Does the media prefer TRI or FDS?

In the previous week, FactSet Research Systems had 9 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for FactSet Research Systems and 18 mentions for Thomson Reuters. FactSet Research Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 1.33 indicating that FactSet Research Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Thomson Reuters 13 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive FactSet Research Systems 23 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend RELX or TRI?

Thomson Reuters has a consensus target price of $131.57, suggesting a potential upside of 23.86%. Given Thomson Reuters' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Relx. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Relx 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75 Thomson Reuters 0 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 10 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.71

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, RELX or TRI?

Relx has higher revenue and earnings than Thomson Reuters. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Relx $9.72B 6.57 $2.72B N/A N/A Thomson Reuters $7.48B 6.19 $1.50B $3.76 28.25

Is RELX or TRI more profitable?

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 21.22% compared to Relx's net margin of 0.00%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 15.82% beat Relx's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Relx N/A N/A N/A Thomson Reuters 21.22% 15.82% 10.27%

Does the media favor RELX or TRI?

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 16 more articles in the media than Relx. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 2 mentions for Relx. Thomson Reuters' average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat Relx's score of 0.42 indicating that Thomson Reuters is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Relx 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Thomson Reuters 13 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor VRSK or TRI?

In the previous week, Verisk Analytics had 13 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for Verisk Analytics and 18 mentions for Thomson Reuters. Verisk Analytics' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 1.33 indicating that Verisk Analytics is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Verisk Analytics 30 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Thomson Reuters 13 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, TRI or EFX?

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than Equifax. Thomson Reuters is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equifax, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Thomson Reuters $7.48B 6.19 $1.50B $3.76 28.25 Equifax $6.07B 3.76 $660.30M $5.69 34.16

Is TRI or EFX more profitable?

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 21.22% compared to Equifax's net margin of 10.73%. Equifax's return on equity of 21.61% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Thomson Reuters 21.22% 15.82% 10.27% Equifax 10.73% 21.61% 8.41%

Does the media prefer TRI or EFX?

In the previous week, Equifax had 2 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Equifax and 18 mentions for Thomson Reuters. Equifax's average media sentiment score of 1.62 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 1.33 indicating that Equifax is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Thomson Reuters 13 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Equifax 18 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Does the media favor J or TRI?

In the previous week, Jacobs Solutions had 10 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Jacobs Solutions and 18 mentions for Thomson Reuters. Jacobs Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.70 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 1.33 indicating that Jacobs Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Jacobs Solutions 25 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Thomson Reuters 13 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Thomson Reuters (TRI) Competitors

$106.22 +1.44 (+1.37%)

As of 08/28/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Compare

TRI vs. FDS, RELX, VRSK, EFX, and J

Should you buy Thomson Reuters stock or one of its competitors? Thomson Reuters's main competitors and comparable companies include FactSet Research Systems (FDS), Relx (RELX), Verisk Analytics (VRSK), Equifax (EFX), and Jacobs Solutions (J). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to FactSet Research Systems?

Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) and FactSet Research Systems (NYSE:FDS) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

FactSet Research Systems has a net margin of 23.21% compared to Thomson Reuters' net margin of 21.22%. FactSet Research Systems' return on equity of 30.68% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters	21.22%	15.82%	10.27%
FactSet Research Systems	23.21%	30.68%	15.43%

17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than FactSet Research Systems. FactSet Research Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Thomson Reuters	$7.48B	6.19	$1.50B	$3.76	28.25
FactSet Research Systems	$2.44B	4.52	$597.04M	$15.18	20.40

In the previous week, FactSet Research Systems had 9 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for FactSet Research Systems and 18 mentions for Thomson Reuters. FactSet Research Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 1.33 indicating that FactSet Research Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters	13 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
FactSet Research Systems	23 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Thomson Reuters currently has a consensus price target of $131.57, indicating a potential upside of 23.86%. FactSet Research Systems has a consensus price target of $257.57, indicating a potential downside of 16.81%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than FactSet Research Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Thomson Reuters	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
FactSet Research Systems	6 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.83

Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. FactSet Research Systems pays an annual dividend of $4.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Thomson Reuters pays out 69.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. FactSet Research Systems pays out 30.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. FactSet Research Systems has increased its dividend for 27 consecutive years.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FactSet Research Systems has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

FactSet Research Systems beats Thomson Reuters on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Relx?

Relx (NYSE:RELX) and Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Relx has higher revenue and earnings than Thomson Reuters.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Relx	$9.72B	6.57	$2.72B	N/A	N/A
Thomson Reuters	$7.48B	6.19	$1.50B	$3.76	28.25

15.0% of Relx shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Relx shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 21.22% compared to Relx's net margin of 0.00%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 15.82% beat Relx's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Relx	N/A	N/A	N/A
Thomson Reuters	21.22%	15.82%	10.27%

Relx pays an annual dividend of $0.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Thomson Reuters pays out 69.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Relx has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Thomson Reuters has a consensus target price of $131.57, suggesting a potential upside of 23.86%. Given Thomson Reuters' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Relx.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Relx	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Thomson Reuters	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 16 more articles in the media than Relx. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 2 mentions for Relx. Thomson Reuters' average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat Relx's score of 0.42 indicating that Thomson Reuters is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Relx	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Thomson Reuters	13 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats Relx on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Verisk Analytics?

Verisk Analytics (NASDAQ:VRSK) and Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Verisk Analytics has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Verisk Analytics has a net margin of 28.24% compared to Thomson Reuters' net margin of 21.22%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 15.82% beat Verisk Analytics' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Verisk Analytics	28.24%	-239.55%	18.56%
Thomson Reuters	21.22%	15.82%	10.27%

90.0% of Verisk Analytics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Verisk Analytics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Verisk Analytics currently has a consensus price target of $236.27, suggesting a potential upside of 23.20%. Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $131.57, suggesting a potential upside of 23.86%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Verisk Analytics.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Verisk Analytics	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.53
Thomson Reuters	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

Verisk Analytics pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Verisk Analytics pays out 30.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Thomson Reuters pays out 69.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Verisk Analytics has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than Verisk Analytics. Thomson Reuters is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Verisk Analytics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Verisk Analytics	$3.14B	7.96	$908.30M	$6.51	29.46
Thomson Reuters	$7.48B	6.19	$1.50B	$3.76	28.25

In the previous week, Verisk Analytics had 13 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for Verisk Analytics and 18 mentions for Thomson Reuters. Verisk Analytics' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 1.33 indicating that Verisk Analytics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Verisk Analytics	30 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Thomson Reuters	13 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Verisk Analytics beats Thomson Reuters on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Equifax?

Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) and Equifax (NYSE:EFX) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Equifax had 2 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Equifax and 18 mentions for Thomson Reuters. Equifax's average media sentiment score of 1.62 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 1.33 indicating that Equifax is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters	13 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Equifax	18 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.2% of Equifax shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Equifax shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Thomson Reuters presently has a consensus price target of $131.57, suggesting a potential upside of 23.86%. Equifax has a consensus price target of $216.89, suggesting a potential upside of 11.60%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Equifax.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Thomson Reuters	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
Equifax	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Equifax has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 21.22% compared to Equifax's net margin of 10.73%. Equifax's return on equity of 21.61% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters	21.22%	15.82%	10.27%
Equifax	10.73%	21.61%	8.41%

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than Equifax. Thomson Reuters is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Equifax, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Thomson Reuters	$7.48B	6.19	$1.50B	$3.76	28.25
Equifax	$6.07B	3.76	$660.30M	$5.69	34.16

Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Equifax pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Thomson Reuters pays out 69.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Equifax pays out 39.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Equifax has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Equifax beats Thomson Reuters on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Jacobs Solutions?

Jacobs Solutions (NYSE:J) and Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability and risk.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 21.22% compared to Jacobs Solutions' net margin of 2.40%. Jacobs Solutions' return on equity of 23.96% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Jacobs Solutions	2.40%	23.96%	7.02%
Thomson Reuters	21.22%	15.82%	10.27%

Thomson Reuters has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Jacobs Solutions. Thomson Reuters is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jacobs Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Jacobs Solutions	$14.22B	1.26	$289.34M	$2.82	53.96
Thomson Reuters	$7.48B	6.19	$1.50B	$3.76	28.25

Jacobs Solutions pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Jacobs Solutions pays out 51.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Thomson Reuters pays out 69.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Jacobs Solutions has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Jacobs Solutions had 10 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Jacobs Solutions and 18 mentions for Thomson Reuters. Jacobs Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.70 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 1.33 indicating that Jacobs Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Jacobs Solutions	25 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Thomson Reuters	13 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Jacobs Solutions currently has a consensus target price of $153.70, indicating a potential upside of 1.01%. Thomson Reuters has a consensus target price of $131.57, indicating a potential upside of 23.86%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Jacobs Solutions.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Jacobs Solutions	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Thomson Reuters	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

85.7% of Jacobs Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Jacobs Solutions shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Jacobs Solutions has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats Jacobs Solutions on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Thomson Reuters News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TRI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TRI vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Thomson Reuters	Professional Services Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$46.27B	$7.72B	$10.52B	$12.90B
Dividend Yield	2.47%	3.70%	97.24%	11.28%
P/E Ratio	28.28	37.73	26.37	25.45
Price / Sales	6.19	25.64	354.71	76.58
Price / Cash	17.29	23.18	24.38	53.00
Price / Book	4.16	7.42	4.64	6.14
Net Income	$1.50B	$236.65M	$611.08M	$348.86M
7 Day Performance	0.65%	0.12%	-0.86%	-0.80%
1 Month Performance	7.48%	4.18%	1.92%	4.13%
1 Year Performance	-41.08%	-3.68%	10.97%	15.17%

Thomson Reuters Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TRI Thomson Reuters	4.6026 of 5 stars	$106.22 +1.4%	$131.57 +23.9%	-41.1%	$46.27B	$7.48B	28.28	27,100	News Coverage Positive News
FDS FactSet Research Systems	3.8408 of 5 stars	$307.52 +1.0%	$257.57 -16.2%	-17.0%	$10.94B	$2.32B	20.26	12,800	News Coverage Positive News Analyst Forecast
RELX Relx	1.8437 of 5 stars	$36.49 +0.5%	N/A	-21.7%	$63.86B	$12.64B	N/A	37,000	Short Interest Increase
VRSK Verisk Analytics	4.9052 of 5 stars	$191.78 +0.4%	$236.27 +23.2%	-28.5%	$24.96B	$3.07B	29.46	8,000	News Coverage Positive News Analyst Upgrade
EFX Equifax	4.4729 of 5 stars	$195.32 +2.6%	$216.89 +11.0%	-21.0%	$22.95B	$6.07B	34.33	15,000	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:TRI) was last updated on 8/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thomson Reuters (TRI) Competitors

TRI vs. FDS, RELX, VRSK, EFX, and J

How does Thomson Reuters compare to FactSet Research Systems?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Relx?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Verisk Analytics?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Equifax?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Jacobs Solutions?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TRI vs. The Competition

Thomson Reuters Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Thomson Reuters (TRI) Competitors

TRI vs. FDS, RELX, VRSK, EFX, and J

How does Thomson Reuters compare to FactSet Research Systems?

Is TRI or FDS more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in TRI or FDS?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, TRI or FDS?

Does the media prefer TRI or FDS?

Do analysts recommend TRI or FDS?

Is TRI or FDS a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, TRI or FDS?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Relx?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, RELX or TRI?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of RELX or TRI?

Is RELX or TRI more profitable?

Is RELX or TRI a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, RELX or TRI?

Do analysts recommend RELX or TRI?

Does the media favor RELX or TRI?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Verisk Analytics?

Which has more risk & volatility, VRSK or TRI?

Is VRSK or TRI more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of VRSK or TRI?

Do analysts recommend VRSK or TRI?

Is VRSK or TRI a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, VRSK or TRI?

Does the media favor VRSK or TRI?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Equifax?

Does the media prefer TRI or EFX?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of TRI or EFX?

Do analysts rate TRI or EFX?

Which has more volatility and risk, TRI or EFX?

Is TRI or EFX more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, TRI or EFX?

Is TRI or EFX a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Jacobs Solutions?

Is J or TRI more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, J or TRI?

Is J or TRI a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor J or TRI?

Do analysts rate J or TRI?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of J or TRI?

Which has more risk & volatility, J or TRI?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TRI vs. The Competition

Thomson Reuters Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools