Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MIN or HQH?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio MFS Intermediate Income Trust $18.81M 14.73 N/A N/A N/A abrdn Healthcare Investors $99.81M 10.95 N/A N/A N/A

Is MIN or HQH more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A abrdn Healthcare Investors N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts recommend GSBD or MIN?

Goldman Sachs BDC currently has a consensus target price of $9.17, indicating a potential upside of 3.52%. Given Goldman Sachs BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Goldman Sachs BDC 2 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67 MFS Intermediate Income Trust 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher earnings and valuation, GSBD or MIN?

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Goldman Sachs BDC $365.57M 2.73 $119.27M $0.65 13.62 MFS Intermediate Income Trust $18.81M 14.73 N/A N/A N/A

Which has better earnings and valuation, MIN or MYN?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio MFS Intermediate Income Trust $18.81M 14.73 N/A N/A N/A BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund $6.89M 136.63 N/A N/A N/A

Is MIN or MYN more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund N/A N/A N/A

Which has better valuation & earnings, TYG or MIN?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Tortoise Energy Infrastructure $46.61M 19.61 N/A N/A N/A MFS Intermediate Income Trust $18.81M 14.73 N/A N/A N/A

Is TYG or MIN more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Tortoise Energy Infrastructure N/A N/A N/A MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

Which has better valuation & earnings, OXLC or MIN?

Oxford Lane Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Oxford Lane Capital -$580.18M -1.51 $585.52M $6.46 1.49 MFS Intermediate Income Trust $18.81M 14.73 N/A N/A N/A

Is OXLC or MIN more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Oxford Lane Capital N/A N/A N/A MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) Competitors

$2.44 -0.01 (-0.20%)

Closing price 06/5/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$2.44 +0.00 (+0.21%)

As of 06/5/2026 06:29 PM Eastern

Compare

MIN vs. HQH, GSBD, MYN, TYG, and OXLC

Should you buy MFS Intermediate Income Trust stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares MFS Intermediate Income Trust with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with MFS Intermediate Income Trust include abrdn Healthcare Investors (HQH), Goldman Sachs BDC (GSBD), BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (MYN), Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (TYG), and Oxford Lane Capital (OXLC). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to abrdn Healthcare Investors?

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) and abrdn Healthcare Investors (NYSE:HQH) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.6% of abrdn Healthcare Investors shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of abrdn Healthcare Investors shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, suggesting that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn Healthcare Investors has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. abrdn Healthcare Investors pays an annual dividend of $2.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.1%.

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust and MFS Intermediate Income Trust both had 1 articles in the media. abrdn Healthcare Investors' average media sentiment score of -0.95 beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's score of -2.00 indicating that abrdn Healthcare Investors is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	Very Negative
abrdn Healthcare Investors	Negative

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A
abrdn Healthcare Investors	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	$18.81M	14.73	N/A	N/A	N/A
abrdn Healthcare Investors	$99.81M	10.95	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

abrdn Healthcare Investors beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Goldman Sachs BDC (NYSE:GSBD) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.5%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 196.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher revenue and earnings than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Goldman Sachs BDC	$365.57M	2.73	$119.27M	$0.65	13.62
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	$18.81M	14.73	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Goldman Sachs BDC had 2 more articles in the media than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Goldman Sachs BDC and 1 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust. Goldman Sachs BDC's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's score of -2.00 indicating that Goldman Sachs BDC is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Goldman Sachs BDC	Positive
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	Very Negative

Goldman Sachs BDC currently has a consensus target price of $9.17, indicating a potential upside of 3.52%. Given Goldman Sachs BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Goldman Sachs BDC is more favorable than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Goldman Sachs BDC	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 21.32% compared to MFS Intermediate Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 10.94% beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Goldman Sachs BDC	21.32%	10.94%	4.66%
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Goldman Sachs BDC beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund?

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) and BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund (NYSE:MYN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%.

50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.3% of BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	$18.81M	14.73	N/A	N/A	N/A
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund	$6.89M	136.63	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust and MFS Intermediate Income Trust both had 1 articles in the media. BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's score of -2.00 indicating that BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	Very Negative
BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund	Neutral

Summary

BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure?

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (NYSE:TYG) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, MFS Intermediate Income Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Tortoise Energy Infrastructure. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust and 0 mentions for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure. Tortoise Energy Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's score of -2.00 indicating that Tortoise Energy Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure	Neutral
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	Very Negative

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of $5.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.4%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure	$46.61M	19.61	N/A	N/A	N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	$18.81M	14.73	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure	N/A	N/A	N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, suggesting that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

32.5% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Tortoise Energy Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Oxford Lane Capital?

Oxford Lane Capital (NASDAQ:OXLC) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oxford Lane Capital	N/A	N/A	N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A

Oxford Lane Capital pays an annual dividend of $4.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 45.1%. MFS Intermediate Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. Oxford Lane Capital pays out 67.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Oxford Lane Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than MFS Intermediate Income Trust.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oxford Lane Capital	-$580.18M	-1.51	$585.52M	$6.46	1.49
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	$18.81M	14.73	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Oxford Lane Capital and Oxford Lane Capital both had 1 articles in the media. Oxford Lane Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat MFS Intermediate Income Trust's score of -2.00 indicating that Oxford Lane Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Oxford Lane Capital	Neutral
MFS Intermediate Income Trust	Very Negative

Oxford Lane Capital has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, suggesting that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

6.7% of Oxford Lane Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of Oxford Lane Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Oxford Lane Capital and MFS Intermediate Income Trust tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get MFS Intermediate Income Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MIN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	MFS Intermediate Income Trust	FIN Industry	Finance Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$277.67M	$4.63B	$13.53B	$23.05B
Dividend Yield	9.37%	6.97%	5.79%	4.09%
P/E Ratio	N/A	0.02	19.92	30.25
Price / Sales	14.73	30.66	135.28	22.20
Price / Cash	N/A	5.07	19.15	18.46
Price / Book	N/A	3.22	2.18	4.62
Net Income	N/A	$388.27M	$1.13B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-0.41%	-1.33%	-0.11%	-1.82%
1 Month Performance	-1.22%	-1.96%	-0.59%	-1.22%
1 Year Performance	-8.63%	12.15%	10.75%	21.20%

MFS Intermediate Income Trust Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MIN MFS Intermediate Income Trust	N/A	$2.44 -0.2%	N/A	-8.6%	$277.67M	$18.81M	N/A	N/A	Negative News Dividend Cut
HQH abrdn Healthcare Investors	N/A	$18.99 -0.9%	N/A	+22.0%	$1.09B	N/A	N/A	147,000
GSBD Goldman Sachs BDC	3.5958 of 5 stars	$8.98 -1.8%	$9.17 +2.1%	-23.1%	$1.01B	$365.57M	13.82	N/A
MYN BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund	N/A	$10.02 -0.1%	N/A	+6.0%	$943.08M	N/A	N/A	N/A
TYG Tortoise Energy Infrastructure	N/A	$43.70 -1.6%	N/A	+4.2%	$923.38M	N/A	N/A	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MIN) was last updated on 6/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) Competitors

MIN vs. HQH, GSBD, MYN, TYG, and OXLC

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to abrdn Healthcare Investors?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Oxford Lane Capital?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MIN vs. The Competition

MFS Intermediate Income Trust Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN) Competitors

MIN vs. HQH, GSBD, MYN, TYG, and OXLC

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to abrdn Healthcare Investors?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of MIN or HQH?

Which has more volatility and risk, MIN or HQH?

Is MIN or HQH a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor MIN or HQH?

Is MIN or HQH more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MIN or HQH?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Goldman Sachs BDC?

Which has more risk & volatility, GSBD or MIN?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in GSBD or MIN?

Is GSBD or MIN a better dividend stock?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, GSBD or MIN?

Does the media refer more to GSBD or MIN?

Do analysts recommend GSBD or MIN?

Is GSBD or MIN more profitable?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to BlackRock MuniYield New York Quality Fund?

Is MIN or MYN a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MIN or MYN?

Which has more risk & volatility, MIN or MYN?

Is MIN or MYN more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, MIN or MYN?

Does the media favor MIN or MYN?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Tortoise Energy Infrastructure?

Does the media prefer TYG or MIN?

Is TYG or MIN a better dividend stock?

Which has better valuation & earnings, TYG or MIN?

Is TYG or MIN more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, TYG or MIN?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of TYG or MIN?

Summary

How does MFS Intermediate Income Trust compare to Oxford Lane Capital?

Is OXLC or MIN more profitable?

Is OXLC or MIN a better dividend stock?

Which has better valuation & earnings, OXLC or MIN?

Does the media favor OXLC or MIN?

Which has more volatility & risk, OXLC or MIN?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in OXLC or MIN?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MIN vs. The Competition

MFS Intermediate Income Trust Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools