Go Pro

Hydrofarm Holdings Group (HYFM) Competitors

Hydrofarm Holdings Group logo
$0.74 -0.11 (-12.88%)
Closing price 07/1/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$0.76 +0.02 (+2.66%)
As of 07/1/2026 07:06 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

HYFM vs. SCNX, NHTC, TLIH, EDUC, and UUU

Should you buy Hydrofarm Holdings Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Hydrofarm Holdings Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Hydrofarm Holdings Group include Scienture (SCNX), Natural Health Trends (NHTC), Ten-League International (TLIH), Educational Development (EDUC), and Universal Security Instruments (UUU). These companies are all part of the "wholesale" industry.

How does Hydrofarm Holdings Group compare to Scienture?

Hydrofarm Holdings Group (NASDAQ:HYFM) and Scienture (NASDAQ:SCNX) are both small-cap wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Scienture has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net margin of -237.25%. Scienture's return on equity of -56.28% beat Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hydrofarm Holdings Group-237.25% -500.33% -115.88%
Scienture N/A -56.28%-44.76%

26.6% of Hydrofarm Holdings Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.7% of Scienture shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.9% of Hydrofarm Holdings Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.4% of Scienture shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Scienture has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Scienture is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hydrofarm Holdings Group$134.25M0.03-$289.79M-$62.10N/A
Scienture$430K33.67-$41.51M-$2.51N/A

In the previous week, Scienture had 2 more articles in the media than Hydrofarm Holdings Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Scienture and 1 mentions for Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Scienture's score of 0.87 indicating that Hydrofarm Holdings Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hydrofarm Holdings Group Very Positive
Scienture Positive

Scienture has a consensus price target of $1.50, indicating a potential upside of 320.99%. Given Scienture's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Scienture is more favorable than Hydrofarm Holdings Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hydrofarm Holdings Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Scienture
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 2.31, indicating that its stock price is 131% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Scienture has a beta of 3.28, indicating that its stock price is 228% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Scienture beats Hydrofarm Holdings Group on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hydrofarm Holdings Group compare to Natural Health Trends?

Natural Health Trends (NASDAQ:NHTC) and Hydrofarm Holdings Group (NASDAQ:HYFM) are both small-cap wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends and media sentiment.

10.1% of Natural Health Trends shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.6% of Hydrofarm Holdings Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.9% of Natural Health Trends shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.9% of Hydrofarm Holdings Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Natural Health Trends has a net margin of -3.03% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net margin of -237.25%. Natural Health Trends' return on equity of -4.88% beat Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Natural Health Trends-3.03% -4.88% -2.94%
Hydrofarm Holdings Group -237.25%-500.33%-115.88%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Natural Health Trends
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Hydrofarm Holdings Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Natural Health Trends has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Natural Health Trends is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Natural Health Trends$39.78M0.39-$880K-$0.11N/A
Hydrofarm Holdings Group$134.25M0.03-$289.79M-$62.10N/A

In the previous week, Natural Health Trends and Natural Health Trends both had 1 articles in the media. Natural Health Trends' average media sentiment score of 1.90 beat Hydrofarm Holdings Group's score of 1.89 indicating that Natural Health Trends is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Natural Health Trends Very Positive
Hydrofarm Holdings Group Very Positive

Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 2.31, meaning that its stock price is 131% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Natural Health Trends beats Hydrofarm Holdings Group on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hydrofarm Holdings Group compare to Ten-League International?

Ten-League International (NASDAQ:TLIH) and Hydrofarm Holdings Group (NASDAQ:HYFM) are both small-cap wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ten-League International
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Hydrofarm Holdings Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Ten-League International has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net margin of -237.25%. Ten-League International's return on equity of 0.00% beat Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ten-League InternationalN/A N/A N/A
Hydrofarm Holdings Group -237.25%-500.33%-115.88%

In the previous week, Ten-League International and Ten-League International both had 1 articles in the media. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Ten-League International's score of 1.87 indicating that Hydrofarm Holdings Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ten-League International Very Positive
Hydrofarm Holdings Group Very Positive

Ten-League International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hydrofarm Holdings Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ten-League International$59.24M0.23$4.34MN/AN/A
Hydrofarm Holdings Group$134.25M0.03-$289.79M-$62.10N/A

26.6% of Hydrofarm Holdings Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.9% of Hydrofarm Holdings Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ten-League International beats Hydrofarm Holdings Group on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hydrofarm Holdings Group compare to Educational Development?

Hydrofarm Holdings Group (NASDAQ:HYFM) and Educational Development (NASDAQ:EDUC) are both small-cap wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Educational Development has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Hydrofarm Holdings Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Educational Development, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hydrofarm Holdings Group$134.25M0.03-$289.79M-$62.10N/A
Educational Development$22.91M0.57$2.33M$0.265.92

Educational Development has a net margin of 10.15% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net margin of -237.25%. Educational Development's return on equity of -17.66% beat Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hydrofarm Holdings Group-237.25% -500.33% -115.88%
Educational Development 10.15%-17.66%-11.12%

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 2.31, meaning that its share price is 131% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Educational Development has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Educational Development had 1 more articles in the media than Hydrofarm Holdings Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Educational Development and 1 mentions for Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Educational Development's score of 0.44 indicating that Hydrofarm Holdings Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hydrofarm Holdings Group Very Positive
Educational Development Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hydrofarm Holdings Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Educational Development
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

26.6% of Hydrofarm Holdings Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.6% of Educational Development shares are held by institutional investors. 14.9% of Hydrofarm Holdings Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.9% of Educational Development shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Educational Development beats Hydrofarm Holdings Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hydrofarm Holdings Group compare to Universal Security Instruments?

Universal Security Instruments (NYSE:UUU) and Hydrofarm Holdings Group (NASDAQ:HYFM) are both small-cap wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

Universal Security Instruments has a net margin of -5.77% compared to Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net margin of -237.25%. Universal Security Instruments' return on equity of -27.30% beat Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Universal Security Instruments-5.77% -27.30% -12.88%
Hydrofarm Holdings Group -237.25%-500.33%-115.88%

Universal Security Instruments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Universal Security Instruments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Universal Security Instruments$10.83M1.17-$400K-$0.08N/A
Hydrofarm Holdings Group$134.25M0.03-$289.79M-$62.10N/A

Universal Security Instruments has a beta of -0.03, indicating that its stock price is 103% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 2.31, indicating that its stock price is 131% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Universal Security Instruments
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Hydrofarm Holdings Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Universal Security Instruments and Universal Security Instruments both had 1 articles in the media. Hydrofarm Holdings Group's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Universal Security Instruments' score of 0.00 indicating that Hydrofarm Holdings Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Universal Security Instruments Neutral
Hydrofarm Holdings Group Very Positive

26.6% of Hydrofarm Holdings Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.5% of Universal Security Instruments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.9% of Hydrofarm Holdings Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Universal Security Instruments beats Hydrofarm Holdings Group on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hydrofarm Holdings Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HYFM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HYFM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HYFM vs. The Competition

MetricHydrofarm Holdings GroupAgriculture/Products IndustryMaterials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$4.05M$6.36B$4.58B$12.59B
Dividend YieldN/A2.69%5.04%6.15%
P/E Ratio-0.016.9822.8825.27
Price / Sales0.038.216,380.10101.17
Price / CashN/A6.2326.8559.26
Price / Book-0.051.118.576.62
Net Income-$289.79M$494.02M$157.26M$336.83M
7 Day Performance-11.88%-0.07%0.36%3.19%
1 Month Performance-25.26%-10.67%-7.61%0.86%
1 Year Performance-80.15%13.80%45.54%27.51%

Hydrofarm Holdings Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HYFM
Hydrofarm Holdings Group
0.5267 of 5 stars
$0.74
-12.9%
N/A-79.3%$4.05M$134.25MN/A840
SCNX
Scienture
2.7902 of 5 stars
$0.38
+0.5%
$1.50
+290.6%
-72.4%$15.60M$477.68KN/AN/A
NHTC
Natural Health Trends
1.5293 of 5 stars
$1.67
flat
N/A-59.0%$14.33M$38.25MN/A140
TLIH
Ten-League International
1.01 of 5 stars
$4.47
-3.9%
N/AN/A$13.14M$76.18MN/A64
EDUC
Educational Development
0.9519 of 5 stars
$1.52
+0.0%
N/A+15.8%$12.94M$22.91M5.85170

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:HYFM) was last updated on 7/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners