Go Pro

Integrated Media Technology (IMTE) Competitors

Integrated Media Technology logo
$0.51 +0.01 (+2.93%)
As of 08/21/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

IMTE vs. TWG, SYY, USFD, PFGC, and CHEF

Should you buy Integrated Media Technology stock or one of its competitors? Integrated Media Technology's main competitors and comparable companies include Top Wealth Group (TWG), Sysco (SYY), US Foods (USFD), Performance Food Group (PFGC), and Chefs' Warehouse (CHEF). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "food distributors" industry.

How does Integrated Media Technology compare to Top Wealth Group?

Integrated Media Technology (NASDAQ:IMTE) and Top Wealth Group (NASDAQ:TWG) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Integrated Media TechnologyN/A N/A N/A
Top Wealth Group N/A N/A N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Integrated Media Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Top Wealth Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Top Wealth Group had 7 more articles in the media than Integrated Media Technology. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Top Wealth Group and 0 mentions for Integrated Media Technology. Top Wealth Group's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Integrated Media Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Top Wealth Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Integrated Media Technology Neutral
Top Wealth Group Positive

Top Wealth Group has higher revenue and earnings than Integrated Media Technology.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Integrated Media Technology$70K25.14-$270KN/AN/A
Top Wealth Group$9.13M0.10$3.19MN/AN/A

Integrated Media Technology has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Top Wealth Group has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Top Wealth Group beats Integrated Media Technology on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Integrated Media Technology compare to Sysco?

Integrated Media Technology (NASDAQ:IMTE) and Sysco (NYSE:SYY) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Integrated Media Technology has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sysco has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

Sysco has a consensus price target of $89.50, suggesting a potential upside of 6.50%. Given Sysco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Sysco is more favorable than Integrated Media Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Integrated Media Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Sysco
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Sysco has higher revenue and earnings than Integrated Media Technology.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Integrated Media Technology$70K25.14-$270KN/AN/A
Sysco$84.55B0.48$1.76B$3.6622.96

In the previous week, Sysco had 49 more articles in the media than Integrated Media Technology. MarketBeat recorded 49 mentions for Sysco and 0 mentions for Integrated Media Technology. Sysco's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Integrated Media Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Sysco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Integrated Media Technology Neutral
Sysco Positive

83.4% of Sysco shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Integrated Media Technology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Sysco shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sysco has a net margin of 2.08% compared to Integrated Media Technology's net margin of 0.00%. Sysco's return on equity of 95.05% beat Integrated Media Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Integrated Media TechnologyN/A N/A N/A
Sysco 2.08%95.05%8.00%

Summary

Sysco beats Integrated Media Technology on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Integrated Media Technology compare to US Foods?

Integrated Media Technology (NASDAQ:IMTE) and US Foods (NYSE:USFD) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Integrated Media Technology has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, US Foods has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

US Foods has a net margin of 1.81% compared to Integrated Media Technology's net margin of 0.00%. US Foods' return on equity of 20.53% beat Integrated Media Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Integrated Media TechnologyN/A N/A N/A
US Foods 1.81%20.53%6.32%

US Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Integrated Media Technology.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Integrated Media Technology$70K25.14-$270KN/AN/A
US Foods$39.42B0.60$676M$3.2533.70

In the previous week, US Foods had 17 more articles in the media than Integrated Media Technology. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for US Foods and 0 mentions for Integrated Media Technology. US Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.52 beat Integrated Media Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that US Foods is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Integrated Media Technology Neutral
US Foods Very Positive

US Foods has a consensus price target of $113.92, suggesting a potential upside of 4.02%. Given US Foods' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe US Foods is more favorable than Integrated Media Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Integrated Media Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
US Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73

98.8% of US Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Integrated Media Technology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of US Foods shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

US Foods beats Integrated Media Technology on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Integrated Media Technology compare to Performance Food Group?

Integrated Media Technology (NASDAQ:IMTE) and Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Integrated Media Technology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Performance Food Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Integrated Media Technology has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Performance Food Group has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Performance Food Group had 14 more articles in the media than Integrated Media Technology. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Performance Food Group and 0 mentions for Integrated Media Technology. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Integrated Media Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Integrated Media Technology Neutral
Performance Food Group Positive

Performance Food Group has a consensus target price of $126.90, suggesting a potential upside of 20.87%. Given Performance Food Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than Integrated Media Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Integrated Media Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Performance Food Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

Performance Food Group has a net margin of 0.53% compared to Integrated Media Technology's net margin of 0.00%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 15.15% beat Integrated Media Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Integrated Media TechnologyN/A N/A N/A
Performance Food Group 0.53%15.15%3.87%

Performance Food Group has higher revenue and earnings than Integrated Media Technology.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Integrated Media Technology$70K25.14-$270KN/AN/A
Performance Food Group$67.84B0.24$359.30M$2.2945.85

Summary

Performance Food Group beats Integrated Media Technology on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Integrated Media Technology compare to Chefs' Warehouse?

Integrated Media Technology (NASDAQ:IMTE) and Chefs' Warehouse (NASDAQ:CHEF) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Chefs' Warehouse has a consensus target price of $107.43, suggesting a potential downside of 2.88%. Given Chefs' Warehouse's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Chefs' Warehouse is more favorable than Integrated Media Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Integrated Media Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Chefs' Warehouse
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88

Integrated Media Technology has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of 2.09% compared to Integrated Media Technology's net margin of 0.00%. Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 16.95% beat Integrated Media Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Integrated Media TechnologyN/A N/A N/A
Chefs' Warehouse 2.09%16.95%5.19%

91.6% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Integrated Media Technology shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.1% of Chefs' Warehouse shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Chefs' Warehouse had 18 more articles in the media than Integrated Media Technology. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Chefs' Warehouse and 0 mentions for Integrated Media Technology. Chefs' Warehouse's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Integrated Media Technology's score of 0.00 indicating that Chefs' Warehouse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Integrated Media Technology Neutral
Chefs' Warehouse Positive

Chefs' Warehouse has higher revenue and earnings than Integrated Media Technology.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Integrated Media Technology$70K25.14-$270KN/AN/A
Chefs' Warehouse$4.15B1.09$72.36M$2.1052.67

Summary

Chefs' Warehouse beats Integrated Media Technology on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Integrated Media Technology News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IMTE and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IMTE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IMTE vs. The Competition

MetricIntegrated Media TechnologyConsumer Staples Distribution & Retail IndustryConsumer Staples SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.76M$26.67B$15.97B$12.85B
Dividend YieldN/A3.53%3.20%11.08%
P/E RatioN/A15.8313.5824.24
Price / Sales25.148.21262,280.2299.76
Price / CashN/A42.6757.5753.99
Price / Book0.133.944.516.20
Net Income-$270K$884.06M$834.02M$348.59M
7 Day Performance-2.52%-1.72%0.26%0.08%
1 Month Performance8.49%1.07%2.22%3.88%
1 Year Performance-48.07%-5.65%13.47%16.98%

Integrated Media Technology Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IMTE
Integrated Media Technology
0.5747 of 5 stars
$0.51
+2.9%
N/A-48.1%$1.76M$70KN/A10
TWG
Top Wealth Group
1.1783 of 5 stars
$1.32
-8.3%
N/A-88.9%$2.11M$9.13MN/A12
SYY
Sysco
4.4887 of 5 stars
$84.76
+0.6%
$89.50
+5.6%
+4.8%$40.58B$84.55B23.1675,000
USFD
US Foods
3.3691 of 5 stars
$110.85
+0.3%
$113.92
+2.8%
+40.4%$23.98B$40.13B34.1130,000
PFGC
Performance Food Group
4.2223 of 5 stars
$107.32
-5.8%
$123.82
+15.4%
+3.1%$16.86B$63.30B51.1143,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:IMTE) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners