Go Pro

Grid Dynamics (GDYN) Competitors

Grid Dynamics logo
$7.97 +0.08 (+1.01%)
As of 08/28/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

GDYN vs. EPAM, FORTY, GLOB, DXC, and BBAI

Should you buy Grid Dynamics stock or one of its competitors? Grid Dynamics's main competitors and comparable companies include EPAM Systems (EPAM), Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY), Globant (GLOB), DXC Technology (DXC), and BigBear.ai (BBAI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "it consulting & other services" industry.

How does Grid Dynamics compare to EPAM Systems?

EPAM Systems (NYSE:EPAM) and Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

EPAM Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Grid Dynamics. EPAM Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grid Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EPAM Systems$5.46B1.09$377.68M$7.3815.56
Grid Dynamics$422.58M1.53$9.67M$0.02398.50

EPAM Systems has a net margin of 7.15% compared to Grid Dynamics' net margin of 0.68%. EPAM Systems' return on equity of 15.84% beat Grid Dynamics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EPAM Systems7.15% 15.84% 11.95%
Grid Dynamics 0.68%1.90%1.66%

91.6% of EPAM Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of EPAM Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

EPAM Systems presently has a consensus target price of $116.47, suggesting a potential upside of 1.40%. Grid Dynamics has a consensus target price of $9.40, suggesting a potential upside of 17.94%. Given Grid Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Grid Dynamics is more favorable than EPAM Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
EPAM Systems
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
Grid Dynamics
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, EPAM Systems had 13 more articles in the media than Grid Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for EPAM Systems and 3 mentions for Grid Dynamics. Grid Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat EPAM Systems' score of 0.44 indicating that Grid Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
EPAM Systems
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Grid Dynamics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

EPAM Systems beats Grid Dynamics on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Grid Dynamics compare to Formula Systems (1985)?

Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) and Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

Formula Systems (1985) has higher revenue and earnings than Grid Dynamics. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grid Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Formula Systems (1985)$2.63B0.73$606.48M$39.833.16
Grid Dynamics$422.58M1.53$9.67M$0.02398.50

In the previous week, Formula Systems (1985) had 8 more articles in the media than Grid Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Formula Systems (1985) and 3 mentions for Grid Dynamics. Grid Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Formula Systems (1985)'s score of 0.81 indicating that Grid Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Formula Systems (1985)
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Grid Dynamics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Grid Dynamics has a consensus price target of $9.40, suggesting a potential upside of 17.94%. Given Grid Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Grid Dynamics is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Formula Systems (1985)
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Grid Dynamics
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.57% compared to Grid Dynamics' net margin of 0.68%. Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity of 4.38% beat Grid Dynamics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Formula Systems (1985)21.57% 4.38% 2.13%
Grid Dynamics 0.68%1.90%1.66%

Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Formula Systems (1985) beats Grid Dynamics on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Grid Dynamics compare to Globant?

Globant (NYSE:GLOB) and Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk and dividends.

Globant has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Grid Dynamics' net margin of 0.68%. Globant's return on equity of 9.28% beat Grid Dynamics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Globant4.63% 9.28% 6.18%
Grid Dynamics 0.68%1.90%1.66%

Globant has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

Globant presently has a consensus target price of $46.38, suggesting a potential upside of 14.28%. Grid Dynamics has a consensus target price of $9.40, suggesting a potential upside of 17.94%. Given Grid Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Grid Dynamics is more favorable than Globant.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Globant
2 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17
Grid Dynamics
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

91.6% of Globant shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Globant shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Globant has higher revenue and earnings than Grid Dynamics. Globant is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grid Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Globant$2.45B0.72$102.92M$2.5515.91
Grid Dynamics$422.58M1.53$9.67M$0.02398.50

In the previous week, Globant had 15 more articles in the media than Grid Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Globant and 3 mentions for Grid Dynamics. Grid Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Globant's score of 0.51 indicating that Grid Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Globant
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Grid Dynamics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Globant beats Grid Dynamics on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Grid Dynamics compare to DXC Technology?

DXC Technology (NYSE:DXC) and Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

DXC Technology has a net margin of 0.99% compared to Grid Dynamics' net margin of 0.68%. DXC Technology's return on equity of 15.60% beat Grid Dynamics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DXC Technology0.99% 15.60% 3.94%
Grid Dynamics 0.68%1.90%1.66%

DXC Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Grid Dynamics. DXC Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grid Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DXC Technology$12.48B0.14$18M$0.7016.06
Grid Dynamics$422.58M1.53$9.67M$0.02398.50

96.2% of DXC Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of DXC Technology shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

DXC Technology currently has a consensus target price of $12.21, suggesting a potential upside of 8.67%. Grid Dynamics has a consensus target price of $9.40, suggesting a potential upside of 17.94%. Given Grid Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Grid Dynamics is more favorable than DXC Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DXC Technology
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.78
Grid Dynamics
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

DXC Technology has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, DXC Technology had 1 more articles in the media than Grid Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for DXC Technology and 3 mentions for Grid Dynamics. DXC Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Grid Dynamics' score of 0.81 indicating that DXC Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
DXC Technology
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Grid Dynamics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

DXC Technology beats Grid Dynamics on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Grid Dynamics compare to BigBear.ai?

Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) and BigBear.ai (NYSE:BBAI) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

71.2% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of BigBear.ai shares are held by institutional investors. 6.5% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of BigBear.ai shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Grid Dynamics had 2 more articles in the media than BigBear.ai. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Grid Dynamics and 1 mentions for BigBear.ai. BigBear.ai's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Grid Dynamics' score of 0.81 indicating that BigBear.ai is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Grid Dynamics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
BigBear.ai
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Grid Dynamics presently has a consensus price target of $9.40, suggesting a potential upside of 17.94%. BigBear.ai has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 62.87%. Given BigBear.ai's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe BigBear.ai is more favorable than Grid Dynamics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Grid Dynamics
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
BigBear.ai
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Grid Dynamics has a net margin of 0.68% compared to BigBear.ai's net margin of -65.20%. Grid Dynamics' return on equity of 1.90% beat BigBear.ai's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Grid Dynamics0.68% 1.90% 1.66%
BigBear.ai -65.20%-13.44%-10.63%

Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BigBear.ai has a beta of 3.35, meaning that its share price is 235% more volatile than the broader market.

Grid Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than BigBear.ai. BigBear.ai is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grid Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Grid Dynamics$422.58M1.53$9.67M$0.02398.50
BigBear.ai$127.67M11.53-$293.91M-$0.21N/A

Summary

Grid Dynamics beats BigBear.ai on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Grid Dynamics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GDYN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GDYN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GDYN vs. The Competition

MetricGrid DynamicsIT Services IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$646.58M$11.11B$29.73B$12.90B
Dividend YieldN/A2.76%2.74%11.28%
P/E Ratio398.7014.3375.8225.45
Price / Sales1.5358.67591.1076.64
Price / Cash19.5342.6149.2953.00
Price / Book1.2425.129.316.14
Net Income$9.67M$271.39M$678.22M$348.86M
7 Day Performance-0.38%-0.21%-0.07%-0.80%
1 Month Performance12.89%3.46%4.19%4.13%
1 Year Performance-3.86%29.58%187.24%15.17%

Grid Dynamics Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GDYN
Grid Dynamics
3.1535 of 5 stars
$7.97
+1.0%
$9.40
+17.9%
-3.9%$646.58M$422.58M398.704,961
EPAM
EPAM Systems
2.9052 of 5 stars
$111.22
+0.8%
$116.47
+4.7%
-35.0%$5.69B$5.46B15.0762,850
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
1.4379 of 5 stars
$115.25
-0.8%
N/A+1.7%$1.78B$2.63B2.9319,337
GLOB
Globant
3.922 of 5 stars
$39.64
+0.1%
$46.38
+17.0%
-39.6%$1.74B$2.45B15.5528,773
DXC
DXC Technology
3.6606 of 5 stars
$10.64
-1.5%
$12.21
+14.8%
-22.0%$1.73B$12.64B15.20115,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GDYN) was last updated on 8/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners