Free Trial

Thomson Reuters (TRI) Competitors

Thomson Reuters logo
$82.32 -0.86 (-1.03%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$83.24 +0.92 (+1.11%)
As of 07:38 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

TRI vs. NWS, PSO, MH, WLY, and WLYB

Should you buy Thomson Reuters stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Thomson Reuters with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Thomson Reuters include News (NWS), Pearson (PSO), McGraw Hill (MH), John Wiley & Sons (WLY), and John Wiley & Sons (WLYB). These companies are all part of the "printing and publishing" industry.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to News?

Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) and News (NASDAQ:NWS) are both large-cap printing and publishing companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability and dividends.

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.77, indicating that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, News has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.6% of News shares are held by institutional investors. 11.1% of News shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. News pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Thomson Reuters pays out 76.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. News pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to News' net margin of 12.92%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 14.99% beat News' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters19.93% 14.99% 10.06%
News 12.92%6.12%3.70%

Thomson Reuters has higher earnings, but lower revenue than News. News is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thomson Reuters$7.66B4.69$1.50B$3.4423.93
News$8.45B2.01$1.18B$2.0115.45

Thomson Reuters presently has a consensus price target of $144.84, indicating a potential upside of 75.95%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than News.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Thomson Reuters
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
News
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, News had 5 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for News and 2 mentions for Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters' average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat News' score of 0.98 indicating that Thomson Reuters is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
News
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats News on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to Pearson?

Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) and Pearson (NYSE:PSO) are both printing and publishing companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than Pearson.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thomson Reuters$7.66B4.69$1.50B$3.4423.93
Pearson$4.72B1.99$441.77MN/AN/A

Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pearson has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Thomson Reuters presently has a consensus price target of $144.84, suggesting a potential upside of 75.95%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than Pearson.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Thomson Reuters
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Pearson
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to Pearson's net margin of 0.00%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 14.99% beat Pearson's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thomson Reuters19.93% 14.99% 10.06%
Pearson N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Pearson had 1 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Pearson and 2 mentions for Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters' average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat Pearson's score of 0.29 indicating that Thomson Reuters is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Thomson Reuters
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Pearson
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.1% of Pearson shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pearson shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Pearson pays an annual dividend of $0.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Thomson Reuters pays out 76.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats Pearson on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to McGraw Hill?

McGraw Hill (NYSE:MH) and Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) are both manufacturing companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and valuation.

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than McGraw Hill. McGraw Hill is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
McGraw HillN/AN/AN/A$1.687.70
Thomson Reuters$7.66B4.69$1.50B$3.4423.93

McGraw Hill presently has a consensus price target of $20.38, indicating a potential upside of 57.59%. Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $144.84, indicating a potential upside of 75.95%. Given Thomson Reuters' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than McGraw Hill.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
McGraw Hill
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87
Thomson Reuters
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to McGraw Hill's net margin of 0.00%. Thomson Reuters' return on equity of 14.99% beat McGraw Hill's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
McGraw HillN/A N/A N/A
Thomson Reuters 19.93%14.99%10.06%

In the previous week, McGraw Hill had 1 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for McGraw Hill and 2 mentions for Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters' average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat McGraw Hill's score of -0.33 indicating that Thomson Reuters is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
McGraw Hill
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Thomson Reuters
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats McGraw Hill on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to John Wiley & Sons?

John Wiley & Sons (NYSE:WLY) and Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) are both printing and publishing companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

73.9% of John Wiley & Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.7% of John Wiley & Sons shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

John Wiley & Sons pays an annual dividend of $1.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. John Wiley & Sons pays out 49.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Thomson Reuters pays out 76.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. John Wiley & Sons has raised its dividend for 26 consecutive years. John Wiley & Sons is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.77, indicating that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to John Wiley & Sons' net margin of 9.24%. John Wiley & Sons' return on equity of 28.38% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
John Wiley & Sons9.24% 28.38% 8.24%
Thomson Reuters 19.93%14.99%10.06%

In the previous week, John Wiley & Sons and John Wiley & Sons both had 2 articles in the media. Thomson Reuters' average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat John Wiley & Sons' score of 0.30 indicating that Thomson Reuters is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
John Wiley & Sons
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Thomson Reuters
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
John Wiley & Sons$1.68B1.35$84.16M$2.8715.33
Thomson Reuters$7.66B4.69$1.50B$3.4423.93

Thomson Reuters has a consensus price target of $144.84, suggesting a potential upside of 75.95%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than John Wiley & Sons.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
John Wiley & Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Thomson Reuters
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats John Wiley & Sons on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Thomson Reuters compare to John Wiley & Sons?

John Wiley & Sons (NYSE:WLYB) and Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) are both printing and publishing companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and dividends.

John Wiley & Sons has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.77, indicating that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than John Wiley & Sons. John Wiley & Sons is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
John Wiley & Sons$1.67B1.33$84.16M$2.8715.08
Thomson Reuters$7.66B4.69$1.50B$3.4423.93

John Wiley & Sons pays an annual dividend of $1.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. John Wiley & Sons pays out 49.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Thomson Reuters pays out 76.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. John Wiley & Sons has raised its dividend for 26 consecutive years. John Wiley & Sons is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, John Wiley & Sons and John Wiley & Sons both had 2 articles in the media. Thomson Reuters' average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat John Wiley & Sons' score of 0.00 indicating that Thomson Reuters is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
John Wiley & Sons
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Thomson Reuters
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Thomson Reuters has a net margin of 19.93% compared to John Wiley & Sons' net margin of 9.24%. John Wiley & Sons' return on equity of 28.38% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
John Wiley & Sons9.24% 28.38% 8.24%
Thomson Reuters 19.93%14.99%10.06%

Thomson Reuters has a consensus target price of $144.84, indicating a potential upside of 75.95%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than John Wiley & Sons.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
John Wiley & Sons
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Thomson Reuters
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

0.5% of John Wiley & Sons shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.7% of John Wiley & Sons shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Thomson Reuters beats John Wiley & Sons on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Thomson Reuters News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TRI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TRI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TRI vs. The Competition

MetricThomson ReutersMisc. Publishing IndustryManufacturing SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$36.28B$19.19B$4.28B$11.95B
Dividend Yield3.05%3.05%9.68%5.58%
P/E Ratio23.9515.8221.8023.76
Price / Sales4.694.80126.75116.35
Price / Cash14.0014.0046.5137.23
Price / Book3.033.0328.986.75
Net Income$1.50B$1.50B$118.48M$337.35M
7 Day Performance-4.64%0.42%-3.43%-2.54%
1 Month Performance-11.43%-1.03%-0.07%1.42%
1 Year PerformanceN/AN/A11.95%24.71%

Thomson Reuters Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TRI
Thomson Reuters
4.173 of 5 stars
$82.32
-1.0%
$144.84
+76.0%
N/A$36.28B$7.66B23.9527,100
NWS
News
3.1469 of 5 stars
$29.82
-1.7%
N/A-2.6%$16.32B$8.45B14.8425,500
PSO
Pearson
1.455 of 5 stars
$14.84
-1.1%
N/A+3.0%$8.97B$4.72BN/A16,665
MH
McGraw Hill
4.2338 of 5 stars
$12.03
+2.5%
$20.38
+69.4%
N/A$2.30BN/A7.164,200
WLY
John Wiley & Sons
2.2945 of 5 stars
$42.19
+1.3%
N/A+15.0%$2.16B$1.68B14.705,200

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:TRI) was last updated on 6/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners