Grid Dynamics Competitors

SINA (NASDAQ:SINA) and Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

Risk & Volatility

SINA has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares SINA and Grid Dynamics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SINA and Grid Dynamics' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Grid Dynamics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SINA.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for SINA and Grid Dynamics, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

SINA currently has a consensus price target of $68.00, indicating a potential upside of 57.63%. Grid Dynamics has a consensus price target of $26.90, indicating a potential upside of 84.75%. Given Grid Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Grid Dynamics is more favorable than SINA.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

49.4% of SINA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.9% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of SINA shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.6% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Grid Dynamics beats SINA on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

BOX (NYSE:BOX) and Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for BOX and Grid Dynamics, as reported by MarketBeat.

BOX currently has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential upside of 32.45%. Grid Dynamics has a consensus target price of $26.90, suggesting a potential upside of 84.75%. Given Grid Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Grid Dynamics is more favorable than BOX.

Risk & Volatility

BOX has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its share price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares BOX and Grid Dynamics' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Grid Dynamics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than BOX.

Profitability

This table compares BOX and Grid Dynamics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

77.9% of BOX shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.9% of Grid Dynamics shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.2% of BOX shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.6% of Grid Dynamics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Grid Dynamics beats BOX on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) and Mimecast (NASDAQ:MIME) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

41.9% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.5% of Mimecast shares are held by institutional investors. 15.6% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.5% of Mimecast shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Grid Dynamics and Mimecast's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Mimecast has higher revenue and earnings than Grid Dynamics.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Grid Dynamics and Mimecast, as provided by MarketBeat.

Grid Dynamics currently has a consensus price target of $26.90, suggesting a potential upside of 84.75%. Mimecast has a consensus price target of $53.1053, suggesting a potential upside of 24.16%. Given Grid Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Grid Dynamics is more favorable than Mimecast.

Profitability

This table compares Grid Dynamics and Mimecast's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Mimecast has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Mimecast beats Grid Dynamics on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Momo (NASDAQ:MOMO) and Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Momo and Grid Dynamics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Momo and Grid Dynamics' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Momo has higher revenue and earnings than Grid Dynamics.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Momo and Grid Dynamics, as provided by MarketBeat.

Momo presently has a consensus target price of $25.15, suggesting a potential upside of 60.50%. Grid Dynamics has a consensus target price of $26.90, suggesting a potential upside of 84.75%. Given Grid Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Grid Dynamics is more favorable than Momo.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

50.6% of Momo shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.9% of Grid Dynamics shares are owned by institutional investors. 61.4% of Momo shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.6% of Grid Dynamics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Momo has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Momo beats Grid Dynamics on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Materialise (NASDAQ:MTLS) and Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Materialise and Grid Dynamics' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Materialise and Grid Dynamics' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Materialise has higher revenue and earnings than Grid Dynamics.

Volatility and Risk

Materialise has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Materialise and Grid Dynamics, as reported by MarketBeat.

Materialise currently has a consensus price target of $26.50, indicating a potential downside of 39.02%. Grid Dynamics has a consensus price target of $26.90, indicating a potential upside of 84.75%. Given Grid Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Grid Dynamics is more favorable than Materialise.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

33.0% of Materialise shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.9% of Grid Dynamics shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.6% of Grid Dynamics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Grid Dynamics beats Materialise on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) and Bottomline Technologies (de) (NASDAQ:EPAY) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Grid Dynamics and Bottomline Technologies (de)'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Grid Dynamics and Bottomline Technologies (de), as provided by MarketBeat.

Grid Dynamics currently has a consensus price target of $26.90, indicating a potential upside of 84.75%. Bottomline Technologies (de) has a consensus price target of $54.2143, indicating a potential upside of 20.00%. Given Grid Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Grid Dynamics is more favorable than Bottomline Technologies (de).

Institutional & Insider Ownership

41.9% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.5% of Bottomline Technologies (de) shares are held by institutional investors. 15.6% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Bottomline Technologies (de) shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Bottomline Technologies (de) has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Grid Dynamics and Bottomline Technologies (de)'s revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Grid Dynamics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bottomline Technologies (de).

Summary

Grid Dynamics beats Bottomline Technologies (de) on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.