Go Pro

3 E Network Technology Group (MASK) Competitors

3 E Network Technology Group logo
$0.90 -0.01 (-0.55%)
As of 12:56 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

MASK vs. HTCR, CSAI, RMSG, BNZI, and MLGO

Should you buy 3 E Network Technology Group stock or one of its competitors? 3 E Network Technology Group's main competitors and comparable companies include HeartCore Enterprises (HTCR), Cloudastructure (CSAI), Real Messenger (RMSG), Banzai International (BNZI), and MicroAlgo (MLGO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "application software" industry.

How does 3 E Network Technology Group compare to HeartCore Enterprises?

HeartCore Enterprises (NASDAQ:HTCR) and 3 E Network Technology Group (NASDAQ:MASK) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, 3 E Network Technology Group had 7 more articles in the media than HeartCore Enterprises. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for 3 E Network Technology Group and 1 mentions for HeartCore Enterprises. 3 E Network Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat HeartCore Enterprises' score of 0.00 indicating that 3 E Network Technology Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
HeartCore Enterprises
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
3 E Network Technology Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

HeartCore Enterprises has higher revenue and earnings than 3 E Network Technology Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HeartCore Enterprises$8.97M0.35$5.79M-$4.21N/A
3 E Network Technology Group$4.84M0.16$760KN/AN/A

HeartCore Enterprises has a beta of 1.65, indicating that its share price is 65% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3 E Network Technology Group has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

1.7% of HeartCore Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. 36.1% of HeartCore Enterprises shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

HeartCore Enterprises has a net margin of 15.42% compared to 3 E Network Technology Group's net margin of 0.00%. 3 E Network Technology Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat HeartCore Enterprises' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
HeartCore Enterprises15.42% -138.90% -53.97%
3 E Network Technology Group N/A N/A N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
HeartCore Enterprises
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

HeartCore Enterprises beats 3 E Network Technology Group on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3 E Network Technology Group compare to Cloudastructure?

3 E Network Technology Group (NASDAQ:MASK) and Cloudastructure (NASDAQ:CSAI) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

3 E Network Technology Group has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cloudastructure has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

3 E Network Technology Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cloudastructure.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3 E Network Technology Group$4.84M0.16$760KN/AN/A
Cloudastructure$5.07M0.60-$8.46M-$14.33N/A

Cloudastructure has a consensus price target of $45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1,196.83%. Given Cloudastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cloudastructure is more favorable than 3 E Network Technology Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Cloudastructure
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

3 E Network Technology Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cloudastructure's net margin of -145.25%. 3 E Network Technology Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Cloudastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
3 E Network Technology GroupN/A N/A N/A
Cloudastructure -145.25%-167.05%-103.30%

In the previous week, 3 E Network Technology Group had 7 more articles in the media than Cloudastructure. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for 3 E Network Technology Group and 1 mentions for Cloudastructure. 3 E Network Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Cloudastructure's score of 0.00 indicating that 3 E Network Technology Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
3 E Network Technology Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Cloudastructure
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

3 E Network Technology Group beats Cloudastructure on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3 E Network Technology Group compare to Real Messenger?

Real Messenger (NASDAQ:RMSG) and 3 E Network Technology Group (NASDAQ:MASK) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, 3 E Network Technology Group had 8 more articles in the media than Real Messenger. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for 3 E Network Technology Group and 0 mentions for Real Messenger. 3 E Network Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Real Messenger's score of 0.00 indicating that 3 E Network Technology Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Real Messenger Neutral
3 E Network Technology Group Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Real Messenger
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Real MessengerN/A N/A N/A
3 E Network Technology Group N/A N/A N/A

3 E Network Technology Group has higher revenue and earnings than Real Messenger.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Real Messenger$30K106.40-$4.09M-$0.01N/A
3 E Network Technology Group$4.84M0.16$760KN/AN/A

37.4% of Real Messenger shares are owned by institutional investors. 46.6% of Real Messenger shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Real Messenger has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3 E Network Technology Group has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

3 E Network Technology Group beats Real Messenger on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3 E Network Technology Group compare to Banzai International?

Banzai International (NASDAQ:BNZI) and 3 E Network Technology Group (NASDAQ:MASK) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, 3 E Network Technology Group had 8 more articles in the media than Banzai International. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for 3 E Network Technology Group and 0 mentions for Banzai International. 3 E Network Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat Banzai International's score of 0.00 indicating that 3 E Network Technology Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Banzai International Neutral
3 E Network Technology Group Neutral

96.8% of Banzai International shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Banzai International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Banzai International has a beta of -1, suggesting that its share price is 200% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3 E Network Technology Group has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

3 E Network Technology Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Banzai International's net margin of -237.54%. 3 E Network Technology Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Banzai International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Banzai International-237.54% -391.73% -74.14%
3 E Network Technology Group N/A N/A N/A

3 E Network Technology Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Banzai International.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Banzai International$11.48M0.24-$22.49M-$110.47N/A
3 E Network Technology Group$4.84M0.16$760KN/AN/A

Banzai International currently has a consensus price target of $42.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2,098.95%. Given Banzai International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Banzai International is more favorable than 3 E Network Technology Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Banzai International
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Banzai International and 3 E Network Technology Group tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3 E Network Technology Group compare to MicroAlgo?

3 E Network Technology Group (NASDAQ:MASK) and MicroAlgo (NASDAQ:MLGO) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, risk and dividends.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
MicroAlgo
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, 3 E Network Technology Group had 8 more articles in the media than MicroAlgo. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for 3 E Network Technology Group and 0 mentions for MicroAlgo. 3 E Network Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat MicroAlgo's score of 0.00 indicating that 3 E Network Technology Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
3 E Network Technology Group Neutral
MicroAlgo Neutral

MicroAlgo has higher revenue and earnings than 3 E Network Technology Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3 E Network Technology Group$4.84M0.16$760KN/AN/A
MicroAlgo$60.04M0.04$16.21M-$540.54N/A

3 E Network Technology Group has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MicroAlgo has a beta of -0.88, meaning that its share price is 188% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
3 E Network Technology GroupN/A N/A N/A
MicroAlgo N/A N/A N/A

1.1% of MicroAlgo shares are held by institutional investors. 22.7% of MicroAlgo shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

3 E Network Technology Group and MicroAlgo tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get 3 E Network Technology Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MASK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MASK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MASK vs. The Competition

Metric3 E Network Technology GroupSoftware IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$794K$15.93B$30.82B$13.08B
Dividend YieldN/A3.41%2.75%13.00%
P/E RatioN/A142.6178.9425.72
Price / Sales0.161,285.29589.8485.59
Price / Cash0.3046.9249.3552.02
Price / Book0.088.857.996.31
Net Income$760K$433.53M$702.33M$359.73M
7 Day Performance-2.81%1.68%2.59%1.56%
1 Month Performance-38.64%-1.42%-1.62%-3.48%
1 Year Performance-94.34%-0.34%177.71%5.68%

3 E Network Technology Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MASK
3 E Network Technology Group
0.9059 of 5 stars
$0.87
-4.3%
N/A-94.4%$764K$4.84MN/A13
HTCR
HeartCore Enterprises
0.9072 of 5 stars
$2.00
-2.7%
N/A-88.4%$3.10M$8.97MN/A40
CSAI
Cloudastructure
2.0592 of 5 stars
$3.23
-4.4%
$45.00
+1,293.2%
-92.8%$2.94M$5.07MN/A20
RMSG
Real Messenger
N/A$0.28
+2.9%
N/A-89.2%$2.92M$30KN/AN/A
BNZI
Banzai International
1.7355 of 5 stars
$1.91
flat
$42.00
+2,099.0%
N/A$2.78M$11.48MN/A12

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:MASK) was last updated on 9/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners