Core Laboratories (CLB) Competitors

Core Laboratories (NYSE:CLB) and Patterson-UTI Energy (NASDAQ:PTEN) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Is CLB or PTEN a better dividend stock?

Core Laboratories pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Patterson-UTI Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Core Laboratories pays out 6.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out -11.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Patterson-UTI Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CLB or PTEN?

Core Laboratories has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Patterson-UTI Energy. Patterson-UTI Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Core Laboratories, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Core Laboratories	$517.38M	0.93	$31.40M	$0.62	16.59
Patterson-UTI Energy	$5.38B	0.38	-$968.03M	-$2.76	-1.94

Does the media favor CLB or PTEN?

In the previous week, Patterson-UTI Energy had 6 more articles in the media than Core Laboratories. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Patterson-UTI Energy and 0 mentions for Core Laboratories. Patterson-UTI Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat Core Laboratories' score of 0.50 indicating that Patterson-UTI Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Core Laboratories	Positive
Patterson-UTI Energy	Very Positive

Is CLB or PTEN more profitable?

Core Laboratories has a net margin of 5.73% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -21.49%. Core Laboratories' return on equity of 14.15% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Core Laboratories	5.73%	14.15%	6.18%
Patterson-UTI Energy	-21.49%	-1.94%	-1.16%

Which has more volatility and risk, CLB or PTEN?

Core Laboratories has a beta of 1.41, indicating that its share price is 41% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.3, indicating that its share price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Do analysts rate CLB or PTEN?

Core Laboratories presently has a consensus price target of $12.50, suggesting a potential upside of 21.54%. Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $8.27, suggesting a potential upside of 54.49%. Given Patterson-UTI Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more favorable than Core Laboratories.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Core Laboratories	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Patterson-UTI Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.45

Do institutionals and insiders believe in CLB or PTEN?

97.8% of Core Laboratories shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.9% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Core Laboratories shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Patterson-UTI Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Patterson-UTI Energy beats Core Laboratories on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.