S&P 500   3,897.71 (-0.11%)
DOW   31,570.49 (+0.11%)
QQQ   322.67 (-0.28%)
AAPL   127.06 (-0.57%)
MSFT   235.40 (-0.65%)
FB   265.35 (+0.17%)
GOOGL   2,081.27 (+0.56%)
TSLA   709.93 (-1.18%)
AMZN   3,147.00 (+0.03%)
NVDA   548.21 (-0.99%)
BABA   240.79 (-0.37%)
CGC   36.03 (+3.74%)
GE   13.09 (-0.15%)
MU   94.10 (-0.70%)
NIO   45.03 (-9.51%)
AMD   85.95 (-0.51%)
T   28.27 (+0.64%)
F   12.09 (+0.92%)
ACB   11.73 (+6.25%)
DIS   196.45 (+0.75%)
BA   223.23 (-0.52%)
NFLX   551.57 (+0.17%)
BAC   35.88 (+0.25%)
S&P 500   3,897.71 (-0.11%)
DOW   31,570.49 (+0.11%)
QQQ   322.67 (-0.28%)
AAPL   127.06 (-0.57%)
MSFT   235.40 (-0.65%)
FB   265.35 (+0.17%)
GOOGL   2,081.27 (+0.56%)
TSLA   709.93 (-1.18%)
AMZN   3,147.00 (+0.03%)
NVDA   548.21 (-0.99%)
BABA   240.79 (-0.37%)
CGC   36.03 (+3.74%)
GE   13.09 (-0.15%)
MU   94.10 (-0.70%)
NIO   45.03 (-9.51%)
AMD   85.95 (-0.51%)
T   28.27 (+0.64%)
F   12.09 (+0.92%)
ACB   11.73 (+6.25%)
DIS   196.45 (+0.75%)
BA   223.23 (-0.52%)
NFLX   551.57 (+0.17%)
BAC   35.88 (+0.25%)
S&P 500   3,897.71 (-0.11%)
DOW   31,570.49 (+0.11%)
QQQ   322.67 (-0.28%)
AAPL   127.06 (-0.57%)
MSFT   235.40 (-0.65%)
FB   265.35 (+0.17%)
GOOGL   2,081.27 (+0.56%)
TSLA   709.93 (-1.18%)
AMZN   3,147.00 (+0.03%)
NVDA   548.21 (-0.99%)
BABA   240.79 (-0.37%)
CGC   36.03 (+3.74%)
GE   13.09 (-0.15%)
MU   94.10 (-0.70%)
NIO   45.03 (-9.51%)
AMD   85.95 (-0.51%)
T   28.27 (+0.64%)
F   12.09 (+0.92%)
ACB   11.73 (+6.25%)
DIS   196.45 (+0.75%)
BA   223.23 (-0.52%)
NFLX   551.57 (+0.17%)
BAC   35.88 (+0.25%)
S&P 500   3,897.71 (-0.11%)
DOW   31,570.49 (+0.11%)
QQQ   322.67 (-0.28%)
AAPL   127.06 (-0.57%)
MSFT   235.40 (-0.65%)
FB   265.35 (+0.17%)
GOOGL   2,081.27 (+0.56%)
TSLA   709.93 (-1.18%)
AMZN   3,147.00 (+0.03%)
NVDA   548.21 (-0.99%)
BABA   240.79 (-0.37%)
CGC   36.03 (+3.74%)
GE   13.09 (-0.15%)
MU   94.10 (-0.70%)
NIO   45.03 (-9.51%)
AMD   85.95 (-0.51%)
T   28.27 (+0.64%)
F   12.09 (+0.92%)
ACB   11.73 (+6.25%)
DIS   196.45 (+0.75%)
BA   223.23 (-0.52%)
NFLX   551.57 (+0.17%)
BAC   35.88 (+0.25%)
Log in
NYSE:QSR

Restaurant Brands International Competitors

$61.64
+0.27 (+0.44 %)
(As of 03/2/2021 09:45 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$61.37
Now: $61.64
$62.78
50-Day Range
$57.11
MA: $60.39
$64.24
52-Week Range
$25.08
Now: $61.64
$64.65
Volume14,977 shs
Average Volume1.68 million shs
Market Capitalization$18.81 billion
P/E Ratio33.50
Dividend Yield3.47%
Beta1.19

Competitors

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) Vs. CMG, YUM, YUMC, DRI, ARMK, and TXRH

Should you be buying QSR stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "eating places" are considered alternatives and competitors to Restaurant Brands International, including Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG), Yum! Brands (YUM), Yum China (YUMC), Darden Restaurants (DRI), Aramark (ARMK), and Texas Roadhouse (TXRH).

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Chipotle Mexican Grill (NYSE:CMG) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Restaurant Brands International and Chipotle Mexican Grill, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Restaurant Brands International161802.68
Chipotle Mexican Grill0131902.59

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus target price of $65.1818, suggesting a potential upside of 5.25%. Chipotle Mexican Grill has a consensus target price of $1,526.9655, suggesting a potential upside of 2.83%. Given Restaurant Brands International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Chipotle Mexican Grill.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

79.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Chipotle Mexican Grill's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International$5.60 billion3.36$643 million$2.7222.66
Chipotle Mexican Grill$5.59 billion7.48$350.16 million$14.05105.69

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than Chipotle Mexican Grill. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chipotle Mexican Grill, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Chipotle Mexican Grill's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Restaurant Brands International11.00%26.67%4.70%
Chipotle Mexican Grill4.08%16.70%5.38%

Risk & Volatility

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chipotle Mexican Grill has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Yum! Brands (NYSE:YUM) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Restaurant Brands International and Yum! Brands, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Restaurant Brands International161802.68
Yum! Brands110602.29

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus target price of $65.1818, suggesting a potential upside of 5.25%. Yum! Brands has a consensus target price of $104.00, suggesting a potential downside of 0.49%. Given Restaurant Brands International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Yum! Brands.

Dividends

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Yum! Brands pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 76.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Yum! Brands pays out 56.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Yum! Brands has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

79.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.2% of Yum! Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Yum! Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Yum! Brands' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International$5.60 billion3.36$643 million$2.7222.66
Yum! Brands$5.60 billion5.60$1.29 billion$3.5529.42

Yum! Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yum! Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Yum! Brands' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Restaurant Brands International11.00%26.67%4.70%
Yum! Brands18.78%-12.42%17.73%

Risk & Volatility

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Yum! Brands has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Yum! Brands on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Restaurant Brands International and Yum China, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Restaurant Brands International161802.68
Yum China02612.89

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus target price of $65.1818, suggesting a potential upside of 5.25%. Yum China has a consensus target price of $57.6750, suggesting a potential downside of 3.08%. Given Restaurant Brands International's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Yum China.

Dividends

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Yum China pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 76.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Yum China pays out 12.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Yum China has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

79.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.6% of Yum China shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Yum China shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Yum China's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International$5.60 billion3.36$643 million$2.7222.66
Yum China$8.78 billion2.83$713 million$1.8831.51

Yum China has higher revenue and earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yum China, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Yum China's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Restaurant Brands International11.00%26.67%4.70%
Yum China6.33%16.35%7.65%

Risk & Volatility

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Yum China has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its share price is 13% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Yum China on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Darden Restaurants (NYSE:DRI) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Restaurant Brands International and Darden Restaurants, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Restaurant Brands International161802.68
Darden Restaurants0102002.67

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus target price of $65.1818, suggesting a potential upside of 5.25%. Darden Restaurants has a consensus target price of $114.1833, suggesting a potential downside of 17.87%. Given Restaurant Brands International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Darden Restaurants.

Dividends

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Darden Restaurants pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 76.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Darden Restaurants pays out 47.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

79.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.4% of Darden Restaurants shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Darden Restaurants shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Darden Restaurants' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International$5.60 billion3.36$643 million$2.7222.66
Darden Restaurants$7.81 billion2.33$-52,400,000.00$3.1344.52

Restaurant Brands International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Darden Restaurants. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Darden Restaurants, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Darden Restaurants' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Restaurant Brands International11.00%26.67%4.70%
Darden Restaurants-1.70%10.47%2.51%

Risk & Volatility

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its share price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Darden Restaurants on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Aramark's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Restaurant Brands International11.00%26.67%4.70%
Aramark-3.60%-1.48%-0.30%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

79.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.5% of Aramark shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.3% of Aramark shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 76.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Aramark pays out -258.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Aramark has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Aramark's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International$5.60 billion3.36$643 million$2.7222.66
Aramark$12.83 billion0.76$-461,530,000.00($0.17)-226.53

Restaurant Brands International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aramark. Aramark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.88, suggesting that its share price is 88% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Restaurant Brands International and Aramark, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Restaurant Brands International161802.68
Aramark09402.31

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus target price of $65.1818, suggesting a potential upside of 5.25%. Aramark has a consensus target price of $31.4167, suggesting a potential downside of 18.48%. Given Restaurant Brands International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Aramark.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Aramark on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Texas Roadhouse (NASDAQ:TXRH) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Texas Roadhouse's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Restaurant Brands International11.00%26.67%4.70%
Texas Roadhouse2.19%5.97%2.60%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

79.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.7% of Texas Roadhouse shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.2% of Texas Roadhouse shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Texas Roadhouse's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International$5.60 billion3.36$643 million$2.7222.66
Texas Roadhouse$2.76 billion2.30$174.45 million$2.4637.07

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than Texas Roadhouse. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Roadhouse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 1, suggesting that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Restaurant Brands International and Texas Roadhouse, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Restaurant Brands International161802.68
Texas Roadhouse116712.32

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus price target of $65.1818, suggesting a potential upside of 5.25%. Texas Roadhouse has a consensus price target of $75.75, suggesting a potential downside of 17.48%. Given Restaurant Brands International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Texas Roadhouse.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Texas Roadhouse on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.


Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Chipotle Mexican Grill logo
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill
1.6$1,484.95+2.9%$41.79 billion$5.59 billion177.63
Yum! Brands logo
YUM
Yum! Brands
2.4$104.44+0.1%$31.36 billion$5.60 billion31.36
Yum China logo
YUMC
Yum China
1.8$59.23+1.0%$25.09 billion$8.78 billion45.21
Darden Restaurants logo
DRI
Darden Restaurants
2.0$139.35+0.2%$18.12 billion$7.81 billion-145.16
Aramark logo
ARMK
Aramark
1.4$38.51+0.2%$9.80 billion$12.83 billion-21.04Gap Down
Texas Roadhouse logo
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse
1.5$91.18+0.7%$6.38 billion$2.76 billion116.90Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Wingstop logo
WING
Wingstop
1.7$138.29+1.4%$4.16 billion$199.68 million144.05
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store logo
CBRL
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store
1.3$159.95+0.4%$3.78 billion$2.52 billion40.29Gap Down
Brinker International logo
EAT
Brinker International
1.6$72.10+0.4%$3.29 billion$3.08 billion126.49Gap Down
Papa John's International logo
PZZA
Papa John's International
1.5$93.79+3.8%$3.09 billion$1.62 billion117.24Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
The Cheesecake Factory logo
CAKE
The Cheesecake Factory
1.3$55.68+0.4%$2.53 billion$2.48 billion-40.94Decrease in Short Interest
Main Street Capital logo
MAIN
Main Street Capital
1.2$36.35+0.1%$2.41 billion$243.37 million-63.77Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Jack in the Box logo
JACK
Jack in the Box
1.9$103.06+1.7%$2.39 billion$1.02 billion26.49
Bloomin' Brands logo
BLMN
Bloomin' Brands
1.8$26.07+0.7%$2.28 billion$4.14 billion-19.03Analyst Upgrade
Gap Down
Dave & Buster's Entertainment logo
PLAY
Dave & Buster's Entertainment
1.5$41.85+0.6%$1.98 billion$1.35 billion-14.84Gap Down
Dine Brands Global logo
DIN
Dine Brands Global
1.5$79.34+2.6%$1.34 billion$910.18 million-17.48
BJ's Restaurants logo
BJRI
BJ's Restaurants
1.3$58.21+4.6%$1.30 billion$1.16 billion-50.62Gap Down
Denny's logo
DENN
Denny's
1.4$17.87+1.8%$1.14 billion$541.39 million111.69Gap Down
Arcos Dorados logo
ARCO
Arcos Dorados
1.4$5.27+4.2%$1.14 billion$2.96 billion-7.76Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Chuy's logo
CHUY
Chuy's
1.3$42.49+3.5%$836.84 million$426.36 million-96.57Upcoming Earnings
Ruth's Hospitality Group logo
RUTH
Ruth's Hospitality Group
1.2$22.94+0.1%$799.56 million$468.03 million-62.00Upcoming Earnings
El Pollo Loco logo
LOCO
El Pollo Loco
1.6$19.30+1.1%$695.77 million$442.33 million30.16
RCI Hospitality logo
RICK
RCI Hospitality
1.5$67.38+2.9%$623.97 million$132.33 million-99.09Dividend Announcement
Decrease in Short Interest
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers logo
RRGB
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers
1.2$30.67+0.1%$476.67 million$1.32 billion-1.65Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
Noodles & Company logo
NDLS
Noodles & Company
1.1$10.30+0.5%$454.81 million$462.41 million-22.39Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
Fiesta Restaurant Group logo
FRGI
Fiesta Restaurant Group
0.9$15.86+3.8%$411.11 million$660.94 million-12.59Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
Del Taco Restaurants logo
TACO
Del Taco Restaurants
2.4$10.80+7.0%$403.11 million$512.95 million-1.89Upcoming Earnings
High Trading Volume
Carrols Restaurant Group logo
TAST
Carrols Restaurant Group
1.3$6.39+3.3%$332.87 million$1.46 billion-14.20Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Gap Down
Biglari logo
BH
Biglari
0.9$139.50+16.0%$317.50 million$668.84 million-0.78Upcoming Earnings
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Down
LiveXLive Media logo
LIVX
LiveXLive Media
1.7$4.21+1.9%$311.73 million$38.66 million-7.26Decrease in Short Interest
Kura Sushi USA logo
KRUS
Kura Sushi USA
1.0$32.86+9.0%$275.10 million$45.17 million-12.17High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Nathan's Famous logo
NATH
Nathan's Famous
1.0$60.70+1.5%$249.78 million$103.32 million20.86Gap Down
The ONE Group Hospitality logo
STKS
The ONE Group Hospitality
1.0$5.33+7.9%$154.93 million$120.68 million14.41
J. Alexander's logo
JAX
J. Alexander's
0.7$9.04+3.2%$135.71 million$247.27 million-5.45
Potbelly logo
PBPB
Potbelly
0.8$5.25+0.6%$127.84 million$409.71 million-2.49
BFI
BurgerFi International
0.0$15.26+0.3%$120.30 millionN/A-89.76Increase in Short Interest
FAT Brands logo
FAT
FAT Brands
0.9$10.08+15.3%$120.15 million$22.50 million-14.60Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Luby's logo
LUB
Luby's
0.7$3.25+1.8%$99.91 million$214.02 million-3.32Decrease in Short Interest
ARKR
Ark Restaurants
0.7$18.98+4.6%$66.85 million$106.49 million-14.16
BBQ
BBQ
0.6$6.00+2.5%$55.70 million$82.27 million9.23Decrease in Short Interest
Good Times Restaurants logo
GTIM
Good Times Restaurants
1.0$3.59+3.6%$45.45 million$109.86 million-3.23Gap Down
This page was last updated on 3/2/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.