Restaurant Brands International Competitors

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Chipotle Mexican Grill (NYSE:CMG) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Restaurant Brands International and Chipotle Mexican Grill, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus target price of $65.1818, suggesting a potential upside of 5.25%. Chipotle Mexican Grill has a consensus target price of $1,526.9655, suggesting a potential upside of 2.83%. Given Restaurant Brands International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Chipotle Mexican Grill.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

79.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Chipotle Mexican Grill's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than Chipotle Mexican Grill. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chipotle Mexican Grill, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Chipotle Mexican Grill's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chipotle Mexican Grill has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Yum! Brands (NYSE:YUM) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Restaurant Brands International and Yum! Brands, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus target price of $65.1818, suggesting a potential upside of 5.25%. Yum! Brands has a consensus target price of $104.00, suggesting a potential downside of 0.49%. Given Restaurant Brands International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Yum! Brands.

Dividends

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Yum! Brands pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 76.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Yum! Brands pays out 56.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Yum! Brands has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

79.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.2% of Yum! Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Yum! Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Yum! Brands' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Yum! Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yum! Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Yum! Brands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Yum! Brands has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Yum! Brands on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Restaurant Brands International and Yum China, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus target price of $65.1818, suggesting a potential upside of 5.25%. Yum China has a consensus target price of $57.6750, suggesting a potential downside of 3.08%. Given Restaurant Brands International's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Yum China.

Dividends

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Yum China pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 76.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Yum China pays out 12.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Yum China has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

79.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.6% of Yum China shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Yum China shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Yum China's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Yum China has higher revenue and earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yum China, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Yum China's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Yum China has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its share price is 13% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Yum China on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Darden Restaurants (NYSE:DRI) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Restaurant Brands International and Darden Restaurants, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus target price of $65.1818, suggesting a potential upside of 5.25%. Darden Restaurants has a consensus target price of $114.1833, suggesting a potential downside of 17.87%. Given Restaurant Brands International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Darden Restaurants.

Dividends

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Darden Restaurants pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 76.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Darden Restaurants pays out 47.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

79.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.4% of Darden Restaurants shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Darden Restaurants shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Darden Restaurants' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Restaurant Brands International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Darden Restaurants. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Darden Restaurants, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Darden Restaurants' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its share price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Darden Restaurants on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Aramark's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

79.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.5% of Aramark shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.3% of Aramark shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 76.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Aramark pays out -258.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Aramark has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Aramark's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Restaurant Brands International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aramark. Aramark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.88, suggesting that its share price is 88% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Restaurant Brands International and Aramark, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus target price of $65.1818, suggesting a potential upside of 5.25%. Aramark has a consensus target price of $31.4167, suggesting a potential downside of 18.48%. Given Restaurant Brands International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Aramark.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Aramark on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Texas Roadhouse (NASDAQ:TXRH) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Texas Roadhouse's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

79.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.7% of Texas Roadhouse shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.2% of Texas Roadhouse shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Texas Roadhouse's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than Texas Roadhouse. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Roadhouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 1, suggesting that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Restaurant Brands International and Texas Roadhouse, as provided by MarketBeat.

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus price target of $65.1818, suggesting a potential upside of 5.25%. Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $75.75, suggesting a potential downside of 17.48%. Given Restaurant Brands International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Texas Roadhouse.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Texas Roadhouse on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.