Yuanbao (YB) Competitors

Yuanbao has higher revenue and earnings than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group. Yuanbao is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Yuanbao has a net margin of 29.67% compared to Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net margin of 11.36%. Yuanbao's return on equity of 44.37% beat Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity.

In the previous week, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group had 5 more articles in the media than Yuanbao. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group and 2 mentions for Yuanbao. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Yuanbao's score of 0.37 indicating that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Yuanbao has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

94.8% of Skyward Specialty Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. 8.5% of Skyward Specialty Insurance Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Yuanbao presently has a consensus price target of $21.80, indicating a potential upside of 45.14%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $65.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.83%. Given Yuanbao's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Yuanbao is more favorable than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group.

Slide Insurance has a net margin of 38.86% compared to Yuanbao's net margin of 29.67%. Slide Insurance's return on equity of 48.38% beat Yuanbao's return on equity.

In the previous week, Slide Insurance had 3 more articles in the media than Yuanbao. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Slide Insurance and 2 mentions for Yuanbao. Slide Insurance's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Yuanbao's score of 0.37 indicating that Slide Insurance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Slide Insurance currently has a consensus target price of $24.80, suggesting a potential upside of 16.71%. Yuanbao has a consensus target price of $21.80, suggesting a potential upside of 45.14%. Given Yuanbao's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Yuanbao is more favorable than Slide Insurance.

Slide Insurance has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Yuanbao. Yuanbao is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Slide Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Fidelis Insurance currently has a consensus target price of $24.33, indicating a potential downside of 4.65%. Yuanbao has a consensus target price of $21.80, indicating a potential upside of 45.14%. Given Yuanbao's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Yuanbao is more favorable than Fidelis Insurance.

82.0% of Fidelis Insurance shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fidelis Insurance has a beta of 0.29, indicating that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yuanbao has a beta of 0.39, indicating that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Fidelis Insurance pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Yuanbao pays an annual dividend of $1.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.4%. Fidelis Insurance pays out 16.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yuanbao pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Yuanbao has a net margin of 29.67% compared to Fidelis Insurance's net margin of 15.33%. Yuanbao's return on equity of 44.37% beat Fidelis Insurance's return on equity.

In the previous week, Fidelis Insurance and Fidelis Insurance both had 2 articles in the media. Fidelis Insurance's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Yuanbao's score of 0.37 indicating that Fidelis Insurance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Fidelis Insurance has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Yuanbao. Yuanbao is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelis Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Yuanbao has a beta of 0.39, suggesting that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Yuanbao had 2 more articles in the media than Goosehead Insurance. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Yuanbao and 0 mentions for Goosehead Insurance. Goosehead Insurance's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Yuanbao's score of 0.37 indicating that Goosehead Insurance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Yuanbao has a net margin of 29.67% compared to Goosehead Insurance's net margin of 7.94%. Yuanbao's return on equity of 44.37% beat Goosehead Insurance's return on equity.

Yuanbao presently has a consensus target price of $21.80, suggesting a potential upside of 45.14%. Goosehead Insurance has a consensus target price of $65.09, suggesting a potential upside of 23.54%. Given Yuanbao's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Yuanbao is more favorable than Goosehead Insurance.

Yuanbao has higher revenue and earnings than Goosehead Insurance. Yuanbao is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goosehead Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.