Does the media prefer TRI or FDS?

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 29 more articles in the media than FactSet Research Systems. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 5 mentions for FactSet Research Systems. FactSet Research Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 0.46 indicating that FactSet Research Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Thomson Reuters 6 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 14 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral FactSet Research Systems 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer TRI or RELX?

Thomson Reuters currently has a consensus price target of $142.83, indicating a potential upside of 37.92%. Given Thomson Reuters' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Relx. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Thomson Reuters 1 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 10 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.65 Relx 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, TRI or RELX?

Relx has higher revenue and earnings than Thomson Reuters. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Thomson Reuters $7.83B 5.76 $1.50B $3.76 27.54 Relx $12.64B 4.94 $2.72B N/A N/A

Is TRI or RELX more profitable?

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 21.22% compared to Relx's net margin of 0.00%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 15.82% beat Relx's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Thomson Reuters 21.22% 15.82% 10.27% Relx N/A N/A N/A

Does the media refer more to TRI or RELX?

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 28 more articles in the media than Relx. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 6 mentions for Relx. Relx's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 0.46 indicating that Relx is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Thomson Reuters 6 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 14 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Relx 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor TRI or VRSK?

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 21 more articles in the media than Verisk Analytics. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 13 mentions for Verisk Analytics. Verisk Analytics' average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 0.46 indicating that Verisk Analytics is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Thomson Reuters 6 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 14 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Verisk Analytics 7 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher earnings and valuation, TRI or EFX?

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than Equifax. Thomson Reuters is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equifax, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Thomson Reuters $7.83B 5.76 $1.50B $3.76 27.54 Equifax $6.07B 3.50 $660.30M $5.69 31.78

Is TRI or EFX more profitable?

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 21.22% compared to Equifax's net margin of 10.73%. Equifax's return on equity of 21.61% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Thomson Reuters 21.22% 15.82% 10.27% Equifax 10.73% 21.61% 8.41%

Does the media prefer TRI or EFX?

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 8 more articles in the media than Equifax. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 26 mentions for Equifax. Equifax's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 0.46 indicating that Equifax is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Thomson Reuters 6 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 14 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Equifax 9 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer J or TRI?

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 12 more articles in the media than Jacobs Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 22 mentions for Jacobs Solutions. Jacobs Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 0.46 indicating that Jacobs Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Jacobs Solutions 13 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Thomson Reuters 6 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 14 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Thomson Reuters (TRI) Competitors

$103.54 +1.71 (+1.68%)

As of 01:29 PM Eastern

Compare

TRI vs. FDS, RELX, VRSK, EFX, and J

Should you buy Thomson Reuters stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Thomson Reuters with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Thomson Reuters include FactSet Research Systems (FDS), Relx (RELX), Verisk Analytics (VRSK), Equifax (EFX), and Jacobs Solutions (J).

How does Thomson Reuters compare to FactSet Research Systems?

Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) and FactSet Research Systems (NYSE:FDS) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. FactSet Research Systems pays an annual dividend of $4.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Thomson Reuters pays out 69.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. FactSet Research Systems pays out 30.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. FactSet Research Systems has increased its dividend for 27 consecutive years.

Thomson Reuters presently has a consensus target price of $142.83, suggesting a potential upside of 37.92%. FactSet Research Systems has a consensus target price of $253.00, suggesting a potential downside of 11.74%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than FactSet Research Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Thomson Reuters	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.65
FactSet Research Systems	6 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.83

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FactSet Research Systems has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 29 more articles in the media than FactSet Research Systems. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 5 mentions for FactSet Research Systems. FactSet Research Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 0.46 indicating that FactSet Research Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters	6 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	14 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
FactSet Research Systems	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

FactSet Research Systems has a net margin of 23.21% compared to Thomson Reuters' net margin of 21.22%. FactSet Research Systems' return on equity of 30.68% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters	21.22%	15.82%	10.27%
FactSet Research Systems	23.21%	30.68%	15.43%

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than FactSet Research Systems. FactSet Research Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Thomson Reuters	$7.83B	5.76	$1.50B	$3.76	27.54
FactSet Research Systems	$2.32B	4.39	$597.04M	$15.18	18.88

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats FactSet Research Systems on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Relx?

Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) and Relx (NYSE:RELX) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 28 more articles in the media than Relx. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 6 mentions for Relx. Relx's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 0.46 indicating that Relx is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters	6 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	14 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Relx	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.0% of Relx shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Relx shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Relx has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Relx pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Thomson Reuters pays out 69.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Thomson Reuters currently has a consensus price target of $142.83, indicating a potential upside of 37.92%. Given Thomson Reuters' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Relx.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Thomson Reuters	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.65
Relx	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 21.22% compared to Relx's net margin of 0.00%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 15.82% beat Relx's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters	21.22%	15.82%	10.27%
Relx	N/A	N/A	N/A

Relx has higher revenue and earnings than Thomson Reuters.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Thomson Reuters	$7.83B	5.76	$1.50B	$3.76	27.54
Relx	$12.64B	4.94	$2.72B	N/A	N/A

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats Relx on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Verisk Analytics?

Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) and Verisk Analytics (NASDAQ:VRSK) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 21 more articles in the media than Verisk Analytics. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 13 mentions for Verisk Analytics. Verisk Analytics' average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 0.46 indicating that Verisk Analytics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters	6 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	14 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Verisk Analytics	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Thomson Reuters currently has a consensus target price of $142.83, indicating a potential upside of 37.92%. Verisk Analytics has a consensus target price of $236.27, indicating a potential upside of 29.77%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Verisk Analytics.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Thomson Reuters	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.65
Verisk Analytics	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.53

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than Verisk Analytics. Thomson Reuters is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Verisk Analytics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Thomson Reuters	$7.83B	5.76	$1.50B	$3.76	27.54
Verisk Analytics	$3.07B	7.71	$908.30M	$6.51	27.97

Verisk Analytics has a net margin of 28.24% compared to Thomson Reuters' net margin of 21.22%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 15.82% beat Verisk Analytics' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters	21.22%	15.82%	10.27%
Verisk Analytics	28.24%	-239.55%	18.56%

17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Verisk Analytics shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Verisk Analytics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Verisk Analytics pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Thomson Reuters pays out 69.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Verisk Analytics pays out 30.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Verisk Analytics has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Verisk Analytics has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Verisk Analytics beats Thomson Reuters on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Equifax?

Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) and Equifax (NYSE:EFX) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than Equifax. Thomson Reuters is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equifax, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Thomson Reuters	$7.83B	5.76	$1.50B	$3.76	27.54
Equifax	$6.07B	3.50	$660.30M	$5.69	31.78

Thomson Reuters presently has a consensus target price of $142.83, indicating a potential upside of 37.92%. Equifax has a consensus target price of $215.79, indicating a potential upside of 19.32%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Equifax.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Thomson Reuters	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.65
Equifax	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 8 more articles in the media than Equifax. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 26 mentions for Equifax. Equifax's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 0.46 indicating that Equifax is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters	6 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	14 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Equifax	9 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Equifax pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Thomson Reuters pays out 69.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Equifax pays out 39.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Equifax has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.2% of Equifax shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Equifax shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Equifax has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 21.22% compared to Equifax's net margin of 10.73%. Equifax's return on equity of 21.61% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters	21.22%	15.82%	10.27%
Equifax	10.73%	21.61%	8.41%

Summary

Thomson Reuters and Equifax tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Jacobs Solutions?

Jacobs Solutions (NYSE:J) and Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 12 more articles in the media than Jacobs Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 22 mentions for Jacobs Solutions. Jacobs Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 0.46 indicating that Jacobs Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Jacobs Solutions	13 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Thomson Reuters	6 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	14 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Jacobs Solutions currently has a consensus price target of $152.22, suggesting a potential upside of 3.74%. Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $142.83, suggesting a potential upside of 37.92%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Jacobs Solutions.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Jacobs Solutions	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.45
Thomson Reuters	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.65

Thomson Reuters has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Jacobs Solutions. Thomson Reuters is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jacobs Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Jacobs Solutions	$12.03B	1.44	$289.34M	$2.82	52.04
Thomson Reuters	$7.83B	5.76	$1.50B	$3.76	27.54

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 21.22% compared to Jacobs Solutions' net margin of 2.40%. Jacobs Solutions' return on equity of 23.96% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Jacobs Solutions	2.40%	23.96%	7.02%
Thomson Reuters	21.22%	15.82%	10.27%

Jacobs Solutions has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

85.7% of Jacobs Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Jacobs Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Jacobs Solutions pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Jacobs Solutions pays out 51.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Thomson Reuters pays out 69.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Jacobs Solutions has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats Jacobs Solutions on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Thomson Reuters News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TRI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TRI vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Thomson Reuters	Professional Services Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$45.15B	$7.91B	$10.86B	$12.92B
Dividend Yield	2.62%	3.77%	97.10%	10.20%
P/E Ratio	27.60	39.10	28.40	24.82
Price / Sales	5.76	25.93	347.73	108.09
Price / Cash	16.57	22.88	24.70	37.44
Price / Book	3.81	7.04	4.92	6.44
Net Income	$1.50B	$238.96M	$607.14M	$347.27M
7 Day Performance	1.92%	2.37%	2.17%	2.55%
1 Month Performance	15.52%	8.00%	1.66%	-1.02%
1 Year Performance	-43.30%	-2.93%	14.65%	23.33%

Thomson Reuters Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TRI Thomson Reuters	4.7409 of 5 stars	$103.56 +1.7%	$142.83 +37.9%	-44.3%	$45.15B	$7.83B	27.60	27,100	Earnings Report Dividend Announcement
FDS FactSet Research Systems	3.7977 of 5 stars	$284.67 +3.7%	$253.00 -11.1%	-25.5%	$10.13B	$2.32B	18.75	12,800	Positive News
RELX Relx	2.4986 of 5 stars	$35.67 -0.2%	N/A	-25.9%	$62.60B	$12.64B	N/A	37,000	Positive News Ex-Dividend Analyst Upgrade
VRSK Verisk Analytics	4.9588 of 5 stars	$192.52 +1.5%	$236.27 +22.7%	-27.6%	$25.12B	$3.07B	29.64	8,000	Gap Down
EFX Equifax	4.4962 of 5 stars	$181.96 +3.5%	$215.79 +18.6%	-23.9%	$21.38B	$6.07B	31.98	15,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:TRI) was last updated on 8/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thomson Reuters (TRI) Competitors

TRI vs. FDS, RELX, VRSK, EFX, and J

How does Thomson Reuters compare to FactSet Research Systems?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Relx?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Verisk Analytics?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Equifax?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Jacobs Solutions?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TRI vs. The Competition

Thomson Reuters Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Thomson Reuters (TRI) Competitors

TRI vs. FDS, RELX, VRSK, EFX, and J

How does Thomson Reuters compare to FactSet Research Systems?

Is TRI or FDS a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend TRI or FDS?

Which has more volatility & risk, TRI or FDS?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of TRI or FDS?

Does the media prefer TRI or FDS?

Is TRI or FDS more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, TRI or FDS?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Relx?

Does the media refer more to TRI or RELX?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in TRI or RELX?

Which has more volatility & risk, TRI or RELX?

Is TRI or RELX a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer TRI or RELX?

Is TRI or RELX more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, TRI or RELX?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Verisk Analytics?

Does the media favor TRI or VRSK?

Do analysts rate TRI or VRSK?

Which has better earnings and valuation, TRI or VRSK?

Is TRI or VRSK more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in TRI or VRSK?

Is TRI or VRSK a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, TRI or VRSK?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Equifax?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, TRI or EFX?

Do analysts prefer TRI or EFX?

Does the media prefer TRI or EFX?

Is TRI or EFX a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in TRI or EFX?

Which has more volatility and risk, TRI or EFX?

Is TRI or EFX more profitable?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Jacobs Solutions?

Does the media prefer J or TRI?

Do analysts recommend J or TRI?

Which has better valuation and earnings, J or TRI?

Is J or TRI more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, J or TRI?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of J or TRI?

Is J or TRI a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TRI vs. The Competition

Thomson Reuters Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools