Ohio Valley Banc (OVBC) Competitors

Heritage Commerce has a net margin of 17.77% compared to Ohio Valley Banc's net margin of 14.31%. Ohio Valley Banc's return on equity of 8.37% beat Heritage Commerce's return on equity.

Heritage Commerce presently has a consensus target price of $13.13, suggesting a potential downside of 2.42%. Given Heritage Commerce's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Heritage Commerce is more favorable than Ohio Valley Banc.

75.6% of Heritage Commerce shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.1% of Ohio Valley Banc shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Heritage Commerce shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of Ohio Valley Banc shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Heritage Commerce has higher revenue and earnings than Ohio Valley Banc. Ohio Valley Banc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Heritage Commerce, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Ohio Valley Banc had 3 more articles in the media than Heritage Commerce. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Ohio Valley Banc and 0 mentions for Heritage Commerce. Ohio Valley Banc's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Heritage Commerce's score of 0.00 indicating that Ohio Valley Banc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Heritage Commerce pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Ohio Valley Banc pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Heritage Commerce pays out 66.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ohio Valley Banc pays out 33.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ohio Valley Banc has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Heritage Commerce has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ohio Valley Banc has a beta of 0.04, indicating that its share price is 96% less volatile than the broader market.

Orrstown Financial Services has a net margin of 24.00% compared to Ohio Valley Banc's net margin of 14.31%. Orrstown Financial Services' return on equity of 14.46% beat Ohio Valley Banc's return on equity.

22.1% of Ohio Valley Banc shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.3% of Orrstown Financial Services shares are held by institutional investors. 7.2% of Ohio Valley Banc shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Orrstown Financial Services shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ohio Valley Banc pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Orrstown Financial Services pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Ohio Valley Banc pays out 33.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Orrstown Financial Services pays out 27.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ohio Valley Banc has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Orrstown Financial Services has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Orrstown Financial Services is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Orrstown Financial Services has higher revenue and earnings than Ohio Valley Banc. Orrstown Financial Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ohio Valley Banc, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ohio Valley Banc has a beta of 0.04, meaning that its share price is 96% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Orrstown Financial Services has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Orrstown Financial Services had 1 more articles in the media than Ohio Valley Banc. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Orrstown Financial Services and 3 mentions for Ohio Valley Banc. Orrstown Financial Services' average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Ohio Valley Banc's score of 0.78 indicating that Orrstown Financial Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Orrstown Financial Services has a consensus target price of $44.33, suggesting a potential upside of 6.88%. Given Orrstown Financial Services' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Orrstown Financial Services is more favorable than Ohio Valley Banc.

51.3% of Alerus Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.1% of Ohio Valley Banc shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Alerus Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of Ohio Valley Banc shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Alerus Financial currently has a consensus target price of $35.50, indicating a potential upside of 10.73%. Given Alerus Financial's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Alerus Financial is more favorable than Ohio Valley Banc.

Alerus Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Ohio Valley Banc. Ohio Valley Banc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alerus Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Ohio Valley Banc had 1 more articles in the media than Alerus Financial. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Ohio Valley Banc and 2 mentions for Alerus Financial. Ohio Valley Banc's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Alerus Financial's score of 0.60 indicating that Ohio Valley Banc is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Ohio Valley Banc has a net margin of 14.31% compared to Alerus Financial's net margin of 6.87%. Alerus Financial's return on equity of 14.41% beat Ohio Valley Banc's return on equity.

Alerus Financial has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ohio Valley Banc has a beta of 0.04, suggesting that its stock price is 96% less volatile than the broader market.

Alerus Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Ohio Valley Banc pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Alerus Financial pays out 83.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ohio Valley Banc pays out 33.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Alerus Financial has increased its dividend for 25 consecutive years and Ohio Valley Banc has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Alerus Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Ohio Valley Banc. Ohio Valley Banc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ohio Valley Banc pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Ohio Valley Banc pays out 33.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ohio Valley Banc has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Ohio Valley Banc is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Peapack-Gladstone Financial had 6 more articles in the media than Ohio Valley Banc. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial and 3 mentions for Ohio Valley Banc. Ohio Valley Banc's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's score of 0.40 indicating that Ohio Valley Banc is being referred to more favorably in the media.

22.1% of Ohio Valley Banc shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 7.2% of Ohio Valley Banc shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ohio Valley Banc has a beta of 0.04, suggesting that its share price is 96% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Ohio Valley Banc has a net margin of 14.31% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 11.09%. Ohio Valley Banc's return on equity of 8.37% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus target price of $56.33, suggesting a potential upside of 27.68%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than Ohio Valley Banc.