Free Trial

MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC) Competitors

MidCap Financial Investment logo
$11.72 -0.13 (-1.05%)
As of 03:02 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

MFIC vs. ARCC, GBDC, NMFC, SLRC, and BCSF

Should you be buying MidCap Financial Investment stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of MidCap Financial Investment include Ares Capital (ARCC), Golub Capital BDC (GBDC), New Mountain Finance (NMFC), SLR Investment (SLRC), and Bain Capital Specialty Finance (BCSF). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does MidCap Financial Investment compare to Ares Capital?

MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) and Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

Ares Capital has a net margin of 37.30% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 1.90%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 10.51% beat Ares Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MidCap Financial Investment1.90% 10.51% 4.22%
Ares Capital 37.30%9.85%4.59%

MidCap Financial Investment presently has a consensus target price of $11.54, indicating a potential downside of 1.61%. Ares Capital has a consensus target price of $20.75, indicating a potential upside of 9.30%. Given Ares Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ares Capital is more favorable than MidCap Financial Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22
Ares Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82

28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.4% of Ares Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ares Capital has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 4 more articles in the media than MidCap Financial Investment. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Ares Capital and 11 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment. Ares Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.56 indicating that Ares Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MidCap Financial Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ares Capital
6 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than MidCap Financial Investment. Ares Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MidCap Financial Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MidCap Financial Investment$320.88M3.01$63.17M$0.6617.77
Ares Capital$1.36B10.02$1.30B$1.6311.65

MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 187.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ares Capital pays out 117.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Ares Capital beats MidCap Financial Investment on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MidCap Financial Investment compare to Golub Capital BDC?

Golub Capital BDC (NASDAQ:GBDC) and MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Golub Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than MidCap Financial Investment. Golub Capital BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MidCap Financial Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Golub Capital BDC$870.78M3.94$376.65M$0.7717.08
MidCap Financial Investment$320.88M3.01$63.17M$0.6617.77

Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its share price is 59% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its share price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 24.64% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 1.90%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 10.51% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Golub Capital BDC24.64% 10.20% 4.47%
MidCap Financial Investment 1.90%10.51%4.22%

Golub Capital BDC currently has a consensus target price of $14.25, indicating a potential upside of 8.32%. MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus target price of $11.54, indicating a potential downside of 1.61%. Given Golub Capital BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Golub Capital BDC is more favorable than MidCap Financial Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Golub Capital BDC
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22

In the previous week, Golub Capital BDC had 9 more articles in the media than MidCap Financial Investment. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Golub Capital BDC and 11 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment. MidCap Financial Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Golub Capital BDC's score of 0.18 indicating that MidCap Financial Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Golub Capital BDC
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
MidCap Financial Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

42.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Golub Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. Golub Capital BDC pays out 171.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 187.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Golub Capital BDC beats MidCap Financial Investment on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MidCap Financial Investment compare to New Mountain Finance?

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) and MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and risk.

New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.1%. MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. New Mountain Finance pays out -172.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 187.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500.

New Mountain Finance currently has a consensus price target of $9.25, indicating a potential upside of 11.94%. MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $11.54, indicating a potential downside of 1.61%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than MidCap Financial Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
New Mountain Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.86
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22

MidCap Financial Investment has higher revenue and earnings than New Mountain Finance. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MidCap Financial Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
New Mountain Finance-$64.32M-12.13$16.49M-$0.58N/A
MidCap Financial Investment$320.88M3.01$63.17M$0.6617.77

32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 1.90% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -18.65%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 11.14% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
New Mountain Finance-18.65% 11.14% 4.63%
MidCap Financial Investment 1.90%10.51%4.22%

In the previous week, New Mountain Finance had 4 more articles in the media than MidCap Financial Investment. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for New Mountain Finance and 11 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment. MidCap Financial Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat New Mountain Finance's score of 0.36 indicating that MidCap Financial Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
New Mountain Finance
3 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
MidCap Financial Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

MidCap Financial Investment beats New Mountain Finance on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MidCap Financial Investment compare to SLR Investment?

MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) and SLR Investment (NASDAQ:SLRC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, risk and dividends.

MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. SLR Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.1%. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 187.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SLR Investment pays out 100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. SLR Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SLR Investment has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500.

MidCap Financial Investment currently has a consensus price target of $11.54, indicating a potential downside of 1.61%. SLR Investment has a consensus price target of $15.07, indicating a potential upside of 11.20%. Given SLR Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SLR Investment is more favorable than MidCap Financial Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22
SLR Investment
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

SLR Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than MidCap Financial Investment. SLR Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MidCap Financial Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MidCap Financial Investment$320.88M3.01$63.17M$0.6617.77
SLR Investment$218.54M3.38$92.54M$1.648.26

28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.3% of SLR Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.8% of SLR Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

SLR Investment has a net margin of 41.81% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 1.90%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 10.51% beat SLR Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MidCap Financial Investment1.90% 10.51% 4.22%
SLR Investment 41.81%8.33%3.25%

In the previous week, SLR Investment had 10 more articles in the media than MidCap Financial Investment. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for SLR Investment and 11 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment. MidCap Financial Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat SLR Investment's score of -0.27 indicating that MidCap Financial Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MidCap Financial Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
SLR Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

SLR Investment beats MidCap Financial Investment on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MidCap Financial Investment compare to Bain Capital Specialty Finance?

Bain Capital Specialty Finance (NYSE:BCSF) and MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance presently has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.68%. MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $11.54, indicating a potential downside of 1.61%. Given Bain Capital Specialty Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Bain Capital Specialty Finance is more favorable than MidCap Financial Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bain Capital Specialty Finance
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.3%. MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. Bain Capital Specialty Finance pays out 109.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 187.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Bain Capital Specialty Finance has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Bain Capital Specialty Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has a net margin of 36.14% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 1.90%. Bain Capital Specialty Finance's return on equity of 10.74% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bain Capital Specialty Finance36.14% 10.74% 4.51%
MidCap Financial Investment 1.90%10.51%4.22%

In the previous week, MidCap Financial Investment had 9 more articles in the media than Bain Capital Specialty Finance. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for MidCap Financial Investment and 2 mentions for Bain Capital Specialty Finance. MidCap Financial Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Bain Capital Specialty Finance's score of 0.32 indicating that MidCap Financial Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Bain Capital Specialty Finance
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
MidCap Financial Investment
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Bain Capital Specialty Finance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has higher earnings, but lower revenue than MidCap Financial Investment. Bain Capital Specialty Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MidCap Financial Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bain Capital Specialty Finance$114.51M7.72$98.76M$1.538.91
MidCap Financial Investment$320.88M3.01$63.17M$0.6617.77

Summary

Bain Capital Specialty Finance beats MidCap Financial Investment on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get MidCap Financial Investment News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MFIC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MFIC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MFIC vs. The Competition

MetricMidCap Financial InvestmentFIN IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$965.79M$7.10B$13.49B$12.26B
Dividend Yield10.27%5.57%5.75%5.24%
P/E Ratio293.2087.8623.1827.20
Price / Sales3.019.27180.6064.32
Price / Cash6.6672.9920.6653.97
Price / Book0.843.362.206.83
Net Income$63.17M$300.98M$1.11B$332.87M
7 Day PerformanceN/AN/AN/A0.16%
1 Month Performance0.30%7.44%2.87%7.17%
1 Year Performance-3.50%23.34%13.68%40.61%

MidCap Financial Investment Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
1.4189 of 5 stars
$11.73
-1.1%
$11.54
-1.6%
-1.1%$965.79M$320.88M293.20N/A
ARCC
Ares Capital
3.4195 of 5 stars
$19.23
+0.2%
$20.75
+7.9%
-8.8%$13.79B$1.36B11.782,550
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
2.6631 of 5 stars
$13.33
-2.6%
$14.50
+8.8%
-7.2%$3.50B$870.78M10.64N/A
NMFC
New Mountain Finance
4.0835 of 5 stars
$8.28
-3.2%
$9.25
+11.7%
-17.5%$815.17M$14.84M55.17N/A
SLRC
SLR Investment
3.9236 of 5 stars
$15.82
-0.8%
$15.29
-3.4%
-11.6%$862.27M$218.54M9.30N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:MFIC) was last updated on 5/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners