Camping World (CWH) Competitors

Camping World has a net margin of -1.49% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -2.47%. Brunswick's return on equity of 13.30% beat Camping World's return on equity.

52.5% of Camping World shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.3% of Brunswick shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Camping World shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Brunswick shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Camping World presently has a consensus target price of $15.22, indicating a potential upside of 146.19%. Brunswick has a consensus target price of $87.07, indicating a potential upside of 8.30%. Given Camping World's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Camping World is more favorable than Brunswick.

Camping World pays an annual dividend of $0.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Camping World pays out -24.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brunswick pays out -83.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Camping World has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Brunswick has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Brunswick had 5 more articles in the media than Camping World. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Brunswick and 4 mentions for Camping World. Camping World's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Brunswick's score of 0.35 indicating that Camping World is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Camping World has higher revenue and earnings than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Camping World, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Camping World has a beta of 2.04, indicating that its stock price is 104% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunswick has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Hilton Grand Vacations had 6 more articles in the media than Camping World. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Hilton Grand Vacations and 4 mentions for Camping World. Camping World's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Hilton Grand Vacations' score of 0.19 indicating that Camping World is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Hilton Grand Vacations has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Camping World. Camping World is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hilton Grand Vacations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Camping World has a beta of 2.04, suggesting that its share price is 104% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hilton Grand Vacations has a beta of 1.51, suggesting that its share price is 51% more volatile than the broader market.

Hilton Grand Vacations has a net margin of 3.16% compared to Camping World's net margin of -1.49%. Hilton Grand Vacations' return on equity of 17.62% beat Camping World's return on equity.

Camping World presently has a consensus price target of $15.22, suggesting a potential upside of 146.19%. Hilton Grand Vacations has a consensus price target of $57.22, suggesting a potential upside of 14.56%. Given Camping World's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Camping World is more favorable than Hilton Grand Vacations.

52.5% of Camping World shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.2% of Hilton Grand Vacations shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Camping World shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Hilton Grand Vacations shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

LCI Industries has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Camping World. Camping World is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LCI Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Camping World pays an annual dividend of $0.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. LCI Industries pays an annual dividend of $4.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Camping World pays out -24.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. LCI Industries pays out 56.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Camping World has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and LCI Industries has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Camping World is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

LCI Industries has a net margin of 4.84% compared to Camping World's net margin of -1.49%. LCI Industries' return on equity of 14.03% beat Camping World's return on equity.

Camping World has a beta of 2.04, meaning that its share price is 104% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LCI Industries has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

52.5% of Camping World shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.7% of LCI Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Camping World shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of LCI Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Camping World currently has a consensus price target of $15.22, suggesting a potential upside of 146.19%. LCI Industries has a consensus price target of $142.71, suggesting a potential upside of 31.96%. Given Camping World's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Camping World is more favorable than LCI Industries.

In the previous week, Camping World had 2 more articles in the media than LCI Industries. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Camping World and 2 mentions for LCI Industries. LCI Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat Camping World's score of 0.86 indicating that LCI Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Thor Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Camping World. Camping World is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thor Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Thor Industries has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Camping World has a beta of 2.04, suggesting that its share price is 104% more volatile than the broader market.

Thor Industries pays an annual dividend of $2.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Camping World pays an annual dividend of $0.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Thor Industries pays out 90.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Camping World pays out -24.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Thor Industries has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years and Camping World has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Camping World is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

96.7% of Thor Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.5% of Camping World shares are held by institutional investors. 4.7% of Thor Industries shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Camping World shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Camping World had 2 more articles in the media than Thor Industries. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Camping World and 2 mentions for Thor Industries. Thor Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Camping World's score of 0.86 indicating that Thor Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Thor Industries presently has a consensus target price of $92.44, indicating a potential upside of 21.21%. Camping World has a consensus target price of $15.22, indicating a potential upside of 146.19%. Given Camping World's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Camping World is more favorable than Thor Industries.

Thor Industries has a net margin of 2.67% compared to Camping World's net margin of -1.49%. Thor Industries' return on equity of 5.74% beat Camping World's return on equity.