Go Pro
→ Trump’s New Currency Reset (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free TRI Stock Alerts

Thomson Reuters (TRI) Competitors

Thomson Reuters logo
$82.66 -1.21 (-1.44%)
Closing price 06/29/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$82.64 -0.02 (-0.03%)
As of 06/29/2026 05:56 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

TRI vs. NWS, PSO, WLY, WLYB, and MH

Should you buy Thomson Reuters stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Thomson Reuters with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Thomson Reuters include News (NWS), Pearson (PSO), John Wiley & Sons (WLY), John Wiley & Sons (WLYB), and McGraw Hill (MH). These companies are all part of the "printing and publishing" industry.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to News?

Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) and News (NASDAQ:NWS) are both large-cap printing and publishing companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Thomson Reuters presently has a consensus target price of $144.84, indicating a potential upside of 75.23%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than News.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Thomson Reuters
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.65
News
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to News' net margin of 12.92%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 14.99% beat News' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters19.93% 14.99% 10.06%
News 12.92%6.12%3.70%

17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.6% of News shares are held by institutional investors. 11.1% of News shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Thomson Reuters has higher earnings, but lower revenue than News. News is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thomson Reuters$7.48B4.82$1.50B$3.4424.03
News$8.45B1.85$1.18B$2.0114.21

In the previous week, News had 2 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for News and 4 mentions for Thomson Reuters. News' average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 1.16 indicating that News is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
News
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.77, indicating that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, News has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. News pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Thomson Reuters pays out 76.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. News pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats News on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Pearson?

Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) and Pearson (NYSE:PSO) are both printing and publishing companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 2 more articles in the media than Pearson. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 2 mentions for Pearson. Thomson Reuters' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Pearson's score of 0.00 indicating that Thomson Reuters is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Pearson
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than Pearson.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thomson Reuters$7.48B4.82$1.50B$3.4424.03
Pearson$4.72B1.99$441.77MN/AN/A

Thomson Reuters currently has a consensus price target of $144.84, suggesting a potential upside of 75.23%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Pearson.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Thomson Reuters
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.65
Pearson
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Pearson pays an annual dividend of $0.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Thomson Reuters pays out 76.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pearson has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to Pearson's net margin of 0.00%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 14.99% beat Pearson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters19.93% 14.99% 10.06%
Pearson N/A N/A N/A

17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.1% of Pearson shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pearson shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats Pearson on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to John Wiley & Sons?

Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) and John Wiley & Sons (NYSE:WLY) are both printing and publishing companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 1 more articles in the media than John Wiley & Sons. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 3 mentions for John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons' average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 1.16 indicating that John Wiley & Sons is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
John Wiley & Sons
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thomson Reuters$7.48B4.82$1.50B$3.4424.03
John Wiley & Sons$1.68B1.44$221.62M$4.2311.13

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.9% of John Wiley & Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.7% of John Wiley & Sons shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to John Wiley & Sons' net margin of 13.22%. John Wiley & Sons' return on equity of 29.01% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters19.93% 14.99% 10.06%
John Wiley & Sons 13.22%29.01%8.78%

Thomson Reuters currently has a consensus price target of $144.84, suggesting a potential upside of 75.23%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than John Wiley & Sons.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Thomson Reuters
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.65
John Wiley & Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. John Wiley & Sons pays an annual dividend of $1.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Thomson Reuters pays out 76.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. John Wiley & Sons pays out 33.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. John Wiley & Sons has raised its dividend for 26 consecutive years.

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats John Wiley & Sons on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to John Wiley & Sons?

John Wiley & Sons (NYSE:WLYB) and Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) are both printing and publishing companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Thomson Reuters has a consensus target price of $144.84, suggesting a potential upside of 75.23%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than John Wiley & Sons.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
John Wiley & Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Thomson Reuters
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.65

John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to John Wiley & Sons' net margin of 13.22%. John Wiley & Sons' return on equity of 29.01% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
John Wiley & Sons13.22% 29.01% 8.78%
Thomson Reuters 19.93%14.99%10.06%

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
John Wiley & Sons$1.68B1.44$221.62M$4.2311.09
Thomson Reuters$7.48B4.82$1.50B$3.4424.03

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 3 more articles in the media than John Wiley & Sons. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 1 mentions for John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons' average media sentiment score of 2.00 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 1.16 indicating that John Wiley & Sons is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
John Wiley & Sons Very Positive
Thomson Reuters Positive

John Wiley & Sons pays an annual dividend of $1.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. John Wiley & Sons pays out 33.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Thomson Reuters pays out 76.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. John Wiley & Sons has increased its dividend for 26 consecutive years.

0.5% of John Wiley & Sons shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. 29.7% of John Wiley & Sons shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats John Wiley & Sons on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to McGraw Hill?

Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) and McGraw Hill (NYSE:MH) are both manufacturing companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to McGraw Hill's net margin of 1.68%. McGraw Hill's return on equity of 57.92% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters19.93% 14.99% 10.06%
McGraw Hill 1.68%57.92%6.54%

In the previous week, McGraw Hill had 1 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for McGraw Hill and 4 mentions for Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat McGraw Hill's score of 0.40 indicating that Thomson Reuters is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
McGraw Hill
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than McGraw Hill. Thomson Reuters is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McGraw Hill, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thomson Reuters$7.48B4.82$1.50B$3.4424.03
McGraw Hill$2.10B0.84$35.32M$0.2046.37

17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of McGraw Hill shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Thomson Reuters presently has a consensus price target of $144.84, indicating a potential upside of 75.23%. McGraw Hill has a consensus price target of $18.72, indicating a potential upside of 101.84%. Given McGraw Hill's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe McGraw Hill is more favorable than Thomson Reuters.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Thomson Reuters
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.65
McGraw Hill
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats McGraw Hill on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Thomson Reuters News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TRI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TRI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TRI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricThomson ReutersMisc. Publishing IndustryManufacturing SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$36.58B$19.20B$4.40B$12.20B
Dividend Yield3.12%3.12%13.73%6.22%
P/E Ratio24.0535.2121.9524.36
Price / Sales4.822.83161.38102.46
Price / Cash13.657.9236.6236.93
Price / Book3.042.7413.206.49
Net Income$1.50B$768.66M$113.19M$336.61M
7 Day Performance2.42%-0.34%0.69%1.25%
1 Month Performance-4.45%-13.68%0.19%0.24%
1 Year PerformanceN/AN/A11.97%30.16%

Thomson Reuters Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TRI
Thomson Reuters
4.5663 of 5 stars		$82.66
-1.4%		$144.84
+75.2%		N/A$36.58B$7.48B24.0527,100
NWS
News
2.6828 of 5 stars		$28.75
flat		N/A-15.7%$15.74B$8.45B14.3025,500
PSO
Pearson
1.2848 of 5 stars		$14.89
+0.0%		N/A+5.1%$8.94B$4.72BN/A16,665
WLY
John Wiley & Sons
3.2699 of 5 stars		$46.76
+0.1%		N/A+4.0%$2.40B$1.68B11.055,200
WLYB
John Wiley & Sons
2.463 of 5 stars		$45.32
flat		N/A+4.0%$2.33B$1.68B10.719,500

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:TRI) was last updated on 6/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
The startup growing 23 times faster than Nvidia
An official SEC document contains a name Elon Musk revealed on page 146 - a startup that one analyst believes ...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ticker Revealed: Pre-IPO Access to "Next Elon Musk" Company
We’ve found The Next Elon Musk… and what we believe to be the next Tesla. It’s already racked up $26 billi...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Rickards Predicts: Trump to buy tiny $2 stock?
Jim Rickards believes the Trump administration is about to take a direct stake in a $2 stock sitting on the la...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
PH: Do THESE 4 things to your bank account now …
In a few short months, the US government could gain unprecedented powers over personal bank accounts - includi...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
A drilling crew just broke a record nobody expected
A drilling crew in Beaver County, Utah hit 15,765 feet of solid granite in 16 days - a job the Department of E...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel