Free Trial

Tandem Diabetes Care (TNDM) Competitors

Tandem Diabetes Care logo
$16.74 -0.02 (-0.11%)
As of 03:21 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

TNDM vs. MMED, LIVN, NVST, IRTC, and WRBY

Should you buy Tandem Diabetes Care stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Tandem Diabetes Care with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Tandem Diabetes Care include MiniMed Group (MMED), LivaNova (LIVN), Envista (NVST), iRhythm Technologies (IRTC), and Warby Parker (WRBY). These companies are all part of the "medical equipment" industry.

How does Tandem Diabetes Care compare to MiniMed Group?

MiniMed Group (NASDAQ:MMED) and Tandem Diabetes Care (NASDAQ:TNDM) are both medical equipment companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

19.7% of MiniMed Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of MiniMed Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Tandem Diabetes Care shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, MiniMed Group had 1 more articles in the media than Tandem Diabetes Care. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for MiniMed Group and 3 mentions for Tandem Diabetes Care. Tandem Diabetes Care's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat MiniMed Group's score of 0.47 indicating that Tandem Diabetes Care is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MiniMed Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Tandem Diabetes Care
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

MiniMed Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tandem Diabetes Care's net margin of -9.20%. MiniMed Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Tandem Diabetes Care's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MiniMed GroupN/A N/A N/A
Tandem Diabetes Care -9.20%-53.88%-7.88%

MiniMed Group has higher revenue and earnings than Tandem Diabetes Care.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MiniMed Group$2.99B1.39N/AN/AN/A
Tandem Diabetes Care$1.01B1.13-$204.71M-$1.40N/A

MiniMed Group currently has a consensus price target of $21.33, indicating a potential upside of 43.71%. Tandem Diabetes Care has a consensus price target of $29.84, indicating a potential upside of 78.25%. Given Tandem Diabetes Care's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Tandem Diabetes Care is more favorable than MiniMed Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MiniMed Group
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Tandem Diabetes Care
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.48

Summary

MiniMed Group beats Tandem Diabetes Care on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tandem Diabetes Care compare to LivaNova?

Tandem Diabetes Care (NASDAQ:TNDM) and LivaNova (NASDAQ:LIVN) are both medical companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

97.6% of LivaNova shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Tandem Diabetes Care shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of LivaNova shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tandem Diabetes Care has higher earnings, but lower revenue than LivaNova. Tandem Diabetes Care is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LivaNova, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tandem Diabetes Care$1.01B1.13-$204.71M-$1.40N/A
LivaNova$1.39B3.14-$242.47M$1.9540.72

Tandem Diabetes Care has a beta of 1.58, suggesting that its share price is 58% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LivaNova has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

LivaNova has a net margin of 7.48% compared to Tandem Diabetes Care's net margin of -9.20%. LivaNova's return on equity of 16.48% beat Tandem Diabetes Care's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tandem Diabetes Care-9.20% -53.88% -7.88%
LivaNova 7.48%16.48%7.59%

Tandem Diabetes Care presently has a consensus price target of $29.84, suggesting a potential upside of 78.25%. LivaNova has a consensus price target of $79.38, suggesting a potential downside of 0.04%. Given Tandem Diabetes Care's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Tandem Diabetes Care is more favorable than LivaNova.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tandem Diabetes Care
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.48
LivaNova
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, LivaNova had 3 more articles in the media than Tandem Diabetes Care. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for LivaNova and 3 mentions for Tandem Diabetes Care. LivaNova's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Tandem Diabetes Care's score of 0.76 indicating that LivaNova is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tandem Diabetes Care
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
LivaNova
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

LivaNova beats Tandem Diabetes Care on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tandem Diabetes Care compare to Envista?

Tandem Diabetes Care (NASDAQ:TNDM) and Envista (NYSE:NVST) are both medical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Tandem Diabetes Care had 3 more articles in the media than Envista. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Tandem Diabetes Care and 0 mentions for Envista. Tandem Diabetes Care's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Envista's score of 0.50 indicating that Tandem Diabetes Care is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tandem Diabetes Care Positive
Envista Positive

Envista has higher revenue and earnings than Tandem Diabetes Care. Tandem Diabetes Care is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Envista, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tandem Diabetes Care$1.01B1.13-$204.71M-$1.40N/A
Envista$2.72B1.49$47M$0.4160.67

Tandem Diabetes Care has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Envista has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Envista has a net margin of 2.41% compared to Tandem Diabetes Care's net margin of -9.20%. Envista's return on equity of 7.11% beat Tandem Diabetes Care's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tandem Diabetes Care-9.20% -53.88% -7.88%
Envista 2.41%7.11%3.91%

Tandem Diabetes Care presently has a consensus price target of $29.84, suggesting a potential upside of 78.25%. Envista has a consensus price target of $28.67, suggesting a potential upside of 15.24%. Given Tandem Diabetes Care's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Tandem Diabetes Care is more favorable than Envista.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tandem Diabetes Care
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.48
Envista
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Summary

Envista beats Tandem Diabetes Care on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tandem Diabetes Care compare to iRhythm Technologies?

iRhythm Technologies (NASDAQ:IRTC) and Tandem Diabetes Care (NASDAQ:TNDM) are both medical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

iRhythm Technologies has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tandem Diabetes Care has a beta of 1.58, indicating that its share price is 58% more volatile than the broader market.

iRhythm Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $187.38, indicating a potential upside of 71.29%. Tandem Diabetes Care has a consensus target price of $29.84, indicating a potential upside of 78.25%. Given Tandem Diabetes Care's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Tandem Diabetes Care is more favorable than iRhythm Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
iRhythm Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.94
Tandem Diabetes Care
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.48

iRhythm Technologies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tandem Diabetes Care. iRhythm Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tandem Diabetes Care, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
iRhythm Technologies$747.14M4.81-$44.55M-$0.86N/A
Tandem Diabetes Care$1.01B1.13-$204.71M-$1.40N/A

iRhythm Technologies has a net margin of -3.53% compared to Tandem Diabetes Care's net margin of -9.20%. iRhythm Technologies' return on equity of -10.26% beat Tandem Diabetes Care's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
iRhythm Technologies-3.53% -10.26% -1.39%
Tandem Diabetes Care -9.20%-53.88%-7.88%

In the previous week, iRhythm Technologies had 5 more articles in the media than Tandem Diabetes Care. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for iRhythm Technologies and 3 mentions for Tandem Diabetes Care. iRhythm Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Tandem Diabetes Care's score of 0.76 indicating that iRhythm Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
iRhythm Technologies
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Tandem Diabetes Care
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

iRhythm Technologies beats Tandem Diabetes Care on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Tandem Diabetes Care compare to Warby Parker?

Tandem Diabetes Care (NASDAQ:TNDM) and Warby Parker (NYSE:WRBY) are both medical equipment companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and earnings.

93.2% of Warby Parker shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Tandem Diabetes Care shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.8% of Warby Parker shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Warby Parker had 4 more articles in the media than Tandem Diabetes Care. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Warby Parker and 3 mentions for Tandem Diabetes Care. Tandem Diabetes Care's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Warby Parker's score of 0.33 indicating that Tandem Diabetes Care is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tandem Diabetes Care
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Warby Parker
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Warby Parker has a net margin of 0.15% compared to Tandem Diabetes Care's net margin of -9.20%. Warby Parker's return on equity of 2.30% beat Tandem Diabetes Care's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tandem Diabetes Care-9.20% -53.88% -7.88%
Warby Parker 0.15%2.30%1.18%

Warby Parker has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tandem Diabetes Care. Tandem Diabetes Care is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warby Parker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tandem Diabetes Care$1.01B1.13-$204.71M-$1.40N/A
Warby Parker$871.91M3.09$1.64M$0.021,259.20

Tandem Diabetes Care presently has a consensus target price of $29.84, indicating a potential upside of 78.25%. Warby Parker has a consensus target price of $29.50, indicating a potential upside of 17.14%. Given Tandem Diabetes Care's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Tandem Diabetes Care is more favorable than Warby Parker.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tandem Diabetes Care
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.48
Warby Parker
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.64

Tandem Diabetes Care has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its share price is 58% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Warby Parker has a beta of 1.96, meaning that its share price is 96% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Warby Parker beats Tandem Diabetes Care on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Tandem Diabetes Care News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TNDM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TNDM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TNDM vs. The Competition

MetricTandem Diabetes CareMED INSTRUMENTS IndustryMedical SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.15B$7.05B$6.46B$12.25B
Dividend YieldN/A1.21%2.66%5.66%
P/E Ratio-11.9548.1323.9624.45
Price / Sales1.1373.04519.37138.35
Price / CashN/A25.5927.4837.92
Price / Book7.316.8810.586.77
Net Income-$204.71M$159.20M$3.56B$337.21M
7 Day Performance-4.93%-2.42%0.43%2.12%
1 Month Performance30.59%4.71%1.70%3.99%
1 Year Performance-16.46%1.43%24.68%28.92%

Tandem Diabetes Care Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TNDM
Tandem Diabetes Care
2.4757 of 5 stars
$16.74
-0.1%
$29.84
+78.2%
-19.3%$1.15B$1.01BN/A2,500
MMED
MiniMed Group
4.4009 of 5 stars
$14.88
+4.6%
$21.33
+43.4%
N/A$4.00B$2.99BN/A8,000
LIVN
LivaNova
1.7708 of 5 stars
$74.80
+3.4%
$79.38
+6.1%
+74.2%$3.97B$1.39B38.363,300
NVST
Envista
2.3314 of 5 stars
$23.45
+1.5%
$28.83
+22.9%
+33.8%$3.76B$2.72B57.2012,000
IRTC
iRhythm Technologies
4.3241 of 5 stars
$107.23
-0.8%
$189.69
+76.9%
-20.9%$3.55B$747.14MN/A2,400

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:TNDM) was last updated on 6/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners