Go Pro

Q2 (QTWO) Competitors

Q2 logo
$48.10 +0.94 (+2.00%)
As of 03:20 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

QTWO vs. ALKT, NCNO, GDDY, FROG, and TEM

Should you buy Q2 stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Q2 with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Q2 include Alkami Technology (ALKT), nCino (NCNO), GoDaddy (GDDY), JFrog (FROG), and Tempus AI (TEM). These companies are all part of the "computer software" industry.

How does Q2 compare to Alkami Technology?

Q2 (NYSE:QTWO) and Alkami Technology (NASDAQ:ALKT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Q2 has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alkami Technology has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Q2 has a net margin of 8.99% compared to Alkami Technology's net margin of -10.55%. Q2's return on equity of 14.68% beat Alkami Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Q28.99% 14.68% 6.83%
Alkami Technology -10.55%-8.91%-3.79%

Q2 currently has a consensus target price of $73.45, suggesting a potential upside of 52.70%. Alkami Technology has a consensus target price of $22.20, suggesting a potential upside of 24.16%. Given Q2's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Q2 is more favorable than Alkami Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Q2
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70
Alkami Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29

55.0% of Alkami Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Q2 shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.1% of Alkami Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Alkami Technology had 2 more articles in the media than Q2. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Alkami Technology and 4 mentions for Q2. Alkami Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Q2's score of 0.24 indicating that Alkami Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Q2
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Alkami Technology
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Q2 has higher revenue and earnings than Alkami Technology. Alkami Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Q2$794.81M3.79$52.01M$1.1242.95
Alkami Technology$471.94M4.05-$47.65M-$0.47N/A

Summary

Q2 beats Alkami Technology on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q2 compare to nCino?

nCino (NASDAQ:NCNO) and Q2 (NYSE:QTWO) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, nCino had 2 more articles in the media than Q2. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for nCino and 4 mentions for Q2. nCino's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Q2's score of 0.24 indicating that nCino is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
nCino
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Q2
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Q2 has higher revenue and earnings than nCino. Q2 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than nCino, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
nCino$594.78M3.00$5.18M$0.12135.51
Q2$794.81M3.79$52.01M$1.1242.95

94.8% of nCino shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of nCino shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Q2 shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Q2 has a net margin of 8.99% compared to nCino's net margin of 2.17%. Q2's return on equity of 14.68% beat nCino's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
nCino2.17% 6.85% 4.39%
Q2 8.99%14.68%6.83%

nCino has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Q2 has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

nCino currently has a consensus target price of $25.29, suggesting a potential upside of 55.50%. Q2 has a consensus target price of $73.45, suggesting a potential upside of 52.70%. Given nCino's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe nCino is more favorable than Q2.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
nCino
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.74
Q2
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70

Summary

nCino beats Q2 on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q2 compare to GoDaddy?

GoDaddy (NYSE:GDDY) and Q2 (NYSE:QTWO) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

GoDaddy has higher revenue and earnings than Q2. GoDaddy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GoDaddy$4.95B2.27$875M$6.3213.42
Q2$794.81M3.79$52.01M$1.1242.95

In the previous week, GoDaddy had 12 more articles in the media than Q2. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for GoDaddy and 4 mentions for Q2. GoDaddy's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Q2's score of 0.24 indicating that GoDaddy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
GoDaddy
3 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Q2
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

90.3% of GoDaddy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of GoDaddy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Q2 shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

GoDaddy currently has a consensus target price of $118.43, indicating a potential upside of 39.59%. Q2 has a consensus target price of $73.45, indicating a potential upside of 52.70%. Given Q2's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Q2 is more favorable than GoDaddy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GoDaddy
0 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53
Q2
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70

GoDaddy has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Q2 has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

GoDaddy has a net margin of 17.32% compared to Q2's net margin of 8.99%. GoDaddy's return on equity of 366.90% beat Q2's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GoDaddy17.32% 366.90% 10.73%
Q2 8.99%14.68%6.83%

Summary

GoDaddy beats Q2 on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q2 compare to JFrog?

Q2 (NYSE:QTWO) and JFrog (NASDAQ:FROG) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

Q2 has a net margin of 8.99% compared to JFrog's net margin of -10.93%. Q2's return on equity of 14.68% beat JFrog's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Q28.99% 14.68% 6.83%
JFrog -10.93%-4.61%-3.11%

Q2 presently has a consensus price target of $73.45, suggesting a potential upside of 52.70%. JFrog has a consensus price target of $81.62, suggesting a potential downside of 11.38%. Given Q2's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Q2 is more favorable than JFrog.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Q2
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70
JFrog
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
21 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87

In the previous week, JFrog had 8 more articles in the media than Q2. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for JFrog and 4 mentions for Q2. JFrog's average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Q2's score of 0.24 indicating that JFrog is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Q2
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
JFrog
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

85.0% of JFrog shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Q2 shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.8% of JFrog shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Q2 has higher revenue and earnings than JFrog. JFrog is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Q2$794.81M3.79$52.01M$1.1242.95
JFrog$563.41M19.80-$71.82M-$0.53N/A

Q2 has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JFrog has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Q2 beats JFrog on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q2 compare to Tempus AI?

Q2 (NYSE:QTWO) and Tempus AI (NASDAQ:TEM) are both computer software companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

24.2% of Tempus AI shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Q2 shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 24.3% of Tempus AI shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Q2 has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tempus AI. Tempus AI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Q2$794.81M3.79$52.01M$1.1242.95
Tempus AI$1.36B7.67-$245.03M-$1.72N/A

Q2 has a net margin of 8.99% compared to Tempus AI's net margin of -22.20%. Q2's return on equity of 14.68% beat Tempus AI's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Q28.99% 14.68% 6.83%
Tempus AI -22.20%-53.83%-11.17%

In the previous week, Tempus AI had 20 more articles in the media than Q2. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Tempus AI and 4 mentions for Q2. Tempus AI's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Q2's score of 0.24 indicating that Tempus AI is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Q2
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Tempus AI
7 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Q2 currently has a consensus target price of $73.45, suggesting a potential upside of 52.70%. Tempus AI has a consensus target price of $68.54, suggesting a potential upside of 17.69%. Given Q2's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Q2 is more favorable than Tempus AI.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Q2
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70
Tempus AI
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Q2 has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tempus AI has a beta of 3.64, suggesting that its stock price is 264% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Q2 and Tempus AI tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Q2 News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for QTWO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QTWO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

QTWO vs. The Competition

MetricQ2INTERNET SOFTWARE IndustryComputer SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.02B$16.26B$38.96B$23.44B
Dividend YieldN/A3.49%3.31%4.07%
P/E Ratio43.0265.6980.7631.94
Price / Sales3.7942.30623.26113.93
Price / Cash18.1570.0246.0018.60
Price / Book4.556.649.894.81
Net Income$52.01M$385.01M$1.07B$1.07B
7 Day Performance11.48%3.67%2.41%1.52%
1 Month Performance1.29%-5.53%0.20%0.82%
1 Year Performance-48.52%-7.24%160.35%26.20%

Q2 Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
QTWO
Q2
3.7414 of 5 stars
$48.10
+2.0%
$73.45
+52.7%
-49.9%$3.02B$794.81M43.022,549
ALKT
Alkami Technology
4.1869 of 5 stars
$14.59
-0.6%
$22.20
+52.2%
-42.8%$1.57B$443.64MN/A1,225
NCNO
nCino
4.0752 of 5 stars
$14.59
-1.4%
$25.29
+73.3%
-42.9%$1.62B$594.78M121.581,684
GDDY
GoDaddy
4.9802 of 5 stars
$75.03
-2.6%
$118.43
+57.8%
-52.7%$10.20B$5.02B11.875,845
FROG
JFrog
2.209 of 5 stars
$79.89
-3.4%
$79.95
+0.1%
+105.2%$10.02B$531.84MN/A1,800

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:QTWO) was last updated on 6/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners