Knightscope (KSCP) Competitors

Knightscope has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CSLM Acquisition has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

Knightscope currently has a consensus price target of $15.33, suggesting a potential upside of 453.55%. CSLM Acquisition has a consensus price target of $5.40, suggesting a potential upside of 437.31%. Given Knightscope's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Knightscope is more favorable than CSLM Acquisition.

CSLM Acquisition has a net margin of -14.34% compared to Knightscope's net margin of -257.99%. CSLM Acquisition's return on equity of -12.90% beat Knightscope's return on equity.

14.6% of Knightscope shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.4% of CSLM Acquisition shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of Knightscope shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 42.6% of CSLM Acquisition shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Knightscope has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CSLM Acquisition. CSLM Acquisition is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Knightscope, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, CSLM Acquisition had 2 more articles in the media than Knightscope. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for CSLM Acquisition and 1 mentions for Knightscope. Knightscope's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat CSLM Acquisition's score of 0.47 indicating that Knightscope is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Knightscope has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energous has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

Knightscope currently has a consensus price target of $15.33, suggesting a potential upside of 453.55%. Given Knightscope's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Knightscope is more favorable than Energous.

14.6% of Knightscope shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of Energous shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Knightscope shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Energous shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Knightscope's net margin of -257.99%. Energous' return on equity of -39.80% beat Knightscope's return on equity.

In the previous week, Energous had 2 more articles in the media than Knightscope. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Energous and 1 mentions for Knightscope. Knightscope's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Energous' score of 1.34 indicating that Knightscope is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Energous has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Knightscope. Energous is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Knightscope, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Knightscope has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Coda Octopus Group has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Knightscope presently has a consensus price target of $15.33, suggesting a potential upside of 453.55%. Given Knightscope's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Knightscope is more favorable than Coda Octopus Group.

Coda Octopus Group has a net margin of 14.78% compared to Knightscope's net margin of -257.99%. Coda Octopus Group's return on equity of 7.17% beat Knightscope's return on equity.

Coda Octopus Group has higher revenue and earnings than Knightscope. Knightscope is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Coda Octopus Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

14.6% of Knightscope shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 20.1% of Coda Octopus Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Knightscope shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 21.8% of Coda Octopus Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Knightscope and Knightscope both had 1 articles in the media. Knightscope's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Coda Octopus Group's score of 0.93 indicating that Knightscope is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Rekor Systems has a net margin of -60.48% compared to Knightscope's net margin of -257.99%. Rekor Systems' return on equity of -80.28% beat Knightscope's return on equity.

Rekor Systems has a beta of 1.83, suggesting that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Knightscope has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Knightscope has a consensus price target of $15.33, indicating a potential upside of 453.55%. Given Knightscope's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Knightscope is more favorable than Rekor Systems.

45.7% of Rekor Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.6% of Knightscope shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of Rekor Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Knightscope shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Rekor Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Knightscope. Rekor Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Knightscope, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Rekor Systems and Rekor Systems both had 1 articles in the media. Knightscope's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Rekor Systems' score of 0.94 indicating that Knightscope is being referred to more favorably in the news media.