Restaurant Brands International (QSR) Competitors

$76.44 -1.86 (-2.38%)

Closing price 05/13/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$76.50 +0.07 (+0.09%)

As of 05/13/2026 07:50 PM Eastern

QSR vs. HLT, IHG, YUMC, HTHT, and ARMK

Should you buy Restaurant Brands International stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Restaurant Brands International with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Restaurant Brands International include Hilton Worldwide (HLT), Intercontinental Hotels Group (IHG), Yum China (YUMC), H World Group (HTHT), and Aramark (ARMK). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Hilton Worldwide?

Hilton Worldwide (NYSE:HLT) and Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

95.9% of Hilton Worldwide shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Hilton Worldwide shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hilton Worldwide presently has a consensus target price of $348.64, indicating a potential upside of 12.05%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus target price of $83.33, indicating a potential upside of 9.02%. Given Hilton Worldwide's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Hilton Worldwide is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hilton Worldwide	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.61
Restaurant Brands International	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.58

Hilton Worldwide has higher revenue and earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hilton Worldwide, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hilton Worldwide	$12.04B	5.88	$1.46B	$6.55	47.50
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.81	$776M	$2.84	26.91

Hilton Worldwide has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Hilton Worldwide pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Hilton Worldwide pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International pays out 91.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Hilton Worldwide has a net margin of 12.56% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 9.96%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 32.80% beat Hilton Worldwide's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hilton Worldwide	12.56%	-38.21%	12.04%
Restaurant Brands International	9.96%	32.80%	6.67%

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 2 more articles in the media than Hilton Worldwide. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 17 mentions for Hilton Worldwide. Hilton Worldwide's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of 0.71 indicating that Hilton Worldwide is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hilton Worldwide	6 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Restaurant Brands International	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Hilton Worldwide beats Restaurant Brands International on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Intercontinental Hotels Group (NYSE:IHG) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 6 more articles in the media than Intercontinental Hotels Group. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 13 mentions for Intercontinental Hotels Group. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's score of 0.39 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Intercontinental Hotels Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.1% of Intercontinental Hotels Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Intercontinental Hotels Group's net margin of 0.00%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 32.80% beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International	9.96%	32.80%	6.67%
Intercontinental Hotels Group	N/A	N/A	N/A

Restaurant Brands International presently has a consensus price target of $83.33, indicating a potential upside of 9.02%. Given Restaurant Brands International's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Intercontinental Hotels Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.58
Intercontinental Hotels Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than Intercontinental Hotels Group.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.81	$776M	$2.84	26.91
Intercontinental Hotels Group	$5.19B	4.33	$758M	N/A	N/A

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intercontinental Hotels Group has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Intercontinental Hotels Group pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 91.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Intercontinental Hotels Group on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Yum China?

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 10 more articles in the media than Yum China. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 9 mentions for Yum China. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Yum China's score of 0.65 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Yum China	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.6% of Yum China shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Yum China shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Yum China pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 91.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Yum China pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Yum China has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Yum China's net margin of 7.83%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 32.80% beat Yum China's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International	9.96%	32.80%	6.67%
Yum China	7.83%	15.11%	8.67%

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yum China has a beta of 0.13, indicating that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

Restaurant Brands International presently has a consensus price target of $83.33, indicating a potential upside of 9.02%. Yum China has a consensus price target of $59.05, indicating a potential upside of 25.76%. Given Yum China's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Yum China is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.58
Yum China	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Yum China has higher revenue and earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.81	$776M	$2.84	26.91
Yum China	$11.80B	1.39	$929M	$2.61	17.99

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Yum China on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to H World Group?

H World Group (NASDAQ:HTHT) and Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

46.4% of H World Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. 49.4% of H World Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 12 more articles in the media than H World Group. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 7 mentions for H World Group. H World Group's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of 0.71 indicating that H World Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
H World Group	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Restaurant Brands International	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than H World Group. H World Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
H World Group	$3.62B	3.99	$726M	$2.25	20.86
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.81	$776M	$2.84	26.91

H World Group has a net margin of 20.05% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 9.96%. H World Group's return on equity of 37.79% beat Restaurant Brands International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
H World Group	20.05%	37.79%	7.11%
Restaurant Brands International	9.96%	32.80%	6.67%

H World Group pays an annual dividend of $2.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. H World Group pays out 113.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Restaurant Brands International pays out 91.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years.

H World Group has a beta of 0.15, meaning that its share price is 85% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

H World Group currently has a consensus price target of $54.80, indicating a potential upside of 16.77%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus price target of $83.33, indicating a potential upside of 9.02%. Given H World Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe H World Group is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
H World Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.17
Restaurant Brands International	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.58

Summary

H World Group and Restaurant Brands International tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Aramark?

Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) and Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Aramark had 4 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Aramark and 19 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of 0.71 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Aramark	6 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Restaurant Brands International	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Aramark currently has a consensus price target of $53.36, indicating a potential upside of 5.10%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus price target of $83.33, indicating a potential upside of 9.02%. Given Restaurant Brands International's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Aramark.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Aramark	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Restaurant Brands International	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.58

Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Aramark pays out 40.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International pays out 91.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Aramark has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Restaurant Brands International has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Aramark shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Restaurant Brands International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aramark. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Aramark	$18.51B	0.72	$326.39M	$1.19	42.67
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.81	$776M	$2.84	26.91

Aramark has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 32.80% beat Aramark's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Aramark	1.84%	17.05%	4.02%
Restaurant Brands International	9.96%	32.80%	6.67%

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Aramark on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Restaurant Brands International News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QSR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

QSR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Restaurant Brands International	RETAIL Industry	Retail Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$27.20B	$11.06B	$27.34B	$22.96B
Dividend Yield	3.32%	2.75%	178.41%	4.07%
P/E Ratio	26.91	24.86	16.71	28.29
Price / Sales	2.81	1.55	4.37	24.51
Price / Cash	15.82	13.50	14.78	25.11
Price / Book	5.02	4.11	5.90	4.73
Net Income	$776M	$393.15M	$960.70M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-3.45%	-2.84%	-3.51%	-1.11%
1 Month Performance	-2.74%	-1.23%	-2.59%	1.36%
1 Year Performance	12.64%	-11.93%	-1.30%	24.41%

Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
QSR Restaurant Brands International	3.6833 of 5 stars	$76.44 -2.4%	$83.33 +9.0%	+12.7%	$27.20B	$9.43B	26.91	53,500	Analyst Upgrade
HLT Hilton Worldwide	4.2744 of 5 stars	$313.80 +0.8%	$348.59 +11.1%	+21.1%	$71.41B	$12.28B	47.89	182,000	Analyst Forecast
IHG Intercontinental Hotels Group	2.3141 of 5 stars	$142.64 +2.2%	N/A	+21.1%	$21.41B	$5.19B	N/A	13,049	Analyst Revision
YUMC Yum China	4.5066 of 5 stars	$48.57 +1.5%	$59.05 +21.6%	+1.8%	$17.06B	$11.80B	18.61	290,000
HTHT H World Group	4.4068 of 5 stars	$48.56 +1.3%	$54.80 +12.8%	+23.8%	$14.94B	$25.31B	21.57	28,502	Upcoming Earnings

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:QSR) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) Competitors

QSR vs. HLT, IHG, YUMC, HTHT, and ARMK

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Hilton Worldwide?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Yum China?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to H World Group?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Aramark?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

QSR vs. The Competition

Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) Competitors

QSR vs. HLT, IHG, YUMC, HTHT, and ARMK

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Hilton Worldwide?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in HLT or QSR?

Do analysts prefer HLT or QSR?

Which has better earnings and valuation, HLT or QSR?

Which has more risk & volatility, HLT or QSR?

Is HLT or QSR a better dividend stock?

Is HLT or QSR more profitable?

Does the media prefer HLT or QSR?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

Does the media favor QSR or IHG?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in QSR or IHG?

Is QSR or IHG more profitable?

Do analysts prefer QSR or IHG?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, QSR or IHG?

Which has more volatility and risk, QSR or IHG?

Is QSR or IHG a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Yum China?

Does the media favor QSR or YUMC?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in QSR or YUMC?

Is QSR or YUMC a better dividend stock?

Is QSR or YUMC more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, QSR or YUMC?

Do analysts prefer QSR or YUMC?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, QSR or YUMC?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to H World Group?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in HTHT or QSR?

Does the media favor HTHT or QSR?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, HTHT or QSR?

Is HTHT or QSR more profitable?

Is HTHT or QSR a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, HTHT or QSR?

Do analysts recommend HTHT or QSR?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Aramark?

Does the media prefer ARMK or QSR?

Do analysts recommend ARMK or QSR?

Is ARMK or QSR a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of ARMK or QSR?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, ARMK or QSR?

Which has more risk & volatility, ARMK or QSR?

Is ARMK or QSR more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

QSR vs. The Competition

Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools