Federal Signal (FSS) Competitors

ITT has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Federal Signal has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, ITT had 7 more articles in the media than Federal Signal. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for ITT and 23 mentions for Federal Signal. Federal Signal's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat ITT's score of 0.73 indicating that Federal Signal is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

91.6% of ITT shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Federal Signal shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of ITT shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Federal Signal shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ITT has higher revenue and earnings than Federal Signal. Federal Signal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ITT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

ITT pays an annual dividend of $1.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Federal Signal pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. ITT pays out 25.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Federal Signal pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ITT has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Federal Signal has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. ITT is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Federal Signal has a net margin of 11.56% compared to ITT's net margin of 10.80%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 21.18% beat ITT's return on equity.

ITT currently has a consensus target price of $234.00, suggesting a potential upside of 12.46%. Federal Signal has a consensus target price of $139.25, suggesting a potential upside of 15.45%. Given Federal Signal's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Federal Signal is more favorable than ITT.

Enpro has a beta of 1.56, indicating that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Federal Signal has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Federal Signal had 1 more articles in the media than Enpro. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Federal Signal and 22 mentions for Enpro. Federal Signal's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Enpro's score of 0.47 indicating that Federal Signal is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

98.3% of Enpro shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Federal Signal shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Enpro shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Federal Signal shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Federal Signal has higher revenue and earnings than Enpro. Federal Signal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enpro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Enpro pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Federal Signal pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Enpro pays out 63.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Federal Signal pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enpro has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Federal Signal has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Federal Signal is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Federal Signal has a net margin of 11.56% compared to Enpro's net margin of 3.70%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 21.18% beat Enpro's return on equity.

Enpro currently has a consensus target price of $315.00, suggesting a potential upside of 4.88%. Federal Signal has a consensus target price of $139.25, suggesting a potential upside of 15.45%. Given Federal Signal's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Federal Signal is more favorable than Enpro.

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Parker-Hannifin has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Parker-Hannifin has a net margin of 16.58% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of 11.56%. Parker-Hannifin's return on equity of 27.97% beat Federal Signal's return on equity.

92.7% of Federal Signal shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Federal Signal shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Parker-Hannifin shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Federal Signal presently has a consensus target price of $139.25, indicating a potential upside of 15.45%. Parker-Hannifin has a consensus target price of $1,010.45, indicating a potential upside of 13.92%. Given Federal Signal's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Federal Signal is more favorable than Parker-Hannifin.

Federal Signal pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Parker-Hannifin pays an annual dividend of $8.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Federal Signal pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Parker-Hannifin pays out 29.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Federal Signal has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Parker-Hannifin has raised its dividend for 70 consecutive years. Parker-Hannifin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Parker-Hannifin has higher revenue and earnings than Federal Signal. Federal Signal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Parker-Hannifin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Parker-Hannifin had 15 more articles in the media than Federal Signal. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Parker-Hannifin and 23 mentions for Federal Signal. Parker-Hannifin's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Federal Signal's score of 0.87 indicating that Parker-Hannifin is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Terex has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its share price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Federal Signal has a net margin of 11.56% compared to Terex's net margin of 1.87%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 21.18% beat Terex's return on equity.

92.7% of Federal Signal shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.9% of Terex shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Federal Signal shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Terex shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Federal Signal presently has a consensus target price of $139.25, indicating a potential upside of 15.45%. Terex has a consensus target price of $70.82, indicating a potential upside of 12.76%. Given Federal Signal's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Federal Signal is more favorable than Terex.

Federal Signal pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Terex pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Federal Signal pays out 13.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Terex pays out 32.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Federal Signal has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Terex has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Terex is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Federal Signal has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Terex. Federal Signal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Terex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Federal Signal had 4 more articles in the media than Terex. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Federal Signal and 19 mentions for Terex. Federal Signal's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Terex's score of 0.53 indicating that Federal Signal is being referred to more favorably in the media.