Healthpeak Properties (DOC) Competitors

Healthpeak Properties logo
$19.56 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 06/18/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$19.85 +0.29 (+1.50%)
As of 06/18/2026 07:27 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

DOC vs. MGEE, ARES, VICI, NMR, and TPL

Should you buy Healthpeak Properties stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Healthpeak Properties with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Healthpeak Properties include MGE Energy (MGEE), Ares Management (ARES), VICI Properties (VICI), Nomura (NMR), and Texas Pacific Land (TPL).

How does Healthpeak Properties compare to MGE Energy?

Healthpeak Properties (NYSE:DOC) and MGE Energy (NASDAQ:MGEE) are related companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, earnings and media sentiment.

MGE Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Healthpeak Properties. MGE Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Healthpeak Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Healthpeak Properties$2.82B4.78$71.35M$0.3261.13
MGE Energy$767.39M3.64$135.89M$3.9019.47

Healthpeak Properties pays an annual dividend of $1.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. MGE Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Healthpeak Properties pays out 381.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MGE Energy pays out 48.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MGE Energy has increased its dividend for 49 consecutive years.

Healthpeak Properties presently has a consensus target price of $19.86, indicating a potential upside of 1.52%. MGE Energy has a consensus target price of $75.50, indicating a potential downside of 0.55%. Given Healthpeak Properties' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Healthpeak Properties is more favorable than MGE Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Healthpeak Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
13 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.19
MGE Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MGE Energy has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

93.6% of Healthpeak Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.6% of MGE Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Healthpeak Properties shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of MGE Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

MGE Energy has a net margin of 18.61% compared to Healthpeak Properties' net margin of 7.73%. MGE Energy's return on equity of 10.94% beat Healthpeak Properties' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Healthpeak Properties7.73% 2.61% 1.09%
MGE Energy 18.61%10.94%4.68%

In the previous week, Healthpeak Properties had 8 more articles in the media than MGE Energy. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Healthpeak Properties and 0 mentions for MGE Energy. Healthpeak Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat MGE Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Healthpeak Properties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Healthpeak Properties Positive
MGE Energy Neutral

Summary

Healthpeak Properties beats MGE Energy on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Healthpeak Properties compare to Ares Management?

Ares Management (NYSE:ARES) and Healthpeak Properties (NYSE:DOC) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

Ares Management has higher revenue and earnings than Healthpeak Properties. Ares Management is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Healthpeak Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ares Management$5.60B7.62$527.36M$2.1560.19
Healthpeak Properties$2.82B4.78$71.35M$0.3261.13

50.0% of Ares Management shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.6% of Healthpeak Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 36.9% of Ares Management shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Healthpeak Properties shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ares Management pays an annual dividend of $5.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Healthpeak Properties pays an annual dividend of $1.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Ares Management pays out 251.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Healthpeak Properties pays out 381.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ares Management has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

Ares Management has a net margin of 10.54% compared to Healthpeak Properties' net margin of 7.73%. Ares Management's return on equity of 22.14% beat Healthpeak Properties' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ares Management10.54% 22.14% 5.58%
Healthpeak Properties 7.73%2.61%1.09%

Ares Management presently has a consensus price target of $162.56, suggesting a potential upside of 25.62%. Healthpeak Properties has a consensus price target of $19.86, suggesting a potential upside of 1.52%. Given Ares Management's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Ares Management is more favorable than Healthpeak Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ares Management
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.79
Healthpeak Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
13 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.19

In the previous week, Ares Management and Ares Management both had 8 articles in the media. Ares Management's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Healthpeak Properties' score of 0.86 indicating that Ares Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ares Management
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Healthpeak Properties
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ares Management has a beta of 1.51, indicating that its share price is 51% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ares Management beats Healthpeak Properties on 16 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Healthpeak Properties compare to VICI Properties?

VICI Properties (NYSE:VICI) and Healthpeak Properties (NYSE:DOC) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, risk, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

VICI Properties pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Healthpeak Properties pays an annual dividend of $1.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. VICI Properties pays out 61.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Healthpeak Properties pays out 381.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. VICI Properties has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. VICI Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

97.7% of VICI Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.6% of Healthpeak Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of VICI Properties shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Healthpeak Properties shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

VICI Properties presently has a consensus target price of $33.15, suggesting a potential upside of 26.15%. Healthpeak Properties has a consensus target price of $19.86, suggesting a potential upside of 1.52%. Given VICI Properties' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe VICI Properties is more favorable than Healthpeak Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
VICI Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.54
Healthpeak Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
13 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.19

VICI Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Healthpeak Properties. VICI Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Healthpeak Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
VICI Properties$4.01B7.01$2.78B$2.929.00
Healthpeak Properties$2.82B4.78$71.35M$0.3261.13

VICI Properties has a beta of 0.65, indicating that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

VICI Properties has a net margin of 76.83% compared to Healthpeak Properties' net margin of 7.73%. VICI Properties' return on equity of 11.05% beat Healthpeak Properties' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
VICI Properties76.83% 11.05% 6.66%
Healthpeak Properties 7.73%2.61%1.09%

In the previous week, VICI Properties had 6 more articles in the media than Healthpeak Properties. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for VICI Properties and 8 mentions for Healthpeak Properties. VICI Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Healthpeak Properties' score of 0.86 indicating that VICI Properties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
VICI Properties
10 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Healthpeak Properties
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

VICI Properties beats Healthpeak Properties on 17 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Healthpeak Properties compare to Nomura?

Nomura (NYSE:NMR) and Healthpeak Properties (NYSE:DOC) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings and profitability.

15.1% of Nomura shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.6% of Healthpeak Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Nomura shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Healthpeak Properties shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Nomura has higher revenue and earnings than Healthpeak Properties. Nomura is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Healthpeak Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nomura$31.61B0.83$2.39B$0.8011.23
Healthpeak Properties$2.82B4.78$71.35M$0.3261.13

Healthpeak Properties has a net margin of 7.73% compared to Nomura's net margin of 7.64%. Nomura's return on equity of 9.70% beat Healthpeak Properties' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nomura7.64% 9.70% 0.59%
Healthpeak Properties 7.73%2.61%1.09%

In the previous week, Healthpeak Properties had 6 more articles in the media than Nomura. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Healthpeak Properties and 2 mentions for Nomura. Nomura's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Healthpeak Properties' score of 0.86 indicating that Nomura is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Nomura
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Healthpeak Properties
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Nomura pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Healthpeak Properties pays an annual dividend of $1.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Nomura pays out 30.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Healthpeak Properties pays out 381.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Healthpeak Properties has a consensus price target of $19.86, indicating a potential upside of 1.52%. Given Healthpeak Properties' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Healthpeak Properties is more favorable than Nomura.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nomura
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Healthpeak Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
13 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.19

Nomura has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Healthpeak Properties beats Nomura on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Healthpeak Properties compare to Texas Pacific Land?

Texas Pacific Land (NYSE:TPL) and Healthpeak Properties (NYSE:DOC) are both large-cap trading companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Healthpeak Properties pays an annual dividend of $1.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Texas Pacific Land pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Healthpeak Properties pays out 381.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Texas Pacific Land has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

Texas Pacific Land has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Healthpeak Properties. Texas Pacific Land is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Healthpeak Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Texas Pacific Land$839.03M29.19$481.38M$7.3048.64
Healthpeak Properties$2.82B4.78$71.35M$0.3261.13

59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.6% of Healthpeak Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Healthpeak Properties shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Texas Pacific Land had 2 more articles in the media than Healthpeak Properties. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Texas Pacific Land and 8 mentions for Healthpeak Properties. Texas Pacific Land's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Healthpeak Properties' score of 0.86 indicating that Texas Pacific Land is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Texas Pacific Land
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Healthpeak Properties
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.03% compared to Healthpeak Properties' net margin of 7.73%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.52% beat Healthpeak Properties' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Texas Pacific Land60.03% 35.52% 31.95%
Healthpeak Properties 7.73%2.61%1.09%

Texas Pacific Land presently has a consensus price target of $639.00, suggesting a potential upside of 79.98%. Healthpeak Properties has a consensus price target of $19.86, suggesting a potential upside of 1.52%. Given Texas Pacific Land's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Texas Pacific Land is more favorable than Healthpeak Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Texas Pacific Land
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Healthpeak Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
13 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.19

Summary

Texas Pacific Land beats Healthpeak Properties on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Healthpeak Properties News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for DOC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding DOC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

DOC vs. The Competition

MetricHealthpeak PropertiesREIT IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$13.49B$9.76B$13.95B$23.20B
Dividend Yield6.24%5.04%5.74%4.06%
P/E Ratio61.1348.8920.2031.61
Price / Sales4.785.16142.44104.16
Price / Cash13.2414.0919.5724.44
Price / Book1.672.062.254.68
Net Income$71.35M$227.95M$1.14B$1.08B
7 Day Performance-5.25%-1.98%-0.37%-0.82%
1 Month Performance-0.33%1.72%0.85%1.07%
1 Year Performance14.35%11.91%22.83%25.02%

Healthpeak Properties Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
DOC
Healthpeak Properties
3.482 of 5 stars
$19.56
flat
$19.86
+1.5%
+14.4%$13.49B$2.82B61.13200
MGEE
MGE Energy
2.4251 of 5 stars
$76.72
-0.1%
$75.50
-1.6%
-14.1%$2.82B$743.65M19.68700
ARES
Ares Management
4.566 of 5 stars
$136.65
+1.0%
$162.56
+19.0%
-22.0%$45.06B$5.60B63.534,250
VICI
VICI Properties
4.8474 of 5 stars
$27.86
-0.5%
$33.38
+19.9%
-18.6%$29.78B$4.01B9.5420
NMR
Nomura
2.9302 of 5 stars
$8.94
+1.4%
N/A+45.5%$26.21B$31.61B11.1727,242

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:DOC) was last updated on 6/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners