Go Pro

Grid Dynamics (GDYN) Competitors

Grid Dynamics logo
$7.59 -0.49 (-6.06%)
Closing price 09/18/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$7.58 -0.01 (-0.13%)
As of 09/18/2026 07:51 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GDYN vs. EPAM, FORTY, DXC, MGRT, and GLOB

Should you buy Grid Dynamics stock or one of its competitors? Grid Dynamics's main competitors and comparable companies include EPAM Systems (EPAM), Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY), DXC Technology (DXC), Mega Fortune (MGRT), and Globant (GLOB). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "it consulting & other services" industry.

How does Grid Dynamics compare to EPAM Systems?

Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) and EPAM Systems (NYSE:EPAM) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

EPAM Systems has a net margin of 7.15% compared to Grid Dynamics' net margin of 0.68%. EPAM Systems' return on equity of 15.84% beat Grid Dynamics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Grid Dynamics0.68% 1.90% 1.66%
EPAM Systems 7.15%15.84%11.95%

Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

71.2% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.6% of EPAM Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 6.5% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of EPAM Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Grid Dynamics currently has a consensus price target of $9.40, suggesting a potential upside of 23.85%. EPAM Systems has a consensus price target of $116.47, suggesting a potential upside of 1.60%. Given Grid Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Grid Dynamics is more favorable than EPAM Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Grid Dynamics
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
EPAM Systems
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29

EPAM Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Grid Dynamics. EPAM Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grid Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Grid Dynamics$411.83M1.50$9.67M$0.02379.50
EPAM Systems$5.46B1.08$377.68M$7.3815.53

In the previous week, EPAM Systems had 3 more articles in the media than Grid Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for EPAM Systems and 3 mentions for Grid Dynamics. Grid Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 1.56 beat EPAM Systems' score of 0.88 indicating that Grid Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Grid Dynamics
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
EPAM Systems
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

EPAM Systems beats Grid Dynamics on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Grid Dynamics compare to Formula Systems (1985)?

Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) and Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.57% compared to Grid Dynamics' net margin of 0.68%. Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity of 4.38% beat Grid Dynamics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Grid Dynamics0.68% 1.90% 1.66%
Formula Systems (1985) 21.57%4.38%2.13%

Grid Dynamics presently has a consensus price target of $9.40, indicating a potential upside of 23.85%. Given Grid Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Grid Dynamics is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Grid Dynamics
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Formula Systems (1985)
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Formula Systems (1985) has higher revenue and earnings than Grid Dynamics. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grid Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Grid Dynamics$411.83M1.50$9.67M$0.02379.50
Formula Systems (1985)$2.63B0.70$606.48M$39.832.99

71.2% of Grid Dynamics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.5% of Grid Dynamics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Grid Dynamics had 1 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Grid Dynamics and 2 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Grid Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 1.56 beat Formula Systems (1985)'s score of 0.55 indicating that Grid Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Grid Dynamics
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Formula Systems (1985)
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Grid Dynamics beats Formula Systems (1985) on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Grid Dynamics compare to DXC Technology?

DXC Technology (NYSE:DXC) and Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

DXC Technology has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, DXC Technology had 8 more articles in the media than Grid Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for DXC Technology and 3 mentions for Grid Dynamics. Grid Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 1.56 beat DXC Technology's score of 0.42 indicating that Grid Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
DXC Technology
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Grid Dynamics
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

96.2% of DXC Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Grid Dynamics shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of DXC Technology shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Grid Dynamics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

DXC Technology has a net margin of 0.99% compared to Grid Dynamics' net margin of 0.68%. DXC Technology's return on equity of 15.60% beat Grid Dynamics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DXC Technology0.99% 15.60% 3.94%
Grid Dynamics 0.68%1.90%1.66%

DXC Technology presently has a consensus price target of $12.21, indicating a potential upside of 13.73%. Grid Dynamics has a consensus price target of $9.40, indicating a potential upside of 23.85%. Given Grid Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Grid Dynamics is more favorable than DXC Technology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DXC Technology
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.78
Grid Dynamics
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

DXC Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Grid Dynamics. DXC Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grid Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DXC Technology$12.64B0.14$18M$0.7015.34
Grid Dynamics$411.83M1.50$9.67M$0.02379.50

Summary

Grid Dynamics beats DXC Technology on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Grid Dynamics compare to Mega Fortune?

Mega Fortune (NASDAQ:MGRT) and Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Grid Dynamics has a net margin of 0.68% compared to Mega Fortune's net margin of 0.00%. Grid Dynamics' return on equity of 1.90% beat Mega Fortune's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mega FortuneN/A N/A N/A
Grid Dynamics 0.68%1.90%1.66%

Grid Dynamics has a consensus target price of $9.40, suggesting a potential upside of 23.85%. Given Grid Dynamics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Grid Dynamics is more favorable than Mega Fortune.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mega Fortune
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Grid Dynamics
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Grid Dynamics has higher revenue and earnings than Mega Fortune.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mega Fortune$11.09M148.81$1.79MN/AN/A
Grid Dynamics$411.83M1.50$9.67M$0.02379.50

In the previous week, Grid Dynamics had 3 more articles in the media than Mega Fortune. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Grid Dynamics and 0 mentions for Mega Fortune. Grid Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 1.56 beat Mega Fortune's score of 0.00 indicating that Grid Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mega Fortune Neutral
Grid Dynamics Very Positive

Mega Fortune has a beta of 106.59, meaning that its share price is 10,559% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

71.2% of Grid Dynamics shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.5% of Grid Dynamics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Grid Dynamics beats Mega Fortune on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Grid Dynamics compare to Globant?

Globant (NYSE:GLOB) and Grid Dynamics (NASDAQ:GDYN) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Globant has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Globant has higher revenue and earnings than Grid Dynamics. Globant is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grid Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Globant$2.45B0.63$102.92M$2.5513.94
Grid Dynamics$411.83M1.50$9.67M$0.02379.50

Globant has a net margin of 4.63% compared to Grid Dynamics' net margin of 0.68%. Globant's return on equity of 9.28% beat Grid Dynamics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Globant4.63% 9.28% 6.18%
Grid Dynamics 0.68%1.90%1.66%

91.6% of Globant shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Globant shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Globant currently has a consensus price target of $46.38, suggesting a potential upside of 30.43%. Grid Dynamics has a consensus price target of $9.40, suggesting a potential upside of 23.85%. Given Globant's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Globant is more favorable than Grid Dynamics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Globant
2 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17
Grid Dynamics
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Globant had 1 more articles in the media than Grid Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Globant and 3 mentions for Grid Dynamics. Grid Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 1.56 beat Globant's score of 0.65 indicating that Grid Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Globant
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Grid Dynamics
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

Globant beats Grid Dynamics on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Grid Dynamics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GDYN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GDYN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GDYN vs. The Competition

MetricGrid DynamicsIT Services IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$615.75M$10.58B$30.35B$13.19B
Dividend YieldN/A2.84%2.75%12.81%
P/E Ratio379.6913.8777.4125.40
Price / Sales1.5071.02590.2189.45
Price / Cash18.6045.5548.1751.42
Price / Book1.198.207.826.33
Net Income$9.67M$271.17M$702.35M$358.33M
7 Day Performance-4.89%0.32%-0.52%1.12%
1 Month Performance-4.05%-2.20%-2.28%-2.39%
1 Year Performance0.80%23.20%176.56%5.35%

Grid Dynamics Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GDYN
Grid Dynamics
4.403 of 5 stars
$7.59
-6.1%
$9.40
+23.8%
+0.8%$615.75M$411.83M379.694,961
EPAM
EPAM Systems
2.0312 of 5 stars
$123.66
+4.9%
$116.47
-5.8%
-26.5%$6.08B$5.46B16.7662,850
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
1.3726 of 5 stars
$124.00
+1.1%
N/A-17.1%$1.88B$2.63B3.1119,337
DXC
DXC Technology
3.8422 of 5 stars
$12.16
+6.7%
$12.21
+0.5%
-22.1%$1.82B$12.64B17.36115,000
MGRT
Mega Fortune
N/A$121.88
+1.2%
N/A+2,820.3%$1.66B$11.09MN/A17

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GDYN) was last updated on 9/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners