Go Pro

Redhill Biopharma (RDHL) Competitors

Redhill Biopharma logo
$0.81 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 07/2/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$0.86 +0.04 (+5.27%)
As of 07/2/2026 07:26 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

RDHL vs. TPST, CELU, ATOS, ZIVO, and MAAQ

Should you buy Redhill Biopharma stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Redhill Biopharma with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Redhill Biopharma include Tempest Therapeutics (TPST), Celularity (CELU), Atossa Genetics (ATOS), ZIVO Bioscience (ZIVO), and Mana Capital Acquisition (MAAQ). These companies are all part of the "pharmaceutical products" industry.

How does Redhill Biopharma compare to Tempest Therapeutics?

Tempest Therapeutics (NASDAQ:TPST) and Redhill Biopharma (NASDAQ:RDHL) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends and media sentiment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tempest Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Redhill Biopharma
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Tempest Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Redhill Biopharma'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tempest Therapeutics Neutral
Redhill Biopharma Neutral

22.5% of Tempest Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.2% of Redhill Biopharma shares are owned by institutional investors. 36.3% of Tempest Therapeutics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.8% of Redhill Biopharma shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tempest Therapeutics has a beta of -1.73, meaning that its stock price is 273% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Redhill Biopharma has a beta of 4.98, meaning that its stock price is 398% more volatile than the broader market.

Redhill Biopharma has higher revenue and earnings than Tempest Therapeutics. Tempest Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redhill Biopharma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tempest TherapeuticsN/AN/A-$26.26M-$6.01N/A
Redhill Biopharma$290K14.54-$430K$1.05 thousand0.00

Redhill Biopharma's return on equity of 0.00% beat Tempest Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tempest TherapeuticsN/A -355.61% -121.21%
Redhill Biopharma N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Redhill Biopharma beats Tempest Therapeutics on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redhill Biopharma compare to Celularity?

Celularity (NASDAQ:CELU) and Redhill Biopharma (NASDAQ:RDHL) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and profitability.

In the previous week, Celularity's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Redhill Biopharma'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Celularity Neutral
Redhill Biopharma Neutral

19.0% of Celularity shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.2% of Redhill Biopharma shares are held by institutional investors. 17.3% of Celularity shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.8% of Redhill Biopharma shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Redhill Biopharma has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Celularity. Celularity is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redhill Biopharma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celularity$26.55M0.68-$91.72M-$3.33N/A
Redhill Biopharma$290K14.54-$430K$1.05 thousand0.00

Celularity has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Redhill Biopharma has a beta of 4.98, meaning that its stock price is 398% more volatile than the broader market.

Celularity presently has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 868.21%. Given Celularity's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Celularity is more favorable than Redhill Biopharma.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celularity
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Redhill Biopharma
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Redhill Biopharma has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Celularity's net margin of -345.45%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celularity-345.45% N/A -77.94%
Redhill Biopharma N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Redhill Biopharma beats Celularity on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redhill Biopharma compare to Atossa Genetics?

Atossa Genetics (NASDAQ:ATOS) and Redhill Biopharma (NASDAQ:RDHL) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment and dividends.

Redhill Biopharma has higher revenue and earnings than Atossa Genetics. Atossa Genetics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redhill Biopharma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Atossa GeneticsN/AN/A-$34.77M-$3.21N/A
Redhill Biopharma$290K14.54-$430K$1.05 thousand0.00

Redhill Biopharma's return on equity of 0.00% beat Atossa Genetics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Atossa GeneticsN/A -84.91% -72.36%
Redhill Biopharma N/A N/A N/A

Atossa Genetics has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Redhill Biopharma has a beta of 4.98, meaning that its stock price is 398% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Atossa Genetics had 1 more articles in the media than Redhill Biopharma. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Atossa Genetics and 0 mentions for Redhill Biopharma. Atossa Genetics' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Redhill Biopharma's score of 0.00 indicating that Atossa Genetics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Atossa Genetics Positive
Redhill Biopharma Neutral

Atossa Genetics currently has a consensus target price of $24.50, suggesting a potential upside of 1,055.66%. Given Atossa Genetics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Atossa Genetics is more favorable than Redhill Biopharma.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Atossa Genetics
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Redhill Biopharma
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

12.7% of Atossa Genetics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.2% of Redhill Biopharma shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.8% of Atossa Genetics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.8% of Redhill Biopharma shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Atossa Genetics and Redhill Biopharma tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redhill Biopharma compare to ZIVO Bioscience?

Redhill Biopharma (NASDAQ:RDHL) and ZIVO Bioscience (NASDAQ:ZIVO) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and dividends.

7.2% of Redhill Biopharma shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.8% of ZIVO Bioscience shares are held by institutional investors. 6.8% of Redhill Biopharma shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 48.9% of ZIVO Bioscience shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Redhill BiopharmaN/A N/A N/A
ZIVO Bioscience N/A N/A -2,240.92%

Redhill Biopharma has a beta of 4.98, meaning that its share price is 398% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ZIVO Bioscience has a beta of 0.1, meaning that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, ZIVO Bioscience had 1 more articles in the media than Redhill Biopharma. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for ZIVO Bioscience and 0 mentions for Redhill Biopharma. Redhill Biopharma's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled ZIVO Bioscience'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Redhill Biopharma Neutral
ZIVO Bioscience Neutral

Redhill Biopharma has higher revenue and earnings than ZIVO Bioscience. ZIVO Bioscience is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Redhill Biopharma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Redhill Biopharma$290K14.54-$430K$1.05 thousand0.00
ZIVO Bioscience$15.85K1,309.78-$7.78M-$1.71N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Redhill Biopharma
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
ZIVO Bioscience
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Redhill Biopharma beats ZIVO Bioscience on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Redhill Biopharma compare to Mana Capital Acquisition?

Redhill Biopharma (NASDAQ:RDHL) and Mana Capital Acquisition (NASDAQ:MAAQ) are both small-cap pharmaceutical products companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Mana Capital Acquisition has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Redhill Biopharma.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Redhill Biopharma$290K14.54-$430K$1.05 thousand0.00
Mana Capital AcquisitionN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Redhill BiopharmaN/A N/A N/A
Mana Capital Acquisition N/A N/A N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Redhill Biopharma
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Mana Capital Acquisition
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Redhill Biopharma's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mana Capital Acquisition'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Redhill Biopharma Neutral
Mana Capital Acquisition Neutral

7.2% of Redhill Biopharma shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.4% of Mana Capital Acquisition shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.8% of Redhill Biopharma shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Redhill Biopharma beats Mana Capital Acquisition on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Redhill Biopharma News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for RDHL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding RDHL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

RDHL vs. The Competition

MetricRedhill BiopharmaMED IndustryMedical SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$4.22M$3.10B$7.16B$12.48B
Dividend YieldN/A2.05%2.66%6.52%
P/E Ratio0.0020.0628.0224.70
Price / Sales14.54360.33540.3799.49
Price / CashN/A57.4949.2657.09
Price / Book0.984.3210.966.46
Net Income-$430K$64.45M$3.57B$337.01M
7 Day Performance-7.56%2.97%2.12%1.69%
1 Month Performance-21.15%6.83%5.25%3.81%
1 Year Performance-59.69%29.07%33.29%23.90%

Redhill Biopharma Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
RDHL
Redhill Biopharma
1.3312 of 5 stars
$0.81
flat
N/A-59.7%$4.22M$290K0.00210
TPST
Tempest Therapeutics
1.24 of 5 stars
$1.11
+0.9%
N/A-84.7%$17.58MN/AN/A20
CELU
Celularity
1.4098 of 5 stars
$0.60
-1.4%
$6.00
+903.5%
-69.8%$17.55M$26.55MN/A220
ATOS
Atossa Genetics
2.8581 of 5 stars
$1.93
-2.5%
$24.50
+1,169.4%
-82.9%$17.05MN/AN/A8
ZIVO
ZIVO Bioscience
N/A$4.03
-4.3%
N/A-58.3%$16.73M$15.85KN/A10

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:RDHL) was last updated on 7/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners