Do analysts rate MIN or OCSL?

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $11.83, indicating a potential upside of 2.01%. Given Oaktree Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score MFS Intermediate Income Trust 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Oaktree Specialty Lending 1 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.83

Which has better earnings & valuation, MIN or OCSL?

Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Oaktree Specialty Lending $316.80M 3.23 $33.92M $0.48 24.17

Does the media prefer MIN or OCSL?

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust and MFS Intermediate Income Trust both had 3 articles in the media. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's score of 0.70 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment MFS Intermediate Income Trust 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Oaktree Specialty Lending 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, MIN or FSCO?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A FS Credit Opportunities $137.77M 7.35 N/A N/A N/A

Is MIN or FSCO more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A FS Credit Opportunities N/A N/A N/A

Does the media favor MIN or FSCO?

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust had 2 more articles in the media than FS Credit Opportunities. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust and 1 mentions for FS Credit Opportunities. FS Credit Opportunities' average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's score of 0.90 indicating that FS Credit Opportunities is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment MFS Intermediate Income Trust 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive FS Credit Opportunities 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Do analysts prefer ORC or MIN?

Orchid Island Capital presently has a consensus target price of $7.50, suggesting a potential upside of 47.78%. Given Orchid Island Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Orchid Island Capital is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Orchid Island Capital 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67 MFS Intermediate Income Trust 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has better valuation & earnings, ORC or MIN?

Orchid Island Capital has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Orchid Island Capital $414M 2.45 $159.03M $1.48 3.43 MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Is ORC or MIN more profitable?

Orchid Island Capital's return on equity of 11.87% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Orchid Island Capital N/A 11.87% 1.35% MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts prefer GSBD or MIN?

Goldman Sachs BDC currently has a consensus price target of $8.75, indicating a potential downside of 0.06%. Given Goldman Sachs BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Goldman Sachs BDC 3 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.86 MFS Intermediate Income Trust 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has better valuation & earnings, GSBD or MIN?

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Goldman Sachs BDC $365.57M 2.70 $119.27M $0.52 16.84 MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Does the media refer more to GSBD or MIN?

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Goldman Sachs BDC. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust and 1 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Goldman Sachs BDC's score of 0.71 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Goldman Sachs BDC 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive MFS Intermediate Income Trust 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation & earnings, TYG or MIN?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Tortoise Energy Infrastructure N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Is TYG or MIN more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Tortoise Energy Infrastructure N/A N/A N/A MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) Competitors

$13.79 +0.01 (+0.04%)

Closing price 10/9/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$13.75 -0.04 (-0.25%)

As of 07:59 AM Eastern

Compare

MIN vs. OCSL, FSCO, ORC, GSBD, and TYG

Should you buy MFS Intermediate Income Trust stock or one of its competitors? MFS Intermediate Income Trust's main competitors and comparable companies include Oaktree Specialty Lending (OCSL), FS Credit Opportunities (FSCO), Orchid Island Capital (ORC), Goldman Sachs BDC (GSBD), and Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (TYG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) and Oaktree Specialty Lending (NASDAQ:OCSL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.28, suggesting that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 14.45% compared to MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 9.70% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A
Oaktree Specialty Lending	14.45%	9.70%	4.64%

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $11.83, indicating a potential upside of 2.01%. Given Oaktree Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Oaktree Specialty Lending	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.83

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust and MFS Intermediate Income Trust both had 3 articles in the media. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's score of 0.70 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Oaktree Specialty Lending	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Oaktree Specialty Lending	$316.80M	3.23	$33.92M	$0.48	24.17

50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Oaktree Specialty Lending beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to FS Credit Opportunities?

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) and FS Credit Opportunities (NYSE:FSCO) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.4% of FS Credit Opportunities shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of FS Credit Opportunities shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A
FS Credit Opportunities	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust had 2 more articles in the media than FS Credit Opportunities. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust and 1 mentions for FS Credit Opportunities. FS Credit Opportunities' average media sentiment score of 1.81 beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's score of 0.90 indicating that FS Credit Opportunities is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
FS Credit Opportunities	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
FS Credit Opportunities	$137.77M	7.35	N/A	N/A	N/A

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.28, meaning that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FS Credit Opportunities has a beta of 0.34, meaning that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. FS Credit Opportunities pays an annual dividend of $0.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.8%.

Summary

FS Credit Opportunities beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Orchid Island Capital?

Orchid Island Capital (NYSE:ORC) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, risk, earnings, valuation and institutional ownership.

Orchid Island Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 23.6%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. Orchid Island Capital pays out 81.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Orchid Island Capital has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Orchid Island Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

32.7% of Orchid Island Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Orchid Island Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Orchid Island Capital presently has a consensus target price of $7.50, suggesting a potential upside of 47.78%. Given Orchid Island Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Orchid Island Capital is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Orchid Island Capital	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Orchid Island Capital has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Orchid Island Capital	$414M	2.45	$159.03M	$1.48	3.43
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Orchid Island Capital has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its share price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

Orchid Island Capital's return on equity of 11.87% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Orchid Island Capital	N/A	11.87%	1.35%
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Orchid Island Capital had 1 more articles in the media than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Orchid Island Capital and 3 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Orchid Island Capital's score of -0.09 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Orchid Island Capital	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Orchid Island Capital beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings and profitability.

Goldman Sachs BDC currently has a consensus price target of $8.75, indicating a potential downside of 0.06%. Given Goldman Sachs BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Goldman Sachs BDC	3 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.86
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.28, meaning that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 17.19% compared to MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 11.04% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Goldman Sachs BDC	17.19%	11.04%	4.62%
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A

Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.6%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 246.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Goldman Sachs BDC. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust and 1 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Goldman Sachs BDC's score of 0.71 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Goldman Sachs BDC	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Goldman Sachs BDC	$365.57M	2.70	$119.27M	$0.52	16.84
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Goldman Sachs BDC beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure?

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (NYSE:TYG) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust and 2 mentions for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's score of 0.75 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure	N/A	N/A	N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

32.5% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of $5.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.1%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%.

Summary

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure and MFS Intermediate Income Trust tied by winning 3 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get MFS Intermediate Income Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MIN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	MFS Intermediate Income Trust	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$261.52M	$5.20B	$13.48B	$23.07B
Dividend Yield	10.11%	7.61%	6.08%	3.72%
P/E Ratio	N/A	30.08	24.75	28.61
Price / Sales	N/A	1,144.92	483.60	21.11
Price / Cash	N/A	47.62	29.53	19.30
Price / Book	N/A	3.49	2.71	4.72
Net Income	N/A	$415.07M	$1.32B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	0.55%	-0.02%	-0.41%	0.03%
1 Month Performance	-1.60%	-1.70%	-2.54%	-3.39%
1 Year Performance	-13.30%	9.77%	10.62%	9.40%

MFS Intermediate Income Trust Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MIN MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	$13.79 +0.0%	N/A	-13.3%	$261.52M	N/A	N/A	N/A	Dividend Cut
OCSL Oaktree Specialty Lending	2.2406 of 5 stars	$11.64 -0.5%	$11.83 +1.7%	-7.9%	$1.02B	$316.80M	24.20	N/A
FSCO FS Credit Opportunities	N/A	$4.94 -2.1%	N/A	-27.3%	$998.20M	$137.77M	N/A	N/A	Positive News
ORC Orchid Island Capital	2.6886 of 5 stars	$4.99 -1.7%	$7.50 +50.5%	-28.3%	$995.01M	$414M	3.37	2,018
GSBD Goldman Sachs BDC	1.7673 of 5 stars	$8.81 -2.5%	$8.75 -0.6%	-8.8%	$991.18M	$365.57M	16.93	8

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MIN) was last updated on 10/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) Competitors

MIN vs. OCSL, FSCO, ORC, GSBD, and TYG

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to FS Credit Opportunities?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Orchid Island Capital?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MIN vs. The Competition

MFS Intermediate Income Trust Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) Competitors

MIN vs. OCSL, FSCO, ORC, GSBD, and TYG

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Oaktree Specialty Lending?

Which has more risk and volatility, MIN or OCSL?

Is MIN or OCSL more profitable?

Do analysts rate MIN or OCSL?

Does the media prefer MIN or OCSL?

Is MIN or OCSL a better dividend stock?

Which has better earnings & valuation, MIN or OCSL?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MIN or OCSL?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to FS Credit Opportunities?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MIN or FSCO?

Is MIN or FSCO more profitable?

Does the media favor MIN or FSCO?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, MIN or FSCO?

Which has more volatility & risk, MIN or FSCO?

Is MIN or FSCO a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Orchid Island Capital?

Is ORC or MIN a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in ORC or MIN?

Do analysts prefer ORC or MIN?

Which has better valuation & earnings, ORC or MIN?

Which has more risk and volatility, ORC or MIN?

Is ORC or MIN more profitable?

Does the media refer more to ORC or MIN?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Do analysts prefer GSBD or MIN?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in GSBD or MIN?

Which has more risk & volatility, GSBD or MIN?

Is GSBD or MIN more profitable?

Is GSBD or MIN a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to GSBD or MIN?

Which has better valuation & earnings, GSBD or MIN?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure?

Does the media prefer TYG or MIN?

Is TYG or MIN more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, TYG or MIN?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of TYG or MIN?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, TYG or MIN?

Is TYG or MIN a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MIN vs. The Competition

MFS Intermediate Income Trust Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools