more favorable than FuelCell Energy.

Risk and Volatility

FuelCell Energy has a beta of 5.33, meaning that its share price is 433% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Roper Technologies has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

33.7% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.7% of Roper Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Roper Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares FuelCell Energy and Roper Technologies' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FuelCell Energy$60.75 million89.90$-77,570,000.00($1.30)-13.03
Roper Technologies$5.37 billion7.38$1.77 billion$13.0528.94

Roper Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than FuelCell Energy. FuelCell Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Roper Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Roper Technologies beats FuelCell Energy on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Rockwell Automation (NYSE:ROK) and FuelCell Energy (NASDAQ:FCEL) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Rockwell Automation and FuelCell Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Rockwell Automation16.17%81.39%12.65%
FuelCell Energy-162.42%-74.92%-13.77%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Rockwell Automation and FuelCell Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Rockwell Automation39802.25
FuelCell Energy23001.60

Rockwell Automation currently has a consensus price target of $234.4667, indicating a potential downside of 3.62%. FuelCell Energy has a consensus price target of $8.8333, indicating a potential downside of 47.86%. Given Rockwell Automation's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Rockwell Automation is more favorable than FuelCell Energy.

Volatility & Risk

Rockwell Automation has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FuelCell Energy has a beta of 5.33, indicating that its stock price is 433% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

76.2% of Rockwell Automation shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.7% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Rockwell Automation shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Rockwell Automation and FuelCell Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rockwell Automation$6.33 billion4.46$1.02 billion$7.6831.68
FuelCell Energy$60.75 million89.90$-77,570,000.00($1.30)-13.03

Rockwell Automation has higher revenue and earnings than FuelCell Energy. FuelCell Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rockwell Automation, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Rockwell Automation beats FuelCell Energy on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

AMETEK (NYSE:AME) and FuelCell Energy (NASDAQ:FCEL) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares AMETEK and FuelCell Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
AMETEK18.77%16.29%8.55%
FuelCell Energy-162.42%-74.92%-13.77%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for AMETEK and FuelCell Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
AMETEK02802.80
FuelCell Energy23001.60

AMETEK currently has a consensus price target of $109.75, indicating a potential downside of 6.97%. FuelCell Energy has a consensus price target of $8.8333, indicating a potential downside of 47.86%. Given AMETEK's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe AMETEK is more favorable than FuelCell Energy.

Volatility & Risk

AMETEK has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FuelCell Energy has a beta of 5.33, indicating that its stock price is 433% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

85.7% of AMETEK shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.7% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of AMETEK shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares AMETEK and FuelCell Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
AMETEK$5.16 billion5.27$861.30 million$4.1928.16
FuelCell Energy$60.75 million89.90$-77,570,000.00($1.30)-13.03

AMETEK has higher revenue and earnings than FuelCell Energy. FuelCell Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AMETEK, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

AMETEK beats FuelCell Energy on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Enphase Energy (NASDAQ:ENPH) and FuelCell Energy (NASDAQ:FCEL) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Enphase Energy and FuelCell Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Enphase Energy$624.33 million36.38$161.15 million$0.67262.78
FuelCell Energy$60.75 million89.90$-77,570,000.00($1.30)-13.03

Enphase Energy has higher revenue and earnings than FuelCell Energy. FuelCell Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enphase Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Enphase Energy and FuelCell Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Enphase Energy24.69%30.06%10.78%
FuelCell Energy-162.42%-74.92%-13.77%

Volatility & Risk

Enphase Energy has a beta of 1.44, indicating that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FuelCell Energy has a beta of 5.33, indicating that its stock price is 433% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Enphase Energy and FuelCell Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Enphase Energy161102.56
FuelCell Energy23001.60

Enphase Energy currently has a consensus price target of $177.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.53%. FuelCell Energy has a consensus price target of $8.8333, indicating a potential downside of 47.86%. Given Enphase Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Enphase Energy is more favorable than FuelCell Energy.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

72.8% of Enphase Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.7% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 7.1% of Enphase Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of FuelCell Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Enphase Energy beats FuelCell Energy on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


FuelCell Energy Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Eaton logo
ETN
Eaton
2.3$130.19+0.0%$51.89 billion$21.39 billion38.29Dividend Increase
Emerson Electric logo
EMR
Emerson Electric
2.6$85.90+1.7%$51.54 billion$16.79 billion26.51
Roper Technologies logo
ROP
Roper Technologies
2.2$377.62+0.4%$39.63 billion$5.37 billion25.43News Coverage
Rockwell Automation logo
ROK
Rockwell Automation
2.5$243.28+0.5%$28.26 billion$6.33 billion27.74Insider Selling
AMETEK logo
AME
AMETEK
2.0$117.97+2.0%$27.20 billion$5.16 billion31.21Gap Down
Enphase Energy logo
ENPH
Enphase Energy
1.7$176.06+4.9%$22.72 billion$624.33 million137.55Gap Up
Generac logo
GNRC
Generac
1.6$329.56+4.2%$20.71 billion$2.20 billion71.03Gap Up
II-VI logo
IIVI
II-VI
1.7$84.30+2.1%$8.83 billion$2.38 billion-766.29
Regal Beloit logo
RBC
Regal Beloit
2.0$136.67+0.3%$5.55 billion$3.24 billion31.78Analyst Revision
Acuity Brands logo
AYI
Acuity Brands
2.0$123.30+0.3%$4.44 billion$3.33 billion19.27
Vicor logo
VICR
Vicor
1.5$98.49+8.5%$4.26 billion$262.98 million547.17Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Up
EnerSys logo
ENS
EnerSys
2.0$90.28+0.7%$3.85 billion$3.09 billion40.12
Franklin Electric logo
FELE
Franklin Electric
1.8$75.06+0.5%$3.47 billion$1.31 billion37.72Insider Selling
Brady logo
BRC
Brady
2.4$52.41+2.1%$2.73 billion$1.08 billion25.57Insider Selling
Gap Down
Belden logo
BDC
Belden
1.4$44.21+0.9%$1.97 billion$2.13 billion-9.55
Encore Wire logo
WIRE
Encore Wire
1.8$65.53+0.5%$1.35 billion$1.27 billion23.66Dividend Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
Thermon Group logo
THR
Thermon Group
1.3$20.43+8.2%$678.22 million$383.49 million-2,040.96Gap Down
American Superconductor logo
AMSC
American Superconductor
1.1$23.79+1.3%$656.18 million$63.84 million-25.04
Powell Industries logo
POWL
Powell Industries
1.4$31.13+2.2%$363.44 million$518.50 million21.77Gap Down
Preformed Line Products logo
PLPC
Preformed Line Products
1.3$73.36+3.7%$360.56 million$444.86 million11.23Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Gap Down
LSI Industries logo
LYTS
LSI Industries
2.2$9.02+2.3%$238.45 million$305.56 million33.41
This page was last updated on 2/27/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.