Free Trial
Memorial Day Savings! Save $100 on MarketBeat All Access
Claim Your Discount
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Grid Dynamics (GDYN) Competitors

Grid Dynamics logo
$6.48 -0.20 (-2.99%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$6.62 +0.14 (+2.18%)
As of 05:54 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GDYN vs. EPAM, FORTY, ZI, QUBT, and EVCM

Should you buy Grid Dynamics stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Grid Dynamics with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Grid Dynamics include EPAM Systems (EPAM), Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY), ZoomInfo Technologies (ZI), Quantum Computing (QUBT), and EverCommerce (EVCM). These companies are all part of the "computer and technology" sector.

How does Grid Dynamics compare to EPAM Systems?

EPAM Systems (NYSE:EPAM) and Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

91.6% of EPAM Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of EPAM Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, EPAM Systems had 1 more articles in the media than Grid Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for EPAM Systems and 5 mentions for Grid Dynamics. Grid Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 0.16 beat EPAM Systems' score of 0.02 indicating that Grid Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
EPAM Systems
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Grid Dynamics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

EPAM Systems has a net margin of 6.96% compared to Grid Dynamics' net margin of 1.27%. EPAM Systems' return on equity of 14.71% beat Grid Dynamics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EPAM Systems6.96% 14.71% 11.14%
Grid Dynamics 1.27%1.20%1.05%

EPAM Systems currently has a consensus target price of $155.50, indicating a potential upside of 54.53%. Grid Dynamics has a consensus target price of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 54.32%. Given EPAM Systems' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe EPAM Systems is more favorable than Grid Dynamics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
EPAM Systems
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Grid Dynamics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.45, suggesting that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.86, suggesting that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

EPAM Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Grid Dynamics. EPAM Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grid Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EPAM Systems$5.46B0.96$377.68M$6.9714.44
Grid Dynamics$411.83M1.32$9.67M$0.05129.60

Summary

EPAM Systems beats Grid Dynamics on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Grid Dynamics compare to Formula Systems (1985)?

Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) and Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and earnings.

34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Grid Dynamics shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Grid Dynamics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Grid Dynamics has a consensus price target of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 54.32%. Given Grid Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Grid Dynamics is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Formula Systems (1985)
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Grid Dynamics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

In the previous week, Grid Dynamics had 1 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Grid Dynamics and 4 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Grid Dynamics' score of 0.16 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Formula Systems (1985)
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Grid Dynamics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 20.89% compared to Grid Dynamics' net margin of 1.27%. Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity of 3.25% beat Grid Dynamics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Formula Systems (1985)20.89% 3.25% 1.53%
Grid Dynamics 1.27%1.20%1.05%

Formula Systems (1985) has higher revenue and earnings than Grid Dynamics. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grid Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Formula Systems (1985)$2.63B0.84$606.48M$38.293.77
Grid Dynamics$411.83M1.32$9.67M$0.05129.60

Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Formula Systems (1985) beats Grid Dynamics on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Grid Dynamics compare to ZoomInfo Technologies?

Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) and ZoomInfo Technologies (NASDAQ:ZI) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and risk.

ZoomInfo Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Grid Dynamics. ZoomInfo Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grid Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Grid Dynamics$411.83M1.32$9.67M$0.05129.60
ZoomInfo Technologies$1.21B1.10$107.30M$0.1232.67

In the previous week, Grid Dynamics had 1 more articles in the media than ZoomInfo Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Grid Dynamics and 4 mentions for ZoomInfo Technologies. ZoomInfo Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Grid Dynamics' score of 0.16 indicating that ZoomInfo Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Grid Dynamics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ZoomInfo Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Grid Dynamics has a net margin of 1.27% compared to ZoomInfo Technologies' net margin of 0.74%. ZoomInfo Technologies' return on equity of 12.05% beat Grid Dynamics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Grid Dynamics1.27% 1.20% 1.05%
ZoomInfo Technologies 0.74%12.05%3.46%

Grid Dynamics presently has a consensus target price of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 54.32%. ZoomInfo Technologies has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 206.12%. Given ZoomInfo Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ZoomInfo Technologies is more favorable than Grid Dynamics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Grid Dynamics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
ZoomInfo Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

71.2% of Grid Dynamics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of ZoomInfo Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.5% of Grid Dynamics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.0% of ZoomInfo Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ZoomInfo Technologies has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

ZoomInfo Technologies beats Grid Dynamics on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Grid Dynamics compare to Quantum Computing?

Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) and Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. 19.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Quantum Computing currently has a consensus target price of $17.50, suggesting a potential upside of 89.80%. Grid Dynamics has a consensus target price of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 54.32%. Given Quantum Computing's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Grid Dynamics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Grid Dynamics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Grid Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grid Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Computing$680K3,058.06-$63.15M-$0.28N/A
Grid Dynamics$411.83M1.32$9.67M$0.05129.60

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 22 more articles in the media than Grid Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Quantum Computing and 5 mentions for Grid Dynamics. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Grid Dynamics' score of 0.16 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Computing
9 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Grid Dynamics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Grid Dynamics has a net margin of 1.27% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. Grid Dynamics' return on equity of 1.20% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum ComputingN/A N/A N/A
Grid Dynamics 1.27%1.20%1.05%

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.7, indicating that its share price is 270% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Grid Dynamics beats Quantum Computing on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Grid Dynamics compare to EverCommerce?

Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) and EverCommerce (NASDAQ:EVCM) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Grid Dynamics presently has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 54.32%. EverCommerce has a consensus price target of $11.25, suggesting a potential upside of 11.39%. Given Grid Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Grid Dynamics is more favorable than EverCommerce.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Grid Dynamics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
EverCommerce
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.09

71.2% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of EverCommerce shares are held by institutional investors. 6.5% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.1% of EverCommerce shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, EverCommerce had 1 more articles in the media than Grid Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for EverCommerce and 5 mentions for Grid Dynamics. EverCommerce's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Grid Dynamics' score of 0.16 indicating that EverCommerce is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Grid Dynamics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
EverCommerce
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EverCommerce has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

EverCommerce has higher revenue and earnings than Grid Dynamics. EverCommerce is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grid Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Grid Dynamics$411.83M1.32$9.67M$0.05129.60
EverCommerce$594.10M3.01$17.60M$0.1759.41

EverCommerce has a net margin of 5.47% compared to Grid Dynamics' net margin of 1.27%. EverCommerce's return on equity of 3.37% beat Grid Dynamics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Grid Dynamics1.27% 1.20% 1.05%
EverCommerce 5.47%3.37%1.76%

Summary

EverCommerce beats Grid Dynamics on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Grid Dynamics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GDYN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GDYN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GDYN vs. The Competition

MetricGrid DynamicsIT Services IndustryComputer SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$541.92M$12.89B$38.13B$12.10B
Dividend YieldN/A2.54%3.21%5.32%
P/E Ratio129.6348.4576.6725.11
Price / Sales1.328.62630.0091.32
Price / Cash16.4424.4647.8737.30
Price / Book1.013.429.506.60
Net Income$9.67M$537.84M$1.06B$335.71M
7 Day Performance-2.70%-1.38%-0.56%-2.03%
1 Month Performance8.91%-8.10%3.43%-1.90%
1 Year Performance-53.94%-15.08%159.11%27.36%

Grid Dynamics Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GDYN
Grid Dynamics
4.0971 of 5 stars
$6.48
-3.0%
$10.00
+54.3%
-52.2%$541.92M$411.83M129.634,961
EPAM
EPAM Systems
4.2981 of 5 stars
$97.12
-2.1%
$155.50
+60.1%
-45.4%$5.20B$5.46B13.9362,850
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
2.7424 of 5 stars
$147.40
flat
N/A+42.2%$2.26B$2.63B3.8522,720
ZI
ZoomInfo Technologies
2.0332 of 5 stars
$6.38
-3.8%
$11.20
+75.5%
-62.2%$2.18B$1.21B212.743,540
QUBT
Quantum Computing
3.0718 of 5 stars
$10.18
+6.0%
$17.50
+71.9%
-24.5%$2.17B$680KN/A30

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GDYN) was last updated on 5/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners