Go Pro

Q2 (QTWO) Competitors

Q2 logo
$55.55 +0.69 (+1.26%)
Closing price 07/20/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$55.58 +0.03 (+0.05%)
As of 07/20/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

QTWO vs. ALKT, NCNO, DT, PINS, and AUR

Should you buy Q2 stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Q2 with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Q2 include Alkami Technology (ALKT), nCino (NCNO), Dynatrace (DT), Pinterest (PINS), and Aurora Innovation (AUR). These companies are all part of the "computer software" industry.

How does Q2 compare to Alkami Technology?

Q2 (NYSE:QTWO) and Alkami Technology (NASDAQ:ALKT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment and risk.

In the previous week, Q2 had 5 more articles in the media than Alkami Technology. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Q2 and 3 mentions for Alkami Technology. Q2's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Alkami Technology's score of 0.78 indicating that Q2 is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Q2
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Alkami Technology
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Q2 has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Alkami Technology has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

55.0% of Alkami Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Q2 shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.1% of Alkami Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Q2 currently has a consensus target price of $73.45, suggesting a potential upside of 32.23%. Alkami Technology has a consensus target price of $22.20, suggesting a potential upside of 23.40%. Given Q2's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Q2 is more favorable than Alkami Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Q2
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70
Alkami Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29

Q2 has higher revenue and earnings than Alkami Technology. Alkami Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Q2$794.81M4.38$52.01M$1.1249.60
Alkami Technology$443.64M4.34-$47.65M-$0.47N/A

Q2 has a net margin of 8.99% compared to Alkami Technology's net margin of -10.55%. Q2's return on equity of 14.68% beat Alkami Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Q28.99% 14.68% 6.83%
Alkami Technology -10.55%-8.91%-3.79%

Summary

Q2 beats Alkami Technology on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q2 compare to nCino?

Q2 (NYSE:QTWO) and nCino (NASDAQ:NCNO) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Q2 had 5 more articles in the media than nCino. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Q2 and 3 mentions for nCino. nCino's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Q2's score of 1.05 indicating that nCino is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Q2
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
nCino
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Q2 presently has a consensus price target of $73.45, indicating a potential upside of 32.23%. nCino has a consensus price target of $25.29, indicating a potential upside of 41.02%. Given nCino's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe nCino is more favorable than Q2.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Q2
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70
nCino
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.74

Q2 has higher revenue and earnings than nCino. Q2 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than nCino, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Q2$794.81M4.38$52.01M$1.1249.60
nCino$594.78M3.30$5.18M$0.12149.42

Q2 has a net margin of 8.99% compared to nCino's net margin of 2.17%. Q2's return on equity of 14.68% beat nCino's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Q28.99% 14.68% 6.83%
nCino 2.17%6.85%4.39%

Q2 has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, nCino has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

94.8% of nCino shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Q2 shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of nCino shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Q2 beats nCino on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q2 compare to Dynatrace?

Dynatrace (NYSE:DT) and Q2 (NYSE:QTWO) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Dynatrace has higher revenue and earnings than Q2. Q2 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dynatrace, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dynatrace$2.02B6.43$162.67M$0.5482.82
Q2$794.81M4.38$52.01M$1.1249.60

Q2 has a net margin of 8.99% compared to Dynatrace's net margin of 8.06%. Q2's return on equity of 14.68% beat Dynatrace's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dynatrace8.06% 10.37% 6.74%
Q2 8.99%14.68%6.83%

Dynatrace has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Q2 has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

94.3% of Dynatrace shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Dynatrace shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Q2 shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dynatrace presently has a consensus price target of $48.88, suggesting a potential upside of 9.30%. Q2 has a consensus price target of $73.45, suggesting a potential upside of 32.23%. Given Q2's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Q2 is more favorable than Dynatrace.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Dynatrace
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
22 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Q2
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70

In the previous week, Dynatrace had 7 more articles in the media than Q2. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Dynatrace and 8 mentions for Q2. Dynatrace's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Q2's score of 1.05 indicating that Dynatrace is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Dynatrace
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Q2
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Dynatrace beats Q2 on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q2 compare to Pinterest?

Pinterest (NYSE:PINS) and Q2 (NYSE:QTWO) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Q2 has a net margin of 8.99% compared to Pinterest's net margin of 7.64%. Q2's return on equity of 14.68% beat Pinterest's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pinterest7.64% 8.26% 6.76%
Q2 8.99%14.68%6.83%

Pinterest has higher revenue and earnings than Q2. Pinterest is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pinterest$4.22B3.03$416.86M$0.4847.54
Q2$794.81M4.38$52.01M$1.1249.60

88.8% of Pinterest shares are held by institutional investors. 8.1% of Pinterest shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Q2 shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pinterest currently has a consensus price target of $27.66, indicating a potential upside of 21.23%. Q2 has a consensus price target of $73.45, indicating a potential upside of 32.23%. Given Q2's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Q2 is more favorable than Pinterest.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pinterest
1 Sell rating(s)
18 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44
Q2
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70

In the previous week, Pinterest had 8 more articles in the media than Q2. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Pinterest and 8 mentions for Q2. Q2's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Pinterest's score of 0.86 indicating that Q2 is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pinterest
9 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Q2
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Pinterest has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Q2 has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Q2 beats Pinterest on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q2 compare to Aurora Innovation?

Q2 (NYSE:QTWO) and Aurora Innovation (NASDAQ:AUR) are both computer software companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Q2 has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aurora Innovation has a beta of 2.63, meaning that its share price is 163% more volatile than the broader market.

44.7% of Aurora Innovation shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Q2 shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.5% of Aurora Innovation shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Q2 has a net margin of 8.99% compared to Aurora Innovation's net margin of -20,775.00%. Q2's return on equity of 14.68% beat Aurora Innovation's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Q28.99% 14.68% 6.83%
Aurora Innovation -20,775.00%-40.45%-36.66%

Q2 has higher revenue and earnings than Aurora Innovation. Aurora Innovation is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q2, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Q2$794.81M4.38$52.01M$1.1249.60
Aurora Innovation$3M3,981.24-$816M-$0.44N/A

Q2 currently has a consensus target price of $73.45, indicating a potential upside of 32.23%. Aurora Innovation has a consensus target price of $12.25, indicating a potential upside of 101.15%. Given Aurora Innovation's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Aurora Innovation is more favorable than Q2.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Q2
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70
Aurora Innovation
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.45

In the previous week, Q2 had 8 more articles in the media than Aurora Innovation. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Q2 and 0 mentions for Aurora Innovation. Aurora Innovation's average media sentiment score of 1.95 beat Q2's score of 1.05 indicating that Aurora Innovation is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Q2 Positive
Aurora Innovation Very Positive

Summary

Q2 beats Aurora Innovation on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Q2 News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for QTWO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QTWO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

QTWO vs. The Competition

MetricQ2INTERNET SOFTWARE IndustryComputer SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.43B$17.93B$37.81B$23.42B
Dividend YieldN/A1.71%3.15%4.16%
P/E Ratio49.6068.48168.4930.65
Price / Sales4.3835.81597.0220.36
Price / Cash20.7874.2843.5118.81
Price / Book5.256.669.264.74
Net Income$52.01M$385.08M$1.07B$1.07B
7 Day Performance6.74%-2.79%-2.13%-0.42%
1 Month Performance29.50%4.47%-1.75%0.69%
1 Year Performance-38.33%-15.52%134.96%16.45%

Q2 Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
QTWO
Q2
4.0377 of 5 stars
$55.55
+1.3%
$73.45
+32.2%
-38.9%$3.43B$794.81M49.602,549
ALKT
Alkami Technology
4.3353 of 5 stars
$17.68
+1.9%
$22.20
+25.6%
-35.3%$1.86B$443.64MN/A1,225
NCNO
nCino
4.2988 of 5 stars
$17.40
+2.4%
$25.29
+45.3%
-41.4%$1.86B$594.78M145.001,684
DT
Dynatrace
3.9676 of 5 stars
$44.63
+2.2%
$48.27
+8.2%
-16.0%$12.73B$2.02B82.645,600
PINS
Pinterest
4.6697 of 5 stars
$22.60
+0.4%
$27.42
+21.3%
-38.7%$12.61B$4.22B47.085,265

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:QTWO) was last updated on 7/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners