Go Pro

Q32 Bio (QTTB) Competitors

Q32 Bio logo
$15.60 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 08/7/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$15.75 +0.15 (+0.96%)
As of 04:02 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

QTTB vs. CGEM, FBRX, JBIO, CVAC, and OLMA

Should you buy Q32 Bio stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Q32 Bio with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Q32 Bio include Cullinan Therapeutics (CGEM), Forte Biosciences (FBRX), Jade Biosciences (JBIO), CureVac (CVAC), and Olema Pharmaceuticals (OLMA). These companies are all part of the "biotechnology" industry.

How does Q32 Bio compare to Cullinan Therapeutics?

Cullinan Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CGEM) and Q32 Bio (NASDAQ:QTTB) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Cullinan Therapeutics has a beta of 0.01, meaning that its share price is 99% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Q32 Bio has a beta of 0.23, meaning that its share price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

Q32 Bio's return on equity of 50.17% beat Cullinan Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cullinan TherapeuticsN/A -52.89% -48.18%
Q32 Bio N/A 50.17%29.49%

86.3% of Cullinan Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.3% of Q32 Bio shares are held by institutional investors. 8.6% of Cullinan Therapeutics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.5% of Q32 Bio shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Q32 Bio has higher revenue and earnings than Cullinan Therapeutics. Cullinan Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q32 Bio, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cullinan TherapeuticsN/AN/A-$219.88M-$3.10N/A
Q32 Bio$53.74M4.92$29.82M$3.005.20

In the previous week, Q32 Bio had 4 more articles in the media than Cullinan Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Q32 Bio and 6 mentions for Cullinan Therapeutics. Q32 Bio's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Cullinan Therapeutics' score of 0.16 indicating that Q32 Bio is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cullinan Therapeutics
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Q32 Bio
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Cullinan Therapeutics currently has a consensus price target of $32.14, indicating a potential upside of 81.29%. Q32 Bio has a consensus price target of $30.00, indicating a potential upside of 92.31%. Given Q32 Bio's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Q32 Bio is more favorable than Cullinan Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cullinan Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Q32 Bio
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Summary

Q32 Bio beats Cullinan Therapeutics on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q32 Bio compare to Forte Biosciences?

Forte Biosciences (NASDAQ:FBRX) and Q32 Bio (NASDAQ:QTTB) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

In the previous week, Q32 Bio had 3 more articles in the media than Forte Biosciences. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Q32 Bio and 7 mentions for Forte Biosciences. Q32 Bio's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Forte Biosciences' score of 0.64 indicating that Q32 Bio is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Forte Biosciences
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Q32 Bio
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Q32 Bio has higher revenue and earnings than Forte Biosciences. Forte Biosciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q32 Bio, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Forte BiosciencesN/AN/A-$69.38M-$4.64N/A
Q32 Bio$53.74M4.92$29.82M$3.005.20

Q32 Bio's return on equity of 50.17% beat Forte Biosciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Forte BiosciencesN/A -106.17% -85.50%
Q32 Bio N/A 50.17%29.49%

77.6% of Forte Biosciences shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.3% of Q32 Bio shares are held by institutional investors. 4.4% of Forte Biosciences shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.5% of Q32 Bio shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Forte Biosciences has a beta of 2.6, meaning that its stock price is 160% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Q32 Bio has a beta of 0.23, meaning that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

Forte Biosciences currently has a consensus price target of $72.50, indicating a potential downside of 5.59%. Q32 Bio has a consensus price target of $30.00, indicating a potential upside of 92.31%. Given Q32 Bio's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Q32 Bio is more favorable than Forte Biosciences.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Forte Biosciences
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14
Q32 Bio
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Summary

Q32 Bio beats Forte Biosciences on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q32 Bio compare to Jade Biosciences?

Jade Biosciences (NASDAQ:JBIO) and Q32 Bio (NASDAQ:QTTB) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation and earnings.

31.3% of Q32 Bio shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.1% of Jade Biosciences shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.5% of Q32 Bio shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Q32 Bio has higher revenue and earnings than Jade Biosciences. Jade Biosciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q32 Bio, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jade BiosciencesN/AN/A-$127.41M-$2.02N/A
Q32 Bio$53.74M4.92$29.82M$3.005.20

In the previous week, Q32 Bio had 6 more articles in the media than Jade Biosciences. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Q32 Bio and 4 mentions for Jade Biosciences. Q32 Bio's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Jade Biosciences' score of 0.89 indicating that Q32 Bio is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Jade Biosciences
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Q32 Bio
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Jade Biosciences has a beta of 1.49, suggesting that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Q32 Bio has a beta of 0.23, suggesting that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

Jade Biosciences currently has a consensus price target of $51.57, suggesting a potential upside of 134.84%. Q32 Bio has a consensus price target of $30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 92.31%. Given Jade Biosciences' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Jade Biosciences is more favorable than Q32 Bio.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Jade Biosciences
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.90
Q32 Bio
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Q32 Bio's return on equity of 50.17% beat Jade Biosciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jade BiosciencesN/A -51.34% -47.32%
Q32 Bio N/A 50.17%29.49%

Summary

Q32 Bio beats Jade Biosciences on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q32 Bio compare to CureVac?

Q32 Bio (NASDAQ:QTTB) and CureVac (NASDAQ:CVAC) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and media sentiment.

Q32 Bio currently has a consensus target price of $30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 92.31%. Given Q32 Bio's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Q32 Bio is more favorable than CureVac.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Q32 Bio
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
CureVac
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Q32 Bio had 10 more articles in the media than CureVac. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Q32 Bio and 0 mentions for CureVac. Q32 Bio's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat CureVac's score of 0.00 indicating that Q32 Bio is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Q32 Bio Positive
CureVac Neutral

CureVac has a net margin of 199.92% compared to Q32 Bio's net margin of 0.00%. Q32 Bio's return on equity of 50.17% beat CureVac's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Q32 BioN/A 50.17% 29.49%
CureVac 199.92%-23.03%-19.09%

Q32 Bio has a beta of 0.23, indicating that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CureVac has a beta of 1.77, indicating that its stock price is 77% more volatile than the broader market.

CureVac has higher revenue and earnings than Q32 Bio. Q32 Bio is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CureVac, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Q32 Bio$53.74M4.92$29.82M$3.005.20
CureVac$70.74M14.78$175.50M$0.726.47

31.3% of Q32 Bio shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of CureVac shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.5% of Q32 Bio shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of CureVac shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Q32 Bio beats CureVac on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q32 Bio compare to Olema Pharmaceuticals?

Q32 Bio (NASDAQ:QTTB) and Olema Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:OLMA) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Q32 Bio has a beta of 0.23, suggesting that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Olema Pharmaceuticals has a beta of 2.03, suggesting that its stock price is 103% more volatile than the broader market.

Q32 Bio's return on equity of 50.17% beat Olema Pharmaceuticals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Q32 BioN/A 50.17% 29.49%
Olema Pharmaceuticals N/A -46.00%-41.22%

Q32 Bio has higher revenue and earnings than Olema Pharmaceuticals. Olema Pharmaceuticals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q32 Bio, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Q32 Bio$53.74M4.92$29.82M$3.005.20
Olema PharmaceuticalsN/AN/A-$162.45M-$2.02N/A

Q32 Bio presently has a consensus target price of $30.00, indicating a potential upside of 92.31%. Olema Pharmaceuticals has a consensus target price of $44.10, indicating a potential upside of 265.98%. Given Olema Pharmaceuticals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Olema Pharmaceuticals is more favorable than Q32 Bio.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Q32 Bio
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Olema Pharmaceuticals
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

31.3% of Q32 Bio shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.8% of Olema Pharmaceuticals shares are held by institutional investors. 34.5% of Q32 Bio shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.6% of Olema Pharmaceuticals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Q32 Bio had 5 more articles in the media than Olema Pharmaceuticals. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Q32 Bio and 5 mentions for Olema Pharmaceuticals. Q32 Bio's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Olema Pharmaceuticals' score of 0.58 indicating that Q32 Bio is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Q32 Bio
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Olema Pharmaceuticals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Q32 Bio beats Olema Pharmaceuticals on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Q32 Bio News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for QTTB and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QTTB and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

QTTB vs. The Competition

MetricQ32 BioBiotechnology IndustryHealthcare SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$264.58M$3.69B$7.00B$12.99B
Dividend YieldN/A3.76%2.58%10.20%
P/E Ratio5.209.02270.5925.05
Price / Sales4.921,286.07598.0184.12
Price / Cash10.2944.9528.8937.44
Price / Book4.5718.0211.386.43
Net Income$29.82M-$13.25M$3.45B$348.10M
7 Day Performance2.90%5.02%3.46%2.68%
1 Month Performance39.16%-2.10%-0.66%-0.83%
1 Year Performance857.06%61.36%77.38%23.97%

Q32 Bio Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
QTTB
Q32 Bio
4.6832 of 5 stars
$15.60
flat
$30.00
+92.3%
+857.1%$264.58M$53.74M5.2039
CGEM
Cullinan Therapeutics
2.6779 of 5 stars
$17.55
+8.0%
$32.14
+83.2%
+142.9%$1.08BN/AN/A30
FBRX
Forte Biosciences
1.387 of 5 stars
$76.56
-0.1%
$72.50
-5.3%
+654.3%$1.06BN/AN/A5
JBIO
Jade Biosciences
3.2251 of 5 stars
$21.35
+11.5%
$51.57
+141.6%
+193.2%$1.05BN/AN/A20
CVAC
CureVac
N/A$4.66
flat
N/AN/A$1.05B$70.74M6.47880

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:QTTB) was last updated on 8/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners