Which has preferable valuation and earnings, OCSL or MIN?

Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Oaktree Specialty Lending $316.80M 3.61 $33.92M $0.48 27.04 MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Which has better valuation & earnings, VRTS or MIN?

Virtus Investment Partners has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Virtus Investment Partners $819.58M 1.37 $121.75M $17.55 9.63 MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts prefer ASA or MIN?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score ASA Gold and Precious Metals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 MFS Intermediate Income Trust 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, ASA or MIN?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ASA Gold and Precious Metals N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Is ASA or MIN more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ASA Gold and Precious Metals N/A N/A N/A MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, MIN or TYG?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tortoise Energy Infrastructure N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Is MIN or TYG more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A Tortoise Energy Infrastructure N/A N/A N/A

Does the media prefer MIN or TYG?

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust and MFS Intermediate Income Trust both had 2 articles in the media. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's score of -1.00 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment MFS Intermediate Income Trust 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Tortoise Energy Infrastructure 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Negative

Do analysts recommend MIN or GSBD?

Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus price target of $8.75, indicating a potential downside of 11.21%. Given Goldman Sachs BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score MFS Intermediate Income Trust 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Goldman Sachs BDC 3 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.57

Which has better earnings and valuation, MIN or GSBD?

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Goldman Sachs BDC $365.57M 3.03 $119.27M $0.52 18.95

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) Competitors

$2.48 -0.01 (-0.20%)

Closing price 08/14/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$2.48 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 08/14/2026 07:34 PM Eastern

Compare

MIN vs. OCSL, VRTS, ASA, TYG, and GSBD

Should you buy MFS Intermediate Income Trust stock or one of its competitors? MFS Intermediate Income Trust's main competitors and comparable companies include Oaktree Specialty Lending (OCSL), Virtus Investment Partners (VRTS), ASA Gold and Precious Metals (ASA), Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (TYG), and Goldman Sachs BDC (GSBD). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Oaktree Specialty Lending (NASDAQ:OCSL) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oaktree Specialty Lending	$316.80M	3.61	$33.92M	$0.48	27.04
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Oaktree Specialty Lending had 4 more articles in the media than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Oaktree Specialty Lending and 2 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's score of 0.46 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Oaktree Specialty Lending	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Oaktree Specialty Lending currently has a consensus target price of $11.83, suggesting a potential downside of 8.83%. Given Oaktree Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Oaktree Specialty Lending	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 14.45% compared to MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 9.70% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oaktree Specialty Lending	14.45%	9.70%	4.64%
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A

Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, suggesting that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Oaktree Specialty Lending beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Virtus Investment Partners?

Virtus Investment Partners (NASDAQ:VRTS) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, earnings and risk.

Virtus Investment Partners has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, suggesting that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

Virtus Investment Partners presently has a consensus target price of $145.50, indicating a potential downside of 13.90%. Given Virtus Investment Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Virtus Investment Partners is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Virtus Investment Partners	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.80
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Virtus Investment Partners pays an annual dividend of $9.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Virtus Investment Partners pays out 54.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Virtus Investment Partners had 1 more articles in the media than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Virtus Investment Partners and 2 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Virtus Investment Partners' score of 0.10 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Virtus Investment Partners	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Virtus Investment Partners has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Virtus Investment Partners	$819.58M	1.37	$121.75M	$17.55	9.63
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

80.5% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.4% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Virtus Investment Partners has a net margin of 13.42% compared to MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Virtus Investment Partners' return on equity of 21.56% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Virtus Investment Partners	13.42%	21.56%	5.27%
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Virtus Investment Partners beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to ASA Gold and Precious Metals?

ASA Gold and Precious Metals (NYSE:ASA) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of ASA Gold and Precious Metals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ASA Gold and Precious Metals has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, suggesting that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ASA Gold and Precious Metals	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, ASA Gold and Precious Metals had 4 more articles in the media than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for ASA Gold and Precious Metals and 2 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat ASA Gold and Precious Metals' score of 0.43 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ASA Gold and Precious Metals	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ASA Gold and Precious Metals	N/A	N/A	N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A

ASA Gold and Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ASA Gold and Precious Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

ASA Gold and Precious Metals beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure?

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (NYSE:TYG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and media sentiment.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, suggesting that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of $5.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.1%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure	N/A	N/A	N/A

50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.5% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust and MFS Intermediate Income Trust both had 2 articles in the media. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's score of -1.00 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

Summary

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) and Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Goldman Sachs BDC	$365.57M	3.03	$119.27M	$0.52	18.95

Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus price target of $8.75, indicating a potential downside of 11.21%. Given Goldman Sachs BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Goldman Sachs BDC	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.57

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 17.19% compared to MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 11.04% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A
Goldman Sachs BDC	17.19%	11.04%	4.62%

50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Goldman Sachs BDC. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust and 0 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Goldman Sachs BDC's score of 0.00 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	Positive
Goldman Sachs BDC	Neutral

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.0%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 246.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Goldman Sachs BDC beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get MFS Intermediate Income Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MIN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	MFS Intermediate Income Trust	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$281.66M	$5.67B	$14.07B	$24.27B
Dividend Yield	9.32%	7.39%	5.87%	3.69%
P/E Ratio	N/A	38.25	29.38	30.85
Price / Sales	N/A	1,249.03	518.41	21.30
Price / Cash	N/A	48.28	30.42	20.48
Price / Book	N/A	3.76	2.86	4.95
Net Income	N/A	$416.54M	$1.31B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	1.43%	0.63%	0.98%	0.91%
1 Month Performance	0.41%	1.59%	1.89%	3.27%
1 Year Performance	-7.99%	6.65%	12.08%	19.10%

MFS Intermediate Income Trust Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MIN MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	$2.48 -0.2%	N/A	-8.0%	$281.66M	N/A	N/A	N/A	Positive News Dividend Announcement
OCSL Oaktree Specialty Lending	2.2007 of 5 stars	$12.71 -0.8%	$11.83 -6.9%	-3.8%	$1.12B	$53.53M	26.48	N/A	Analyst Upgrade
VRTS Virtus Investment Partners	3.0767 of 5 stars	$166.00 -0.4%	$145.50 -12.3%	-13.1%	$1.11B	$819.58M	9.82	770
ASA ASA Gold and Precious Metals	1.3274 of 5 stars	$58.45 +0.2%	N/A	+70.6%	$1.10B	N/A	N/A	1,100
TYG Tortoise Energy Infrastructure	N/A	$42.88 +0.2%	N/A	+2.4%	$1.09B	N/A	N/A	N/A	News Coverage Negative News Short Interest Increase

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MIN) was last updated on 8/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) Competitors

MIN vs. OCSL, VRTS, ASA, TYG, and GSBD

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Virtus Investment Partners?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to ASA Gold and Precious Metals?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MIN vs. The Competition

MFS Intermediate Income Trust Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) Competitors

MIN vs. OCSL, VRTS, ASA, TYG, and GSBD

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, OCSL or MIN?

Does the media refer more to OCSL or MIN?

Do analysts recommend OCSL or MIN?

Is OCSL or MIN more profitable?

Is OCSL or MIN a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, OCSL or MIN?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in OCSL or MIN?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Virtus Investment Partners?

Which has more risk & volatility, VRTS or MIN?

Do analysts recommend VRTS or MIN?

Is VRTS or MIN a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to VRTS or MIN?

Which has better valuation & earnings, VRTS or MIN?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in VRTS or MIN?

Is VRTS or MIN more profitable?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to ASA Gold and Precious Metals?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of ASA or MIN?

Which has more risk & volatility, ASA or MIN?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, ASA or MIN?

Does the media prefer ASA or MIN?

Is ASA or MIN more profitable?

Is ASA or MIN a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer ASA or MIN?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure?

Which has more risk & volatility, MIN or TYG?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, MIN or TYG?

Is MIN or TYG a better dividend stock?

Is MIN or TYG more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MIN or TYG?

Does the media prefer MIN or TYG?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Which has better earnings and valuation, MIN or GSBD?

Do analysts recommend MIN or GSBD?

Is MIN or GSBD more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in MIN or GSBD?

Does the media refer more to MIN or GSBD?

Which has more volatility and risk, MIN or GSBD?

Is MIN or GSBD a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MIN vs. The Competition

MFS Intermediate Income Trust Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools