USCB Financial (USCB) Competitors

In the previous week, Origin Bancorp's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat USCB Financial's score of 0.00 indicating that Origin Bancorp is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Origin Bancorp currently has a consensus target price of $48.50, suggesting a potential downside of 6.00%. USCB Financial has a consensus target price of $22.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.61%. Given USCB Financial's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe USCB Financial is more favorable than Origin Bancorp.

USCB Financial has a net margin of 17.04% compared to Origin Bancorp's net margin of 13.46%. USCB Financial's return on equity of 15.37% beat Origin Bancorp's return on equity.

Origin Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. USCB Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Origin Bancorp pays out 38.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. USCB Financial pays out 35.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Origin Bancorp has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and USCB Financial has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. USCB Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Origin Bancorp has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, USCB Financial has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Origin Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than USCB Financial. USCB Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Origin Bancorp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

54.7% of Origin Bancorp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.3% of USCB Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.3% of Origin Bancorp shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 49.5% of USCB Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Burke & Herbert Financial Services had 1 more articles in the media than USCB Financial. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Burke & Herbert Financial Services and 0 mentions for USCB Financial. Burke & Herbert Financial Services' average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat USCB Financial's score of 0.00 indicating that Burke & Herbert Financial Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. USCB Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Burke & Herbert Financial Services pays out 28.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. USCB Financial pays out 35.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Burke & Herbert Financial Services has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and USCB Financial has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Burke & Herbert Financial Services is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services has a net margin of 24.04% compared to USCB Financial's net margin of 17.04%. USCB Financial's return on equity of 15.37% beat Burke & Herbert Financial Services' return on equity.

61.3% of USCB Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.0% of Burke & Herbert Financial Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 49.5% of USCB Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services has higher revenue and earnings than USCB Financial. Burke & Herbert Financial Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than USCB Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, USCB Financial has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services presently has a consensus target price of $71.40, suggesting a potential upside of 2.25%. USCB Financial has a consensus target price of $22.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.61%. Given USCB Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe USCB Financial is more favorable than Burke & Herbert Financial Services.

Perella Weinberg Partners presently has a consensus target price of $22.63, indicating a potential upside of 31.31%. USCB Financial has a consensus target price of $22.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.61%. Given Perella Weinberg Partners' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Perella Weinberg Partners is more favorable than USCB Financial.

Perella Weinberg Partners has higher revenue and earnings than USCB Financial. USCB Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Perella Weinberg Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Perella Weinberg Partners had 1 more articles in the media than USCB Financial. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Perella Weinberg Partners and 0 mentions for USCB Financial. Perella Weinberg Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled USCB Financial'saverage media sentiment score.

41.1% of Perella Weinberg Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.3% of USCB Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 26.1% of Perella Weinberg Partners shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 49.5% of USCB Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Perella Weinberg Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. USCB Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Perella Weinberg Partners pays out 116.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. USCB Financial pays out 35.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. USCB Financial has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. USCB Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

USCB Financial has a net margin of 17.04% compared to Perella Weinberg Partners' net margin of 2.82%. USCB Financial's return on equity of 15.37% beat Perella Weinberg Partners' return on equity.

Perella Weinberg Partners has a beta of 1.65, indicating that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, USCB Financial has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Amalgamated Financial had 2 more articles in the media than USCB Financial. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Amalgamated Financial and 0 mentions for USCB Financial. Amalgamated Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat USCB Financial's score of 0.00 indicating that Amalgamated Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

61.3% of USCB Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.9% of Amalgamated Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 49.5% of USCB Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Amalgamated Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Amalgamated Financial has higher revenue and earnings than USCB Financial. Amalgamated Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than USCB Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Amalgamated Financial has a net margin of 22.33% compared to USCB Financial's net margin of 17.04%. USCB Financial's return on equity of 15.37% beat Amalgamated Financial's return on equity.

USCB Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Amalgamated Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. USCB Financial pays out 35.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Amalgamated Financial pays out 19.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. USCB Financial has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Amalgamated Financial has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

USCB Financial has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amalgamated Financial has a beta of 0.79, suggesting that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

USCB Financial presently has a consensus price target of $22.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.61%. Amalgamated Financial has a consensus price target of $48.00, suggesting a potential upside of 4.25%. Given USCB Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe USCB Financial is more favorable than Amalgamated Financial.