Does the media prefer YUMC or CMG?

In the previous week, Chipotle Mexican Grill had 40 more articles in the media than Yum China. MarketBeat recorded 58 mentions for Chipotle Mexican Grill and 18 mentions for Yum China. Yum China's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Chipotle Mexican Grill's score of 1.17 indicating that Yum China is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Yum China 16 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Chipotle Mexican Grill 45 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher earnings and valuation, YUMC or YUM?

Yum! Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Yum China. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yum! Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Yum China $11.80B 1.37 $929M $2.73 17.28 Yum! Brands $8.21B 5.14 $1.56B $7.95 19.46

Is YUMC or YUM more profitable?

Yum! Brands has a net margin of 25.42% compared to Yum China's net margin of 7.84%. Yum China's return on equity of 15.82% beat Yum! Brands' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Yum China 7.84% 15.82% 8.96% Yum! Brands 25.42% -24.57% 22.24%

Does the media refer more to YUMC or YUM?

In the previous week, Yum! Brands had 38 more articles in the media than Yum China. MarketBeat recorded 56 mentions for Yum! Brands and 18 mentions for Yum China. Yum China's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Yum! Brands' score of 1.23 indicating that Yum China is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Yum China 16 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Yum! Brands 41 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 10 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor YUMC or QSR?

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 11 more articles in the media than Yum China. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 18 mentions for Yum China. Yum China's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of 0.59 indicating that Yum China is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Yum China 16 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Restaurant Brands International 8 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor YUMC or DRI?

In the previous week, Darden Restaurants had 18 more articles in the media than Yum China. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for Darden Restaurants and 18 mentions for Yum China. Darden Restaurants' average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Yum China's score of 1.35 indicating that Darden Restaurants is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Yum China 16 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Darden Restaurants 29 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings and valuation, ARMK or YUMC?

Yum China has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aramark. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Aramark $18.51B 0.85 $326.39M $1.43 41.64 Yum China $11.80B 1.37 $929M $2.73 17.28

Is ARMK or YUMC more profitable?

Yum China has a net margin of 7.84% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.93%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.68% beat Yum China's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Aramark 1.93% 17.68% 4.21% Yum China 7.84% 15.82% 8.96%

Does the media refer more to ARMK or YUMC?

In the previous week, Aramark and Aramark both had 18 articles in the media. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Yum China's score of 1.35 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Aramark 16 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Yum China 16 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Yum China (YUMC) Competitors

$47.17 -1.40 (-2.88%)

As of 03:58 PM Eastern

Compare

YUMC vs. CMG, YUM, QSR, DRI, and ARMK

Should you buy Yum China stock or one of its competitors? Yum China's main competitors and comparable companies include Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG), Yum! Brands (YUM), Restaurant Brands International (QSR), Darden Restaurants (DRI), and Aramark (ARMK). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "restaurants" industry.

How does Yum China compare to Chipotle Mexican Grill?

Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) and Chipotle Mexican Grill (NYSE:CMG) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

Chipotle Mexican Grill has a net margin of 11.43% compared to Yum China's net margin of 7.84%. Chipotle Mexican Grill's return on equity of 54.65% beat Yum China's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Yum China	7.84%	15.82%	8.96%
Chipotle Mexican Grill	11.43%	54.65%	16.21%

Chipotle Mexican Grill has higher revenue and earnings than Yum China. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chipotle Mexican Grill, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Yum China	$11.80B	1.37	$929M	$2.73	17.28
Chipotle Mexican Grill	$11.93B	3.96	$1.54B	$1.09	34.21

Yum China presently has a consensus target price of $59.21, indicating a potential upside of 25.53%. Chipotle Mexican Grill has a consensus target price of $43.84, indicating a potential upside of 17.56%. Given Yum China's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Yum China is more favorable than Chipotle Mexican Grill.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Yum China	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Chipotle Mexican Grill	0 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	23 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70

85.6% of Yum China shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.3% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Yum China shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Chipotle Mexican Grill had 40 more articles in the media than Yum China. MarketBeat recorded 58 mentions for Chipotle Mexican Grill and 18 mentions for Yum China. Yum China's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Chipotle Mexican Grill's score of 1.17 indicating that Yum China is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Yum China	16 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Chipotle Mexican Grill	45 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Yum China has a beta of 0.09, suggesting that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chipotle Mexican Grill has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chipotle Mexican Grill beats Yum China on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Yum China compare to Yum! Brands?

Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) and Yum! Brands (NYSE:YUM) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Yum! Brands had 38 more articles in the media than Yum China. MarketBeat recorded 56 mentions for Yum! Brands and 18 mentions for Yum China. Yum China's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Yum! Brands' score of 1.23 indicating that Yum China is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Yum China	16 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Yum! Brands	41 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	10 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

85.6% of Yum China shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Yum! Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Yum China shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Yum! Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Yum China has a beta of 0.09, indicating that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yum! Brands has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Yum! Brands has a net margin of 25.42% compared to Yum China's net margin of 7.84%. Yum China's return on equity of 15.82% beat Yum! Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Yum China	7.84%	15.82%	8.96%
Yum! Brands	25.42%	-24.57%	22.24%

Yum! Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Yum China. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yum! Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Yum China	$11.80B	1.37	$929M	$2.73	17.28
Yum! Brands	$8.21B	5.14	$1.56B	$7.95	19.46

Yum China pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Yum! Brands pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Yum China pays out 42.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yum! Brands pays out 37.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Yum China has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Yum! Brands has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

Yum China presently has a consensus price target of $59.21, suggesting a potential upside of 25.53%. Yum! Brands has a consensus price target of $174.65, suggesting a potential upside of 12.86%. Given Yum China's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Yum China is more favorable than Yum! Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Yum China	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Yum! Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.62

Summary

Yum! Brands beats Yum China on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Yum China compare to Restaurant Brands International?

Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) and Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Yum China pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Yum China pays out 42.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Yum China has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 11 more articles in the media than Yum China. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 18 mentions for Yum China. Yum China's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of 0.59 indicating that Yum China is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Yum China	16 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Restaurant Brands International	8 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Yum China presently has a consensus price target of $59.21, indicating a potential upside of 25.53%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus price target of $83.91, indicating a potential upside of 5.76%. Given Yum China's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Yum China is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Yum China	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

85.6% of Yum China shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Yum China shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Yum China has a beta of 0.09, indicating that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 13.12% compared to Yum China's net margin of 7.84%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 33.43% beat Yum China's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Yum China	7.84%	15.82%	8.96%
Restaurant Brands International	13.12%	33.43%	6.94%

Yum China has higher revenue and earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Yum China	$11.80B	1.37	$929M	$2.73	17.28
Restaurant Brands International	$9.70B	2.86	$776M	$3.72	21.33

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Yum China on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Yum China compare to Darden Restaurants?

Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) and Darden Restaurants (NYSE:DRI) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Darden Restaurants has a net margin of 9.13% compared to Yum China's net margin of 7.84%. Darden Restaurants' return on equity of 57.44% beat Yum China's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Yum China	7.84%	15.82%	8.96%
Darden Restaurants	9.13%	57.44%	9.62%

In the previous week, Darden Restaurants had 18 more articles in the media than Yum China. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for Darden Restaurants and 18 mentions for Yum China. Darden Restaurants' average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Yum China's score of 1.35 indicating that Darden Restaurants is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Yum China	16 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Darden Restaurants	29 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

85.6% of Yum China shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.6% of Darden Restaurants shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Yum China shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Darden Restaurants shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Yum China currently has a consensus price target of $59.21, indicating a potential upside of 25.53%. Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $230.13, indicating a potential upside of 5.10%. Given Yum China's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Yum China is more favorable than Darden Restaurants.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Yum China	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Darden Restaurants	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Yum China has a beta of 0.09, meaning that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Yum China pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Darden Restaurants pays an annual dividend of $6.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Yum China pays out 42.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Darden Restaurants pays out 62.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Yum China has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Darden Restaurants has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Darden Restaurants has higher revenue and earnings than Yum China. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Darden Restaurants, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Yum China	$11.80B	1.37	$929M	$2.73	17.28
Darden Restaurants	$13.21B	1.89	$1.21B	$10.38	21.09

Summary

Darden Restaurants beats Yum China on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Yum China compare to Aramark?

Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) and Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, Aramark and Aramark both had 18 articles in the media. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 1.58 beat Yum China's score of 1.35 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Aramark	16 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Yum China	16 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Yum China pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Aramark pays out 33.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yum China pays out 42.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Aramark has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Yum China has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Yum China is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Yum China has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aramark. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Aramark	$18.51B	0.85	$326.39M	$1.43	41.64
Yum China	$11.80B	1.37	$929M	$2.73	17.28

Aramark presently has a consensus target price of $69.14, suggesting a potential upside of 16.11%. Yum China has a consensus target price of $59.21, suggesting a potential upside of 25.53%. Given Yum China's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Yum China is more favorable than Aramark.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Aramark	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86
Yum China	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

85.6% of Yum China shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Aramark shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Yum China shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Aramark has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yum China has a beta of 0.09, suggesting that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market.

Yum China has a net margin of 7.84% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.93%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.68% beat Yum China's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Aramark	1.93%	17.68%	4.21%
Yum China	7.84%	15.82%	8.96%

Summary

Aramark and Yum China tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Yum China News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding YUMC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

YUMC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Yum China	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$16.15B	$8.30B	$13.05B	$24.29B
Dividend Yield	2.37%	3.71%	55.69%	3.70%
P/E Ratio	17.28	23.16	46.74	30.23
Price / Sales	1.37	337.96	92.71	20.01
Price / Cash	12.84	22.36	29.14	32.63
Price / Book	2.66	4.86	6.03	7.70
Net Income	$929M	$260.60M	$445.86M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-0.76%	0.25%	-0.31%	-0.16%
1 Month Performance	8.80%	3.09%	2.00%	2.89%
1 Year Performance	1.57%	-3.68%	-1.91%	14.61%

Yum China Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
YUMC Yum China	4.8556 of 5 stars	$47.17 -2.9%	$59.21 +25.5%	+3.2%	$16.15B	$11.80B	17.28	290,000	Positive News
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill	4.6748 of 5 stars	$33.65 +0.4%	$44.16 +31.2%	-12.3%	$42.39B	$11.93B	30.87	131,534	Trending News Analyst Forecast
YUM Yum! Brands	4.6839 of 5 stars	$145.36 -1.9%	$174.65 +20.1%	+6.6%	$40.42B	$8.21B	18.28	49,000	Trending News Analyst Upgrade Insider Trade
QSR Restaurant Brands International	3.8955 of 5 stars	$77.16 -0.6%	$83.70 +8.5%	+30.0%	$27.11B	$9.43B	20.74	53,500	Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
DRI Darden Restaurants	3.9096 of 5 stars	$225.36 +0.0%	$228.88 +1.6%	+7.3%	$25.70B	$13.21B	21.71	209,931	News Coverage Positive News Analyst Upgrade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:YUMC) was last updated on 8/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Yum China (YUMC) Competitors

YUMC vs. CMG, YUM, QSR, DRI, and ARMK

How does Yum China compare to Chipotle Mexican Grill?

Summary

How does Yum China compare to Yum! Brands?

Summary

How does Yum China compare to Restaurant Brands International?

Summary

How does Yum China compare to Darden Restaurants?

Summary

How does Yum China compare to Aramark?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

YUMC vs. The Competition

Yum China Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Yum China (YUMC) Competitors

YUMC vs. CMG, YUM, QSR, DRI, and ARMK

How does Yum China compare to Chipotle Mexican Grill?

Is YUMC or CMG more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, YUMC or CMG?

Do analysts rate YUMC or CMG?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in YUMC or CMG?

Does the media prefer YUMC or CMG?

Which has more volatility & risk, YUMC or CMG?

Summary

How does Yum China compare to Yum! Brands?

Does the media refer more to YUMC or YUM?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in YUMC or YUM?

Which has more volatility and risk, YUMC or YUM?

Is YUMC or YUM more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, YUMC or YUM?

Is YUMC or YUM a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate YUMC or YUM?

Summary

How does Yum China compare to Restaurant Brands International?

Is YUMC or QSR a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor YUMC or QSR?

Do analysts rate YUMC or QSR?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in YUMC or QSR?

Which has more volatility & risk, YUMC or QSR?

Is YUMC or QSR more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, YUMC or QSR?

Summary

How does Yum China compare to Darden Restaurants?

Is YUMC or DRI more profitable?

Does the media favor YUMC or DRI?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in YUMC or DRI?

Do analysts prefer YUMC or DRI?

Which has more volatility & risk, YUMC or DRI?

Is YUMC or DRI a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, YUMC or DRI?

Summary

How does Yum China compare to Aramark?

Does the media refer more to ARMK or YUMC?

Is ARMK or YUMC a better dividend stock?

Which has better earnings and valuation, ARMK or YUMC?

Do analysts rate ARMK or YUMC?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in ARMK or YUMC?

Which has more risk and volatility, ARMK or YUMC?

Is ARMK or YUMC more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

YUMC vs. The Competition

Yum China Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools