Free Trial

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) Competitors

Restaurant Brands International logo
$73.06 +1.49 (+2.08%)
As of 11:16 AM Eastern

QSR vs. HLT, IHG, YUMC, ARMK, and HTHT

Should you buy Restaurant Brands International stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Restaurant Brands International with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Restaurant Brands International include Hilton Worldwide (HLT), Intercontinental Hotels Group (IHG), Yum China (YUMC), Aramark (ARMK), and H World Group (HTHT). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Hilton Worldwide?

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Hilton Worldwide (NYSE:HLT) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and risk.

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Hilton Worldwide pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 91.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hilton Worldwide pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.9% of Hilton Worldwide shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Hilton Worldwide shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hilton Worldwide has higher revenue and earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hilton Worldwide, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International$9.43B2.69$776M$2.8425.73
Hilton Worldwide$12.04B6.33$1.46B$6.5551.13

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus target price of $83.54, indicating a potential upside of 14.35%. Hilton Worldwide has a consensus target price of $348.55, indicating a potential upside of 4.08%. Given Restaurant Brands International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Hilton Worldwide.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62
Hilton Worldwide
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.61

In the previous week, Hilton Worldwide had 1 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Hilton Worldwide and 9 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Hilton Worldwide's score of 0.51 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hilton Worldwide
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hilton Worldwide has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Hilton Worldwide has a net margin of 12.56% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 9.96%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 32.80% beat Hilton Worldwide's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International9.96% 32.80% 6.67%
Hilton Worldwide 12.56%-38.21%12.04%

Summary

Hilton Worldwide beats Restaurant Brands International on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Intercontinental Hotels Group (NYSE:IHG) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 8 more articles in the media than Intercontinental Hotels Group. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 1 mentions for Intercontinental Hotels Group. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's score of 0.23 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Intercontinental Hotels Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intercontinental Hotels Group has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Intercontinental Hotels Group pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 91.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Restaurant Brands International has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Intercontinental Hotels Group's net margin of 0.00%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 32.80% beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International9.96% 32.80% 6.67%
Intercontinental Hotels Group N/A N/A N/A

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than Intercontinental Hotels Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International$9.43B2.69$776M$2.8425.73
Intercontinental Hotels Group$5.19B4.60$758MN/AN/A

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.1% of Intercontinental Hotels Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus target price of $83.54, indicating a potential upside of 14.35%. Intercontinental Hotels Group has a consensus target price of $154.00, indicating a potential downside of 3.58%. Given Restaurant Brands International's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Intercontinental Hotels Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62
Intercontinental Hotels Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Intercontinental Hotels Group on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Yum China?

Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) and Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Yum China pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Yum China pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International pays out 91.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Yum China has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Yum China's net margin of 7.83%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 32.80% beat Yum China's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Yum China7.83% 15.11% 8.67%
Restaurant Brands International 9.96%32.80%6.67%

85.6% of Yum China shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Yum China shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Yum China has higher revenue and earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Yum China$11.80B1.28$929M$2.6116.59
Restaurant Brands International$9.43B2.69$776M$2.8425.73

Yum China has a beta of 0.09, suggesting that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Yum China presently has a consensus price target of $59.05, suggesting a potential upside of 36.33%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus price target of $83.54, suggesting a potential upside of 14.35%. Given Yum China's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Yum China is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Yum China
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Restaurant Brands International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 7 more articles in the media than Yum China. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 2 mentions for Yum China. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Yum China's score of 0.02 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Yum China
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Restaurant Brands International
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Yum China on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Aramark?

Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) and Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Aramark currently has a consensus price target of $54.50, indicating a potential upside of 1.13%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus price target of $83.54, indicating a potential upside of 14.35%. Given Restaurant Brands International's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Aramark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aramark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
Restaurant Brands International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 7 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 2 mentions for Aramark. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Aramark's score of 0.67 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Aramark
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Restaurant Brands International
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 32.80% beat Aramark's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aramark1.84% 17.05% 4.02%
Restaurant Brands International 9.96%32.80%6.67%

Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Aramark pays out 35.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International pays out 91.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Aramark has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Aramark shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Restaurant Brands International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aramark. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aramark$18.51B0.77$326.39M$1.3440.22
Restaurant Brands International$9.43B2.69$776M$2.8425.73

Aramark has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Aramark on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to H World Group?

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and H World Group (NASDAQ:HTHT) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, H World Group has a beta of 0.11, suggesting that its share price is 89% less volatile than the broader market.

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus price target of $83.54, suggesting a potential upside of 14.35%. H World Group has a consensus price target of $61.20, suggesting a potential upside of 35.37%. Given H World Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe H World Group is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62
H World Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 1 more articles in the media than H World Group. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 8 mentions for H World Group. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat H World Group's score of 0.86 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
H World Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than H World Group. H World Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International$9.43B2.69$776M$2.8425.73
H World Group$3.62B3.84$726M$2.2320.27

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. H World Group pays an annual dividend of $2.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 91.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. H World Group pays out 114.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Restaurant Brands International has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years.

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.4% of H World Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 49.4% of H World Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

H World Group has a net margin of 19.22% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 9.96%. H World Group's return on equity of 39.73% beat Restaurant Brands International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International9.96% 32.80% 6.67%
H World Group 19.22%39.73%7.47%

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats H World Group on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Restaurant Brands International News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for QSR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QSR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

QSR vs. The Competition

MetricRestaurant Brands InternationalRETAIL IndustryRetail SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$25.38B$10.73B$26.94B$23.15B
Dividend Yield3.57%2.70%178.37%4.09%
P/E Ratio25.7324.9919.5831.23
Price / Sales2.691.544.2514.76
Price / Cash14.7214.9315.0124.78
Price / Book4.904.496.074.70
Net Income$776M$392.93M$969.96M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-2.20%-3.28%-1.26%-0.15%
1 Month Performance-8.71%-3.86%-2.14%0.75%
1 Year Performance1.87%-13.93%-0.22%26.30%

Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
QSR
Restaurant Brands International
4.4044 of 5 stars
$73.06
+2.1%
$83.54
+14.3%
-0.6%$25.38B$9.43B25.7353,500
HLT
Hilton Worldwide
3.765 of 5 stars
$322.47
+0.4%
$348.55
+8.1%
+33.6%$73.41B$12.04B49.23182,000
IHG
Intercontinental Hotels Group
2.0537 of 5 stars
$153.24
+0.1%
$154.00
+0.5%
+37.4%$22.98B$5.19BN/A13,049
YUMC
Yum China
4.6533 of 5 stars
$44.09
-1.1%
$59.05
+33.9%
-1.1%$15.39B$11.80B16.89290,000
ARMK
Aramark
3.1009 of 5 stars
$51.75
+1.0%
$54.25
+4.8%
+34.6%$13.61B$18.51B38.62278,390

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:QSR) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners