Does the media refer more to DASH or QSR?

In the previous week, DoorDash had 31 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 43 mentions for DoorDash and 12 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat DoorDash's score of 0.84 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment DoorDash 22 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 11 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Restaurant Brands International 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer QSR or YUM?

In the previous week, Yum! Brands had 4 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Yum! Brands and 12 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Yum! Brands' score of 0.99 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Restaurant Brands International 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Yum! Brands 13 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer DRI or QSR?

In the previous week, Darden Restaurants and Darden Restaurants both had 12 articles in the media. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Darden Restaurants' score of 1.04 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Darden Restaurants 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Restaurant Brands International 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer ARMK or QSR?

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 8 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 4 mentions for Aramark. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 1.70 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of 1.11 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Aramark 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Restaurant Brands International 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) Competitors

$77.07 +0.58 (+0.76%)

Closing price 09/11/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$76.93 -0.14 (-0.19%)

As of 09/11/2026 07:55 PM Eastern

Compare

QSR vs. DASH, CMG, YUM, DRI, and ARMK

Should you buy Restaurant Brands International stock or one of its competitors? Restaurant Brands International's main competitors and comparable companies include DoorDash (DASH), Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG), Yum! Brands (YUM), Darden Restaurants (DRI), and Aramark (ARMK). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "restaurants" industry.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to DoorDash?

DoorDash (NASDAQ:DASH) and Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and profitability.

90.6% of DoorDash shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. 44.9% of DoorDash shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

DoorDash has a beta of 1.79, indicating that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 13.12% compared to DoorDash's net margin of 5.29%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 33.43% beat DoorDash's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
DoorDash	5.29%	8.48%	4.37%
Restaurant Brands International	13.12%	33.43%	6.94%

DoorDash currently has a consensus price target of $257.47, suggesting a potential upside of 27.49%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus price target of $84.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.99%. Given DoorDash's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe DoorDash is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
DoorDash	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	26 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70

In the previous week, DoorDash had 31 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 43 mentions for DoorDash and 12 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat DoorDash's score of 0.84 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
DoorDash	22 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	11 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Restaurant Brands International	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

DoorDash has higher revenue and earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DoorDash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
DoorDash	$15.89B	5.51	$935M	$1.91	105.73
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.85	$776M	$3.72	20.72

Summary

DoorDash beats Restaurant Brands International on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Chipotle Mexican Grill?

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Chipotle Mexican Grill (NYSE:CMG) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Chipotle Mexican Grill has higher revenue and earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chipotle Mexican Grill, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.85	$776M	$3.72	20.72
Chipotle Mexican Grill	$12.42B	3.69	$1.54B	$1.09	33.24

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.3% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Chipotle Mexican Grill shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 13.12% compared to Chipotle Mexican Grill's net margin of 11.43%. Chipotle Mexican Grill's return on equity of 54.65% beat Restaurant Brands International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International	13.12%	33.43%	6.94%
Chipotle Mexican Grill	11.43%	54.65%	16.21%

In the previous week, Chipotle Mexican Grill had 7 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Chipotle Mexican Grill and 12 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Chipotle Mexican Grill's score of 0.88 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Chipotle Mexican Grill	11 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus price target of $84.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.99%. Chipotle Mexican Grill has a consensus price target of $43.84, indicating a potential upside of 20.99%. Given Chipotle Mexican Grill's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Chipotle Mexican Grill is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70
Chipotle Mexican Grill	0 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	23 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chipotle Mexican Grill has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Chipotle Mexican Grill beats Restaurant Brands International on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Yum! Brands?

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Yum! Brands (NYSE:YUM) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus target price of $84.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.99%. Yum! Brands has a consensus target price of $175.24, suggesting a potential upside of 23.90%. Given Yum! Brands' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Yum! Brands is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70
Yum! Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	13 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Yum! Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Yum! Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.85	$776M	$3.72	20.72
Yum! Brands	$8.72B	4.42	$1.56B	$7.95	17.79

In the previous week, Yum! Brands had 4 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Yum! Brands and 12 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Yum! Brands' score of 0.99 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Yum! Brands	13 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Yum! Brands has a net margin of 25.42% compared to Restaurant Brands International's net margin of 13.12%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 33.43% beat Yum! Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International	13.12%	33.43%	6.94%
Yum! Brands	25.42%	-24.57%	22.24%

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yum! Brands has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Yum! Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Yum! Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Yum! Brands pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yum! Brands pays out 37.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Yum! Brands has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Yum! Brands beats Restaurant Brands International on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Darden Restaurants?

Darden Restaurants (NYSE:DRI) and Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

Darden Restaurants has higher revenue and earnings than Restaurant Brands International. Darden Restaurants is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Darden Restaurants	$13.21B	1.81	$1.21B	$10.38	20.21
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.85	$776M	$3.72	20.72

In the previous week, Darden Restaurants and Darden Restaurants both had 12 articles in the media. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Darden Restaurants' score of 1.04 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Darden Restaurants	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Restaurant Brands International	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 13.12% compared to Darden Restaurants' net margin of 9.13%. Darden Restaurants' return on equity of 57.44% beat Restaurant Brands International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Darden Restaurants	9.13%	57.44%	9.62%
Restaurant Brands International	13.12%	33.43%	6.94%

Darden Restaurants currently has a consensus price target of $230.79, suggesting a potential upside of 9.99%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus price target of $84.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.99%. Given Darden Restaurants' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Darden Restaurants is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Darden Restaurants	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	18 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70

93.6% of Darden Restaurants shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Darden Restaurants shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Darden Restaurants pays an annual dividend of $6.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Darden Restaurants pays out 62.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Darden Restaurants has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Darden Restaurants beats Restaurant Brands International on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Aramark?

Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) and Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Restaurant Brands International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aramark. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Aramark	$18.51B	0.83	$326.39M	$1.43	40.93
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.85	$776M	$3.72	20.72

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 8 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 4 mentions for Aramark. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 1.70 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of 1.11 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Aramark	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Restaurant Brands International	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 13.12% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.93%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 33.43% beat Aramark's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Aramark	1.93%	17.68%	4.21%
Restaurant Brands International	13.12%	33.43%	6.94%

Aramark has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Aramark pays out 33.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Aramark has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Aramark presently has a consensus target price of $69.14, indicating a potential upside of 18.14%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus target price of $84.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.99%. Given Aramark's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Aramark is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Aramark	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86
Restaurant Brands International	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Aramark shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Aramark on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Restaurant Brands International News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QSR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

QSR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Restaurant Brands International	Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$26.68B	$7.58B	$12.54B	$23.19B
Dividend Yield	3.40%	3.88%	56.79%	3.56%
P/E Ratio	20.72	21.68	45.65	28.69
Price / Sales	2.85	339.63	91.41	99.85
Price / Cash	15.45	21.67	28.61	33.82
Price / Book	5.17	4.60	4.08	4.74
Net Income	$776M	$262.26M	$445.66M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-3.93%	-2.26%	-2.30%	-1.99%
1 Month Performance	2.79%	-4.67%	-4.00%	-2.68%
1 Year Performance	22.61%	-6.49%	-6.10%	10.45%

Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
QSR Restaurant Brands International	4.2032 of 5 stars	$77.07 +0.8%	$84.00 +9.0%	+21.6%	$26.68B	$9.43B	20.72	53,500	Positive News Insider Trade
DASH DoorDash	4.2568 of 5 stars	$202.41 -4.4%	$256.97 +27.0%	-22.4%	$87.53B	$13.72B	105.77	31,400	Trending News Analyst Forecast Insider Trade
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill	4.7282 of 5 stars	$37.09 +0.3%	$43.84 +18.2%	-6.9%	$46.92B	$11.93B	34.01	131,534
YUM Yum! Brands	4.8994 of 5 stars	$149.73 -0.7%	$174.65 +16.6%	-5.1%	$40.84B	$8.21B	18.82	49,000	Analyst Upgrade
DRI Darden Restaurants	3.9874 of 5 stars	$214.03 -1.3%	$230.50 +7.7%	-1.7%	$24.42B	$13.21B	20.62	209,931	Positive News Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:QSR) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) Competitors

QSR vs. DASH, CMG, YUM, DRI, and ARMK

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to DoorDash?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Chipotle Mexican Grill?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Yum! Brands?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Darden Restaurants?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Aramark?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

QSR vs. The Competition

Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Restaurant Brands International (QSR) Competitors

QSR vs. DASH, CMG, YUM, DRI, and ARMK

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to DoorDash?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of DASH or QSR?

Which has more risk & volatility, DASH or QSR?

Is DASH or QSR more profitable?

Do analysts prefer DASH or QSR?

Does the media refer more to DASH or QSR?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, DASH or QSR?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Chipotle Mexican Grill?

Which has better valuation and earnings, QSR or CMG?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in QSR or CMG?

Is QSR or CMG more profitable?

Does the media refer more to QSR or CMG?

Do analysts prefer QSR or CMG?

Which has more risk & volatility, QSR or CMG?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Yum! Brands?

Do analysts rate QSR or YUM?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, QSR or YUM?

Does the media prefer QSR or YUM?

Is QSR or YUM more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, QSR or YUM?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in QSR or YUM?

Is QSR or YUM a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Darden Restaurants?

Which has better earnings & valuation, DRI or QSR?

Does the media prefer DRI or QSR?

Is DRI or QSR more profitable?

Do analysts prefer DRI or QSR?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in DRI or QSR?

Is DRI or QSR a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk & volatility, DRI or QSR?

Summary

How does Restaurant Brands International compare to Aramark?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, ARMK or QSR?

Does the media prefer ARMK or QSR?

Is ARMK or QSR more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, ARMK or QSR?

Is ARMK or QSR a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend ARMK or QSR?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of ARMK or QSR?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

QSR vs. The Competition

Restaurant Brands International Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools