Question 1

Do analysts prefer HLT or QSR?

Accepted Answer

Hilton Worldwide currently has a consensus price target of $349.45, suggesting a potential upside of 8.28%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus price target of $83.33, suggesting a potential upside of 10.24%. Given Restaurant Brands International's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Hilton Worldwide. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Hilton Worldwide 0 Sell rating(s) 9 Hold rating(s) 14 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.61 Restaurant Brands International 1 Sell rating(s) 8 Hold rating(s) 16 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.60

Question 2

Is HLT or QSR a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

Hilton Worldwide pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Hilton Worldwide pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International pays out 91.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Restaurant Brands International has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Question 3

Which has better earnings and valuation, HLT or QSR?

Accepted Answer

Hilton Worldwide has higher revenue and earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hilton Worldwide, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Hilton Worldwide $12.04B 6.10 $1.46B $6.55 49.27 Restaurant Brands International $9.43B 2.80 $776M $2.84 26.62

Question 4

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in HLT or QSR?

Accepted Answer

95.9% of Hilton Worldwide shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Hilton Worldwide shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Question 5

Is HLT or QSR more profitable?

Accepted Answer

Hilton Worldwide has a net margin of 12.56% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 9.96%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 32.80% beat Hilton Worldwide's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Hilton Worldwide 12.56% -38.21% 12.04% Restaurant Brands International 9.96% 32.80% 6.67%

Question 6

Which has more risk and volatility, HLT or QSR?

Accepted Answer

Hilton Worldwide has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Question 7

Does the media refer more to HLT or QSR?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, Hilton Worldwide had 7 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Hilton Worldwide and 8 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Hilton Worldwide's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of 0.76 indicating that Hilton Worldwide is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hilton Worldwide 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Restaurant Brands International 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Question 8

Do analysts prefer IHG or QSR?

Accepted Answer

Intercontinental Hotels Group presently has a consensus target price of $174.50, suggesting a potential upside of 7.49%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus target price of $83.33, suggesting a potential upside of 10.24%. Given Restaurant Brands International's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Intercontinental Hotels Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Intercontinental Hotels Group 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.83 Restaurant Brands International 1 Sell rating(s) 8 Hold rating(s) 16 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.60

Question 9

Is IHG or QSR a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

Intercontinental Hotels Group pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 91.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Question 10

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, IHG or QSR?

Accepted Answer

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than Intercontinental Hotels Group. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Intercontinental Hotels Group $5.19B 4.66 $758M N/A N/A Restaurant Brands International $9.43B 2.80 $776M $2.84 26.62

Question 11

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of IHG or QSR?

Accepted Answer

15.1% of Intercontinental Hotels Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Question 12

Is IHG or QSR more profitable?

Accepted Answer

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Intercontinental Hotels Group's net margin of 0.00%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 32.80% beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Intercontinental Hotels Group N/A N/A N/A Restaurant Brands International 9.96% 32.80% 6.67%

Question 13

Which has more risk and volatility, IHG or QSR?

Accepted Answer

Intercontinental Hotels Group has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Question 14

Does the media prefer IHG or QSR?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 8 more articles in the media than Intercontinental Hotels Group. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 0 mentions for Intercontinental Hotels Group. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Overall Sentiment Intercontinental Hotels Group Neutral Restaurant Brands International Positive

Question 15

Do analysts rate YUMC or QSR?

Accepted Answer

Yum China presently has a consensus target price of $59.05, indicating a potential upside of 34.36%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus target price of $83.33, indicating a potential upside of 10.24%. Given Yum China's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Yum China is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Yum China 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75 Restaurant Brands International 1 Sell rating(s) 8 Hold rating(s) 16 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.60

Question 16

Is YUMC or QSR a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

Yum China pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Yum China pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International pays out 91.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Yum China has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Restaurant Brands International has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Question 17

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, YUMC or QSR?

Accepted Answer

Yum China has higher revenue and earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Yum China $11.80B 1.30 $929M $2.61 16.84 Restaurant Brands International $9.43B 2.80 $776M $2.84 26.62

Question 18

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in YUMC or QSR?

Accepted Answer

85.6% of Yum China shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Yum China shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Question 19

Is YUMC or QSR more profitable?

Accepted Answer

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Yum China's net margin of 7.83%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 32.80% beat Yum China's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Yum China 7.83% 15.11% 8.67% Restaurant Brands International 9.96% 32.80% 6.67%

Question 20

Which has more risk & volatility, YUMC or QSR?

Accepted Answer

Yum China has a beta of 0.1, suggesting that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Question 21

Does the media refer more to YUMC or QSR?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 2 more articles in the media than Yum China. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 6 mentions for Yum China. Yum China's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of 0.76 indicating that Yum China is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Yum China 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Restaurant Brands International 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Question 22

Do analysts recommend QSR or ARMK?

Accepted Answer

Restaurant Brands International presently has a consensus price target of $83.33, indicating a potential upside of 10.24%. Aramark has a consensus price target of $59.21, indicating a potential upside of 1.72%. Given Restaurant Brands International's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Aramark. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Restaurant Brands International 1 Sell rating(s) 8 Hold rating(s) 16 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.60 Aramark 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 11 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.85

Question 23

Is QSR or ARMK a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 91.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Aramark pays out 35.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Aramark has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Question 24

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, QSR or ARMK?

Accepted Answer

Restaurant Brands International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aramark. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Restaurant Brands International $9.43B 2.80 $776M $2.84 26.62 Aramark $18.51B 0.83 $326.39M $1.34 43.44

Question 25

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in QSR or ARMK?

Accepted Answer

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Aramark shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Question 26

Is QSR or ARMK more profitable?

Accepted Answer

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 32.80% beat Aramark's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Restaurant Brands International 9.96% 32.80% 6.67% Aramark 1.84% 17.05% 4.02%

Question 27

Which has more volatility & risk, QSR or ARMK?

Accepted Answer

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Question 28

Does the media favor QSR or ARMK?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 3 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 5 mentions for Aramark. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Aramark's score of 0.71 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Restaurant Brands International 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Aramark 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Question 29

Do analysts recommend HTHT or QSR?

Accepted Answer

H World Group presently has a consensus target price of $61.20, suggesting a potential upside of 49.71%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus target price of $83.33, suggesting a potential upside of 10.24%. Given H World Group's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe H World Group is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score H World Group 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.60 Restaurant Brands International 1 Sell rating(s) 8 Hold rating(s) 16 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.60

Question 30

Is HTHT or QSR a better dividend stock?

Accepted Answer

H World Group pays an annual dividend of $2.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. H World Group pays out 114.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Restaurant Brands International pays out 91.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Restaurant Brands International has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years.

Question 31

Which has higher earnings and valuation, HTHT or QSR?

Accepted Answer

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than H World Group. H World Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio H World Group $3.62B 3.47 $726M $2.23 18.33 Restaurant Brands International $9.43B 2.80 $776M $2.84 26.62

Question 32

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of HTHT or QSR?

Accepted Answer

46.4% of H World Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. 49.4% of H World Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Question 33

Is HTHT or QSR more profitable?

Accepted Answer

H World Group has a net margin of 19.22% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 9.96%. H World Group's return on equity of 39.73% beat Restaurant Brands International's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets H World Group 19.22% 39.73% 7.47% Restaurant Brands International 9.96% 32.80% 6.67%

Question 34

Which has more volatility & risk, HTHT or QSR?

Accepted Answer

H World Group has a beta of 0.13, suggesting that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Question 35

Does the media favor HTHT or QSR?

Accepted Answer

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 6 more articles in the media than H World Group. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 2 mentions for H World Group. H World Group's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of 0.76 indicating that H World Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment H World Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Restaurant Brands International 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Metric	Restaurant Brands International	RETAIL Industry	Retail Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$26.34B	$11.31B	$27.23B	$23.46B
Dividend Yield	3.45%	2.56%	175.38%	4.02%
P/E Ratio	26.62	28.35	21.16	31.06
Price / Sales	2.80	1.74	3.48	19.75
Price / Cash	15.21	14.98	18.18	18.64
Price / Book	5.07	4.84	6.48	4.77
Net Income	$776M	$388.37M	$951.67M	$1.06B
7 Day Performance	3.25%	-0.68%	-1.05%	-0.56%
1 Month Performance	0.80%	0.63%	-1.61%	-0.11%
1 Year Performance	12.23%	-10.84%	-3.83%	16.64%

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
QSR Restaurant Brands International	3.8544 of 5 stars	$75.59 +0.4%	$83.33 +10.2%	+11.8%	$26.34B	$9.43B	26.62	53,500	Gap Down
HLT Hilton Worldwide	4.2268 of 5 stars	$340.99 +0.5%	$349.45 +2.5%	+20.9%	$77.55B	$12.04B	52.01	182,000	News Coverage
IHG Intercontinental Hotels Group	2.1068 of 5 stars	$167.09 +0.4%	$174.50 +4.4%	+37.0%	$24.93B	$5.19B	N/A	13,049
YUMC Yum China	4.611 of 5 stars	$42.43 -0.1%	$59.05 +39.2%	-9.4%	$14.81B	$11.80B	16.26	290,000	Positive News Gap Up
ARMK Aramark	3.1293 of 5 stars	$55.64 -0.7%	$58.29 +4.8%	+33.2%	$14.64B	$18.51B	41.54	278,390	News Coverage Analyst Forecast

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) Competitors

QSR vs. HLT, IHG, YUMC, ARMK, and HTHT

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Hilton Worldwide?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Yum China?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Aramark?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to H World Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

QSR vs. The Competition

Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) Competitors

QSR vs. HLT, IHG, YUMC, ARMK, and HTHT

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Hilton Worldwide?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in HLT or QSR?

Is HLT or QSR more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, HLT or QSR?

Is HLT or QSR a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer HLT or QSR?

Which has better earnings and valuation, HLT or QSR?

Does the media refer more to HLT or QSR?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

Is IHG or QSR more profitable?

Do analysts prefer IHG or QSR?

Which has more risk and volatility, IHG or QSR?

Does the media prefer IHG or QSR?

Is IHG or QSR a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of IHG or QSR?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, IHG or QSR?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Yum China?

Is YUMC or QSR more profitable?

Does the media refer more to YUMC or QSR?

Is YUMC or QSR a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate YUMC or QSR?

Which has more risk & volatility, YUMC or QSR?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in YUMC or QSR?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, YUMC or QSR?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Aramark?

Which has more volatility & risk, QSR or ARMK?

Does the media favor QSR or ARMK?

Is QSR or ARMK a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend QSR or ARMK?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in QSR or ARMK?

Is QSR or ARMK more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, QSR or ARMK?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to H World Group?

Is HTHT or QSR a better dividend stock?

Is HTHT or QSR more profitable?

Do analysts recommend HTHT or QSR?

Does the media favor HTHT or QSR?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of HTHT or QSR?

Which has more volatility & risk, HTHT or QSR?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, HTHT or QSR?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

QSR vs. The Competition

Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools