Mammoth Energy Services (TUSK) Competitors

Mammoth Energy Services (NASDAQ:TUSK) and North American Construction Group (NYSE:NOA) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Does the media prefer TUSK or NOA?

In the previous week, Mammoth Energy Services had 1 more articles in the media than North American Construction Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Mammoth Energy Services and 1 mentions for North American Construction Group. North American Construction Group's average media sentiment score of 1.77 beat Mammoth Energy Services' score of 1.06 indicating that North American Construction Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Mammoth Energy Services	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
North American Construction Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, TUSK or NOA?

North American Construction Group has higher revenue and earnings than Mammoth Energy Services. Mammoth Energy Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Construction Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mammoth Energy Services	$187.93M	0.70	-$207.33M	-$4.08	-0.67
North American Construction Group	$850.88M	0.59	$32.17M	$1.01	16.39

Is TUSK or NOA more profitable?

North American Construction Group has a net margin of 3.24% compared to Mammoth Energy Services' net margin of -94.61%. North American Construction Group's return on equity of 23.70% beat Mammoth Energy Services' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mammoth Energy Services	-94.61%	-73.54%	-47.33%
North American Construction Group	3.24%	23.70%	5.64%

Which has more risk and volatility, TUSK or NOA?

Mammoth Energy Services has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, North American Construction Group has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of TUSK or NOA?

79.7% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of North American Construction Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Mammoth Energy Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.7% of North American Construction Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Do analysts recommend TUSK or NOA?

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mammoth Energy Services	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
North American Construction Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.50

Summary

North American Construction Group beats Mammoth Energy Services on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.