Go Pro
→ Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture (From Altimetry) (Ad)tc pixel Free HYFM Stock Alerts

Hydrofarm Holdings Group (HYFM) Competitors

Hydrofarm Holdings Group logo
$0.70 -0.05 (-6.67%)
Closing price 07/14/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$0.72 +0.02 (+3.43%)
As of 04:00 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

HYFM vs. COSM, NHTC, TLIH, SCNX, and EDUC

Should you buy Hydrofarm Holdings Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Hydrofarm Holdings Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Hydrofarm Holdings Group include Cosmos Health (COSM), Natural Health Trends (NHTC), Ten-League International (TLIH), Scienture (SCNX), and Educational Development (EDUC). These companies are all part of the "wholesale" industry.

How does Hydrofarm Holdings Group compare to Cosmos Health?

Hydrofarm Holdings Group (NASDAQ:HYFM) and Cosmos Health (NASDAQ:COSM) are both small-cap wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and risk.

26.6% of Hydrofarm Holdings Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.6% of Cosmos Health shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.9% of Hydrofarm Holdings Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 26.2% of Cosmos Health shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cosmos Health has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Cosmos Health is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hydrofarm Holdings Group$134.25M0.02-$289.79M-$62.10N/A
Cosmos Health$65.27M0.29-$19.15M-$0.64N/A

Cosmos Health has a net margin of -30.41% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net margin of -237.25%. Cosmos Health's return on equity of -52.85% beat Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hydrofarm Holdings Group-237.25% -500.33% -115.88%
Cosmos Health -30.41%-52.85%-17.87%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hydrofarm Holdings Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Cosmos Health
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 2.31, suggesting that its share price is 131% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cosmos Health has a beta of 4.83, suggesting that its share price is 383% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cosmos Health had 13 more articles in the media than Hydrofarm Holdings Group. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Cosmos Health and 1 mentions for Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Cosmos Health's score of 0.52 indicating that Hydrofarm Holdings Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hydrofarm Holdings Group Very Positive
Cosmos Health Positive

Summary

Cosmos Health beats Hydrofarm Holdings Group on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hydrofarm Holdings Group compare to Natural Health Trends?

Natural Health Trends (NASDAQ:NHTC) and Hydrofarm Holdings Group (NASDAQ:HYFM) are both small-cap wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

10.1% of Natural Health Trends shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.6% of Hydrofarm Holdings Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.9% of Natural Health Trends shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.9% of Hydrofarm Holdings Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Natural Health Trends has a net margin of -3.03% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net margin of -237.25%. Natural Health Trends' return on equity of -4.88% beat Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Natural Health Trends-3.03% -4.88% -2.94%
Hydrofarm Holdings Group -237.25%-500.33%-115.88%

Natural Health Trends has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Natural Health Trends is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Natural Health Trends$39.78M0.39-$880K-$0.11N/A
Hydrofarm Holdings Group$134.25M0.02-$289.79M-$62.10N/A

Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 2.31, meaning that its share price is 131% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Natural Health Trends had 2 more articles in the media than Hydrofarm Holdings Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Natural Health Trends and 1 mentions for Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Natural Health Trends' score of 1.46 indicating that Hydrofarm Holdings Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Natural Health Trends Positive
Hydrofarm Holdings Group Very Positive

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Natural Health Trends
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Hydrofarm Holdings Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Natural Health Trends beats Hydrofarm Holdings Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hydrofarm Holdings Group compare to Ten-League International?

Hydrofarm Holdings Group (NASDAQ:HYFM) and Ten-League International (NASDAQ:TLIH) are both small-cap wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hydrofarm Holdings Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Ten-League International
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Ten-League International has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net margin of -237.25%. Ten-League International's return on equity of 0.00% beat Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hydrofarm Holdings Group-237.25% -500.33% -115.88%
Ten-League International N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Ten-League International had 2 more articles in the media than Hydrofarm Holdings Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Ten-League International and 1 mentions for Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Ten-League International's score of 0.96 indicating that Hydrofarm Holdings Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hydrofarm Holdings Group Very Positive
Ten-League International Positive

26.6% of Hydrofarm Holdings Group shares are held by institutional investors. 14.9% of Hydrofarm Holdings Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ten-League International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hydrofarm Holdings Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hydrofarm Holdings Group$134.25M0.02-$289.79M-$62.10N/A
Ten-League International$76.18M0.21$4.34MN/AN/A

Summary

Ten-League International beats Hydrofarm Holdings Group on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hydrofarm Holdings Group compare to Scienture?

Hydrofarm Holdings Group (NASDAQ:HYFM) and Scienture (NASDAQ:SCNX) are both small-cap wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, earnings, valuation and media sentiment.

Scienture has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net margin of -237.25%. Scienture's return on equity of -56.28% beat Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hydrofarm Holdings Group-237.25% -500.33% -115.88%
Scienture N/A -56.28%-44.76%

In the previous week, Scienture had 3 more articles in the media than Hydrofarm Holdings Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Scienture and 1 mentions for Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Scienture's score of 0.59 indicating that Hydrofarm Holdings Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hydrofarm Holdings Group Very Positive
Scienture Positive

Scienture has a consensus target price of $1.50, indicating a potential upside of 285.60%. Given Scienture's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Scienture is more favorable than Hydrofarm Holdings Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hydrofarm Holdings Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Scienture
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

26.6% of Hydrofarm Holdings Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.7% of Scienture shares are held by institutional investors. 14.9% of Hydrofarm Holdings Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 21.4% of Scienture shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Scienture has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Scienture is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hydrofarm Holdings Group$134.25M0.02-$289.79M-$62.10N/A
Scienture$430K36.76-$41.51M-$2.51N/A

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 2.31, meaning that its share price is 131% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Scienture has a beta of 3.28, meaning that its share price is 228% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Scienture beats Hydrofarm Holdings Group on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hydrofarm Holdings Group compare to Educational Development?

Hydrofarm Holdings Group (NASDAQ:HYFM) and Educational Development (NASDAQ:EDUC) are both small-cap wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and dividends.

Educational Development has a net margin of 9.75% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net margin of -237.25%. Educational Development's return on equity of -18.23% beat Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hydrofarm Holdings Group-237.25% -500.33% -115.88%
Educational Development 9.75%-18.23%-12.73%

In the previous week, Educational Development had 5 more articles in the media than Hydrofarm Holdings Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Educational Development and 1 mentions for Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Educational Development's score of 0.09 indicating that Hydrofarm Holdings Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hydrofarm Holdings Group Very Positive
Educational Development Neutral

Educational Development has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Hydrofarm Holdings Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Educational Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hydrofarm Holdings Group$134.25M0.02-$289.79M-$62.10N/A
Educational Development$22.91M0.55$2.33M$0.236.43

26.6% of Hydrofarm Holdings Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.6% of Educational Development shares are held by institutional investors. 14.9% of Hydrofarm Holdings Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.9% of Educational Development shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hydrofarm Holdings Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Educational Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 2.31, suggesting that its stock price is 131% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Educational Development has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Educational Development beats Hydrofarm Holdings Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hydrofarm Holdings Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HYFM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HYFM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HYFM vs. The Competition

Export
MetricHydrofarm Holdings GroupAgriculture/Products IndustryMaterials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$3.57M$6.88B$4.53B$12.44B
Dividend YieldN/A2.51%5.04%8.42%
P/E Ratio-0.017.7021.1324.38
Price / Sales0.029.196,281.3191.92
Price / CashN/A6.7426.4659.36
Price / Book-0.051.198.996.33
Net Income-$289.79M$494.02M$157.11M$331.02M
7 Day Performance-19.35%-1.03%0.58%-0.33%
1 Month Performance-25.15%-1.93%-5.22%-1.29%
1 Year Performance-83.72%23.63%39.47%21.30%

Hydrofarm Holdings Group Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HYFM
Hydrofarm Holdings Group
0.8502 of 5 stars		$0.70
-6.7%		N/A-82.2%$3.57M$134.25MN/A840
COSM
Cosmos Health
1.6353 of 5 stars		$0.25
-5.9%		N/A-37.8%$15.77M$65.27MN/A100
NHTC
Natural Health Trends
1.5417 of 5 stars		$1.80
-4.5%		N/A-60.3%$15.40M$39.78MN/A140
TLIH
Ten-League International
0.9349 of 5 stars		$4.99
+3.6%		N/AN/A$14.68M$59.24MN/A64
SCNX
Scienture
3.2379 of 5 stars		$0.35
-0.1%		$1.50
+334.8%		-76.4%$14.02M$430KN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:HYFM) was last updated on 7/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
From the man who predicted 2008 crash…
Porter Stansberry, founder of one of the largest financial research firms in the world, says he's breaking the...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel