Do analysts rate FORTY or DOX?

Amdocs has a consensus target price of $86.67, suggesting a potential upside of 46.15%. Given Amdocs' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Amdocs is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Formula Systems (1985) 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Amdocs 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.29

Does the media prefer FORTY or DOX?

In the previous week, Amdocs had 1 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Amdocs and 2 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Amdocs' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Formula Systems (1985)'s score of 0.55 indicating that Amdocs is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Formula Systems (1985) 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Amdocs 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer EPAM or FORTY?

EPAM Systems currently has a consensus price target of $116.47, indicating a potential upside of 1.60%. Given EPAM Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe EPAM Systems is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score EPAM Systems 1 Sell rating(s) 10 Hold rating(s) 6 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.29 Formula Systems (1985) 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media refer more to EPAM or FORTY?

In the previous week, EPAM Systems had 3 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for EPAM Systems and 2 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). EPAM Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Formula Systems (1985)'s score of 0.55 indicating that EPAM Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment EPAM Systems 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Formula Systems (1985) 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer KD or FORTY?

Kyndryl currently has a consensus price target of $16.50, indicating a potential upside of 36.91%. Given Kyndryl's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Kyndryl is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Kyndryl 2 Sell rating(s) 7 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.78 Formula Systems (1985) 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media prefer KD or FORTY?

In the previous week, Kyndryl had 11 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Kyndryl and 2 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Kyndryl's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Formula Systems (1985)'s score of 0.55 indicating that Kyndryl is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Kyndryl 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Formula Systems (1985) 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate FORTY or DXC?

DXC Technology has a consensus price target of $12.21, suggesting a potential upside of 13.73%. Given DXC Technology's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe DXC Technology is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Formula Systems (1985) 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 DXC Technology 2 Sell rating(s) 7 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.78

Does the media favor FORTY or DXC?

In the previous week, DXC Technology had 9 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for DXC Technology and 2 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat DXC Technology's score of 0.40 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Formula Systems (1985) 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive DXC Technology 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate FORTY or GLOB?

Globant has a consensus target price of $46.38, suggesting a potential upside of 30.43%. Given Globant's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Globant is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Formula Systems (1985) 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Globant 2 Sell rating(s) 11 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.17

Which has better earnings & valuation, FORTY or GLOB?

Formula Systems (1985) has higher revenue and earnings than Globant. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Globant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Formula Systems (1985) $2.63B 0.70 $606.48M $39.83 2.99 Globant $2.45B 0.63 $102.92M $2.55 13.94

Does the media favor FORTY or GLOB?

In the previous week, Globant had 2 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Globant and 2 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Globant's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Formula Systems (1985)'s score of 0.55 indicating that Globant is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Formula Systems (1985) 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Globant 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) Competitors

$119.20 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 09/17/2026

Compare

FORTY vs. DOX, EPAM, KD, DXC, and GLOB

Should you buy Formula Systems (1985) stock or one of its competitors? Formula Systems (1985)'s main competitors and comparable companies include Amdocs (DOX), EPAM Systems (EPAM), Kyndryl (KD), DXC Technology (DXC), and Globant (GLOB). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "it consulting & other services" industry.

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Amdocs?

Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) and Amdocs (NASDAQ:DOX) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Amdocs shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.4% of Amdocs shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amdocs has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Formula Systems (1985) pays an annual dividend of $0.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Amdocs pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Formula Systems (1985) pays out 1.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Amdocs pays out 54.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Amdocs has increased its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Amdocs is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Amdocs had 1 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Amdocs and 2 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Amdocs' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Formula Systems (1985)'s score of 0.55 indicating that Amdocs is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Formula Systems (1985)	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Amdocs	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Amdocs has a consensus target price of $86.67, suggesting a potential upside of 46.15%. Given Amdocs' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Amdocs is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Formula Systems (1985)	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Amdocs	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29

Formula Systems (1985) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Amdocs. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amdocs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Formula Systems (1985)	$2.63B	0.70	$606.48M	$39.83	2.99
Amdocs	$4.53B	1.41	$564.70M	$4.20	14.12

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.57% compared to Amdocs' net margin of 9.75%. Amdocs' return on equity of 20.28% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Formula Systems (1985)	21.57%	4.38%	2.13%
Amdocs	9.75%	20.28%	10.94%

Summary

Amdocs beats Formula Systems (1985) on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to EPAM Systems?

EPAM Systems (NYSE:EPAM) and Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, EPAM Systems had 3 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for EPAM Systems and 2 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). EPAM Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Formula Systems (1985)'s score of 0.55 indicating that EPAM Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
EPAM Systems	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Formula Systems (1985)	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.57% compared to EPAM Systems' net margin of 7.15%. EPAM Systems' return on equity of 15.84% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
EPAM Systems	7.15%	15.84%	11.95%
Formula Systems (1985)	21.57%	4.38%	2.13%

EPAM Systems currently has a consensus price target of $116.47, indicating a potential upside of 1.60%. Given EPAM Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe EPAM Systems is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
EPAM Systems	1 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29
Formula Systems (1985)	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

91.6% of EPAM Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of EPAM Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Formula Systems (1985) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than EPAM Systems. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EPAM Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
EPAM Systems	$5.46B	1.08	$377.68M	$7.38	15.53
Formula Systems (1985)	$2.63B	0.70	$606.48M	$39.83	2.99

EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

EPAM Systems beats Formula Systems (1985) on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Kyndryl?

Kyndryl (NYSE:KD) and Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Kyndryl currently has a consensus price target of $16.50, indicating a potential upside of 36.91%. Given Kyndryl's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Kyndryl is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kyndryl	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.78
Formula Systems (1985)	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

71.5% of Kyndryl shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Kyndryl shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Kyndryl had 11 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Kyndryl and 2 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Kyndryl's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Formula Systems (1985)'s score of 0.55 indicating that Kyndryl is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Kyndryl	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Formula Systems (1985)	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.57% compared to Kyndryl's net margin of 0.58%. Kyndryl's return on equity of 12.24% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kyndryl	0.58%	12.24%	1.33%
Formula Systems (1985)	21.57%	4.38%	2.13%

Formula Systems (1985) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Kyndryl. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kyndryl, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kyndryl	$15.09B	0.17	$199M	$0.37	32.57
Formula Systems (1985)	$2.63B	0.70	$606.48M	$39.83	2.99

Kyndryl has a beta of 1.64, indicating that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Kyndryl beats Formula Systems (1985) on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to DXC Technology?

Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) and DXC Technology (NYSE:DXC) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and dividends.

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.57% compared to DXC Technology's net margin of 0.99%. DXC Technology's return on equity of 15.60% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Formula Systems (1985)	21.57%	4.38%	2.13%
DXC Technology	0.99%	15.60%	3.94%

Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DXC Technology has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.2% of DXC Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of DXC Technology shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Formula Systems (1985) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DXC Technology. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DXC Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Formula Systems (1985)	$2.63B	0.70	$606.48M	$39.83	2.99
DXC Technology	$12.64B	0.14	$18M	$0.70	15.34

In the previous week, DXC Technology had 9 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for DXC Technology and 2 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat DXC Technology's score of 0.40 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Formula Systems (1985)	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
DXC Technology	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

DXC Technology has a consensus price target of $12.21, suggesting a potential upside of 13.73%. Given DXC Technology's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe DXC Technology is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Formula Systems (1985)	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
DXC Technology	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.78

Summary

Formula Systems (1985) beats DXC Technology on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Globant?

Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) and Globant (NYSE:GLOB) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

Globant has a consensus target price of $46.38, suggesting a potential upside of 30.43%. Given Globant's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Globant is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Formula Systems (1985)	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Globant	2 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17

In the previous week, Globant had 2 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Globant and 2 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Globant's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Formula Systems (1985)'s score of 0.55 indicating that Globant is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Formula Systems (1985)	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Globant	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.57% compared to Globant's net margin of 4.63%. Globant's return on equity of 9.28% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Formula Systems (1985)	21.57%	4.38%	2.13%
Globant	4.63%	9.28%	6.18%

34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.6% of Globant shares are held by institutional investors. 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Globant shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Formula Systems (1985) has higher revenue and earnings than Globant. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Globant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Formula Systems (1985)	$2.63B	0.70	$606.48M	$39.83	2.99
Globant	$2.45B	0.63	$102.92M	$2.55	13.94

Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Globant has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Globant beats Formula Systems (1985) on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Formula Systems (1985) News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FORTY and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FORTY vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Formula Systems (1985)	IT Services Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$1.83B	$10.73B	$30.12B	$13.71B
Dividend Yield	0.62%	2.82%	2.75%	12.94%
P/E Ratio	2.99	13.78	77.05	25.39
Price / Sales	0.70	70.85	590.66	89.12
Price / Cash	9.67	45.66	48.01	51.66
Price / Book	1.03	8.17	7.80	6.33
Net Income	$606.48M	$271.17M	$704.48M	$358.24M
7 Day Performance	-2.78%	0.33%	-0.48%	1.20%
1 Month Performance	2.57%	-2.83%	-2.69%	-2.04%
1 Year Performance	-17.11%	21.16%	176.70%	5.41%

Formula Systems (1985) Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FORTY Formula Systems (1985)	1.554 of 5 stars	$119.20 flat	N/A	-10.9%	$1.83B	$2.63B	2.99	19,337
DOX Amdocs	4.8081 of 5 stars	$62.30 -1.4%	$86.67 +39.1%	-28.0%	$6.82B	$4.53B	14.83	26,969	Positive News
EPAM EPAM Systems	2.0441 of 5 stars	$123.75 +0.1%	$116.47 -5.9%	-23.8%	$6.38B	$5.46B	16.77	62,850	Positive News
KD Kyndryl	3.5445 of 5 stars	$13.22 -2.6%	$16.50 +24.9%	-59.4%	$2.96B	$15.09B	35.72	72,000
DXC DXC Technology	4.0922 of 5 stars	$12.04 -0.7%	$12.21 +1.5%	-18.5%	$1.94B	$12.64B	17.19	115,000	Trending News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FORTY) was last updated on 9/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) Competitors

FORTY vs. DOX, EPAM, KD, DXC, and GLOB

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Amdocs?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to EPAM Systems?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Kyndryl?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to DXC Technology?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Globant?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FORTY vs. The Competition

Formula Systems (1985) Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) Competitors

FORTY vs. DOX, EPAM, KD, DXC, and GLOB

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Amdocs?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of FORTY or DOX?

Which has more risk and volatility, FORTY or DOX?

Is FORTY or DOX a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer FORTY or DOX?

Do analysts rate FORTY or DOX?

Which has better earnings and valuation, FORTY or DOX?

Is FORTY or DOX more profitable?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to EPAM Systems?

Does the media refer more to EPAM or FORTY?

Is EPAM or FORTY more profitable?

Do analysts prefer EPAM or FORTY?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in EPAM or FORTY?

Which has better valuation and earnings, EPAM or FORTY?

Which has more risk & volatility, EPAM or FORTY?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Kyndryl?

Do analysts prefer KD or FORTY?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in KD or FORTY?

Does the media prefer KD or FORTY?

Is KD or FORTY more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, KD or FORTY?

Which has more risk and volatility, KD or FORTY?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to DXC Technology?

Is FORTY or DXC more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, FORTY or DXC?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in FORTY or DXC?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, FORTY or DXC?

Does the media favor FORTY or DXC?

Do analysts rate FORTY or DXC?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Globant?

Do analysts rate FORTY or GLOB?

Does the media favor FORTY or GLOB?

Is FORTY or GLOB more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in FORTY or GLOB?

Which has better earnings & valuation, FORTY or GLOB?

Which has more risk & volatility, FORTY or GLOB?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FORTY vs. The Competition

Formula Systems (1985) Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools