Go Pro

Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY) Competitors

Formula Systems (1985) logo
$108.75 +4.25 (+4.07%)
As of 08/7/2026 03:39 PM Eastern

FORTY vs. PCTY, MBLY, NAVN, BZ, and GLBE

Should you buy Formula Systems (1985) stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Formula Systems (1985) with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Formula Systems (1985) include Paylocity (PCTY), Mobileye Global (MBLY), Navan (NAVN), KANZHUN (BZ), and Global-e Online (GLBE).

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Paylocity?

Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) and Paylocity (NASDAQ:PCTY) are related companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Paylocity had 25 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Paylocity and 0 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Paylocity's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Formula Systems (1985)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Paylocity is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Formula Systems (1985) Neutral
Paylocity Positive

Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Paylocity has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

Paylocity has a consensus target price of $160.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.37%. Given Paylocity's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Paylocity is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Formula Systems (1985)
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Paylocity
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.65

Formula Systems (1985) has higher revenue and earnings than Paylocity. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Paylocity, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Formula Systems (1985)$2.63B0.63$606.48M$39.312.77
Paylocity$1.77B4.51$227.13M$4.9530.39

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.58% compared to Paylocity's net margin of 15.23%. Paylocity's return on equity of 27.02% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Formula Systems (1985)21.58% 4.01% 1.94%
Paylocity 15.23%27.02%5.78%

34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.8% of Paylocity shares are held by institutional investors. 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of Paylocity shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Paylocity beats Formula Systems (1985) on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Mobileye Global?

Mobileye Global (NASDAQ:MBLY) and Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) are related companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

Mobileye Global has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.58% compared to Mobileye Global's net margin of -201.49%. Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity of 4.01% beat Mobileye Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mobileye Global-201.49% 0.70% 0.67%
Formula Systems (1985) 21.58%4.01%1.94%

Formula Systems (1985) has higher revenue and earnings than Mobileye Global. Mobileye Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Formula Systems (1985), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mobileye Global$1.89B3.87-$392M-$4.99N/A
Formula Systems (1985)$2.63B0.63$606.48M$39.312.77

In the previous week, Mobileye Global had 5 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Mobileye Global and 0 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Mobileye Global's average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat Formula Systems (1985)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Mobileye Global is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mobileye Global Positive
Formula Systems (1985) Neutral

Mobileye Global currently has a consensus target price of $12.64, indicating a potential upside of 44.75%. Given Mobileye Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Mobileye Global is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mobileye Global
2 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.48
Formula Systems (1985)
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

13.3% of Mobileye Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by institutional investors. 10.0% of Mobileye Global shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Formula Systems (1985) beats Mobileye Global on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Navan?

Navan (NASDAQ:NAVN) and Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and risk.

In the previous week, Navan had 6 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Navan and 0 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Navan's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Formula Systems (1985)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Navan is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Navan Neutral
Formula Systems (1985) Neutral

Formula Systems (1985) has higher revenue and earnings than Navan. Navan is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Formula Systems (1985), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Navan$765.04M9.67-$398.03M-$2.15N/A
Formula Systems (1985)$2.63B0.63$606.48M$39.312.77

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.58% compared to Navan's net margin of 0.00%. Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity of 4.01% beat Navan's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NavanN/A N/A N/A
Formula Systems (1985) 21.58%4.01%1.94%

Navan presently has a consensus price target of $29.07, indicating a potential downside of 0.03%. Given Navan's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Navan is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Navan
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88
Formula Systems (1985)
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by institutional investors. 63.4% of Navan shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Navan and Formula Systems (1985) tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to KANZHUN?

Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) and KANZHUN (NASDAQ:BZ) are related companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

KANZHUN has a consensus target price of $21.75, indicating a potential upside of 32.06%. Given KANZHUN's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe KANZHUN is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Formula Systems (1985)
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
KANZHUN
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

KANZHUN has a net margin of 40.21% compared to Formula Systems (1985)'s net margin of 21.58%. KANZHUN's return on equity of 15.19% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Formula Systems (1985)21.58% 4.01% 1.94%
KANZHUN 40.21%15.19%12.21%

34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.7% of KANZHUN shares are held by institutional investors. 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of KANZHUN shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Formula Systems (1985) has higher revenue and earnings than KANZHUN. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KANZHUN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Formula Systems (1985)$2.63B0.63$606.48M$39.312.77
KANZHUN$1.18B5.71$391.15M$1.0216.15

In the previous week, KANZHUN had 2 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for KANZHUN and 0 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat KANZHUN's score of -0.48 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Formula Systems (1985) Neutral
KANZHUN Neutral

Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KANZHUN has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

Formula Systems (1985) pays an annual dividend of $0.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. KANZHUN pays an annual dividend of $0.15 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Formula Systems (1985) pays out 1.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. KANZHUN pays out 14.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

KANZHUN beats Formula Systems (1985) on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Formula Systems (1985) compare to Global-e Online?

Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) and Global-e Online (NASDAQ:GLBE) are related companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.6% of Global-e Online shares are held by institutional investors. 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.6% of Global-e Online shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.58% compared to Global-e Online's net margin of 11.37%. Global-e Online's return on equity of 12.64% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Formula Systems (1985)21.58% 4.01% 1.94%
Global-e Online 11.37%12.64%8.86%

Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global-e Online has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Global-e Online had 20 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Global-e Online and 0 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Global-e Online's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Formula Systems (1985)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Global-e Online is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Formula Systems (1985) Neutral
Global-e Online Positive

Global-e Online has a consensus price target of $44.83, suggesting a potential upside of 5.94%. Given Global-e Online's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Global-e Online is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Formula Systems (1985)
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Global-e Online
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Formula Systems (1985) has higher revenue and earnings than Global-e Online. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global-e Online, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Formula Systems (1985)$2.63B0.63$606.48M$39.312.77
Global-e Online$1.02B7.01$68.27M$0.6565.11

Summary

Global-e Online beats Formula Systems (1985) on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Formula Systems (1985) News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FORTY and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FORTY and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FORTY vs. The Competition

MetricFormula Systems (1985)IT Services IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.67B$11.22B$30.08B$13.00B
Dividend Yield0.68%2.79%2.73%10.20%
P/E Ratio2.7714.5275.9325.19
Price / Sales0.6368.03602.2678.19
Price / Cash8.8243.5051.5050.72
Price / Book0.9424.539.286.22
Net Income$606.48M$273.10M$661.55M$342.66M
7 Day Performance0.68%3.62%4.84%4.41%
1 Month Performance-2.05%-0.02%-0.13%-1.10%
1 Year Performance3.01%33.71%203.19%23.99%

Formula Systems (1985) Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
1.7969 of 5 stars
$108.75
+4.1%
N/A+3.0%$1.67B$2.63B2.7719,337
PCTY
Paylocity
2.9948 of 5 stars
$138.68
+6.5%
$151.88
+9.5%
-15.0%$6.97B$1.60B29.576,700
MBLY
Mobileye Global
4.6517 of 5 stars
$8.43
+5.2%
$12.95
+53.7%
-35.8%$6.74B$1.89BN/A4,200
NAVN
Navan
1.8749 of 5 stars
$26.35
+2.2%
$29.07
+10.3%
N/A$6.56B$702.27MN/A3,700
BZ
KANZHUN
4.3575 of 5 stars
$15.82
+0.6%
$21.75
+37.5%
-21.9%$6.45B$1.18B15.514,884

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FORTY) was last updated on 8/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners