Does the media refer more to DASH or QSR?

In the previous week, DoorDash had 5 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for DoorDash and 19 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat DoorDash's score of 0.34 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment DoorDash 7 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 3 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Restaurant Brands International 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor QSR or YUM?

In the previous week, Yum! Brands had 24 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 43 mentions for Yum! Brands and 19 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Yum! Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of 0.37 indicating that Yum! Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Restaurant Brands International 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Yum! Brands 30 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to DRI or QSR?

In the previous week, Darden Restaurants had 7 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Darden Restaurants and 19 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Darden Restaurants' average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of 0.37 indicating that Darden Restaurants is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Darden Restaurants 23 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Restaurant Brands International 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer ARMK or QSR?

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 7 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 12 mentions for Aramark. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 1.53 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of 0.37 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Aramark 10 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Restaurant Brands International 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) Competitors

$80.74 +1.19 (+1.50%)

As of 08/21/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

Compare

QSR vs. DASH, CMG, YUM, DRI, and ARMK

Should you buy Restaurant Brands International stock or one of its competitors? Restaurant Brands International's main competitors and comparable companies include DoorDash (DASH), Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG), Yum! Brands (YUM), Darden Restaurants (DRI), and Aramark (ARMK). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "restaurants" industry.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to DoorDash?

DoorDash (NASDAQ:DASH) and Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, DoorDash had 5 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for DoorDash and 19 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat DoorDash's score of 0.34 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
DoorDash	7 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	3 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Restaurant Brands International	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

DoorDash has higher revenue and earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DoorDash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
DoorDash	$13.72B	7.06	$935M	$1.91	117.01
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.99	$776M	$3.72	21.70

DoorDash presently has a consensus target price of $254.53, indicating a potential upside of 13.89%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus target price of $83.70, indicating a potential upside of 3.66%. Given DoorDash's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe DoorDash is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
DoorDash	0 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	23 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 13.12% compared to DoorDash's net margin of 5.29%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 33.43% beat DoorDash's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
DoorDash	5.29%	8.48%	4.37%
Restaurant Brands International	13.12%	33.43%	6.94%

90.6% of DoorDash shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.3% of DoorDash shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

DoorDash has a beta of 1.78, suggesting that its share price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

DoorDash beats Restaurant Brands International on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Chipotle Mexican Grill?

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Chipotle Mexican Grill (NYSE:CMG) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 13.12% compared to Chipotle Mexican Grill's net margin of 11.43%. Chipotle Mexican Grill's return on equity of 54.65% beat Restaurant Brands International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International	13.12%	33.43%	6.94%
Chipotle Mexican Grill	11.43%	54.65%	16.21%

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.3% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Restaurant Brands International presently has a consensus target price of $83.70, suggesting a potential upside of 3.66%. Chipotle Mexican Grill has a consensus target price of $44.16, suggesting a potential upside of 19.87%. Given Chipotle Mexican Grill's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Chipotle Mexican Grill is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Chipotle Mexican Grill	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	24 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73

In the previous week, Chipotle Mexican Grill had 24 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 43 mentions for Chipotle Mexican Grill and 19 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Chipotle Mexican Grill's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of 0.37 indicating that Chipotle Mexican Grill is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Chipotle Mexican Grill	34 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Chipotle Mexican Grill has higher revenue and earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chipotle Mexican Grill, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.99	$776M	$3.72	21.70
Chipotle Mexican Grill	$11.93B	3.91	$1.54B	$1.09	33.80

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chipotle Mexican Grill has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chipotle Mexican Grill beats Restaurant Brands International on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Yum! Brands?

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Yum! Brands (NYSE:YUM) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

In the previous week, Yum! Brands had 24 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 43 mentions for Yum! Brands and 19 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Yum! Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of 0.37 indicating that Yum! Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Yum! Brands	30 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Yum! Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Yum! Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Yum! Brands pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yum! Brands pays out 37.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Restaurant Brands International has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Yum! Brands has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Yum! Brands has a net margin of 25.42% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 13.12%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 33.43% beat Yum! Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International	13.12%	33.43%	6.94%
Yum! Brands	25.42%	-24.57%	22.24%

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yum! Brands has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Restaurant Brands International presently has a consensus price target of $83.70, suggesting a potential upside of 3.66%. Yum! Brands has a consensus price target of $174.65, suggesting a potential upside of 13.92%. Given Yum! Brands' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Yum! Brands is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Yum! Brands	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63

Yum! Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Yum! Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.99	$776M	$3.72	21.70
Yum! Brands	$8.21B	5.09	$1.56B	$7.95	19.28

Summary

Yum! Brands beats Restaurant Brands International on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Darden Restaurants?

Darden Restaurants (NYSE:DRI) and Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

In the previous week, Darden Restaurants had 7 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Darden Restaurants and 19 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Darden Restaurants' average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of 0.37 indicating that Darden Restaurants is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Darden Restaurants	23 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Restaurant Brands International	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Darden Restaurants presently has a consensus target price of $228.88, suggesting a potential upside of 3.19%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus target price of $83.70, suggesting a potential upside of 3.66%. Given Restaurant Brands International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Darden Restaurants.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Darden Restaurants	0 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Darden Restaurants has higher revenue and earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Darden Restaurants is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Darden Restaurants	$13.21B	1.92	$1.21B	$10.38	21.37
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.99	$776M	$3.72	21.70

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 13.12% compared to Darden Restaurants' net margin of 9.13%. Darden Restaurants' return on equity of 57.44% beat Restaurant Brands International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Darden Restaurants	9.13%	57.44%	9.62%
Restaurant Brands International	13.12%	33.43%	6.94%

Darden Restaurants pays an annual dividend of $6.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Darden Restaurants pays out 62.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Darden Restaurants has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

93.6% of Darden Restaurants shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Darden Restaurants shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Darden Restaurants beats Restaurant Brands International on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Aramark?

Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) and Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Aramark has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 7 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 12 mentions for Aramark. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 1.53 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of 0.37 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Aramark	10 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Restaurant Brands International	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Aramark presently has a consensus price target of $69.14, indicating a potential upside of 15.80%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus price target of $83.70, indicating a potential upside of 3.66%. Given Aramark's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Aramark is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Aramark	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Aramark pays out 33.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Aramark has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 13.12% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.93%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 33.43% beat Aramark's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Aramark	1.93%	17.68%	4.21%
Restaurant Brands International	13.12%	33.43%	6.94%

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Aramark shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Restaurant Brands International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aramark. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Aramark	$18.51B	0.85	$326.39M	$1.43	41.76
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.99	$776M	$3.72	21.70

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Aramark on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Restaurant Brands International News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QSR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

QSR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Restaurant Brands International	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$28.24B	$8.29B	$13.23B	$24.31B
Dividend Yield	3.22%	3.72%	56.57%	3.70%
P/E Ratio	21.70	23.22	46.96	30.31
Price / Sales	2.99	319.51	88.85	20.99
Price / Cash	16.34	22.31	29.13	32.49
Price / Book	5.23	4.89	3.93	6.77
Net Income	$776M	$260.60M	$445.72M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	4.13%	0.57%	-0.26%	-0.65%
1 Month Performance	11.51%	4.15%	2.74%	3.38%
1 Year Performance	27.54%	-3.43%	-1.57%	14.90%

Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
QSR Restaurant Brands International	4.1977 of 5 stars	$80.74 +1.5%	$83.70 +3.7%	+27.5%	$28.24B	$9.43B	21.70	53,500	Trending News Analyst Revision
DASH DoorDash	3.7591 of 5 stars	$218.13 +2.5%	$254.09 +16.5%	-9.6%	$94.58B	$15.89B	114.28	31,400	Analyst Forecast
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill	4.7875 of 5 stars	$33.80 +0.1%	$44.16 +30.7%	-15.5%	$42.75B	$12.42B	31.00	131,534	Options Volume
YUM Yum! Brands	4.8768 of 5 stars	$146.31 +0.8%	$174.65 +19.4%	+3.8%	$39.91B	$8.72B	18.40	49,000	Trending News
DRI Darden Restaurants	3.8107 of 5 stars	$222.34 -1.4%	$228.88 +2.9%	+6.4%	$25.37B	$13.21B	21.42	209,931	News Coverage Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:QSR) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) Competitors

QSR vs. DASH, CMG, YUM, DRI, and ARMK

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to DoorDash?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Chipotle Mexican Grill?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Yum! Brands?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Darden Restaurants?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Aramark?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

QSR vs. The Competition

Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) Competitors

QSR vs. DASH, CMG, YUM, DRI, and ARMK

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to DoorDash?

Does the media refer more to DASH or QSR?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, DASH or QSR?

Do analysts rate DASH or QSR?

Is DASH or QSR more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in DASH or QSR?

Which has more risk and volatility, DASH or QSR?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Chipotle Mexican Grill?

Is QSR or CMG more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in QSR or CMG?

Do analysts rate QSR or CMG?

Does the media favor QSR or CMG?

Which has better earnings & valuation, QSR or CMG?

Which has more risk & volatility, QSR or CMG?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Yum! Brands?

Does the media favor QSR or YUM?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in QSR or YUM?

Is QSR or YUM a better dividend stock?

Is QSR or YUM more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, QSR or YUM?

Do analysts prefer QSR or YUM?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, QSR or YUM?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Darden Restaurants?

Does the media refer more to DRI or QSR?

Which has more risk & volatility, DRI or QSR?

Do analysts prefer DRI or QSR?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, DRI or QSR?

Is DRI or QSR more profitable?

Is DRI or QSR a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in DRI or QSR?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Aramark?

Which has more risk and volatility, ARMK or QSR?

Does the media prefer ARMK or QSR?

Do analysts prefer ARMK or QSR?

Is ARMK or QSR a better dividend stock?

Is ARMK or QSR more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in ARMK or QSR?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, ARMK or QSR?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

QSR vs. The Competition

Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools