CRH (CRH) Competitors

Evercore has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CRH has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

86.2% of Evercore shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of CRH shares are held by institutional investors. 6.1% of Evercore shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of CRH shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Evercore currently has a consensus target price of $366.45, indicating a potential upside of 7.73%. CRH has a consensus target price of $139.54, indicating a potential upside of 23.11%. Given CRH's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CRH is more favorable than Evercore.

Evercore pays an annual dividend of $3.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. CRH pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Evercore pays out 20.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CRH pays out 28.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Evercore has raised its dividend for 18 consecutive years.

In the previous week, CRH had 9 more articles in the media than Evercore. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for CRH and 4 mentions for Evercore. CRH's average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat Evercore's score of 0.51 indicating that CRH is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Evercore has a net margin of 16.33% compared to CRH's net margin of 9.65%. Evercore's return on equity of 39.20% beat CRH's return on equity.

CRH has higher revenue and earnings than Evercore. Evercore is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CRH, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Eagle Materials presently has a consensus price target of $228.82, suggesting a potential upside of 8.35%. CRH has a consensus price target of $139.54, suggesting a potential upside of 23.11%. Given CRH's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CRH is more favorable than Eagle Materials.

Eagle Materials has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CRH has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Eagle Materials pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. CRH pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Eagle Materials pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CRH pays out 28.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, CRH had 4 more articles in the media than Eagle Materials. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for CRH and 9 mentions for Eagle Materials. Eagle Materials' average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat CRH's score of 1.33 indicating that Eagle Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

96.1% of Eagle Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.5% of CRH shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Eagle Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of CRH shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CRH has higher revenue and earnings than Eagle Materials. Eagle Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CRH, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Eagle Materials has a net margin of 18.70% compared to CRH's net margin of 9.65%. Eagle Materials' return on equity of 28.96% beat CRH's return on equity.

CRH presently has a consensus price target of $139.54, suggesting a potential upside of 23.11%. Ingersoll Rand has a consensus price target of $94.71, suggesting a potential upside of 22.28%. Given CRH's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe CRH is more favorable than Ingersoll Rand.

CRH has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its share price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ingersoll Rand has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500.

CRH pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Ingersoll Rand pays an annual dividend of $0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. CRH pays out 28.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ingersoll Rand pays out 5.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, CRH had 2 more articles in the media than Ingersoll Rand. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for CRH and 11 mentions for Ingersoll Rand. CRH's average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat Ingersoll Rand's score of 0.72 indicating that CRH is being referred to more favorably in the media.

62.5% of CRH shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.3% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of CRH shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ingersoll Rand shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CRH has higher revenue and earnings than Ingersoll Rand. CRH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ingersoll Rand, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CRH has a net margin of 9.65% compared to Ingersoll Rand's net margin of 7.54%. CRH's return on equity of 15.37% beat Ingersoll Rand's return on equity.

CRH has higher revenue and earnings than ITT. CRH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ITT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

ITT has a net margin of 10.80% compared to CRH's net margin of 9.65%. ITT's return on equity of 16.83% beat CRH's return on equity.

62.5% of CRH shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.6% of ITT shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of CRH shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of ITT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CRH pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. ITT pays an annual dividend of $1.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. CRH pays out 28.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ITT pays out 25.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ITT has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years.

CRH currently has a consensus price target of $139.54, suggesting a potential upside of 23.11%. ITT has a consensus price target of $234.00, suggesting a potential upside of 12.58%. Given CRH's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CRH is more favorable than ITT.

CRH has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its share price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ITT has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its share price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, ITT had 16 more articles in the media than CRH. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for ITT and 13 mentions for CRH. CRH's average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat ITT's score of 0.73 indicating that CRH is being referred to more favorably in the media.