Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Competitors

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Which has more risk and volatility, TUSK or NOA?

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its share price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its share price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in TUSK or NOA?

79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Which has higher valuation and earnings, TUSK or NOA?

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services	$187.93M	0.57	-$207.33M	-$0.65	-3.42
North American Construction Group	$850.88M	0.51	$32.17M	$0.87	17.06

Is TUSK or NOA more profitable?

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 2.82% compared to Mammoth Energy Services' net margin of -18.13%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 17.15% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services	-18.13%	-29.24%	-19.35%
North American Construction Group	2.82%	17.15%	4.16%

Do analysts prefer TUSK or NOA?

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Does the media favor TUSK or NOA?

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 1 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for North American Construction Group and 2 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Mammoth Energy Services' score of 0.64 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
North American Construction Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Mammoth Energy Services on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.