Go Pro
→ Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free MIN Stock Alerts

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) Competitors

MFS Intermediate Income Trust logo
$2.45 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 08/28/2026 03:57 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$2.45 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 03:59 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

MIN vs. TYG, VRTS, RHLD, FSCO, and TIGR

Should you buy MFS Intermediate Income Trust stock or one of its competitors? MFS Intermediate Income Trust's main competitors and comparable companies include Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (TYG), Virtus Investment Partners (VRTS), Resolute Holdings Management (RHLD), FS Credit Opportunities (FSCO), and UP Fintech (TIGR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure?

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (NYSE:TYG) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

In the previous week, Tortoise Energy Infrastructure had 3 more articles in the media than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure and 1 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's score of 1.41 indicating that Tortoise Energy Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

32.5% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tortoise Energy InfrastructureN/A N/A N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, meaning that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tortoise Energy InfrastructureN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of $5.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.6%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%.

Summary

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 5 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Virtus Investment Partners?

Virtus Investment Partners (NASDAQ:VRTS) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Virtus Investment Partners has a net margin of 13.42% compared to MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Virtus Investment Partners' return on equity of 21.56% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Virtus Investment Partners13.42% 21.56% 5.27%
MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

Virtus Investment Partners has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Virtus Investment Partners$819.58M1.36$121.75M$17.559.58
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Virtus Investment Partners has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, meaning that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

Virtus Investment Partners pays an annual dividend of $9.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. Virtus Investment Partners pays out 55.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Virtus Investment Partners had 6 more articles in the media than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Virtus Investment Partners and 1 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Virtus Investment Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.65 beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's score of 1.41 indicating that Virtus Investment Partners is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Virtus Investment Partners
7 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Virtus Investment Partners presently has a consensus price target of $145.50, indicating a potential downside of 13.45%. Given Virtus Investment Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Virtus Investment Partners is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Virtus Investment Partners
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

80.5% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.4% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Virtus Investment Partners beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Resolute Holdings Management?

Resolute Holdings Management (NYSE:RHLD) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 52.8% of Resolute Holdings Management shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Resolute Holdings Management has a net margin of 4.21% compared to MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Resolute Holdings Management's return on equity of 3.55% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Resolute Holdings Management4.21% 3.55% 1.71%
MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Resolute Holdings Management
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Resolute Holdings Management has a beta of -1.29, meaning that its share price is 229% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, meaning that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Resolute Holdings Management.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Resolute Holdings Management$462.05M2.29-$5.92M$5.4324.96
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Resolute Holdings Management had 11 more articles in the media than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Resolute Holdings Management and 1 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Resolute Holdings Management's average media sentiment score of 1.48 beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's score of 1.41 indicating that Resolute Holdings Management is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Resolute Holdings Management
9 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Resolute Holdings Management beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to FS Credit Opportunities?

FS Credit Opportunities (NYSE:FSCO) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

FS Credit Opportunities pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.5%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%.

FS Credit Opportunities has a beta of 0.33, indicating that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FS Credit OpportunitiesN/A N/A N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

36.4% of FS Credit Opportunities shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of FS Credit Opportunities shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FS Credit Opportunities$137.77M7.60N/AN/AN/A
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust had 1 more articles in the media than FS Credit Opportunities. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust and 0 mentions for FS Credit Opportunities. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat FS Credit Opportunities' score of 0.00 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
FS Credit Opportunities Neutral
MFS Intermediate Income Trust Positive

Summary

FS Credit Opportunities beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to UP Fintech?

UP Fintech (NASDAQ:TIGR) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends and media sentiment.

UP Fintech has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
UP Fintech$612.07M1.57$170.90M$0.598.56
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

UP Fintech has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, meaning that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

UP Fintech has a net margin of 16.22% compared to MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. UP Fintech's return on equity of 13.11% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
UP Fintech16.22% 13.11% 1.23%
MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, UP Fintech had 15 more articles in the media than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for UP Fintech and 1 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat UP Fintech's score of 0.60 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
UP Fintech
3 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

9.0% of UP Fintech shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

UP Fintech currently has a consensus target price of $8.16, indicating a potential upside of 61.53%. Given UP Fintech's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe UP Fintech is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
UP Fintech
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

UP Fintech beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get MFS Intermediate Income Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MIN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MIN vs. The Competition

Export
MetricMFS Intermediate Income TrustCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$278.81M$5.71B$14.01B$24.13B
Dividend Yield9.46%7.39%5.88%3.72%
P/E RatioN/A32.7026.7430.01
Price / SalesN/A1,243.25518.0016.90
Price / CashN/A48.1530.4019.75
Price / BookN/A3.762.854.84
Net IncomeN/A$417.39M$1.31B$1.07B
7 Day Performance0.20%0.69%0.27%-0.41%
1 Month Performance1.87%2.27%2.54%2.04%
1 Year Performance-8.41%6.00%10.76%13.37%

MFS Intermediate Income Trust Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MIN
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
N/A$2.45
flat		N/A-8.4%$278.81MN/AN/AN/A
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure
N/A$43.39
+0.3%		N/A+1.9%$1.10B$158.88MN/AN/A
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners
3.2959 of 5 stars		$166.44
+0.1%		$145.50
-12.6%		-16.5%$1.10B$819.58M9.85770
RHLD
Resolute Holdings Management
1.0993 of 5 stars		$133.22
-7.9%		N/A+105.1%$1.04B$462.05M24.535,620
FSCO
FS Credit Opportunities
N/A$5.12
+0.9%		N/A-30.9%$1.03B$163.59MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MIN) was last updated on 8/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel