Lavoro (LVRO) Competitors

Rent the Runway has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lavoro. Lavoro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rent the Runway, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Rent the Runway has a net margin of 8.51% compared to Lavoro's net margin of 0.00%.

Rent the Runway has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lavoro has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Rent the Runway had 2 more articles in the media than Lavoro. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Rent the Runway and 0 mentions for Lavoro. Rent the Runway's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Lavoro's score of 0.00 indicating that Rent the Runway is being referred to more favorably in the media.

73.1% of Rent the Runway shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of Lavoro shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Rent the Runway shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

a.k.a. Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lavoro. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lavoro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

a.k.a. Brands has a consensus target price of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 69.64%. Given a.k.a. Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Lavoro.

Lavoro has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

2.5% of Lavoro shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lavoro has a net margin of 0.00% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -5.00%. Lavoro's return on equity of 0.00% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands had 2 more articles in the media than Lavoro. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for a.k.a. Brands and 0 mentions for Lavoro. Lavoro's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled a.k.a. Brands'average media sentiment score.

Vince has a net margin of 2.97% compared to Lavoro's net margin of 0.00%. Vince's return on equity of 15.85% beat Lavoro's return on equity.

16.1% of Vince shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of Lavoro shares are owned by institutional investors. 56.5% of Vince shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Vince currently has a consensus price target of $4.50, suggesting a potential downside of 35.16%. Given Vince's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Vince is more favorable than Lavoro.

In the previous week, Vince had 4 more articles in the media than Lavoro. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Vince and 0 mentions for Lavoro. Vince's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Lavoro's score of 0.00 indicating that Vince is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Vince has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lavoro. Lavoro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vince, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Vince has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lavoro has a beta of 0.56, suggesting that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

2.5% of Lavoro shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.8% of BARK shares are held by institutional investors. 14.8% of BARK shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

BARK has a consensus price target of $15.33, suggesting a potential upside of 41.00%. Given BARK's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe BARK is more favorable than Lavoro.

Lavoro has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BARK has a beta of 1.92, indicating that its stock price is 92% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, BARK had 3 more articles in the media than Lavoro. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for BARK and 0 mentions for Lavoro. BARK's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Lavoro's score of 0.00 indicating that BARK is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

BARK has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lavoro. BARK is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lavoro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Lavoro has a net margin of 0.00% compared to BARK's net margin of -9.88%. Lavoro's return on equity of 0.00% beat BARK's return on equity.