Go Pro

Q2 (QTWO) Competitors

Q2 logo
$62.81 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 08/7/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$62.81 +0.00 (+0.00%)
As of 08/7/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

QTWO vs. ACIW, ADSK, ALKT, BL, and NCNO

Should you buy Q2 stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Q2 with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Q2 include ACI Worldwide (ACIW), Autodesk (ADSK), Alkami Technology (ALKT), BlackLine (BL), and nCino (NCNO). These companies are all part of the "application software" industry.

How does Q2 compare to ACI Worldwide?

Q2 (NYSE:QTWO) and ACI Worldwide (NASDAQ:ACIW) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

ACI Worldwide has higher revenue and earnings than Q2. ACI Worldwide is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Q2$794.81M4.93$52.01M$1.4044.86
ACI Worldwide$1.76B3.08$226.66M$2.1824.62

ACI Worldwide has a net margin of 12.40% compared to Q2's net margin of 10.87%. ACI Worldwide's return on equity of 17.62% beat Q2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Q210.87% 17.04% 8.80%
ACI Worldwide 12.40%17.62%8.47%

Q2 currently has a consensus target price of $74.00, indicating a potential upside of 17.82%. ACI Worldwide has a consensus target price of $66.00, indicating a potential upside of 22.97%. Given ACI Worldwide's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ACI Worldwide is more favorable than Q2.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Q2
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
ACI Worldwide
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Q2 has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ACI Worldwide has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

94.7% of ACI Worldwide shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Q2 shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of ACI Worldwide shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ACI Worldwide had 10 more articles in the media than Q2. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for ACI Worldwide and 4 mentions for Q2. Q2's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat ACI Worldwide's score of 0.86 indicating that Q2 is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Q2
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ACI Worldwide
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

ACI Worldwide beats Q2 on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q2 compare to Autodesk?

Q2 (NYSE:QTWO) and Autodesk (NASDAQ:ADSK) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and media sentiment.

Autodesk has higher revenue and earnings than Q2. Autodesk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Q2$794.81M4.93$52.01M$1.4044.86
Autodesk$7.21B7.29$1.12B$6.8636.31

Q2 has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Autodesk has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Autodesk had 10 more articles in the media than Q2. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Autodesk and 4 mentions for Q2. Autodesk's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Q2's score of 0.92 indicating that Autodesk is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Q2
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Autodesk
8 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Q2 presently has a consensus price target of $74.00, indicating a potential upside of 17.82%. Autodesk has a consensus price target of $323.40, indicating a potential upside of 29.84%. Given Autodesk's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Autodesk is more favorable than Q2.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Q2
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Autodesk
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
23 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91

Autodesk has a net margin of 19.49% compared to Q2's net margin of 10.87%. Autodesk's return on equity of 57.14% beat Q2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Q210.87% 17.04% 8.80%
Autodesk 19.49%57.14%14.57%

90.2% of Autodesk shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Q2 shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Autodesk shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Autodesk beats Q2 on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q2 compare to Alkami Technology?

Q2 (NYSE:QTWO) and Alkami Technology (NASDAQ:ALKT) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

In the previous week, Alkami Technology had 4 more articles in the media than Q2. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Alkami Technology and 4 mentions for Q2. Q2's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Alkami Technology's score of 0.80 indicating that Q2 is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Q2
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Alkami Technology
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Q2 has higher revenue and earnings than Alkami Technology. Alkami Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Q2$794.81M4.93$52.01M$1.4044.86
Alkami Technology$443.64M4.76-$47.65M-$0.42N/A

55.0% of Alkami Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Q2 shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.1% of Alkami Technology shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Q2 has a net margin of 10.87% compared to Alkami Technology's net margin of -9.21%. Q2's return on equity of 17.04% beat Alkami Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Q210.87% 17.04% 8.80%
Alkami Technology -9.21%-7.68%-3.32%

Q2 has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alkami Technology has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Q2 presently has a consensus target price of $74.00, indicating a potential upside of 17.82%. Alkami Technology has a consensus target price of $22.20, indicating a potential upside of 12.52%. Given Q2's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Q2 is more favorable than Alkami Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Q2
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Alkami Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29

Summary

Q2 beats Alkami Technology on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q2 compare to BlackLine?

Q2 (NYSE:QTWO) and BlackLine (NASDAQ:BL) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and media sentiment.

Q2 has higher revenue and earnings than BlackLine. Q2 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BlackLine, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Q2$794.81M4.93$52.01M$1.4044.86
BlackLine$700.43M2.45$24.17M$0.5751.84

Q2 has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BlackLine has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

95.1% of BlackLine shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Q2 shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of BlackLine shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, BlackLine had 25 more articles in the media than Q2. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for BlackLine and 4 mentions for Q2. Q2's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat BlackLine's score of 0.46 indicating that Q2 is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Q2
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
BlackLine
7 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
12 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Q2 has a net margin of 10.87% compared to BlackLine's net margin of 4.75%. BlackLine's return on equity of 20.89% beat Q2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Q210.87% 17.04% 8.80%
BlackLine 4.75%20.89%4.19%

Q2 presently has a consensus price target of $74.00, indicating a potential upside of 17.82%. BlackLine has a consensus price target of $40.08, indicating a potential upside of 35.65%. Given BlackLine's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe BlackLine is more favorable than Q2.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Q2
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
BlackLine
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

Summary

Q2 beats BlackLine on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q2 compare to nCino?

Q2 (NYSE:QTWO) and nCino (NASDAQ:NCNO) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Q2 presently has a consensus price target of $74.00, suggesting a potential upside of 17.82%. nCino has a consensus price target of $25.29, suggesting a potential upside of 31.90%. Given nCino's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe nCino is more favorable than Q2.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Q2
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
nCino
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

In the previous week, nCino had 19 more articles in the media than Q2. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for nCino and 4 mentions for Q2. Q2's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat nCino's score of 0.48 indicating that Q2 is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Q2
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
nCino
12 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

94.8% of nCino shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Q2 shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of nCino shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Q2 has higher revenue and earnings than nCino. Q2 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than nCino, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Q2$794.81M4.93$52.01M$1.4044.86
nCino$594.78M3.53$5.18M$0.12159.75

Q2 has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, nCino has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Q2 has a net margin of 10.87% compared to nCino's net margin of 2.17%. Q2's return on equity of 17.04% beat nCino's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Q210.87% 17.04% 8.80%
nCino 2.17%6.85%4.39%

Summary

Q2 beats nCino on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Q2 News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for QTWO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QTWO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

QTWO vs. The Competition

MetricQ2Software IndustryTechnology SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.92B$15.72B$29.91B$24.11B
Dividend YieldN/A3.43%2.73%3.69%
P/E Ratio44.86126.9275.9629.19
Price / Sales4.931,297.63597.9213.07
Price / Cash23.8043.9150.5119.37
Price / Book5.948.408.174.91
Net Income$52.01M$437.06M$679.76M$1.06B
7 Day Performance0.57%2.40%3.12%1.65%
1 Month Performance21.26%1.87%0.31%2.63%
1 Year Performance-14.71%9.03%203.18%20.40%

Q2 Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
QTWO
Q2
4.2429 of 5 stars
$62.81
0.0%
$74.00
+17.8%
-14.7%$3.92B$794.81M44.862,549
ACIW
ACI Worldwide
4.089 of 5 stars
$52.90
-4.2%
$64.00
+21.0%
+20.5%$5.38B$1.76B26.592,930
ADSK
Autodesk
4.8826 of 5 stars
$249.16
+2.8%
$323.40
+29.8%
-14.3%$52.58B$7.21B36.3214,300
ALKT
Alkami Technology
3.9705 of 5 stars
$19.68
0.0%
$22.20
+12.8%
-1.9%$2.11B$443.64MN/A1,225
BL
BlackLine
4.3959 of 5 stars
$29.87
-0.4%
$40.08
+34.2%
-38.9%$1.75B$700.43M52.331,850

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:QTWO) was last updated on 8/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners