Do analysts rate FORTY or DOX?

Amdocs has a consensus target price of $86.67, suggesting a potential upside of 43.87%. Given Amdocs' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Amdocs is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Formula Systems (1985) 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Amdocs 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.29

Does the media prefer FORTY or DOX?

In the previous week, Amdocs had 5 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Amdocs and 1 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Amdocs' score of 0.61 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Formula Systems (1985) 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Amdocs 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate EPAM or FORTY?

EPAM Systems currently has a consensus target price of $116.47, indicating a potential upside of 2.55%. Given EPAM Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe EPAM Systems is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score EPAM Systems 1 Sell rating(s) 10 Hold rating(s) 6 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.29 Formula Systems (1985) 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media refer more to EPAM or FORTY?

In the previous week, EPAM Systems had 8 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for EPAM Systems and 1 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat EPAM Systems' score of 0.30 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment EPAM Systems 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Formula Systems (1985) 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate FORTY or KD?

Kyndryl has a consensus price target of $16.50, suggesting a potential upside of 38.45%. Given Kyndryl's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kyndryl is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Formula Systems (1985) 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Kyndryl 2 Sell rating(s) 7 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.78

Does the media prefer FORTY or KD?

In the previous week, Kyndryl had 3 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Kyndryl and 1 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Kyndryl's score of 0.17 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Formula Systems (1985) 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Kyndryl 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate DXC or FORTY?

DXC Technology currently has a consensus price target of $12.21, indicating a potential downside of 1.08%. Given DXC Technology's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe DXC Technology is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score DXC Technology 2 Sell rating(s) 7 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.78 Formula Systems (1985) 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media refer more to DXC or FORTY?

In the previous week, DXC Technology had 3 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for DXC Technology and 1 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat DXC Technology's score of 0.68 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment DXC Technology 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Formula Systems (1985) 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer FORTY or GLOB?

Globant has a consensus target price of $44.81, indicating a potential upside of 20.94%. Given Globant's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Globant is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Formula Systems (1985) 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Globant 2 Sell rating(s) 11 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.17

Which has better earnings & valuation, FORTY or GLOB?

Formula Systems (1985) has higher revenue and earnings than Globant. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Globant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Formula Systems (1985) $2.63B 0.69 $606.48M $39.83 2.97 Globant $2.45B 0.66 $102.92M $2.55 14.53

Does the media prefer FORTY or GLOB?

In the previous week, Globant had 6 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Globant and 1 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Globant's score of 0.08 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Formula Systems (1985) 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Globant 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) Competitors

$118.14 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 10/7/2026

Compare

FORTY vs. DOX, EPAM, KD, DXC, and GLOB

Should you buy Formula Systems (1985) stock or one of its competitors? Formula Systems (1985)'s main competitors and comparable companies include Amdocs (DOX), EPAM Systems (EPAM), Kyndryl (KD), DXC Technology (DXC), and Globant (GLOB). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "it consulting & other services" industry.

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Amdocs?

Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) and Amdocs (NASDAQ:DOX) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and earnings.

Amdocs has a consensus target price of $86.67, suggesting a potential upside of 43.87%. Given Amdocs' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Amdocs is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Formula Systems (1985)	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Amdocs	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29

34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Amdocs shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.4% of Amdocs shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Formula Systems (1985) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Amdocs. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amdocs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Formula Systems (1985)	$2.63B	0.69	$606.48M	$39.83	2.97
Amdocs	$4.53B	1.43	$564.70M	$4.20	14.34

Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amdocs has a beta of 0.44, indicating that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Amdocs had 5 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Amdocs and 1 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Amdocs' score of 0.61 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Formula Systems (1985)	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Amdocs	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Formula Systems (1985) pays an annual dividend of $1.94 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Amdocs pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Formula Systems (1985) pays out 4.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Amdocs pays out 54.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Amdocs has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Amdocs is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.57% compared to Amdocs' net margin of 9.75%. Amdocs' return on equity of 20.28% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Formula Systems (1985)	21.57%	4.38%	2.13%
Amdocs	9.75%	20.28%	10.94%

Summary

Amdocs beats Formula Systems (1985) on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to EPAM Systems?

EPAM Systems (NYSE:EPAM) and Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

EPAM Systems currently has a consensus target price of $116.47, indicating a potential upside of 2.55%. Given EPAM Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe EPAM Systems is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
EPAM Systems	1 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29
Formula Systems (1985)	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Formula Systems (1985) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than EPAM Systems. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EPAM Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
EPAM Systems	$5.46B	1.07	$377.68M	$7.38	15.39
Formula Systems (1985)	$2.63B	0.69	$606.48M	$39.83	2.97

EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, EPAM Systems had 8 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for EPAM Systems and 1 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat EPAM Systems' score of 0.30 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
EPAM Systems	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Formula Systems (1985)	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

91.6% of EPAM Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of EPAM Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.57% compared to EPAM Systems' net margin of 7.15%. EPAM Systems' return on equity of 15.84% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
EPAM Systems	7.15%	15.84%	11.95%
Formula Systems (1985)	21.57%	4.38%	2.13%

Summary

EPAM Systems beats Formula Systems (1985) on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Kyndryl?

Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) and Kyndryl (NYSE:KD) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.5% of Kyndryl shares are held by institutional investors. 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Kyndryl shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Kyndryl had 3 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Kyndryl and 1 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Kyndryl's score of 0.17 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Formula Systems (1985)	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Kyndryl	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Kyndryl has a consensus price target of $16.50, suggesting a potential upside of 38.45%. Given Kyndryl's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Kyndryl is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Formula Systems (1985)	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Kyndryl	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.78

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.57% compared to Kyndryl's net margin of 0.58%. Kyndryl's return on equity of 12.24% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Formula Systems (1985)	21.57%	4.38%	2.13%
Kyndryl	0.58%	12.24%	1.33%

Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kyndryl has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its share price is 66% more volatile than the broader market.

Formula Systems (1985) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kyndryl. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kyndryl, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Formula Systems (1985)	$2.63B	0.69	$606.48M	$39.83	2.97
Kyndryl	$15.09B	0.17	$199M	$0.37	32.21

Summary

Formula Systems (1985) beats Kyndryl on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to DXC Technology?

DXC Technology (NYSE:DXC) and Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Formula Systems (1985) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than DXC Technology. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DXC Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
DXC Technology	$12.48B	0.16	$18M	$0.70	17.64
Formula Systems (1985)	$2.63B	0.69	$606.48M	$39.83	2.97

DXC Technology has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, DXC Technology had 3 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for DXC Technology and 1 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat DXC Technology's score of 0.68 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
DXC Technology	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Formula Systems (1985)	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

DXC Technology currently has a consensus price target of $12.21, indicating a potential downside of 1.08%. Given DXC Technology's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe DXC Technology is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
DXC Technology	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.78
Formula Systems (1985)	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.57% compared to DXC Technology's net margin of 0.99%. DXC Technology's return on equity of 15.60% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
DXC Technology	0.99%	15.60%	3.94%
Formula Systems (1985)	21.57%	4.38%	2.13%

96.2% of DXC Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of DXC Technology shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

DXC Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Formula Systems (1985) pays an annual dividend of $1.94 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. DXC Technology pays out 120.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Formula Systems (1985) pays out 4.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Formula Systems (1985) beats DXC Technology on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Globant?

Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) and Globant (NYSE:GLOB) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Globant has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.57% compared to Globant's net margin of 4.63%. Globant's return on equity of 9.28% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Formula Systems (1985)	21.57%	4.38%	2.13%
Globant	4.63%	9.28%	6.18%

Formula Systems (1985) has higher revenue and earnings than Globant. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Globant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Formula Systems (1985)	$2.63B	0.69	$606.48M	$39.83	2.97
Globant	$2.45B	0.66	$102.92M	$2.55	14.53

34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.6% of Globant shares are held by institutional investors. 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Globant shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Globant has a consensus target price of $44.81, indicating a potential upside of 20.94%. Given Globant's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Globant is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Formula Systems (1985)	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Globant	2 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17

In the previous week, Globant had 6 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Globant and 1 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Globant's score of 0.08 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Formula Systems (1985)	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Globant	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Formula Systems (1985) and Globant tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Formula Systems (1985) News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FORTY and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FORTY vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Formula Systems (1985)	IT Services Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$1.81B	$11.30B	$32.04B	$13.40B
Dividend Yield	1.64%	2.87%	2.75%	16.36%
P/E Ratio	2.97	13.75	80.46	25.98
Price / Sales	0.69	45.87	580.45	84.81
Price / Cash	9.58	42.80	51.22	53.72
Price / Book	1.02	9.32	8.08	6.27
Net Income	$606.48M	$275.17M	$766.55M	$382.01M
7 Day Performance	4.09%	-0.82%	-1.61%	-1.60%
1 Month Performance	-8.41%	-3.72%	-0.60%	-4.63%
1 Year Performance	-24.69%	13.40%	166.61%	-0.95%

Formula Systems (1985) Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FORTY Formula Systems (1985)	1.5706 of 5 stars	$118.15 flat	N/A	-17.9%	$1.81B	$2.63B	2.97	19,337
DOX Amdocs	4.8475 of 5 stars	$58.49 +0.1%	$86.67 +48.2%	-26.9%	$6.31B	$4.65B	13.93	26,969
EPAM EPAM Systems	2.7548 of 5 stars	$109.26 -0.6%	$116.47 +6.6%	-24.7%	$5.67B	$5.46B	14.81	62,850
KD Kyndryl	3.4757 of 5 stars	$11.51 -0.9%	$16.50 +43.4%	-60.4%	$2.53B	$15.09B	31.09	72,000
DXC DXC Technology	3.0864 of 5 stars	$11.88 +1.9%	$12.21 +2.8%	-7.4%	$1.86B	$12.64B	16.97	115,000	Analyst Upgrade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FORTY) was last updated on 10/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) Competitors

FORTY vs. DOX, EPAM, KD, DXC, and GLOB

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Amdocs?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to EPAM Systems?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Kyndryl?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to DXC Technology?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Globant?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FORTY vs. The Competition

Formula Systems (1985) Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) Competitors

FORTY vs. DOX, EPAM, KD, DXC, and GLOB

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Amdocs?

Do analysts rate FORTY or DOX?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in FORTY or DOX?

Which has better earnings and valuation, FORTY or DOX?

Which has more risk and volatility, FORTY or DOX?

Does the media prefer FORTY or DOX?

Is FORTY or DOX a better dividend stock?

Is FORTY or DOX more profitable?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to EPAM Systems?

Do analysts rate EPAM or FORTY?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, EPAM or FORTY?

Which has more volatility and risk, EPAM or FORTY?

Does the media refer more to EPAM or FORTY?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in EPAM or FORTY?

Is EPAM or FORTY more profitable?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Kyndryl?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of FORTY or KD?

Does the media prefer FORTY or KD?

Do analysts rate FORTY or KD?

Is FORTY or KD more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, FORTY or KD?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, FORTY or KD?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to DXC Technology?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, DXC or FORTY?

Which has more risk and volatility, DXC or FORTY?

Does the media refer more to DXC or FORTY?

Do analysts rate DXC or FORTY?

Is DXC or FORTY more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in DXC or FORTY?

Is DXC or FORTY a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Globant?

Which has more volatility and risk, FORTY or GLOB?

Is FORTY or GLOB more profitable?

Which has better earnings & valuation, FORTY or GLOB?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in FORTY or GLOB?

Do analysts prefer FORTY or GLOB?

Does the media prefer FORTY or GLOB?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FORTY vs. The Competition

Formula Systems (1985) Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools