Go Pro
→ A letter from Shannon Stansberry (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free TRI Stock Alerts

Thomson Reuters (TRI) Competitors

Thomson Reuters logo
$95.43 -0.77 (-0.80%)
Closing price 07/20/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$95.15 -0.28 (-0.29%)
As of 05:23 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

TRI vs. NWS, PSO, WLYB, WLY, and MH

Should you buy Thomson Reuters stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Thomson Reuters with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Thomson Reuters include News (NWS), Pearson (PSO), John Wiley & Sons (WLYB), John Wiley & Sons (WLY), and McGraw Hill (MH). These companies are all part of the "printing and publishing" industry.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to News?

News (NASDAQ:NWS) and Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) are both large-cap printing and publishing companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation and earnings.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to News' net margin of 12.92%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 14.99% beat News' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
News12.92% 6.12% 3.70%
Thomson Reuters 19.93%14.99%10.06%

News has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $143.92, indicating a potential upside of 50.81%. Given Thomson Reuters' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than News.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
News
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.50
Thomson Reuters
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

News pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. News pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Thomson Reuters pays out 76.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

14.6% of News shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. 11.1% of News shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Thomson Reuters has lower revenue, but higher earnings than News. News is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
News$8.45B2.09$1.18B$2.0116.02
Thomson Reuters$7.48B5.56$1.50B$3.4427.74

In the previous week, News had 2 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for News and 5 mentions for Thomson Reuters. News' average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 0.51 indicating that News is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
News
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Thomson Reuters
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats News on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Pearson?

Pearson (NYSE:PSO) and Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) are both large-cap printing and publishing companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to Pearson's net margin of 0.00%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 14.99% beat Pearson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PearsonN/A N/A N/A
Thomson Reuters 19.93%14.99%10.06%

Thomson Reuters has a consensus target price of $143.92, suggesting a potential upside of 50.81%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Pearson.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pearson
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Thomson Reuters
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Pearson pays an annual dividend of $0.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Thomson Reuters pays out 76.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

2.1% of Pearson shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pearson shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Pearson and Pearson both had 5 articles in the media. Thomson Reuters' average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Pearson's score of 0.19 indicating that Thomson Reuters is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pearson
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Thomson Reuters
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Pearson has a beta of 0.37, indicating that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.77, indicating that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than Pearson.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pearson$4.72B2.12$441.77MN/AN/A
Thomson Reuters$7.48B5.56$1.50B$3.4427.74

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats Pearson on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to John Wiley & Sons?

John Wiley & Sons (NYSE:WLYB) and Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) are both printing and publishing companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to John Wiley & Sons' net margin of 13.22%. John Wiley & Sons' return on equity of 29.01% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
John Wiley & Sons13.22% 29.01% 8.78%
Thomson Reuters 19.93%14.99%10.06%

John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.77, indicating that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

John Wiley & Sons pays an annual dividend of $1.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. John Wiley & Sons pays out 33.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Thomson Reuters pays out 76.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. John Wiley & Sons has increased its dividend for 26 consecutive years. John Wiley & Sons is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
John Wiley & Sons$1.68B1.50$221.62M$4.2311.72
Thomson Reuters$7.48B5.56$1.50B$3.4427.74

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 5 more articles in the media than John Wiley & Sons. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 0 mentions for John Wiley & Sons. Thomson Reuters' average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat John Wiley & Sons' score of 0.00 indicating that Thomson Reuters is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
John Wiley & Sons Neutral
Thomson Reuters Positive

0.5% of John Wiley & Sons shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. 29.7% of John Wiley & Sons shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $143.92, indicating a potential upside of 50.81%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than John Wiley & Sons.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
John Wiley & Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Thomson Reuters
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats John Wiley & Sons on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to John Wiley & Sons?

Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) and John Wiley & Sons (NYSE:WLY) are both printing and publishing companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.9% of John Wiley & Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.7% of John Wiley & Sons shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Thomson Reuters presently has a consensus target price of $143.92, suggesting a potential upside of 50.81%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than John Wiley & Sons.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Thomson Reuters
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
John Wiley & Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. John Wiley & Sons pays an annual dividend of $1.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Thomson Reuters pays out 76.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. John Wiley & Sons pays out 33.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. John Wiley & Sons has increased its dividend for 26 consecutive years. John Wiley & Sons is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Thomson Reuters had 3 more articles in the media than John Wiley & Sons. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Thomson Reuters and 2 mentions for John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Thomson Reuters' score of 0.51 indicating that John Wiley & Sons is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
John Wiley & Sons
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thomson Reuters$7.48B5.56$1.50B$3.4427.74
John Wiley & Sons$1.68B1.52$221.62M$4.2311.85

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to John Wiley & Sons' net margin of 13.22%. John Wiley & Sons' return on equity of 29.01% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters19.93% 14.99% 10.06%
John Wiley & Sons 13.22%29.01%8.78%

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats John Wiley & Sons on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to McGraw Hill?

McGraw Hill (NYSE:MH) and Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) are both manufacturing companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than McGraw Hill. Thomson Reuters is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than McGraw Hill, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McGraw Hill$2.10B0.87$35.32M$0.2048.02
Thomson Reuters$7.48B5.56$1.50B$3.4427.74

17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of McGraw Hill shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to McGraw Hill's net margin of 1.68%. McGraw Hill's return on equity of 57.92% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
McGraw Hill1.68% 57.92% 6.54%
Thomson Reuters 19.93%14.99%10.06%

McGraw Hill currently has a consensus target price of $18.47, suggesting a potential upside of 92.30%. Thomson Reuters has a consensus target price of $143.92, suggesting a potential upside of 50.81%. Given McGraw Hill's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe McGraw Hill is more favorable than Thomson Reuters.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
McGraw Hill
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Thomson Reuters
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

In the previous week, McGraw Hill and McGraw Hill both had 5 articles in the media. Thomson Reuters' average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat McGraw Hill's score of 0.10 indicating that Thomson Reuters is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
McGraw Hill
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Thomson Reuters
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats McGraw Hill on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Thomson Reuters News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TRI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TRI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TRI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricThomson ReutersMisc. Publishing IndustryManufacturing SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$41.89B$21.87B$4.39B$12.28B
Dividend Yield2.72%2.72%38.14%9.39%
P/E Ratio27.7737.8923.5423.94
Price / Sales5.563.22135.4590.33
Price / Cash15.668.9530.1747.25
Price / Book3.513.0212.256.14
Net Income$1.50B$768.66M$120.21M$331.74M
7 Day Performance4.02%-0.52%-1.84%-1.82%
1 Month Performance21.44%10.13%-2.11%-1.45%
1 Year PerformanceN/AN/A9.79%16.32%

Thomson Reuters Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TRI
Thomson Reuters
3.9966 of 5 stars		$95.43
-0.8%		$143.92
+50.8%		N/A$41.89B$7.48B27.7727,100
NWS
News
4.014 of 5 stars		$30.93
-0.6%		N/A-6.5%$16.93B$8.45B15.3925,500
PSO
Pearson
1.8604 of 5 stars		$16.92
+0.2%		N/A+17.3%$10.17B$4.72BN/A16,665
WLYB
John Wiley & Sons
1.921 of 5 stars		$50.72
+0.1%		N/A+26.1%$2.57B$1.68B11.999,500
WLY
John Wiley & Sons
2.8531 of 5 stars		$50.24
-0.4%		N/A+27.7%$2.55B$1.68B11.884,500

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:TRI) was last updated on 7/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
BofA: Digital Dollar Coming 2025-2030
Bank of America just revealed your expiration date. In their Bloomberg interview, they didn't just predict the...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon’s new "tollbooth"
The SpaceX IPO was valued at $1.75 trillion. But one analyst says fighting over those shares may be the wrong ...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel