Go Pro

3 E Network Technology Group (MASK) Competitors

3 E Network Technology Group logo
$1.51 -0.04 (-2.58%)
As of 10:42 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

MASK vs. LCFY, WORX, BTCT, CSAI, and ENTO

Should you buy 3 E Network Technology Group stock or one of its competitors? 3 E Network Technology Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Locafy (LCFY), SCWorx (WORX), BTC Digital (BTCT), Cloudastructure (CSAI), and Entero Therapeutics (ENTO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "application software" industry.

How does 3 E Network Technology Group compare to Locafy?

3 E Network Technology Group (NASDAQ:MASK) and Locafy (NASDAQ:LCFY) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

3 E Network Technology Group has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Locafy has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its share price is 67% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
3 E Network Technology GroupN/A N/A N/A
Locafy N/A N/A N/A

3 E Network Technology Group has higher revenue and earnings than Locafy.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3 E Network Technology Group$4.84M0.27$760KN/AN/A
Locafy$3.94M1.58-$2.79M-$0.89N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Locafy
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

0.0% of Locafy shares are held by institutional investors. 28.7% of Locafy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Locafy had 1 more articles in the media than 3 E Network Technology Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Locafy and 3 mentions for 3 E Network Technology Group. 3 E Network Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Locafy's score of 0.80 indicating that 3 E Network Technology Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Locafy
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Locafy beats 3 E Network Technology Group on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3 E Network Technology Group compare to SCWorx?

3 E Network Technology Group (NASDAQ:MASK) and SCWorx (NASDAQ:WORX) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, 3 E Network Technology Group had 1 more articles in the media than SCWorx. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for 3 E Network Technology Group and 2 mentions for SCWorx. SCWorx's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat 3 E Network Technology Group's score of 1.23 indicating that SCWorx is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
SCWorx
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

3 E Network Technology Group has higher revenue and earnings than SCWorx.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3 E Network Technology Group$4.84M0.27$760KN/AN/A
SCWorx$2.88M2.04-$4.44M-$9.01N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
SCWorx
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

1.9% of SCWorx shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of SCWorx shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

3 E Network Technology Group has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SCWorx has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

3 E Network Technology Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to SCWorx's net margin of -154.41%. 3 E Network Technology Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat SCWorx's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
3 E Network Technology GroupN/A N/A N/A
SCWorx -154.41%-72.19%-60.48%

Summary

3 E Network Technology Group beats SCWorx on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3 E Network Technology Group compare to BTC Digital?

BTC Digital (NASDAQ:BTCT) and 3 E Network Technology Group (NASDAQ:MASK) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BTC Digital
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

BTC Digital has a beta of 5.5, suggesting that its share price is 450% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3 E Network Technology Group has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BTC DigitalN/A N/A N/A
3 E Network Technology Group N/A N/A N/A

7.3% of BTC Digital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of BTC Digital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, 3 E Network Technology Group had 1 more articles in the media than BTC Digital. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for 3 E Network Technology Group and 2 mentions for BTC Digital. BTC Digital's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat 3 E Network Technology Group's score of 1.23 indicating that BTC Digital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
BTC Digital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

3 E Network Technology Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than BTC Digital.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BTC Digital$14.04M0.31-$9.06M-$1.20N/A
3 E Network Technology Group$4.84M0.27$760KN/AN/A

Summary

BTC Digital beats 3 E Network Technology Group on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3 E Network Technology Group compare to Cloudastructure?

Cloudastructure (NASDAQ:CSAI) and 3 E Network Technology Group (NASDAQ:MASK) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Cloudastructure has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, 3 E Network Technology Group has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Cloudastructure had 4 more articles in the media than 3 E Network Technology Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Cloudastructure and 3 mentions for 3 E Network Technology Group. 3 E Network Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Cloudastructure's score of 0.58 indicating that 3 E Network Technology Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cloudastructure
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Cloudastructure currently has a consensus price target of $45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 727.21%. Given Cloudastructure's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Cloudastructure is more favorable than 3 E Network Technology Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cloudastructure
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

3 E Network Technology Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cloudastructure's net margin of -153.89%. 3 E Network Technology Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Cloudastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cloudastructure-153.89% -140.82% -97.45%
3 E Network Technology Group N/A N/A N/A

3 E Network Technology Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cloudastructure.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cloudastructure$5.07M0.89-$8.46M-$16.22N/A
3 E Network Technology Group$4.84M0.27$760KN/AN/A

Summary

Cloudastructure and 3 E Network Technology Group tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does 3 E Network Technology Group compare to Entero Therapeutics?

3 E Network Technology Group (NASDAQ:MASK) and Entero Therapeutics (NASDAQ:ENTO) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

12.3% of Entero Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Entero Therapeutics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

3 E Network Technology Group has higher revenue and earnings than Entero Therapeutics.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3 E Network Technology Group$4.84M0.27$760KN/AN/A
Entero TherapeuticsN/AN/A-$18.06M-$1.69N/A

3 E Network Technology Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Entero Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
3 E Network Technology GroupN/A N/A N/A
Entero Therapeutics N/A -461.02%-14.72%

In the previous week, 3 E Network Technology Group had 3 more articles in the media than Entero Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for 3 E Network Technology Group and 0 mentions for Entero Therapeutics. 3 E Network Technology Group's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Entero Therapeutics' score of 0.00 indicating that 3 E Network Technology Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
3 E Network Technology Group Positive
Entero Therapeutics Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
3 E Network Technology Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Entero Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

3 E Network Technology Group has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Entero Therapeutics has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

3 E Network Technology Group beats Entero Therapeutics on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get 3 E Network Technology Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MASK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MASK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MASK vs. The Competition

Metric3 E Network Technology GroupSoftware IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.33M$15.87B$30.49B$13.07B
Dividend YieldN/A3.43%2.73%10.74%
P/E RatioN/A127.1575.2125.20
Price / Sales0.271,297.40598.82105.94
Price / Cash0.5547.4951.8550.58
Price / Book0.147.069.466.27
Net Income$760K$437.03M$680.40M$347.55M
7 Day Performance-2.58%1.65%2.96%1.95%
1 Month Performance-16.57%2.47%2.89%1.10%
1 Year Performance-93.68%7.60%197.80%19.62%

3 E Network Technology Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MASK
3 E Network Technology Group
1.2487 of 5 stars
$1.51
-2.6%
N/A-93.8%$1.33M$4.84MN/A22
LCFY
Locafy
0.8698 of 5 stars
$2.38
+5.8%
N/A-36.3%$5.05M$2.07MN/A50
WORX
SCWorx
0.1934 of 5 stars
$4.55
flat
N/A-90.4%$4.86M$2.88MN/A10
BTCT
BTC Digital
0.5349 of 5 stars
$0.49
-2.2%
N/A-83.3%$4.80M$14.04MN/A16
CSAI
Cloudastructure
3.0958 of 5 stars
$7.12
+24.5%
$45.00
+532.0%
-90.6%$4.76M$5.07MN/A20

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:MASK) was last updated on 8/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners