Does the media refer more to QSR or YUMC?

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 6 more articles in the media than Yum China. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 4 mentions for Yum China. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Yum China's score of 0.36 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Restaurant Brands International 7 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Yum China 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, IHG or YUMC?

Yum China has higher revenue and earnings than Intercontinental Hotels Group. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Intercontinental Hotels Group $5.19B 4.68 $758M N/A N/A Yum China $11.80B 1.27 $929M $2.61 16.41

Does the media favor IHG or YUMC?

In the previous week, Yum China had 2 more articles in the media than Intercontinental Hotels Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Yum China and 2 mentions for Intercontinental Hotels Group. Yum China's average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's score of 0.28 indicating that Yum China is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Intercontinental Hotels Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Yum China 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings & valuation, ARMK or YUMC?

Yum China has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aramark. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Aramark $18.51B 0.76 $326.39M $1.34 39.89 Yum China $11.80B 1.27 $929M $2.61 16.41

Is ARMK or YUMC more profitable?

Yum China has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.05% beat Yum China's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Aramark 1.84% 17.05% 4.02% Yum China 7.83% 15.11% 8.67%

Does the media favor ARMK or YUMC?

In the previous week, Yum China had 2 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Yum China and 2 mentions for Aramark. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Yum China's score of 0.36 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Aramark 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Yum China 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, HTHT or YUMC?

Yum China has higher revenue and earnings than H World Group. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than H World Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio H World Group $3.62B 3.82 $726M $2.23 20.18 Yum China $11.80B 1.27 $929M $2.61 16.41

Is HTHT or YUMC more profitable?

H World Group has a net margin of 19.22% compared to Yum China's net margin of 7.83%. H World Group's return on equity of 39.73% beat Yum China's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets H World Group 19.22% 39.73% 7.47% Yum China 7.83% 15.11% 8.67%

Does the media prefer HTHT or YUMC?

In the previous week, H World Group had 2 more articles in the media than Yum China. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for H World Group and 4 mentions for Yum China. H World Group's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Yum China's score of 0.36 indicating that H World Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment H World Group 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Yum China 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings & valuation, BROS or YUMC?

Yum China has higher revenue and earnings than Dutch Bros. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dutch Bros, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Dutch Bros $1.64B 5.91 $79.84M $0.64 86.65 Yum China $11.80B 1.27 $929M $2.61 16.41

Is BROS or YUMC more profitable?

Yum China has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Dutch Bros' net margin of 4.61%. Yum China's return on equity of 15.11% beat Dutch Bros' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Dutch Bros 4.61% 9.42% 2.80% Yum China 7.83% 15.11% 8.67%

Does the media prefer BROS or YUMC?

In the previous week, Dutch Bros had 21 more articles in the media than Yum China. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Dutch Bros and 4 mentions for Yum China. Dutch Bros' average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat Yum China's score of 0.36 indicating that Dutch Bros is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Dutch Bros 10 Very Positive mention(s) 10 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Yum China 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Yum China (YUMC) Competitors

$42.84 -0.01 (-0.03%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$42.66 -0.18 (-0.41%)

As of 07:55 PM Eastern

Compare

YUMC vs. QSR, IHG, ARMK, HTHT, and BROS

Should you buy Yum China stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Yum China with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Yum China include Restaurant Brands International (QSR), Intercontinental Hotels Group (IHG), Aramark (ARMK), H World Group (HTHT), and Dutch Bros (BROS). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does Yum China compare to Restaurant Brands International?

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.6% of Yum China shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Yum China shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Yum China's net margin of 7.83%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 32.80% beat Yum China's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International	9.96%	32.80%	6.67%
Yum China	7.83%	15.11%	8.67%

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yum China has a beta of 0.09, suggesting that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 6 more articles in the media than Yum China. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 4 mentions for Yum China. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Yum China's score of 0.36 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Yum China	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Yum China pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 91.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Yum China pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Yum China has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus target price of $83.54, suggesting a potential upside of 15.07%. Yum China has a consensus target price of $59.05, suggesting a potential upside of 37.84%. Given Yum China's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Yum China is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.62
Yum China	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Yum China has higher revenue and earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.67	$776M	$2.84	25.56
Yum China	$11.80B	1.27	$929M	$2.61	16.41

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Yum China on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Yum China compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

Intercontinental Hotels Group (NYSE:IHG) and Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Yum China had 2 more articles in the media than Intercontinental Hotels Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Yum China and 2 mentions for Intercontinental Hotels Group. Yum China's average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's score of 0.28 indicating that Yum China is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Intercontinental Hotels Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Yum China	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Yum China has higher revenue and earnings than Intercontinental Hotels Group.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Intercontinental Hotels Group	$5.19B	4.68	$758M	N/A	N/A
Yum China	$11.80B	1.27	$929M	$2.61	16.41

Intercontinental Hotels Group has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yum China has a beta of 0.09, suggesting that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

15.1% of Intercontinental Hotels Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.6% of Yum China shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Yum China shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Yum China has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Intercontinental Hotels Group's net margin of 0.00%. Yum China's return on equity of 15.11% beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Intercontinental Hotels Group	N/A	N/A	N/A
Yum China	7.83%	15.11%	8.67%

Intercontinental Hotels Group currently has a consensus price target of $154.00, suggesting a potential downside of 5.06%. Yum China has a consensus price target of $59.05, suggesting a potential upside of 37.84%. Given Yum China's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Yum China is more favorable than Intercontinental Hotels Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Intercontinental Hotels Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Yum China	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Intercontinental Hotels Group pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Yum China pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Yum China pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yum China has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Yum China is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Yum China beats Intercontinental Hotels Group on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Yum China compare to Aramark?

Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) and Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and risk.

Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Yum China pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Aramark pays out 35.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yum China pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Aramark has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Yum China has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Yum China is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Aramark has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yum China has a beta of 0.09, suggesting that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

Yum China has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.05% beat Yum China's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Aramark	1.84%	17.05%	4.02%
Yum China	7.83%	15.11%	8.67%

Aramark presently has a consensus target price of $54.50, suggesting a potential upside of 1.97%. Yum China has a consensus target price of $59.05, suggesting a potential upside of 37.84%. Given Yum China's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Yum China is more favorable than Aramark.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Aramark	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
Yum China	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

In the previous week, Yum China had 2 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Yum China and 2 mentions for Aramark. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Yum China's score of 0.36 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Aramark	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Yum China	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Yum China has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aramark. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Aramark	$18.51B	0.76	$326.39M	$1.34	39.89
Yum China	$11.80B	1.27	$929M	$2.61	16.41

85.6% of Yum China shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Aramark shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Yum China shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Yum China beats Aramark on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Yum China compare to H World Group?

H World Group (NASDAQ:HTHT) and Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

H World Group has a net margin of 19.22% compared to Yum China's net margin of 7.83%. H World Group's return on equity of 39.73% beat Yum China's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
H World Group	19.22%	39.73%	7.47%
Yum China	7.83%	15.11%	8.67%

46.4% of H World Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.6% of Yum China shares are owned by institutional investors. 49.4% of H World Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Yum China shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

H World Group pays an annual dividend of $2.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Yum China pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. H World Group pays out 114.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Yum China pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yum China has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

H World Group has a beta of 0.11, suggesting that its share price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yum China has a beta of 0.09, suggesting that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, H World Group had 2 more articles in the media than Yum China. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for H World Group and 4 mentions for Yum China. H World Group's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Yum China's score of 0.36 indicating that H World Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
H World Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Yum China	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Yum China has higher revenue and earnings than H World Group. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than H World Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
H World Group	$3.62B	3.82	$726M	$2.23	20.18
Yum China	$11.80B	1.27	$929M	$2.61	16.41

H World Group currently has a consensus target price of $61.20, suggesting a potential upside of 36.00%. Yum China has a consensus target price of $59.05, suggesting a potential upside of 37.84%. Given Yum China's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Yum China is more favorable than H World Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
H World Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Yum China	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Summary

H World Group beats Yum China on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Yum China compare to Dutch Bros?

Dutch Bros (NYSE:BROS) and Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Dutch Bros presently has a consensus price target of $76.00, suggesting a potential upside of 37.05%. Yum China has a consensus price target of $59.05, suggesting a potential upside of 37.84%. Given Yum China's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Yum China is more favorable than Dutch Bros.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Dutch Bros	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
Yum China	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Dutch Bros has a beta of 2.36, indicating that its stock price is 136% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yum China has a beta of 0.09, indicating that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

Yum China has higher revenue and earnings than Dutch Bros. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dutch Bros, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Dutch Bros	$1.64B	5.91	$79.84M	$0.64	86.65
Yum China	$11.80B	1.27	$929M	$2.61	16.41

Yum China has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Dutch Bros' net margin of 4.61%. Yum China's return on equity of 15.11% beat Dutch Bros' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Dutch Bros	4.61%	9.42%	2.80%
Yum China	7.83%	15.11%	8.67%

In the previous week, Dutch Bros had 21 more articles in the media than Yum China. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Dutch Bros and 4 mentions for Yum China. Dutch Bros' average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat Yum China's score of 0.36 indicating that Dutch Bros is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Dutch Bros	10 Very Positive mention(s)	10 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Yum China	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

85.5% of Dutch Bros shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.6% of Yum China shares are owned by institutional investors. 38.9% of Dutch Bros shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Yum China shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Dutch Bros beats Yum China on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Yum China News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding YUMC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

YUMC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Yum China	RETAIL Industry	Retail Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$14.96B	$10.77B	$26.73B	$23.01B
Dividend Yield	2.71%	2.80%	178.39%	4.08%
P/E Ratio	16.41	24.97	19.06	30.18
Price / Sales	1.27	1.55	2.18	144.30
Price / Cash	11.25	14.34	14.52	24.44
Price / Book	2.54	4.48	6.11	4.63
Net Income	$929M	$392.93M	$969.96M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	0.77%	-4.88%	-3.03%	-1.64%
1 Month Performance	-11.49%	-3.36%	-1.82%	-0.77%
1 Year Performance	-0.32%	-14.90%	-2.09%	22.61%

Yum China Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
YUMC Yum China	4.6122 of 5 stars	$42.84 0.0%	$59.05 +37.8%	-0.1%	$14.96B	$11.80B	16.41	290,000
QSR Restaurant Brands International	4.5547 of 5 stars	$72.87 -2.4%	$83.54 +14.6%	+0.2%	$25.95B	$9.59B	25.66	53,500	Positive News
IHG Intercontinental Hotels Group	2.0126 of 5 stars	$154.96 +0.1%	$154.00 -0.6%	+38.6%	$23.17B	$5.19B	N/A	13,049
ARMK Aramark	3.5087 of 5 stars	$54.30 +1.7%	$54.25 -0.1%	+32.4%	$14.04B	$18.51B	40.52	278,390	Analyst Forecast
HTHT H World Group	4.896 of 5 stars	$44.37 -1.2%	$61.20 +37.9%	+26.5%	$13.80B	$3.62B	19.90	26,458	Short Interest Decrease High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:YUMC) was last updated on 6/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Yum China (YUMC) Competitors

YUMC vs. QSR, IHG, ARMK, HTHT, and BROS

How does Yum China compare to Restaurant Brands International?

Summary

How does Yum China compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

Summary

How does Yum China compare to Aramark?

Summary

How does Yum China compare to H World Group?

Summary

How does Yum China compare to Dutch Bros?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

YUMC vs. The Competition

Yum China Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Yum China (YUMC) Competitors

YUMC vs. QSR, IHG, ARMK, HTHT, and BROS

How does Yum China compare to Restaurant Brands International?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in QSR or YUMC?

Is QSR or YUMC more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, QSR or YUMC?

Does the media refer more to QSR or YUMC?

Is QSR or YUMC a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate QSR or YUMC?

Which has better valuation & earnings, QSR or YUMC?

Summary

How does Yum China compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

Does the media favor IHG or YUMC?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, IHG or YUMC?

Which has more volatility & risk, IHG or YUMC?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in IHG or YUMC?

Is IHG or YUMC more profitable?

Do analysts prefer IHG or YUMC?

Is IHG or YUMC a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Yum China compare to Aramark?

Is ARMK or YUMC a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, ARMK or YUMC?

Is ARMK or YUMC more profitable?

Do analysts prefer ARMK or YUMC?

Does the media favor ARMK or YUMC?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, ARMK or YUMC?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in ARMK or YUMC?

Summary

How does Yum China compare to H World Group?

Is HTHT or YUMC more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in HTHT or YUMC?

Is HTHT or YUMC a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, HTHT or YUMC?

Does the media prefer HTHT or YUMC?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, HTHT or YUMC?

Do analysts rate HTHT or YUMC?

Summary

How does Yum China compare to Dutch Bros?

Do analysts rate BROS or YUMC?

Which has more volatility and risk, BROS or YUMC?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, BROS or YUMC?

Is BROS or YUMC more profitable?

Does the media prefer BROS or YUMC?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in BROS or YUMC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

YUMC vs. The Competition

Yum China Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools