Do analysts recommend FORTY or DOX?

Amdocs has a consensus target price of $86.67, suggesting a potential upside of 37.76%. Given Amdocs' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Amdocs is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Formula Systems (1985) 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Amdocs 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.29

Does the media prefer FORTY or DOX?

In the previous week, Amdocs had 9 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Amdocs and 11 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Amdocs' score of 0.35 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Formula Systems (1985) 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Amdocs 2 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate EPAM or FORTY?

EPAM Systems currently has a consensus price target of $116.47, indicating a potential upside of 1.40%. Given EPAM Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe EPAM Systems is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score EPAM Systems 1 Sell rating(s) 10 Hold rating(s) 6 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.29 Formula Systems (1985) 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media favor EPAM or FORTY?

In the previous week, EPAM Systems had 5 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for EPAM Systems and 11 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat EPAM Systems' score of 0.52 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment EPAM Systems 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Formula Systems (1985) 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer FORTY or KD?

Kyndryl has a consensus price target of $16.50, suggesting a potential upside of 24.91%. Given Kyndryl's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kyndryl is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Formula Systems (1985) 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Kyndryl 3 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67

Does the media refer more to FORTY or KD?

In the previous week, Formula Systems (1985) had 7 more articles in the media than Kyndryl. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Formula Systems (1985) and 4 mentions for Kyndryl. Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Kyndryl's score of 0.66 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Formula Systems (1985) 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Kyndryl 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer GLOB or FORTY?

Globant presently has a consensus target price of $46.38, indicating a potential upside of 14.28%. Given Globant's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Globant is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Globant 2 Sell rating(s) 11 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.17 Formula Systems (1985) 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has better earnings & valuation, GLOB or FORTY?

Formula Systems (1985) has higher revenue and earnings than Globant. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Globant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Globant $2.45B 0.72 $102.92M $2.55 15.91 Formula Systems (1985) $2.63B 0.73 $606.48M $39.83 3.16

Does the media favor GLOB or FORTY?

In the previous week, Globant had 4 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Globant and 11 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Globant's score of 0.27 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Globant 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Formula Systems (1985) 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend FORTY or DXC?

DXC Technology has a consensus price target of $12.21, suggesting a potential upside of 8.67%. Given DXC Technology's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe DXC Technology is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Formula Systems (1985) 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 DXC Technology 2 Sell rating(s) 7 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.78

Does the media prefer FORTY or DXC?

In the previous week, Formula Systems (1985) had 7 more articles in the media than DXC Technology. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Formula Systems (1985) and 4 mentions for DXC Technology. DXC Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Formula Systems (1985)'s score of 0.81 indicating that DXC Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Formula Systems (1985) 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive DXC Technology 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) Competitors

$125.72 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 08/28/2026

Compare

FORTY vs. DOX, EPAM, KD, GLOB, and DXC

Should you buy Formula Systems (1985) stock or one of its competitors? Formula Systems (1985)'s main competitors and comparable companies include Amdocs (DOX), EPAM Systems (EPAM), Kyndryl (KD), Globant (GLOB), and DXC Technology (DXC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "it consulting & other services" industry.

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Amdocs?

Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) and Amdocs (NASDAQ:DOX) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Amdocs had 9 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Amdocs and 11 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Amdocs' score of 0.35 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Formula Systems (1985)	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Amdocs	2 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Amdocs has a consensus target price of $86.67, suggesting a potential upside of 37.76%. Given Amdocs' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Amdocs is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Formula Systems (1985)	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Amdocs	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29

Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amdocs has a beta of 0.4, indicating that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

Formula Systems (1985) pays an annual dividend of $0.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Amdocs pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Formula Systems (1985) pays out 1.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Amdocs pays out 54.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Amdocs has increased its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Amdocs is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.57% compared to Amdocs' net margin of 9.75%. Amdocs' return on equity of 20.28% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Formula Systems (1985)	21.57%	4.38%	2.13%
Amdocs	9.75%	20.28%	10.94%

34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.0% of Amdocs shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.4% of Amdocs shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Formula Systems (1985) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Amdocs. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amdocs, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Formula Systems (1985)	$2.63B	0.73	$606.48M	$39.83	3.16
Amdocs	$4.53B	1.50	$564.70M	$4.20	14.98

Summary

Amdocs beats Formula Systems (1985) on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to EPAM Systems?

EPAM Systems (NYSE:EPAM) and Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.57% compared to EPAM Systems' net margin of 7.15%. EPAM Systems' return on equity of 15.84% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
EPAM Systems	7.15%	15.84%	11.95%
Formula Systems (1985)	21.57%	4.38%	2.13%

Formula Systems (1985) has lower revenue, but higher earnings than EPAM Systems. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EPAM Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
EPAM Systems	$5.46B	1.09	$377.68M	$7.38	15.56
Formula Systems (1985)	$2.63B	0.73	$606.48M	$39.83	3.16

EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

EPAM Systems currently has a consensus price target of $116.47, indicating a potential upside of 1.40%. Given EPAM Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe EPAM Systems is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
EPAM Systems	1 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29
Formula Systems (1985)	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, EPAM Systems had 5 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for EPAM Systems and 11 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat EPAM Systems' score of 0.52 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
EPAM Systems	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Formula Systems (1985)	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

91.6% of EPAM Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of EPAM Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

EPAM Systems beats Formula Systems (1985) on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Kyndryl?

Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) and Kyndryl (NYSE:KD) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Formula Systems (1985) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kyndryl. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kyndryl, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Formula Systems (1985)	$2.63B	0.73	$606.48M	$39.83	3.16
Kyndryl	$15.09B	0.19	$199M	$0.37	35.70

Kyndryl has a consensus price target of $16.50, suggesting a potential upside of 24.91%. Given Kyndryl's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kyndryl is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Formula Systems (1985)	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Kyndryl	3 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.57% compared to Kyndryl's net margin of 0.58%. Kyndryl's return on equity of 12.24% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Formula Systems (1985)	21.57%	4.38%	2.13%
Kyndryl	0.58%	12.24%	1.33%

34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.5% of Kyndryl shares are held by institutional investors. 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Kyndryl shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kyndryl has a beta of 1.65, meaning that its share price is 65% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Formula Systems (1985) had 7 more articles in the media than Kyndryl. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Formula Systems (1985) and 4 mentions for Kyndryl. Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Kyndryl's score of 0.66 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Formula Systems (1985)	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Kyndryl	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Formula Systems (1985) beats Kyndryl on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Globant?

Globant (NYSE:GLOB) and Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Formula Systems (1985) has higher revenue and earnings than Globant. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Globant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Globant	$2.45B	0.72	$102.92M	$2.55	15.91
Formula Systems (1985)	$2.63B	0.73	$606.48M	$39.83	3.16

Globant presently has a consensus target price of $46.38, indicating a potential upside of 14.28%. Given Globant's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Globant is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Globant	2 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17
Formula Systems (1985)	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Globant had 4 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Globant and 11 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Globant's score of 0.27 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Globant	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Formula Systems (1985)	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

91.6% of Globant shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Globant shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Globant has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.57% compared to Globant's net margin of 4.63%. Globant's return on equity of 9.28% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Globant	4.63%	9.28%	6.18%
Formula Systems (1985)	21.57%	4.38%	2.13%

Summary

Globant and Formula Systems (1985) tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to DXC Technology?

Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) and DXC Technology (NYSE:DXC) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DXC Technology has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

DXC Technology has a consensus price target of $12.21, suggesting a potential upside of 8.67%. Given DXC Technology's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe DXC Technology is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Formula Systems (1985)	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
DXC Technology	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.78

Formula Systems (1985) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DXC Technology. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DXC Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Formula Systems (1985)	$2.63B	0.73	$606.48M	$39.83	3.16
DXC Technology	$12.48B	0.14	$18M	$0.70	16.06

In the previous week, Formula Systems (1985) had 7 more articles in the media than DXC Technology. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Formula Systems (1985) and 4 mentions for DXC Technology. DXC Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Formula Systems (1985)'s score of 0.81 indicating that DXC Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Formula Systems (1985)	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
DXC Technology	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Formula Systems (1985) pays an annual dividend of $0.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. DXC Technology pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. Formula Systems (1985) pays out 1.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. DXC Technology pays out 120.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.2% of DXC Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of DXC Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.57% compared to DXC Technology's net margin of 0.99%. DXC Technology's return on equity of 15.60% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Formula Systems (1985)	21.57%	4.38%	2.13%
DXC Technology	0.99%	15.60%	3.94%

Summary

Formula Systems (1985) beats DXC Technology on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Formula Systems (1985) News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FORTY and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FORTY vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Formula Systems (1985)	IT Services Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$1.93B	$11.14B	$30.04B	$12.95B
Dividend Yield	0.59%	2.77%	2.74%	11.02%
P/E Ratio	3.16	14.33	76.47	25.45
Price / Sales	0.73	56.76	594.05	95.63
Price / Cash	10.20	43.20	50.26	54.21
Price / Book	1.16	25.14	9.31	6.14
Net Income	$606.48M	$271.39M	$678.22M	$348.86M
7 Day Performance	8.18%	-0.21%	-0.07%	-0.80%
1 Month Performance	16.30%	6.47%	6.28%	5.56%
1 Year Performance	1.69%	29.51%	187.09%	15.57%

Formula Systems (1985) Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FORTY Formula Systems (1985)	1.4444 of 5 stars	$125.72 flat	N/A	-2.6%	$1.93B	$2.63B	3.16	19,337	Earnings Report Dividend Announcement Analyst Forecast Short Interest Increase
DOX Amdocs	4.717 of 5 stars	$62.31 +0.3%	$86.67 +39.1%	-25.6%	$6.70B	$4.53B	14.84	26,969	Trending News Analyst Upgrade Analyst Revision
EPAM EPAM Systems	2.9249 of 5 stars	$112.01 +0.7%	$116.47 +4.0%	-34.1%	$5.74B	$5.46B	15.18	62,850	Positive News Analyst Downgrade Analyst Revision
KD Kyndryl	3.7241 of 5 stars	$13.02 +2.1%	$16.50 +26.8%	-58.1%	$2.78B	$15.09B	35.18	72,000
GLOB Globant	3.8996 of 5 stars	$40.02 +1.1%	$46.38 +15.9%	-39.9%	$1.74B	$2.45B	15.69	28,773	Insider Trade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FORTY) was last updated on 8/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) Competitors

FORTY vs. DOX, EPAM, KD, GLOB, and DXC

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Amdocs?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to EPAM Systems?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Kyndryl?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Globant?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to DXC Technology?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FORTY vs. The Competition

Formula Systems (1985) Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) Competitors

FORTY vs. DOX, EPAM, KD, GLOB, and DXC

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Amdocs?

Does the media prefer FORTY or DOX?

Do analysts recommend FORTY or DOX?

Which has more volatility & risk, FORTY or DOX?

Is FORTY or DOX a better dividend stock?

Is FORTY or DOX more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of FORTY or DOX?

Which has better earnings and valuation, FORTY or DOX?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to EPAM Systems?

Is EPAM or FORTY more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, EPAM or FORTY?

Which has more risk and volatility, EPAM or FORTY?

Do analysts rate EPAM or FORTY?

Does the media favor EPAM or FORTY?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in EPAM or FORTY?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Kyndryl?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, FORTY or KD?

Do analysts prefer FORTY or KD?

Is FORTY or KD more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in FORTY or KD?

Which has more volatility and risk, FORTY or KD?

Does the media refer more to FORTY or KD?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Globant?

Which has better earnings & valuation, GLOB or FORTY?

Do analysts prefer GLOB or FORTY?

Does the media favor GLOB or FORTY?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in GLOB or FORTY?

Which has more risk & volatility, GLOB or FORTY?

Is GLOB or FORTY more profitable?

Summary

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to DXC Technology?

Which has more volatility & risk, FORTY or DXC?

Do analysts recommend FORTY or DXC?

Which has better valuation & earnings, FORTY or DXC?

Does the media prefer FORTY or DXC?

Is FORTY or DXC a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of FORTY or DXC?

Is FORTY or DXC more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FORTY vs. The Competition

Formula Systems (1985) Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools