S&P 500   3,894.16 (-0.20%)
DOW   31,526.77 (-0.03%)
QQQ   322.67 (-0.28%)
AAPL   126.85 (-0.74%)
MSFT   235.40 (-0.65%)
FB   265.53 (+0.23%)
GOOGL   2,070.23 (+0.03%)
TSLA   709.91 (-1.19%)
AMZN   3,147.00 (+0.03%)
NVDA   549.82 (-0.70%)
BABA   240.05 (-0.68%)
CGC   35.08 (+1.01%)
GE   13.04 (-0.53%)
MU   94.28 (-0.51%)
NIO   45.94 (-7.68%)
AMD   86.06 (-0.38%)
T   28.29 (+0.71%)
F   11.99 (+0.08%)
ACB   11.48 (+3.99%)
DIS   197.65 (+1.37%)
BA   223.07 (-0.59%)
NFLX   550.62 (+0.00%)
BAC   35.83 (+0.11%)
S&P 500   3,894.16 (-0.20%)
DOW   31,526.77 (-0.03%)
QQQ   322.67 (-0.28%)
AAPL   126.85 (-0.74%)
MSFT   235.40 (-0.65%)
FB   265.53 (+0.23%)
GOOGL   2,070.23 (+0.03%)
TSLA   709.91 (-1.19%)
AMZN   3,147.00 (+0.03%)
NVDA   549.82 (-0.70%)
BABA   240.05 (-0.68%)
CGC   35.08 (+1.01%)
GE   13.04 (-0.53%)
MU   94.28 (-0.51%)
NIO   45.94 (-7.68%)
AMD   86.06 (-0.38%)
T   28.29 (+0.71%)
F   11.99 (+0.08%)
ACB   11.48 (+3.99%)
DIS   197.65 (+1.37%)
BA   223.07 (-0.59%)
NFLX   550.62 (+0.00%)
BAC   35.83 (+0.11%)
S&P 500   3,894.16 (-0.20%)
DOW   31,526.77 (-0.03%)
QQQ   322.67 (-0.28%)
AAPL   126.85 (-0.74%)
MSFT   235.40 (-0.65%)
FB   265.53 (+0.23%)
GOOGL   2,070.23 (+0.03%)
TSLA   709.91 (-1.19%)
AMZN   3,147.00 (+0.03%)
NVDA   549.82 (-0.70%)
BABA   240.05 (-0.68%)
CGC   35.08 (+1.01%)
GE   13.04 (-0.53%)
MU   94.28 (-0.51%)
NIO   45.94 (-7.68%)
AMD   86.06 (-0.38%)
T   28.29 (+0.71%)
F   11.99 (+0.08%)
ACB   11.48 (+3.99%)
DIS   197.65 (+1.37%)
BA   223.07 (-0.59%)
NFLX   550.62 (+0.00%)
BAC   35.83 (+0.11%)
S&P 500   3,894.16 (-0.20%)
DOW   31,526.77 (-0.03%)
QQQ   322.67 (-0.28%)
AAPL   126.85 (-0.74%)
MSFT   235.40 (-0.65%)
FB   265.53 (+0.23%)
GOOGL   2,070.23 (+0.03%)
TSLA   709.91 (-1.19%)
AMZN   3,147.00 (+0.03%)
NVDA   549.82 (-0.70%)
BABA   240.05 (-0.68%)
CGC   35.08 (+1.01%)
GE   13.04 (-0.53%)
MU   94.28 (-0.51%)
NIO   45.94 (-7.68%)
AMD   86.06 (-0.38%)
T   28.29 (+0.71%)
F   11.99 (+0.08%)
ACB   11.48 (+3.99%)
DIS   197.65 (+1.37%)
BA   223.07 (-0.59%)
NFLX   550.62 (+0.00%)
BAC   35.83 (+0.11%)
Log in
NYSE:YUMC

Yum China Competitors

$59.42
-0.42 (-0.70 %)
(As of 03/2/2021 09:39 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$59.16
Now: $59.42
$59.72
50-Day Range
$55.98
MA: $59.50
$64.35
52-Week Range
$38.33
Now: $59.42
$64.64
Volume3,540 shs
Average Volume2.10 million shs
Market Capitalization$24.92 billion
P/E Ratio45.36
Dividend Yield0.40%
Beta0.87

Competitors

Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) Vs. CMG, YUM, QSR, DRI, ARMK, and TXRH

Should you be buying YUMC stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "eating places" are considered alternatives and competitors to Yum China, including Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG), Yum! Brands (YUM), Restaurant Brands International (QSR), Darden Restaurants (DRI), Aramark (ARMK), and Texas Roadhouse (TXRH).

Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) and Chipotle Mexican Grill (NYSE:CMG) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Yum China and Chipotle Mexican Grill's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Yum China6.33%16.35%7.65%
Chipotle Mexican Grill4.08%16.70%5.38%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Yum China and Chipotle Mexican Grill, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Yum China02612.89
Chipotle Mexican Grill0131902.59

Yum China presently has a consensus price target of $57.6750, suggesting a potential downside of 3.62%. Chipotle Mexican Grill has a consensus price target of $1,526.9655, suggesting a potential upside of 2.83%. Given Chipotle Mexican Grill's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Chipotle Mexican Grill is more favorable than Yum China.

Risk & Volatility

Yum China has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chipotle Mexican Grill has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Yum China and Chipotle Mexican Grill's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Yum China$8.78 billion2.84$713 million$1.8831.61
Chipotle Mexican Grill$5.59 billion7.48$350.16 million$14.05105.69

Yum China has higher revenue and earnings than Chipotle Mexican Grill. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chipotle Mexican Grill, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

81.6% of Yum China shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Yum China shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Chipotle Mexican Grill beats Yum China on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) and Yum! Brands (NYSE:YUM) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Yum China and Yum! Brands' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Yum China$8.78 billion2.84$713 million$1.8831.61
Yum! Brands$5.60 billion5.60$1.29 billion$3.5529.44

Yum! Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Yum China. Yum! Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yum China, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Yum China and Yum! Brands, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Yum China02612.89
Yum! Brands110602.29

Yum China presently has a consensus price target of $57.6750, suggesting a potential downside of 3.62%. Yum! Brands has a consensus price target of $104.00, suggesting a potential downside of 0.49%. Given Yum! Brands' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Yum! Brands is more favorable than Yum China.

Dividends

Yum China pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Yum! Brands pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Yum China pays out 12.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yum! Brands pays out 56.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Yum China has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Yum! Brands has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Yum China and Yum! Brands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Yum China6.33%16.35%7.65%
Yum! Brands18.78%-12.42%17.73%

Risk and Volatility

Yum China has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Yum! Brands has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

81.6% of Yum China shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.2% of Yum! Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Yum China shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Yum! Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Yum! Brands beats Yum China on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Restaurant Brands International and Yum China, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Restaurant Brands International161802.68
Yum China02612.89

Restaurant Brands International presently has a consensus target price of $65.1818, suggesting a potential upside of 4.98%. Yum China has a consensus target price of $57.6750, suggesting a potential downside of 3.62%. Given Restaurant Brands International's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Yum China.

Profitability

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Yum China's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Restaurant Brands International11.00%26.67%4.70%
Yum China6.33%16.35%7.65%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Yum China's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International$5.60 billion3.36$643 million$2.7222.68
Yum China$8.78 billion2.84$713 million$1.8831.61

Yum China has higher revenue and earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yum China, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Yum China has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Yum China pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 76.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Yum China pays out 12.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Yum China has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

79.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.6% of Yum China shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Yum China shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Yum China on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) and Darden Restaurants (NYSE:DRI) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Yum China and Darden Restaurants' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Yum China$8.78 billion2.84$713 million$1.8831.61
Darden Restaurants$7.81 billion2.32$-52,400,000.00$3.1344.43

Yum China has higher revenue and earnings than Darden Restaurants. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Darden Restaurants, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Yum China pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Darden Restaurants pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Yum China pays out 12.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Darden Restaurants pays out 47.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Yum China has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Yum China and Darden Restaurants' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Yum China6.33%16.35%7.65%
Darden Restaurants-1.70%10.47%2.51%

Risk & Volatility

Yum China has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

81.6% of Yum China shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.4% of Darden Restaurants shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Yum China shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Darden Restaurants shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Yum China and Darden Restaurants, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Yum China02612.89
Darden Restaurants0102002.67

Yum China currently has a consensus target price of $57.6750, suggesting a potential downside of 3.62%. Darden Restaurants has a consensus target price of $114.1833, suggesting a potential downside of 17.87%. Given Yum China's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Yum China is more favorable than Darden Restaurants.

Summary

Yum China beats Darden Restaurants on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) and Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Yum China and Aramark's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Yum China$8.78 billion2.84$713 million$1.8831.61
Aramark$12.83 billion0.76$-461,530,000.00($0.17)-226.29

Yum China has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aramark. Aramark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yum China, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Yum China pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Yum China pays out 12.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Aramark pays out -258.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Yum China has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Aramark has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Aramark is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Yum China and Aramark's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Yum China6.33%16.35%7.65%
Aramark-3.60%-1.48%-0.30%

Risk and Volatility

Yum China has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its share price is 13% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.88, suggesting that its share price is 88% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

81.6% of Yum China shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.5% of Aramark shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Yum China shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.3% of Aramark shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Yum China and Aramark, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Yum China02612.89
Aramark09402.31

Yum China presently has a consensus price target of $57.6750, suggesting a potential downside of 3.62%. Aramark has a consensus price target of $31.4167, suggesting a potential downside of 18.61%. Given Yum China's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Yum China is more favorable than Aramark.

Summary

Yum China beats Aramark on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) and Texas Roadhouse (NASDAQ:TXRH) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and risk.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Yum China and Texas Roadhouse's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Yum China$8.78 billion2.84$713 million$1.8831.61
Texas Roadhouse$2.76 billion2.30$174.45 million$2.4637.13

Yum China has higher revenue and earnings than Texas Roadhouse. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Roadhouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Yum China and Texas Roadhouse's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Yum China6.33%16.35%7.65%
Texas Roadhouse2.19%5.97%2.60%

Risk & Volatility

Yum China has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

81.6% of Yum China shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.7% of Texas Roadhouse shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Yum China shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.2% of Texas Roadhouse shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Yum China and Texas Roadhouse, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Yum China02612.89
Texas Roadhouse116712.32

Yum China presently has a consensus price target of $57.6750, suggesting a potential downside of 3.62%. Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $75.75, suggesting a potential downside of 17.48%. Given Yum China's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Yum China is more favorable than Texas Roadhouse.

Summary

Yum China beats Texas Roadhouse on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Yum China Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Chipotle Mexican Grill logo
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill
1.6$1,484.95-2.9%$41.79 billion$5.59 billion177.63
Yum! Brands logo
YUM
Yum! Brands
2.4$104.51-0.0%$31.36 billion$5.60 billion31.38
Restaurant Brands International logo
QSR
Restaurant Brands International
2.1$61.70-0.5%$18.73 billion$5.60 billion33.53Gap Down
Darden Restaurants logo
DRI
Darden Restaurants
2.0$139.07-0.0%$18.12 billion$7.81 billion-144.86
Aramark logo
ARMK
Aramark
1.4$38.47-0.3%$9.80 billion$12.83 billion-21.02Gap Down
Texas Roadhouse logo
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse
1.5$91.33-0.5%$6.38 billion$2.76 billion117.09Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Wingstop logo
WING
Wingstop
1.7$138.73-1.1%$4.16 billion$199.68 million144.51
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store logo
CBRL
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store
1.3$159.95-0.4%$3.78 billion$2.52 billion40.29Gap Down
Brinker International logo
EAT
Brinker International
1.6$72.10-0.4%$3.29 billion$3.08 billion126.49Gap Down
Papa John's International logo
PZZA
Papa John's International
1.5$93.79-3.8%$3.09 billion$1.62 billion117.24Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
The Cheesecake Factory logo
CAKE
The Cheesecake Factory
1.3$55.85-0.7%$2.53 billion$2.48 billion-41.07Decrease in Short Interest
Main Street Capital logo
MAIN
Main Street Capital
1.2$36.43-0.2%$2.41 billion$243.37 million-63.91Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Jack in the Box logo
JACK
Jack in the Box
1.9$102.36-2.4%$2.39 billion$1.02 billion26.31
Bloomin' Brands logo
BLMN
Bloomin' Brands
1.8$25.82-0.3%$2.28 billion$4.14 billion-18.85Analyst Upgrade
Gap Down
Dave & Buster's Entertainment logo
PLAY
Dave & Buster's Entertainment
1.5$41.89-0.7%$1.98 billion$1.35 billion-14.85Gap Down
Dine Brands Global logo
DIN
Dine Brands Global
1.5$78.02-4.4%$1.34 billion$910.18 million-17.19
BJ's Restaurants logo
BJRI
BJ's Restaurants
1.3$58.21-4.6%$1.30 billion$1.16 billion-50.62Gap Down
Denny's logo
DENN
Denny's
1.4$17.87-1.8%$1.14 billion$541.39 million111.69Gap Down
Arcos Dorados logo
ARCO
Arcos Dorados
1.4$5.33-3.0%$1.14 billion$2.96 billion-7.85Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Chuy's logo
CHUY
Chuy's
1.3$42.49-3.5%$836.84 million$426.36 million-96.57Upcoming Earnings
Ruth's Hospitality Group logo
RUTH
Ruth's Hospitality Group
1.2$22.94-0.1%$799.56 million$468.03 million-62.00Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
El Pollo Loco logo
LOCO
El Pollo Loco
1.6$19.02-0.4%$695.77 million$442.33 million29.72
RCI Hospitality logo
RICK
RCI Hospitality
1.5$66.07-4.9%$623.97 million$132.33 million-97.16Dividend Announcement
Decrease in Short Interest
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers logo
RRGB
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers
1.2$30.67-0.1%$476.67 million$1.32 billion-1.65Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
Noodles & Company logo
NDLS
Noodles & Company
1.1$10.25-0.0%$454.81 million$462.41 million-22.28Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
Fiesta Restaurant Group logo
FRGI
Fiesta Restaurant Group
0.9$15.86-3.8%$411.11 million$660.94 million-12.59Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
Del Taco Restaurants logo
TACO
Del Taco Restaurants
2.4$10.80-7.0%$403.11 million$512.95 million-1.89Upcoming Earnings
High Trading Volume
Carrols Restaurant Group logo
TAST
Carrols Restaurant Group
1.3$6.39-3.3%$332.87 million$1.46 billion-14.20Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Gap Down
Biglari logo
BH
Biglari
0.9$139.50-16.0%$317.50 million$668.84 million-0.78Upcoming Earnings
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Down
LiveXLive Media logo
LIVX
LiveXLive Media
1.7$4.17-1.0%$311.73 million$38.66 million-7.19Decrease in Short Interest
Kura Sushi USA logo
KRUS
Kura Sushi USA
1.0$32.86-9.0%$275.10 million$45.17 million-12.17High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Nathan's Famous logo
NATH
Nathan's Famous
1.0$60.70-1.5%$249.78 million$103.32 million20.86Gap Down
The ONE Group Hospitality logo
STKS
The ONE Group Hospitality
1.0$5.33-7.9%$154.93 million$120.68 million14.41
J. Alexander's logo
JAX
J. Alexander's
0.7$9.04-3.2%$135.71 million$247.27 million-5.45
Potbelly logo
PBPB
Potbelly
0.8$5.22-1.1%$127.84 million$409.71 million-2.47
BFI
BurgerFi International
0.0$15.26-0.3%$120.30 millionN/A-89.76Increase in Short Interest
FAT Brands logo
FAT
FAT Brands
0.9$10.08-15.3%$120.15 million$22.50 million-14.60Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Luby's logo
LUB
Luby's
0.7$3.25-1.8%$99.91 million$214.02 million-3.32Decrease in Short Interest
ARKR
Ark Restaurants
0.7$18.98-4.6%$66.85 million$106.49 million-14.16
BBQ
BBQ
0.6$6.00-2.5%$55.70 million$82.27 million9.23Decrease in Short Interest
Good Times Restaurants logo
GTIM
Good Times Restaurants
1.0$3.59-3.6%$45.45 million$109.86 million-3.23Gap Down
This page was last updated on 3/2/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.