TUSK vs. NOA, GPRK, GFR, RNGR, PNRG, AMPY, KGEI, EPM, GTE, and NCSM
Should you be buying Mammoth Energy Services stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Mammoth Energy Services include North American Construction Group (NOA), Geopark (GPRK), Greenfire Resources (GFR), Ranger Energy Services (RNGR), PrimeEnergy (PNRG), Amplify Energy (AMPY), Kolibri Global Energy (KGEI), Evolution Petroleum (EPM), Gran Tierra Energy (GTE), and NCS Multistage (NCSM). These companies are all part of the "petroleum and natural gas" industry.
Mammoth Energy Services vs. Its Competitors
Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.
Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its share price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500.
79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.82% compared to Mammoth Energy Services' net margin of -18.13%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 17.15% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.
In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 1 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for North American Construction Group and 2 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Mammoth Energy Services' score of 0.64 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Summary
North American Construction Group beats Mammoth Energy Services on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Mammoth Energy Services News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TUSK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TUSK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip ChartMedia Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
Mammoth Energy Services Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (NASDAQ:TUSK) was last updated on 10/21/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff