Go Pro

3 E Network Technology Group (MASK) Competitors

3 E Network Technology Group logo
$1.97 -0.18 (-8.37%)
Closing price 06/26/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.92 -0.04 (-2.28%)
As of 06/26/2026 07:57 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

MASK vs. IDAI, CSAI, MTBLY, LCFY, and ORKT

Should you buy 3 E Network Technology Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares 3 E Network Technology Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with 3 E Network Technology Group include T Stamp (IDAI), Cloudastructure (CSAI), Moatable (MTBLY), Locafy (LCFY), and Orangekloud Technology (ORKT). These companies are all part of the "computer software" industry.

How does 3 E Network Technology Group compare to T Stamp?

3 E Network Technology Group (NASDAQ:MASK) and T Stamp (NASDAQ:IDAI) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

3 E Network Technology Group has higher revenue and earnings than T Stamp.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3 E Network Technology Group$4.84M0.36$760KN/AN/A
T Stamp$3.14M2.64-$8.32M-$2.22N/A

3 E Network Technology Group has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, T Stamp has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

3 E Network Technology Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to T Stamp's net margin of -250.57%. 3 E Network Technology Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat T Stamp's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
3 E Network Technology GroupN/A N/A N/A
T Stamp -250.57%-134.07%-88.82%

In the previous week, 3 E Network Technology Group had 2 more articles in the media than T Stamp. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for 3 E Network Technology Group and 3 mentions for T Stamp. T Stamp's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat 3 E Network Technology Group's score of 0.87 indicating that T Stamp is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
3 E Network Technology Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
T Stamp
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

16.3% of T Stamp shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of T Stamp shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

T Stamp has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 710.81%. Given T Stamp's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe T Stamp is more favorable than 3 E Network Technology Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
T Stamp
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

3 E Network Technology Group and T Stamp tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3 E Network Technology Group compare to Cloudastructure?

Cloudastructure (NASDAQ:CSAI) and 3 E Network Technology Group (NASDAQ:MASK) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

3 E Network Technology Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cloudastructure.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cloudastructure$5.07M1.56-$8.46M-$0.40N/A
3 E Network Technology Group$4.84M0.36$760KN/AN/A

Cloudastructure has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3 E Network Technology Group has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Cloudastructure presently has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1,793.34%. Given Cloudastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Cloudastructure is more favorable than 3 E Network Technology Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cloudastructure
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

3 E Network Technology Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cloudastructure's net margin of -166.26%. 3 E Network Technology Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Cloudastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cloudastructure-166.26% -109.93% -93.94%
3 E Network Technology Group N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, 3 E Network Technology Group had 1 more articles in the media than Cloudastructure. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for 3 E Network Technology Group and 4 mentions for Cloudastructure. 3 E Network Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Cloudastructure's score of 0.47 indicating that 3 E Network Technology Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cloudastructure
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
3 E Network Technology Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

3 E Network Technology Group beats Cloudastructure on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3 E Network Technology Group compare to Moatable?

Moatable (NYSE:MTBLY) and 3 E Network Technology Group (NASDAQ:MASK) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

14.5% of Moatable shares are owned by institutional investors. 42.4% of Moatable shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

3 E Network Technology Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Moatable's net margin of -1.97%. 3 E Network Technology Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Moatable's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Moatable-1.97% -2.47% -1.69%
3 E Network Technology Group N/A N/A N/A

Moatable has a beta of 9.61, indicating that its stock price is 861% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3 E Network Technology Group has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, 3 E Network Technology Group had 5 more articles in the media than Moatable. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for 3 E Network Technology Group and 0 mentions for Moatable. 3 E Network Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Moatable's score of 0.00 indicating that 3 E Network Technology Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Moatable Neutral
3 E Network Technology Group Positive

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Moatable
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

3 E Network Technology Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Moatable.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Moatable$52.07M0.13-$8.99M-$0.14N/A
3 E Network Technology Group$4.84M0.36$760KN/AN/A

Summary

3 E Network Technology Group beats Moatable on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3 E Network Technology Group compare to Locafy?

3 E Network Technology Group (NASDAQ:MASK) and Locafy (NASDAQ:LCFY) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and risk.

3 E Network Technology Group has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Locafy has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
3 E Network Technology GroupN/A N/A N/A
Locafy N/A N/A N/A

0.0% of Locafy shares are held by institutional investors. 28.7% of Locafy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, 3 E Network Technology Group and 3 E Network Technology Group both had 5 articles in the media. Locafy's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat 3 E Network Technology Group's score of 0.87 indicating that Locafy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
3 E Network Technology Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Locafy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

3 E Network Technology Group has higher revenue and earnings than Locafy.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3 E Network Technology Group$4.84M0.36$760KN/AN/A
Locafy$2.07M3.11-$2.79M-$1.04N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Locafy
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Locafy beats 3 E Network Technology Group on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3 E Network Technology Group compare to Orangekloud Technology?

Orangekloud Technology (NASDAQ:ORKT) and 3 E Network Technology Group (NASDAQ:MASK) are both small-cap computer software companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, 3 E Network Technology Group had 4 more articles in the media than Orangekloud Technology. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for 3 E Network Technology Group and 1 mentions for Orangekloud Technology. Orangekloud Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat 3 E Network Technology Group's score of 0.87 indicating that Orangekloud Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Orangekloud Technology Very Positive
3 E Network Technology Group Positive

Orangekloud Technology has a beta of 2.94, indicating that its stock price is 194% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3 E Network Technology Group has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

3 E Network Technology Group has higher revenue and earnings than Orangekloud Technology.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Orangekloud Technology$4.42M1.44-$3.48MN/AN/A
3 E Network Technology Group$4.84M0.36$760KN/AN/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Orangekloud Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Orangekloud TechnologyN/A N/A N/A
3 E Network Technology Group N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Orangekloud Technology beats 3 E Network Technology Group on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get 3 E Network Technology Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MASK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MASK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MASK vs. The Competition

Metric3 E Network Technology GroupIT Services IndustryComputer SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.73M$11.71B$37.77B$12.19B
Dividend YieldN/A2.73%3.30%6.11%
P/E RatioN/A45.06171.6224.16
Price / Sales0.367.12625.74102.81
Price / Cash0.6722.7446.0036.93
Price / Book0.183.159.576.38
Net Income$760K$534.00M$1.07B$337.00M
7 Day Performance-14.35%1.46%-0.19%0.10%
1 Month Performance-52.30%-9.55%-1.82%-1.28%
1 Year Performance-96.45%-22.88%155.52%27.68%

3 E Network Technology Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MASK
3 E Network Technology Group
1.2554 of 5 stars
$1.97
-8.4%
N/A-96.5%$1.73M$4.84MN/A22
IDAI
T Stamp
3.5649 of 5 stars
$1.48
+12.1%
$12.00
+710.8%
-44.2%$7.39M$3.14MN/A90
CSAI
Cloudastructure
3.0683 of 5 stars
$0.32
+14.8%
$6.00
+1,793.3%
-83.3%$6.90M$5.07MN/A20
MTBLY
Moatable
N/A$0.41
flat
N/AN/A$6.73M$52.07MN/A410
LCFY
Locafy
1.5729 of 5 stars
$3.58
-4.3%
N/A-56.9%$6.73M$2.07MN/A50

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:MASK) was last updated on 6/28/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners