Go Pro

Intercontinental Hotels Group (IHG) Competitors

Intercontinental Hotels Group logo
$157.90 -4.38 (-2.70%)
Closing price 08/3/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$157.94 +0.03 (+0.02%)
As of 08/3/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

IHG vs. HLT, QSR, YUMC, ARMK, and HTHT

Should you buy Intercontinental Hotels Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Intercontinental Hotels Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Intercontinental Hotels Group include Hilton Worldwide (HLT), Restaurant Brands International (QSR), Yum China (YUMC), Aramark (ARMK), and H World Group (HTHT).

How does Intercontinental Hotels Group compare to Hilton Worldwide?

Hilton Worldwide (NYSE:HLT) and Intercontinental Hotels Group (NYSE:IHG) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Hilton Worldwide currently has a consensus price target of $353.05, indicating a potential upside of 12.39%. Intercontinental Hotels Group has a consensus price target of $174.50, indicating a potential upside of 10.51%. Given Hilton Worldwide's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Hilton Worldwide is more favorable than Intercontinental Hotels Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hilton Worldwide
0 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.64
Intercontinental Hotels Group
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

In the previous week, Hilton Worldwide had 47 more articles in the media than Intercontinental Hotels Group. MarketBeat recorded 54 mentions for Hilton Worldwide and 7 mentions for Intercontinental Hotels Group. Hilton Worldwide's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's score of 0.57 indicating that Hilton Worldwide is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hilton Worldwide
24 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
15 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Intercontinental Hotels Group
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Hilton Worldwide has a net margin of 12.69% compared to Intercontinental Hotels Group's net margin of 0.00%. Intercontinental Hotels Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Hilton Worldwide's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hilton Worldwide12.69% -35.24% 11.84%
Intercontinental Hotels Group N/A N/A N/A

95.9% of Hilton Worldwide shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.1% of Intercontinental Hotels Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Hilton Worldwide shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hilton Worldwide has higher revenue and earnings than Intercontinental Hotels Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hilton Worldwide$12.04B5.87$1.46B$6.8146.13
Intercontinental Hotels Group$5.19B4.52$758MN/AN/A

Hilton Worldwide has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intercontinental Hotels Group has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Hilton Worldwide pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Intercontinental Hotels Group pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Hilton Worldwide pays out 8.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Hilton Worldwide beats Intercontinental Hotels Group on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intercontinental Hotels Group compare to Restaurant Brands International?

Intercontinental Hotels Group (NYSE:IHG) and Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than Intercontinental Hotels Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intercontinental Hotels Group$5.19B4.52$758MN/AN/A
Restaurant Brands International$9.43B2.70$776M$2.8425.68

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Intercontinental Hotels Group's net margin of 0.00%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 32.80% beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intercontinental Hotels GroupN/A N/A N/A
Restaurant Brands International 9.96%32.80%6.67%

Intercontinental Hotels Group currently has a consensus target price of $174.50, suggesting a potential upside of 10.51%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus target price of $83.86, suggesting a potential upside of 15.01%. Given Restaurant Brands International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Intercontinental Hotels Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intercontinental Hotels Group
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Restaurant Brands International
0 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.65

15.1% of Intercontinental Hotels Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Intercontinental Hotels Group has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 14 more articles in the media than Intercontinental Hotels Group. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 7 mentions for Intercontinental Hotels Group. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's score of 0.57 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Intercontinental Hotels Group
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Restaurant Brands International
11 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Intercontinental Hotels Group pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 91.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Intercontinental Hotels Group on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intercontinental Hotels Group compare to Yum China?

Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) and Intercontinental Hotels Group (NYSE:IHG) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and profitability.

Yum China presently has a consensus target price of $59.21, suggesting a potential upside of 22.40%. Intercontinental Hotels Group has a consensus target price of $174.50, suggesting a potential upside of 10.51%. Given Yum China's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Yum China is more favorable than Intercontinental Hotels Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Yum China
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Intercontinental Hotels Group
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Yum China has higher revenue and earnings than Intercontinental Hotels Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Yum China$11.80B1.43$929M$2.7317.72
Intercontinental Hotels Group$5.19B4.52$758MN/AN/A

85.6% of Yum China shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.1% of Intercontinental Hotels Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Yum China shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Yum China pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Intercontinental Hotels Group pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Yum China pays out 42.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yum China has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Yum China is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Yum China has a net margin of 7.84% compared to Intercontinental Hotels Group's net margin of 0.00%. Yum China's return on equity of 15.73% beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Yum China7.84% 15.73% 8.96%
Intercontinental Hotels Group N/A N/A N/A

Yum China has a beta of 0.09, meaning that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intercontinental Hotels Group has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Yum China had 19 more articles in the media than Intercontinental Hotels Group. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Yum China and 7 mentions for Intercontinental Hotels Group. Yum China's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's score of 0.57 indicating that Yum China is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Yum China
12 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Intercontinental Hotels Group
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Yum China beats Intercontinental Hotels Group on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intercontinental Hotels Group compare to Aramark?

Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) and Intercontinental Hotels Group (NYSE:IHG) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

15.1% of Intercontinental Hotels Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Aramark shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Intercontinental Hotels Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aramark.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aramark$18.51B0.81$326.39M$1.3442.32
Intercontinental Hotels Group$5.19B4.52$758MN/AN/A

Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Intercontinental Hotels Group pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Aramark pays out 35.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Aramark has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Aramark has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intercontinental Hotels Group has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Aramark currently has a consensus target price of $60.63, indicating a potential upside of 6.90%. Intercontinental Hotels Group has a consensus target price of $174.50, indicating a potential upside of 10.51%. Given Intercontinental Hotels Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Intercontinental Hotels Group is more favorable than Aramark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aramark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
Intercontinental Hotels Group
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Aramark has a net margin of 1.84% compared to Intercontinental Hotels Group's net margin of 0.00%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.05% beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aramark1.84% 17.05% 4.02%
Intercontinental Hotels Group N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Aramark and Aramark both had 7 articles in the media. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's score of 0.57 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Aramark
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Intercontinental Hotels Group
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Aramark beats Intercontinental Hotels Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Intercontinental Hotels Group compare to H World Group?

H World Group (NASDAQ:HTHT) and Intercontinental Hotels Group (NYSE:IHG) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

H World Group presently has a consensus target price of $61.20, indicating a potential upside of 43.56%. Intercontinental Hotels Group has a consensus target price of $174.50, indicating a potential upside of 10.51%. Given H World Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe H World Group is more favorable than Intercontinental Hotels Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
H World Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Intercontinental Hotels Group
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Intercontinental Hotels Group has higher revenue and earnings than H World Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
H World Group$3.62B3.62$726M$2.2319.12
Intercontinental Hotels Group$5.19B4.52$758MN/AN/A

H World Group has a beta of 0.15, suggesting that its share price is 85% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intercontinental Hotels Group has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

H World Group has a net margin of 19.22% compared to Intercontinental Hotels Group's net margin of 0.00%. H World Group's return on equity of 39.73% beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
H World Group19.22% 39.73% 7.47%
Intercontinental Hotels Group N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Intercontinental Hotels Group had 2 more articles in the media than H World Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Intercontinental Hotels Group and 5 mentions for H World Group. H World Group's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's score of 0.57 indicating that H World Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
H World Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Intercontinental Hotels Group
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

46.4% of H World Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.1% of Intercontinental Hotels Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 49.4% of H World Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

H World Group pays an annual dividend of $2.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Intercontinental Hotels Group pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. H World Group pays out 114.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

H World Group beats Intercontinental Hotels Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Intercontinental Hotels Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IHG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IHG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IHG vs. The Competition

MetricIntercontinental Hotels GroupHotels, Restaurants & Leisure IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$24.12B$8.17B$13.12B$23.73B
Dividend Yield1.50%3.86%53.32%4.21%
P/E RatioN/A22.4347.2431.49
Price / Sales4.52340.8791.1114.43
Price / Cash26.7521.9418.9418.72
Price / Book-8.754.974.544.83
Net Income$758M$261.43M$444.07M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-2.70%0.00%0.42%0.34%
1 Month Performance-7.05%-1.37%0.85%0.59%
1 Year Performance36.74%-3.67%2.87%18.76%

Intercontinental Hotels Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IHG
Intercontinental Hotels Group
3.2443 of 5 stars
$157.91
-2.7%
$174.50
+10.5%
+37.7%$24.12B$5.19BN/A13,049
HLT
Hilton Worldwide
4.536 of 5 stars
$318.55
-3.7%
$350.36
+10.0%
+20.5%$72.48B$12.28B48.61182,000
QSR
Restaurant Brands International
4.1809 of 5 stars
$75.54
+1.5%
$83.86
+11.0%
+7.1%$26.33B$9.43B26.5553,500
YUMC
Yum China
4.8302 of 5 stars
$45.77
+2.3%
$59.05
+29.0%
+3.5%$15.99B$11.80B17.55290,000
ARMK
Aramark
4.3067 of 5 stars
$57.43
-0.8%
$60.63
+5.6%
+33.6%$15.16B$18.51B43.02278,390

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:IHG) was last updated on 8/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners