Which has stronger earnings and valuation, WK or GDDY?

GoDaddy has higher revenue and earnings than Workiva. GoDaddy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workiva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Workiva $925.59M 2.97 -$26.17M $0.23 213.19 GoDaddy $5.02B 2.23 $875M $6.32 13.39

Is WK or GDDY more profitable?

GoDaddy has a net margin of 17.32% compared to Workiva's net margin of 1.53%. GoDaddy's return on equity of 366.90% beat Workiva's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Workiva 1.53% -68.43% 1.47% GoDaddy 17.32% 366.90% 10.73%

Does the media prefer WK or GDDY?

In the previous week, GoDaddy had 10 more articles in the media than Workiva. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for GoDaddy and 4 mentions for Workiva. GoDaddy's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Workiva's score of 0.33 indicating that GoDaddy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Workiva 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral GoDaddy 3 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, HUBS or WK?

HubSpot has higher revenue and earnings than Workiva. HubSpot is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workiva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio HubSpot $3.30B 2.87 $45.91M $1.91 96.66 Workiva $925.59M 2.97 -$26.17M $0.23 213.19

Is HUBS or WK more profitable?

HubSpot has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Workiva's net margin of 1.53%. HubSpot's return on equity of 5.66% beat Workiva's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets HubSpot 3.04% 5.66% 3.04% Workiva 1.53% -68.43% 1.47%

Does the media refer more to HUBS or WK?

In the previous week, HubSpot had 10 more articles in the media than Workiva. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for HubSpot and 4 mentions for Workiva. HubSpot's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Workiva's score of 0.33 indicating that HubSpot is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment HubSpot 4 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Workiva 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, WK or FROG?

Workiva has higher revenue and earnings than JFrog. JFrog is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workiva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Workiva $925.59M 2.97 -$26.17M $0.23 213.19 JFrog $531.84M 19.93 -$71.82M -$0.53 N/A

Is WK or FROG more profitable?

Workiva has a net margin of 1.53% compared to JFrog's net margin of -10.93%. JFrog's return on equity of -4.61% beat Workiva's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Workiva 1.53% -68.43% 1.47% JFrog -10.93% -4.61% -3.11%

Does the media prefer WK or FROG?

In the previous week, JFrog had 4 more articles in the media than Workiva. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for JFrog and 4 mentions for Workiva. JFrog's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Workiva's score of 0.33 indicating that JFrog is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Workiva 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral JFrog 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings & valuation, WK or TTD?

Trade Desk has higher revenue and earnings than Workiva. Trade Desk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workiva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Workiva $925.59M 2.97 -$26.17M $0.23 213.19 Trade Desk $2.97B 2.91 $443.30M $0.88 20.88

Is WK or TTD more profitable?

Trade Desk has a net margin of 14.57% compared to Workiva's net margin of 1.53%. Trade Desk's return on equity of 16.91% beat Workiva's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Workiva 1.53% -68.43% 1.47% Trade Desk 14.57% 16.91% 7.28%

Does the media prefer WK or TTD?

In the previous week, Trade Desk had 10 more articles in the media than Workiva. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Trade Desk and 4 mentions for Workiva. Trade Desk's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Workiva's score of 0.33 indicating that Trade Desk is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Workiva 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Trade Desk 4 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, BSY or WK?

Bentley Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Workiva. Bentley Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workiva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Bentley Systems $1.50B 5.84 $277.86M $0.88 34.09 Workiva $925.59M 2.97 -$26.17M $0.23 213.19

Is BSY or WK more profitable?

Bentley Systems has a net margin of 18.12% compared to Workiva's net margin of 1.53%. Bentley Systems' return on equity of 28.65% beat Workiva's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Bentley Systems 18.12% 28.65% 9.79% Workiva 1.53% -68.43% 1.47%

Does the media refer more to BSY or WK?

In the previous week, Workiva had 2 more articles in the media than Bentley Systems. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Workiva and 2 mentions for Bentley Systems. Bentley Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Workiva's score of 0.33 indicating that Bentley Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Bentley Systems 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Workiva 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Workiva (WK) Competitors

$49.03 +2.72 (+5.88%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$49.04 +0.01 (+0.01%)

As of 04:31 PM Eastern

Compare

WK vs. GDDY, HUBS, FROG, TTD, and BSY

Should you buy Workiva stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Workiva with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Workiva include GoDaddy (GDDY), HubSpot (HUBS), JFrog (FROG), Trade Desk (TTD), and Bentley Systems (BSY). These companies are all part of the "computer software" industry.

How does Workiva compare to GoDaddy?

Workiva (NYSE:WK) and GoDaddy (NYSE:GDDY) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Workiva has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GoDaddy has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

92.2% of Workiva shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.3% of GoDaddy shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Workiva shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of GoDaddy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

GoDaddy has higher revenue and earnings than Workiva. GoDaddy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workiva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Workiva	$925.59M	2.97	-$26.17M	$0.23	213.19
GoDaddy	$5.02B	2.23	$875M	$6.32	13.39

Workiva currently has a consensus target price of $88.50, indicating a potential upside of 80.49%. GoDaddy has a consensus target price of $118.43, indicating a potential upside of 39.93%. Given Workiva's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Workiva is more favorable than GoDaddy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Workiva	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
GoDaddy	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.53

GoDaddy has a net margin of 17.32% compared to Workiva's net margin of 1.53%. GoDaddy's return on equity of 366.90% beat Workiva's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Workiva	1.53%	-68.43%	1.47%
GoDaddy	17.32%	366.90%	10.73%

In the previous week, GoDaddy had 10 more articles in the media than Workiva. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for GoDaddy and 4 mentions for Workiva. GoDaddy's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Workiva's score of 0.33 indicating that GoDaddy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Workiva	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
GoDaddy	3 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

GoDaddy beats Workiva on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Workiva compare to HubSpot?

HubSpot (NYSE:HUBS) and Workiva (NYSE:WK) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and profitability.

HubSpot has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Workiva has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

90.4% of HubSpot shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of Workiva shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of HubSpot shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Workiva shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

HubSpot presently has a consensus price target of $311.00, suggesting a potential upside of 68.45%. Workiva has a consensus price target of $88.50, suggesting a potential upside of 80.49%. Given Workiva's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Workiva is more favorable than HubSpot.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HubSpot	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Workiva	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92

HubSpot has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Workiva's net margin of 1.53%. HubSpot's return on equity of 5.66% beat Workiva's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HubSpot	3.04%	5.66%	3.04%
Workiva	1.53%	-68.43%	1.47%

In the previous week, HubSpot had 10 more articles in the media than Workiva. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for HubSpot and 4 mentions for Workiva. HubSpot's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Workiva's score of 0.33 indicating that HubSpot is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
HubSpot	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Workiva	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

HubSpot has higher revenue and earnings than Workiva. HubSpot is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workiva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HubSpot	$3.30B	2.87	$45.91M	$1.91	96.66
Workiva	$925.59M	2.97	-$26.17M	$0.23	213.19

Summary

HubSpot beats Workiva on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Workiva compare to JFrog?

Workiva (NYSE:WK) and JFrog (NASDAQ:FROG) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Workiva has higher revenue and earnings than JFrog. JFrog is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workiva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Workiva	$925.59M	2.97	-$26.17M	$0.23	213.19
JFrog	$531.84M	19.93	-$71.82M	-$0.53	N/A

Workiva presently has a consensus target price of $88.50, indicating a potential upside of 80.49%. JFrog has a consensus target price of $81.62, indicating a potential downside of 6.72%. Given Workiva's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Workiva is more favorable than JFrog.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Workiva	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
JFrog	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.87

92.2% of Workiva shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.0% of JFrog shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of Workiva shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.8% of JFrog shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, JFrog had 4 more articles in the media than Workiva. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for JFrog and 4 mentions for Workiva. JFrog's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Workiva's score of 0.33 indicating that JFrog is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Workiva	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
JFrog	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Workiva has a net margin of 1.53% compared to JFrog's net margin of -10.93%. JFrog's return on equity of -4.61% beat Workiva's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Workiva	1.53%	-68.43%	1.47%
JFrog	-10.93%	-4.61%	-3.11%

Workiva has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JFrog has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Workiva beats JFrog on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Workiva compare to Trade Desk?

Workiva (NYSE:WK) and Trade Desk (NASDAQ:TTD) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, dividends and risk.

Workiva currently has a consensus target price of $88.50, suggesting a potential upside of 80.49%. Trade Desk has a consensus target price of $33.91, suggesting a potential upside of 84.60%. Given Trade Desk's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Trade Desk is more favorable than Workiva.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Workiva	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
Trade Desk	5 Sell rating(s)	21 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.21

Workiva has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trade Desk has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Trade Desk had 10 more articles in the media than Workiva. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Trade Desk and 4 mentions for Workiva. Trade Desk's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Workiva's score of 0.33 indicating that Trade Desk is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Workiva	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Trade Desk	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

92.2% of Workiva shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.8% of Trade Desk shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of Workiva shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.4% of Trade Desk shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Trade Desk has higher revenue and earnings than Workiva. Trade Desk is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workiva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Workiva	$925.59M	2.97	-$26.17M	$0.23	213.19
Trade Desk	$2.97B	2.91	$443.30M	$0.88	20.88

Trade Desk has a net margin of 14.57% compared to Workiva's net margin of 1.53%. Trade Desk's return on equity of 16.91% beat Workiva's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Workiva	1.53%	-68.43%	1.47%
Trade Desk	14.57%	16.91%	7.28%

Summary

Trade Desk beats Workiva on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Workiva compare to Bentley Systems?

Bentley Systems (NASDAQ:BSY) and Workiva (NYSE:WK) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Bentley Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Workiva. Bentley Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workiva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bentley Systems	$1.50B	5.84	$277.86M	$0.88	34.09
Workiva	$925.59M	2.97	-$26.17M	$0.23	213.19

Bentley Systems has a net margin of 18.12% compared to Workiva's net margin of 1.53%. Bentley Systems' return on equity of 28.65% beat Workiva's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bentley Systems	18.12%	28.65%	9.79%
Workiva	1.53%	-68.43%	1.47%

44.2% of Bentley Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of Workiva shares are held by institutional investors. 20.3% of Bentley Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Workiva shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Bentley Systems presently has a consensus target price of $46.50, suggesting a potential upside of 55.00%. Workiva has a consensus target price of $88.50, suggesting a potential upside of 80.49%. Given Workiva's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Workiva is more favorable than Bentley Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bentley Systems	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Workiva	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92

Bentley Systems has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Workiva has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Workiva had 2 more articles in the media than Bentley Systems. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Workiva and 2 mentions for Bentley Systems. Bentley Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Workiva's score of 0.33 indicating that Bentley Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bentley Systems	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Workiva	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Bentley Systems beats Workiva on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Workiva News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

WK vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Workiva	INTERNET SOFTWARE Industry	Computer Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$2.75B	$15.86B	$37.41B	$23.29B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.54%	3.30%	4.11%
P/E Ratio	213.19	62.22	79.70	31.66
Price / Sales	2.97	26.27	611.96	20.32
Price / Cash	N/A	67.72	46.33	24.53
Price / Book	-490.33	6.38	9.55	4.74
Net Income	-$26.17M	$384.51M	$1.07B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	3.77%	0.98%	-1.06%	0.99%
1 Month Performance	-0.28%	-2.27%	0.03%	0.96%
1 Year Performance	-25.46%	-9.33%	154.19%	24.40%

Workiva Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
WK Workiva	4.0424 of 5 stars	$49.03 +5.9%	$88.50 +80.5%	-29.0%	$2.75B	$925.59M	213.19	2,860	Upcoming Earnings High Trading Volume
GDDY GoDaddy	4.9861 of 5 stars	$77.35 +1.5%	$120.57 +55.9%	-55.3%	$10.09B	$4.95B	12.24	5,845
HUBS HubSpot	4.4927 of 5 stars	$186.08 -1.0%	$311.00 +67.1%	-68.7%	$9.63B	$3.13B	97.43	8,882	Analyst Forecast
FROG JFrog	2.0135 of 5 stars	$80.39 +3.4%	$78.45 -2.4%	+80.8%	$9.42B	$531.84M	N/A	1,800	Analyst Forecast
TTD Trade Desk	4.8909 of 5 stars	$19.27 -0.1%	$33.91 +76.0%	-75.2%	$9.06B	$2.90B	21.90	3,843

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:WK) was last updated on 6/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Workiva (WK) Competitors