WM Technology (MAPS) Competitors

CI&T (NYSE:CINT) and WM Technology (NASDAQ:MAPS) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, risk, earnings and valuation.

Do institutionals and insiders believe in CINT or MAPS?

92.5% of CI&T shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.0% of WM Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 23.6% of WM Technology shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Does the media prefer CINT or MAPS?

In the previous week, CI&T had 2 more articles in the media than WM Technology. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for CI&T and 1 mentions for WM Technology. WM Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat CI&T's score of 0.53 indicating that WM Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
CI&T	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
WM Technology	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Which has more risk & volatility, CINT or MAPS?

CI&T has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, WM Technology has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Do analysts rate CINT or MAPS?

CI&T presently has a consensus price target of $7.80, indicating a potential upside of 70.49%. WM Technology has a consensus price target of $2.61, indicating a potential upside of 126.96%. Given WM Technology's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe WM Technology is more favorable than CI&T.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CI&T	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
WM Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Is CINT or MAPS more profitable?

CI&T has a net margin of 7.27% compared to WM Technology's net margin of 4.77%. CI&T's return on equity of 11.34% beat WM Technology's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CI&T	7.27%	11.34%	6.05%
WM Technology	4.77%	7.20%	4.82%

Which has better valuation and earnings, CINT or MAPS?

CI&T has higher revenue and earnings than WM Technology. WM Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CI&T, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CI&T	$439.11M	1.40	$29.49M	$0.24	19.06
WM Technology	$184.51M	0.98	$7.64M	$0.08	14.38

Summary

CI&T beats WM Technology on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.