Does the media prefer QSR or ARMK?

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 8 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 2 mentions for Aramark. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Aramark's score of 0.50 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Restaurant Brands International 7 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Aramark 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher earnings and valuation, ARMK or IHG?

Intercontinental Hotels Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aramark. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Aramark $18.51B 0.76 $326.39M $1.34 39.89 Intercontinental Hotels Group $5.19B 4.68 $758M N/A N/A

Does the media favor ARMK or IHG?

In the previous week, Aramark and Aramark both had 2 articles in the media. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's score of 0.28 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Aramark 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Intercontinental Hotels Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, ARMK or YUMC?

Yum China has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aramark. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Aramark $18.51B 0.76 $326.39M $1.34 39.89 Yum China $11.80B 1.27 $929M $2.61 16.41

Is ARMK or YUMC more profitable?

Yum China has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.05% beat Yum China's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Aramark 1.84% 17.05% 4.02% Yum China 7.83% 15.11% 8.67%

Does the media prefer ARMK or YUMC?

In the previous week, Yum China had 2 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Yum China and 2 mentions for Aramark. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Yum China's score of 0.36 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Aramark 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Yum China 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Is HTHT or ARMK more profitable?

H World Group has a net margin of 19.22% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. H World Group's return on equity of 39.73% beat Aramark's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets H World Group 19.22% 39.73% 7.47% Aramark 1.84% 17.05% 4.02%

Does the media refer more to HTHT or ARMK?

In the previous week, H World Group had 4 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for H World Group and 2 mentions for Aramark. H World Group's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Aramark's score of 0.50 indicating that H World Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment H World Group 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Aramark 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, CAVA or ARMK?

Aramark has higher revenue and earnings than CAVA Group. Aramark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CAVA Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio CAVA Group $1.18B 7.16 $63.74M $0.52 139.55 Aramark $18.51B 0.76 $326.39M $1.34 39.89

Is CAVA or ARMK more profitable?

CAVA Group has a net margin of 4.79% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.05% beat CAVA Group's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets CAVA Group 4.79% 7.92% 4.57% Aramark 1.84% 17.05% 4.02%

Does the media favor CAVA or ARMK?

In the previous week, CAVA Group had 5 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for CAVA Group and 2 mentions for Aramark. CAVA Group's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Aramark's score of 0.50 indicating that CAVA Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment CAVA Group 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Aramark 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Aramark (ARMK) Competitors

$53.45 +0.11 (+0.20%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$53.54 +0.09 (+0.17%)

As of 07:02 PM Eastern

Compare

ARMK vs. QSR, IHG, YUMC, HTHT, and CAVA

Should you buy Aramark stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Aramark with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Aramark include Restaurant Brands International (QSR), Intercontinental Hotels Group (IHG), Yum China (YUMC), H World Group (HTHT), and CAVA Group (CAVA). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does Aramark compare to Restaurant Brands International?

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Aramark shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus price target of $83.54, indicating a potential upside of 15.07%. Aramark has a consensus price target of $54.50, indicating a potential upside of 1.97%. Given Restaurant Brands International's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Aramark.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.62
Aramark	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85

Restaurant Brands International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aramark. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.67	$776M	$2.84	25.56
Aramark	$18.51B	0.76	$326.39M	$1.34	39.89

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 8 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 2 mentions for Aramark. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Aramark's score of 0.50 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Aramark	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 91.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Aramark pays out 35.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Aramark has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 32.80% beat Aramark's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International	9.96%	32.80%	6.67%
Aramark	1.84%	17.05%	4.02%

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Aramark on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aramark compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) and Intercontinental Hotels Group (NYSE:IHG) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and risk.

In the previous week, Aramark and Aramark both had 2 articles in the media. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's score of 0.28 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Aramark	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Intercontinental Hotels Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

15.1% of Intercontinental Hotels Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Aramark shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Aramark has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intercontinental Hotels Group has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Aramark has a net margin of 1.84% compared to Intercontinental Hotels Group's net margin of 0.00%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.05% beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Aramark	1.84%	17.05%	4.02%
Intercontinental Hotels Group	N/A	N/A	N/A

Intercontinental Hotels Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aramark.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Aramark	$18.51B	0.76	$326.39M	$1.34	39.89
Intercontinental Hotels Group	$5.19B	4.68	$758M	N/A	N/A

Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Intercontinental Hotels Group pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Aramark pays out 35.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Aramark has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Aramark presently has a consensus target price of $54.50, suggesting a potential upside of 1.97%. Intercontinental Hotels Group has a consensus target price of $154.00, suggesting a potential downside of 5.06%. Given Aramark's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Aramark is more favorable than Intercontinental Hotels Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Aramark	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
Intercontinental Hotels Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

Summary

Aramark beats Intercontinental Hotels Group on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aramark compare to Yum China?

Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) and Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

85.6% of Yum China shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Aramark shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Yum China shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Aramark currently has a consensus price target of $54.50, suggesting a potential upside of 1.97%. Yum China has a consensus price target of $59.05, suggesting a potential upside of 37.84%. Given Yum China's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Yum China is more favorable than Aramark.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Aramark	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
Yum China	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Yum China pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Aramark pays out 35.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yum China pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Aramark has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Yum China has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Yum China is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Yum China has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.05% beat Yum China's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Aramark	1.84%	17.05%	4.02%
Yum China	7.83%	15.11%	8.67%

Yum China has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aramark. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Aramark	$18.51B	0.76	$326.39M	$1.34	39.89
Yum China	$11.80B	1.27	$929M	$2.61	16.41

Aramark has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yum China has a beta of 0.09, meaning that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Yum China had 2 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Yum China and 2 mentions for Aramark. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Yum China's score of 0.36 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Aramark	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Yum China	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Yum China beats Aramark on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aramark compare to H World Group?

H World Group (NASDAQ:HTHT) and Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

46.4% of H World Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 49.4% of H World Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Aramark shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

H World Group has a beta of 0.11, meaning that its share price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

H World Group has a net margin of 19.22% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. H World Group's return on equity of 39.73% beat Aramark's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
H World Group	19.22%	39.73%	7.47%
Aramark	1.84%	17.05%	4.02%

H World Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aramark. H World Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
H World Group	$3.62B	3.82	$726M	$2.23	20.18
Aramark	$18.51B	0.76	$326.39M	$1.34	39.89

H World Group currently has a consensus price target of $61.20, suggesting a potential upside of 36.00%. Aramark has a consensus price target of $54.50, suggesting a potential upside of 1.97%. Given H World Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe H World Group is more favorable than Aramark.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
H World Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Aramark	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85

In the previous week, H World Group had 4 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for H World Group and 2 mentions for Aramark. H World Group's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Aramark's score of 0.50 indicating that H World Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
H World Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Aramark	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

H World Group pays an annual dividend of $2.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. H World Group pays out 114.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Aramark pays out 35.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Aramark has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

H World Group beats Aramark on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aramark compare to CAVA Group?

CAVA Group (NYSE:CAVA) and Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) are both restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

Aramark has higher revenue and earnings than CAVA Group. Aramark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CAVA Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CAVA Group	$1.18B	7.16	$63.74M	$0.52	139.55
Aramark	$18.51B	0.76	$326.39M	$1.34	39.89

CAVA Group has a beta of 1.7, suggesting that its share price is 70% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

CAVA Group presently has a consensus target price of $93.19, suggesting a potential upside of 28.42%. Aramark has a consensus target price of $54.50, suggesting a potential upside of 1.97%. Given CAVA Group's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe CAVA Group is more favorable than Aramark.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CAVA Group	1 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.61
Aramark	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85

CAVA Group has a net margin of 4.79% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.05% beat CAVA Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CAVA Group	4.79%	7.92%	4.57%
Aramark	1.84%	17.05%	4.02%

In the previous week, CAVA Group had 5 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for CAVA Group and 2 mentions for Aramark. CAVA Group's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Aramark's score of 0.50 indicating that CAVA Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
CAVA Group	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Aramark	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

73.2% of CAVA Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.7% of CAVA Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Aramark shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

CAVA Group beats Aramark on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Aramark News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ARMK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

ARMK vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Aramark	BUSINESS SVCS Industry	Business Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$14.03B	$5.58B	$6.70B	$23.37B
Dividend Yield	0.90%	2.28%	3.02%	4.07%
P/E Ratio	39.89	12.31	27.82	30.27
Price / Sales	0.76	1.45	407.57	22.10
Price / Cash	14.28	11.84	24.70	24.41
Price / Book	4.46	4.93	5.86	4.63
Net Income	$326.39M	$154.98M	$205.22M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	0.06%	-1.34%	0.01%	-1.64%
1 Month Performance	18.10%	20.18%	-0.32%	-0.77%
1 Year Performance	34.68%	-2.95%	33.82%	22.61%

Aramark Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
ARMK Aramark	3.5087 of 5 stars	$53.45 +0.2%	$54.50 +2.0%	+32.4%	$14.03B	$18.51B	39.89	278,390	Analyst Forecast
QSR Restaurant Brands International	4.5547 of 5 stars	$75.36 0.0%	$83.33 +10.6%	+0.2%	$26.18B	$9.43B	26.53	53,500	Positive News
IHG Intercontinental Hotels Group	2.0716 of 5 stars	$153.04 0.0%	$154.00 +0.6%	+38.6%	$22.96B	$5.19B	N/A	13,049
YUMC Yum China	4.6122 of 5 stars	$44.51 -0.1%	$59.05 +32.7%	-0.1%	$15.56B	$11.80B	17.05	290,000
HTHT H World Group	4.8217 of 5 stars	$44.79 flat	$61.20 +36.6%	+26.5%	$13.77B	$3.62B	20.09	26,458	Short Interest Decrease

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:ARMK) was last updated on 6/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Aramark (ARMK) Competitors

ARMK vs. QSR, IHG, YUMC, HTHT, and CAVA

How does Aramark compare to Restaurant Brands International?

Summary

How does Aramark compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

Summary

How does Aramark compare to Yum China?

Summary

How does Aramark compare to H World Group?

Summary

How does Aramark compare to CAVA Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ARMK vs. The Competition

Aramark Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Aramark (ARMK) Competitors

ARMK vs. QSR, IHG, YUMC, HTHT, and CAVA

How does Aramark compare to Restaurant Brands International?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in QSR or ARMK?

Do analysts recommend QSR or ARMK?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, QSR or ARMK?

Does the media prefer QSR or ARMK?

Is QSR or ARMK a better dividend stock?

Is QSR or ARMK more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, QSR or ARMK?

Summary

How does Aramark compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

Does the media favor ARMK or IHG?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in ARMK or IHG?

Which has more volatility and risk, ARMK or IHG?

Is ARMK or IHG more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, ARMK or IHG?

Is ARMK or IHG a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend ARMK or IHG?

Summary

How does Aramark compare to Yum China?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in ARMK or YUMC?

Do analysts rate ARMK or YUMC?

Is ARMK or YUMC a better dividend stock?

Is ARMK or YUMC more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, ARMK or YUMC?

Which has more volatility and risk, ARMK or YUMC?

Does the media prefer ARMK or YUMC?

Summary

How does Aramark compare to H World Group?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of HTHT or ARMK?

Which has more risk and volatility, HTHT or ARMK?

Is HTHT or ARMK more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, HTHT or ARMK?

Do analysts prefer HTHT or ARMK?

Does the media refer more to HTHT or ARMK?

Is HTHT or ARMK a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Aramark compare to CAVA Group?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, CAVA or ARMK?

Which has more volatility & risk, CAVA or ARMK?

Do analysts recommend CAVA or ARMK?

Is CAVA or ARMK more profitable?

Does the media favor CAVA or ARMK?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of CAVA or ARMK?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ARMK vs. The Competition

Aramark Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools