Which has better valuation & earnings, WK or BL?

BlackLine has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Workiva. BlackLine is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workiva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Workiva $884.57M 3.61 -$26.17M $0.23 247.33 BlackLine $700.43M 2.51 $24.17M $0.43 69.69

Is WK or BL more profitable?

BlackLine has a net margin of 3.71% compared to Workiva's net margin of 1.53%. BlackLine's return on equity of 18.86% beat Workiva's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Workiva 1.53% -68.43% 1.47% BlackLine 3.71% 18.86% 3.88%

Does the media refer more to WK or BL?

In the previous week, Workiva had 3 more articles in the media than BlackLine. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Workiva and 3 mentions for BlackLine. Workiva's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat BlackLine's score of 0.78 indicating that Workiva is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Workiva 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive BlackLine 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, FROG or WK?

Workiva has higher revenue and earnings than JFrog. JFrog is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workiva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio JFrog $531.84M 19.77 -$71.82M -$0.53 N/A Workiva $884.57M 3.61 -$26.17M $0.23 247.33

Is FROG or WK more profitable?

Workiva has a net margin of 1.53% compared to JFrog's net margin of -10.93%. JFrog's return on equity of -4.61% beat Workiva's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets JFrog -10.93% -4.61% -3.11% Workiva 1.53% -68.43% 1.47%

Does the media prefer FROG or WK?

In the previous week, JFrog had 8 more articles in the media than Workiva. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for JFrog and 6 mentions for Workiva. Workiva's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat JFrog's score of 0.74 indicating that Workiva is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment JFrog 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Workiva 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings & valuation, WK or TEM?

Workiva has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tempus AI. Tempus AI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workiva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Workiva $884.57M 3.61 -$26.17M $0.23 247.33 Tempus AI $1.27B 7.35 -$245.03M -$1.72 N/A

Is WK or TEM more profitable?

Workiva has a net margin of 1.53% compared to Tempus AI's net margin of -22.20%. Tempus AI's return on equity of -53.83% beat Workiva's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Workiva 1.53% -68.43% 1.47% Tempus AI -22.20% -53.83% -11.17%

Does the media prefer WK or TEM?

In the previous week, Tempus AI had 8 more articles in the media than Workiva. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Tempus AI and 6 mentions for Workiva. Tempus AI's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Workiva's score of 0.91 indicating that Tempus AI is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Workiva 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Tempus AI 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, HUBS or WK?

HubSpot has higher revenue and earnings than Workiva. HubSpot is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workiva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio HubSpot $3.13B 3.62 $45.91M $1.91 115.75 Workiva $884.57M 3.61 -$26.17M $0.23 247.33

Is HUBS or WK more profitable?

HubSpot has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Workiva's net margin of 1.53%. HubSpot's return on equity of 5.66% beat Workiva's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets HubSpot 3.04% 5.66% 3.04% Workiva 1.53% -68.43% 1.47%

Does the media refer more to HUBS or WK?

In the previous week, HubSpot had 7 more articles in the media than Workiva. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for HubSpot and 6 mentions for Workiva. Workiva's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat HubSpot's score of 0.81 indicating that Workiva is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment HubSpot 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Workiva 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings & valuation, WK or FIG?

Workiva has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Figma. Figma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workiva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Workiva $884.57M 3.61 -$26.17M $0.23 247.33 Figma $1.06B 10.08 -$1.25B -$3.43 N/A

Is WK or FIG more profitable?

Workiva has a net margin of 1.53% compared to Figma's net margin of -123.83%. Workiva's return on equity of -68.43% beat Figma's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Workiva 1.53% -68.43% 1.47% Figma -123.83% -98.51% -61.42%

Does the media prefer WK or FIG?

In the previous week, Figma had 7 more articles in the media than Workiva. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Figma and 6 mentions for Workiva. Workiva's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Figma's score of 0.83 indicating that Workiva is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Workiva 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Figma 5 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Workiva (WK) Competitors

$56.88 -0.09 (-0.15%)

As of 12:45 PM Eastern

Compare

WK vs. BL, FROG, TEM, HUBS, and FIG

Should you buy Workiva stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Workiva with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Workiva include BlackLine (BL), JFrog (FROG), Tempus AI (TEM), HubSpot (HUBS), and Figma (FIG). These companies are all part of the "computer software" industry.

How does Workiva compare to BlackLine?

Workiva (NYSE:WK) and BlackLine (NASDAQ:BL) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

BlackLine has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Workiva. BlackLine is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workiva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Workiva	$884.57M	3.61	-$26.17M	$0.23	247.33
BlackLine	$700.43M	2.51	$24.17M	$0.43	69.69

In the previous week, Workiva had 3 more articles in the media than BlackLine. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Workiva and 3 mentions for BlackLine. Workiva's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat BlackLine's score of 0.78 indicating that Workiva is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Workiva	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
BlackLine	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Workiva currently has a consensus target price of $88.50, suggesting a potential upside of 55.58%. BlackLine has a consensus target price of $43.25, suggesting a potential upside of 44.34%. Given Workiva's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Workiva is more favorable than BlackLine.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Workiva	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
BlackLine	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.21

BlackLine has a net margin of 3.71% compared to Workiva's net margin of 1.53%. BlackLine's return on equity of 18.86% beat Workiva's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Workiva	1.53%	-68.43%	1.47%
BlackLine	3.71%	18.86%	3.88%

92.2% of Workiva shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.1% of BlackLine shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Workiva shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of BlackLine shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Workiva has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BlackLine has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Workiva and BlackLine tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Workiva compare to JFrog?

JFrog (NASDAQ:FROG) and Workiva (NYSE:WK) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

85.0% of JFrog shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of Workiva shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.8% of JFrog shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Workiva shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Workiva has a net margin of 1.53% compared to JFrog's net margin of -10.93%. JFrog's return on equity of -4.61% beat Workiva's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
JFrog	-10.93%	-4.61%	-3.11%
Workiva	1.53%	-68.43%	1.47%

In the previous week, JFrog had 8 more articles in the media than Workiva. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for JFrog and 6 mentions for Workiva. Workiva's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat JFrog's score of 0.74 indicating that Workiva is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
JFrog	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Workiva	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

JFrog has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Workiva has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Workiva has higher revenue and earnings than JFrog. JFrog is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workiva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
JFrog	$531.84M	19.77	-$71.82M	-$0.53	N/A
Workiva	$884.57M	3.61	-$26.17M	$0.23	247.33

JFrog currently has a consensus target price of $84.86, suggesting a potential downside of 2.25%. Workiva has a consensus target price of $88.50, suggesting a potential upside of 55.58%. Given Workiva's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Workiva is more favorable than JFrog.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
JFrog	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.87
Workiva	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Summary

Workiva beats JFrog on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Workiva compare to Tempus AI?

Workiva (NYSE:WK) and Tempus AI (NASDAQ:TEM) are both mid-cap computer software companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Workiva has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tempus AI has a beta of 3.46, suggesting that its share price is 246% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tempus AI had 8 more articles in the media than Workiva. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Tempus AI and 6 mentions for Workiva. Tempus AI's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Workiva's score of 0.91 indicating that Tempus AI is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Workiva	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Tempus AI	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Workiva has a net margin of 1.53% compared to Tempus AI's net margin of -22.20%. Tempus AI's return on equity of -53.83% beat Workiva's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Workiva	1.53%	-68.43%	1.47%
Tempus AI	-22.20%	-53.83%	-11.17%

Workiva has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tempus AI. Tempus AI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workiva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Workiva	$884.57M	3.61	-$26.17M	$0.23	247.33
Tempus AI	$1.27B	7.35	-$245.03M	-$1.72	N/A

Workiva presently has a consensus price target of $88.50, indicating a potential upside of 55.58%. Tempus AI has a consensus price target of $68.92, indicating a potential upside of 32.33%. Given Workiva's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Workiva is more favorable than Tempus AI.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Workiva	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Tempus AI	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.47

92.2% of Workiva shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.2% of Tempus AI shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Workiva shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 24.3% of Tempus AI shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Workiva beats Tempus AI on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Workiva compare to HubSpot?

HubSpot (NYSE:HUBS) and Workiva (NYSE:WK) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, HubSpot had 7 more articles in the media than Workiva. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for HubSpot and 6 mentions for Workiva. Workiva's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat HubSpot's score of 0.81 indicating that Workiva is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
HubSpot	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Workiva	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

HubSpot has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Workiva has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

HubSpot has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Workiva's net margin of 1.53%. HubSpot's return on equity of 5.66% beat Workiva's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HubSpot	3.04%	5.66%	3.04%
Workiva	1.53%	-68.43%	1.47%

HubSpot presently has a consensus target price of $311.00, suggesting a potential upside of 40.67%. Workiva has a consensus target price of $88.50, suggesting a potential upside of 55.58%. Given Workiva's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Workiva is more favorable than HubSpot.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HubSpot	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70
Workiva	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

HubSpot has higher revenue and earnings than Workiva. HubSpot is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workiva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HubSpot	$3.13B	3.62	$45.91M	$1.91	115.75
Workiva	$884.57M	3.61	-$26.17M	$0.23	247.33

90.4% of HubSpot shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of Workiva shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of HubSpot shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Workiva shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

HubSpot beats Workiva on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Workiva compare to Figma?

Workiva (NYSE:WK) and Figma (NYSE:FIG) are both computer software companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

In the previous week, Figma had 7 more articles in the media than Workiva. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Figma and 6 mentions for Workiva. Workiva's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Figma's score of 0.83 indicating that Workiva is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Workiva	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Figma	5 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Workiva has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Figma. Figma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workiva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Workiva	$884.57M	3.61	-$26.17M	$0.23	247.33
Figma	$1.06B	10.08	-$1.25B	-$3.43	N/A

Workiva presently has a consensus target price of $88.50, indicating a potential upside of 55.58%. Figma has a consensus target price of $32.67, indicating a potential upside of 36.77%. Given Workiva's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Workiva is more favorable than Figma.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Workiva	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Figma	1 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

92.2% of Workiva shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of Workiva shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 32.3% of Figma shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Workiva has a net margin of 1.53% compared to Figma's net margin of -123.83%. Workiva's return on equity of -68.43% beat Figma's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Workiva	1.53%	-68.43%	1.47%
Figma	-123.83%	-98.51%	-61.42%

Summary

Workiva beats Figma on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Workiva News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

WK vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Workiva	INTERNET SOFTWARE Industry	Computer Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$3.19B	$17.45B	$37.60B	$23.43B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.71%	3.14%	4.19%
P/E Ratio	247.37	67.47	77.25	30.92
Price / Sales	3.61	35.23	594.23	19.87
Price / Cash	N/A	82.33	45.98	33.10
Price / Book	-568.85	6.63	9.29	4.77
Net Income	-$26.17M	$385.08M	$1.07B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	9.07%	-2.61%	-2.71%	0.19%
1 Month Performance	18.80%	4.84%	-2.39%	1.83%
1 Year Performance	-14.32%	-14.46%	135.99%	16.71%

Workiva Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
WK Workiva	4.2514 of 5 stars	$56.89 -0.1%	$88.50 +55.6%	-13.3%	$3.19B	$884.57M	247.37	2,860
BL BlackLine	3.7689 of 5 stars	$29.10 -2.6%	$43.67 +50.1%	-45.0%	$1.75B	$700.43M	67.67	1,850	Gap Up
FROG JFrog	1.6839 of 5 stars	$98.10 +3.5%	$82.48 -15.9%	+114.7%	$11.48B	$531.84M	N/A	1,800	Analyst Forecast Short Interest Increase Gap Down
TEM Tempus AI	3.9353 of 5 stars	$60.70 +0.7%	$68.54 +12.9%	-10.6%	$10.82B	$1.27B	N/A	3,800	Positive News Analyst Forecast Gap Down
HUBS HubSpot	4.5054 of 5 stars	$193.82 +0.9%	$311.00 +60.5%	-58.5%	$9.84B	$3.13B	101.48	8,882	Analyst Forecast Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:WK) was last updated on 7/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Workiva (WK) Competitors