Does the media prefer QSR or DASH?

In the previous week, DoorDash had 27 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 41 mentions for DoorDash and 14 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. DoorDash's average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of -0.02 indicating that DoorDash is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Restaurant Brands International 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral DoorDash 8 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 22 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 4 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor YUM or QSR?

In the previous week, Yum! Brands had 2 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Yum! Brands and 14 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Yum! Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of -0.02 indicating that Yum! Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Yum! Brands 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Restaurant Brands International 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to DRI or QSR?

In the previous week, Darden Restaurants had 15 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Darden Restaurants and 14 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Darden Restaurants' average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of -0.02 indicating that Darden Restaurants is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Darden Restaurants 4 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 13 Neutral mention(s) 5 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Restaurant Brands International 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to QSR or ARMK?

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 9 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 5 mentions for Aramark. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of -0.02 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Restaurant Brands International 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Aramark 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) Competitors

$69.75 -1.33 (-1.87%)

Closing price 10/1/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$70.16 +0.40 (+0.58%)

As of 08:53 AM Eastern

Compare

QSR vs. DASH, CMG, YUM, DRI, and ARMK

Should you buy Restaurant Brands International stock or one of its competitors? Restaurant Brands International's main competitors and comparable companies include DoorDash (DASH), Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG), Yum! Brands (YUM), Darden Restaurants (DRI), and Aramark (ARMK). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "restaurants" industry.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to DoorDash?

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and DoorDash (NASDAQ:DASH) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, DoorDash had 27 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 41 mentions for DoorDash and 14 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. DoorDash's average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of -0.02 indicating that DoorDash is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
DoorDash	8 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	22 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	4 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.6% of DoorDash shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 44.9% of DoorDash shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

DoorDash has higher revenue and earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DoorDash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.58	$776M	$3.72	18.75
DoorDash	$13.72B	5.75	$935M	$1.91	95.38

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DoorDash has a beta of 1.9, indicating that its share price is 90% more volatile than the broader market.

Restaurant Brands International presently has a consensus price target of $83.71, indicating a potential upside of 20.01%. DoorDash has a consensus price target of $257.47, indicating a potential upside of 41.33%. Given DoorDash's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe DoorDash is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
DoorDash	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	26 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 13.12% compared to DoorDash's net margin of 5.29%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 33.43% beat DoorDash's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International	13.12%	33.43%	6.94%
DoorDash	5.29%	8.48%	4.37%

Summary

DoorDash beats Restaurant Brands International on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Chipotle Mexican Grill?

Chipotle Mexican Grill (NYSE:CMG) and Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 13.12% compared to Chipotle Mexican Grill's net margin of 11.43%. Chipotle Mexican Grill's return on equity of 54.65% beat Restaurant Brands International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chipotle Mexican Grill	11.43%	54.65%	16.21%
Restaurant Brands International	13.12%	33.43%	6.94%

In the previous week, Chipotle Mexican Grill had 7 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Chipotle Mexican Grill and 14 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Chipotle Mexican Grill's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of -0.02 indicating that Chipotle Mexican Grill is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Chipotle Mexican Grill	7 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Restaurant Brands International	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Chipotle Mexican Grill has higher revenue and earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chipotle Mexican Grill, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chipotle Mexican Grill	$11.93B	3.43	$1.54B	$1.09	29.64
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.58	$776M	$3.72	18.75

91.3% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chipotle Mexican Grill currently has a consensus target price of $43.91, indicating a potential upside of 35.90%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus target price of $83.71, indicating a potential upside of 20.01%. Given Chipotle Mexican Grill's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Chipotle Mexican Grill is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chipotle Mexican Grill	0 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	23 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Chipotle Mexican Grill has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chipotle Mexican Grill beats Restaurant Brands International on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Yum! Brands?

Yum! Brands (NYSE:YUM) and Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Yum! Brands has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Yum! Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Restaurant Brands International. Yum! Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Yum! Brands	$8.21B	4.54	$1.56B	$7.95	17.19
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.58	$776M	$3.72	18.75

Yum! Brands pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Yum! Brands pays out 37.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Yum! Brands has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Yum! Brands had 2 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Yum! Brands and 14 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Yum! Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of -0.02 indicating that Yum! Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Yum! Brands	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Restaurant Brands International	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Yum! Brands has a net margin of 25.42% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 13.12%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 33.43% beat Yum! Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Yum! Brands	25.42%	-24.57%	22.24%
Restaurant Brands International	13.12%	33.43%	6.94%

82.4% of Yum! Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Yum! Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Yum! Brands presently has a consensus price target of $174.11, indicating a potential upside of 27.40%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus price target of $83.71, indicating a potential upside of 20.01%. Given Yum! Brands' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Yum! Brands is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Yum! Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Summary

Yum! Brands beats Restaurant Brands International on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Darden Restaurants?

Darden Restaurants (NYSE:DRI) and Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, Darden Restaurants had 15 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Darden Restaurants and 14 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Darden Restaurants' average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of -0.02 indicating that Darden Restaurants is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Darden Restaurants	4 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	13 Neutral mention(s)	5 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Restaurant Brands International	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 13.12% compared to Darden Restaurants' net margin of 8.85%. Darden Restaurants' return on equity of 58.64% beat Restaurant Brands International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Darden Restaurants	8.85%	58.64%	9.56%
Restaurant Brands International	13.12%	33.43%	6.94%

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Darden Restaurants currently has a consensus target price of $232.38, indicating a potential upside of 17.58%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus target price of $83.71, indicating a potential upside of 20.01%. Given Restaurant Brands International's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Darden Restaurants.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Darden Restaurants	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

93.6% of Darden Restaurants shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Darden Restaurants shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Darden Restaurants has higher revenue and earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Darden Restaurants, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Darden Restaurants	$13.21B	1.71	$1.21B	$10.23	19.32
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.58	$776M	$3.72	18.75

Darden Restaurants pays an annual dividend of $6.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Darden Restaurants pays out 63.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Darden Restaurants has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Restaurant Brands International has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Darden Restaurants beats Restaurant Brands International on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Aramark?

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Aramark pays out 33.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Aramark has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Aramark shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 9 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 5 mentions for Aramark. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of -0.02 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Aramark	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 13.12% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.93%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 33.43% beat Aramark's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International	13.12%	33.43%	6.94%
Aramark	1.93%	17.68%	4.21%

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus price target of $83.71, suggesting a potential upside of 20.01%. Aramark has a consensus price target of $69.14, suggesting a potential upside of 26.79%. Given Aramark's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Aramark is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Aramark	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

Restaurant Brands International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aramark. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.58	$776M	$3.72	18.75
Aramark	$18.51B	0.78	$326.39M	$1.43	38.14

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Aramark on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Restaurant Brands International News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QSR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

QSR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Restaurant Brands International	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$24.79B	$7.18B	$12.26B	$22.64B
Dividend Yield	3.66%	3.98%	69.35%	3.74%
P/E Ratio	18.75	21.02	44.09	27.58
Price / Sales	2.58	336.59	93.04	20.54
Price / Cash	14.36	20.55	28.17	39.56
Price / Book	4.68	4.32	3.92	4.62
Net Income	$776M	$260.40M	$445.63M	$1.08B
7 Day Performance	-2.63%	-0.73%	-0.78%	-1.52%
1 Month Performance	-11.57%	-5.97%	-4.32%	-5.48%
1 Year Performance	3.04%	-9.47%	-7.58%	5.05%

Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
QSR Restaurant Brands International	4.6973 of 5 stars	$69.75 -1.9%	$83.71 +20.0%	+5.6%	$24.79B	$9.43B	18.75	53,500	Positive News Analyst Forecast Options Volume
DASH DoorDash	4.4592 of 5 stars	$185.57 +4.0%	$257.47 +38.7%	-31.9%	$80.44B	$13.72B	97.19	31,400	Trending News Analyst Forecast Insider Trade
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill	4.7485 of 5 stars	$32.14 +0.9%	$43.91 +36.6%	-17.1%	$40.68B	$11.93B	29.49	130,301	Analyst Forecast
YUM Yum! Brands	4.8116 of 5 stars	$137.22 -0.8%	$174.11 +26.9%	-10.7%	$37.44B	$8.21B	17.26	49,000	Analyst Forecast
DRI Darden Restaurants	4.5608 of 5 stars	$195.57 -0.7%	$232.38 +18.8%	+2.7%	$22.32B	$13.21B	19.13	209,931

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:QSR) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) Competitors

QSR vs. DASH, CMG, YUM, DRI, and ARMK

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to DoorDash?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Chipotle Mexican Grill?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Yum! Brands?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Darden Restaurants?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Aramark?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

QSR vs. The Competition

Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) Competitors

QSR vs. DASH, CMG, YUM, DRI, and ARMK

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to DoorDash?

Does the media prefer QSR or DASH?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in QSR or DASH?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, QSR or DASH?

Which has more risk and volatility, QSR or DASH?

Do analysts recommend QSR or DASH?

Is QSR or DASH more profitable?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Chipotle Mexican Grill?

Is CMG or QSR more profitable?

Does the media prefer CMG or QSR?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CMG or QSR?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in CMG or QSR?

Do analysts recommend CMG or QSR?

Which has more volatility and risk, CMG or QSR?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Yum! Brands?

Which has more risk & volatility, YUM or QSR?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, YUM or QSR?

Is YUM or QSR a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor YUM or QSR?

Is YUM or QSR more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in YUM or QSR?

Do analysts recommend YUM or QSR?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Darden Restaurants?

Does the media refer more to DRI or QSR?

Is DRI or QSR more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, DRI or QSR?

Do analysts recommend DRI or QSR?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in DRI or QSR?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, DRI or QSR?

Is DRI or QSR a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Aramark?

Which has more volatility & risk, QSR or ARMK?

Is QSR or ARMK a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in QSR or ARMK?

Does the media refer more to QSR or ARMK?

Is QSR or ARMK more profitable?

Do analysts rate QSR or ARMK?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, QSR or ARMK?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

QSR vs. The Competition

Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools