Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Competitors

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, community ranking, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, TUSK or NOA?

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services	$187.93M	0.65	-$3.16M	-$4.32	-0.59
North American Construction Group	$1.17B	0.40	$46.78M	$1.15	13.22

Which has more risk and volatility, TUSK or NOA?

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its share price is 43% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.16, indicating that its share price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Does the MarketBeat Community prefer TUSK or NOA?

North American Construction Group received 97 more outperform votes than Mammoth Energy Services when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 69.45% of users gave North American Construction Group an outperform vote while only 67.22% of users gave Mammoth Energy Services an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Mammoth Energy Services	Outperform Votes 285 67.22%	Underperform Votes 139 32.78%
North American Construction Group	Outperform Votes 382 69.45%	Underperform Votes 168 30.55%

Do analysts prefer TUSK or NOA?

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mammoth Energy Services	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.50

Does the media favor TUSK or NOA?

In the previous week, North American Construction Group had 9 more articles in the media than Mammoth Energy Services. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for North American Construction Group and 2 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat North American Construction Group's score of 0.09 indicating that Mammoth Energy Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mammoth Energy Services	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
North American Construction Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Is TUSK or NOA a better dividend stock?

Mammoth Energy Services pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.8%. North American Construction Group pays an annual dividend of $0.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Mammoth Energy Services pays out -11.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. North American Construction Group pays out 28.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Mammoth Energy Services is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Do insiders & institutionals believe in TUSK or NOA?

79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.4% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Is TUSK or NOA more profitable?

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 4.79% compared to Mammoth Energy Services' net margin of -105.49%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 26.00% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services	-105.49%	-53.85%	-35.56%
North American Construction Group	4.79%	26.00%	6.03%

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Mammoth Energy Services on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.