Go Pro

FTAI Infrastructure (FIP) Competitors

FTAI Infrastructure logo
$4.54 +0.07 (+1.57%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$4.54 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FIP vs. NMM, LIND, ULCC, GEL, and CMRE

Should you buy FTAI Infrastructure stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares FTAI Infrastructure with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with FTAI Infrastructure include Navios Maritime Partners (NMM), Lindblad Expeditions (LIND), Frontier Group (ULCC), Genesis Energy (GEL), and Costamare (CMRE). These companies are all part of the "transportation" industry.

How does FTAI Infrastructure compare to Navios Maritime Partners?

FTAI Infrastructure (NASDAQ:FIP) and Navios Maritime Partners (NYSE:NMM) are both transportation companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and risk.

87.4% of FTAI Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.7% of Navios Maritime Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of FTAI Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

FTAI Infrastructure has a beta of 1.76, meaning that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Navios Maritime Partners has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

Navios Maritime Partners has a net margin of 25.05% compared to FTAI Infrastructure's net margin of -68.58%. Navios Maritime Partners' return on equity of 10.48% beat FTAI Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FTAI Infrastructure-68.58% -147.01% -7.66%
Navios Maritime Partners 25.05%10.48%5.83%

In the previous week, Navios Maritime Partners had 16 more articles in the media than FTAI Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Navios Maritime Partners and 1 mentions for FTAI Infrastructure. Navios Maritime Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.63 beat FTAI Infrastructure's score of 0.00 indicating that Navios Maritime Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FTAI Infrastructure
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Navios Maritime Partners
8 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

FTAI Infrastructure presently has a consensus target price of $9.92, indicating a potential upside of 118.43%. Navios Maritime Partners has a consensus target price of $85.00, indicating a potential upside of 12.50%. Given FTAI Infrastructure's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe FTAI Infrastructure is more favorable than Navios Maritime Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FTAI Infrastructure
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Navios Maritime Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

FTAI Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Navios Maritime Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. FTAI Infrastructure pays out -2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Navios Maritime Partners pays out 2.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. FTAI Infrastructure is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Navios Maritime Partners has higher revenue and earnings than FTAI Infrastructure. FTAI Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Navios Maritime Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FTAI Infrastructure$594.72M0.90-$107.17M-$4.51N/A
Navios Maritime Partners$1.34B1.61$285.33M$11.876.37

Summary

Navios Maritime Partners beats FTAI Infrastructure on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FTAI Infrastructure compare to Lindblad Expeditions?

Lindblad Expeditions (NASDAQ:LIND) and FTAI Infrastructure (NASDAQ:FIP) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Lindblad Expeditions has a net margin of -2.86% compared to FTAI Infrastructure's net margin of -68.58%. Lindblad Expeditions' return on equity of 0.00% beat FTAI Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lindblad Expeditions-2.86% N/A -0.44%
FTAI Infrastructure -68.58%-147.01%-7.66%

In the previous week, Lindblad Expeditions had 3 more articles in the media than FTAI Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Lindblad Expeditions and 1 mentions for FTAI Infrastructure. Lindblad Expeditions' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat FTAI Infrastructure's score of 0.00 indicating that Lindblad Expeditions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lindblad Expeditions
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
FTAI Infrastructure
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Lindblad Expeditions has higher revenue and earnings than FTAI Infrastructure. Lindblad Expeditions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FTAI Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lindblad Expeditions$771.02M2.26-$29.72M-$0.54N/A
FTAI Infrastructure$594.72M0.90-$107.17M-$4.51N/A

Lindblad Expeditions presently has a consensus price target of $30.50, suggesting a potential upside of 15.01%. FTAI Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $9.92, suggesting a potential upside of 118.43%. Given FTAI Infrastructure's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FTAI Infrastructure is more favorable than Lindblad Expeditions.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lindblad Expeditions
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
FTAI Infrastructure
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

75.9% of Lindblad Expeditions shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of FTAI Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 26.1% of Lindblad Expeditions shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of FTAI Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lindblad Expeditions has a beta of 2.22, suggesting that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FTAI Infrastructure has a beta of 1.76, suggesting that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Lindblad Expeditions beats FTAI Infrastructure on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FTAI Infrastructure compare to Frontier Group?

Frontier Group (NASDAQ:ULCC) and FTAI Infrastructure (NASDAQ:FIP) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

FTAI Infrastructure has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Frontier Group. Frontier Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FTAI Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Frontier Group$3.72B0.43-$137M-$1.60N/A
FTAI Infrastructure$594.72M0.90-$107.17M-$4.51N/A

87.4% of FTAI Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 48.0% of Frontier Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of FTAI Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Frontier Group has a net margin of -9.62% compared to FTAI Infrastructure's net margin of -68.58%. Frontier Group's return on equity of -39.20% beat FTAI Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Frontier Group-9.62% -39.20% -2.36%
FTAI Infrastructure -68.58%-147.01%-7.66%

Frontier Group has a beta of 2.56, suggesting that its share price is 156% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FTAI Infrastructure has a beta of 1.76, suggesting that its share price is 76% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Frontier Group had 6 more articles in the media than FTAI Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Frontier Group and 1 mentions for FTAI Infrastructure. Frontier Group's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat FTAI Infrastructure's score of 0.00 indicating that Frontier Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Frontier Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
FTAI Infrastructure
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Frontier Group currently has a consensus price target of $6.86, indicating a potential downside of 1.19%. FTAI Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $9.92, indicating a potential upside of 118.43%. Given FTAI Infrastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FTAI Infrastructure is more favorable than Frontier Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Frontier Group
3 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.63
FTAI Infrastructure
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Frontier Group beats FTAI Infrastructure on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FTAI Infrastructure compare to Genesis Energy?

FTAI Infrastructure (NASDAQ:FIP) and Genesis Energy (NYSE:GEL) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

FTAI Infrastructure presently has a consensus target price of $9.92, indicating a potential upside of 118.43%. Genesis Energy has a consensus target price of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 30.47%. Given FTAI Infrastructure's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe FTAI Infrastructure is more favorable than Genesis Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FTAI Infrastructure
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Genesis Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

87.4% of FTAI Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.8% of Genesis Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of FTAI Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Genesis Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

FTAI Infrastructure has a beta of 1.76, meaning that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Genesis Energy has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

FTAI Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Genesis Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.9%. FTAI Infrastructure pays out -2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Genesis Energy pays out -378.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Genesis Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Genesis Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Genesis Energy has a net margin of 2.11% compared to FTAI Infrastructure's net margin of -68.58%. Genesis Energy's return on equity of 23.65% beat FTAI Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FTAI Infrastructure-68.58% -147.01% -7.66%
Genesis Energy 2.11%23.65%0.73%

In the previous week, FTAI Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than Genesis Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for FTAI Infrastructure and 0 mentions for Genesis Energy. FTAI Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Genesis Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
FTAI Infrastructure Neutral
Genesis Energy Neutral

FTAI Infrastructure has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Genesis Energy. Genesis Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FTAI Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FTAI Infrastructure$594.72M0.90-$107.17M-$4.51N/A
Genesis Energy$1.63B1.09-$440.40M-$0.19N/A

Summary

Genesis Energy beats FTAI Infrastructure on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FTAI Infrastructure compare to Costamare?

Costamare (NYSE:CMRE) and FTAI Infrastructure (NASDAQ:FIP) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Costamare pays an annual dividend of $0.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. FTAI Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Costamare pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. FTAI Infrastructure pays out -2.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Costamare presently has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 19.65%. FTAI Infrastructure has a consensus target price of $9.92, suggesting a potential upside of 118.43%. Given FTAI Infrastructure's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe FTAI Infrastructure is more favorable than Costamare.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Costamare
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
FTAI Infrastructure
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

58.1% of Costamare shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of FTAI Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.2% of Costamare shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of FTAI Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Costamare has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FTAI Infrastructure has a beta of 1.76, indicating that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, FTAI Infrastructure had 1 more articles in the media than Costamare. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for FTAI Infrastructure and 0 mentions for Costamare. Costamare's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled FTAI Infrastructure'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Costamare Neutral
FTAI Infrastructure Neutral

Costamare has a net margin of 39.93% compared to FTAI Infrastructure's net margin of -68.58%. Costamare's return on equity of 16.42% beat FTAI Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Costamare39.93% 16.42% 9.07%
FTAI Infrastructure -68.58%-147.01%-7.66%

Costamare has higher revenue and earnings than FTAI Infrastructure. FTAI Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Costamare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Costamare$877.90M2.05$364.58M$2.685.57
FTAI Infrastructure$594.72M0.90-$107.17M-$4.51N/A

Summary

Costamare beats FTAI Infrastructure on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FTAI Infrastructure News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FIP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FIP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FIP vs. The Competition

MetricFTAI InfrastructureREAL ESTATE OPS IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$536.47M$5.97B$14.24B$12.61B
Dividend Yield2.73%4.52%5.72%7.79%
P/E Ratio-1.0141.2920.5124.57
Price / Sales0.904.1943.85110.43
Price / Cash34.9116.1419.1759.17
Price / Book-3.601.492.266.39
Net Income-$107.17M$292.80M$1.14B$331.53M
7 Day Performance2.25%-1.82%0.23%0.32%
1 Month Performance6.07%-0.39%1.65%2.16%
1 Year Performance-28.16%-7.93%12.16%20.99%

FTAI Infrastructure Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FIP
FTAI Infrastructure
2.0361 of 5 stars
$4.54
+1.6%
$9.92
+118.4%
-28.4%$536.47M$594.72MN/A600
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners
4.2708 of 5 stars
$70.26
+1.1%
$85.00
+21.0%
+96.0%$1.99B$1.34B5.92186
LIND
Lindblad Expeditions
2.7308 of 5 stars
$28.24
-0.4%
$28.25
+0.0%
+98.6%$1.86B$771.02MN/A1,550
ULCC
Frontier Group
1.2635 of 5 stars
$7.91
+5.5%
$6.50
-17.8%
+92.0%$1.72B$3.72BN/A7,750
GEL
Genesis Energy
2.8777 of 5 stars
$14.19
+1.0%
$19.00
+33.9%
-14.8%$1.72B$1.63BN/A1,061

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FIP) was last updated on 7/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners