Do analysts prefer MIN or GSBD?

Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus target price of $8.50, suggesting a potential downside of 1.31%. Given Goldman Sachs BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score MFS Intermediate Income Trust 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Goldman Sachs BDC 3 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.57

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, MIN or GSBD?

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio MFS Intermediate Income Trust $11.49M 23.82 N/A N/A N/A Goldman Sachs BDC $86.61M 11.19 $119.27M $0.65 13.25

Does the media prefer MIN or GSBD?

In the previous week, Goldman Sachs BDC had 2 more articles in the media than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC and 3 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.64 beat Goldman Sachs BDC's score of 0.79 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment MFS Intermediate Income Trust 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Goldman Sachs BDC 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer ASA or MIN?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score ASA Gold and Precious Metals 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 MFS Intermediate Income Trust 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, ASA or MIN?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ASA Gold and Precious Metals N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A MFS Intermediate Income Trust $11.49M 23.82 N/A N/A N/A

Is ASA or MIN more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ASA Gold and Precious Metals N/A N/A N/A MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

Which has better valuation and earnings, MIN or MYN?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio MFS Intermediate Income Trust $11.49M 23.82 N/A N/A N/A BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Is MIN or MYN more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund N/A N/A N/A

Does the media favor MIN or MYN?

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust and MFS Intermediate Income Trust both had 3 articles in the media. BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.65 beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's score of 1.64 indicating that BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment MFS Intermediate Income Trust 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Which has higher earnings & valuation, NXP or MIN?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Nuveen Sl Tfip N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A MFS Intermediate Income Trust $11.49M 23.82 N/A N/A N/A

Is NXP or MIN more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Nuveen Sl Tfip N/A N/A N/A MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

Does the media prefer NXP or MIN?

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Nuveen Sl Tfip. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust and 1 mentions for Nuveen Sl Tfip. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.64 beat Nuveen Sl Tfip's score of 0.67 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Nuveen Sl Tfip 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive MFS Intermediate Income Trust 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Do analysts prefer BBDC or MIN?

Barings Bdc presently has a consensus target price of $9.50, indicating a potential upside of 15.36%. Given Barings Bdc's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Barings Bdc is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Barings Bdc 0 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.20 MFS Intermediate Income Trust 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, BBDC or MIN?

Barings Bdc has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Barings Bdc $101.66M 8.48 $101.92M $0.85 9.69 MFS Intermediate Income Trust $11.49M 23.82 N/A N/A N/A

Does the media favor BBDC or MIN?

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Barings Bdc. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust and 1 mentions for Barings Bdc. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.64 beat Barings Bdc's score of 0.00 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Barings Bdc 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral MFS Intermediate Income Trust 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) Competitors

$2.40 -0.01 (-0.21%)

Closing price 07/31/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$2.41 +0.01 (+0.21%)

As of 07/31/2026 07:34 PM Eastern

Compare

MIN vs. GSBD, ASA, MYN, NXP, and BBDC

Should you buy MFS Intermediate Income Trust stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares MFS Intermediate Income Trust with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with MFS Intermediate Income Trust include Goldman Sachs BDC (GSBD), ASA Gold and Precious Metals (ASA), BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (MYN), Nuveen Sl Tfip (NXP), and Barings Bdc (BBDC). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) and Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a consensus target price of $8.50, suggesting a potential downside of 1.31%. Given Goldman Sachs BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Goldman Sachs BDC	3 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.57

MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.9%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 196.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Goldman Sachs BDC had 2 more articles in the media than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC and 3 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.64 beat Goldman Sachs BDC's score of 0.79 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Goldman Sachs BDC	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 21.32% compared to MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 10.94% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A
Goldman Sachs BDC	21.32%	10.94%	4.66%

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, meaning that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	$11.49M	23.82	N/A	N/A	N/A
Goldman Sachs BDC	$86.61M	11.19	$119.27M	$0.65	13.25

Summary

Goldman Sachs BDC beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to ASA Gold and Precious Metals?

ASA Gold and Precious Metals (NYSE:ASA) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and earnings.

In the previous week, ASA Gold and Precious Metals had 2 more articles in the media than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for ASA Gold and Precious Metals and 3 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.64 beat ASA Gold and Precious Metals' score of 0.94 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ASA Gold and Precious Metals	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

ASA Gold and Precious Metals has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ASA Gold and Precious Metals	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	$11.49M	23.82	N/A	N/A	N/A

ASA Gold and Precious Metals pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ASA Gold and Precious Metals	N/A	N/A	N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A

50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of ASA Gold and Precious Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ASA Gold and Precious Metals	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

ASA Gold and Precious Metals beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund?

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) and BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (NYSE:MYN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.3% of BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	$11.49M	23.82	N/A	N/A	N/A
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust and MFS Intermediate Income Trust both had 3 articles in the media. BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.65 beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's score of 1.64 indicating that BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, suggesting that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%. BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.41 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

MFS Intermediate Income Trust and BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund tied by winning 3 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Nuveen Sl Tfip?

Nuveen Sl Tfip (NYSE:NXP) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nuveen Sl Tfip	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	$11.49M	23.82	N/A	N/A	N/A

Nuveen Sl Tfip has a beta of 0.35, meaning that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, meaning that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nuveen Sl Tfip	N/A	N/A	N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A

Nuveen Sl Tfip pays an annual dividend of $0.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%.

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Nuveen Sl Tfip. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust and 1 mentions for Nuveen Sl Tfip. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.64 beat Nuveen Sl Tfip's score of 0.67 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Nuveen Sl Tfip	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

16.2% of Nuveen Sl Tfip shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Nuveen Sl Tfip shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

MFS Intermediate Income Trust beats Nuveen Sl Tfip on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Barings Bdc?

Barings Bdc (NYSE:BBDC) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Barings Bdc. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust and 1 mentions for Barings Bdc. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.64 beat Barings Bdc's score of 0.00 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Barings Bdc	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Barings Bdc presently has a consensus target price of $9.50, indicating a potential upside of 15.36%. Given Barings Bdc's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Barings Bdc is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Barings Bdc	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Barings Bdc pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.6%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%. Barings Bdc pays out 122.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Barings Bdc has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Barings Bdc is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Barings Bdc has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Barings Bdc	$101.66M	8.48	$101.92M	$0.85	9.69
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	$11.49M	23.82	N/A	N/A	N/A

Barings Bdc has a net margin of 32.45% compared to MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Barings Bdc's return on equity of 10.08% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Barings Bdc	32.45%	10.08%	4.33%
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A

Barings Bdc has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

44.1% of Barings Bdc shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Barings Bdc shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Barings Bdc beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get MFS Intermediate Income Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MIN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	MFS Intermediate Income Trust	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$273.68M	$5.46B	$13.87B	$23.67B
Dividend Yield	9.63%	7.50%	5.95%	4.22%
P/E Ratio	N/A	36.79	28.68	31.00
Price / Sales	23.82	1,128.00	467.83	19.22
Price / Cash	N/A	84.88	44.50	18.73
Price / Book	N/A	3.69	3.68	4.76
Net Income	N/A	$417.14M	$1.31B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	0.42%	7.86%	3.70%	-0.34%
1 Month Performance	-2.43%	-1.16%	0.13%	-0.53%
1 Year Performance	-10.26%	5.77%	13.07%	19.19%

MFS Intermediate Income Trust Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MIN MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	$2.41 -0.2%	N/A	-10.3%	$273.68M	$11.49M	N/A	N/A	Positive News
GSBD Goldman Sachs BDC	2.9264 of 5 stars	$8.97 +1.0%	$8.50 -5.2%	-22.1%	$1.01B	$365.57M	13.79	N/A	Upcoming Earnings
ASA ASA Gold and Precious Metals	2.1046 of 5 stars	$49.51 -1.2%	N/A	+55.7%	$930.46M	N/A	N/A	1,100	Short Interest Decrease Gap Up
MYN BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund	N/A	$9.84 +0.4%	N/A	+4.4%	$926.14M	N/A	N/A	N/A	Positive News
NXP Nuveen Sl Tfip	N/A	$14.28 +0.1%	N/A	+1.9%	$899.93M	N/A	N/A	40,400

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MIN) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) Competitors

MIN vs. GSBD, ASA, MYN, NXP, and BBDC

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to ASA Gold and Precious Metals?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Nuveen Sl Tfip?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Barings Bdc?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MIN vs. The Competition

MFS Intermediate Income Trust Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) Competitors

MIN vs. GSBD, ASA, MYN, NXP, and BBDC

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Do analysts prefer MIN or GSBD?

Is MIN or GSBD a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MIN or GSBD?

Does the media prefer MIN or GSBD?

Is MIN or GSBD more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, MIN or GSBD?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, MIN or GSBD?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to ASA Gold and Precious Metals?

Does the media prefer ASA or MIN?

Which has more risk and volatility, ASA or MIN?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, ASA or MIN?

Is ASA or MIN a better dividend stock?

Is ASA or MIN more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of ASA or MIN?

Do analysts prefer ASA or MIN?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MIN or MYN?

Which has better valuation and earnings, MIN or MYN?

Does the media favor MIN or MYN?

Which has more volatility & risk, MIN or MYN?

Is MIN or MYN a better dividend stock?

Is MIN or MYN more profitable?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Nuveen Sl Tfip?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, NXP or MIN?

Which has more risk & volatility, NXP or MIN?

Is NXP or MIN more profitable?

Is NXP or MIN a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer NXP or MIN?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in NXP or MIN?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Barings Bdc?

Does the media favor BBDC or MIN?

Do analysts prefer BBDC or MIN?

Is BBDC or MIN a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, BBDC or MIN?

Is BBDC or MIN more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, BBDC or MIN?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of BBDC or MIN?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MIN vs. The Competition

MFS Intermediate Income Trust Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools