Free Trial
Your Portfolio Deserves Better! MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
Upgrade Now
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Q32 Bio (QTTB) Competitors

Q32 Bio logo
$6.07 +0.32 (+5.57%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$5.82 -0.25 (-4.04%)
As of 04:33 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

QTTB vs. OVID, IRD, SNDL, PBYI, and SRZN

Should you buy Q32 Bio stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Q32 Bio with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Q32 Bio include Ovid Therapeutics (OVID), Opus Genetics (IRD), SNDL (SNDL), Puma Biotechnology (PBYI), and Surrozen (SRZN). These companies are all part of the "pharmaceutical products" industry.

How does Q32 Bio compare to Ovid Therapeutics?

Q32 Bio (NASDAQ:QTTB) and Ovid Therapeutics (NASDAQ:OVID) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and risk.

Q32 Bio has a beta of -0.05, meaning that its share price is 105% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ovid Therapeutics has a beta of 0.18, meaning that its share price is 82% less volatile than the broader market.

31.3% of Q32 Bio shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.2% of Ovid Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.0% of Q32 Bio shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Ovid Therapeutics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ovid Therapeutics had 6 more articles in the media than Q32 Bio. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Ovid Therapeutics and 1 mentions for Q32 Bio. Q32 Bio's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Ovid Therapeutics' score of -0.33 indicating that Q32 Bio is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Q32 Bio
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ovid Therapeutics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Q32 Bio presently has a consensus price target of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 114.17%. Ovid Therapeutics has a consensus price target of $5.13, suggesting a potential upside of 113.54%. Given Q32 Bio's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Q32 Bio is more favorable than Ovid Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Q32 Bio
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ovid Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.89

Q32 Bio has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ovid Therapeutics' net margin of -240.11%. Q32 Bio's return on equity of 149.23% beat Ovid Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Q32 BioN/A 149.23% 34.50%
Ovid Therapeutics -240.11%-22.51%-18.67%

Q32 Bio has higher revenue and earnings than Ovid Therapeutics. Ovid Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q32 Bio, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Q32 Bio$53.74M1.92$29.82M$2.662.28
Ovid Therapeutics$7.25M43.66-$17.41M-$0.29N/A

Summary

Q32 Bio beats Ovid Therapeutics on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q32 Bio compare to Opus Genetics?

Opus Genetics (NASDAQ:IRD) and Q32 Bio (NASDAQ:QTTB) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Opus Genetics had 24 more articles in the media than Q32 Bio. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Opus Genetics and 1 mentions for Q32 Bio. Q32 Bio's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Opus Genetics' score of -0.35 indicating that Q32 Bio is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Opus Genetics
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Q32 Bio
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

15.0% of Opus Genetics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.3% of Q32 Bio shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.7% of Opus Genetics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 40.0% of Q32 Bio shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Q32 Bio has higher revenue and earnings than Opus Genetics. Opus Genetics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q32 Bio, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Opus Genetics$14.20M24.44-$49.59M-$1.33N/A
Q32 Bio$53.74M1.92$29.82M$2.662.28

Q32 Bio has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Opus Genetics' net margin of -892.36%. Q32 Bio's return on equity of 149.23% beat Opus Genetics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Opus Genetics-892.36% -338.88% -191.21%
Q32 Bio N/A 149.23%34.50%

Opus Genetics has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Q32 Bio has a beta of -0.05, meaning that its stock price is 105% less volatile than the broader market.

Opus Genetics presently has a consensus target price of $10.20, indicating a potential upside of 139.27%. Q32 Bio has a consensus target price of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 114.17%. Given Opus Genetics' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Opus Genetics is more favorable than Q32 Bio.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Opus Genetics
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.79
Q32 Bio
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Q32 Bio beats Opus Genetics on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q32 Bio compare to SNDL?

SNDL (NASDAQ:SNDL) and Q32 Bio (NASDAQ:QTTB) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

SNDL currently has a consensus target price of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 262.32%. Q32 Bio has a consensus target price of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 114.17%. Given SNDL's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe SNDL is more favorable than Q32 Bio.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
SNDL
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Q32 Bio
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

31.3% of Q32 Bio shares are held by institutional investors. 40.0% of Q32 Bio shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Q32 Bio had 1 more articles in the media than SNDL. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Q32 Bio and 0 mentions for SNDL. Q32 Bio's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat SNDL's score of 0.00 indicating that Q32 Bio is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
SNDL Neutral
Q32 Bio Positive

SNDL has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Q32 Bio has a beta of -0.05, indicating that its share price is 105% less volatile than the broader market.

Q32 Bio has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SNDL. SNDL is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q32 Bio, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SNDL$677.32M0.52-$11.29M-$0.03N/A
Q32 Bio$53.74M1.92$29.82M$2.662.28

Q32 Bio has a net margin of 0.00% compared to SNDL's net margin of -1.19%. Q32 Bio's return on equity of 149.23% beat SNDL's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SNDL-1.19% -1.02% -0.85%
Q32 Bio N/A 149.23%34.50%

Summary

Q32 Bio beats SNDL on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q32 Bio compare to Puma Biotechnology?

Puma Biotechnology (NASDAQ:PBYI) and Q32 Bio (NASDAQ:QTTB) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, risk, media sentiment and earnings.

Puma Biotechnology has higher revenue and earnings than Q32 Bio. Q32 Bio is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Puma Biotechnology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Puma Biotechnology$228.40M1.52$31.11M$0.4814.19
Q32 Bio$53.74M1.92$29.82M$2.662.28

Puma Biotechnology has a net margin of 10.69% compared to Q32 Bio's net margin of 0.00%. Q32 Bio's return on equity of 149.23% beat Puma Biotechnology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Puma Biotechnology10.69% 20.30% 12.05%
Q32 Bio N/A 149.23%34.50%

Q32 Bio has a consensus price target of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 114.17%. Given Q32 Bio's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Q32 Bio is more favorable than Puma Biotechnology.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Puma Biotechnology
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Q32 Bio
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

61.3% of Puma Biotechnology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.3% of Q32 Bio shares are held by institutional investors. 22.2% of Puma Biotechnology shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.0% of Q32 Bio shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Puma Biotechnology has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Q32 Bio has a beta of -0.05, meaning that its share price is 105% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Puma Biotechnology had 1 more articles in the media than Q32 Bio. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Puma Biotechnology and 1 mentions for Q32 Bio. Q32 Bio's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Puma Biotechnology's score of 0.33 indicating that Q32 Bio is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Puma Biotechnology
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Q32 Bio
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Q32 Bio beats Puma Biotechnology on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Q32 Bio compare to Surrozen?

Surrozen (NASDAQ:SRZN) and Q32 Bio (NASDAQ:QTTB) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends and earnings.

66.6% of Surrozen shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.3% of Q32 Bio shares are held by institutional investors. 31.7% of Surrozen shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.0% of Q32 Bio shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Surrozen had 3 more articles in the media than Q32 Bio. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Surrozen and 1 mentions for Q32 Bio. Q32 Bio's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Surrozen's score of 0.20 indicating that Q32 Bio is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Surrozen
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Q32 Bio
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Surrozen currently has a consensus price target of $42.00, suggesting a potential upside of 64.25%. Q32 Bio has a consensus price target of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 114.17%. Given Q32 Bio's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Q32 Bio is more favorable than Surrozen.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Surrozen
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Q32 Bio
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Q32 Bio has higher revenue and earnings than Surrozen. Surrozen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Q32 Bio, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Surrozen$7.49M39.61-$242.03M-$37.59N/A
Q32 Bio$53.74M1.92$29.82M$2.662.28

Q32 Bio has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Surrozen's net margin of -4,810.50%. Q32 Bio's return on equity of 149.23% beat Surrozen's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Surrozen-4,810.50% -4,055.04% -154.08%
Q32 Bio N/A 149.23%34.50%

Surrozen has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Q32 Bio has a beta of -0.05, suggesting that its stock price is 105% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Q32 Bio beats Surrozen on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Q32 Bio News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for QTTB and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QTTB and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

QTTB vs. The Competition

MetricQ32 BioMED IndustryMedical SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$102.95M$3.26B$6.26B$12.10B
Dividend YieldN/A2.33%2.80%5.32%
P/E Ratio2.2818.7020.6125.11
Price / Sales1.92279.28577.3991.11
Price / Cash4.1655.2727.4837.30
Price / Book1.786.579.686.62
Net Income$29.82M$24.30M$3.55B$335.60M
7 Day Performance4.48%-3.60%-2.06%-1.97%
1 Month Performance3.76%-7.89%-3.88%-1.83%
1 Year Performance248.85%51.82%29.45%27.43%

Q32 Bio Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
QTTB
Q32 Bio
4.042 of 5 stars
$6.07
+5.6%
$13.00
+114.2%
+224.9%$102.95M$53.74M2.2839
OVID
Ovid Therapeutics
2.5213 of 5 stars
$2.87
+2.9%
$4.63
+61.1%
+695.4%$378.50M$7.25MN/A60
IRD
Opus Genetics
3.1202 of 5 stars
$5.18
+1.2%
$10.30
+98.8%
+335.3%$369.85M$14.20MN/A14
SNDL
SNDL
2.8076 of 5 stars
$1.41
-1.4%
$5.00
+254.6%
+3.0%$362.93M$677.32MN/A2,751
PBYI
Puma Biotechnology
1.3527 of 5 stars
$7.08
-0.8%
N/A+100.9%$360.37M$228.40M14.75200

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:QTTB) was last updated on 5/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners