Does the media prefer TRI or FDS?

In the previous week, FactSet Research Systems had 10 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for FactSet Research Systems and 2 mentions for Thomson Reuters. FactSet Research Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 0.00 indicating that FactSet Research Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Thomson Reuters 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral FactSet Research Systems 5 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer TRI or RELX?

Thomson Reuters presently has a consensus price target of $131.57, indicating a potential upside of 27.47%. Given Thomson Reuters' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Relx. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Thomson Reuters 0 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 10 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.71 Relx 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 2 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has higher valuation and earnings, TRI or RELX?

Relx has higher revenue and earnings than Thomson Reuters. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Thomson Reuters $7.48B 5.98 $1.50B $3.76 27.45 Relx $12.64B 4.99 $2.72B N/A N/A

Is TRI or RELX more profitable?

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 21.22% compared to Relx's net margin of 0.00%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 15.82% beat Relx's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Thomson Reuters 21.22% 15.82% 10.27% Relx N/A N/A N/A

Does the media favor TRI or VRSK?

In the previous week, Verisk Analytics had 3 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Verisk Analytics and 2 mentions for Thomson Reuters. Verisk Analytics' average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 0.00 indicating that Verisk Analytics is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Thomson Reuters 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Verisk Analytics 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings and valuation, EFX or TRI?

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than Equifax. Equifax is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Equifax $6.07B 2.82 $660.30M $5.69 25.60 Thomson Reuters $7.48B 5.98 $1.50B $3.76 27.45

Is EFX or TRI more profitable?

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 21.22% compared to Equifax's net margin of 10.73%. Equifax's return on equity of 21.61% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Equifax 10.73% 21.61% 8.41% Thomson Reuters 21.22% 15.82% 10.27%

Does the media favor EFX or TRI?

In the previous week, Equifax had 4 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Equifax and 2 mentions for Thomson Reuters. Equifax's average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 0.00 indicating that Equifax is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Equifax 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Thomson Reuters 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer J or TRI?

In the previous week, Jacobs Solutions had 3 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Jacobs Solutions and 2 mentions for Thomson Reuters. Jacobs Solutions' average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 0.00 indicating that Jacobs Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Jacobs Solutions 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Thomson Reuters 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Thomson Reuters (TRI) Competitors

$103.21 +1.66 (+1.63%)

Closing price 10/9/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$101.76 -1.46 (-1.41%)

As of 10/9/2026 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

TRI vs. FDS, RELX, VRSK, EFX, and J

Should you buy Thomson Reuters stock or one of its competitors? Thomson Reuters's main competitors and comparable companies include FactSet Research Systems (FDS), Relx (RELX), Verisk Analytics (VRSK), Equifax (EFX), and Jacobs Solutions (J). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to FactSet Research Systems?

Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) and FactSet Research Systems (NYSE:FDS) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

Thomson Reuters presently has a consensus target price of $131.57, indicating a potential upside of 27.47%. FactSet Research Systems has a consensus target price of $270.79, indicating a potential downside of 5.59%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than FactSet Research Systems.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Thomson Reuters	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
FactSet Research Systems	6 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.89

17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FactSet Research Systems has a net margin of 21.54% compared to Thomson Reuters' net margin of 21.22%. FactSet Research Systems' return on equity of 31.66% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters	21.22%	15.82%	10.27%
FactSet Research Systems	21.54%	31.66%	15.73%

In the previous week, FactSet Research Systems had 10 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for FactSet Research Systems and 2 mentions for Thomson Reuters. FactSet Research Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 0.00 indicating that FactSet Research Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
FactSet Research Systems	5 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FactSet Research Systems has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. FactSet Research Systems pays an annual dividend of $4.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Thomson Reuters pays out 69.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. FactSet Research Systems pays out 31.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. FactSet Research Systems has increased its dividend for 27 consecutive years.

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than FactSet Research Systems. FactSet Research Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Thomson Reuters	$7.48B	5.98	$1.50B	$3.76	27.45
FactSet Research Systems	$2.48B	4.12	$533.48M	$14.56	19.70

Summary

FactSet Research Systems beats Thomson Reuters on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Relx?

Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) and Relx (NYSE:RELX) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Relx pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Thomson Reuters pays out 69.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 21.22% compared to Relx's net margin of 0.00%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 15.82% beat Relx's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters	21.22%	15.82%	10.27%
Relx	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 2 more articles in the media than Relx. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 0 mentions for Relx. Relx's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 0.00 indicating that Relx is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters	Neutral
Relx	Neutral

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Relx has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.0% of Relx shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Relx shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Relx has higher revenue and earnings than Thomson Reuters.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Thomson Reuters	$7.48B	5.98	$1.50B	$3.76	27.45
Relx	$12.64B	4.99	$2.72B	N/A	N/A

Thomson Reuters presently has a consensus price target of $131.57, indicating a potential upside of 27.47%. Given Thomson Reuters' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Relx.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Thomson Reuters	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
Relx	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats Relx on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Verisk Analytics?

Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) and Verisk Analytics (NASDAQ:VRSK) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Verisk Analytics has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Verisk Analytics had 3 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Verisk Analytics and 2 mentions for Thomson Reuters. Verisk Analytics' average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 0.00 indicating that Verisk Analytics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Verisk Analytics	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Verisk Analytics has a net margin of 28.24% compared to Thomson Reuters' net margin of 21.22%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 15.82% beat Verisk Analytics' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters	21.22%	15.82%	10.27%
Verisk Analytics	28.24%	-239.55%	18.56%

Thomson Reuters presently has a consensus target price of $131.57, suggesting a potential upside of 27.47%. Verisk Analytics has a consensus target price of $226.71, suggesting a potential upside of 27.63%. Given Verisk Analytics' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Verisk Analytics is more favorable than Thomson Reuters.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Thomson Reuters	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
Verisk Analytics	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.53

17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Verisk Analytics shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Verisk Analytics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Verisk Analytics pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Thomson Reuters pays out 69.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Verisk Analytics pays out 30.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Verisk Analytics has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than Verisk Analytics. Verisk Analytics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Thomson Reuters	$7.48B	5.98	$1.50B	$3.76	27.45
Verisk Analytics	$3.07B	7.52	$908.30M	$6.51	27.29

Summary

Verisk Analytics beats Thomson Reuters on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Equifax?

Equifax (NYSE:EFX) and Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Equifax currently has a consensus target price of $206.90, suggesting a potential upside of 42.01%. Thomson Reuters has a consensus target price of $131.57, suggesting a potential upside of 27.47%. Given Equifax's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Equifax is more favorable than Thomson Reuters.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Equifax	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
Thomson Reuters	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

Equifax has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than Equifax. Equifax is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Equifax	$6.07B	2.82	$660.30M	$5.69	25.60
Thomson Reuters	$7.48B	5.98	$1.50B	$3.76	27.45

96.2% of Equifax shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Equifax shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Equifax had 4 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Equifax and 2 mentions for Thomson Reuters. Equifax's average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 0.00 indicating that Equifax is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Equifax	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Thomson Reuters	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Equifax pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Equifax pays out 39.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Thomson Reuters pays out 69.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Equifax has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 21.22% compared to Equifax's net margin of 10.73%. Equifax's return on equity of 21.61% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Equifax	10.73%	21.61%	8.41%
Thomson Reuters	21.22%	15.82%	10.27%

Summary

Equifax beats Thomson Reuters on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Jacobs Solutions?

Jacobs Solutions (NYSE:J) and Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Thomson Reuters has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Jacobs Solutions. Thomson Reuters is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jacobs Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Jacobs Solutions	$12.03B	1.37	$289.34M	$2.82	49.39
Thomson Reuters	$7.48B	5.98	$1.50B	$3.76	27.45

Jacobs Solutions presently has a consensus target price of $154.80, indicating a potential upside of 11.14%. Thomson Reuters has a consensus target price of $131.57, indicating a potential upside of 27.47%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Jacobs Solutions.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Jacobs Solutions	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Thomson Reuters	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

Jacobs Solutions pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Jacobs Solutions pays out 51.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Thomson Reuters pays out 69.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Jacobs Solutions has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

85.7% of Jacobs Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Jacobs Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Jacobs Solutions had 3 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Jacobs Solutions and 2 mentions for Thomson Reuters. Jacobs Solutions' average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 0.00 indicating that Jacobs Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Jacobs Solutions	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Thomson Reuters	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 21.22% compared to Jacobs Solutions' net margin of 2.40%. Jacobs Solutions' return on equity of 23.96% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Jacobs Solutions	2.40%	23.96%	7.02%
Thomson Reuters	21.22%	15.82%	10.27%

Jacobs Solutions has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats Jacobs Solutions on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Thomson Reuters News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TRI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TRI vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Thomson Reuters	Professional Services Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$44.00B	$7.80B	$10.12B	$13.21B
Dividend Yield	2.58%	3.75%	96.64%	20.71%
P/E Ratio	27.48	37.17	26.66	26.16
Price / Sales	5.98	24.33	268.46	95.24
Price / Cash	16.53	22.12	23.83	53.09
Price / Book	3.80	6.93	4.77	6.34
Net Income	$1.50B	$236.73M	$615.96M	$381.90M
7 Day Performance	5.73%	1.88%	-1.13%	-1.39%
1 Month Performance	6.42%	-1.40%	-3.03%	-4.31%
1 Year Performance	-32.25%	-10.41%	1.63%	-0.35%

Thomson Reuters Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TRI Thomson Reuters	3.7587 of 5 stars	$103.21 +1.6%	$131.57 +27.5%	-32.3%	$44.00B	$7.48B	27.48	27,100
FDS FactSet Research Systems	3.8738 of 5 stars	$284.31 -0.8%	$270.79 -4.8%	+1.4%	$10.10B	$2.48B	19.51	12,800
RELX Relx	2.853 of 5 stars	$36.08 +2.4%	N/A	-20.0%	$63.02B	$9.72B	N/A	37,000
VRSK Verisk Analytics	4.8403 of 5 stars	$176.80 +0.7%	$226.71 +28.2%	-26.4%	$23.04B	$3.14B	27.20	8,000
EFX Equifax	4.9621 of 5 stars	$145.13 -0.3%	$206.90 +42.6%	-37.5%	$17.05B	$6.44B	25.50	15,000	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:TRI) was last updated on 10/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thomson Reuters (TRI) Competitors

TRI vs. FDS, RELX, VRSK, EFX, and J

How does Thomson Reuters compare to FactSet Research Systems?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Relx?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Verisk Analytics?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Equifax?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Jacobs Solutions?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TRI vs. The Competition

Thomson Reuters Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Thomson Reuters (TRI) Competitors

TRI vs. FDS, RELX, VRSK, EFX, and J

How does Thomson Reuters compare to FactSet Research Systems?

Do analysts recommend TRI or FDS?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in TRI or FDS?

Is TRI or FDS more profitable?

Does the media prefer TRI or FDS?

Which has more risk and volatility, TRI or FDS?

Is TRI or FDS a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, TRI or FDS?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Relx?

Is TRI or RELX a better dividend stock?

Is TRI or RELX more profitable?

Does the media refer more to TRI or RELX?

Which has more volatility & risk, TRI or RELX?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in TRI or RELX?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, TRI or RELX?

Do analysts prefer TRI or RELX?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Verisk Analytics?

Which has more volatility & risk, TRI or VRSK?

Does the media favor TRI or VRSK?

Is TRI or VRSK more profitable?

Do analysts recommend TRI or VRSK?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in TRI or VRSK?

Is TRI or VRSK a better dividend stock?

Which has better valuation & earnings, TRI or VRSK?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Equifax?

Do analysts rate EFX or TRI?

Which has more volatility and risk, EFX or TRI?

Which has better earnings and valuation, EFX or TRI?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of EFX or TRI?

Does the media favor EFX or TRI?

Is EFX or TRI a better dividend stock?

Is EFX or TRI more profitable?

Summary

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Jacobs Solutions?

Which has better valuation and earnings, J or TRI?

Do analysts recommend J or TRI?

Is J or TRI a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of J or TRI?

Does the media prefer J or TRI?

Is J or TRI more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, J or TRI?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TRI vs. The Competition

Thomson Reuters Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools