Go Pro

3 E Network Technology Group (MASK) Competitors

3 E Network Technology Group logo
$1.38 +0.01 (+0.73%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.39 +0.01 (+0.65%)
As of 07:51 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

MASK vs. IFBD, RIME, CSAI, HTCR, and RMSG

Should you buy 3 E Network Technology Group stock or one of its competitors? 3 E Network Technology Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Infobird (IFBD), Algorhythm (RIME), Cloudastructure (CSAI), HeartCore Enterprises (HTCR), and Real Messenger (RMSG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "application software" industry.

How does 3 E Network Technology Group compare to Infobird?

3 E Network Technology Group (NASDAQ:MASK) and Infobird (NASDAQ:IFBD) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

In the previous week, 3 E Network Technology Group had 2 more articles in the media than Infobird. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for 3 E Network Technology Group and 1 mentions for Infobird. 3 E Network Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat Infobird's score of 0.00 indicating that 3 E Network Technology Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
3 E Network Technology Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Infobird
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
3 E Network Technology GroupN/A N/A N/A
Infobird N/A N/A N/A

3 E Network Technology Group has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Infobird has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Infobird
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

2.9% of Infobird shares are held by institutional investors. 35.5% of Infobird shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

3 E Network Technology Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Infobird.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3 E Network Technology Group$4.84M0.25$760KN/AN/A
Infobird$8.71M0.58-$57.19MN/AN/A

Summary

Infobird beats 3 E Network Technology Group on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3 E Network Technology Group compare to Algorhythm?

3 E Network Technology Group (NASDAQ:MASK) and Algorhythm (NASDAQ:RIME) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

3 E Network Technology Group has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Algorhythm has a beta of -0.25, meaning that its stock price is 125% less volatile than the broader market.

3 E Network Technology Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Algorhythm's net margin of -176.39%. 3 E Network Technology Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Algorhythm's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
3 E Network Technology GroupN/A N/A N/A
Algorhythm -176.39%-1,310.33%-101.29%

3 E Network Technology Group has higher revenue and earnings than Algorhythm.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3 E Network Technology Group$4.84M0.25$760KN/AN/A
Algorhythm$4.39M0.97-$15.87M-$1.49N/A

In the previous week, 3 E Network Technology Group had 3 more articles in the media than Algorhythm. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for 3 E Network Technology Group and 0 mentions for Algorhythm. 3 E Network Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat Algorhythm's score of 0.00 indicating that 3 E Network Technology Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
3 E Network Technology Group Neutral
Algorhythm Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Algorhythm
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

Summary

3 E Network Technology Group beats Algorhythm on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3 E Network Technology Group compare to Cloudastructure?

3 E Network Technology Group (NASDAQ:MASK) and Cloudastructure (NASDAQ:CSAI) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, 3 E Network Technology Group had 2 more articles in the media than Cloudastructure. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for 3 E Network Technology Group and 1 mentions for Cloudastructure. 3 E Network Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat Cloudastructure's score of 0.00 indicating that 3 E Network Technology Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
3 E Network Technology Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Cloudastructure
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Cloudastructure has a consensus target price of $45.00, indicating a potential upside of 791.09%. Given Cloudastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cloudastructure is more favorable than 3 E Network Technology Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Cloudastructure
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

3 E Network Technology Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cloudastructure.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3 E Network Technology Group$4.84M0.25$760KN/AN/A
Cloudastructure$5.07M0.87-$8.46M-$14.33N/A

3 E Network Technology Group has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cloudastructure has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

3 E Network Technology Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cloudastructure's net margin of -145.25%. 3 E Network Technology Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Cloudastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
3 E Network Technology GroupN/A N/A N/A
Cloudastructure -145.25%-167.05%-103.30%

Summary

3 E Network Technology Group beats Cloudastructure on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3 E Network Technology Group compare to HeartCore Enterprises?

3 E Network Technology Group (NASDAQ:MASK) and HeartCore Enterprises (NASDAQ:HTCR) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

1.7% of HeartCore Enterprises shares are owned by institutional investors. 36.1% of HeartCore Enterprises shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
HeartCore Enterprises
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

HeartCore Enterprises has higher revenue and earnings than 3 E Network Technology Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3 E Network Technology Group$4.84M0.25$760KN/AN/A
HeartCore Enterprises$8.97M0.40$5.79M-$4.21N/A

HeartCore Enterprises has a net margin of 15.42% compared to 3 E Network Technology Group's net margin of 0.00%. 3 E Network Technology Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat HeartCore Enterprises' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
3 E Network Technology GroupN/A N/A N/A
HeartCore Enterprises 15.42%-138.90%-53.97%

In the previous week, 3 E Network Technology Group had 3 more articles in the media than HeartCore Enterprises. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for 3 E Network Technology Group and 0 mentions for HeartCore Enterprises. 3 E Network Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat HeartCore Enterprises' score of 0.00 indicating that 3 E Network Technology Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
3 E Network Technology Group Neutral
HeartCore Enterprises Neutral

3 E Network Technology Group has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HeartCore Enterprises has a beta of 1.65, indicating that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

HeartCore Enterprises beats 3 E Network Technology Group on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3 E Network Technology Group compare to Real Messenger?

3 E Network Technology Group (NASDAQ:MASK) and Real Messenger (NASDAQ:RMSG) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

37.4% of Real Messenger shares are held by institutional investors. 46.6% of Real Messenger shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Real Messenger
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

3 E Network Technology Group has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Real Messenger has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

3 E Network Technology Group has higher revenue and earnings than Real Messenger.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3 E Network Technology Group$4.84M0.25$760KN/AN/A
Real Messenger$30K125.48-$4.09M-$0.01N/A

In the previous week, 3 E Network Technology Group had 2 more articles in the media than Real Messenger. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for 3 E Network Technology Group and 1 mentions for Real Messenger. Real Messenger's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat 3 E Network Technology Group's score of 0.23 indicating that Real Messenger is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
3 E Network Technology Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Real Messenger
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
3 E Network Technology GroupN/A N/A N/A
Real Messenger N/A N/A N/A

Summary

3 E Network Technology Group beats Real Messenger on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get 3 E Network Technology Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MASK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MASK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MASK vs. The Competition

Metric3 E Network Technology GroupSoftware IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.20M$15.92B$29.39B$12.67B
Dividend YieldN/A3.40%2.74%8.56%
P/E RatioN/A138.8475.3925.25
Price / Sales0.251,290.79590.9292.95
Price / Cash0.4648.1948.2952.08
Price / Book0.137.369.176.10
Net Income$760K$437.25M$678.51M$348.86M
7 Day Performance-1.43%-1.26%-2.06%-1.69%
1 Month Performance-7.38%3.43%1.71%3.57%
1 Year Performance-91.60%3.51%184.48%15.00%

3 E Network Technology Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MASK
3 E Network Technology Group
1.0464 of 5 stars
$1.38
+0.7%
N/A-91.9%$1.20M$4.84MN/A22
IFBD
Infobird
0.4609 of 5 stars
$0.93
+1.8%
N/A-9.6%$4.97M$8.71MN/A390
RIME
Algorhythm
0.5177 of 5 stars
$0.26
-5.2%
N/A-89.1%$4.67M$4.39MN/A27
CSAI
Cloudastructure
2.639 of 5 stars
$5.09
-5.4%
$45.00
+784.1%
-89.1%$4.67M$5.07MN/A20
HTCR
HeartCore Enterprises
1.0038 of 5 stars
$2.58
-2.6%
N/A-89.0%$4.02M$8.97MN/A40

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:MASK) was last updated on 9/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners