Go Pro
→ Why I went to Mount Rushmore (From Stansberry Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free MIN Stock Alerts

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) Competitors

MFS Intermediate Income Trust logo
$2.34 +0.01 (+0.21%)
Closing price 09/11/2026 03:58 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$2.34 +0.00 (+0.13%)
As of 08:20 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

MIN vs. GSBD, FSCO, RHLD, VRTS, and TIGR

Should you buy MFS Intermediate Income Trust stock or one of its competitors? MFS Intermediate Income Trust's main competitors and comparable companies include Goldman Sachs BDC (GSBD), FS Credit Opportunities (FSCO), Resolute Holdings Management (RHLD), Virtus Investment Partners (VRTS), and UP Fintech (TIGR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Goldman Sachs BDC currently has a consensus target price of $8.75, indicating a potential downside of 9.19%. Given Goldman Sachs BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Goldman Sachs BDC
3 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.57
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 17.19% compared to MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 11.04% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Goldman Sachs BDC17.19% 11.04% 4.62%
MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, meaning that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.3%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 246.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Goldman Sachs BDC. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust and 0 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat Goldman Sachs BDC's score of 0.00 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Goldman Sachs BDC Neutral
MFS Intermediate Income Trust Very Positive

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Goldman Sachs BDC$365.57M2.97$119.27M$0.5218.53
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Goldman Sachs BDC beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to FS Credit Opportunities?

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) and FS Credit Opportunities (NYSE:FSCO) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.4% of FS Credit Opportunities shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of FS Credit Opportunities shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. FS Credit Opportunities pays an annual dividend of $0.74 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.2%.

In the previous week, FS Credit Opportunities had 2 more articles in the media than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for FS Credit Opportunities and 2 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat FS Credit Opportunities' score of 1.21 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
FS Credit Opportunities
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
FS Credit Opportunities$137.77M7.63N/AN/AN/A

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FS Credit Opportunities has a beta of 0.34, indicating that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/A N/A N/A
FS Credit Opportunities N/A N/A N/A

Summary

FS Credit Opportunities beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Resolute Holdings Management?

Resolute Holdings Management (NYSE:RHLD) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Resolute Holdings Management.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Resolute Holdings Management$462.05M2.21-$5.92M$5.4324.08
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Resolute Holdings Management has a net margin of 4.21% compared to MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Resolute Holdings Management's return on equity of 3.55% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Resolute Holdings Management4.21% 3.55% 1.71%
MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Resolute Holdings Management
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 52.8% of Resolute Holdings Management shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Resolute Holdings Management had 1 more articles in the media than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Resolute Holdings Management and 2 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat Resolute Holdings Management's score of 1.78 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Resolute Holdings Management
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Resolute Holdings Management has a beta of -1.31, indicating that its stock price is 231% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Resolute Holdings Management beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Virtus Investment Partners?

Virtus Investment Partners (NASDAQ:VRTS) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Virtus Investment Partners. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust and 1 mentions for Virtus Investment Partners. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat Virtus Investment Partners' score of 0.53 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Virtus Investment Partners
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Virtus Investment Partners pays an annual dividend of $9.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.9%. Virtus Investment Partners pays out 55.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Virtus Investment Partners has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, suggesting that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

Virtus Investment Partners has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Virtus Investment Partners$819.58M1.19$121.75M$17.558.39
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Virtus Investment Partners currently has a consensus price target of $145.50, indicating a potential downside of 1.20%. Given Virtus Investment Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Virtus Investment Partners is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Virtus Investment Partners
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Virtus Investment Partners has a net margin of 13.42% compared to MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Virtus Investment Partners' return on equity of 21.56% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Virtus Investment Partners13.42% 21.56% 5.27%
MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

80.5% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 6.4% of Virtus Investment Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Virtus Investment Partners beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to UP Fintech?

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) and UP Fintech (NASDAQ:TIGR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

UP Fintech has a consensus price target of $8.16, suggesting a potential upside of 68.89%. Given UP Fintech's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe UP Fintech is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
UP Fintech
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

UP Fintech has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
UP Fintech$612.07M1.50$170.90M$0.598.19

In the previous week, UP Fintech had 2 more articles in the media than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for UP Fintech and 2 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.83 beat UP Fintech's score of 0.37 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
UP Fintech
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

UP Fintech has a net margin of 16.22% compared to MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. UP Fintech's return on equity of 13.11% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/A N/A N/A
UP Fintech 16.22%13.11%1.23%

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, suggesting that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UP Fintech has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.0% of UP Fintech shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

UP Fintech beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get MFS Intermediate Income Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MIN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MIN vs. The Competition

Export
MetricMFS Intermediate Income TrustCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$265.72M$5.51B$14.02B$23.34B
Dividend Yield9.94%7.50%5.95%3.57%
P/E RatioN/A30.5825.6828.72
Price / SalesN/A1,239.97513.2221.23
Price / CashN/A47.9230.3019.47
Price / BookN/A3.522.744.75
Net IncomeN/A$417.39M$1.32B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-3.51%-1.43%-1.20%-2.00%
1 Month Performance-5.66%-1.80%-0.30%-3.27%
1 Year Performance-13.52%2.62%8.30%10.51%

MFS Intermediate Income Trust Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MIN
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
N/A$2.34
+0.2%		N/A-13.5%$265.72MN/AN/AN/A
GSBD
Goldman Sachs BDC
1.2725 of 5 stars		$9.65
-0.4%		$8.75
-9.3%		-15.3%$1.09B$71.05M18.55N/A
FSCO
FS Credit Opportunities
N/A$5.26
-0.3%		N/A-30.4%$1.06B$137.77MN/AN/A
RHLD
Resolute Holdings Management
1.7361 of 5 stars		$134.41
-1.4%		N/A+89.7%$1.05B$1.12B24.755,620
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners
2.4881 of 5 stars		$152.70
-3.1%		$145.50
-4.7%		-25.6%$1.01B$819.58M9.04770

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MIN) was last updated on 9/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The only 5 stocks that matter
SpaceX's IPO reportedly minted 4,400 new millionaires, and OpenAI is said to be eyeing a 1 trillion dollar IPO...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
How options let you do more with less capital
Would you rather spend $5,000 buying 100 shares of a $50 stock, or control those same 100 shares for a fractio...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Print this before your next trade
Bill Poulos is offering his Smart Trade Options Checklist at no cost today - normally priced at $29.97. It'...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
BlackRock and Vanguard already own THIS
Institutions own roughly 88 percent of an overlooked American oil and natural gas company. BlackRock holds 32 ...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon Musk to Trigger Next AI Wave on November 11th?
Jeff Brown picked Nvidia in 2016, before shares surged 37,800 percent. Now he's identified another AI company ...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
A simple options setup that cuts through the noise
Ian Cooper says most options traders overcomplicate the process, juggling countless indicators, strategies, an...
TradeWins | Sponsoredtc pixel
This little-known gold fund distributes cash every Friday
Gold pays no dividends, no interest, no yield - it just sits there. Yet investors are reportedly collecting up...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel