Which has higher earnings & valuation, QTWO or ALKT?

Q2 has higher revenue and earnings than Alkami Technology. Alkami Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Q2 $794.81M 3.49 $52.01M $1.12 39.55 Alkami Technology $443.64M 3.70 -$47.65M -$0.47 N/A

Is QTWO or ALKT more profitable?

Q2 has a net margin of 8.99% compared to Alkami Technology's net margin of -10.55%. Q2's return on equity of 14.68% beat Alkami Technology's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Q2 8.99% 14.68% 6.83% Alkami Technology -10.55% -8.91% -3.79%

Does the media refer more to QTWO or ALKT?

In the previous week, Q2 had 3 more articles in the media than Alkami Technology. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Q2 and 5 mentions for Alkami Technology. Alkami Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Q2's score of 0.10 indicating that Alkami Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Q2 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Alkami Technology 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, QTWO or NCNO?

Q2 has higher revenue and earnings than nCino. Q2 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than nCino, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Q2 $794.81M 3.49 $52.01M $1.12 39.55 nCino $594.78M 2.86 $5.18M $0.12 129.36

Is QTWO or NCNO more profitable?

Q2 has a net margin of 8.99% compared to nCino's net margin of 2.17%. Q2's return on equity of 14.68% beat nCino's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Q2 8.99% 14.68% 6.83% nCino 2.17% 6.85% 4.39%

Does the media refer more to QTWO or NCNO?

In the previous week, Q2 and Q2 both had 8 articles in the media. nCino's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Q2's score of 0.10 indicating that nCino is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Q2 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral nCino 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate QTWO or FIG?

Q2 presently has a consensus price target of $75.27, indicating a potential upside of 69.92%. Figma has a consensus price target of $38.63, indicating a potential upside of 88.12%. Given Figma's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Figma is more favorable than Q2. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Q2 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 7 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.70 Figma 1 Sell rating(s) 10 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.20

Which has higher earnings and valuation, QTWO or FIG?

Q2 has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Figma. Figma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Q2 $794.81M 3.49 $52.01M $1.12 39.55 Figma $1.16B 7.88 -$1.25B -$3.43 N/A

Is QTWO or FIG more profitable?

Q2 has a net margin of 8.99% compared to Figma's net margin of -123.83%. Q2's return on equity of 14.68% beat Figma's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Q2 8.99% 14.68% 6.83% Figma -123.83% -98.51% -61.42%

Does the media prefer QTWO or FIG?

In the previous week, Figma had 6 more articles in the media than Q2. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Figma and 8 mentions for Q2. Figma's average media sentiment score of 0.18 beat Q2's score of 0.10 indicating that Figma is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Q2 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Figma 4 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better valuation and earnings, GDDY or QTWO?

GoDaddy has higher revenue and earnings than Q2. GoDaddy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio GoDaddy $4.95B 2.18 $875M $6.32 12.93 Q2 $794.81M 3.49 $52.01M $1.12 39.55

Is GDDY or QTWO more profitable?

GoDaddy has a net margin of 17.32% compared to Q2's net margin of 8.99%. GoDaddy's return on equity of 366.90% beat Q2's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets GoDaddy 17.32% 366.90% 10.73% Q2 8.99% 14.68% 6.83%

Does the media prefer GDDY or QTWO?

In the previous week, GoDaddy had 16 more articles in the media than Q2. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for GoDaddy and 8 mentions for Q2. GoDaddy's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Q2's score of 0.10 indicating that GoDaddy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment GoDaddy 15 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Q2 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, QTWO or HUBS?

Q2 has higher earnings, but lower revenue than HubSpot. Q2 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HubSpot, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Q2 $794.81M 3.49 $52.01M $1.12 39.55 HubSpot $3.13B 3.22 $45.91M $1.91 103.05

Is QTWO or HUBS more profitable?

Q2 has a net margin of 8.99% compared to HubSpot's net margin of 3.04%. Q2's return on equity of 14.68% beat HubSpot's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Q2 8.99% 14.68% 6.83% HubSpot 3.04% 5.66% 3.04%

Does the media favor QTWO or HUBS?

In the previous week, HubSpot had 18 more articles in the media than Q2. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for HubSpot and 8 mentions for Q2. HubSpot's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Q2's score of 0.10 indicating that HubSpot is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Q2 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral HubSpot 12 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Q2 (QTWO) Competitors

$44.30 -0.52 (-1.16%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$44.36 +0.07 (+0.15%)

As of 04:05 PM Eastern

Compare

QTWO vs. ALKT, NCNO, FIG, GDDY, and HUBS

Should you buy Q2 stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Q2 with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Q2 include Alkami Technology (ALKT), nCino (NCNO), Figma (FIG), GoDaddy (GDDY), and HubSpot (HUBS). These companies are all part of the "computer software" industry.

How does Q2 compare to Alkami Technology?

Q2 (NYSE:QTWO) and Alkami Technology (NASDAQ:ALKT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

Q2 has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alkami Technology has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Q2 has higher revenue and earnings than Alkami Technology. Alkami Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Q2	$794.81M	3.49	$52.01M	$1.12	39.55
Alkami Technology	$443.64M	3.70	-$47.65M	-$0.47	N/A

In the previous week, Q2 had 3 more articles in the media than Alkami Technology. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Q2 and 5 mentions for Alkami Technology. Alkami Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Q2's score of 0.10 indicating that Alkami Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Q2	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Alkami Technology	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Q2 currently has a consensus price target of $75.27, suggesting a potential upside of 69.92%. Alkami Technology has a consensus price target of $22.80, suggesting a potential upside of 48.67%. Given Q2's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Q2 is more favorable than Alkami Technology.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Q2	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70
Alkami Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29

55.0% of Alkami Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Q2 shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.1% of Alkami Technology shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Q2 has a net margin of 8.99% compared to Alkami Technology's net margin of -10.55%. Q2's return on equity of 14.68% beat Alkami Technology's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Q2	8.99%	14.68%	6.83%
Alkami Technology	-10.55%	-8.91%	-3.79%

Summary

Q2 beats Alkami Technology on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q2 compare to nCino?

Q2 (NYSE:QTWO) and nCino (NASDAQ:NCNO) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

Q2 has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, nCino has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Q2 and Q2 both had 8 articles in the media. nCino's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Q2's score of 0.10 indicating that nCino is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Q2	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
nCino	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Q2 has a net margin of 8.99% compared to nCino's net margin of 2.17%. Q2's return on equity of 14.68% beat nCino's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Q2	8.99%	14.68%	6.83%
nCino	2.17%	6.85%	4.39%

94.8% of nCino shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Q2 shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of nCino shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Q2 currently has a consensus price target of $75.27, suggesting a potential upside of 69.92%. nCino has a consensus price target of $25.21, suggesting a potential upside of 62.43%. Given Q2's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Q2 is more favorable than nCino.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Q2	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70
nCino	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.74

Q2 has higher revenue and earnings than nCino. Q2 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than nCino, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Q2	$794.81M	3.49	$52.01M	$1.12	39.55
nCino	$594.78M	2.86	$5.18M	$0.12	129.36

Summary

Q2 beats nCino on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q2 compare to Figma?

Q2 (NYSE:QTWO) and Figma (NYSE:FIG) are both mid-cap computer software companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings and media sentiment.

Q2 has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Figma. Figma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Q2	$794.81M	3.49	$52.01M	$1.12	39.55
Figma	$1.16B	7.88	-$1.25B	-$3.43	N/A

In the previous week, Figma had 6 more articles in the media than Q2. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Figma and 8 mentions for Q2. Figma's average media sentiment score of 0.18 beat Q2's score of 0.10 indicating that Figma is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Q2	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Figma	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Q2 has a net margin of 8.99% compared to Figma's net margin of -123.83%. Q2's return on equity of 14.68% beat Figma's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Q2	8.99%	14.68%	6.83%
Figma	-123.83%	-98.51%	-61.42%

Q2 presently has a consensus price target of $75.27, indicating a potential upside of 69.92%. Figma has a consensus price target of $38.63, indicating a potential upside of 88.12%. Given Figma's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Figma is more favorable than Q2.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Q2	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70
Figma	1 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20

Summary

Q2 beats Figma on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q2 compare to GoDaddy?

GoDaddy (NYSE:GDDY) and Q2 (NYSE:QTWO) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, risk, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, GoDaddy had 16 more articles in the media than Q2. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for GoDaddy and 8 mentions for Q2. GoDaddy's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Q2's score of 0.10 indicating that GoDaddy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
GoDaddy	15 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Q2	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

GoDaddy has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Q2 has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

GoDaddy has higher revenue and earnings than Q2. GoDaddy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
GoDaddy	$4.95B	2.18	$875M	$6.32	12.93
Q2	$794.81M	3.49	$52.01M	$1.12	39.55

90.3% of GoDaddy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of GoDaddy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Q2 shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

GoDaddy has a net margin of 17.32% compared to Q2's net margin of 8.99%. GoDaddy's return on equity of 366.90% beat Q2's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
GoDaddy	17.32%	366.90%	10.73%
Q2	8.99%	14.68%	6.83%

GoDaddy presently has a consensus price target of $120.57, indicating a potential upside of 47.58%. Q2 has a consensus price target of $75.27, indicating a potential upside of 69.92%. Given Q2's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Q2 is more favorable than GoDaddy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
GoDaddy	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.53
Q2	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70

Summary

GoDaddy beats Q2 on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q2 compare to HubSpot?

Q2 (NYSE:QTWO) and HubSpot (NYSE:HUBS) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Q2 has a net margin of 8.99% compared to HubSpot's net margin of 3.04%. Q2's return on equity of 14.68% beat HubSpot's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Q2	8.99%	14.68%	6.83%
HubSpot	3.04%	5.66%	3.04%

90.4% of HubSpot shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Q2 shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of HubSpot shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Q2 has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HubSpot has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, HubSpot had 18 more articles in the media than Q2. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for HubSpot and 8 mentions for Q2. HubSpot's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Q2's score of 0.10 indicating that HubSpot is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Q2	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
HubSpot	12 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Q2 presently has a consensus price target of $75.27, indicating a potential upside of 69.92%. HubSpot has a consensus price target of $311.00, indicating a potential upside of 58.01%. Given Q2's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Q2 is more favorable than HubSpot.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Q2	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70
HubSpot	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	22 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Q2 has higher earnings, but lower revenue than HubSpot. Q2 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HubSpot, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Q2	$794.81M	3.49	$52.01M	$1.12	39.55
HubSpot	$3.13B	3.22	$45.91M	$1.91	103.05

Summary

Q2 and HubSpot tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Q2 News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QTWO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

QTWO vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Q2	INTERNET SOFTWARE Industry	Computer Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$2.77B	$16.75B	$38.51B	$23.06B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.07%	3.13%	4.10%
P/E Ratio	39.55	62.83	79.56	30.54
Price / Sales	3.49	36.86	631.40	12.85
Price / Cash	17.32	73.23	48.75	18.46
Price / Book	4.19	6.21	9.65	4.65
Net Income	$52.01M	$386.39M	$1.07B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-9.47%	-7.59%	-4.15%	-0.70%
1 Month Performance	-11.61%	0.87%	3.44%	0.07%
1 Year Performance	-51.32%	-9.50%	155.11%	21.50%

Q2 Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
QTWO Q2	4.3274 of 5 stars	$44.30 -1.2%	$75.27 +69.9%	-50.9%	$2.77B	$794.81M	39.55	2,549
ALKT Alkami Technology	4.2744 of 5 stars	$18.95 +4.3%	$22.80 +20.3%	-48.0%	$1.94B	$443.64M	N/A	1,225	Positive News Gap Down
NCNO nCino	3.9984 of 5 stars	$17.19 +6.9%	$25.21 +46.7%	-44.9%	$1.76B	$594.78M	143.25	1,684	Gap Up High Trading Volume
FIG Figma	3.1805 of 5 stars	$27.12 +6.4%	$38.63 +42.4%	N/A	$11.36B	$1.06B	N/A	1,886
GDDY GoDaddy	4.8257 of 5 stars	$93.17 +8.6%	$120.57 +29.4%	-55.9%	$11.36B	$5.02B	14.74	5,845	News Coverage

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:QTWO) was last updated on 6/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Q2 (QTWO) Competitors

QTWO vs. ALKT, NCNO, FIG, GDDY, and HUBS

How does Q2 compare to Alkami Technology?

Summary

How does Q2 compare to nCino?

Summary

How does Q2 compare to Figma?

Summary

How does Q2 compare to GoDaddy?

Summary

How does Q2 compare to HubSpot?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

QTWO vs. The Competition

Q2 Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Q2 (QTWO) Competitors

QTWO vs. ALKT, NCNO, FIG, GDDY, and HUBS

How does Q2 compare to Alkami Technology?

Which has more risk & volatility, QTWO or ALKT?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, QTWO or ALKT?

Does the media refer more to QTWO or ALKT?

Do analysts prefer QTWO or ALKT?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of QTWO or ALKT?

Is QTWO or ALKT more profitable?

Summary

How does Q2 compare to nCino?

Which has more volatility and risk, QTWO or NCNO?

Does the media refer more to QTWO or NCNO?

Is QTWO or NCNO more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in QTWO or NCNO?

Do analysts prefer QTWO or NCNO?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, QTWO or NCNO?

Summary

How does Q2 compare to Figma?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, QTWO or FIG?

Does the media prefer QTWO or FIG?

Is QTWO or FIG more profitable?

Do analysts rate QTWO or FIG?

Summary

How does Q2 compare to GoDaddy?

Does the media prefer GDDY or QTWO?

Which has more risk & volatility, GDDY or QTWO?

Which has better valuation and earnings, GDDY or QTWO?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in GDDY or QTWO?

Is GDDY or QTWO more profitable?

Do analysts rate GDDY or QTWO?

Summary

How does Q2 compare to HubSpot?

Is QTWO or HUBS more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in QTWO or HUBS?

Which has more volatility & risk, QTWO or HUBS?

Does the media favor QTWO or HUBS?

Do analysts prefer QTWO or HUBS?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, QTWO or HUBS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

QTWO vs. The Competition

Q2 Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools